333:(thanks) - but now it's back! There's an inappropriate fair use rationale listed on Knowledge (XXG) (it's not a book cover, and there's no commentary on it in the article it's used in) but the image itself is listed on Commons as GFDL... I've tagged it for deletion there also. Is there an appropriate process for persistent uploaders of copyright material? At the very least, the uploader could do with having a good read of copyright policies here and on Commons, but with the multiple warning messages that have been sent already, it's not as if nobody's pointed the user in the right direction already... regards,
572:
459:
176:"Any use or reproduction of material deposited with the Florida Photographic Collection shall be allowed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)(b) and subsection (4), provided that appropriate credit for its use is given." Please contact the Archives if you have any questions regarding the credit and use of any material.
473:
from
Knowledge (XXG). This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under
380:
Back in early
November, you left me a message about contradictory image tags on this image. One was an attribution and one was a fair use. I have now found a message on the developers website simply saying the software is freeware. If that isn't enough then perhaps the fair use rationale should stay.
80:
I would GREATLY APPRECIATE if you were to do whatever is appropriate with these images. As you can tell from my tone, I am frustrated. I left a message on the talk page of the second admin to delete the template. I used a stronger tone than here, and I expressed that I was frustrated. It's bad enough
42:
My main aim is not to get involved in protracted debates or to philosophize about the future nature or essential purpose of
Knowledge (XXG). I will not be found hanging out on controversial AFDs, or involved in lengthy point-by-point rebuttals of other people's views. And unfortunately I may not have
257:
I am no expert when it comes to images and copyright issues on wiki. Unfortunately I do not have much of my naval books to hand so I couldn't tell your where it might be sourced. The two images on the HMS Hood page I claimed as free-fair use images. I simply noted the source and hoped for the best.
175:
Use: The use of photographs and other materials in the custody of the State
Archives of Florida is governed by state law and, in some cases, by the terms of the donation agreement under which the Archives acquired the images. In accordance with the provisions of Section 257.35(6), Florida Statutes,
204:
Thanks for the reply. I seem to have solved the problem by identifying photos that are PD. Fair Use - there is no possible way of finding a duplicate since they are one of a kind. Also I've included publish dates and author if "the collection" has that information. If they do not, I stipulate so.
19:
I have noticed that content creation, while a worthy activity, involves significant investment of time and labor, and can require excellent conflict management skills. Moreover, there is a lot of high quality content creation already underway (and increasingly organized and co-ordinated by
235:"In September 1952, the 65th Infantry was holding on to a hill known as "Outpost Kelly" until the Chinese People's Volunteer Army (Chinese officials maintained from the first that the Chinese fighting in Korea were volunteers) which had joined the North Koreans, overran the position."
302:}}, which advises them that they can be blocked for continuing) yet continue to vandalize even after the final warning. Users can also be reported for other extreme edits, such as spamming several articles a minute or extremely racist or otherwise attack-oriented vandalism.
343:
I deleted it again; there was no image, just text. If s/he tries again we can deal with the fair use rationale stuff. I don't see how it could be fair use though, in any case. About warnings/process: if the user continues to upload, s/he can eventually be blocked for
431:
note you left me on my talk page; I was having a busy few weeks at the time and got round to fixing the error you spoke of but forgot about getting back to you. Sorry about that! Anyway yes, it was a c&p error; thanks for bringing it to my attention. :) Regards,
515:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under
Knowledge (XXG) guidelines.
598:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
215:
It's the photos that are say from the late 1920s through 1950s-early 1960s which are one of a kind. People are dead, property/buildings torn down or renovated, etc. It's based really on uniqueness of subject and if that subject can be retrieved with a camera.
408:. The result of the deletion discussion was to keep the template, but there are still some questions about whether the current template serves a useful purpose and how to prevent its misapplication. Please contribute to the discussion if you are interested. —
43:
as much time as I would like to perform essential first aid on salvageable articles. But by calling to wider attention issues that are more straightforward for the community to resolve I believe I will be making a worthwhile contribution to
Knowledge (XXG).
61:. I have asked an admin numerous times to deal with the problem after I received the first message from another user. They apparently did not have enough time to deal with the problem. I volunteered to help if that's what it takes to resolve the problem.
305:
That said, it's certainly better to call it to somebody's attention than let it go unnoticed. As I said, I'll warn the user--and his talk page will wind up on my watch list, so I'll see if he gets any future warnings.
231:
Hey
Purgatorio, that is an interesting user name. Don't tell me that you are always in a "Limbo" (smi;e). All joking aside, your recommendation is a valid one and what I did was rewrite the whole sentence like this:
38:
I have noticed that it deals less well in processing through the many articles, categories and images in
Wikipedian "Purgatory" that may require action to be taken but have slipped through the "recent changes" net.
602:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
287:}}, a good-faith "Hi, your edit worked, but in future, contribute under the guidelines" message. (When applying such a warning to a user's talk page, make sure to substitute the template, e.g.
23:
I have also noticed that the
Knowledge (XXG) community generally deals well (openly, efficiently, and with a sensible outcome) with certain classes of problem, once notified - for instance,
58:
428:
584:
57:
Please do not send me any more messages about deletion of these articles. Consider myself warned. I commented to that effect in the template's deletion
258:
The last picture of Hood was later modified by user: Dennis, to show that they were taken over 50 years, and as a result are now in the Public domain.
470:
595:
347:
Where is it on
Commons? If it hasn't been deleted already, let me know. I'm an admin there also. (I'm not very active, but I have the tools.) --
81:
to feel the loss of dozens of hard to find good images (even if justified), but it's painful to get messages over and over about it. Cheers!
405:
520:
179:
Florida Department of State State Library and Archives of Florida 500 S. Bronough St. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 (850) 245-6700
483:
151:. As you probably know, the Florida Memory Project template was discarded leaving many images either deleted or with notices.
401:
148:
441:
588:
363:
248:
261:
I suspect as this image, that has no doubt been taken more than 50 years ago, will fall under that blanket also.
478:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
330:
323:
479:
299:
489:
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding
279:
that can be applied. Actually, I'm about to apply the following messages to Ian Garrigan's account: {{
131:
608:
183:
507:
386:
144:
536:
275:
Greetings! First, any user can warn a user who is vandalizing. There are a number of templates at
276:
147:
about rationale even though the below tag is placed on the image and discussion pages. Example:
172:. This image is needed to enhance and improve this article and no other representation exists.
20:
WikiProjects), so what little contributions I will have time for would be a drop in the ocean.
549:
466:
452:
284:
239:
532:
528:
437:
313:
280:
126:
579:
563:
524:
475:
295:
32:
24:
604:
494:
413:
334:
100:
82:
62:
44:
28:
400:
Hello, Purgatorio. Since you recently contributed to the lively deletion discussion for
404:, I thought I'd let you know that I've continued the discussion about this template at
382:
348:
217:
206:
191:
165:
519:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
535:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
367:
283:}}, to give general information about how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG), and {{
433:
308:
262:
458:
99:
Let me know if you want me to mark images that I uploaded for speedy deletion.
409:
482:. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the
505:
the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
612:
556:
445:
417:
390:
370:
351:
337:
317:
265:
242:
220:
209:
194:
112:
94:
74:
47:
117:
Would you help me with fair use criteria for the following photographs:
59:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_6#Template:Flphoto
406:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Non-free content#Template:Non-free promotional
168:, Florida Department of State. It holds the archives' number of:
238:
It was great that you pointed it out, you're doing a great job.
511:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
480:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
457:
205:
It's the bot that attacks with no way to look at rationale.
583:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
577:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
298:
is for users who have received a final warning (like {{
427:
I just realised I forgot to get back to you about the
190:What can be done? Need help from an administator.
429:Bermudian cricket team in the Netherlands in 2007
364:Knowledge (XXG):Fair_use_review#Image:62_war.jpg
153:
8:
596:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Evene
362:Greetings. I've responded to your query at
585:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
396:Template:Non-free promotional discussion
149:Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg
7:
484:guide to writing your first article
14:
594:The article will be discussed at
249:Image:HMS Hood and HMS Barham.JPG
570:
227:Puerto Ricans Missing in Action
200:Florida Photographic Collection
143:I'm still getting notices from
53:Florida Photographic Collection
243:18:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
221:15:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
210:14:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
48:13:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
29:suspected copyright violations
1:
613:19:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
402:Template:Non-free promotional
371:01:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
318:01:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
557:22:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
476:criteria for speedy deletion
418:17:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
352:00:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
338:19:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
266:17:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
501:to the top of the article (
391:19:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
628:
465:A tag has been placed on
446:18:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
156:Digital Image Information
587:or whether it should be
195:15:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
160:This is a one of a kind
113:20:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
95:20:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
75:18:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
33:featured article reviews
508:the article's talk page
331:Image:Pooch cthulhu.jpg
324:Image:Pooch cthulhu.jpg
469:requesting that it be
462:
188:
166:Florida Memory Project
461:
184:Copyright Information
25:articles for deletion
162:unique digital image
329:I know you deleted
294:As a general rule,
145:User:BetacommandBot
463:
366:. All the best, –
158:
17:I am here because:
555:
289:{{subst:welcome}}
154:
132:Image:C015986.jpg
127:Image:C022795.jpg
619:
574:
573:
552:
547:
545:
542:
539:
500:
499:
493:
471:speedily deleted
376:Image:CPView.JPG
290:
271:On warning users
134:(more to follow)
110:
105:
92:
87:
72:
67:
627:
626:
622:
621:
620:
618:
617:
616:
575:
571:
568:
550:
543:
540:
537:
521:for biographies
497:
491:
490:
456:
425:
398:
378:
360:
327:
288:
273:
252:
240:Tony the Marine
229:
202:
141:
106:
101:
88:
83:
68:
63:
55:
12:
11:
5:
625:
623:
569:
567:
562:Nomination of
560:
455:
451:Notability of
449:
424:
421:
397:
394:
377:
374:
359:
356:
355:
354:
345:
326:
321:
272:
269:
251:
246:
228:
225:
224:
223:
201:
198:
187:
186:
140:
137:
136:
135:
129:
123:
122:
121:
120:
119:
118:
54:
51:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
624:
615:
614:
610:
606:
600:
597:
592:
590:
586:
582:
581:
565:
561:
559:
558:
553:
546:
534:
533:for companies
530:
526:
525:for web sites
522:
517:
514:
510:
509:
504:
496:
487:
485:
481:
477:
472:
468:
460:
454:
450:
448:
447:
443:
439:
435:
430:
422:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
395:
393:
392:
388:
384:
375:
373:
372:
369:
365:
357:
353:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
325:
322:
320:
319:
315:
311:
310:
303:
301:
300:uw-vandalism4
297:
292:
286:
282:
278:
270:
268:
267:
264:
259:
255:
250:
247:
245:
244:
241:
236:
233:
226:
222:
219:
214:
213:
212:
211:
208:
199:
197:
196:
193:
185:
182:
181:
180:
177:
173:
171:
167:
163:
157:
152:
150:
146:
139:Assist needed
138:
133:
130:
128:
125:
124:
116:
115:
114:
111:
109:
104:
98:
97:
96:
93:
91:
86:
79:
78:
77:
76:
73:
71:
66:
60:
52:
50:
49:
46:
40:
36:
34:
30:
26:
21:
18:
601:
593:
578:
576:
566:for deletion
518:
512:
506:
502:
488:
464:
426:
399:
379:
361:
328:
307:
304:
293:
274:
260:
256:
253:
237:
234:
230:
203:
189:
178:
174:
169:
161:
159:
155:
142:
107:
102:
89:
84:
69:
64:
56:
41:
37:
22:
16:
15:
344:disruption.
605:Rathfelder
503:just below
335:Purgatorio
45:Purgatorio
529:for bands
349:Fang Aili
218:Noles1984
207:Noles1984
192:Noles1984
164:from The
467:Evene.fr
453:Evene.fr
442:contribs
383:crandles
285:uw-test1
277:WP:TUSER
589:deleted
368:Quadell
281:welcome
170:0000000
513:speedy
495:hangon
434:AllynJ
423:Sorry!
358:62 War
309:C.Fred
296:WP:AIV
263:Dapi89
580:Evene
564:Evene
538:Schuy
531:, or
410:Bkell
108:broil
103:Royal
90:broil
85:Royal
70:broil
65:Royal
609:talk
551:talk
474:the
438:talk
414:talk
387:talk
314:talk
254:Hi.
31:or
611:)
591:.
527:,
523:,
498:}}
492:{{
486:.
444:)
440:|
416:)
389:)
316:)
291:.
35:.
27:,
607:(
554:)
548:(
544:1
541:m
436:(
412:(
385:(
312:(
306:—
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.