User talk:Ravenswing

878:

I think that's fine and is what I was hoping to achieve. In the meantime, though, the user in question has continued to evade direct questions about notability criteria and about the use of alternate accounts (the original post on ANI uses the plural and might imply the use of several accounts to edit in special areas). Given that, I'm no longer sure about my previous private position to just leave a community reminder. If you're up for further action, I'd be willing to consider it given leniency.

77: 252:, which holds that names are rendered according to how they are predominantly done in English-language sources. In this case, that's "Odessa." If that's too much for you to swallow, no one forces you to use the English Knowledge, and you're free to do your business on Wikipedias that render the name more to your liking ... except, of course that you and your other random-letter friend have both been indeffed for socking. Buh-bye. 1120: 1178: 1509: 1208: 1255: 1664:

was "sure, dump your work into the existing Hockey Mountain," but that would make a very long page indeed and be a bit much for anyone to curate. Seems like it's time for a Hockey Mountain Range, wouldn't you say? Bring your project live when you feel it's ready, and then post it next to mine at the various Project spots.

615:

multiple paragraphs on that)? Several sentences on farming practices in Ireland? "The Great Western Greenway, created during 2010 and 2011, follows the line's route and has proved to be very successful in attracting visitors to Achill and the surrounding areas." And so on and so forth. The article's full of such fluff.

1416:. But surely, the place we decide where someone is guilty of a crime is in court, and having been convicted it is perfectly reasonable to describe her as a murderer in Wikivoice? I might understand it more if there were massive and consistent doubts about her conviction, but there isn't any any such wider doubts. 1683:

Thanks for the approval! I've been creating this for the past month, but only today did I realize that I probably should have talked to the Hockey Mountaineer himself. I might not do to much with HM apart from this redesign (and the occasional Bruins player to GA). Also, I just realized that you have

877:

I'd hoped that, by giving it a few days, the situation would resolve itself. I don't want to drag people through TBANs if it's not necessary. The ANI thread in question has been quiet; in the meantime, most of the AfDs (7/11) have been closed, some discounting number in favor of quality of arguments.

655:

I think these catchall encyclopedias just do bulletpoint writeups about the size and indepth coverage of a Topps baseball card. I also think (as has been discussed elsewhere) that the likes of BeanieFan and Cbl62 are part of a cadre that are -- with a fair bit of success -- subverting the changes in

508:

on RfA when it comes to lynch mobs and pile-ons. There are many of us out there who've been on Knowledge for decades, have many tens of thousands of edits, and seem to have enough respect to have strangers solicit their advice ... (grins) There are some admins I wouldn't trust to fold party favors,

1663:

I like the work you've done with this, and thank you for highlighting that there are team, history and award topics that need love too. (Also, thank you twice, because you've reminded me that I need to make updates from the end of this past season, and the new HHOF inductees.) My immediate thought

1803:

The reference I cited was from August 31, 2024, not a year ago, and is a local source - MassLive, the Mass stands for Massachusetts. Here in your reply you correctly say it was Saturday morning, but in the article you are editing it to say September 1st - which was yesterday, Sunday, and incorrect.

1745:

In the interest of transparency, it is true that I have a bit of a history with this individual on other platforms (I have elaborated on the talk page), but I will say that the edits I have made are designed to be productive and in the article’s best interest. I don’t expect my contributions not to

918:

I currently would not support a TBAN pending tangible results and replies to my inquiry on the Gupta AfD. I think that it's obvious that they're newer to AfD, and they definitely seem to have taken inquiries as bites. I do think that they are very constructive outside of deletion discussions, and I

614:

Take a peek at the Mission, Monastery, Railway, Valley House, Deserted Village and Other Places of Interest sections in particular. Alleged prophecies? A couple sentences on a NN pastor's wife who died over 150 years ago? A monk seemingly notable only for writing a bio of an alleged murderer (and

410:

nerve claiming anything about my editing history; I was active on hockey topics on Knowledge a dozen years before you registered, and have over ten times your edits. (Never mind that it's mindboggling that you're "encouraging" me to open a discussion on a talk page you have never frequented, and on

938:

Thing is, the real concerning thing is the falsification of the headline in the Garnett article. Nothing else would, on their own, garner more than a slap-on-the-wrist day or three block. But the bogus headline, paired with all the stonewalling, points to the unfortunate obvious: we cannot trust

898:

I'm up for supporting it, but I shouldn't be the one to instigate it; aside from that it'd be seen as headhunting given the number of posts I've made on the subject, I recently proposed and got through a community and topic ban on another editor. If I don't want to be accused of being the Madame

210:

Not necessarily. At ANI, a lack of response means considerably more often than otherwise nothing more than that no one cared enough to respond. All those who participate regularly at ANI see a lot of drama, there's very little new under the sun, and sometimes we just shrug and move on. Silence

390:

As such, I’ll be reverting your edits for now, but I encourage you to open a discussion at the WP and invite frequent editors (Sbaio, Ho-ju, Deadman, and others, for example) to comment on what should be done regarding the tables/lists. Until then, please hold off for the time being. I hope this

382:

The tables w/ notability qualifications are how first/last games have been handled for upwards of a decade and a half, with seemingly no other users (especially those who frequently edit season pages) having issues with their inclusion; when I see them removed by a lone editor with an infrequent

1607:

I appreciate you correcting my error on the block length at ANI. I should have looked closer at the text, I think it's just a general habit of mine when it comes to closing discussions since most of the ones I close have ended in that fashion. Sorry about that, and thank you for correcting me.

1000:

I understand. But I prefer to not sanction when it's not needed. I'd prefer to get involved in some different drama at this point. I have projects to do and a life to live. If they're not to be trusted, their actions will bear that out, and it'll pop back onto ANI. For now, though, it's a dead

678:

editors arguing that an article can be based almost entirely on quotes from the individual (and objecting to that is BLUDGEONING with my "interpretation of policy" that "other users disagree with") and defending a user who has dumped 15+-link refbombs of club announcements, transactional

1426:. So basically a blocked advocacy editor has got some people persuaded that we shouldn't call her a killer. It really just smacks of pro-Letby editorialising to not allow her to be referred to as a killer, surely that is the norm on Knowledge, to refer to serial killers like 984:

I'm not, myself; with MIAJudges' repeated stonewalling, we just seem to be taking his unsupported word for everything, and after the Garnett business, he's just not to be trusted. Nothing much to be done about that, though; either an admin demands some answers, or none do.

1089:

You'll notice in the edit screen that there's Cite listed at the top. That opens up a drop down screen where you fill in various fields, and that generates the appropriate citation template. Please feel free to drop me a line if you need further/more comprehensive tips.

697:

Can you please justify your assertion that I am "subverting the changes in NSPORTS by just finding some reason, no matter how threadbare, to vote to Keep any sports bio at AfD." The facts are that (i) I vote "delete", "merge", "redirect", or "userfy" in 65.3% of AfDs (see

1188:

Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Knowledge. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity.

1666:

As far as feedback on it goes, what struck me right off was the rank columns. I'd eliminate those, just by way of them being pains to update, unless you don't mind the ministerial task every year. Other than that, I don't see a thing wrong with your work. Well done.

503:

But I'll buck the tide in another point. Admins are not consecrated elites; they've just gotten through a broken process where the path to success is often to have been as inoffensive as possible and have nothing to hang Opposes from, because let me tell you, ANI has

734:'s page? The Sabres still have one more game tonight, and although he won't be suiting up for the game, I don't think he's retired yet, even though he said last night that he was retiring. Could you look into this and let me know if it's all good or not? Thanks, 357:

Oh, absolutely, I mean to tackle them all. As far as EBUGs go, those are ephemeral novelty acts that the press plays up in the moment, but emergency goalies aren't anything new. The lines of Claude Cyr or Julian Klymkiw aren't mentioned in Debuts either.

440:, but I felt generally indecisive enough as to whether it would actually help or hinder the discussion. So I decided to solicit advice from someone who's become increasingly experienced with resolving disputes on the drama-boards. (Hey, that's you!) 1481:

I don't mind talk page messages along the lines of "You were a participant in X conversation, and it's started up again, let us know what you think." I very much mind talk page messages that pitch a strongly partisan POV, such as this one, and

1419:

What I also think is quite improper is that the whole debate was started when the already-blocked Richard Gill apparently appeared again(!) to evade his block and suggest the whole intro be changed to claim she is just an "alleged" killer:

899:

Defarge of ANI, I shouldn't be instigating those very often. If you're willing to do so -- and while the sum of MIAJudges' actions might not be too egregious, their stonewalling of every inquiry is -- I'll be marching right on behind.

501:) I wouldn't change that if I could; I have seen way too many people get away with murder for way too long -- the Lugnutses and MickMacNees of the world -- to want to take this tool to remove bad actors out of the community's keyboards. 491:

Well ... the fact on the ground is that the community is allowed to levy such sanctions at ANI, and that's not changing any time soon. Indeed, pile-ons happen, and I readily admit to having participated in them. (Then again, I've also

1398:

Between that and your curious belief that being found guilty at trial is not held to be synonymous with being guilty, you will perhaps forgive us for not as confident as you are that your expertise trumps all other considerations and

496:

any number of pile-ons, and a catchphrase I've repeated an uncomfortable number of times at ANI is that if we at Knowledge dislike the slur of the radical right echo chamber casting us as running left-wing woke witch hunts, it's best

61:

To the degree you might care, by the bye, I'm male, but I don't snarl with rage if misgendered; it's a good bit less less by way of travail and indignity than half the human race put up with for pretty much the entire

298:

than the OP reflected the sentiment of the close: that EEng should behave better, and that there was no call for action beyond that; a classic case of SNOW. Do you anticipate a sudden surge of calls for sanctions?

314:

Sanctions? No, that's quite impossible. Some day I'd love to see a gentle acknowledgement from EEng that he at least realizes the burden he places on the rest of the community. I doubt that's happening either.

512:

And you're allowed to make them as well. I haven't delved into that particular dispute so as to have an informed opinion, but you have. If you think a tban is an overreaction, say so! And certainly doing so

1768:

Hi, thank you for your edit, however the original date was correct as is stated in the reference. Further, my edit was also made after the hospital closed, so I don't believe I jumped the gun in any respect.

213:

With that, seeing as this was putatively your first edit on Knowledge, demonstrably you're operating a sockpuppet account, likely to evade a block. Would you like to know how many admins watch my talk page?

1866: 963:

explanation for the multiple accounts thing; it's not incompatible with the (diff revdeled) statements made at ANI. In any case, if there are other active accounts, behavioral evidence would be obvious.

838:

and I don't see that you have posted an entry on this page. This is part of the process. Did you mistakenly post on the June 20th log page? If so, please change the link on the redirect page. Thank you.

406:

Ummm, no. Using tables is a relatively recent thing, only over the last couple of years, done unilaterally, and that much only in recent NHL seasons. And with that, you are displaying some

234:

I just thought I ought to answer you somewhere. This doesn’t change the fact that the community decides to write Odesa, but the admins insist on using the wrong name Odessa in this article. -

550:

It's interesting, the more I lean on my gut feeling nowadays, the more I seem to be rewarded by it. Thanks for your feedback! I'm not sure I would have gone ahead with my post otherwise. --

1644:

Hello there. I haven't talked much about this, but I have been working on a revamp of Hockey Mountain, expanding it to be a bit larger than what it currently is. I'll leave the link to it

1788:, local TV stations and the neighborhood newspaper, all referencing the correct date and time of Saturday morning, and I could have included numerous others were bludgeoning called for. 1020:

Not quite so unconscious now; MIA shot themselves in the foot big time. Take a look at the thread now. This is going straight to community ban, do not pass Go, do not collect $ 200.

637: 636:

I might be misremembering, but at some AfD I recall you mentioning something about Rank and File not being a sufficiently SIGCOV source for GNG. I'm curious what your thoughts are on

1706:: Another thing — Having Hockey Mtn. be one of your user subpages works, but it would feel more official if it was a subpage of WikiProject Ice Hockey itself. I suggest moving HM to 1739:

with another user continue to escalate. Rather than blow this up into an edit war, and seeing as the user has summoned an admin’s presence, could you review the latest topic on the

379:

I want to make it clear I’m not necessarily opposed to your changes, as consensus can certainly evolve over time; my issue is primarily with how you’re going about these changes.

1707: 1586:

It did. Gah. And we've been working under the happy presumption that we'd seen the last of Dolovis. Well. If he gets back to his usual tricks, time for another ANI thread.

835: 1464: 347:. I remember the last discussion at WT:NHL about first and last games, but cannot seem to remember if the addition of emergency backup goaltenders was discussed... – 939:

this editor, and they are giving us no reason to do so. I really don't want to go over every one of their articlespace edits to see what else they've falsified.

679:

announcements, blogs, and passing mentions into 100+ AfDs. And these articles get kept because the same group who oppose NSPORTS2022 make it a point to !vote in

1648:. I'm not done making this new version of Hockey Mountain, but if you could go over it and give me some feedback, that would be very much appreciated. Thanks. 1045:

Lou has lived in Greenfield for 9 years- I have tried adding a link to a Recorder article here and it will not let me. A google search will offer quick proof

610:

Simply put, it's just riddled with "local color" items that are poorly or unsourced, and which I'd expect to see in a locally-produced walking tour guidebook

411:

which I've just short of a thousand edits.) Your condescending tone concerning what you will deign to permit or not, to put it mildly, is quite uncivil.

277:

Apologies for stepping on your toes there, but I think the discussion could do to run a little longer. I don't think haste was called for in closing it.

1740: 59:

This user talk page is watched by several friendly editors, and someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is always appreciated.

1865:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

1449: 1446: 1784:

The original date was WRONG; your reference was from an out of town newspaper a month ago. The several references I added were from the

1736: 1283:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! 825: 443:

My concern is thus: As much as I feel the points being made about Fleur's conduct are valid, this has the unpleasant connotation of a

656:

NSPORTS by just finding some reason, no matter how threadbare, to vote to Keep any sports bio at AfD. It's just exhausting, is all.

1547: 1060:

I do know how, found the article to which you might have been referring, and added the link: go take a look to see how that's done.

1385:

Hi there and merry Christmas! I'm just messaging as, quite a while ago now, you were party to the discussion about the COI editor

594:. I was looking at the All articles with a promotional tone cat and picked this article at random. What is promo in it exactly? 1529: 919:

don't want to lose that. If I did propose a TBAN, it would at the very least see leniency in the form of a brief ban period.

387:, I’m obviously going to revert them as it seems like a unilateral interpretation of guidelines rather than a consensus one. 130: 1424: 1394: 164:

Hi Ravenswing. The user with whom I had a dispute has changed their UP to a personal attack. Please address as you see fit.

1553: 192: 134: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 94: 1439: 1431: 1410:"is a British former neonatal nurse, convicted of the serial murder of seven infants and attempted murder of six others" 195:, I think that very. Also nobody has explained it in WP:ANI which suggests all editors who saw it knew that I’m right. - 459:

I feel that way, but I do think it would be useful to have uninvolved admins making that call. We very recently had a

731: 683:

AfD while the rest of the community, who made their opinion clear at the RfC, don't participate in sportsperson AfDs.

517:, as opposed to after a half-dozen pile-ons get into the game, is good timing. Your voice is as valid as any others. 1869:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 1862: 1856: 1521: 144: 1525: 1453: 433: 30:

If you post to my talk page, I will reply here. If I posted to your talk page, I will look for responses there.

1746:

be malleable, but I am working to curb it from any sourcing or bias issues, which seems to be the case here.

239: 758: 336: 1818:

Blah, you're right, and my bad; for some reason I had my head turned around to think Saturday was the 1st.

1335:

Merry Christmas to you! Thank you for all your help with writing better articles. Have a nice Christmas. –

344: 340: 1613: 200: 1279:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

1541: 1533: 1304: 1265: 1412:. So basically, they want to get rid of her being called a serial killer, on various grounds including 1080: 1050: 1576: 1139: 703: 706:#5 dozens and dozens of times since its adoption last year as a basis to delete sports biographies. 1838: 1809: 1774: 1645: 1472: 1346: 1292: 748: 688: 645: 384: 319: 281: 1754: 1276: 1134:

Hello, I wanted to be the first to wish you the very best during the holidays. Glad to know you.

1076: 1046: 794: 754: 235: 173: 150: 1685: 1609: 1517: 1483: 563: 479: 460: 396: 1537: 1513: 1300: 1261: 1011: 974: 929: 888: 798: 597: 146: 76: 509:

let alone with the mop, and a lot of community members I trust to make such judgment calls.

1874: 1715: 1703: 1693: 1653: 1572: 1435: 1423:- EXACTLY the same wording he'd suspiciously been asking for on his own Twitter account!: 1386: 1380: 1372: 1288: 1135: 742: 711: 611: 585: 348: 196: 1152:

Hah, as it happens, you are! Thank you kindly, and happy holidays back atcha! Regards,

1834: 1805: 1770: 1468: 1336: 745: 684: 641: 448: 444: 316: 278: 1226: 1119: 1750: 1568: 1216: 1190: 699: 591: 437: 249: 169: 1200: 1524:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to 1465:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Banned editor canvassing for an RfC

1269: 1207: 552: 535:

Aaaaaand ... it looks like your statement had the result you wanted. Good on you.

468: 392: 339:

and thought of looking at older season pages. Such first games are also present at

17: 1314:

Aw, thank you kindly, old comrade! And may your own Christmas be merry as well.

834:

I see you tagged this redirect as being discussed at an RFD but the link goes to

793:: it's impressive if you were able to type the sentence in 1/15th of a second :P 455:

weather topics broadly construed. That makes me very uncomfortable. I don't know

1299:

Keep up the great work! You're one of the best editors on Knowledge. Thank you.

1177: 1002: 965: 920: 879: 808:

Gah! I meant the other way around, of course -- thanks for pointing that out!

1870: 1711: 1689: 1649: 1390: 707: 1427: 1280: 1272: 48:

Want to blow off steam? Run around your block a dozen times or so instead.

148: 841: 166:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Justinw303&action=history

1878: 1842: 1828: 1813: 1798: 1778: 1758: 1719: 1697: 1677: 1657: 1633: 1617: 1596: 1580: 1557: 1508: 1496: 1476: 1457: 1365: 1349: 1324: 1308: 1242: 1162: 1143: 1100: 1084: 1070: 1054: 1030: 1015: 995: 978: 949: 933: 909: 892: 866: 850: 818: 802: 778: 762: 715: 692: 666: 649: 625: 604: 569: 545: 527: 485: 421: 400: 368: 351: 322: 309: 284: 262: 243: 224: 204: 177: 1254: 1414:"I don't think we can assert in Wiki's voice that she is a murderer" 1571:. It seems as if his topic ban expired some time ago? Best wishes. 768:

Sportsnet confirmed it, and the link to the source is on the page.

1075:

Thank you- I looked at how you linked it- that is really helpful

1532:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on 466:

Let me know if you think it's a point worth bringing up there.

1404:

But now some editors want to replace the first line that says

151: 70: 1516:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1710:, because a Featured Topic Drive is pretty much what HM is. 1253: 856:

No, I pulled it once I saw that you'd deleted the original.

1728:

Continued conflicts on Tom & Jerry (2021 American film)

1684:

a Bruins userbox on your user page. Feel free to check out

1833:

I've made that mistake before. Happens to the best of us!

1389:

who was reported on ANI for advocacy in trying to portray

451:

members are calling for someone to be topic-banned from

1421: 960: 790: 165: 1708:

Knowledge:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Featured Topic Drive

1528:

and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at

1486:. That just earned you a block. Don't do it again. 383:

history on hockey season pages and no discussion at

836:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 19

1406:"British serial killer and former neonatal nurse" 1567:FYI, Dolovis created an ice hockey biography at 1396:. As you absolutely correctly said at the time: 1295:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 590:I was wondering why you put an advert tag on 8: 1232:Thank you kindly, and the same back at you! 211:does not suggest that people agree with you. 331:Emergency backup goaltender and first games 290:I'm not going to raise a fuss over it, but 1172: 432:I was going to make an individual post to 674:. Tell me about it. There are currently 391:clears up some of the supposed tension. 1397: 1275:! This greeting (and season) promotes 671: 188: 1287:Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ 7: 1737:Tom & Jerry (2021 American film) 1688:sometime! Once again, thanks a lot. 1373:Talk:Lucy Letby#RFC on Lead sentence 826:Algeria at the 2024 Summer Olympics 612:rather than in a Knowledge article. 1484:invite me to jump on the bandwagon 187:Hi, I saw in WP:ANI your question 25: 1623:Quite alright! Bobbles happen. 1507: 1206: 1176: 1118: 189:How stupid do they think we are? 75: 959:Noting that I'm satisfied with 1855:Good article reassessment for 1101:21:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC) 1085:19:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC) 1071:19:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC) 1055:04:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC) 746:once said, "I woke up in a new 1: 1879:22:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 1843:14:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 1829:14:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 1814:13:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 1799:08:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 1779:07:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 1597:18:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC) 1581:18:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC) 1563:Return of a topic-banned user 1497:11:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC) 1477:14:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC) 1458:10:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC) 1366:02:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC) 1350:21:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1325:04:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1309:03:40, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1243:04:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1227:02:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1201:02:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1163:17:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC) 1144:15:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC) 447:, particularly the fact that 401:20:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC) 369:22:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 352:16:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 193:Special:MobileDiff/1135086686 43:I am disinterested in flames. 1764:Your edit to Carney Hospital 1558:23:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC) 1440:John Duffy and David Mulcahy 1185:Merry Christmas, Ravenswing! 1182: 672:It's just exhausting, is all 323:21:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 310:21:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 285:20:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 263:09:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC) 244:09:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC) 225:21:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC) 205:16:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC) 178:14:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 1759:23:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1520:, but you didn't provide a 1205: 716:10:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 1894: 1863:Ottawa Senators (original) 1857:Ottawa Senators (original) 1355:And the same back at you! 1175: 779:07:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC) 763:13:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC) 693:23:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC) 667:06:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC) 650:03:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC) 626:10:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 605:08:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 1720:16:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 1698:20:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1678:20:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1658:12:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1634:22:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 1618:19:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 1530:referencing for beginners 1393:as wrongfully convicted: 1168: 1124: 1117: 1031:13:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC) 1016:03:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC) 996:02:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC) 979:01:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC) 867:01:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC) 851:01:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC) 702:), and (ii) I have cited 570:13:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 546:09:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 528:15:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC) 486:13:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC) 422:01:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC) 950:19:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC) 934:18:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC) 910:17:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC) 893:16:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC) 819:00:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC) 803:23:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC) 463:about this very matter. 294:who's commented so far 1749:Thank you in advance. 1258: 1001:(unconscious?) horse. 640:AfD (already closed)? 375:First/last game tables 1257: 1741:article’s talk page? 248:So does Knowledge's 191:based on edits like 1293:User:Flaming/MC2008 1268:) is wishing you a 831:Hello, Ravenswing, 292:every single editor 18:User talk:RGTraynor 1526:include a citation 1259: 1169:Season's Greetings 743:A very wise person 1867:reassessment page 1518:Pope Benedict XVI 1214: 1213: 1149: 1148: 567: 499:not to have them. 483: 157: 156: 16:(Redirected from 1885: 1825: 1795: 1674: 1630: 1593: 1536:. Thank you. ‑‑ 1511: 1493: 1445:serial killers? 1384: 1362: 1342: 1331:Merry Christmas! 1321: 1239: 1223: 1220: 1210: 1197: 1194: 1180: 1173: 1159: 1122: 1115: 1114: 1097: 1067: 1027: 1014: 1008: 992: 977: 971: 946: 932: 926: 906: 891: 885: 863: 849: 815: 775: 730:Could you check 663: 622: 602: 600: 589: 561: 556: 542: 524: 477: 472: 461:huge Arbcom case 418: 365: 306: 259: 221: 152: 79: 71: 68: 67: 66: 65: 64: 54: 45: 37: 31: 21: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1860: 1821: 1791: 1766: 1730: 1670: 1642: 1640:Hockey Mountain 1626: 1605: 1589: 1565: 1522:reliable source 1505: 1489: 1436:Peter Sutcliffe 1387:Richard D. Gill 1378: 1376: 1358: 1338: 1333: 1317: 1297: 1281:Merry Christmas 1251: 1249:Merry Christmas 1235: 1221: 1218: 1195: 1192: 1171: 1155: 1113: 1093: 1063: 1043: 1023: 1010: 1003: 988: 973: 966: 942: 928: 921: 902: 887: 880: 875: 859: 840: 829: 811: 787: 771: 728: 659: 634: 618: 598: 596: 583: 580: 554: 538: 520: 470: 430: 414: 377: 361: 333: 302: 275: 255: 250:Manual of Style 217: 185: 162: 160:Personal attack 153: 147: 84: 69: 58: 57: 52: 46: 41: 40: 35: 29: 27: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1891: 1889: 1859: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1765: 1762: 1729: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1700: 1686:my Bruins page 1641: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1604: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1564: 1561: 1504: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1479: 1450:213.31.104.198 1447:213.31.104.198 1375: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1284: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1212: 1211: 1204: 1187: 1181: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1147: 1146: 1131: 1130: 1128:Happy Holidays 1125: 1123: 1112: 1111:Happy Holidays 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 913: 912: 874: 871: 870: 869: 828: 823: 822: 821: 786: 783: 782: 781: 732:Craig Anderson 727: 726:Craig Anderson 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 633: 630: 629: 628: 579: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 532: 531: 429: 426: 425: 424: 376: 373: 372: 371: 332: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 274: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 229: 228: 184: 181: 161: 158: 155: 154: 149: 145: 143: 140: 139: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 90: 89: 86: 85: 80: 74: 56: 55: 39: 38: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1890: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1858: 1854: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1824: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1796: 1794: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1763: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1733: 1727: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1676: 1675: 1673: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1639: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1629: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1602: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1592: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1569:Yan Kuznetsov 1562: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1510: 1502: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1492: 1485: 1480: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1448: 1444: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1422: 1417: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1402: 1400: 1395: 1392: 1388: 1382: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1364: 1363: 1361: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1341: 1330: 1326: 1323: 1322: 1320: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1296: 1294: 1290: 1285: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1256: 1248: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1209: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1198: 1186: 1179: 1174: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1158: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1110: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1096: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1066: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1040: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1026: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1006: 999: 998: 997: 994: 993: 991: 983: 982: 981: 980: 976: 972: 969: 962: 951: 948: 947: 945: 937: 936: 935: 931: 927: 924: 917: 916: 915: 914: 911: 908: 907: 905: 897: 896: 895: 894: 890: 886: 883: 872: 868: 865: 864: 862: 855: 854: 853: 852: 848: 846: 845: 837: 832: 827: 824: 820: 817: 816: 814: 807: 806: 805: 804: 800: 796: 792: 784: 780: 777: 776: 774: 767: 766: 765: 764: 760: 756: 755:BubbaDaAmogus 752: 750: 747: 744: 740: 735: 733: 725: 717: 713: 709: 705: 704:WP:SPORTBASIC 701: 696: 695: 694: 690: 686: 682: 677: 673: 670: 669: 668: 665: 664: 662: 654: 653: 652: 651: 647: 643: 639: 631: 627: 624: 623: 621: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 603: 601: 593: 592:Achill Island 587: 578:Achill Island 577: 571: 568: 565: 558: 557: 549: 548: 547: 544: 543: 541: 534: 533: 530: 529: 526: 525: 523: 516: 510: 507: 500: 495: 490: 489: 488: 487: 484: 481: 474: 473: 464: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 441: 439: 435: 427: 423: 420: 419: 417: 409: 408:extraordinary 405: 404: 403: 402: 398: 394: 388: 386: 380: 374: 370: 367: 366: 364: 356: 355: 354: 353: 350: 346: 342: 338: 330: 324: 321: 318: 313: 312: 311: 308: 307: 305: 297: 293: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 280: 272: 264: 261: 260: 258: 251: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 236:Fnursvjuedvhy 233: 232: 231: 230: 227: 226: 223: 222: 220: 209: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 182: 180: 179: 175: 171: 167: 159: 142: 141: 138: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 91: 88: 87: 83: 78: 73: 72: 63: 51: 50: 49: 44: 34: 33: 32: 19: 1861: 1822: 1820: 1819: 1792: 1790: 1789: 1786:Boston Globe 1785: 1767: 1748: 1744: 1735:Tensions on 1734: 1731: 1671: 1669: 1668: 1665: 1643: 1627: 1625: 1624: 1610:JeffSpaceman 1606: 1590: 1588: 1587: 1566: 1550: 1544: 1534:my talk page 1506: 1503:January 2024 1490: 1488: 1487: 1442: 1432:Steve Wright 1418: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1403: 1377: 1359: 1357: 1356: 1347:Meddela mig! 1339: 1337: 1334: 1318: 1316: 1315: 1298: 1286: 1260: 1236: 1234: 1233: 1217: 1215: 1191: 1184: 1183: 1156: 1154: 1153: 1127: 1094: 1092: 1091: 1064: 1062: 1061: 1044: 1024: 1022: 1021: 1004: 989: 987: 986: 967: 958: 943: 941: 940: 922: 903: 901: 900: 881: 876: 860: 858: 857: 843: 842: 833: 830: 812: 810: 809: 788: 785:Speed typing 772: 770: 769: 753: 738: 736: 729: 681:almost every 680: 675: 660: 658: 657: 635: 632:Your opinion 619: 617: 616: 595: 581: 560: 551: 539: 537: 536: 521: 519: 518: 514: 511: 505: 502: 498: 493: 476: 467: 465: 456: 452: 442: 431: 428:ANI and WPTC 415: 413: 412: 407: 389: 385:WP:ICEHOCKEY 381: 378: 362: 360: 359: 334: 303: 301: 300: 295: 291: 276: 256: 254: 253: 218: 216: 215: 212: 186: 163: 135:Rant Archive 93: 81: 60: 47: 42: 28: 1823:Ravenswing 1793:Ravenswing 1672:Ravenswing 1628:Ravenswing 1591:Ravenswing 1538:Neveselbert 1514:Neveselbert 1512:Hello, I'm 1491:Ravenswing 1469:Sirfurboy🏄 1463:Please see 1360:Ravenswing 1319:Ravenswing 1301:Masterhatch 1262:Masterhatch 1237:Ravenswing 1157:Ravenswing 1095:Ravenswing 1065:Ravenswing 1025:Ravenswing 990:Ravenswing 944:Ravenswing 904:Ravenswing 861:Ravenswing 813:Ravenswing 773:Ravenswing 661:Ravenswing 620:Ravenswing 599:scope_creep 555:WaltClipper 540:Ravenswing 522:Ravenswing 471:WaltClipper 434:this thread 416:Ravenswing 363:Ravenswing 304:Ravenswing 257:Ravenswing 219:Ravenswing 131:Archive #10 1704:Ravenswing 1573:Flibirigit 1391:Lucy Letby 1381:Ravenswing 1340:Poriman55 1136:Lightburst 1041:Lou Barlow 1012:parlez moi 975:parlez moi 930:parlez moi 889:parlez moi 789:Regarding 586:Ravenswing 197:Gueshutbjk 127:Archive #9 123:Archive #8 119:Archive #7 115:Archive #6 111:Archive #5 107:Archive #4 103:Archive #3 99:Archive #2 95:Archive #1 1835:Mangocove 1806:Mangocove 1771:Mangocove 1603:Thank you 1428:Fred West 1273:Christmas 873:AfDs, ANI 791:this edit 685:JoelleJay 642:JoelleJay 337:this edit 317:Mackensen 279:Mackensen 183:An answer 62:Holocene. 1751:Ciscocat 1548:contribs 1277:WikiLove 676:multiple 170:NEDOCHAN 82:Archives 1732:Hello, 749:Buga'i! 506:nothing 494:opposed 449:WP:WPTC 445:pile-on 393:The Kip 345:2017–18 341:2019–20 168:Thanks 1077:ABar72 1047:ABar72 795:isaacl 438:WP:ANI 335:I saw 320:(talk) 282:(talk) 1871:Z1720 1712:XR228 1690:XR228 1650:XR228 1554:email 1399:facts 1289:subst 1270:Merry 1007:seult 970:seult 925:seult 884:seult 739:B D A 708:Cbl62 349:sbaio 296:other 1875:talk 1839:talk 1810:talk 1775:talk 1755:talk 1716:talk 1694:talk 1654:talk 1646:here 1614:talk 1577:talk 1542:talk 1473:talk 1454:talk 1438:and 1305:talk 1266:talk 1222:5969 1219:Onel 1196:5969 1193:Onel 1140:talk 1081:talk 1051:talk 961:this 799:talk 759:talk 712:talk 700:here 689:talk 646:talk 638:this 564:talk 480:talk 397:talk 343:and 273:EEng 240:talk 201:talk 174:talk 1443:as 1408:to 751:"* 582:Hi 515:now 457:why 453:all 436:on 53:* * 36:* * 1877:) 1841:) 1812:) 1777:) 1757:) 1718:) 1696:) 1656:) 1616:) 1579:) 1556:) 1475:) 1467:. 1456:) 1434:, 1430:, 1401:. 1345:- 1307:) 1142:) 1083:) 1053:) 847:iz 801:) 761:) 714:) 691:) 648:) 553:⛵ 469:⛵ 399:) 242:) 203:) 176:) 1873:( 1837:( 1808:( 1773:( 1753:( 1714:( 1702:@ 1692:( 1652:( 1612:( 1575:( 1551:· 1545:· 1540:( 1471:( 1452:( 1383:: 1379:@ 1303:( 1291:: 1264:( 1138:( 1079:( 1049:( 1005:I 968:I 923:I 882:I 844:L 797:( 757:( 741:* 737:- 710:( 687:( 644:( 588:: 584:@ 566:) 562:( 559:- 482:) 478:( 475:- 395:( 238:( 199:( 172:( 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index