Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Pperos/archive1

Source 📝

297:
immediately. If I have a fact to insert or point to make, the primary thing is to make or insert it. Then someone else can smooth it along, or i may do so myself when I have more time, or after leaving the piece and re-reading it. It can be quite difficult to write good prose in one go, because you do not spot your mistakes. As to our last exchange in Severus Snape, yes I agree, I put in a clumsy statement, but I was trying to express a particular point. You improved the flow, but slightly altered my point. I changed it again, back a little to my original intention, though you also added something. Cheers. 17:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
347:
no, this is quite fun. It's boring when we get stuck on simply reverting each other. I didn't change the name on purpose (or not consciously): in fact I totally agree about varying words whenever possible, but I may have a reservation about referring to the same person by a different name. OK for us,
329:
As to your comments about this instance, I think you are actually right about the lexical ambiguity of the pronoun referring either to Snape or Harry being defended by Lily. But contextually I think it is pretty clear that it was Snape. Nevertheless your edit - changing 'him' to 'Snape' - sits better
772:
Yes, I had a creeping feeling I might be wrong about the Tube, but the main point which I made in the edit summary was that the edit was unencyclopaedic POV with no source and bad style. Do add something about the historic Tube links if it's not already there - you are clearly more of an expert than
729:
Er, thanks for your input, but I think we'd put this one to bed. My principal stance was that I made a good faith edit on personal preference, either expression had its justifications, and nobody was going to die over it. The perils of editing Doctor Who articles, eh. (And please do sign your posts
717:
Peeper: The comparison is weak. Your examples are idiomatic expressions, not single words. Sticklers object to these phrases (because they are technically nonsensical). I do not. "Booking a table" is both shorter and less formal than "making a reservation." To me, this constitutes sufficient reason
300:
Unfortunately, I just read your last edit. Actually the sentence you just put in says that Lily defended Harry against Dudley and Draco. OOps. Which is why I repeated use of Snapes name when I wrote it: because it is not clear whether the pronoun refers to the subject of the sentence, Harry, or the
809:
I have been considering whether I should create a new Category/Project page. I am not sure that social work truly falls in the Sociology realm. Even if it remains in that category, I think it should have its own subcategory. I would be curious about your thoughts. I think having a project page
792:
article. If you are a social worker, you may consider adding youself to the Wikipedians with MSW degrees or Wikipedian Social Workers categories. I am trying to get more people in this field, interested in working on the social work related Knowledge (XXG) articles. If you have any questions, just
296:
Edits on wiki improve by evolution: only the best survives. They become best by change after change after change. I find I make two kinds of edits. Ones which add content, and ones which improve language. I fancy I am quite good at writing smooth prose, but very often it is not possible to do this
556:
While you were correct to change "Thai PM Shinawatra" to "Thai PM Thaksin", you were incorrect in saying that Thaksin is his surname. Thaksin is his given name, Shinawatra is his family name or surname. Thais, however, always use their given name as the public form of their name. It is as if the
718:
for both phrases to exist. In contrast, "reference" used as a verb means exactly the same thing as "refer to." A better, though still imperfect, comparison would be the inexplicable addition of a useless syllable to "oriented" (orientATed) - again, same meaning. Tom: Consult a dictionary. ~NJ
501:
Hi Pperos! Thanks for the write-up on the Making Your Mind Up 2006. One thing bothers me - if mobile voting a texting were announced separately, what were the regional scores based on? Fixed-line televoting? If so, I believe the article should mention it, I found ti confusing. Thanks,
670:
Fascinated by your comment on a Doctor Who page that "reference" is not a verb. Do you also refuse to talk about "footing the bill", "heading a task force", "facing a problem", "chairing a meeting", "tabling an amendment", "booking a table" and countless others? Just curious. ;-)
428:
Hi and many thanks for filling out the page on lac de cavayere i had started. Can i ask are you local to carcassonne..is that where you got the info or did you surf the net or other sources? Wondered if you knew if the algae problem they had this summer had cleared up?
337:
individuals mentioned, which makes difficult writing when you want to refer back to any of them - Harry, James, Sirius, Severus, Dudley, Draco and Lily. But what we have done so far seems good. As long as you don't mind the give-and-take, neither do I! Cheers,
604:, this does sound like the sort of thing that e-mail filters do. Anyone who has used public library computers knows just how fussy and sometimes paranoid the obscenity filters can be, so I am inclined to believe this report.-- 486:
Your edit may well be in line with wikipedia policy (i'm not so well versed in these things) but i wondered if your edit might be a mistake, seeing as the article begins, "David Tennant (born David McDonald, April 18, 1971)
321:
Hey Sandpiper, thanks for your comments. I hope you didn't feel I was being critical, just doing exactly the kind of iterative wiki process you set out in your first post here. I totally agree that it's a process and
348:
but might be confusing for someone not familar with the subject. Sort of thing I might think about if I read it again from the start. Well, this does condense 3 or more pages from the book into two sentences.
179:
asking if your edits were ok. They looked good to me. Don't be afraid to contribute more in the future. The article needs some work and if you have an interest in it... go for it!!
618:
Hey there. I re wrote your rewrite to clarfy the facts better. There were a few items that you listed as citation needed which were already cited. Also, Derek Jacobi is appearing in
384:
I have Tourette's by proxy, a disorder made worse by years of institutional abuse; when I saw you were part of the social work apparatus, I couldn't help but vandalise your page.
741:
In the end, your choice of words is just that - your choice. I just felt you deserved an explanation /reply - I don't like to criticize and run. :) 01:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
251:
Ta muchly. It can get terribly boring, all those stray commas, extra =s and stream-of-consciousness sentences that people insist on adding. Glad to have raised a smile!
368:
Pperos, I am sorry that I edited your page earlier in the week. It was wrong of me, and I shouldn't have done it. I will never do it again. I hope you will forgive me.
273: 351:
Just checked the page to see if you had changed anything and lo! 6 edits by someone anon. Some more exciting theories about what DD and Harry thought. What fun.
41:! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: 596:
whose writer had experienced a problem with e-mail filters after referring to Irina Slutskaya. Although I try to avoid including material which could be a
333:
I think there may be a problem with a 'train-wreck' of proper nouns and pronouns at the end of the sentence though - within three lines, there are actually
445: 53: 839:. I have begun to work on this project and I would love to have your help. Please take a look at it and consider joining the project. Many thanks, 89: 330:
when the preceding pronoun is not 'Snape' but 'Severus' -the sense is the same but stylistically it is much more comfortable. We're getting there!
513: 810:
would help us decide if we wanted to split the article into country specific articles or if we wanted to continue with the current structure.
111: 282: 505: 238: 125: 836: 759: 542: 285:
to Pperos for tireless work on improving grammar, wordings, and other small but vital elements of various Harry Potter articles.
85: 79: 75: 32: 530: 323: 310:
Actually, james seems to have been rather nastier than Sirius, and certainly Lily thought so. Am still thinking about that.
279: 137: 99: 71: 105: 696:
For the record, unlike the above examples, there is a more appropriate usage - I refer, of course, to "refer to." ~NJ
469: 441: 272: 133: 64: 46: 234: 195: 387:
I know now that you strive to improve social work standards, and am deeply ashamed of myself. Sorry, brother.
121: 631: 656: 95: 700: 672: 634:. Apparently the description I wrote was not adequate to explain that so I've made it more specific.-- 844: 815: 794: 538: 372: 452:
article? If so, could you speedy delete the article or otherwise move it to your user page. Thanks.
619: 226: 762:, until 1982, and services there pre-dated the Met service to Watford by something like 10 years. 508: 627: 623: 567: 456: 161: 152: 516: 129: 652: 180: 17: 512: 840: 811: 798: 635: 579: 534: 558: 430: 352: 315: 311: 302: 198:. Always good to have people talented with consolidating article narrative on board. -- 763: 453: 147: 504: 605: 601: 488: 449: 412: 400: 199: 38: 789: 774: 731: 709: 686: 473: 339: 252: 207: 176: 848: 819: 801: 777: 766: 734: 712: 703: 689: 675: 660: 638: 608: 561: 546: 519: 491: 476: 458: 415: 403: 375: 355: 342: 305: 255: 243: 210: 575: 755: 751: 314:
No, maybe that is essentially implied already. Complicated game, eh?
128:. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the 597: 584: 164:
if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
578:
newspaper reported that e-mails mentioning the ice skater
582:
were often blocked due to the inclusion of the substring
682: 649: 396: 222: 395:
hey there... just thought i'd let you know i reverted
124:. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind 448:. What to do with it? Is it already merged with the 750:You were quite right to revert the recent edit to 371:Edit at a later date - Sorry, forgot to sign it -- 754:, but you reasoning is not entirely correct. The 301:male mentioned in the subordinate clause, Snape. 472:. Neutrality of WP is dying, please save it! 8: 60:so others will know who left which comments. 557:British were to say "Prime Minister Tony." 592:This is based on a reader's letter in the 446:User:Bluemoose/Uncategorised good articles 440:Hi, I encountered this page you created, 758:line did go to Watford, specifically to 160:P.S. Feel free to leave a message on 120:I hope you enjoy editing and being a 49:and tell others a bit about yourself. 7: 699:What's "more appropriate" about it? 45:If you haven't already, drop by the 835:I have created a new WikiProject, 788:You have shown an interest in the 685:, referencing your above comment. 24: 511: 503: 271: 202:13:03, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 175:Hey... saw your comment on the 562:11:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 468:Hi, Here is a vote related to 1: 477:07:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 459:01:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 416:13:02, 16 November 2005 (UTC) 404:12:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC) 376:11:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC) 221:Thanks for keeping RC patrol 211:14:34, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 183:00:28, August 12, 2005 (UTC) 626:. Simm is appearing in both 529:Thanks. I've replied on the 391:Vandalism of your User page. 356:18:30, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 343:18:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 306:17:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 256:10:38, 14 October 2005 (UTC) 31:Hello, Pperos/archive1, and 784:Calling All Social Workers! 648:By being bold you did well. 442:Makarios III/proposed entry 244:12:16, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 157:16:03, July 26, 2005 (UTC) 126:what Knowledge (XXG) is not 869: 661:11:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 639:14:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 547:22:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 206:Thanks! Much appreciated. 849:05:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 820:06:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 735:09:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 609:11:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 492:13:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 140:can also be very useful. 132:or add a question to the 110:And finally, remember to 802:05:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 778:10:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 767:09:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 713:21:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 704:21:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 690:17:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 681:I've written a response 676:20:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 520:00:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 196:Harry Potter (character) 190:Harry Potter (character) 96:Knowledge (XXG) tutorial 837:WikiProject Social Work 644:Abercrombie & Fitch 632:Last of the Time Lords 525:Girl in the Fireplace 90:write a great article 399:of your user page! 326:when editing edits! 56:on talk pages with 793:post a note on my 628:The Sound of Drums 624:The Sound of Drums 568:Scunthorpe Problem 552:Thaksin Shinawatra 497:UK in the 2006 ESC 411:why thankyou! :o) 324:mean no disrespect 116:in updating pages! 80:simplified ruleset 67:of Knowledge (XXG) 847: 818: 289: 288: 242: 860: 843: 814: 760:Watford Junction 574:A reader of the 515: 507: 275: 268: 267: 232: 230: 155: 150: 138:Community Portal 100:picture tutorial 59: 18:User talk:Pperos 868: 867: 863: 862: 861: 859: 858: 857: 786: 748: 668: 646: 616: 580:Irina Slutskaya 571: 554: 527: 499: 484: 466: 438: 426: 424:Lac de Cavayere 393: 366: 294: 266: 228: 219: 192: 181:Granite T. Rock 173: 153: 148: 143:Happy editing! 106:Manual of Style 57: 54:sign your posts 39:Knowledge (XXG) 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 866: 864: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 827: 825: 824: 823: 822: 785: 782: 781: 780: 747: 744: 743: 742: 738: 737: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 693: 692: 667: 664: 645: 642: 615: 612: 590: 589: 570: 565: 553: 550: 526: 523: 498: 495: 483: 480: 470:Western Sahara 465: 462: 437: 434: 425: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 392: 389: 382: 380: 365: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 349: 331: 327: 293: 290: 287: 286: 276: 265: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 218: 215: 214: 213: 191: 188: 186: 172: 171:Welcome Aboard 169: 167: 118: 117: 108: 102: 92: 82: 68: 61: 50: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 865: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 821: 817: 813: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 800: 796: 791: 783: 779: 776: 771: 770: 769: 768: 765: 761: 757: 753: 745: 740: 739: 736: 733: 728: 727: 716: 715: 714: 711: 707: 706: 705: 702: 698: 697: 695: 694: 691: 688: 684: 680: 679: 678: 677: 674: 665: 663: 662: 658: 654: 650: 643: 641: 640: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 613: 611: 610: 607: 603: 599: 595: 587: 586: 581: 577: 573: 572: 569: 566: 564: 563: 560: 551: 549: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 524: 522: 521: 518: 514: 510: 506: 496: 494: 493: 490: 482:David Tennant 481: 479: 478: 475: 471: 463: 461: 460: 457: 455: 451: 447: 443: 435: 433: 432: 423: 417: 414: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 402: 398: 390: 388: 385: 381: 378: 377: 374: 369: 363: 357: 354: 350: 346: 345: 344: 341: 336: 332: 328: 325: 320: 319: 318: 317: 313: 308: 307: 304: 298: 291: 284: 281: 280:Working Man's 277: 274: 270: 269: 263: 257: 254: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 240: 236: 231: 224: 216: 212: 209: 205: 204: 203: 201: 197: 194:Nice edit on 189: 187: 184: 182: 178: 170: 168: 165: 163: 158: 156: 151: 144: 141: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 115: 114: 109: 107: 103: 101: 97: 93: 91: 87: 83: 81: 77: 73: 69: 66: 62: 55: 51: 48: 44: 43: 42: 40: 36: 35: 26: 19: 826: 787: 749: 730:with ~~~~). 669: 647: 617: 602:urban legend 593: 591: 583: 555: 528: 500: 485: 467: 450:Makarios III 439: 436:Makarios III 427: 394: 386: 383: 379: 370: 367: 334: 309: 299: 295: 278:I award the 220: 217:Heeheehee... 193: 185: 174: 166: 162:my talk page 159: 145: 142: 134:village pump 119: 112: 65:Five Pillars 47:new user log 33: 30: 790:Social Work 773:I! Cheers. 701:Tomsalinsky 673:Tomsalinsky 653:Will Beback 517:Talk to me! 223:interesting 177:Social Work 86:edit a page 841:Ursasapien 812:Ursasapien 799:Ursasapien 636:Dr who1975 614:The Master 594:Daily Mail 576:Daily Mail 535:khaosworks 373:neoballmon 364:An Apology 130:help pages 122:Wikipedian 104:The handy 76:guidelines 795:talk page 651:Cheers, - 531:talk page 431:Collieman 397:vandalism 353:Sandpiper 316:Sandpiper 312:Sandpiper 303:Sandpiper 227:A Man In 764:Emeraude 756:Bakerloo 622:... not 543:contribs 454:Garion96 283:Barnstar 264:Barnstar 239:past ops 235:conspire 72:policies 27:Welcome! 752:Watford 746:Watford 606:Ianmacm 509:Bravada 413:UkPaolo 401:UkPaolo 292:Editing 200:AceMyth 113:be bold 84:How to 52:Always 34:welcome 845:(talk) 816:(talk) 775:Peeper 732:Peeper 710:Peeper 687:Peeper 620:Utopia 600:or an 474:Daryou 340:Peeper 253:Peeper 208:Peeper 136:. The 78:, and 708:Wha? 666:Verbs 335:seven 229:Black 149:Sango 16:< 683:here 630:and 598:hoax 585:slut 559:Adam 539:talk 533:. -- 487:is". 225:. - 98:and 94:The 88:and 70:Our 63:The 58:~~~~ 489:Amo 444:on 154:123 146:-- 37:to 797:. 659:· 655:· 588:. 545:) 541:• 464:WS 237:| 74:, 657:† 537:( 241:) 233:(

Index

User talk:Pperos
welcome
Knowledge (XXG)
new user log
sign your posts
Five Pillars
policies
guidelines
simplified ruleset
edit a page
write a great article
Knowledge (XXG) tutorial
picture tutorial
Manual of Style
be bold
Wikipedian
what Knowledge (XXG) is not
help pages
village pump
Community Portal
Sango
123
my talk page
Social Work
Granite T. Rock
Harry Potter (character)
AceMyth
Peeper
14:34, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
interesting

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.