899:. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the
1304:
1168:
mostly along with being recognized by the City of
Mukilteo as an upstanding citizen -- which I didn't add because it wasn't published. I'm just the messenger for the discussion board here, and at the point at which nothing else on this page is cited (unfortunately) and Bergen has received such unanimous praise on the board, could you please let the edits be?
778:) a final warning, I saw you had given them a warning for removing comment from their talk page. Actually, removing comments from one's own talk page is not considered vandalism - it was at one point but the consensus has since changed. Of course, removing comments from any other talk page can still be vandalism, as can editing other people's comments.
995:
1209:
he was a sexual predator would be. Secondly, anything which is untrue could be regarded as negative, so by your definition, I would say that anything which could potentially be untrue is libel. Do you really want people to go around deleting everything that hasn't been cited? What kind of mark would that give
Knowledge (XXG) the institution?
557:
1208:
Thanks for addressing my points. Well according to the
Knowledge (XXG) on defamation which includes libel, it's stating things which are known to be false in order to give a negative image. Firstly, I don't see how saying someone has womanizing tendencies is particularly negative as, say, saying that
157:
Thank you for contacting me. After analysing the situation again it became obvious that there's an actual edit war erupting in the article due to content dispute. At the moment I am more inclined to fully protect the article rather than unprotecting it. I suggest that you discuss the disputed content
1189:
on this page is cited. On several pages, nothing is cited, yet you choose to scrutinize this one where so many people have come forth in agreement on the subject of B. Bergen. Are you going to delete everything else in this article? You may think that you can roll over me and that my opinion doesn't
829:
March 2007 This is your only warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Locked-In syndrome, you will be blocked from editing
Knowledge (XXG). Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Knowledge (XXG) and other sites that use
790:
It's an unbelievably common mistake. Because removing warnings was considered vandalism for quite some time, many people are used to that. There are regular questions at the administrator's noticeboards about it, as well as various other places, such as the talk page for user warnings and probably
1167:
I see, but I didn't write that at all. I just put it back up when vandals took it down because I know who B. Bergen is, and so does everyone who has posted on the discussion board. Maybe those who took him down did so because "womanizing tendencies" sounds fishy, but that is what he's known for
311:
When I report someone to AIV, I always keep a close eye on their talk pages and contributions so I can quickly revert their next edits, no matter where they may be, and so I know when someone got blocked, so I can stop vandalstalking them. ;3 PumeleonT 08:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
344:. If you would like to be listed as a party, please write your name in the blue box. If you feel you are not involved, please remove your name from the list under "Who's involved?". (In this case, your name will only be allowed to be reinserted if a reason is given.) —
1139:
Hi. Sorry for not citing any sources but I'm afraid with regard to this high school, there aren't that many published articles to be found. I'm just acting on behalf of what the discussion board has agreed to. Could you please stop deleting my additions?
393:
No problemo on that one :) I wonder if some of these anon isp's acutally just put stuff like that (gay sex) into their summaries to see if we're actually paying attention! I've had to reverse myself a couple of times on some on-the-cusp type of edits!
254:
Man, you're fast! I just put that up a few hours ago. But yes, that would be awesome. :3 I've been on RC patrol for a lot of the day, reverting and warning, contributing to AfDs and such. And thank you for offering to help a newbie out.
25:
Hello, and thank you for sparing the article. DM Ashura's fanbase thanks you, however, I disagree with your tagging of the site to be unreliable, as the sources meet reliability criteria. I explain more deeply (and with more passion) on
341:
238:
Hey there, I see from your user page that you're looking for an adopter? I took a quick look at your edits and I certainly like the temperment I saw. If you'd like, I'd be more than willing to do the adopting. Lemme know. :)
833:
I have just received the above message. Please explain how a link to a private website belonging to a person who has experienced locked-in syndrome, and accepts speaking engagements on that topic, can be considered spam.
1019:
the newcomer when you don't have to. give him a few minutes to at least make a claim of notability. If it comes to deleting the article he can be told politely that while we appreciate his effort we aren't interested.
525:
vice this proposal of yours? I didn't have the time to look into the AFD and back track, but that seems to be the better plan, and you might consider dropping an appeal on the talk page for the
Military History Project.
735:
I wouldn't worry about doing a RFCU on them. Most likely it's just someone trolling the new accounts log - happens all the time - and the autoblock will catch them if they try to edit. They'll get bored pretty quickly.
1193:
Yes, he is worthy of note, which is why so many people have put him back on the page. Who is to deem what is worthy of note? It should be the many people who have come forth on this discussion board rather than you.
1254:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1171:
After I wrote this I noticed that someone else had taken the liberty of putting him back. Can't such a popular upheaval be granted worth when published sources are unavailable. Thanks for your help.
307:
Thanks! How the heck did you notice that? Anyway, I've fixed it now. Being too quick to use my own popups warning-extension was my downfall... Doh! -- Renesis (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
354:
210:
I thought that the subject herself was the one who was married to all of that nobility in the second paragraph, hence my comment. I blew that one big time. I am SO sorry about the comment. -
1112:
Good point. I've gone ahead and protected the page for the duration of the block. This guy's quite a piece of work - we'll see if it starts up again from the same IP after the week is up.--
303:
You may want to double-check your block notice at User talk:128.113.228.7. Muhammed Iqbal dosn't seem like any amount of time I've ever heard of. :P PumeleonT 08:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
1331:, the the article’s one citation that discusses the DSSA is a copy of a letter written by the DSSA. The only (possibly) reliable, independent source I could find is the bottom matter of
1212:
According to your x and y argument, I may not be able to tell you to delete anything that isn't cited, but I could do so myself and I could give you the same argument. Please clarify.
1190:
matter but I speak for the dozens of people who have been moved by B. Bergen's work and I will not give this up until he is left alone on the page and honored as he should be.
357:). Since I have not been asked by anyone to investigate this case, I will not pursue it any further. I'm not watching your user page anymore, so please let me know on
702:
Hi
Pumeleon - thanks for the advice. I'll add a paragraph with her articles, which will hopefully highlight her notability - hope it meets the criteria! Cheers.
340:
A mediation case has been opened in which your name is mentioned. I just signed up as a mediator, pending approval by the involved parties. Please take a look at
158:
on the talk page and try to reach some consensus there instead of warring about it. If the edit war continues I will have to fully protect the article. Regards.--
635:
bad, it'll usually get deleted no matter what reason you give. ;) But for practical purpose, I guess whichever feels more appropriate is good. Or just use
320:... I saw their vandalism at the main page article, then contributions and talk page last warning, and decided to block. Well, anyway, thanks again! --
446:
413:
78:
1385:
112:
1279:
1332:
1054:
971:
1156:
862:
443:
Received your messages, and fully understood. I've now read through the majority of the terms and use and understand. Regards, Gmailj
425:
1389:
132:! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the
88:
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
1364:
1275:
775:
270:
117:
97:
69:
458:
73:
1377:
1317:
1291:
945:
940:
926:
1313:
1295:
534:. If nothing else, it will draw some critical (and sharp) talent to morph it into something more suitable. Best wishes //
353:
Update: The original case has been deleted by an involved party. I reported this incidend on administrators' noticeboard (
1381:
107:
681:
1266:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
122:
1271:
1093:
1076:
676:
That was aimed more at the fact that we'd both managed to slip a "final warning" on at roughly the same time. :-)
266:
979:
963:
527:
137:
92:
578:
565:
191:
129:
1089:
1072:
1071:
I was unaware of this, I was just told this by one of the people that invited him to the con. My apologies.
1050:
496:
358:
1144:
1042:
850:
76:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
1220:
1199:
1176:
1152:
858:
421:
1393:
1267:
1046:
915:
896:
655:
278:
244:
165:
1216:
1195:
1172:
1148:
892:
888:
887:
Hello
Pumeleon, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as
879:
854:
668:
531:
417:
102:
563:
For your contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted
1401:
1243:
1232:
791:
the talk page for the vandalism policy as well. No worries - you are in good company in your error!
765:
769:
450:
325:
196:
49:
1263:
1247:
1119:
639:
593:
540:
487:
454:
362:
345:
225:
1360:
811:
792:
779:
744:
376:
1259:
1251:
1016:
133:
984:
955:
912:
900:
647:
480:
274:
240:
170:
1347:
1328:
1262:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1255:
317:
1397:
520:
1038:
Dude, it's neelix. I don't wanna post my e-mail here, but give me a way to contact you!!
613:
No problem, I can see why you thought that it's nonsense! Thanks for the apology though
967:
321:
228:
211:
188:
82:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
45:
41:
27:
1346:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
1114:
908:
715:
587:
536:
471:
395:
289:
256:
31:
959:
738:
677:
571:
214:
1021:
342:
Knowledge (XXG):Mediation Cabal/Cases/User:Lucky 6.9 reverting his own Talk page
160:
141:
830:
the MediaWiki spam blacklist at all. PumeleonT 21:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)<
614:
404:
386:
545:
951:
944:
is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to
507:
if you took care to build a discussion on one talk page or the other with a
151:
18:
1370:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
838:
1250:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
269:? That way we can keep our conversations in one place much like my own
1405:
1283:
1224:
1203:
1180:
1160:
1125:
1097:
1080:
1024:
994:
987:
918:
814:
795:
782:
750:
718:
688:
660:
617:
599:
462:
398:
379:
365:
348:
329:
292:
282:
259:
248:
200:
176:
144:
53:
34:
1336:
966:
status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are
556:
1215:
And if these precedents are established, where can I argue them?
904:
265:
Your response was equally fast. :) Could you create the page
1302:
993:
555:
1088:
Thanks for the clarification, I'm actually both as well :P
978:
You received this one-time invitation because you are a
1388:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
684:
512:
502:
499:
493:
1353:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
224:
Hi. Just letting you know I sent the article to AfD.
1242:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1015:you might be right that it not notable, but why
714:Thanks for catching my goof. Sorry 'bout that!
511:, and add the argument (perameter) linking them
1185:You have failed to respond to my argument that
140:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --
911:. Thanks for your attention and cooperation.
837:You may want to review the link I had added.
645:in serious pinches. Good question, though. –
8:
870:Ah, I see. Thank you for your explanation.
128:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1335:article, which is simply copied from the
361:if you have any questions or concerns. —
410:How can it be libellous if I was there?
1359:notice, but please explain why in your
895:) was found at the following location:
839:http://www.katesjourney.com/index.html
375:No problem... sorry for the trouble.
7:
1314:Dog Show Superintendents Association
1296:Dog Show Superintendents Association
316:I didn't even realize they were at
93:The Five Pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1348:deleted for any of several reasons
1320:because of the following concern:
523:|List of Murphy's Laws of Combat}}
72:to Knowledge (XXG). Thank you for
14:
1268:review the candidates' statements
822:Spam Warning Explanation Needed
271:User:BradBeattie/Admin coaching
1274:. For the Election committee,
1244:Arbitration Committee election
1233:ArbCom elections are now open!
843:I look forward to your reply.
219:
1:
1406:03:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
1284:13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
970:to work on. Give it a go and
950:Our current goal is to raise
938:Looking for something to do?
764:Hey, in the course of giving
625:Re: Quick question about CSD.
463:06:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
399:06:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
380:01:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
366:20:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
349:22:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
330:08:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
293:03:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
283:03:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
260:03:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
249:03:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
229:23:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
215:22:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
201:19:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
177:02:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
1009:Pierbridge - speedy deletion
600:22:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
150:Re. Your semi-protection of
145:01:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
113:How to write a great article
54:12:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
35:04:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
1392:allows discussion to reach
1373:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
1356:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
1270:and submit your choices on
1225:08:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
1204:07:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
1181:07:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
1161:07:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
1126:06:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
907:license or released to the
546:15:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
477:T'would be nice when using
79:New contributors' help page
1422:
1384:exist. In particular, the
1276:MediaWiki message delivery
1098:16:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1081:21:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1057:) 01:47, September 8, 2007
1025:15:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
751:10:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
719:15:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
689:06:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
661:04:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
618:03:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
579:Explanation and Disclaimer
530:(Never mind... I just did
517:What would you think of a
267:User:Pumeleon/Adopt-a-User
1378:proposed deletion process
988:23:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
815:03:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
796:02:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
783:02:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
205:
968:plenty of other articles
919:07:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
136:, add a question to the
1365:the article's talk page
865:) 17:37, April 12, 2007
470:Happy New Year and the
220:Murphy's laws of combat
42:the article's talk page
1342:
1307:
1031:
998:
560:
1390:articles for deletion
1324:
1318:proposed for deletion
1306:
1248:Arbitration Committee
997:
897:User:Pumeleon/Sandbox
631:Hmm. If something is
559:
449:comment was added by
440:MESSAGE FOR PUMALEON
416:comment was added by
28:DM Ashura's talk page
469:
273:page. Sound good? --
1252:arbitration process
708:Reversions and such
566:Random Smiley Award
551:Random Smiley Award
1382:deletion processes
1308:
1264:arbitration policy
1133:Kamiak High School
1106:Re: 207.144.217.39
999:
974:how you're doing!
893:Image:Reunited.png
880:Image:Reunited.png
561:
488:Template:Mergefrom
199:
186:You're welcome ;)
175:
118:Naming conventions
98:How to edit a page
74:your contributions
1409:
1343:
1322:
1309:
1300:
1292:Proposed deletion
1287:
1237:
1228:
1164:
1147:comment added by
1136:
1129:
1109:
1102:
1090:Tomi Undergallows
1084:
1073:Tomi Undergallows
1068:
1061:
1059:
1045:comment added by
1035:
1032:Dude, it's neelix
1028:
1012:
1005:
1003:
1002:
946:have you on board
941:WikiProject Furry
931:
927:WikiProject Furry
922:
884:
875:
867:
853:comment added by
825:
818:
807:
800:
786:
761:
754:
729:
722:
711:
704:
699:
692:
687:
673:
669:user:PinoyGangsta
664:
628:
621:
610:
603:
598:
582:
466:
429:
299:Your block notice
281:
247:
187:
159:
1413:
1375:
1374:
1358:
1357:
1344:
1323:
1310:
1305:
1301:
1288:
1238:
1229:
1163:
1141:
1137:
1130:
1124:
1110:
1103:
1085:
1069:
1062:
1058:
1039:
1036:
1029:
1013:
1006:
980:Furry Wikipedian
956:furry convention
935:
934:
932:
923:
913:User:Gnome (Bot)
901:Creative Commons
885:
876:
866:
847:
826:
819:
808:
801:
787:
762:
755:
747:
741:
732:Heh heh heh :o)
730:
723:
712:
705:
700:
693:
680:
674:
665:
659:
652:
644:
638:
629:
622:
611:
604:
590:
584:
574:
562:
543:
524:
506:
490:
484:
444:
411:
277:
243:
194:
173:
168:
163:
108:Picture tutorial
103:Editing tutorial
86:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1386:speedy deletion
1372:
1371:
1355:
1354:
1303:
1299:
1272:the voting page
1236:
1142:
1135:
1113:
1108:
1067:
1040:
1034:
1011:
1004:
930:
883:
848:
824:
806:
760:
745:
739:
728:
710:
698:
672:
648:
646:
642:
636:
627:
609:
583:
572:
553:
541:
518:
491:
486:
478:
475:
445:—The preceding
438:
412:—The preceding
408:
391:
373:
338:
301:
236:
222:
208:
206:You're right...
192:
184:
171:
166:
161:
155:
123:Manual of Style
84:
62:
23:
17:Re: Tagging of
12:
11:
5:
1419:
1417:
1396:for deletion.
1376:will stop the
1298:
1289:
1241:
1235:
1230:
1134:
1131:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1066:
1063:
1033:
1030:
1010:
1007:
1001:
1000:
991:
933:
929:
924:
882:
877:
823:
820:
805:
802:
799:
798:
759:
756:
727:
724:
709:
706:
697:
694:
671:
666:
626:
623:
608:
605:
576:
570:originated by
569:
554:
552:
549:
516:
474:
468:
437:
434:
432:
407:
402:
390:
383:
372:
369:
337:
334:
333:
332:
309:
308:
300:
297:
296:
295:
263:
262:
235:
232:
221:
218:
207:
204:
183:
180:
154:
148:
126:
125:
120:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
61:
58:
57:
56:
22:
21:as unreliable.
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1418:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1368:
1366:
1362:
1351:
1349:
1341:
1340:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1321:
1319:
1315:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1191:
1188:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1169:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1121:
1116:
1105:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:66.130.39.153
1044:
1027:
1026:
1023:
1018:
1008:
996:
992:
990:
989:
986:
983:
981:
975:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
947:
943:
942:
937:
936:
928:
925:
921:
920:
917:
914:
910:
909:public domain
906:
902:
898:
894:
891:. The image (
890:
881:
878:
874:
871:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
844:
841:
840:
835:
831:
821:
817:
816:
813:
803:
797:
794:
789:
788:
785:
784:
781:
777:
774:
771:
767:
757:
753:
752:
749:
748:
742:
733:
725:
721:
720:
717:
707:
703:
695:
691:
690:
686:
683:
679:
670:
667:
663:
662:
657:
653:
651:
641:
634:
624:
620:
619:
616:
606:
602:
601:
596:
595:
589:
580:
575:
568:
567:
558:
550:
548:
547:
544:
539:
538:
533:
529:
522:
514:
510:
504:
501:
498:
495:
489:
482:
473:
472:Murphy's Laws
467:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
441:
435:
433:
430:
427:
423:
419:
415:
406:
403:
401:
400:
397:
388:
384:
382:
381:
378:
370:
368:
367:
364:
360:
356:
351:
350:
347:
343:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
314:
313:
306:
305:
304:
298:
294:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
261:
258:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
234:Adopt-a-user?
233:
231:
230:
227:
226:Pascal.Tesson
217:
216:
213:
203:
202:
198:
195:
190:
181:
179:
178:
174:
169:
164:
153:
149:
147:
146:
143:
139:
135:
131:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
90:
89:
87:
81:
80:
75:
71:
67:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
38:
37:
36:
33:
30:. Thank you.
29:
20:
16:
1380:, but other
1369:
1361:edit summary
1352:
1345:
1337:DSSA website
1326:
1325:
1312:The article
1311:
1239:
1217:Chuck.gamble
1214:
1211:
1207:
1196:Chuck.gamble
1192:
1186:
1184:
1173:Chuck.gamble
1170:
1166:
1149:Chuck.gamble
1138:
1117:
1111:
1070:
1065:RE DM Ashura
1041:— Preceding
1037:
1014:
977:
976:
964:good article
960:furry fandom
949:
939:
886:
872:
869:
855:69.15.188.98
849:— Preceding
845:
842:
836:
832:
827:
809:
772:
763:
737:
734:
731:
713:
701:
675:
649:
632:
630:
612:
592:
585:
564:
535:
508:
476:
442:
439:
431:
418:82.6.114.111
409:
392:
377:Wikieditor06
374:
359:my talk page
355:now archived
352:
339:
310:
302:
275:Brad Beattie
264:
241:Brad Beattie
237:
223:
209:
185:
182:Re: Thankyou
156:
138:village pump
127:
83:
77:
65:
63:
24:
1143:—Preceding
985:GreenReaper
972:let us know
650:Luna Santin
40:Replied at
1398:Cavalryman
1260:topic bans
758:Talk pages
607:No Problem
532:it for you
528:WT:MILHIST
509:good title
405:Rob Wilson
387:Grey Album
134:help pages
130:Wikipedian
85:{{helpme}}
1394:consensus
1316:has been
1256:site bans
952:Anthrocon
810:Deleted.
766:Dr. Qwert
726:Usernames
640:db-reason
513:like this
363:Sebastian
346:Sebastian
336:Mediation
288:Done. :3
212:Lucky 6.9
152:DM Ashura
19:DM Ashura
1157:contribs
1145:unsigned
1115:Kubigula
1055:contribs
1043:unsigned
889:fair use
863:contribs
851:unsigned
804:Sky2.com
776:contribs
716:Ward3001
588:TomasBat
459:contribs
451:Gmailjon
447:unsigned
436:Gmailjon
426:contribs
414:unsigned
396:SkierRMH
290:Pumeleon
257:Pumeleon
66:Pumeleon
32:Pumeleon
1187:nothing
812:Natalie
793:Natalie
780:Natalie
746:ЯΞVΞЯSΞ
740:RΞDVΞRS
696:VerveKS
573:Pedia-I
503:history
481:Mergeto
371:Reverts
322:Renesis
197:rtinp23
70:welcome
64:Hello,
60:Welcome
1363:or on
1329:WP:GNG
1327:Fails
1246:. The
1022:Jon513
682:cheese
521:moveto
318:WP:AIV
279:(talk)
245:(talk)
142:Geniac
68:, and
46:bainer
916:-talk
828:: -->
685:whine
678:Chris
615:CoYep
500:links
1402:talk
1333:this
1280:talk
1221:talk
1200:talk
1177:talk
1153:talk
1120:talk
1094:talk
1077:talk
1051:talk
1017:bite
958:and
905:GFDL
859:talk
770:talk
656:talk
633:that
594:Talk
497:talk
494:edit
485:and
455:talk
422:talk
385:The
326:talk
50:talk
44:. --
1294:of
1240:Hi,
962:to
903:or
873:TA
846:TA
542:nkB
537:Fra
389:guy
162:Hús
1404:)
1367:.
1350:.
1282:)
1258:,
1223:)
1202:)
1179:)
1159:)
1155:•
1096:)
1079:)
1053:•
954:,
948:.
861:•
743:✖
643:}}
637:{{
586:--
519:{{
515:.
483:}}
479:{{
461:)
457:•
428:).
424:•
328:)
239:--
172:nd
52:)
1400:(
1339:.
1278:(
1219:(
1198:(
1175:(
1151:(
1122:)
1118:(
1092:(
1075:(
1049:(
982:.
857:(
773:·
768:(
658:)
654:(
597:)
591:(
581:)
577:(
505:)
492:(
465:.
453:(
420:(
324:(
193:a
189:M
167:ö
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.