30:) that were once notable but lately kind of falling off the collective mental map, and it occurred to us that it might be time to document some of the early web days. If you can think of early sites that are worth documenting (right now we're defining "early" as pre-Netscape IPO (1995)) or any good sources on those days, that would be great. Stop by if the mood takes you. Hope things are going well for you otherwise.
457:
248:
54:
21:
Howdy, pardner. I thought you might be interested in (or at least willing to be aware of) this new project: I and a few others are starting. It got started because there have been an increasing number of calls for the deletion of articles on earlyish web sites (like, say,
483:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
487:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
412:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
357:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
138:
201:
132:
197:
480:
469:
211:
66:
311:
207:
437:
382:
433:
378:
315:
204:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
83:
267:
Is the person really wiki notable, apart from the trolling incident - in which case, ought not the incident be the article?
153:
120:
424:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
369:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
429:
374:
303:
259:
237:
27:
307:
189:
473:
91:
114:
73:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
188:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
110:
160:
425:
370:
327:
319:
146:
464:
448:
101:
78:
81:. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
401:
392:
346:
337:
290:
286:
272:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
227:
174:
74:
493:
421:
405:
366:
350:
420:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
365:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
126:
34:
417:
409:
362:
354:
323:
413:
358:
273:
218:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
70:
58:
255:
241:
223:
219:
170:
489:
87:
article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the
296:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
193:
23:
53:
497:
441:
386:
331:
231:
178:
42:
408:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge
353:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge
246:
462:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
314:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
192:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
279:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
145:
57:
Hello Rcade! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
468:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
65:of the articles that you created is tagged as an
400:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
345:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
184:Disambiguation link notification for December 5
159:
8:
481:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Susan Mernit
67:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person
285:notice, but please explain why in your
77:, all biographies should be based on
7:
470:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
274:deleted for any of several reasons
262:because of the following concern:
14:
479:The article will be discussed at
426:review the candidates' statements
371:review the candidates' statements
455:
52:
432:. For the Election committee,
402:Arbitration Committee election
393:ArbCom elections are now open!
377:. For the Election committee,
347:Arbitration Committee election
338:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
442:13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
387:13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
71:biographies of living persons
43:01:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
232:11:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
179:05:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
428:and submit your choices on
373:and submit your choices on
332:12:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
318:allows discussion to reach
299:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
282:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
513:
498:16:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
434:MediaWiki message delivery
379:MediaWiki message delivery
310:exist. In particular, the
190:David Lawrence (publisher)
97:tag. Here is the article:
304:proposed deletion process
28:Mirsky's Worst of the Web
472:or whether it should be
291:the article's talk page
251:
406:Arbitration Committee
351:Arbitration Committee
316:articles for deletion
260:proposed for deletion
250:
220:opt-out instructions
410:arbitration process
355:arbitration process
202:fix with Dab solver
422:arbitration policy
367:arbitration policy
308:deletion processes
252:
210:• Join us at the
61:alerting you that
238:Proposed deletion
215:
165:
48:Unreferenced BLPs
17:Early Web History
504:
459:
458:
301:
300:
284:
283:
249:
205:
198:check to confirm
164:
163:
149:
105:
96:
90:
79:reliable sources
56:
40:
37:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
460:
456:
453:
430:the voting page
396:
375:the voting page
341:
312:speedy deletion
298:
297:
281:
280:
247:
245:
212:DPL WikiProject
186:
106:
94:
92:unreferencedBLP
88:
50:
35:
32:
19:
12:
11:
5:
510:
508:
454:
452:
447:Nomination of
445:
399:
395:
390:
344:
340:
335:
322:for deletion.
302:will stop the
270:
269:
244:
235:
185:
182:
167:
166:
49:
46:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
500:
499:
495:
491:
485:
482:
477:
475:
471:
467:
466:
450:
446:
444:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
394:
391:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
339:
336:
334:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
294:
292:
288:
277:
275:
268:
265:
264:
263:
261:
257:
243:
239:
236:
234:
233:
229:
225:
221:
216:
213:
209:
203:
199:
195:
191:
183:
181:
180:
176:
172:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
144:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
112:
109:
108:Find sources:
103:
100:
99:
98:
93:
86:
85:
80:
76:
75:verifiability
72:
68:
64:
60:
55:
47:
45:
44:
41:
38:
29:
25:
16:
486:
478:
465:Susan Mernit
463:
461:
451:for deletion
449:Susan Mernit
397:
342:
306:, but other
295:
287:edit summary
278:
271:
266:
256:Kathy Sierra
254:The article
253:
242:Kathy Sierra
217:
187:
168:
156:
150:
142:
135:
129:
123:
117:
107:
102:Susan Mernit
82:
62:
51:
31:
20:
133:free images
418:topic bans
363:topic bans
222:. Thanks,
414:site bans
359:site bans
324:Mpjmcevoy
320:consensus
258:has been
206:Read the
194:Chantilly
169:Thanks!--
24:Seanbaby
474:deleted
224:DPL bot
171:DASHBot
139:WP refs
127:scholar
490:Boleyn
404:. The
349:. The
289:or on
111:Google
69:. The
36:rodii
154:JSTOR
115:books
494:talk
438:talk
383:talk
328:talk
228:talk
175:talk
147:FENS
121:news
398:Hi,
343:Hi,
240:of
208:FAQ
161:TWL
84:686
59:bot
26:or
496:)
476:.
440:)
416:,
385:)
361:,
330:)
293:.
276:.
230:)
200:|
177:)
141:)
104:-
95:}}
89:{{
39:·
33:·
492:(
436:(
381:(
326:(
226:(
214:.
196:(
173:(
157:·
151:·
143:·
136:·
130:·
124:·
118:·
113:(
63:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
