User talk:Purplewowies/Archive 2

1344:

stated that the source is reliable. Knowledge states that newspapers are not reliable sources. The Times is part of News International which is subject to criminal investigations both in the UK and the USA. To check the source one has to pay for the subscription. I asked the contributor to use a different source. This is fairly easy to do. You can get the same story from the Guardian or even the Telegraph. I also pointed out to him that the school is, according to the UK government, fully compliant with regards to children's safety. He has refused to acknowledge this even though the source according to wiki rules is much better than a newspaper.

756:

out of it and had started succumbing to brain fog. I had completely forgotten to check redirects at that point, even with the merge instructions in front of me telling me to do so. Then, when the character redirects I had done as part of the merge were reverted back into being character articles, I thought it would be best for the list articles to be deleted (though I probably could have waited to do something like that when my thoughts were more coherent). Again, partially because I was extremely tired, I totally forgot to check redirects at a time when I normally would have. I am

631:

duplicated at each of the new articles. Only content relevant to the specific series should be in each article. Content that is common to both series needs to be in each article, but that inevitably results in duplication errors and a loss of the character's full history in each article. Then there is the issue of redirection of the original articles. Redirecting them to one or other of the series is inappropriate because it makes it difficult for readers to find the Mr Moseby of TSLOD if his article is redirected to the TSLOZAC article. At some point in the past, somebody created

2287: 664:). I'm an inclusionist at heart and would do anything possible to keep things from being merged/deleted, which was why I did a huge chunk of work on Cody's article until I hit a wall (not that he was in really super danger of being merged or deleted). I really think that these specific articles would be much better separate, especially if their problems can be dealt with. (I was going to say something else here but my brain is almost sleepwalking at this point... Hopefully, you understand what I'm saying.) - 2817: 2604: 2425: 1412: 1257: 1116: 1054: 491: 3518: 31: 1738: 3295: 1503: 416:, where you can say essentially "Please delete this page; I'm the only contributor, but for some reason I can't mark it for deletion". Pages for which you're the only editor generally qualify for speedy deletion under criterion G7: "Author requests deletion. If requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author." 2564: 828: 936:! :) You don't need to increment the warnings by one each time, and the only reason bots and automated scripts do it is because they don't have human judgement, and so can't decide which warning is most appropriate. For obvious bad-faith vandalism, it's quite acceptable to start at level two or three, or to skip a few levels, as long as they get a final warning before they're reported to 995:

again. I was attempting to cite a statement here, and I was "in the zone" and searching really quickly and repetitively, so maybe that set it off? (Come to think of it, I think the message I got told me very specifically what I was doing and then apologized in case I was a human, but I don't quite remember because it was awhile ago. :P Also, I know nothing about bots.) -

2096: 3245: 2187: 80: 2447: 1690:: The checkuser who originally imposed the block has determined it's no longer necessary. It was never intended to affect you and you've done nothing wrong, sorry for the trouble! Since the block is lifted, you would no longer need ipblock-exempt, but if this becomes a recurrent issue we could look into setting it for you. 3198:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

2722:

I don't disagree with you about the lack of real-world content. I'm of the opinion now that it might be best to merge all of the articles into "List of The Suite Life series main characters" with redirects from "List of the Suite Life of Zack & Cody main characters" and "List of the Suite Life on

2703:

Okay, fair enough. I sat for several minutes myself debating whether it should have been nommed and went ahead with it because it seemed to be identical to what I remembered. (I'm still of the opinion that these articles would all be better with more real-world coverage I unfortunately don't have the

323:

Actually, an admin switched an image I had added to a right alignment and said that was the reason, and I assumed he was right. I have a screen reading browser that I use to check for accessibility issues here sometimes. I checked the page before and after the edit, and it read it confusingly before,

2946:

I must admit I don't know enough about the accessibility issue to be able to find good info outside the documentation right now, though the doc doesn't make it clear that it isn't also talking about lists, not to mention that Mediawiki renders their list-item-level html exactly the same (in terms of

1662:

My account appears to be blocked due to the IP I'm using (I figured this out while attempting to make an edit to an article). The IP was blocked after CheckUser determined that the IP was being used disruptively. Can I be unblocked? Also, since my account is in good standing, can I request IP block

994:

I don't know. :-? I think I was repeatedly searching the site, and it told me I was searching too much like a bot does or something. I believe I was quickly searching for things on the site, clicking into a page, realizing it wasn't what I needed, then searching a similar term and doing the process

792:

The only other one I could think of was Carey Marie Martin, which I have restored. I can't think of any other names (other than the ones you've mentioned) that are even close to significant enough that someone would've/should've made a redirect. (And in the case of Maddie, if someone were to search

891:

You need to be confirmed or autoconfirmed. You will become autoconfirmed on 10 Febrary 2012 at 00:36 UTC (about two more days). To be confirmed, you have to request it, which I see you did a couple of days ago. Your request was denied, and they said you should probably get more experience here, so

755:

Yeah... I normally check those types of things. Disregarding the fact that a merge like that probably needed more consensus, I made the mistake of starting it pretty late in the day. It took a long time to do, and it was mentally tiring, so by the end of the initial merging, I was already a little

682:

and then, when that was deleted, marked by another bot for speedy deletion as dead redirects. For future reference, when doing these sort of moves and rearrangements, you need to click "what links here" so that you know what redirects may be affected. Now that I see what has been going on, I have

630:

I appreciate the effort that you've gone to copying the character content into the two articles that you've created, but it's problematic. The main issue is with the main characters, Zack, Cody, London and Mr Moseby, who appeared in both series. The content from their articles shouldn't simply be

1343:

Than you for your message. I will continue to hold that the fact that one has to pay for a product makes it difficult to check sources. Knowledge is free. The sources ought to be free also. I suspect the comments about Downside have been lifted and are subject to copyright. The contributor also

640:

as justification. This would result in one, nice and neat article without any images of the characters at all. Ultimately it seemed best to leave the individual articles. That said, there is a definite need to prune much of the content in the individual articles, and that should really be done

1347:

I asked also that his piece should be shortened and it's place belongs towards the end of the wiki entry. Knowledge is an encyclopaedia not a place of accusation or innuendo. That spirit has been lost in this case. As is the entry is by far the largest about the community, and actually shows

960:

I know. :-p I just typically don't skip warning levels myself, and I felt the need to explain my reasoning in the edit summary. On another note, I apparently behave like a bot a lot, since some other sites that have anti-bot technology stop me sometimes for bot-like browsing activity. :) -

1924:

A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at

2856:

I am sorry about calling you a boy, I didn't want to mix it up but when I read your user name I must have missed it but I couldn't find any notification that you where a boy :s deepest apologies I shouldn't have drawn to the conclusion that you are a boy, won't happen again.

2777:

Hi Purplewowies, thank you for your contribution to the RfC on Justin Bieber's behaviour and legal issues. Some users have posted that the RfC is currently a mess, and that we need to be very explicit in what we agree to include and what we don't. As such, I have created a

2675:

is essentially a rewrite of Cody Martin, which seems reasonable given that they're twins with almost identical storylines. My reaction when I first saw the article earlier was the same as yours, I almost speedied it myself, but I think this would have to go to a new AfD.

1438: 777:

but, as I said above, other incoming redirects from individual character names may have been deleted by people who did not realise what was going on, so you might like to check any other alternate versions of names that might have been redirects. Regards,

2782:

cuts the content into points. Could you take the time to post your opinion on each point, whether you think it should be included or not, or summarized, or changed. It will be a bit tedious but we need your detailed input to move forward. Thanks again.

1974:

I support your revert of the content that does not really belong in this article. You should have left a note in the edit summary, though, as uncommented reverts are pretty much synonymous with a vandalism revert and the edit did appear good faith.

159:, the IP you reverted is a persistent vandal, creating gratuitous wikilinks and changing content. You'll often see it changing female names to "Chanel". Unfortunately it has a dynamic address so the IP changes, but it's always from 108.17.x.x -- 2047:. I don't think you will find any admin that thinks unprotecting an article that has needed to be protected so many times is a good idea. Most of the Disney/Nickeleodeon stars' articles are under near constant semiprotection due to vandalism.— 2961:

The access issue I assume is with auto-dictating the paras inside the footnotes. Indeed, the mediawiki markup is the same, but that's not relevant here. If I'd noticed that note, I wouldn't have made the change. Thank you for reverting it.

1990:

Yeah. I left a comment (and typically leave comments), but my wifi did a weird thing, and Knowledge was having problems at the time, so I had to do it again and I didn't leave a summary. What's weird is usually it warns me about that... -

892:

they would probably deny it if you asked again. Your two best options are to either wait until you're autoconfirmed two days from now and make the edit yourself, or request an edit on the article's talk page following the instructions

2337:, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of 2502:

Thank You, I am sure that I will contribute funds to your Epic Free Encyclopaedia I gained immense knowledge from your website, Thanks to everyone single person on your staff for their excellent work on bringing up this website.

1712:

is scheduled to be closed on 2 June 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding

1300:

Do not touch the downside page. That is good advice. As is the page gives a very good reflection of the values and the history. Do more then I will mention your name in areas where your name should not be mentioned.

635:

and I had considered placing all of the characters in one article, but this results in other issues, namely that there is a group who delight in deleting multiple fair-use images in list articles, improperly citing

2917:

tags can cause problems for navigation with screen readers, which expect these tags to delimit paragraphs of prose." I suppose the doc could be wrong, but it didn't seem that way from how I know the tag to work. -

1663:

exemption? (I've never done this before, and I don't know if it's an appropriate thing to ask in this case, but I figured it couldn't hurt to ask.) - Purplewowies (talk) (How's my driving?) 18:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

3431:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2234:

this is new for me just a month old. difficult how you get attacked trying to comment anywhere, people attack you not because they have issues with what you wrote, but because you are new so you have to fake.

449: 445: 1456:

intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse

308:

and, although right aligned images are most common, I found a lot of articles with left aligned images directly after headers so this does not appear to be an issue for featured article promotion. --

2163:

in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks,

287:

I have seen lots of left aligned images as the first thing in a section in a lot of articles so I am curious where the issue of "Left-aligned images directly after headers can cause problems with

2704:

time to add, but that's an issue less-related to this particular thing.) But again, I didn't realize the article was not sufficiently identical to the one that had been deleted... so yeah.

2667:

articles were different, with "Zack Martin" essentially being unreferenced while "Cody Martin" was referenced. I assume this is why "Cody Martin" wasn't re-nominated when "Zack Martin" and

657: 1022: 372:, so I assume it would be OK to use and bold both. If for some reason no reliable sources ever refer to them as the Sprouse Brothers (which seems unlikely), then I would not bold it. 2404: 2391: 2273: 2342: 741:

before they got deleted. There are no more live redirects still pointing to the "List" article, but others may have been deleted by people who didn't realise what was going on.

2627:

Note: Im not an employee of the Company. I wanted to put information of Company based there as its a public limited company and they are into manufacturing of auto components.

584: 2723:

Deck main characters". That way we can at least keep the content we have without much risk that the existing articles will be deleted. When that happens we lose everything. --

1892:

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Knowledge email!

3355: 186: 2077:- basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :). 656:

Well... I only even considered merging because it was the second time in a relatively short span that a merge was suggested for most/all of the character articles (first at

324:

so I changed it. However, it also read confusingly after, so I have no idea. I might've been (read: was probably, like I am usually about tech-ish stuff like that) wrong. -

2830: 2617: 2438: 1425: 1270: 1129: 1067: 508: 255:

has been rather inactive recently. I saw that you are a member of the project. If you still consider yourself to be an active member, leave a response on the Project's

2073:. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of 1384: 291:

and break the flow of text" is discussed and if there are other workarounds other than a paragraph of text before the image. Looks like a bug in the wiki software.

712: 708: 437: 1094:

PS: If you reply to me at the help desk, please drop me a reminder onto my talkpage, as otherwise I might forget to check back for your reply there. Thanks. --

632: 2624:

Thanks, so I need to create articles in creation before i publish it? Also please advise if I need to review with administrators before I Publish it? Thanks.

1603: 204: 2471:

by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!

2110: 1122: 1115: 3485: 1547: 1256: 459: 2932:

Oh, I see. But a p tag would've been right to use inside a list; the accessibility issue (if there's indeed one) is with using it inside footnotes.

1477:

The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

678:

Redirects to these characters: as a result of your operations, several redirects were first switched by one bot, as double redirects, to point to

1902:

Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).

1348:

considerable ignorance about the importance of the community. The monks do not go onto the Internet and so are an easy target and defenceless.

1175: 1151: 1105: 1085: 704: 679: 2659:

because it's not the same article that was deleted, so speedy doesn't apply. One of the things that I noted at the original AfDs was that the

3481: 1597: 455: 3456: 3372: 2798: 2522: 1709: 1214: 684: 3311:

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

975:

Fair enough. How on Earth can you browse like a bot? If ClueBot could read, I'd be able to write an article instead of block vandals! ;)

2345:. There's lots of news this month for the Knowledge Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... 2070: 2963: 2933: 2899: 2303: 2199: 1542: 1367: 1327: 412:

If you ever have trouble (for whatever reason) with getting a page deleted that you and you only have created, you can always go to

256: 3546: 3129: 2251: 119: 59: 2947:

used tags), so theoretically, they'd both hit access issues. At any rate, I still feel the change should have been discussed. -

3452: 3368: 3364: 3294: 3014: 1263: 554: 526: 452:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3478:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2202:

whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

1810:- "Pur mantenendo le caratteristiche di Ospedale privato ad indirizzo esclusivamente chirurgico, nel 1995 la conosciutissima 1621: 2140:. I want to ask you if wiki projects created withour a proposal are eligible for deletion. What do you recommend me to do? 2145: 1933: 1639: 1396: 1233: 3188: 3147: 2317: 1458: 252: 3443:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3448: 1926: 305: 1905:

Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Knowledge will see it).

3525: 1561: 1193: 1171: 1147: 1101: 1081: 608:

I saw an IP blanking a User's page and reverted it. Seems to be a common vandalism. Sorry for the inconvenience!

38: 3279: 3253: 3029: 2582: 1591: 1462: 3059: 3222: 3134: 2890: 2794: 2672: 2656: 2518: 2141: 1225: 1224:, thanks for visiting the Teahouse! As an experienced editor, your knowledge is very valuable to new editors. 93: 3470:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3142: 3069: 2286: 2024: 1980: 1030: 347: 339: 313: 296: 602: 3534: 3471: 2967: 2952: 2937: 2923: 2903: 2862: 2757: 2735: 2713: 2688: 2297: 2168: 2122: 2105:

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an

2010: 1996: 1586: 1240: 1189: 1000: 966: 901: 798: 765: 669: 646: 573: 329: 234: 212: 194: 175: 164: 105: 47: 17: 2514: 2375:

Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

127:

It really needs to be a subsection of the main article -- the foundation itself isn't notable apart from

3268: 2640: 2610: 2603: 2082: 1874: 1787: 1490: 1363: 1323: 1308:

The abuse story is ok to wiki but should have its place a little lower down and without so many words.

1165: 1141: 1095: 1075: 984: 949: 592: 3170: 2913: 2221: 1359: 1319: 1232:

and beyond. If you'd like to get involved in assisting new editors at the Teahouse, please learn more

3275: 3249: 3230: 3207: 3152: 2762: 2510: 2363:

Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

2247: 2239: 1957: 1856: 1768:

s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

1437: 1355: 1315: 688: 136: 114: 109: 2484: 2456: 1758:

and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more

3444: 3160: 2882: 2842: 2785: 2572:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2542:'s programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this 2488: 2460: 2431: 2424: 2369:

OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

2137: 1834: 1828:, con indirizzo squisitamente oculistico, in quanto l'ospedale di Arezzo era privo di tale reparto" 1721: 1673: 1510: 1282: 1060: 1053: 1038: 661: 550: 540: 522: 497: 490: 377: 261: 2019:

I hate that when stuff like that happens. I've had problems like that too when wiki is acting up.

2005:

Actually, I just went to the tab I did the edit in, and a big Wikimedia Error screen greets me. -

3257: 2823: 2816: 2779: 2468: 2464: 2357:

Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

2218: 2195: 2194:

Hello Purplewowies, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote

2020: 1976: 1968: 1755: 1691: 1615: 1446: 1229: 1213: 1016: 915: 881: 860: 838: 696: 692: 343: 309: 292: 855:

This is just to thank you for your kind help with my proposal to delete an article. Thank you!

3501: 3420: 3411: 3215: 2948: 2919: 2858: 2724: 2709: 2677: 2408: 2293: 2164: 2118: 2006: 1992: 1942: 1885: 1521: 1418: 1411: 1392: 1236: 996: 962: 897: 893: 794: 761: 665: 642: 637: 613: 569: 475: 421: 325: 230: 208: 190: 160: 101: 100:

for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative

97: 2543: 1908:

You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

1470: 1453: 3440: 3424: 3401: 3389: 3165: 2636: 2498:

Re: How do I read an article (of the same content) in Hindi which I have Spotted in English?

2311: 1870: 1783: 1538: 976: 941: 783: 746: 720: 715:- restore them if you like, but I did not because they seem to me absurd overkill. Regards, 588: 244: 3439:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3382: 3226: 3024: 3009: 2988: 2381:

WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

2243: 2106: 1953: 1851: 1772: 1762: 1748: 1737: 402: 132: 2387:

Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

1627: 1305:

I assume you do not have children, but you probably have parents and maybe a girlfriend.

658:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Fictional characters/Archive 3#Can this article be reassessed?

3505: 3460: 3405: 3376: 3283: 3234: 2971: 2956: 2941: 2927: 2907: 2884: 2866: 2846: 2802: 2766: 2741: 2717: 2694: 2644: 2552: 2526: 2492: 2411: 2255: 2172: 2149: 2126: 2056: 2028: 2014: 2000: 1984: 1961: 1938:

Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage

1878: 1791: 1726: 1696: 1400: 1383:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

1371: 1331: 1311:

If you want a fight you will lose. I can only hope you wish not to go down this route.

1286: 1244: 1207: 1179: 1155: 1109: 1089: 1042: 1004: 989: 970: 954: 919: 905: 885: 864: 842: 802: 787: 769: 750: 724: 673: 650: 617: 596: 577: 558: 530: 504: 479: 425: 406: 387: 351: 333: 317: 300: 274: 238: 216: 198: 168: 140: 121: 3436: 3428: 3106: 3089: 3074: 3049: 3019: 2877: 2838: 2668: 2476: 2160: 2069:

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the

1776: 1718: 1668: 1278: 1200: 1034: 543: 515: 373: 182: 2916:: I was referencing the documentation when I asserted that: "However, using <p: --> 1806: 3492:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3432: 3393: 3302: 3124: 3111: 3084: 3079: 3064: 2539: 2327: 2204: 2052: 1483: 937: 911: 877: 856: 834: 730: 700: 466:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

288: 128: 3497: 3493: 3211: 3183: 3116: 3054: 3004: 2592: 1388: 1161: 609: 471: 467: 417: 413: 3396:

I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards,

1824:- "La Casa di Cura "Poggio del Sole" fu costruita nel 1924 grazie all'impegno del 2045:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log&page=Dylan+and+Cole+Sprouse

3533:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3397: 3094: 2664: 2660: 2549: 2307: 2074: 1950: 1137: 827: 779: 742: 716: 156: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2754:

You gave me a warning without saying where I'd allegedly done something wrong.

2087: 3039: 2700:(The following is moved from my talk page to keep the discussion in one place) 2351:

1514: 774: 738: 398: 88: 3178: 3044: 3034: 1820: 568:

Is there a place where I can request an article to be copyedited? Thanks. -

3267: 2403:

only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the

1775:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ 1023:

Knowledge:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 21#Template:More plot

793:

her entire name, 66-100% of the results are related to The Suite Life.) -

342:

so others can participate. If it is an issue, I think it is fairly minor.

3475: 2048: 1949:

Thanks for helping make Knowledge better. Enjoy your research! Cheers,

360:

Re: One of your suggestions in the Peer Review for Dylan and Cole Sprouse

3305:

has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and

3250:

Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding...

2991:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

1387:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

1297:

MI5 are scared of that is why whenever I enter the UK they question me.

79: 1897: 1517:

lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

3244: 587:

and Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/List of participants--

734: 340:

Talk:Jessie (TV series)#Left aligned image in Main characters section

3221:

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on

1920:

along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Knowledge).

2186: 3243: 2446: 2090:. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at 1869:

I created the page BEFORE the 'Wikihelpdesk' gave their advice. --

713:

Madeline "Maddie" Margaret Genevieve Miranda Catherine Fitzpatrick

709:

Madeline Margaret Genevieve Miranda Catherine "Maddie" Fitzpatrick

441: 397:

I just wanted to thank you for the quick response to my question.

259:. Hopefully we can get the project up and running again. Thanks!-- 3427:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2159:

Hey Purplewowies; I'm dropping you this note because you've used

3199:

Your contributions make Knowledge better — thanks for helping.

1704:

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

3330:: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices 2569:

Hello, Purplewowies. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2080:

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want:

1140:

archived the help desk section while I was replying to it.) --

96:

has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the

3512: 1843: 364:

I assume there are reliable sources that refer to them as the

25: 2706:(I forget my original point of posting here... but ah, well.) 3342:: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs 3293: 3276:"Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" 2833: