124:
Although, to be quite frank, I believe this site is irrelevant in wiki's standards. This woman is known for spreading her legs for four or five years. Nothing more, unfortunately. Even Koo Stark, Prince Andrew's former lover, was known for being an actress and had a band named after her. It's a shame
28:
I take wikipedia seriously as well and wish to have quality material that is both neutral and honest. There are a lot of facts from leading newspapers you removed for no reason whatsoever than to preserve a generally positive opinion on this person. A neutral opinion is stating 'all' facts, citations
120:
But wikipedia does attribute general, underlying quotes and opinions, especially when they are recurring and quoted such as: "turbulent" by major newspapers more than once/twice/three times/four times. My question was, how many of such similar quotes does one need to cite before it is promoted from
59:
It doesn't matter what I removed, and what I choose to answer about my personal life. I don't live alone. I am not about to describe my living arrangements to a stranger on a public website. And you didn't answer my question: how many citations does one need to confirm a general theme?
32:
I quoted "turbulent." It wasn't a personal opinion, it was based on articles I read continuously, some of which I cited. How many articles must a person cite to confirm that turbulent is the general, underlying theme?
125:
we are even wasting our time disputing the quote "turbulent". Anyway, was only trying to help by making it a bit more relevant than that and by giving the reader a general "quoted" mood that has been recurring.
21:
Hi I am unsure what you have with this article but please be aware wikipedia takes the quality and neutrality of is articles about living people extremely seriously.
40:
I see you removed my question about your accounts without an answer, why is that?. I would still like an answer to my question about your accounts. Please read
121:
opinion to quoted opinion/theme that sums up an overall idea for the reader. Surely there is a number. Like a thermostat.
83:
Interesting that you didn't answer my question when I have been answering yours this entire time. SAME IP=SAME HOUSE.
101:
If you guys are all in the same house and working on the same article you should read and avoid appearance of
102:
41:
29:
from leading newspapers (which I have) and letting the reader decide for himself, as you very well know.
110:
92:
73:
65:
49:
22:
106:
88:
69:
45:
36:
I know you're doing your job, but so am I, so please take my work seriously as well.
87:
I answered your question more than once , its an opinion attribute it as such.
114:
96:
77:
53:
8:
68:is from your IP address but is not you?
7:
14:
1:
139:
64:So you claim this account
25:09:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
115:09:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
97:09:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
78:09:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
54:09:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
130:
138:
137:
133:
132:
131:
129:
128:
127:
66:User:RonnyReeSm
19:
12:
11:
5:
136:
134:
118:
117:
99:
81:
80:
57:
56:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
135:
126:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:WP:MEATPUPPET
100:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
84:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
62:
61:
55:
51:
47:
43:
42:WP:Sockpuppet
39:
38:
37:
34:
30:
26:
24:
16:
123:
119:
82:
58:
35:
31:
27:
20:
107:Off2riorob
89:Off2riorob
70:Off2riorob
46:Off2riorob
23:WP:BLP
111:talk
93:talk
74:talk
50:talk
17:Davy
113:)
105:-
95:)
76:)
52:)
44:-
109:(
91:(
72:(
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.