User talk:Plange/Archive4 - Knowledge (XXG)

145:

resolve these things at GA/R if they think we've gone overboard? Maybe being physicists they're looking for an exact formula of # of cites so they can know ahead of time before submitting something to GA so it won't end up in GA/R?? I'm getting frustrated too, as it looks like they've gone back to arguing in circles again.... Sigh. The funny thing is, that if they do only do their own grading (using A-class or GTA), once they try to take it to FA level, they'll have the same fight again as there's no way it will get through FAC without adequate refs... --

1976:"political career." As the length grows, the later can be further subdivided into various offices held, like "governor" and "senator," but I've never had enough to say to further subdivide it into terms. On some I have broken out committee assignment and significant military service into another section though. It would seem like too many TOC items defeats the purpose of the TOC, but that is very subjective. The content should certainly include bills introduced/supported if noteworthy. Enjoy yourself, there's lots of work to be done in this area. 3165:

then with another family whose last name I've forgotten (yikes!) -- well it has been over 20 years! The mother was a dentist and they were related to a circus family. I was there from August 1984 to June of 1985. The experience was invaluable and one I'll never forget. I've almost completely lost my Finnish though :-( I was speaking it tolerably well enough to carry on a conversation, etc... I've always thought that Finland would be where I'd emigrate to if things got too bad here politically.

1577:). Importance of the person has nothing to do with size of lead, I don't think, but article size does. Also, it should not contain anything that isn't repeated later in the article. I looked at some of their other edits, which were more minor and dealt with wrestling (which I have no expertise on) so I can't judge if the edits were valid, but they appear ok. I'll keep an eye on your article to see if he/she comes back. Hopefully you guys will be able to work it out on the Talk page... -- 3154:

with foreigners. Since 1990's the war has become more like "plain history" with less emotions involved than before. Thus now we can present a more realistic and balanced view of the turmoil. I'm not a professional historian, but history is my beloved hobby. My own "tribe" and family was strongly involved with the war of 1918. As I had to find out what really happened at that time, I decided to try to share what I learned from the true historians, with other people. --

429:(edit conflict) That's cool-- perhaps we should do an AfD instead -- when I Googled I couldn't find any reviews of his work-- just websites of their own or listing where he was showing. Lots of artists fall in this category. Person needs to show they will have an enduring legacy to meet notability, but perhaps all this can be worked out at AfD. (after conflict) oops, oh well, sorry! If they're notable though, someone else will add them back -- 818: 3501:, which I expressed directly last night before the hostile comments came today. I will definitely take with me a greater understanding of what is desirable, for an article such as this, and I appreciate that Yannismarou and you are participating in a review project like this. Thank you! (And I may consider some level of reviewing in the future, as practice for my own editing.) 1437:

doesn't meet RS and V, then it can't go in the article. The core of NPOV is to present both sides and let the reader decide on their own. I'd also suggest asking at WP:BLP about Media Matters and whether it meets RS in relation to BLP as I know there's a special case if the source is considered to be promoting an agenda and the article is about a living person.

3264:, then you would definitely need to remove it. I added the header to make sure people stay on topic. I haven't had much experience yet on when things like this should be removed, so a more experienced admin might be better to consult with on it, because I could very well be wrong and it should be removed?... re: Franken-- Cool, will take a look this weekend! -- 2765: 296:, where we have to deal with the uncited articles that are still around. I didn't know some people were so attached to those GA stars - I got one that I didn't ask for and wasn't ready for, because some other editor thought he could FAC my article before it was thoroughly referenced and still needing a copyedit :-) 3153:

Yes, I'm Finnish and living at a 30 km distance from Kerava. In fact, my daughter is engaged with a very nice fellow from Kerava. So nice, that you have been in Finland :). Yes, the Civil War of 1918 has been a trauma for the nation for more than 80 years and we do not talk much about it, especially

2276:

and so I know I can't be accused of bias, whereas I'm afraid of diving in to fix the BLP issues with Franken because I'm afraid I would be biased (I love the guy!). I'm also leaving to go out of town for the weekend so won't be around. I think it's needed, though, and I'll try to screw up my courage.

2256:

Hi there, I appreciated your objective and sensible comments on the Hannity talk page, and wanted to pursue the conversation on the Franken controversy section. This article seems, IMHO, to be in worse shape than the Hannity page was, as the majority of the "controversies" mentioned seem to be rather

1441:

is a good one to go to about BLP issues. And you're right, we should err on the side of caution. And kudos to you for being brave and diving into such a highly controversial article! I did notice some things, one of which was this statement stuck in by an anon that struck me as odd "He was known as a

771:

Dear Angela, Just a quick note to let you know that I think you did an awesome job in organizing and implementing the Firefly project. I was cruising different project so see how the assessments are summarized and coded to link up with the front pages of each project and I liked yours the best--it is

742:

I'm getting through a copyedit, but the wine is almost gone, so some editing may have to wait until tomorrow. Your changes to the lead do help in terms of avoiding confusion but there is still excess language. A small example: watch your "howevers". The word is very rarely needed. I hope my edits are

491:

Hi Plange, First, thank you for welcoming me to Knowledge (XXG) - that is much appreciated. Second, am I right in thinking that the goal with the NZ Dictionary of Biography page on Knowledge (XXG) is to get articles on Knowledge (XXG) for all the mentioned people? There is no explanation of the point

3627:

Hi plange. I was aware of the special relativity debate with Stevecrum and have been monitoring it every so often. I've come across people like Stevecrum before, and have spent so much time arguing with the unarguable, that I end up spending most of my WP time not writing articles. Therefore, I have

3245:

Hey, congrats on the whole admin thing. Last we left off we were discussing how the Franken page needed a bit of work, so maybe you'll be glad to know that I managed to move info out of the unnecessary 'controversy' section and into the main article, and deleted all of the blog-ref'd statements, and

1886:

You brought up some valid concerns in the review and the editors have attempted to answer them in the 17 days since it was placed on hold. I'm a little iffy on its GA status but I want to respect your original review. I know you are bit busy with the RfA (Way to go with the snowballing! :D ) but can

1175:

and all around contributions. I also noticed you have been doing vandal fighting, and think you would be much more effective if you had the rollback button and ability to block, as well as the other admin tools. I was just drafting up a RFA nom for you, had to go away from my computer for an hour,

154:

No, don't give in; they are an extreme minority, and giving in on inline cites will be to the extreme detriment of Knowledge (XXG), which is already problematic in the amount of misinformation in the encyclopedia. The whole thing is absurd. Stick to it. You should see the end result, in the crap

3764:. I have reverted several times with edit summaries, I left a message on his talk page, and we are even discussing on the article's talk page. But he insists on removing the citations (more than 3RR). I am at my limit of 3RR. Could you help out in bringing back the original and arbitrating? Thanks. 3164:

I loved Finland! Unfortunately it's so expensive to fly there that I haven't been back, but I aim to some day. That's cool about your future son-in-law being from Kerava-- Don't know if he knows my host families? I stayed with Ilkka Puukka and his family and then with Kari and Marjaleena Harno, and

1436:

and are balanced with ones that present the other side of the issue (and also meet RS and V). However, no sources is not good, and if they are negative they should be removed. What you can do is remove them to the talk page to give the other editors a chance to find the source. If they can't, or it

3511:

No problem! I had to come to the defense of Yannismarou because he's such a dedicated reviewer and had done an even more detailed review than normal because of your detailed request, so I didn't want him to feel discouraged/slighted/hurt! :-) Definitely submit any other articles of your own in the

2523:

LOL! my restraint (and delay in thanking everyone) is because I'm in Mobile, Al visiting my grandmother :-) Though I can't think of anything of mine that needed to be deleted, I did want to dive in a little more than I've been able to... It was weird timing as I was on the road when I was promoted

2267:

I completely agree-- I was in a rush last night so didn't read the whole article but got to the part about the criticism with them thinking he wasn't being satiricial with the Ashcroft thing and I was like, come on! I then skipped to the bottom and saw that there were refs to blogs for some of the

2092:

Yes, it will upload the logs and add an entry to your personal log page. If you've been tagging for WPBio or WPMILHIST it will add entries to the logs at the automation departments too. It doesn't use AWB to upload the logs, it uses and extends a simple wiki editor from wikifunctions.dll: so, that

3039:

To be fair to Plange that was indeed the advice given; I however would remove anything more than half an hour old and just leave a descriptive edit summary. If it's only 5 mins since the last test4 and you have a hunch they'll be back it's OK to leave it. Generally though the object is to get the

2396:

Yes. I hope you don't get too distracted by adminship duties. My advice is have a play with the new toys but come back to where you're needed most - working with the WikiProjects and writing good articles! You'll find plenty of uses for the new tools without changing your on-wiki regime too much.

1970:

I'm currently working on John W. Johnston, a senator from Virginia in the 1800s, and wanted to find out what you thought a good TOC structure should be? I found this that you guys worked on User:PaulHanson/Style_guide but wanted to see what you guys felt was proper for content, etc? Namely, is it

1222:

Well, I put my nom up without ever having even heard of AudeVivere before; it's no conspiracy just a very strange coincidence :) I'd offer to nom Plange some time ago, which she wanted but she wanted to ask another editor too.... Anyrode: Contact interested parties offline would probably be best.

1106:

Oliver's motion picture debut at 8, in the comedy Problem Child (1990), was not the typical performance American movie-goers were used to seeing from red-haired, freckle-faced child actors (Eddie Hodges, Ron Howard, Billy Mumy, Johnny Whitaker). It was the "demon seed" role of "Junior", an orphan

385:

testing, and the artist does seem somewhat notable, or at least something salvageable. As such, I've gone in and done a little cleaning, hopefully to make a case for either a full AfD or to keep it. I know it seems very un-notable, and I know how easy it is to just tag things assuming that it's

282:

I can see your point. I was kinda disturb that they would so actively change/add/and delete the original poll. Really did make it useless. I think we agree that "token consensus" on a major guideline is not true consensus and as it states, this minority view is not enough to change the guideline.

164:

I do think there is merit to development of a GTA but you are right about it hampering them in FA. The benefit of a GA review is that being "laypersons" we can give them a better view at how a layperson reader would encounter the article. (Much like the readership of the front page FAs). But they

3529:

Hello, I noticed that you added some tags on the Sandford Ransdell Talk page. Someone feels that the article should be deleted. I thought you might be interested in evaluating it and see if you concur. I began the article and may be slightly biased in my feelings that Sanford Ransdell is of some

3288:

nutrition and proteins. On talking to the editor the (apparent) sockpuppeter was in conflict with, it seems he has opened a sockpuppet case and tried to attract the attention of an administrator to no avail. As a favor for him I figured I would contact you and let you know, since you have been a

2156:

I thought I could get your attention if I just was obnoxious enough. Thanks for the prompt reply. I'd still appreciate it if you could answer my question of long ago about what the benefits of biography are supposed to be. If you want to send me an e-mail I can demonstrate (online) that I have a

169:

we need a bridge between the information and the source-rather then just "hope" that one of the mammoth books at the bottom of the page verify the information. I think Kirill, Walkerma, Yannismarou and Sandy have made several very sensible attempts at consensus but it has fallen on deaf ears. I,

242:

As you've seen, that scenario happens every day, and it doesn't trouble me. The articles that get defeatured have no editor watching and tending them; hence, probably have much bigger problems than inline citations, and shouldn't be featured if we can't be sure their two-year old info is still

144:

I'm starting to think the same thing. I asked Kirill, Walkerma, Yannismarou and Sandy to join in, and they helped clarify things and I'd hoped we wouldn't keep going in circles after that, as it seemed pretty clear to me. How many times (as you pointed out) do we have to point out that they can

3168:

re: the Civil War -- I can imagine that would be very traumatic - civil wars are awful by their very nature. The only experience I have is so remote it's not even comparable-- my family is Southern and fought on the losing side of the American Civil War, but that's gone, as you say, into plain

2335:

You're now an admin. Use the new tools conservatively and see if you can instead figure out a way to de-escalate the situation whenever possible. But there are plenty of backlogs to work on, so as you get familiar with the tools, dig in and help clear them out. Have fun and again, congrats. -

1975:

You ask a good question. I think the answer depends on the length of the article. I always have an intro paragraph, an "Early life and family," a "Career, and a "Death and legacy." (if dead) In longer articles I like to break up the career into multiple sections like "professional career" and

1782:

Hi, Plange- I appreciate you letting us know where we should go to talk about the reliability of sources in politically charged articles. I was just wishing, as luck would have it, for some kind of authority to tell us whether or not some of the sources used in the article were kosher to draw

1675:, and I don't know how to make any other kinds of warning about vandal. That IP address was responsible for a certain vandal (see the history page of that link from title). I was hoping you are one of my chances to warn that IP address about getting banned or something like that. Reply me. -- 1414::) and I've been having a discussion with Kuzarr on my talk page about sources but am a little confused. I'm really asking what the best view is to take on verifiable sources. There are quite a few Media Matters criticisms on the Hannity page and I thought they were politically opposed. -- 90:, and we can still ask for a cite any time on anything we want. Math and physics aren't above medicine, and medical articles in journals use multiple inline cites for just about every line. Keep me informed, if you don't mind: I'm around all week. I hope I reverted to a good version :-) 2885: 3246:

all multilaterally and without any problems/conflicts. However, I'd still like for you to look at it and see if there are any further suggestions you may have for improvement there, if you have time. I also have another, unrelated question for you: should a non-constructive POV rant

2257:

silly (such as "The takedown"), and sometimes just Franken's humor being misconstrued or, at most, taken too far (such as the "Ashcroft apology"). I would like to dive into this thing, but was wondering what your thoughts were, and if you planned on really getting involved. Thanks.--

660:(What a cool award!) Plange, I just left two music bio FARs on the Bio To Do list - not sure if those should be added? I always check "What links here"; since one of them linked to the Bio Project, I thought I should go ahead and notify, since they are living people. Let me know? 3550:, including link to discussion at samuel blanning. right now, the "anon" seems to have been effectively discouraged by the block from william m connelly, and hopefully admin intervention has solved the whole problem. unless the anon resumes disruption, let's let this die, ok? 2876:

I saw your successful RfA. I'm sorry I did not notice your candidacy to cast my vote! In any case congratulations and a barnstar for you tireless devotion to Knowledge (XXG). And donot forget the peer-review section!!! For the next days I won't be able to be very active there.

795:

You are so kind! Thank you Plange. (I'm sorry I used the wrong pronoun on the Swedish project talk page. I didn't see your "About me" page the first time I visited your user page and then I forgot to correct it. It's done now.) Congratulations to the star! Well deserved. Best,

1049:

I saw the portal and thought it looked great! Better than the rag tag thing I was trying to roughly assemble in my sandbox. Oi. I can definitely work on the content for it. As for the newsletter, I'd be happy to assist, but course, I've been out of the loop somewhat. ;)

507:

Hi Anarchia! Sorry it wasn't clear, I've modified the language to hopefully clear that up :-) But, yep, it's a link to articles that are in the NZ Dictionary but that we don't have and need to create, so that would be awesome if you want to help stubbing those out!

1595:

The reason the lead is now out of shape is because this person cut the article ( a work in progress) in half, without any use of the Discussion page. I opted not for a full reversal of the article and will now obviosuly have to rework the lead (or the article).

1393:

Have a question about BLP. I've been editing the Sean Hannity page and I've no interest in getting into editing wars but it seems there are alot of criticisms where someone criticized Hannity for saying "X" but there is no citation to him saying "X." I've read

228:

Furthermore, as I've said so many times, GA should not be too tough. People are coming in now who had nothing to do with the conception of GA and want to turn it from a little badge of recognition for half-way-decent-articles into a one-reviewer FA. It's called

3362:

One user is pushing POV pretty strongly and continues to ignore WP:BLP guides about birthdays and minor offenses on non-public figs. Consensus has been established and one user (a political POV pusher from his contribs) keeps making this less than productive.

2723:: press F5. If you see no changes, quit your browser and then reload. There are many tools, and many are context sensitive, so you will see different tabs and buttons when editing pages, editing user talk pages, closing AfDs, etc. Enjoy exploring these! 772:

really elegant and effective. I'm hoping to be able to put something similar together for project Sweden, so I temporarily converted your design as a test in my sandbox to demonstrate how it works to the project participants. See the talk page for the

1638:

terms. I see that the lead was again reverted, but in reading the whole article, it's the correct thing to do now, since the POV stuff in the lead is not supported by anything later in the article (and so to a source). We have to be careful of using

261:

there has been a drive for higher quality in our articles (to paraphrase Jimbo, "we have the quantity, now let's up the quality"). The tighten in criteria for FA (and subsequently GA) is simply part of improving the overall quality of the project.

183:, and list all the reasons. Now I understand why Bravada wanted me to bring it to Review, so the case can be made. Problem is, the guy who reviewed it is a nice and helpful editor, new, trying to do his best, and I don't want to clobber him :-) 3628:

given up trying to constantly defend a mainstream point to 'non-mainstremers'. I think that enough has been said in the special relativity debate with Stevecrum that I feel I cannot add anything more useful. Thanks for letting me know anyway.

3279:

Hello, Plange. I'm back from my 1-week Wikibreak, and am now feeling much less stressed than before. I am pleased to see that you have been made an Administrator; Congratulations on this achievement and the community trust that it entails.

3190:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

1135:

Don't despair -- I've reverted it with an edit summary pointing to guideline and collapsed the paragraphs a bit. I'm assuming (as it's been awhile since I read it) that the assessments of his acting have sources in the article itself...

1452:

Thanks. I didn't want to make anything formal but thought it would be nice to have another (more experienced) pair of eyes on it and I noticed you seem to be nice to newbies. I'll check with the user name you left on my talk page.

1288:. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. 721:

of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

3301:. I'm going to myself comment on the page, since this seems to be a pretty clear-cut case of sockpuppetry and evasion of the 3RR, but if you could speak up or give Yankees76 an opinion, I'd appreciate it a bunch. Thank you. -- 3186: 1971:

encyclopedic to mention any bill introduced by the said senator? Should details be divided up by which session of Congress it occurred in? Greatly appreciate any guidance you can give. --plange 03:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

243:

accurate. I wouldn't be so concerned about being tougher on GAs if someone over there would warn new GAs that they are nowhere near ready for FA: they typically go straight from GA to FAC, which is sad and embarrassing.

71:

ah, heck, I went ahead and weighed in, but the whole thing still seems to be driven by three or four people who don't want to cite. If you want to know what I thik is an appropriate level of citations, you can find it at

1310:

I'm sure you will pass with all around strong support. It will be very helpful for you to have ability to edit protected templates, to be able to follow through with blocks when warning vandals, and help in other ways.

129:

They're clearly not trolls and so it is not a matter of "do not feed the trolls" but I'm beginning to wonder the futility of it all. I really don't want to cease having Science articles on GA but it seems like this

3283:

As much as it pains me to go bugging people as soon as I return from my break, when I was patrolling new users' contributions, I inadvertently stumbled into a problem editor making edits with sockpuppets regarding

877:

Oh cool!! I just signed in after being away for more than a day and my first inkling it'd passed was this note! I'm so excited as this is my first FA! Thank you so much for your help too!! Adding the star now :-)

170:

personally, would not go about de-listing the current science articles because I don't want to see this brew-ha continue. However, I am concern about what will happen the next time a science article is nominated.

2907:

for her tireless contributions to the Biography Project she revived, her tireless contributions to Knowledge (XXG)'s automation and her tireless efforts to bring articles to GA and FA (two until now, I think?)

1180:

also wants to nominate you. I have posted what I wrote up as a co-nomination. I have full confidence that you will get great support from the community in a RFA nom. Hope you will accept. Your RFA from me is

272:

Yep. Don't let a minority push through something detrimental, and don't let them think they can do it because they've rallied their forces to a straw poll :-) *Very* few people are even aware of this debate.

776:. Hope you don't mind. Also: If we have problems making our version work, once it's been redesigned and given its own look, I'm hoping it's OK if I stick my head in here to bother you again. :) Best wishes, -- 1037: 1122:

Michael Oliver, (born October 10, 1981, in Los Angeles, California, USA), is an American film and TV actor and child star of the 1990s. He is best known for his role as "Junior" in two Problem Child movies.

1467:

about the Criticism section specifically in relation to this, but I didn't name articles to avoid possible bias. One person has replied so far... Am keeping an eye on the article and your progress :-) --

717: 3583:

Plange...I'm afraid my ignorance is showing here, but I've been told there is significance as to what background color is used in the bio infoboxes. I can't seem to locate this "color code" anywhere.

1497:

Hi Plange. I've always been impressed by your detailled reviews on the GA project. If/when you have time, there are two articles that is under peer review and I would appreciate your input. First one

3003:

ok, thanks-- I'm a new admin, so was just trying to help out. Thought someone had said on Talk page to leave a comment on these kind so that admins could check back and see if they did it later... --

1016:

Hiyas Plange, I've returned to get into trouble. Before I just start randomly looking for something at the Virginia project, is there anything I can specifically address? P.S. Congrats on the FA!

831:. I can't express how much it means to me to become an administrator. I'll work even more and harder to become useful for the community. If you need a helping hand, don't hesitate to contact me. 3865:

There is some dicussion on the Hannity talk page about using an editorial for a statement. Could you come by and give your opinion. It's in the last section on the discussion page. Thanks. --

2839:

on hold almost a month ago. Good Article candidates may be placed on hold for maximum of seven days. Please review any outstanding concerns and pass or fail the article as you see fit. Thanks! /

292:

It kept changing while I had multiple edit conflicts, trying to record my vote. Nope, better to just keep standing up to this proposal, which will harm Wiki. They should spend some time at

3833: 3494: 2142:

Thanks so much for the reviewer's award, Plange. I'm going to immodestly put it on my User page now. Congrats on the FAC and good work tracking down things to address my concerns. Cheers,

2128:. Any idea what happened there? Looks like a valid article, looks like the plugin dealt with it correctly, so maybe an AWB glitch? (BTW, don't forget to tag on behalf of WP Aus too :)). -- 3062: 2054: 2160:

And no, I have no idea how many articles there are in your project. One of the things I tell my clients is that new projects should start small. I can't say they always listen, though.

1599:

Please watch or ask someone to...as regardless of area expertise, if you search his history, you see full paragraphs and more just being chopped out, without any use of the Discussion.

46:

The only old thing is the cleanup part -- it's a transclude and I'm waiting on a bot to update the new one I made and they haven't run it yet... Let me bug the bot operator again... --

2967:

I'm not concerned as to if you'll be a good admin or not as 60 other people agree.I recommend though that you may want to help with the backlogs here and there.Again, Congratulations

2117: 1075:

Hope you don't mind, but I knocked your warning to the above user to a test4, he's gonna continue, and it'll bring the block about sooner. It's his 4th warning this evening. Cheers

1425: 3012:

You should just place the comment in your edit summary when you remove them; that way you won't overfill the list and your comment is embedded permanently in the page history.--

1116:

Oliver, rather than fostering projects he participated in before the age of 10, remains a private person today more comfortable working behind the scenes out of the public eye.

1502: 27: 2050: 1953: 1110:

The next year he reprised the character in the sequel, Problem Child 2 (1991), and this was followed by several TV appearances, before dropping out from the public view.

970:

Also here's the politicians list. I removed a load of false positives by hand but it would nonetheless be worth having a sweep through it in Notepad to check for others.

1353:

I am currently expanding the Cheng Yen page and have worked on expanding some Chinese historical stubs, such as Zhu Wen. I will be working on more in the coming weeks.

1232:

Wow, thanks everyone-- Let me check with the other co-nom to see if he's still interested...I'd love to have you as a co-nom AudeVivere! Thanks for thinking of me :-) --

3298: 2984:

I don't mean to come off as angry here, but if they haven't edited scince test4, remove them. Leaving them there and commenting just causes major backlog. Thanks. =) --

1498: 192:

I understand and you could probably do it in a gentle way that the reviewer will learn from it. I'm sure every reviewer has made some reviewing mistakes in their time.

1714:

I've noticed you're the only one maintaining the portal (or at least the only one listed there). I'm willing to help, so if you need anything just leave me a message.

1544:

Hi Plange...can you spare just a few minutes to check on the edits this person is making... 69.209.105.235 ...or refer the matter to someone that might have the time?

61:

Wow. I just looked at the talk page table of contents, and I think I'll put this off 'til the morning, when I can give it a fresh read :-) Thanks for the heads up!

3793:

Hi there, nice to meet you. I enjoy the show a lot, though I did prefer the first season over the second one. I've never seen the movies. How do you like the show? --

987:

You only added it to the code bit. I added it to the actual example for you and you can see what it looks like (seems I made a mistake with the table part... oh...)

155:

we have to clean up on FAR. When facts aren't cited, there is most often a reason, and they are most often wrong. These few are not representative of all of Wiki.

1464: 1036:, but it desparately needs more content-- I only did a few in the attractions but it could definitely have more... The only other thing I can think of is crafting 3416:

Okay, I merged our one with yours to preserve the history and keep your name, since I knew where our one was transcluded from so it was easier to alter to yours.

3342:

It appears an admin (Mike Rosoft) noticed the case and took care of it. Dunno if you had something to do with it, but looks like it's sorted now. Thank you. :) --

2285:

who helped craft the BLP policy and so knows it inside and out and is objective. He's the one I referred the guys who were working on the Hannity article on... --

3810:

I guess I liked the first season better because I found it a little easier to figure out than the second season. I love the artwork and the music in the show. --

1732:

bio has been assaulted with no less than 7 vandalism incidents in the last 2 days. Is this enough to request semi-protection again; or is this a non-solution?

912: 3311:

oh boy-- I've had no experience with sock puppet investigations and don't know anyone to refer you to. Let me see if I can find someone I know that can help --

3169:

history, though even today (140 some odd years later) tempers can flare about it... Good job on the article and I hope to see it reach FA soon! Go Finland!! --

329:

LOL! Yep, I know, I felt like a strange animal let out of the zoo :-) Friend of mine's birthday dinner at a nice restaurant - wine, food, chocolate, mmm.... --

1565:

Careful, I'm not an admin :-) (I noticed you said I was in the edit summary), though I am currently up for one (see above). I see they reverted the lead for

2097:

in the registry (it never gets saved to XML). The advantage I've found to this is that I do the uploading under my own username, getting the log files onto

1333: 2642:

For all of the congrats!! I'm actually at my grandmother's this weekend so will be checking in only occassionally :-( Thanks everyone for your support! --

1798: 1748: 1284: 1242: 890:

When I got my first I was surprised that the FA director didn't put the star on himself. I had to go to his talk and check "have you promoted it?" :) --

824: 459:

No worries - I'm just getting the hang of this, so totally open to feedback on if I'm doing things right or not -- in that vein, what would you do with

386:

vanity. Anyway, I'm not sure if I should put a {{hangon}} tag yet, but if you're okay with it, I might do so and try to keep the article up. Thanks! —

207:

OK, before we get too far down the road of thinking that only lunatics oppose mandatory inline citations in GAs, tell me what happens in this scenario:

1647:. I don't agree with part of his/her edit summary that low importance articles shouldn't have leads, though. I would work on finding a source for the 1952:(too many hats!) but could you look at WPBio's template talk some time? All my technical energy is going into plugin development at the minute (see 180: 1547:

If you check their history, there seems to be some very radical "chopping" going on instead of listing entries for debate on the Discussion pages.

661: 2790: 1424:

I'm not the strongest one to ask about BLPs but I'll try and answer your questions. If it continues to be a problem, you should bring it up with

1398:

and it seems that you should lean to the side of caution. There are two editors on there who hold opposing views on the subject of the article:

591:

Oops, again! Sorry, didn't know about the flagging procedure, just thought approval meant full steam ahead. Will do --15:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

582:(as of this post), or else it would clog up recent changes. Once it is flagged you are more than welcomed to edit back as normal. Many thanks. -- 3668:

If it does not constitute an official spin-off, but IS based on the Firefly universe, how should it be mentioned in the article, if at all? --

2774: 1428:, but only if you're at an impasse or there's a flagrant violation of BLP. Sources that have an opposing view are fine, as long as they meet 2674:

You may have missed this. Let me know if you want to try these. If you don't like them (which I doubt you would) they are easy to remove.

2101:

watchlist :) I've done several runs now, so the feature works, but as I say on the download there's a few things to finish up and test. --

2066:

whoah!! that's amazing! so it's basically going to rewrite that page with what people have done? Can a guy get two Davinci barnstars??? --

963:

Hi Plange. There's a new version of the plugin available; changes included the 2 buttons you asked for on the comments form (and 1 button

3760:

Hi Plange. I didn't think I would be asking for your help so soon, but an anonymous editor has removed text (citations) from the article

1151:

Thanks so much; I don't disagree that an edit was probably necessary, but jeez, leave something! It was even flagged for a further edit!

1103:

Michael Oliver, (born October 10, 1981, in Los Angeles, California, USA), is an American film and TV actor and child star of the 1990s.

1689:

The review has been up there for something like six weeks, I notice. Think you'll be able to take care of those last couple of things?

1275: 698: 2023:

got the politicians, thanks! What's the new upgrade going to do? I wasn't sure what I was looking at on the pic, but it looks cool! --

1094:

What's the point of doing a good and/or comprehensive lead on an article when these "choppers" come along and cut the life out of it.

1172: 609: 496:

the New Zealand Dictionary of Biography? (Sub-text: I am well placed to write about some of the entries and it sounds like fun.) (

108:

How about if I notify Yomangani (I know him fairly well), and you notify Yannismarou (I haven't interacted with him that often)?

3547:

yes--there is something you are missing, but I am hoping that it can just be kept off wikipedia as much as possible. please read

99:

I dropped a note to LuciferMorgan: other citers are Yomangani and Yannismarou. I can send more notes if it becomes necessary.

3774:

In the meantime, if you can come in on the discussion on the talk page, I am disengaging for a couple of days as recommended by

3377:

The Borges article of the portal has clearly been vandalized. I unfortunately can't figure out how to correct it. Hope you can.

1602:

If not a breach of policy, I would think it is at least rude-worthy enough for some type of contact (I'm not too good at that).

2546:

I'll be sure to wave at the interstate in the relatively unlikely event that you drive through Nashville on your way home. ;-)

2241:

no problem! I did the same thing you did too, until someone let me know I could combine them :-) Good luck with the article! --

756:

Thanks Marskell, I really appreciate the help!! I'll give it another read through too and keep an eye our for the 'howevers' --

1863:'s amusing essays but quite irrelevant to 99.9% of Wikipedians. I advise skipping that question, it's a redlink now anyway. -- 1747:

You'll need to talk to an admin, as I won't be able to do that. Here's a list of admins that are a member of the bio project:

673:

Yep, that's cool, unfortunately we're now doing musical groups since we pulled in WikiProject Musicians as a work group :-) --

3401:

which does the same thing. Still, not to worry, I'll work through the links and see which one of them is easiest to kill. :)

3023: 2995: 2408:

Congratulations, Plange! Have fun with the new toolset. If you have any admin-related questions, feel free to contact me. =)

1939: 1573:

though and make sure any claims are backed up by sources. For an article of this size, 2 paragraphs would be sufficient (see

2787: 939:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 134:

of editors are harden against in-line cites. It seems like the only way to get peace is to agree to disagree and part ways.

85:

I reverted the main page, but they've made such a mess of it that I'm not certain I reverted to a good version <sigh: -->

3289:

professional and helpful figure in the admittedly brief time in which I've talked to you. For reference, the two users are

2951:

Thanks, will do! Am taking baby steps and it's good to know some admins to turn to before I start taking larger ones :-) --

1332:

It's going great so hopefully by this time tommorow you'll have some extra buttons. Oh and you now have more supports than

1369: 3457:

Not sure-- I think it's still awaiting a bot flag? I left a message with someone about this but haven't heard back... --

2941:

Congratulations on the RfA! Let me know if you ahve any questions about the admin tools or procedures. See ya around :)

2203: 2171: 371: 3609: 3250:

be removed from an article's talk page by anybody other than the author, even if he has since been blocked? Thanks.--

3497:. I am surprised how hostile the comments of the other editor were. I greatly appreciate the thoughtful response of 1699:

Yep, sorry! Was caught up with my RfA Friday and was out all day yesterday-- Hoping to take care of them today.... --

360:

Sure thing, if you have the time; the more comments, the better the article will (hopefully) wind up being. Thanks!

3832:

You seem to be one to know, and implement...shouldn't Barak Obama's article be listed as a Featured Article on the

2121: 1992: 940: 2451: 1206:

before you accept. If you only want the nom from Kingboyk and "another named party to nominate", that's fine. --

444: 414: 392: 3846:

Definitely! It's hard for me to keep up with all of them project-wide, so if you know of any recent promotions,

33:

What on earth is that page, Plange, and why does a supposedly new page have stale requests going back to 2004?!

3741: 3391:

Just picked up on the fact that you created this for us. Many thanks, but we already have a similar template,

2931:

Thanks Yannismarou!!! I'll definitely stop by the PR area-- thanks again for all the hard work you do there! --

2491: 3816: 3799: 3395: 3333: 3138: 3120: 3092: 3074: 2732: 2683: 2661: 2524:

and wasn't able to check until the next day :-( so I missed out on the feeling of immediacy in it all.... --

2460: 1672: 1182: 3102:

LOL! I had clicked on that to start assessing and saw I had a message and it was this one-- good timing! --

1927: 1357: 612:

For your diligent use of automated tools to the great benefit of the project, I hereby bestow upon you the

2862: 2306: 1856: 1833: 1807: 1566: 1317: 1212: 1191: 1069: 911: 36:

It looks to me like that page should be blanked and started afresh or, better still, deleted. Thoughts? --

3473: 2809: 2652:

May I install some excellent scripts in your monobook.js? Makes admin life less tedious... Let me know.

3632: 3421: 3406: 3231: 2583: 2268:

criticisms... To tell you the truth, I'm kind of a scaredey-cat and also oddly find it easier to defend

2225:: I am NOT "spamming". I am not placing this message on any other editor's page. I am merely thanking 1665: 1002: 927: 76:. bah ... I should have taken time to formulate my arguments better, but I have no use for nonsense. 1818:

I have, but am at work so am only able to dive in during mini-breaks-- will answer them tonight :-) --

867:

Come on, plange! Trigg desperately wants his star. Don't let him wait! Just put it! Congratulations!--

492:

of the page on the page and nothing on the 'talk' page. Or is the goal of the page to write something

3214: 2387: 2301: 2161: 1828: 1802: 1312: 1207: 1186: 992: 555: 534: 3811: 3794: 3290: 2230: 2208: 1640: 1635: 614: 3746: 3629: 3226: 3155: 2485: 2421: 2360: 2032:

That's a visual representation of some of the objects inside the plugin code. It's a screenshot of

1931: 1626:

I looked at his/her edits and I actually thought they were fine. Blogs do not meet the criteria of

1378:

Glad to have you aboard and also glad to have someone working on Chinese historical biographies! --

1293: 998: 988: 636: 620: 361: 351: 3659:

Official means that it's either produced or endorsed by the copyright holders of the franchise. --

3531: 2505:

Impressive display of restraint too - she hasn't even deleted anything yet! I had a backlog of my

2157:

serious interest in this topic. You might well be interested in some of the points I have raised.

833:

You wrote: "already thought he was an admin!". That's the best compliment a candidate can get. :)

817: 3378: 3294: 3221: 3018: 2990: 2345: 2046: 1935: 1501:

you might have seen when it was on the Biography review. This one is written by me. The other is

1279: 1203: 460: 347: 2884: 3530:

historical significance. Anyway, your imput one way or the other would be greatly appreciated.

3430:

Cool, sorry about that! I tried to look to see if one existed, but I must have missed it :-) --

3260:

It's borderline-- It's just a rant, it'll eventually go into archives. However, if it violated

2825: 3570: 3251: 2858: 2819: 2566:

Add mine to the long deserved list of thanks and congrats (and new responsibilities...) Best!

2258: 1365: 934: 683: 664: 321: 297: 274: 244: 184: 156: 109: 100: 91: 86:. I think Kirill summed it up, and it's much ado about nothing. They aren't going to change 77: 73: 62: 3733: 1651:

stuff in the second paragraph of the original lead and then you'll be on firmer ground.... --

1574: 3779: 3765: 3563: 3523: 3498: 3448: 3417: 3402: 2922: 2909: 2900: 2579: 1506: 1168: 868: 838: 463:

that just got posted? Looks like OR, but I guess that doesn't qualify for a speedy right? --

17: 3321: 3261: 2978: 2752: 2278: 2269: 2093:

means a seperate login process. I get the username and password from the user and store it

1395: 971: 530: 310:

Whoah! Girl goes to dinner and comes back to a new whole round at WP:CITE! Diving in.... --

293: 3837: 3761: 3669: 3650: 3502: 3329: 3134: 3116: 3088: 3070: 2728: 2679: 2657: 2475: 2380: 1531: 1442:

man who loved Jesus and Reagan" Known by whom, and is this important enough to include? --

1033: 950: 773: 702: 449: 439: 419: 409: 397: 387: 378: 3847: 3775: 1648: 1644: 1631: 1627: 1570: 1429: 2857:

I didn't read your responses the same way this editor did, but perhaps I was mistaken.

3738: 3646: 3477: 3196: 2968: 2854: 2409: 1960: 727: 635:

All we need now is a bot to actually write the articles for us, and we'll be done! ;-)

583: 526: 519: 346:

I wonder what all the people complaining about inline citations will say when they see

3711: 1433: 87: 3041: 3013: 2985: 2840: 2628: 2514: 2447: 2398: 2369: 2198: 2143: 2129: 2102: 2058: 2033: 2014: 2001: 1977: 1957: 1864: 1690: 1337: 1302: 1269: 1241:

Oh, was wondering why you guys were talking about timing, etc., just found this page

1224: 1177: 974: 891: 747: 497: 234: 210:

Brilliant written article from 2004, with references but no inline citations, gets FA

37: 3447:

Why do the PlangeBot edits still show when I try to hide bot edits on my watchlist?

3065:. Would appreciate your comments on how to improve that article. Thanks in advance. 1282:

to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at

1254:

Well, regardless of who co-nominates your RfA, I look forward to supporting it. :-)

1113:

Junior quickly became Oliver's signature role, a role that follows him to this day.

554:

Any chance of marking those bot edits as minor? Check the menus at the top. Thanks,

438:

Very true. Sorry to bother you and conflict and all that XD thanks for your reply! —

3554: 3364: 2942: 2814: 2804: 2600: 2567: 2434: 1407: 1403: 1361: 1051: 1017: 233:

articles. FA is what we aspire to, GA is merely a stepping stone along the way. --

3851: 3718: 3701: 3682: 3660: 3613: 3599: 3586: 3513: 3512:

future, I look forward to helping out! Sorry this one got spoiled for you :-( --

3486: 3458: 3431: 3356: 3343: 3312: 3302: 3265: 3170: 3103: 3031: 3004: 2952: 2932: 2836: 2693: 2643: 2618: 2599:...not sure who the techno wizards are, but there seems to be a code problem on 2525: 2356:

Congratulations! (Not that I had any doubts your RFA would pass, of course! ;-)

2337: 2286: 2242: 2226: 2194: 2183: 2067: 2024: 1907: 1898: 1888: 1879: 1819: 1784: 1769: 1752: 1738: 1700: 1652: 1618: 1608: 1592:

Sorry about that (the administrator title) I realized it after it was too late.

1578: 1556: 1516: 1468: 1443: 1411: 1399: 1379: 1246: 1233: 1154: 1137: 1126: 1076: 1041: 879: 853: 834: 787: 786:

Thanks! No problem in using whatever you need and let me know how I can help! --

757: 674: 646: 566: 546: 509: 473: 464: 430: 330: 311: 284: 263: 193: 171: 146: 135: 47: 3869: 3854: 3840: 3821: 3804: 3782: 3768: 3750: 3721: 3685: 3677:

I don't know that it can. You might have better luck incorporating it into the

3672: 3663: 3653: 3635: 3616: 3602: 3589: 3573: 3557: 3534: 3516: 3505: 3480: 3461: 3451: 3434: 3425: 3410: 3381: 3367: 3346: 3337: 3315: 3305: 3268: 3254: 3235: 3199: 3173: 3158: 3142: 3124: 3106: 3096: 3078: 3044: 3034: 3025: 3007: 2997: 2971: 2955: 2945: 2935: 2925: 2912: 2866: 2843: 2736: 2696: 2687: 2665: 2646: 2631: 2621: 2586: 2570: 2561: 2550: 2538: 2528: 2517: 2499: 2478: 2468: 2454: 2437: 2428: 2401: 2391: 2372: 2363: 2340: 2325: 2311: 2289: 2261: 2245: 2233: 2211: 2207:. Let me know what you think of the article, or feel free to chip in. Yours, 2164: 2146: 2132: 2105: 2070: 2061: 2027: 2017: 2004: 1980: 1910: 1901: 1891: 1867: 1838: 1822: 1812: 1787: 1772: 1755: 1741: 1718: 1703: 1693: 1679: 1655: 1621: 1611: 1581: 1559: 1534: 1519: 1509: 1484: 1471: 1457: 1446: 1418: 1382: 1340: 1322: 1305: 1296: 1258: 1249: 1236: 1227: 1217: 1196: 1157: 1140: 1129: 1081: 1060: 1044: 1026: 1006: 977: 953: 894: 882: 871: 856: 842: 800: 790: 780: 760: 750: 731: 705: 686: 677: 667: 649: 639: 623: 586: 569: 560: 549: 539: 512: 500: 476: 467: 454: 433: 424: 402: 364: 354: 333: 324: 314: 300: 287: 277: 266: 247: 237: 196: 187: 174: 159: 149: 138: 112: 103: 94: 80: 65: 50: 40: 3708: 3325: 3130: 3112: 3084: 3066: 2782: 2748: 2724: 2675: 2653: 2558: 2547: 2535: 2322: 2282: 1729: 1715: 1438: 1255: 797: 777: 3678: 2013:

I'm just about to upload an alpha version of plugin 0.9, a major upgrade. --

1676: 918: 3649:

is not an official spin-off? What does constitute an official spin-off? --

3083:(Belated congrats on your adminship... I may have missed your nomination!) 2344: 2010:

Did you grab the politicians zip file from my FTP and can I delete it now?

608: 3866: 3778:

even though I am currently shepherding this article through Peer Review.

2443: 1860: 1481: 1454: 1415: 2379:

Use your new shiny mop well! (=for the MILHIST project of course :P) --

1643:

terms if they are not attributable to a reliable source, otherwise it's

1515:

Thanks, I will! Esp. the last one since I used to live in Finland :-) --

3285: 2612:

There's nothing showing on the edit page and reverts don't do a thing.

1897:

sure thing! I'm still at work but will take a look at it tonight :-) --

472:

Never mind-- someone just gave it a prod. I'll keep that in mind :-) --

3472:

This is little odd, it usually won't take this long. I left a note on

3247: 3180:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

1091:(Comments from Plange)..See if you can expand the lead per WP:LEAD... 3493:

I understand completely that you would not desire to participate in

1530:

Hi Plange, Thanks for the welcome, glad to be a part of the project.

408:

Uhm, never mind, it was already deleted. Oh well. Thanks anyway. XD —

382: 2764: 1617:

hmm, didn't know he'd chopped your article -- will look into it! --

607: 3111:

Thanks for the fixes and the rating. Look forward to the review.

2715:: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), 1171:. I have been entirely impressed with all your contributions to 922: 165:

can't seem to realize that to make these articles accessible to

2578:

Congratulations on your promotion, and you're very welcome! --

2036:

basically. The DLL is bigger than AWB's WikiFunctions DLL now!

1480:

Thanks again. Your help has made a big difference already. --

3834:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Biography/Politics_and_government

3495:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Biography/Peer_review/Mitt_Romney

2711:

Added scripts to User:Plange/monobook.js. To see the changes.

1906:

Sorry, ran out of time tonight-- will tackle tomorrow nite --

967:

asked for :)). Haven't looked at the edit summary issue yet.

3063:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Biography/Peer_review/Prem_Rawat

2763: 2055:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Automation/Logs

2627:

Fixed. It was a double redirect in the infobox template. --

1843:

Just here to ask the same. They've been tough with the q's.

1749:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Biography/Members#Admin_members

2692:

I did miss the first post, thanks! That would be great! --

2197:, thank you for the edits on the new article I created on 1783:

assertions from. Anyway, you've been a help. Thank you. --

711:

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006

1426:

Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

2045:

The new version can upload logs. It's pretty cool - see

3705: 3548: 2229:

for the contribution. Thank you for noticing. Yours,

2125: 699:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Films#Reliable source?

579: 3700:

Hi. After a little delay (sorry about that), and per

3569:

I have nominated this article for deletion via AFD. --

3220:, and then use the protect button to lock it. Eg, see 2118:

User:PlangeBot/Logs/191006_Australian_military_stubs_1

645:

Cool!!! Thank you! My first award from MILHIST! :-) --

28:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography/Article requests

2186:

for the edit to my newly created article. Thank you.

2051:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography/Automation/Logs

1954:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography/Automation/Logs

3299:

Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Messenger2010

2459:

Congratulations on an impressive RfA! Take care --

1859:

has been userfied (where it belongs). It was one of

1336:;) (Not difficult mind, I only just topped 50). -- 1272:would like to nominate you to be an administrator. 2359:Here's some champagne to celebrate the occasion. 1505:where I helped out the original authors. Thanks. 213:Article is defeatured because no inline citations 2921:By the way, congratulatios for your second FA.-- 3681:article perhaps, but others might not agree. -- 2609:This line is appearing at the top of the page. 1301:Yes indeed. Let's get this show on the road! -- 746:Kudos on the article. A very interesting read. 2433:Congratulations on a well-deserved promotion! 1887:you take a look and see if it passes? Thanks! 1107:child no one could control and no one wanted. 381:}}. I was about to do so, but I did a little 3850:and add them, that would be great! Thanks! -- 1285:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Plange 1243:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Plange 8: 1032:Welcome back!! I went ahead and started the 1966:Question on historical senators biographies 1278:to see what this process entails, and then 662:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography/to do 578:in the time being since it is approved but 3707:, I've granted your bot a flag. Cheers, 2759: 2300:Congratulations on your successful RFA! -- 1994:File:Kingbotk plugin in Object Browser.png 1827:Sounds good. The RFA is looking great. -- 906: 2882: 1991: 931:was updated with a fact from the article 565:Oops, thanks for catching that-- done! -- 2368:Congrats from me too! Excellent news. -- 377:I noticed you tagged the article with {{ 181:attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 2321:Congratulations on your shiny new mop! 2223:NOTE: to Knowledge (XXG) Administrators 2180:NOTE: to Knowledge (XXG) Administrators 3732:Hi - I'm just waiting for approval at 2835:You placed the Good Article candidate 2484:Congratulations, you deserve the mop. 2182:: I am NOT "recruiting" I am thanking 1630:and he/she did edit out any lingering 1276:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 3320:Best to place these incidents at the 2007:Auto-upload feature almost finished. 1173:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography 1167:Thank you for doing a great job with 887:Congrats! The first of many I'm sure. 574:Please lower your bot's edit rate to 7: 3579:Background colors a la bio infoboxes 219:Overnight it falls from FA class to 3828:Obama missing as FA on project page 3210:HI. Simply recreate the page using 2606:1. REDIRECT Template:Infobox Actor 1569:-- You do need to be careful about 487:New Zealand Dictionary of Biography 3789:Nice to meet a fellow GITS:SAC fan 3297:. The open sockpuppet page is at 2772:Thank you for your support of the 2534:My pleasure, and congratulations! 823:Thank you for participating in my 24: 3195:This is an automated delivery by 3129:Thanks. Very useful information. 2893:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 2124:is a redlink with nothing in the 1550:I would appreciate it very much. 726:This is an automated delivery by 2883: 1664:How to alert vandalism, esp. on 910: 816: 3608:The place to ask that would be 2786:was selected to be improved to 827:, which passed with a tally of 812: 320:Food? Dinner? What's that? 41:18:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 3387:Template:ComicsCollab article 3373:Vandalism to Biography Portal 3061:Hello Plange. I have created 2905:Tireless Contributor Barnstar 2746: 1204:User_talk:Kingboyk#Plange_RFA 216:Article can't even get GA now 3870:20:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3855:20:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3841:19:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3822:23:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3805:17:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3783:14:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3769:14:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3751:23:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3722:17:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3712:17:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3686:17:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3673:17:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3664:17:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3654:17:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3636:12:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3617:16:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 3603:12:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 3590:02:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 3574:23:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3558:21:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3535:18:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3517:02:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3506:01:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3481:01:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3462:01:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3452:01:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3435:23:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3426:23:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3411:22:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3382:17:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3368:17:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3347:17:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3338:23:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3316:23:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3306:15:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3269:03:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3255:03:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 3236:04:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 3200:22:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3174:17:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3159:17:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3143:19:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3125:03:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3107:01:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3097:01:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3079:01:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3045:09:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3035:01:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3026:01:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 3008:01:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 2998:01:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 2972:06:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2956:21:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2946:18:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2936:21:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2926:18:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2913:18:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2867:13:10, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2844:06:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2826:00:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2737:23:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 2697:22:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 2688:22:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 2666:01:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 2647:15:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2632:11:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2622:11:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2587:04:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2571:21:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2562:17:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2557:Congratulations, Plange! -- 2551:17:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2539:15:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2529:15:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2518:10:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2500:00:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2479:23:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 2469:23:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 2455:16:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2438:01:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2429:21:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2402:16:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2392:19:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2373:21:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2364:20:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2351:A toast to our newest admin! 2341:19:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2326:19:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2312:19:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2290:14:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2272:policies with conservatives 2262:08:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2246:22:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 2234:21:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 2212:21:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 2204:Combatting Cult Mind Control 2172:Combatting Cult Mind Control 2165:19:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 2147:12:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 2133:11:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2106:19:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2071:18:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2062:18:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2028:16:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2018:16:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2005:12:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 1981:20:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 1961:19:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 1911:03:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 1902:21:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1892:21:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1868:22:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1839:17:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1823:17:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1813:17:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1797:Not sure if you noticed the 1788:16:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1773:03:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1756:03:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1742:03:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1719:19:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 1704:14:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 1694:12:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 1680:09:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 1656:04:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 1622:00:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 1612:00:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 1582:00:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 1560:23:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1535:22:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1520:00:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 1510:21:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1485:20:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1472:16:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1458:16:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1447:04:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 1419:19:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1383:04:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1341:22:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 1323:17:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1306:11:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1297:11:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1259:05:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1250:03:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1237:03:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 1228:19:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 1218:17:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 1197:17:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 1158:21:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 1141:17:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 1130:11:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 1082:18:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 1061:19:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 1045:17:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 1027:01:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 1007:01:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 697:I responded to your post at 615:Military history WikiProject 3610:Template talk:Infobox actor 978:18:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 954:12:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 895:18:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 883:23:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 872:19:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 857:23:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 843:15:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 801:23:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 791:23:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 781:04:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 761:23:04, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 751:21:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 732:20:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 706:20:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 687:18:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 678:18:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 668:17:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 650:05:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 640:05:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 624:05:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 617:Distinguished Service Award 587:14:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 570:03:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 561:03:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 550:02:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 540:02:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 513:20:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 501:19:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 477:05:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 468:05:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 455:05:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 434:05:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 425:05:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 403:05:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 365:04:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 355:03:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 334:03:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 325:03:02, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 315:02:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 301:00:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 288:00:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 278:00:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 267:00:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 248:23:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 238:23:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 197:23:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 188:23:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 175:23:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 160:23:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 150:22:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 139:22:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 113:02:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 104:02:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 95:02:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 81:01:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 66:00:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 51:15:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 3885: 3476:to see what's going on. -- 3030:ok, thanks for the tip! -- 2122:Talk:Arthur Reginald Evans 1406:. I've been warned about 1245:, that is funny timing! -- 3728:Peer review bottification 3623:separate comments, please 2889: 2775:Article Improvement Drive 1176:came back and found that 941:"Did you know?" talk page 767:About the Firefly project 529:has been approved to use 2853:Your name was mentioned 2347:File:Bulle champagne.jpg 2126:Knowledge (XXG) page log 1350:Thanks for the welcome. 1292:All up to you, now! ;-) 743:helpful and make sense. 372:Alexander "Sasha" Spivak 1923:Thanks for the welcome. 1878:Can you take a look at 1778:Thanks for the referral 1724:Semi-protect Ben Savage 1673:User talk:68.255.30.106 1671:I posted my message to 1038:this month's newsletter 576:1 edit every 15-20 secs 3474:WT:BRFA#User:PlangeBot 2768: 2352: 2201:'s best-selling book, 2075:I dunno can he? :) lol 1567:Michael Oliver (actor) 1540:Can You Investigate... 1526:Thanks for the Welcome 1070:User talk:209.32.71.18 626: 259:across Knowledge (XXG) 2849:Courtesy notification 2831:GA Nomination on hold 2767: 2615:Thanks and congrats! 2350: 1947: 1666:The Lake House (film) 632:Assessment... check! 611: 604:Invasion of the bots! 545:Thanks Alphachimp! -- 3695: 1463:I just asked on the 2795:Hope you can help. 2274:because I'm not one 132:one single category 3749: 3704:'s final approval 3355:Could you look at 3295:User:Messenger2010 3222:Sarah Hanson-Young 3187:October 2006 issue 2769: 2747:You helped choose 2353: 2047:User:Kingbotk/Logs 1948:I know you're busy 1799:optional questions 1793:Optional questions 1605:Thanks...again!!! 852:You're welcome! -- 718:October 2006 issue 629:Tagging... check! 627: 342:Fun with citations 179:Wait til I delist 3737: 3424: 3409: 3336: 3202: 3141: 3123: 3095: 3077: 2919: 2918: 2903:award Plange the 2799: 2798: 2735: 2719:: press Ctrl-F5, 2686: 2664: 2513:passed RFA! :) -- 2509:to clear up when 2466: 2310: 1944: 1930:comment added by 1837: 1811: 1503:Finnish Civil War 1374: 1360:comment added by 1321: 1216: 1195: 1005: 947: 946: 935:Charles F. Mercer 849: 848: 734: 74:Tourette syndrome 3876: 3819: 3814: 3802: 3797: 3744: 3717:Thanks Redux! -- 3696:PlangeBot's flag 3641:Firefly spin-off 3564:Sanford Ransdell 3524:Sanford Ransdell 3489:Biography review 3420: 3405: 3400: 3394: 3328: 3241:Franken and more 3219: 3213: 3194: 3133: 3115: 3087: 3069: 3040:page cleared. -- 3021: 3016: 2993: 2988: 2887: 2880: 2879: 2822: 2817: 2812: 2807: 2788:featured article 2760: 2727: 2678: 2656: 2638:Thanks everyone! 2592:Techno wizard... 2496: 2488: 2464: 2426: 2419: 2414: 2385: 2348: 2331:Congratulations! 2304: 2277:Another ally in 1997: 1995: 1943: 1924: 1831: 1805: 1710:Portal:Biography 1373: 1354: 1315: 1280:contact kingboyk 1210: 1189: 1169:Portal:Biography 1058: 1056: 1024: 1022: 1001: 995: 914: 907: 820: 813: 725: 452: 447: 442: 422: 417: 412: 400: 395: 390: 18:User talk:Plange 3884: 3883: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3863: 3830: 3817: 3812: 3800: 3795: 3791: 3762:Joseph W. Tkach 3758: 3742: 3730: 3698: 3643: 3625: 3597: 3581: 3567: 3542: 3540:bio noticeboard 3527: 3491: 3470: 3445: 3398: 3392: 3389: 3375: 3360: 3277: 3243: 3217: 3211: 3208: 3182: 3151: 3059: 3019: 3014: 2991: 2986: 2982: 2964: 2874: 2872:Congratulations 2851: 2833: 2824: 2820: 2815: 2810: 2805: 2800: 2757: 2751:as this week's 2721:Opera/Konqueror 2640: 2594: 2498: 2492: 2486: 2474:Word. You rock! 2422: 2415: 2410: 2381: 2346: 2333: 2319: 2298: 2296:Congratulations 2254: 2176: 2162:John FitzGerald 2154: 2140: 1993: 1989: 1968: 1950: 1925: 1921: 1884: 1795: 1780: 1764: 1726: 1712: 1687: 1669: 1590: 1542: 1528: 1499:Joseph W. Tkach 1495: 1391: 1355: 1348: 1346:Bio WikiProject 1289: 1165: 1149: 1147:Hi...and thanks 1089: 1073: 1054: 1052: 1020: 1018: 1014: 993: 985: 983:Re: WPBiography 961: 905: 865: 841: 811: 769: 740: 713: 695: 658: 606: 580:NOT YET flagged 524: 489: 450: 445: 440: 420: 415: 410: 398: 393: 388: 375: 344: 127: 125:Is it hopeless? 59: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3882: 3880: 3862: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3829: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3790: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3757: 3754: 3729: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3697: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3647:Into the Black 3645:May I ask why 3642: 3639: 3624: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3596: 3593: 3580: 3577: 3566: 3561: 3541: 3538: 3526: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3490: 3484: 3469: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3388: 3385: 3374: 3371: 3359: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3318: 3291:User:Yankees76 3276: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3242: 3239: 3207: 3204: 3181: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3166: 3150: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3127: 3109: 3058: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 2981: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2963: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2939: 2938: 2917: 2916: 2896: 2895: 2890: 2888: 2873: 2870: 2850: 2847: 2832: 2829: 2802: 2797: 2796: 2794: 2779: 2770: 2758: 2756: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2713:Mozilla/Safari 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2669: 2668: 2639: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2593: 2590: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2532: 2531: 2503: 2502: 2490: 2472: 2471: 2457: 2440: 2431: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2376: 2375: 2366: 2361:Kirill Lokshin 2357: 2332: 2329: 2318: 2315: 2297: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2238: 2237: 2218: 2216: 2215: 2190: 2188: 2187: 2175: 2168: 2153: 2150: 2139: 2136: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 1988: 1987:Plugin picture 1985: 1984: 1983: 1967: 1964: 1949: 1946: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1883: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1794: 1791: 1779: 1776: 1763: 1762:Thanks...again 1760: 1759: 1758: 1725: 1722: 1711: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1686: 1683: 1668: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1589: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1541: 1538: 1527: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1494: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1475: 1474: 1450: 1449: 1390: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1347: 1344: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1294:Kirill Lokshin 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1239: 1220: 1164: 1161: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1088: 1085: 1072: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1055:(The Rebel At) 1021:(The Rebel At) 1013: 1010: 984: 981: 960: 957: 945: 944: 915: 904: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 888: 864: 861: 860: 859: 847: 846: 837: 821: 810: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 774:Sweden project 768: 765: 764: 763: 739: 736: 712: 709: 694: 691: 690: 689: 680: 657: 654: 653: 652: 637:Kirill Lokshin 621:Kirill Lokshin 605: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 523: 517: 516: 515: 488: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 436: 427: 374: 369: 368: 367: 362:Kirill Lokshin 352:Kirill Lokshin 348:my new article 343: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 226: 225: 224: 217: 214: 211: 205: 204: 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 167:non-specialist 126: 123: 122: 121: 120: 119: 118: 117: 116: 115: 58: 55: 54: 53: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3881: 3872: 3871: 3868: 3860: 3856: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3839: 3835: 3827: 3823: 3820: 3815: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3803: 3798: 3788: 3784: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3767: 3763: 3755: 3753: 3752: 3748: 3745: 3740: 3735: 3727: 3723: 3720: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3710: 3706: 3703: 3687: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3671: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3662: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3652: 3648: 3640: 3638: 3637: 3634: 3631: 3622: 3618: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3601: 3594: 3592: 3591: 3588: 3584: 3578: 3576: 3575: 3572: 3565: 3562: 3560: 3559: 3556: 3551: 3549: 3545: 3544:Dear plange, 3539: 3537: 3536: 3533: 3525: 3522: 3518: 3515: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3488: 3485: 3483: 3482: 3479: 3475: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3442: 3436: 3433: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3397: 3396:Collab-comics 3386: 3384: 3383: 3380: 3379:Badbilltucker 3372: 3370: 3369: 3366: 3358: 3354: 3348: 3345: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3317: 3314: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3287: 3281: 3274: 3270: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3253: 3249: 3240: 3238: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3228: 3223: 3216: 3205: 3203: 3201: 3198: 3192: 3189: 3188: 3179: 3175: 3172: 3167: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3157: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3108: 3105: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3081: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3056: 3046: 3043: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3033: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3024: 3022: 3017: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3006: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2996: 2994: 2989: 2980: 2977: 2973: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2954: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2944: 2937: 2934: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2924: 2914: 2911: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2897: 2894: 2891: 2886: 2881: 2878: 2871: 2869: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2848: 2846: 2845: 2842: 2838: 2830: 2828: 2827: 2823: 2818: 2813: 2808: 2792: 2789: 2785: 2784: 2777: 2776: 2771: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2754: 2750: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2698: 2695: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2645: 2637: 2633: 2630: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2613: 2610: 2607: 2604: 2602: 2597: 2596:Hi Plange... 2591: 2589: 2588: 2585: 2581: 2572: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2537: 2530: 2527: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2501: 2497: 2495: 2489: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2477: 2470: 2467: 2463: 2458: 2456: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2432: 2430: 2427: 2425: 2420: 2418: 2413: 2407: 2403: 2400: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2390: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2378: 2377: 2374: 2371: 2367: 2365: 2362: 2358: 2355: 2354: 2349: 2343: 2342: 2339: 2330: 2328: 2327: 2324: 2316: 2314: 2313: 2308: 2303: 2295: 2291: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2275: 2271: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2260: 2251: 2247: 2244: 2240: 2239: 2235: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2213: 2210: 2206: 2205: 2200: 2199:Steven Hassan 2196: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2185: 2181: 2178: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2167: 2166: 2163: 2158: 2152:Jackie McLean 2151: 2149: 2148: 2145: 2137: 2135: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2035: 2034:Visual Studio 2031: 2030: 2029: 2026: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2011: 2008: 2006: 2003: 1998: 1996: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1965: 1963: 1962: 1959: 1955: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1918: 1912: 1909: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1900: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1890: 1881: 1877: 1869: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1809: 1804: 1800: 1792: 1790: 1789: 1786: 1777: 1775: 1774: 1771: 1767: 1761: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1723: 1721: 1720: 1717: 1709: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1692: 1684: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1667: 1663: 1657: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1606: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1593: 1587: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1548: 1545: 1539: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1525: 1521: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1492: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1465:BLP talk page 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1448: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1388: 1384: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1351: 1345: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1324: 1319: 1314: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1274:Please visit 1273: 1271: 1260: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1226: 1221: 1219: 1214: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1193: 1188: 1184: 1179: 1178:User:Kingboyk 1174: 1170: 1162: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1100:from this... 1098: 1095: 1092: 1086: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1071: 1068: 1062: 1059: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1011: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1000: 997: 996: 990: 982: 980: 979: 976: 972: 968: 966: 958: 956: 955: 952: 942: 938: 937: 936: 930: 929: 928:Did you know? 924: 920: 916: 913: 909: 908: 902: 896: 893: 889: 886: 885: 884: 881: 876: 875: 874: 873: 870: 863:Put the star! 862: 858: 855: 851: 850: 845: 844: 840: 836: 830: 826: 822: 819: 815: 814: 808: 802: 799: 794: 793: 792: 789: 785: 784: 783: 782: 779: 775: 766: 762: 759: 755: 754: 753: 752: 749: 744: 737: 735: 733: 729: 723: 720: 719: 710: 708: 707: 704: 700: 692: 688: 685: 682:OK, thanks. 681: 679: 676: 672: 671: 670: 669: 666: 663: 655: 651: 648: 644: 643: 642: 641: 638: 633: 630: 625: 622: 618: 616: 610: 603: 590: 589: 588: 585: 581: 577: 573: 572: 571: 568: 564: 563: 562: 559: 558: 553: 552: 551: 548: 544: 543: 542: 541: 538: 537: 532: 528: 521: 518: 514: 511: 506: 505: 504: 502: 499: 495: 486: 478: 475: 471: 470: 469: 466: 462: 458: 457: 456: 453: 448: 443: 437: 435: 432: 428: 426: 423: 418: 413: 407: 406: 405: 404: 401: 396: 391: 384: 380: 373: 370: 366: 363: 359: 358: 357: 356: 353: 349: 341: 335: 332: 328: 327: 326: 323: 319: 318: 317: 316: 313: 302: 299: 295: 291: 290: 289: 286: 281: 280: 279: 276: 271: 270: 269: 268: 265: 260: 249: 246: 241: 240: 239: 236: 232: 227: 222: 218: 215: 212: 209: 208: 206: 198: 195: 191: 190: 189: 186: 182: 178: 177: 176: 173: 168: 163: 162: 161: 158: 153: 152: 151: 148: 143: 142: 141: 140: 137: 133: 124: 114: 111: 107: 106: 105: 102: 98: 97: 96: 93: 89: 84: 83: 82: 79: 75: 70: 69: 68: 67: 64: 56: 52: 49: 45: 44: 43: 42: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 3864: 3831: 3792: 3759: 3731: 3699: 3644: 3626: 3598: 3585: 3582: 3571:Brianyoumans 3568: 3552: 3546: 3543: 3528: 3492: 3471: 3468:Re: Your Bot 3446: 3390: 3376: 3361: 3282: 3278: 3252:Jackbirdsong 3248:such as this 3244: 3232:bananabucket 3225: 3209: 3193: 3185: 3183: 3152: 3082: 3060: 2983: 2940: 2920: 2904: 2892: 2875: 2852: 2834: 2801: 2781: 2773: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2641: 2617: 2614: 2611: 2608: 2605: 2601:Jack Palance 2598: 2595: 2577: 2533: 2510: 2506: 2504: 2493: 2473: 2461: 2423: 2416: 2411: 2388: 2382: 2334: 2320: 2299: 2273: 2259:Jackbirdsong 2255: 2222: 2217: 2202: 2189: 2179: 2170: 2159: 2155: 2141: 2116: 2098: 2094: 2012: 2009: 1999: 1990: 1969: 1951: 1922: 1885: 1796: 1781: 1768: 1765: 1737: 1734: 1727: 1713: 1688: 1685:Johnston (2) 1670: 1607: 1604: 1601: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1543: 1529: 1496: 1451: 1392: 1352: 1349: 1331: 1283: 1268: 1166: 1153: 1150: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1077: 1074: 1015: 991: 986: 969: 964: 962: 948: 933: 932: 926: 866: 832: 828: 770: 745: 741: 724: 716: 714: 696: 659: 634: 631: 628: 613: 575: 556: 535: 525: 493: 490: 376: 345: 309: 258: 256: 230: 220: 166: 131: 128: 60: 35: 32: 3780:RelHistBuff 3766:RelHistBuff 3499:Yannismarou 3487:Mitt Romney 3418:Steve block 3403:Steve block 3357:Al Gore III 3215:deletedpage 3057:Bio project 2923:Yannismarou 2910:Yannismarou 2901:Yannismarou 2837:Peter Dupas 2580:Merovingian 2227:User:Plange 2195:User:Plange 2184:User:Plange 1926:—Preceding 1880:Peter Dupas 1766:Thank you. 1507:RelHistBuff 1493:Peer review 1356:—Preceding 1202:Please see 1119:to this... 869:Yannismarou 461:Condefinism 3838:Yellowdesk 3756:Admin help 3670:Ubergenius 3651:Ubergenius 3503:Yellowdesk 2783:Mark Twain 2780:This week 2749:Mark Twain 2476:UberCryxic 2442:Indeed. ++ 2283:User:Jossi 2252:Al Franken 2120:entry #22 1730:Ben Savage 1641:WP:PEACOCK 1636:WP:PEACOCK 1553:Thanks!!! 1532:AppleRaven 1439:User:Jossi 703:Cbrown1023 656:Music bios 557:Alphachimp 536:Alphachimp 533:. (By me) 3679:Browncoat 3478:WinHunter 3326:≈ jossi ≈ 3197:grafikbot 3131:≈ jossi ≈ 3113:≈ jossi ≈ 3085:≈ jossi ≈ 3067:≈ jossi ≈ 2969:SOADLuver 2962:Congrats! 2908:status.-- 2725:≈ jossi ≈ 2676:≈ jossi ≈ 2654:≈ jossi ≈ 2317:Congrats! 2231:Smeelgova 2209:Smeelgova 2095:encrypted 1097:Example: 919:9 October 728:grafikbot 584:WinHunter 527:PlangeBot 520:PlangeBot 3553:thanks, 3275:Question 3227:Blnguyen 3156:Ilummeen 3042:kingboyk 2841:Blaxthos 2629:kingboyk 2515:kingboyk 2507:own mess 2399:kingboyk 2370:kingboyk 2144:Marskell 2130:kingboyk 2103:kingboyk 2059:kingboyk 2015:kingboyk 2002:kingboyk 1978:stilltim 1958:kingboyk 1940:contribs 1932:Reddyrov 1928:unsigned 1865:kingboyk 1735:Thanks! 1691:Marskell 1588:Reply... 1389:Question 1370:contribs 1358:unsigned 1338:kingboyk 1303:kingboyk 1270:kingboyk 1225:kingboyk 1012:Returned 975:kingboyk 892:kingboyk 748:Marskell 738:Johnston 498:Anarchia 451:akealani 421:akealani 399:akealani 257:I think 235:kingboyk 38:kingboyk 3861:Hannity 3848:be bold 3747:rtinp23 3736:now :) 3734:WP:BRFA 3595:anyone? 3555:Cindery 3365:BusterD 3286:Soybean 2943:Kaldari 2568:BusterD 2435:Errabee 2383:Grafikm 1857:WP:WONK 1575:WP:LEAD 1408:Getaway 1404:Getaway 1362:Ludahai 959:Tagging 522:and AWB 3852:plange 3836:page? 3719:plange 3702:Tawker 3683:plange 3661:plange 3633:(talk) 3614:plange 3612::-) -- 3600:trezjr 3587:trezjr 3514:plange 3459:plange 3449:john k 3432:plange 3344:Kuzaar 3322:WP:ANI 3313:plange 3303:Kuzaar 3266:plange 3262:WP:BLP 3206:repost 3171:plange 3104:plange 3032:plange 3005:plange 2979:WP:AIV 2953:plange 2933:plange 2791:status 2755:winner 2753:WP:AID 2694:plange 2644:plange 2619:trezjr 2536:Jayjg 2526:plange 2338:Taxman 2287:plange 2279:WP:BLP 2270:WP:BLP 2243:plange 2068:plange 2025:plange 1919:Thanks 1908:plange 1899:plange 1820:plange 1785:Kuzaar 1770:trezjr 1753:plange 1739:trezjr 1701:plange 1653:plange 1619:plange 1609:trezjr 1579:plange 1557:trezjr 1517:plange 1469:plange 1444:plange 1412:Kuzaar 1400:Kuzaar 1396:WP:BLP 1380:plange 1247:plange 1234:plange 1155:trezjr 1138:plange 1127:trezjr 1078:Khukri 1042:plange 1034:portal 880:plange 854:plange 835:NCurse 829:91/1/4 809:My RfA 788:plange 758:plange 675:plange 647:plange 567:plange 547:plange 510:plange 474:plange 465:plange 431:plange 383:Google 379:db-bio 350:! ;-) 331:plange 312:plange 294:WP:FAR 147:plange 48:plange 3776:WP:DR 3709:Redux 3532:Dwain 3149:Finns 2859:Sandy 2855:here: 2559:Nat91 2548:EVula 2494:speak 2487:T REX 2462:Samir 2323:EVula 2138:Award 1956:). -- 1716:Nat91 1649:WP:OR 1645:WP:OR 1632:WP:OR 1628:WP:RS 1571:WP:OR 1430:WP:RS 1334:I got 1256:EVula 1087:Leads 684:Sandy 665:Sandy 494:about 322:Sandy 298:Sandy 275:Sandy 245:Sandy 185:Sandy 157:Sandy 110:Sandy 101:Sandy 92:Sandy 78:Sandy 63:Sandy 16:< 3813:Kyok 3796:Kyok 3422:Talk 3407:Talk 3293:and 3184:The 3020:Dude 3015:Koji 2992:Dude 2987:Koji 2863:Talk 2821:Toth 2584:Talk 2465:धर्म 2412:Nish 2307:talk 2302:Aude 2057:. -- 1936:talk 1889:Agne 1834:talk 1829:Aude 1808:talk 1803:Aude 1801:? -- 1728:The 1677:Gh87 1634:and 1434:WP:V 1432:and 1402:and 1366:talk 1318:talk 1313:Aude 1213:talk 1208:Aude 1192:talk 1187:Aude 1185:. -- 1183:here 1163:RFA? 1040:? -- 1003:tock 989:Ashi 951:Peta 923:2006 839:work 715:The 693:Post 285:Agne 264:Agne 231:good 194:Agne 172:Agne 136:Agne 88:WP:V 57:Cite 3867:PTR 3443:Bot 2899:I, 2444:Lar 2417:kid 2281:is 1861:JzG 1482:PTR 1455:PTR 1416:PTR 1410:by 999:aka 917:On 903:DYK 825:RfA 798:Pia 778:Pia 730:-- 531:AWB 3630:MP 3399:}} 3393:{{ 3332:• 3324:. 3234:) 3224:. 3218:}} 3212:{{ 3137:• 3119:• 3091:• 3073:• 2915:} 2865:) 2731:• 2717:IE 2682:• 2660:• 2603:. 2582:※ 2446:: 2424:64 2397:-- 2099:my 2053:, 2049:, 2000:-- 1942:) 1938:• 1751:-- 1453:-- 1372:) 1368:• 1311:-- 1223:-- 1136:-- 1053:~ 1019:~ 973:-- 949:-- 943:. 925:, 921:, 878:-- 701:. 619:. 508:-- 503:) 3818:o 3801:o 3743:a 3739:M 3334:@ 3330:t 3230:( 3139:@ 3135:t 3121:@ 3117:t 3093:@ 3089:t 3075:@ 3071:t 2861:( 2816:a 2811:z 2806:A 2803:→ 2793:. 2778:. 2733:@ 2729:t 2684:@ 2680:t 2662:@ 2658:t 2511:I 2452:c 2450:/ 2448:t 2309:) 2305:( 2236:. 2214:. 1934:( 1882:? 1836:) 1832:( 1810:) 1806:( 1364:( 1320:) 1316:( 1215:) 1211:( 1194:) 1190:( 1057:~ 1023:~ 994:b 965:I 446:e 441:K 416:e 411:K 394:e 389:K 223:. 221:B

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index