438:
31:
118:
343:
I don't have direct access either, but I found it online somewhere last week. The whole reason for positing a population distinct from the extended disk was the gap between 50 and 75 AU, with modeling supporting the hypothesis that it's real and not just an observational artefact (fig. 2). I'll try
203:
Re. your rd, AFAICT, the inner Oort cloud is supposed to start at about 2,000 AU, well beyond the two known inner Oort cloud objects, so that may not be the best place for it. Maybe the article should be moved to "sednoid"? That's probably just as common, and they are by definition sednoids,
223:, whether or not the article should be named "Sednoids" or "inner Oort cloud object" is kind a "on one hand or the other" situation. I think an article on the inner Oort cloud objects are fine, but whether or not the "Sednoids" are inner OCOs is not settled (although
375:
The 50/150AU is their model for the inner Oort cloud, but I don't think everyone accepts this. Their modeling shows a sharp inner edge at ca. 75AU, with little in the intervening space. They do seem to form a population with bodies w perihelia of 30ā50AU. ā
403:
And of course whether that is the same as 'sednoid'. If we found st at 52AU, I rather doubt it would be hailed as a third sednoid, whereas another object near Sedna or further out would be. ā
392:
150 (and also a<1500) as their criteria for an inner Oort cloud object. Whether or not their criteria will be adopted by their colleagues is still to be determined. ā
152:
175:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
227:). The safest approach would be to call the article "Sednoids" with a mention that they are possible candidates for the inner Oort cloud. ā
172:
162:
390:
Thanks for the link. Having read it I agree with
Kheider and your latest note, Trujillo and Sheppard clearly have adopted q: -->
295:
75, with essentially nothing in the range of 50ā75 AU, and that they constitute a new population of objects at q : -->
445:
176:
158:
124:
38:
329:
504:
496:
491:
97:
89:
84:
479:
474:
466:
72:
67:
59:
328:
150. I'd normally consider him a very reliable editor on such matters. Maybe open a discussion with him at
243:
239:
185:
117:
408:
381:
366:
349:
305:
274:
209:
129:
404:
377:
362:
345:
301:
270:
220:
205:
224:
219:(edit conflict, written before you added the "That's probably just as common..." sentence)
294:
50 AU on his web site, but his published article makes a big deal about them being : -->
454:
47:
17:
155:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
359:
319:
250:(although, given your editing experience you probably don't need this pointer). ā
453:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
412:
398:
385:
370:
353:
338:
309:
278:
256:
233:
213:
145:
136:
393:
333:
251:
228:
166:
318:
article, so I can't look for myself. I see from the edit history that
247:
189:
141:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was
432:
112:
25:
204:
regardless of whether someone accepts them as OCO's. ā
225:
Dr. Sheppard certainly is of the opinion that they are
151:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
149:is believed to be an eccentric frozen pink dwarf?
242:for instructions if you decide you want to move
240:Knowledge:Moving_a_page#Moving_over_a_redirect
8:
153:Template:Did you know nominations/2012 VP113
133:was updated with a fact from the article
269:Okay, I'll request to have it moved. ā
451:Do not edit the contents of this page.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
293:BTW, I see that Sheppard has q : -->
24:
436:
116:
29:
1:
330:Talk:Inner Oort cloud object
192:) 16:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
322:is of the opinion that the
314:I don't have access to the
523:
413:09:28, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
399:08:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
386:08:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
371:08:35, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
354:08:03, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
339:05:15, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
310:04:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
279:03:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
257:03:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
234:03:51, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
214:03:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
344:to find it somewhere. ā
171:, and it may be added to
244:Inner Oort cloud object
177:Did you know talk page
449:of past discussions.
300:being irrelevant. ā
42:of past discussions.
326:article uses q: -->
173:the statistics page
109:DYK for 2012 VP113
510:
509:
461:
460:
455:current talk page
397:
337:
255:
232:
183:
182:
170:
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
514:
488:
463:
462:
440:
439:
433:
396:
358:Ah, here you go.
336:
254:
231:
156:
120:
113:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
522:
521:
517:
516:
515:
513:
512:
511:
484:
437:
198:
186:The DYK project
111:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
520:
518:
508:
507:
502:
499:
494:
489:
482:
477:
472:
469:
459:
458:
441:
430:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
373:
356:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
262:
261:
260:
259:
197:
194:
181:
180:
121:
110:
107:
105:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
18:User talk:RP88
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
519:
506:
503:
500:
498:
495:
493:
490:
487:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
470:
468:
465:
464:
456:
452:
448:
447:
442:
435:
434:
431:
414:
410:
406:
402:
401:
400:
395:
391:50 and a: -->
389:
388:
387:
383:
379:
374:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
355:
351:
347:
342:
341:
340:
335:
331:
327:50 and a: -->
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
258:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
201:
195:
193:
191:
187:
178:
174:
168:
164:
160:
154:
150:
148:
147:
140:
139:
138:
132:
131:
126:
122:
119:
115:
114:
108:
106:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
485:
450:
444:
429:
323:
315:
297:
296:75 AU, with
202:
199:
184:
167:daily totals
144:
142:
135:
134:
130:Did you know
128:
125:1 April 2014
104:
78:
43:
37:
443:This is an
196:OCO/sednoid
36:This is an
505:ArchiveĀ 14
497:ArchiveĀ 11
492:ArchiveĀ 10
163:live views
159:here's how
137:2012 VP113
98:ArchiveĀ 14
90:ArchiveĀ 11
85:ArchiveĀ 10
486:ArchiveĀ 9
480:ArchiveĀ 8
475:ArchiveĀ 7
467:ArchiveĀ 5
143:... that
79:ArchiveĀ 9
73:ArchiveĀ 8
68:ArchiveĀ 7
60:ArchiveĀ 5
190:nominate
446:archive
320:Kheider
248:Sednoid
39:archive
324:Nature
316:Nature
405:kwami
378:kwami
363:kwami
346:kwami
302:kwami
271:kwami
221:kwami
206:kwami
200:Hi,
146:Biden
16:<
409:talk
394:RP88
382:talk
367:talk
350:talk
334:RP88
306:talk
275:talk
252:RP88
238:See
229:RP88
210:talk
332:? ā
246:to
123:On
501:ā
471:ā
411:)
384:)
369:)
361:ā
352:)
308:)
277:)
212:)
165:,
161:,
127:,
94:ā
64:ā
457:.
407:(
380:(
365:(
348:(
304:(
298:a
273:(
208:(
188:(
179:.
169:)
157:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
