User talk:R. E. Mixer

1001:, maybe, for Fighter Wings assigned to SAC, 'The United States Air Force assigned a large number of Fighter Wings to Strategic Air Command during several parts of SAC's history. These wings had the roles of X, Y, Z', (whatever the roles were)', people would not tag the articles as needing work. The reason people are tagging the articles as having insufficient context is that the articles you are creating from the SAC Wings page do not stand alone. All wikipedia articles should be able to be read and understood without referring to any other article. So you'd have to explain that the USAF had a command called SAC, and it had a number of fighter wings (link at that point to an article about USAF wings) etc etc. Please understand me here - I am not trying to criticise your efforts, merely trying to help you bring these articles to a standard so they won't be deleted. Regards from Down Under 2358:

around the workload, the agencies would be more amenable to the requests. Most of the lineage and honors histories of active units are listed on the web page, but some (like the 1st Space Wing, 2d Space Wing and 3d Space Support Wing) had to be specifically requested since they are inactive. If the request is small (a unit or two), then they will not charge any fees for processing (I've had 9 requests filled so far and haven't paid a dime). Since you deal in inactive units (in SAC), this might be a great route to get GOOD lineage and honors info straight from the USAF, and not hashed off the 'net like some other USAF unit pages are.

1049:) and how it fits in with the "big picture". The lead-ins give the articles context. The titles do have somewhat of an explanation but for someone who has no idea what SAC is or what a wing is, or what the wings do, the article may be meaningless no matter how much information is in the article. Your articles should be able to stand alone to a degree, but with links that people could take that would give them more information if they were interested. There is a fairly good one-sentence lead-in in the article 1916: 2061: 1752: 1859: 1694: 157: 4568: 4460: 4352: 4244: 4136: 4028: 3910: 3802: 3694: 3576: 3468: 3360: 3252: 3144: 2178: 1993: 1596: 2933: 109:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 809:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2381: 2250: 2476: 1057:. Maybe there should be a separate article on Wings associated with the USAF (not a list, but an explanation about how wings came about and what they do) that could be linked to, if one doesn't exist already (I don't think one does). BTW, since I have an interest in military history, I think that your articles are interesting and have lots of good info. All the best. 3069: 448: 1177: 680:

same thing could be attempted by cutting out a lot of the duplicated information - every ANG wing that got the KC-135 initially, and the repeated notes about the first eleven organisations assigned to SAC, and possibly re-arranging it as text. I'll have a think about how such a text rendition might work and run it by you.

910: 679:

Understand your point about changing -ruining?- the original intent. The thing is that in building such a record of every wing's contribution to SAC, the result is so long as to be unreadable. For what it's worth, the history will be accessible by anyone looking at the inidividual wing histories. The

186:

status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Knowledge (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to

938:

Also, I put all the 1700 series wings under the Provisional Wings page. Thank you for setting up that page, because I've never been clear what those wings were - MAJCOM or AFCON. The only other discussion to them, an article in 'Air International' in the mid 1990s, wasn't clear either. I had no idea

931:

Saw your comment on the AfD above. I well understand that this must be really annoying for you to have the SAC Wings page chopped up, and I can see the issue you're facing. Would doing a 'Specialised wings of SAC', including all the entries with only one wing, like Tac & Training, ARTW, maybe, I

357:

In order for the material to remain on wikipedia, an email should be sent by the holder of the copyright to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org giving permission to use the material on wikipedia, otherwise the material may be deleted. A simple statement of 'I have been given permission' is not enough,

2397:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

2357:

has some lineage and honors histories available; I requested these about a month ago. They are pretty quick about them from AFHRA. Since a lot of USAF wing and squadron pages are lacking decent references, I thought if multiple individuals put in requests to AF Historical Research Agency, to spread

1257:

Concerning the deletion of various wings from the SAC Article. Someone didn't like it when it was altogether and then to appease them them I spit it up by typeas of wing someone didn't like THAT. THERE IS NO PLEASING YOU PICKY PEOPLE SO I'M DONE WITH WICKIPEDIA AND YOU CAN CONTINUWE TO DESTROY AND

591:

I apologize. Your first message was followed almost immediately by a different message, so when I logged on and saw the new message notice, I clicked "last change" and saw the WPMILHIST newsletter instead of your message. Sorry for any inconvenience I might have caused. But good article on the SAC

576:

This would better achieve what I believe is your goal, to educate people about SAC and the role of various other aircraft in SAC's mission. That way, instead of another reader seeing your link and wondering "why the heck is SAC referenced there?", they would be able to read your text and know the

432:

Please stop adding "Internal links" sections to article. 1) This is not a standard section header that is used in wikipedia, if you have a relevant article to reference, use the "See also" section. 2) Most of these aircraft were not operated by the Strategic Air Command, so this addition is not

476:

do your research on just what kind of aircraft SAC did or did not have. I do not know what your credentials are but you are ill informed on the subject of the Strategic Air Command. The last B-29s to leave the inventory left in 1953. The last of the B-17 left the inventory leftr in 1949. The last

986:

Hey thanks for your note Mr Mixer. The nice thing about 'List of USAF Wings' page is that we can expand the average person's knowledge and explain that there were two separate (oops, three?, with Provisional?) types of wings. With your notes about the Guam rotations, did you mean that every wing

477:

F-51 left the inventory in 1948. the last F-82s left th inventory in 1951. the last F-84s left the inventory in 1956, the last F-86s left the inventory in 1959. There were RC-45s assigned as late as 1947. The last C-124s left the inventory in 1959. I could go on but do not wish to bore you with

1226: 462:

to topics that have no direct relationship to SAC. The only aircraft that were operated by SAC were bombers and tankers. Additionally, most WWII bombers were dropped from the inventory before the establishment of SAC in 1946. Please do some research before adding this incorrect content to

2077:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually

1768:

1040:

Whoa, wait a minute, I'm just trying to help your articles. The tags don't say your articles lacked sufficient information in the title; the tags mean the articles lack information that would give them context. Articles, including lists, should have a lead-in, or explanation about what the

1478: 1429: 1380: 1331: 1282: 2222:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines.

2037:

1128: 1633:

on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

608:

Hi Ron. I've been looking at your impressive SAC wings page, with its list of every affiliated wing ever involved with SAC. However it is a bit long and hard to read, and when I opened the edit view, it said it was over 200kb, far exceeding the recommendations at

2502: 231:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 282:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 2989:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

3026:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

996:

Hi Mr Mixer thanks again for your note on Andersen operations. I saw that you'd already added the 4133 Strategic Wing to the list. I think if you added one or two sentences of explanation, maybe something like what I've put at

1319: 1312: 871:

Hope you had a good holiday... greetings from Down Under. Were you aware when you created list pages for the Tac & Training Wing and Strat Weapons Wing recently that there is already an article on the 99th Wing... under

346:

I have added a copyright notice to the article. Please clarify who gave permission, what is copyrighted, where you obtained it, and what level of release you received. We cannot use copyrighted content on Knowledge. thanks!

1417: 1410: 517:

by Norman Pulmar and Timothy Laur. The first paragraph in the SAC article says the command had fighter until late in the '50s. I have authored three SAC books and have done the homework. Nice having chatted with you.

2893:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1050: 1270: 1263: 689:

If you want to set up extra pages focusing on Bomb Wings of SAC or Recce Wings of SAC etc you should note that in the page title - otherwise people may think these are the only U.S. wings of this type.

727:

to Knowledge articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior.

1030:

Please stop the tagging of these lists as not having sufficient information the wings came from the SAC article and I can't see how the list does not have enough information in the title. POlease stop

1649:

on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

1116: 1109: 792:

and click on the Four Digit Wings category at the bottom. Those wings have always had a special meaning to me, so I created a category. Feel free to add some SWs, SAWS, and anything else that fits.

227:

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2192:, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Knowledge (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. 2007:, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Knowledge (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. 769:

Page's intent is good, but execution needs refining. Would recommend just listing wings then linking to wing pages; if wing pages don't exist, create using a standardized template. Example on

1473:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1424:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1375:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1326:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1277:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1221:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1172:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1123:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1071: 1015: 977:'? Also, were the wings officially called '806th Bomb Wing (P) Provisional', or just '806th Bomb Wing (Provisional)'? Thankyou for answering my questions on this. Cheers from Down Under, 2490:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1477:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1428:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1379:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1330:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1281:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1225:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1176:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1127:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1098:

article. I think you would probably be the best person to write a section on MAJCOM wings, explaining why and how they were formed, and when and why the USAF stopped using them. Cheers

2501:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

773:. Need more wings not listed; strategic wings, strategic aerospace wings all above the 3-digit wings listed. Might consider changing page to a Category page like listed on bottom of 1022:

says below, it would be good if you added some lines of explanation to the top of the individual lists of wings. Then they would be in context, and probably wouldn't be deleted.

1572: 1546: 1520: 901:

process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see

1094:- you commented on my talk page on that section. There is also a category, Four Digit Wings of the USAF, which can be accessed through the category link at the bottom of the 1165: 1158: 1083:

say, it would be good if you added some lines of explanation to the top of the individual lists of wings. Then they would be in context, and probably wouldn't be deleted.

2293:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click

2118:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

1942:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

1809:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2401:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2081:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1772:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1466: 1459: 909:). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing 3089:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

970: 2945:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. 286:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 3084: 2558: 966: 2283:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 914: 894: 887: 2553:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

962: 751:

Please do not blank or remove large amounts of content from pages. It is considered vandalism. If you wish for a page to be deleted, then please follow the

536:

sections of various articles about MAC, MATS and TAC aircraft, why not do something in the text of the article like this example of what you might add to the

1214: 1207: 1087: 394: 4500: 2957: 917:

during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate.

3016: 2325: 2853: 2820: 2787: 2754: 2721: 2688: 2655: 2622: 2589: 2078:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

1951: 1769:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

2858:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2825:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2792:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2759:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2726:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2693:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2660:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2627:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2594:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2330:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1603: 1589: 1575:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1549:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1523:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2353:

First off, thanks for your service in SAC. I know you're as much a USAF historian and org nut on Knowledge as I am; I wanted to pass this along.

2131: 1822: 1568: 1542: 1516: 1368: 1361: 65: 1935: 1909: 2948:

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

4631: 4521: 4467: 4453: 4413: 4305: 4197: 4089: 3971: 3863: 3755: 3637: 3529: 3421: 3313: 3205: 3036: 2434: 2430: 2414: 2410: 2127: 1867: 1852: 1818: 232: 49: 2812: 987:

deployed to carry out the bombing missions was redesignated 'Provisional' for the period that they were at Andersen AFB? Best regards again,

2918: 846: 178: 146: 2487: 2469: 3044: 2971:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 2438: 2147: 1896: 1838: 1731: 832: 309: 25:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

1086:

There is no article about MAJCOM wings at the moment. I have added a section on the difference between AFCON and MAJCOM wings to the

712: 705: 2280: 2269: 2261: 2243: 228: 69: 4392: 1072:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_USAF_Air_Refueling_Training_Wings_assigned_to_Strategic_Air_Command

1016:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_USAF_Air_Refueling_Training_Wings_assigned_to_Strategic_Air_Command

190:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

4176: 3400: 3292: 1950:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge or discuss the relevant issues at 4610: 2914: 2550: 2465: 1967: 1943: 898: 752: 4359: 4345: 3508: 4635: 4525: 4417: 4309: 4201: 4093: 4068: 3975: 3867: 3759: 3641: 3533: 3425: 3317: 3209: 3184: 3080: 2112: 2108: 1884: 1803: 1799: 1719: 821: 564: 546: 491:

Most of those aircraft you are mentioning (F-51, F-82, F-86, C-124) were operated by TAC or MATS, not SAC. According to the

298: 221: 217: 121: 4143: 4129: 3655: 3367: 3353: 3259: 3245: 2614: 1702: 1687: 68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

4575: 4561: 3020: 3012: 2845: 2779: 2713: 2680: 2210: 2185: 2171: 2102: 1793: 1760: 1745: 211: 3734: 3475: 3461: 2581: 4035: 4021: 3151: 3137: 2849: 2816: 2783: 2750: 2717: 2684: 2651: 2618: 2585: 2321: 2317: 2043: 1618: 1512: 774: 770: 279: 34: 22: 2905:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2398:

the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

1621:, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add 1178:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Aerospace Reconnaissance Technical Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

4623: 4579: 4557: 4513: 4471: 4449: 4405: 4363: 4341: 4297: 4255: 4233: 4189: 4147: 4125: 4081: 4039: 4017: 3963: 3921: 3899: 3855: 3813: 3791: 3747: 3705: 3683: 3629: 3587: 3565: 3521: 3479: 3457: 3413: 3371: 3349: 3305: 3263: 3241: 3197: 3155: 3133: 2910: 1939: 1858: 1693: 1485:

with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1436:

with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1387:

with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1338:

with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1289:

with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1233:

with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1184:

with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1135:

with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

663: 602: 253: 957:

Again thanks for the detailed info on the Prov Wings type use for Linebacker II etc. We now have four pages covering

4284: 3950: 3842: 3701: 3687: 3616: 3076: 3061: 340: 4627: 4517: 4409: 4301: 4193: 4085: 3967: 3859: 3751: 3633: 3525: 3417: 3309: 3201: 3040: 3005: 2998: 2483: 2422: 2265: 1470: 1421: 1372: 1323: 1274: 1258:

DECIMATE THE HISTORY OF THE FINEST COMMAND THAT EVER WAS I CAN'T FIGHT THE BULL-s+++ 16:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

1218: 1169: 1120: 816: 293: 116: 3989: 3096: 1538: 614: 948:

Hey thanks for the information on the Provisional Wings. Were they ever used before the 1990-91 Gulf War? Cheers

132: 54: 4251: 4237: 3917: 3903: 3809: 3795: 3583: 3569: 3101: 2746: 2647: 2389: 2025: 2000: 1986: 1564: 105: 97: 805: 691: 632:

so I've moved your response there. Um, I've also referred this to the MilHist wikiproject's lead coordinator,

2039: 1671:. I’d like to get broader inputs and would appreciate your suggestions on improving the proposal. Thanks, 1654: 2069: 2054: 911:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Air Refueling Training Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

156: 1667:

As an editor who has been active in working on air force-related articles, I’d appreciate your input on a

729: 513:

command that used them. The B-17 article is wrong. I do not wish to argue this subject further. Check out

29: 2979: 2554: 2546: 1676: 1668: 1054: 568: 550: 459: 370: 257: 61: 2941: 2526:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 2393:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2073:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1764:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1650: 1227:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Strategic Weaspons Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

1637:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add

653:, or something of the sort, if it's seen as useful to keep the history of the number together. Cheers 650: 4547: 4439: 4331: 4223: 4115: 4007: 3889: 3781: 3673: 3555: 3447: 3339: 3231: 3123: 2863: 2830: 2797: 2764: 2731: 2698: 2665: 2632: 2599: 2531: 2491: 2418: 2337: 2302: 1947: 1871: 1706: 1497:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. 1448:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. 1399:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. 1350:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. 1301:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. 1245:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. 1196:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. 1147:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. 593: 492: 348: 390:

When downloading photos from the Air Force Historical Research Agency files, you should use use the

4639: 4529: 4421: 4313: 4205: 4097: 3979: 3871: 3763: 3645: 3537: 3429: 3321: 3213: 2906: 1080: 1058: 853: 724: 633: 537: 82: 1489:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

1440:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

1391:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

1342:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

1293:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

1237:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

1188:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

1139:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

1005: 991: 981: 952: 943: 613:. Would it be possible to split it in such a way that makes it more readable, maybe by separating 2953: 2135: 2096: 2085: 1826: 1787: 1776: 1067: 1011: 873: 738: 261: 205: 194: 44: 1479:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Provisional Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

1430:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Provisional Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

1381:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Provisional Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

1332:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Provisional Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

1283:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Provisional Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

78:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --

2195:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

2010:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1915: 4606: 4537: 4496: 4429: 4388: 4321: 4280: 4213: 4172: 4105: 4064: 3997: 3946: 3879: 3838: 3771: 3730: 3663: 3612: 3545: 3504: 3437: 3396: 3329: 3288: 3221: 3180: 3115: 2972: 2882: 2873: 1129:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Strategic Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

998: 974: 958: 646: 239: 3114:-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the 1019: 2902: 2886: 2512:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

2060: 1751: 1672: 1498: 1449: 1400: 1351: 1302: 1246: 1197: 1148: 1095: 1031: 918: 789: 519: 482: 2901:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4543: 4435: 4327: 4219: 4111: 4003: 3885: 3777: 3669: 3551: 3443: 3335: 3227: 3119: 2859: 2826: 2793: 2760: 2727: 2694: 2661: 2628: 2595: 2527: 2363: 2331: 2298: 2288: 2257: 2230: 2200: 2015: 1975: 1889: 1724: 1642: 1626: 1099: 1002: 988: 978: 949: 940: 877: 695: 681: 671: 667: 654: 637: 618: 2291:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that

3033:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

1870:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge takes 1705:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge takes 1617:, articles that do not meet basic Knowledge criteria may be deleted at any time. Please 1018:

This is wikipedia's normal Articles for Deletion (AfD) process. As both I say above and

497:

Following World War II, the B-17 was obsolete, and the Army Air Force retired the fleet'

3111: 2898: 2890: 2566: 2160: 1576: 1550: 1524: 1166:

List of USAF Aerospace Reconnaissance Technical Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

1159:

List of USAF Aerospace Reconnaissance Technical Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

1091: 1042: 828: 777:. If you want any help with the wing pages just give me a yell - I'll be happy to help 610: 305: 128: 87: 79: 2482:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

2177: 1992: 1595: 913:. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article 187:

the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

182:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 4593: 4483: 4375: 4267: 4159: 4051: 3933: 3825: 3717: 3599: 3491: 3383: 3275: 3167: 2894: 2523: 2516:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

2513: 2506: 2495: 2354: 2284: 2279:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

2273: 2214:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 2189: 2141: 2029:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 2004: 1959: 1927: 1832: 1614: 1607: 1494: 1486: 1482: 1474: 1445: 1437: 1433: 1425: 1396: 1388: 1384: 1376: 1347: 1339: 1335: 1327: 1298: 1290: 1286: 1278: 1242: 1234: 1230: 1222: 1193: 1185: 1181: 1173: 1144: 1136: 1132: 1124: 902: 415: 359: 283: 265: 39: 2503:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Strategic Air Command Group and Wing emblems gallery

1467:

List of USAF Strategic Aerospace and Missile Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

1460:

List of USAF Strategic Aerospace and Missile Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

649:

have suggested; reduce this page to a list, removing the size problem, and creating

4643: 2444: 1046: 906: 377: 328: 236: 971:

List of USAF Air Refueling Wings (P) Provisional assigned to Strategic Air Command

2407:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

2124:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

1966:

template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to

1815:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

4592: