44:. I have a website of my own dedicated to the understanding and, I hope, development of absolute pitch-- so I've put in a lot of effort to enhance the accuracy and quality of the absolute pitch Knowledge (XXG) article, and I'd love to have a direct link to my home page, but if you read the discussion page for that article you'll see the tussle over promotional links that happened there. I'm pretty sure that Knowledge (XXG) policy is generally meant to keep the door closed to that kind of blatant promotion, and we're tarred with the same brush; but whether or not that's so, my interest in vigilant perpetuation of the discussion is mainly that, since off-line I'm in an academic environment, it helps me stay sharp in recognizing how to distinguish between sources percieved to be "reliable" or "unreliable", which was a big problem for me in the last two terms.
130:, and subject to revision. The 5th graders are now expected to sing OR perform on instruments from sheet music they have written rather than new music, 8th graders are still expected to sing by sight "Students are asked to perform a sight-singing exercise of four measures of music. Students will be assessed on their understanding of rhythm and steady beat and their ability to perform in the designated key with accurate interval changes, acappella."
94:
way back on 12 December 2007. I've recently been checking all the references on the article. I can't find any of the article content on the page your reference links to. I also followed the Zoo Music link on the page the reference links to and couldn't find the referenced content. Has the referenced
59:
Aruffo, thank you for your explanation. I agree that fighting spam, and even more generally, enforcing the guidelines and policies of WP, is essential to its very existence. I can imagine what WP would be like without editors like you constantly fighting spam - it would be unusable and would die. I
95:
site changed, or is there another deeper link that we should use instead? Also, there are no references for some of the material following the note 1 link in the content. If you have a minute, I'd greatly appreciate any guidance you can offer on this to help me clean up the references. Thanks,
69:
Incidentally, I just declared my support for the trainear.com link, but I want you to know it is nothing personal against you. I also agree that the personal attacks against you are inappropriate and unproductive. I personally believe you are working in good faith.
110:
I just caught this. Maybe they removed it because of complaints, but it was their position that this was validated by pilot tests. I hope they cancelled it, WA just voted out its present superintendent for a fellow who doesn't like these assessments
64:. I believe it is necessary for us to be able to use the guidelines based on what they literally say, not what we wish or think they should say. If they aren't right, the proper forum to change them is in their talk pages.
35:
Hallo Qazin, Although it might be careless of me to describe this publicly, it occurred to me that you might appreciate knowing some of my motivation, which is essentially that I have the same relationship to the
60:
also recognize the need for continually improving the guidelines to remove ambiguity so that their implementation can be more consistent. I've been doing a little work to that end on
128:
135:
116:
49:
61:
37:
131:
112:
91:
41:
45:
96:
71:
17:
139:
120:
104:
79:
53:
25:
127:
The site and exercise has been revised it is now at
90:Bachcell, thank you for your contribution to
8:
16:This is the Qazin talk (discussion) page
92:Sight_reading#Assessment_and_standards
7:
14:
1:
80:20:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
54:04:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
105:04:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
140:20:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
121:00:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
156:
75:
26:02:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
21:
86:sight reading standards
40:article as you do to
147:
155:
154:
150:
149:
148:
146:
145:
144:
88:
33:
12:
11:
5:
153:
151:
143:
142:
124:
123:
87:
84:
83:
82:
66:
65:
38:absolute pitch
32:
29:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
152:
141:
137:
133:
129:
126:
125:
122:
118:
114:
109:
108:
107:
106:
102:
98:
93:
85:
81:
77:
73:
68:
67:
63:
58:
57:
56:
55:
51:
47:
43:
42:Sight reading
39:
30:
28:
27:
23:
19:
100:
89:
34:
15:
31:Discussions
132:Bachcell
113:Bachcell
46:aruffo
97:Qazin
72:Qazin
62:WP:EL
18:Qazin
136:talk
117:talk
101:talk
76:talk
50:talk
22:talk
138:)
119:)
103:)
78:)
52:)
24:)
134:(
115:(
99:(
74:(
48:(
20:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.