2072:, but I haven't updated the page since 2020 because most people external to Knowledge (XXG) do not use that page, and internally, other Wikipedians usually encounter our projects through our userpages. There is no Knowledge (XXG) policy that page discussion "must be done transparently on talk pages." However, if there are one or two other editors who also prefer that I give my student editors feedback on their projects on talk pages, I can make that change. Since you brought up sourcing at the Alcott page, Heidi reviewed some of the sources and found that there was some consensus that the Saxton biography focused unduly on the effect of Bronson's parenting on Alcott.
2050:? I looked there for BYU and found nothing. Perhaps consider setting this initiative up as a GLAM project, complete with GLAM page and a hub for transparent communication. As it happens, I am a subject expert, both at American poety, and Alcott. But I have limited time to devote to Knowledge (XXG), so will take a closer look regarding sources when/if time allows. Beyond that, however, from many long and candid discussions with students I have a good idea of how young people feel about editing here under certains conditions. The young people in question are placed in an untenable position.
792:
proceedings that I mentioned touches on this subject. One fascinating aspect of this is the somewhat unknown connection between pineapple production in the south and slavery. A week or so ago I raised this subject with an editor who specializes in this subject and even they hadnāt heard of it. Iām hoping the forthcoming conference publication will shed additional light on all of this as even I hadnāt heard of the connection to slavery before. Some of this is covered by an author named
Catherine Manegold, but itās hard to find info about her and her work.
2124:
happen on wiki, presumably you find yourself involved in discussions/arguments that your students are involved in because they come to you and say "Ma'am, could I have a minute? I'm in a discussion on this talk page..." and I think what
Victoria is trying to communicate (apologies if wrong) is that the dynamic created by off-wiki communication through an organizational hierarchy is offputting (it gives the impression of interacting with an entity of some kind, not two distinct people worth engaging with).
755:
All is not lost! They are releasing a major paper or book on the conference findings this year.) In any case, on the design motif front, there are at least four categories that made great use of the mofif: architecture, tableware, furniture, and the textile arts. In terms of the textile arts, needlework in the 19th century used pineapple crochet and lace designs. That's about all the info on the textile arts I have so far, but from what I understand there's a lot out there in archives. Thanks.
593:
interpretation of the BoM as sacred writ with NPOV? It seems like an introduction could be "Adherents in the Latter Day Saint movement and other Mormon studies scholars interpret this text based on the assumption that it was written by ." Then if there are other naturalistic interpretations, those would go in the same section. There aren't as many naturalistic interpretations, but I think there's a Dan Vogel book that tries to link events in the BoM to events in Joseph Smith's life.
363:
best thing to do would be to declare it. Also, one of the professors in the
English department at BYU, Paul Westover, is a Wordsworth scholar and he was cited on the Dorothy Wordsworth page before my student started working on it. We were going to ask him for advice on editing the page, but my student decided not to after realizing he was cited on the page. I think it's okay for us to consult with Paul Westover about the page--would you agree?
1268:. It appears that church membership is required to access them, but on the other hand, it feels like these are not materials that would be sacred or viewed as private to the Church. Do you have any suggestions on the way forward here. I'd also like to have a way that these would be acceptable references since I believe that it is acceptable to have to pay for references, having to be a member of an organization to access is problematic.
22:
164:
I knew of an additional external relationship to the subject, which I disclosed where I thought of them. I plan to add the connected contributor template to the other pages in the maintenance categories. Afterwards, I will see if I can generate lists from my previous students' contribution histories and add them to their appropriate pages. I probably won't finish until mid-May because of other obligations I need to attend to.
1987:
discussion you referenced. Some of the editors said that I have not been disclosing my role as a library employee clearly enough. In an effort to address those complaints, I have been trying to be clearer about my position by using the talkpage banners and making sure that mention my employment when I enter a conversation on the talk page. I do not have any more authority in the talkpage discussion than you or Heidi do.
1508:
1544:
725:, has been looking for possible sourcing relating to a pineapple design motif (this was apparently widely used until the late nineteenth century and online sources are lacking). Given your connections with BYU, I was wondering if maybe you had anything useful in your library? Obviously you don't have to do anything on my behalf, but I figured it'd be worth asking at the very least. Thanks,
1991:
soup kitchens, organize recreation for children and adults, take meals to senior citizens, provide hospice care, and help people to pay their taxes (among many other things). This volunteer labor is valuable, and is similar to labor that people are paid to do. The existence of a paid position that is similar to a volunteer's work does not negate the value of (your) volunteer labor.
2090:, which says "Because it is less transparent than on-wiki notifications, the use of email, IRC, Discord, or other off-wiki communication to notify editors is strongly discouraged unless there is a significant reason for not using talk page notifications." (there does not appear to be a signficant reason for this communication to take place off-wiki) We also have a policy
948:
who widen the end to the beginning of WWI, as virtually all the
British gardeners who were part of the hobbyist tradition and had the technical knowledge of growing pineapples in hothouses died on the battlefield. Donāt have the sources at the moment as Iām going from memory and Iām not at my desk but on my phone. Enjoy your Thursday and subsequent weekend.
1804:
1313:
1146:
1772:: "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." I know that normally, being a finalist isn't the same as receiving the award, but the National Book award is prestigious enough that it should be sufficient to establish notability. I can also add some of the criticism Zanahary listed.
588:
felt like they were outside the scope of my editing (like the general issues people have with paid editing, or with how to approach religious topics). Now that I have a little emotional distance, I think I can see one of the main problems people had with my team's work. A section like the interpretation section on
947:
was born. This is because pineapples were widely accessible and cheap enough for the public to buy, which made the upper class lose interest in the fruit as a status symbol. This also corresponded with the start of the pineapple canning industry in the 1860s. Although there are some other sources
791:
Thatās very kind of you. If youāre interested, thereās a secondary yet related topic that I havenāt even discussed that might also yield some results by way of intersection, but who knows. Apparently, the pineapple culture motif is found throughout the southern and northeastern US. The conference
691:
It's honestly ridiculous that others feel that all that conflict information needs to be disclosed. Knowledge (XXG) is an open platform and every person that edits comes at it from their own past experiences and associations. I find it very sad that some within the
Knowledge (XXG) community question
362:
internship, I realized that BYU as an institution has a relationship with
Wordsworth as an institution that goes beyond us having a Wordsworth collection in our special collections. No one at the Wordsworth Trust has asked us to edit Wordsworth pages--I doubt they even know my team exists. Maybe the
163:
An update on this--I've gone through the categories for 19th, 20th, and 21st century articles adding the connected contributor template using AWB. I tried to skip pages that already had a connected contributor template, but I may have duplicated information on some pages. There were four pages where
117:
when I created that page. I am not allowed to edit any page related to the LDS Church. This include pages for people who are members of the LDS Church. This includes participating in talk page discussions. I am allowed to disclose any further details about my COIs on pages I've edited. I am happy to
2138:
You kinda have it right, HEB, but more importantly how can I engage when there's additional discussion taking place that I don't know anything about? CITEVAR is a thing and I've spent considerable time teaching one of Rachel's (paid) students how to resolve errors via script only to have discussion
1990:
You've mentioned feeling that paid editors and volunteers cannot work together because of the shift in dynamic. I believe that there is a lot of work that volunteers do that is worth paying someone to do. Volunteers in my state tutor children in how to read, shelve books in libraries, serve food in
1478:
Ah, I see. I agree with the idea to make it a taskforce within
Wikiproject Anthropology instead of its own Wikiproject. I'm happy to help other editors find sources. I am not able to edit Mormon folklore-related pages right now because of my topic ban, but there could be some related pages that are
754:
at the
University of Cambridge. That link has a list of most of the researchers whose work appears cited in the article. It was a great conference (I only listened to the audio online), but apparently they didn't have enough funding to record and upload the video, which is quite a shame. (Update:
587:
thank you *smiling tear emoji*. Your comment means a lot to me. Whenever I see your name in a page history, I know that page is in good hands. I wish that I had been able to communicate better with people who were criticizing my work, but I felt overwhelmed by the volume of criticisms. Many of them
398:
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. One and two seem to be covered by the AN thread. I don't see an objection to you adding COI notices. As for number three, I would seek clarification at AN, as that is right at the edges of related to the LDS Church, broadly construed. As far as consulting
192:
I'm in the process of adding my student editors to the paid templates I mass-added. I just wanted to note here for future reference that I have not added the paid template to pages where we simply added a small amount of information, a link, or a category. Some examples: Gandhi added works lists to
1994:
I have been giving my student editors advice on editing. They are still responsible for their own editing, of course, but I try to head off issues when I see them. Since the ANI discussion, I have been trying to prioritize reviewing my students' work. Some editors see the editing my students do as
571:
I was pretty shocked to see the recent total ban. It seems extremely heavy handed, the conversation was downright rude at points, and discounts the actual edits you have made, the VAST majority of which have been good. FWIW, thanks for the work you have done in the LDS space. Even though we didn't
450:
One further question: Does this ban extend to making edit requests on talk pages of article with COI topics? Although these editors clearly have a COI, that's what edit requests are for, to provide a way for COI editors to have their suggested contributions reviewed by the community. It just seems
257:
The tags don't go on articles themselves, and they'd only be on article talk pages related to BYU/LDS, and I agree with Rachel that where minor edits were made that didn't change content, or ones where there's no connection to BYU/LDS, they wouldn't even be needed there. And these tags aren't even
1986:
Hi
Victoria, thank you for telling me about your concerns. I'm sorry that my participation in the conversation about editing the Alcott page created such a change in dynamic for you to the extent that you no longer wish to share your advice. The reason I led out with my role is because of the ANI
592:
summarizes sources that assume that Omni actually wrote the book (many other pages about sacred writ and about literature on
Knowledge (XXG) assume the same thing (that the purported/presented authorship is accurate, or at least worthy of textual analysis)). Is there a way to reconcile presenting
2123:
Personally I would expect only specific feedback which could reasonably influence a specific edit (for example suggesting a change to the article's categorization) to be made on-wiki, general feedback about editing and performance is absolutely OK to do in private. The "fetch" if you will should
927:
Thank you for your kind words. I asked about the image over at the helpdesk. I'm thinking that if we can get enough information about the pineapple as a design motif, we could create a sub-section for it (to distinguish between discussion of the pineapple as classy entertainment). Do we have any
350:
2. I have a few potential COIs that I believe are worth declaring (external relationships with subjects I've written about). However, all the people involved in them are Mormon. How would you like me to proceed? I could declare them in a section here (but would that be violating the TBAN?). Or I
995:
Oh, I forgot to mention: there's a Hawaiian quilting class I want to take, but it's only taught on Oahu. There's been some really interesting articles about it. Given that I have arthritis, it's probably not a good idea for me to do it. I can barely type as it is. I've looked into using voice
942:
I put the scope in the lead and I think I sourced it elsewhere. It lasted approximately 150 years, from the early 18th century, after the Dutch methods of growing it caught on in Britain and the rest of Europe (hothouses throughout the region, but also including Russia) to the mid-to-late-19th
258:
all that visible at article talk; most casual editors aren't reading the talk headers. So it's not calling it out to readers and not even to the vast majority of casual editors. Mostly it's just an FYI to other highly-engaged editors: this page has been edited by someone who has declared a COI.
1953:
there are some sort of sanctions in place. I've taught Alcott and am quite familiar with the topic and there are two concerns. One is the issue of name that I pointed out. I noticed it because the mother, Abigail Alcott, is being referred to by a nickname, which we don't do. I mentioned a good
1062:
oh, nice find. I put in a request for that book. One of my neighbors showed me a photo of her pineapple quilt, which was a modern design (not the variant of the log cabin design I was looking for). She offered to let me use the photo, but I was unsure of the copyright. Do you know of any other
2045:
fall under the umbrella of "heading off issues". If so, then that should have happened on the talk page, so that editors who interact with your (paid) students understand that there is another person who is telling them how to proceed. Assigning projects isn't really the Knowledge (XXG) way:
1958:
family, and we need to make sure her work is presented neutrally. I've not yet had a chance to look closely at the sources and because I'm retired, living in the country, have some difficulty getting sources, but from a few glances something made me concerned. So I'm bringing this to you for
413:
Sorry to butt in here, I was reading through this talk page and was surprised to see the topic ban notice at the end. Please clarify, does this also apply to editing by proxy? That is, does the ban also apply to the student employees hired by this editor to edit LDS-related articles?
1461:, focussed on cleaning up/improving, expanding, and creating articles involving oral tradition. So far I've got around 12 definites plus 5 interested but busy. I'm still asking people so we haven't had a discussion about the scope and objectives yet. You can see the proposal at
692:
whether you can summarize information critical of the Church of Jesus Christ, when many of those critics fail to disclose their conflicts of interest and personal biases. Unfortunately, I am not surprised that this is happening, but sad to see it is being institutionalized. --
1966:
community, but unfortunately that puts her in an uncomfortable position, and therefore I need to step away. Which is unfortunate - she has the makings of a Wikipedians and I miss teaching and would have been happy to mentor. As I would have been happy to mentor Noah on
824:
I just had to chance to review it; not much there, some I can use for architectural motif material, but nothing about textiles. I think there are supplementary materials by Manegold that say a bit more, as it looks like the book was used to teach a course at Princeton.
1063:
instances of handicrafts from modern patterns being used on Wikimedia Commons? In the past I have said that they don't quality for copyright as a use-object if there are multiple for sale at a craft fair. But a quilt made from a pattern is very different from that.
1081:
category now, and I see a lot of modern design motifs that were uploaded, but it isn't all that clear if they entered the public domain. Many others were donated by museums. I see a Dresden Plate motif, but it's possible this is now copyright-free, I don't know.
1998:
I was and am grateful to you for your advice on the Alcott page. I agree that we should refer to Louisa's mother by her given name and not her nickname. Are there certain sources we should not be using, or should use with caution? I am not a subject
750:, which is terribly incomplete at the moment. I won't be getting to this until at least early or mid-June so there's no hurry at all. Just so you know, many of the relevant researchers in this field spoke at the 2020, interdisciplinary conference
346:
1. I am not allowed to add COI templates to the talk pages of pages I have edited in the past. Therefore I will be stopping my little project, mentioned above, to do so. I also cannot request that another user add them on the AWB project request
2143:, and honestly I feel bad for the student because they have to engage with me as a community member and additionally engage with their boss. Either way, I'm seeing issues that need to be resolved and talk pages are where we resolve issues, no?
967:. Quilting is very popular here, so I may be able to get sources for images of quilts with those patterns. I'm thinking of creating a page for the Log Cabin pattern, which is very popular, and could include variations like the pineapple one.
343:. I have some questions about the extent of the ban. Are you the right person to ask? Other editors have informed me that topic bans apply to all pages, including sandbox pages and talk pages. This is what I understand about the ban so far:
201:
for the location of shooting, and Katelyn and I added links to findingaids to many pages that we did not otherwise edit extensively. We also added links to musical works that the BYU Library uploaded to archive.org on some relevant pages.
1902:
Rachel you write that you had no intention of silencing me, but when a post begins with the words "Hi, I'm Heidi's supervisor at the BYU Library", the editing dynamic is irrecovably shifted from editors who donate time and those who are
877:
was useful for leads too. The pineapple plate image I took from a website selling antiques, and I'm not sure if the photographer retains the copyright (since a plate is almost? two-dimensional?). We can delete it if I've made a mistake.
529:
Okay. That seems like a nonsensical position to take, however, given that "both sides have equal footing in policy" in the closing statement. So be it. In any case it's up to Rachel Helps to appeal. Thanks for the clarification.
2094:
which comes into play vis-a-vis self direction "Sanctions have been applied to editors of longer standing who have not, in the opinion of Knowledge (XXG)'s administrative bodies, consistently exercised independent judgment."
2030:
While organizationally you might be responsible for that student's edits, from a Knowledge (XXG) perspective, they're responsible for their own edits including being aware of the guidelines and policies that apply to
1928:
While organizationally you might be responsible for that student's edits, from a Knowledge (XXG) perspective, they're responsible for their own edits including being aware of the guidelines and policies that apply to
962:
Thank you! The other ILL book I ordered came in. It had a bit about the pineapple motif in East Asian sources, which I didn't include. I was surprised to find that there aren't very many Knowledge (XXG) pages for
777:(already cited on the page) has a nice section on the trend though, so I can add that when I come back from my conference next week. I'm going to email our subject librarian and see if she can help too.
1834:
1339:
1176:
106:
1681:
611:. But best to refrain from discussing such things until after you get the topic ban repealed. (Even discussion of LDS topics here on your talk page can be a violation of your ban.)
272:
I think I put COI tags on all of the pages I and my team have edited significantly. I did not limit it to just BYU/LDS pages; I included pages under all the topics we've worked on.
1995:
editing by proxy, because I give them assignments of pages to work on (sometimes just a topic; sometimes a specific page). That is why my topic ban also applies to my students.
1679:! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
1601:
Appears very likely to be notable - to show it, please provide some more independent sources about her or her work. Scholarly work on her poetry, professional reviews, etc.
1594:
1168:
773:
It would be my pleasure to help! This is a difficult subject to find sources on. I poked around in some of our interior design encyclopedias but I didn't find anything--
2046:
generally editors find something they want to write about or some way to volunteer here that fits their skills and do so without outside supervision. Are you aware of
354:
3. I have OCD and it is difficult for me to think of any page that is not, somehow, related to Mormonism. For instance, one of my students is working on the page for
1954:
solution, and honestly, you should let Heidi make her own editorial judgment. Beyond, that I'm a bit concerned about some of the sources. As you know Alcott's was a
1916:
you and your colleagues are here as paid editors. You're not here as volunteers who managed to find a way to be paid while continuing to do work for Knowledge (XXG)
1625:
1603:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
644:
I personally see that as right on the line. And I think the best path toward getting a topic ban removed includes staying as far away from the line as you can.
1669:
981:
Sounds fruitful.Ā :-). I am currently finishing up the O'Keeffe Hawaii series article, which Iām way behind on, but after that I will focus on pineapple mania.
1152:
1137:
964:
943:
century, before pineapples were widely accessible through shipping and manufacturing. So more accurately, pineapple mania was said to end right around when
216:
Buttinsky here again...I wonder if, now that things have calmed down a bit, it might be worth having a more focused community discussion about whether we
118:
assist with research and discuss what I know of Mormon studies off-wiki. Feel free to email me from the "Email this user" link under the "User" dropdown.
2064:
The subjects I discuss with my students include source evaluation, interactions with other editors, adherence to encyclopedic style, etc. We are on the
928:
definitions for the scope of "pineapple mania"? Is it limited to Europe, or does it include the American interest in pineapples associated with Hawaii?
1338:. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions ā kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the
1252:
I know this is slightly different than normal requests, but I know you are a member of the Church. In looking for information on the LDS related GLOs (
1010:
I met a textile historian at a conference I went to last week, so I'm hoping she can help me with sources! Thanks for the tip about Hawaiian quilting.
1512:
2139:
fizzle and that page now may or may not have a full conversion - which isn't needed if the student has left. I've just left suggestions re issues on
2002:
I believe you are an experienced editor, and that I and my students could learn a lot from you. We will continue to learn from your work on FAs like
1618:
109:
because I did not sufficiently disclose my external relationships in my personal editing. Specifically, I did not disclose that I am friends with
2069:
1265:
702:
Just read some more stuff - indefinitely topic banned from LDS related topics - so sad. Thanks for the work you have done and continue to do. --
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
1462:
2133:
2104:
869:
along with some images (some that I found by searching Commons, some with leads from the book). I'm sad that I can't think of a way to get
1727:
1817:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
1326:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
1159:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
1769:
243:
behavioral guideline: "you should make the disclosure on your user page, on affected talk pages, and whenever you discuss the topic".
1866:
1845:
1791:
1550:
1531:
1371:
1350:
1300:
1208:
1187:
1133:
1574:
1937:
I've been giving Heidi editorial advice behind the scenes, and you identified some issues that we should address (which I missed).
1283:
Hi, because of my topic ban, I am not permitted to discuss this on Knowledge (XXG). Please email me and I can discuss it further.
630:
Sorry, I thought that discussing the events that led to my ban would be okay and under the umbrella of discussing the ban itself.
1830:
1645:
1586:
1581:
1172:
2109:
Hi HEB, can I take your comment to indicate that you would also prefer that I give my students editing feedback on talk pages?
1971:. But I cannot mentor as an experienced editor normally would if there's another editor in the mix. I'm sad this has happened.
1261:
520:
438:
404:
329:
1862:
1841:
1695:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
1367:
1346:
1204:
1183:
1590:
126:
Hi, I'm putting this on my talk page just in case other users who are watching this page are interested in this discussion. @
1950:
718:
1935:. Yet, it appears that in fact your employees are turning to you for advice, or you are providing advice, per this comment
737:
1335:
1568:
1257:
2129:
2100:
2034:
1932:
1919:
1911:
194:
607:"I think there's a Dan Vogel book that tries to link events in the BoM to events in Joseph Smith's life." There is.
1401:
516:
496:
447:
Thanks. Perhaps the four currently-employed students listed on the user page should receive topic ban notices also.
434:
400:
340:
325:
193:
many German authors as part of our Sophie database, JAGrace, myself, and other student editors added many pages to
1597:
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).
1458:
76:
1319:
1304:
381:
1266:
https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/record/c3269069-3991-42ec-943b-2300825586c4/0?view=browse&lang=eng
2148:
2110:
2073:
2055:
2007:
1976:
1946:
1861:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
1773:
1715:
1553:
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
1480:
1444:
1366:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
1284:
1242:
1203:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
1064:
1011:
968:
929:
879:
852:
778:
664:
631:
594:
468:
385:
367:
273:
244:
203:
165:
135:
110:
1556:
2140:
2125:
2096:
1720:
2152:
2118:
1042:
will be published. In the process of looking, I did discover one additional source that I forgot about:
1734:
1391:
536:
505:
457:
420:
1691:
746:
is going above and beyond trying to help me, so I must thank them. Rachel, this concerns the article
430:
851:
but it looks like it's mostly about cultivation. I should be able to review the book later this week.
1888:
1748:
1700:
1655:
905:
734:
2087:
1469:
1433:
1087:
1053:
1029:
1001:
986:
953:
918:
830:
815:
797:
760:
703:
693:
2144:
2051:
1972:
1829:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
1520:
1171:. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they
577:
355:
291:
263:
183:
154:
131:
82:
807:
143:
481:
I don't see why it would. That's the whole point of edit requests after all. Specifically, the
1589:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
874:
652:
619:
485:
228:
2091:
2065:
2047:
1955:
1611:
1535:
1273:
531:
500:
452:
415:
359:
78:
21:
240:
2042:
1968:
1884:
1826:
1696:
1651:
1421:
1253:
897:
747:
743:
726:
839:
Our subject librarian acknowledged that the available material is sparse and recommended
1617:
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
2025:
1923:
1874:
1465:
1429:
1425:
1379:
1235:
1216:
1083:
1049:
1025:
997:
982:
949:
914:
826:
811:
793:
756:
722:
384:, I'm going to post at AN asking if it's okay if I post the COI notices on talk pages.
324:, you are indefinitely topic banned from LDS Church-related topics, broadly construed.
1907:
1757:
1516:
573:
399:
with someone with a clear COI on the topic, it depends on what "consult with" means.
287:
259:
179:
150:
127:
114:
2081:
2059:
2015:
1980:
1892:
1781:
1763:
1704:
1659:
1524:
1488:
1473:
1452:
1437:
1410:
1292:
1277:
1091:
1072:
1057:
1033:
1019:
1005:
990:
976:
957:
937:
922:
908:
887:
860:
834:
819:
801:
786:
764:
706:
696:
672:
658:
647:
639:
625:
614:
602:
589:
581:
541:
524:
510:
495:
for COI editors to use on talk pages. If I were you, I'd ask for clarification, as
476:
462:
442:
425:
408:
393:
375:
333:
295:
286:
For me, that's going above and beyond and would make me support lifting the t-ban.
281:
267:
252:
234:
223:
211:
187:
173:
158:
80:
1668:
1264:), I noticed that there is a lot on them (including Pledge Manuals) in areas like
843:
by Claudia Hyles, which I've ordered via inter-library loan (ILL). She also found
870:
1269:
572:
always agree, it is absolutely in a better place because of what you have done.
1543:
1046:
2003:
1810:
1795:
1024:
I would love to hear more about this. I am always in the mood to learn more.
944:
848:
1942:, which seems to contravene advice a community member provided in good faith.
1048:. Let me know if you get a chance to look at it. I don't have access to it.
841:
And the Answer is a Pineapple: The King of Fruit in Folklore, Fabric and Food
663:
Good idea. Epachamo, feel free to email me if you'd like to discuss further.
239:
I don't think anyone was opposed to it. It would help our editing conform to
1962:
Personally I'd prefer if you let Heidi work directly with me as a member of
1840:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
1345:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
1228:
1182:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
913:
Looks wonderful, Rachel. You are a Knowledge (XXG) treasure, a rare jewel.
844:
2041:
must be done transparently on talk pages. Do the threads where I posted on
1039:
892:
If you're unsure about a file you've uploaded to commons, I've found their
751:
366:
I have other questions, but these three seem the most temporally relevant.
107:
have been banned from editing LDS Church-related content on Knowledge (XXG)
358:. But yesterday, when one of my classmates mentioned participating in the
1844:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
1741:
1349:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
1186:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
113:
when I created that page, nor did I disclose that I have contributed to
1689:
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
1515:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1803:
1312:
1145:
752:"Power, Promise, Politics: The Pineapple from Columbus to Del Monte"
1873:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
1378:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
1215:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
893:
1813:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
1322:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
1155:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
1078:
717:
Hi Rachel. I noticed that you're also listed as a member over at
1610:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
1248:
Requesting access to catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org materials?
1768:
Hi, being a finalist for the national book award fulfills the
1646:
Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors
1131:
122:
COI template disclosure on talk pages of pages we've worked on
83:
15:
1628:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
1802:
1542:
1311:
1144:
433:
covers this. In short, yes, it applies to editing by proxy.
220:
want to make you spread COI tags all over Knowledge (XXG).
2006:
whether or not you choose to interact with us personally.
1563:
coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in
1555:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
130:, my student just added the paid contribution template to
1851:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
1356:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
1193:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
810:. It looks like I bookmarked it a month ago and forgot.
1939:
1875:
1854:
1718:! I found some sources to establish Mazur's notability:
1638:
1630:
1463:
Knowledge (XXG) talk: WikiProject Council#New proposals
1380:
1359:
1217:
1196:
1044:
Feast & Fast: The Art of Food in Europe, 1500 -1800
451:
wrong if the topic ban also extends to edit requests. ~
321:
92:
713:
Any chance you'd be willing to help me with something?
1614:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
1479:
within my institution's scope for my team's editing.
712:
467:
I assume that the ban also applies to edit requests.
1624:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
2028:'s (with apologies for repeated pings) statement:
996:typing software but I've never really pursued it.
1833:over time. You may like to take a look at the
1175:over time. You may like to take a look at the
896:to be a useful place to go and ask questions.
8:
1898:Paid editing on American literature articles
1424:, would you be interested in a taskforce on
1513:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard
1153:Oliver Optic's Magazine: Our Boys and Girls
1138:Oliver Optic's Magazine: Our Boys and Girls
2070:Knowledge (XXG):GLAM/Harold_B._Lee_Library
1723:Contemporary Authors: New Revision Series
2039:I try to head off issues when I see them
1837:to see how you can improve the article.
1342:to see how you can improve the article.
1179:to see how you can improve the article.
1038:I'm still trying to figure out when the
101:Notice to all users: my topic ban (TBAN)
1557:qualifies for a Knowledge (XXG) article
178:No deadlines, progress is always good!
2038:
2029:
1936:
1927:
1915:
1587:guidelines on the notability of people
1420:Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to
609:Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet
515:Edit requests violate the topic ban.
7:
965:North American pieced quilt patterns
1599:The comment the reviewer left was:
1511:There is currently a discussion at
1721:This entry from Gale Literature's
1549:Your recent article submission to
14:
1882:Thanks again, and happy editing!
1821:The article has been assessed as
1770:notability criteria for academics
1387:Thanks again, and happy editing!
1330:The article has been assessed as
1224:Thanks again, and happy editing!
1163:The article has been assessed as
1040:book for the pineapple conference
719:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Craft
567:Thanks for the work you have done
1667:
1506:
1502:Notice of noticeboard discussion
134:. Is that what you had in mind?
20:
1682:Articles for creation help desk
1632:Articles for creation help desk
339:Thank you for letting me know,
865:I added some information from
149:Yes, exactly, thanks, Rachel!
1:
1865:without posting a request to
1605:after they have been resolved
1443:Sure, I'd like to know more.
1370:without posting a request to
1207:without posting a request to
2068:page under our formal name,
1825:, which is recorded on its
1559:āthat is, they do not show
1334:, which is recorded on its
1167:, which is recorded on its
867:Pineapple: A Global History
199:When Hollywood Came to Town
195:Category:Films shot in Utah
2181:
871:this piece by Andrew Moore
849:"A Noble Present of Fruit"
463:20:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
443:17:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
426:17:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
409:13:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
394:15:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
376:15:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
334:12:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
188:18:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
174:16:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
159:14:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
144:21:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
121:
2153:19:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2134:18:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2119:18:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2105:18:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2082:16:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2060:14:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2016:17:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
1981:21:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
1949:opened this spring at AN
1893:19:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
1782:15:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
1764:06:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
1705:18:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1660:18:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1525:01:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1489:20:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
1474:20:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
1453:20:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
1438:20:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
1092:19:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
1073:19:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
1058:19:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
1034:19:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
1020:14:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
1006:01:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
991:21:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
977:21:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
197:while citing Jim D'Arc's
2114:
2077:
2011:
1945:According to the thread
1876:leaving us some feedback
1863:create articles yourself
1842:create articles yourself
1777:
1585:of the subject (see the
1484:
1448:
1411:21:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
1381:leaving us some feedback
1368:create articles yourself
1347:create articles yourself
1320:Log cabin quilting block
1305:Log cabin quilting block
1293:15:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
1288:
1278:14:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
1243:20:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
1218:leaving us some feedback
1205:create articles yourself
1184:create articles yourself
1068:
1015:
972:
958:21:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
938:17:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
933:
923:22:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
909:21:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
888:21:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
883:
861:17:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
856:
835:20:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
820:15:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
802:09:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
787:22:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
782:
765:09:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
738:14:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
668:
635:
598:
472:
389:
371:
296:21:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
282:19:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
277:
268:13:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
248:
207:
169:
139:
1457:It'd be a taskforce on
707:21:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
697:21:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
673:19:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
659:18:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
640:18:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
626:18:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
603:16:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
582:14:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
542:03:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
525:20:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
511:20:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
499:also suggested above. ~
477:17:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
253:20:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
235:20:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
212:20:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
111:Michael Austin (writer)
2141:Talk:Louisa May Alcott
1807:
1547:
1316:
1149:
94:Edit with VisualEditor
2086:We have a guideline,
1910:opened late in 2020,
1867:Articles for creation
1846:Articles for creation
1806:
1792:Articles for creation
1551:Articles for Creation
1546:
1532:Articles for creation
1372:Articles for creation
1351:Articles for creation
1315:
1301:Articles for creation
1209:Articles for creation
1188:Articles for creation
1148:
1134:Articles for creation
517:ScottishFinnishRadish
497:ScottishFinnishRadish
435:ScottishFinnishRadish
401:ScottishFinnishRadish
341:ScottishFinnishRadish
326:ScottishFinnishRadish
2066:Knowledge (XXG):GLAM
2048:Knowledge (XXG):GLAM
1640:reviewer's talk page
721:. An editor I know,
351:could email someone.
1790:Your submission at
1530:Your submission at
1299:Your submission at
1132:Your submission at
1077:I'm looking at the
322:this ANI discussion
2111:Rachel Helps (BYU)
2074:Rachel Helps (BYU)
2008:Rachel Helps (BYU)
1947:AirshipJungleman29
1914:, SarahSV writes,
1808:
1774:Rachel Helps (BYU)
1751:Zeppo's First Wife
1716:Rachel Helps (BYU)
1685:. If you have any
1677:Rachel Helps (BYU)
1548:
1481:Rachel Helps (BYU)
1445:Rachel Helps (BYU)
1317:
1285:Rachel Helps (BYU)
1262:Lambda Delta Sigma
1150:
1065:Rachel Helps (BYU)
1012:Rachel Helps (BYU)
969:Rachel Helps (BYU)
930:Rachel Helps (BYU)
880:Rachel Helps (BYU)
853:Rachel Helps (BYU)
779:Rachel Helps (BYU)
665:Rachel Helps (BYU)
632:Rachel Helps (BYU)
595:Rachel Helps (BYU)
469:Rachel Helps (BYU)
386:Rachel Helps (BYU)
368:Rachel Helps (BYU)
356:Dorothy Wordsworth
274:Rachel Helps (BYU)
245:Rachel Helps (BYU)
204:Rachel Helps (BYU)
166:Rachel Helps (BYU)
136:Rachel Helps (BYU)
132:Talk:L. P. Hartley
1956:transcendentalist
1798:has been accepted
1711:
1710:
1626:untoward behavior
1595:mistakes to avoid
1579:sources that are
1409:
1307:has been accepted
1240:
1140:has been accepted
775:Pineapple Culture
656:
623:
540:
509:
461:
424:
232:
89:
88:
2172:
2126:Horse Eye's Back
2097:Horse Eye's Back
1878:
1870:
1857:
1762:
1756:
1671:
1664:
1663:
1643:
1635:
1612:Draft:Gail Mazur
1593:and learn about
1510:
1509:
1406:
1399:
1398:
1396:
1394:TechnoSquirrel69
1383:
1375:
1362:
1241:
1238:
1234:
1231:
1220:
1212:
1199:
903:
900:
808:one of the books
732:
729:
687:COI - Ridiculous
657:
650:
624:
617:
534:
503:
490:
484:
455:
418:
360:Wordsworth trust
233:
226:
97:
95:
84:
24:
16:
2180:
2179:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2043:American poetry
2037:. Stating that
1969:American poetry
1900:
1895:
1860:
1853:
1849:
1800:
1760:
1754:
1749:This review of
1742:This review of
1735:This review of
1728:This review of
1707:
1662:
1637:
1629:
1602:
1598:
1540:
1507:
1504:
1459:WP:Anthropology
1422:Mormon folklore
1418:
1413:
1402:
1392:
1389:
1365:
1358:
1354:
1309:
1258:Delta Phi Kappa
1254:Sigma Gamma Chi
1250:
1245:
1236:
1229:
1226:
1202:
1195:
1191:
1142:
901:
898:
847:. I also found
748:pineapple mania
730:
727:
715:
689:
645:
612:
569:
488:
482:
318:
221:
124:
103:
93:
91:
85:
79:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2178:
2176:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2019:
2018:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1906:In the thread
1899:
1896:
1848:if you prefer.
1839:
1835:grading scheme
1818:
1815:
1801:
1799:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1747:
1740:
1737:Forbidden City
1733:
1726:
1719:
1709:
1708:
1674:
1672:
1650:
1649:
1622:
1619:may be deleted
1615:
1600:
1591:technical help
1554:
1541:
1539:
1528:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1426:oral tradition
1417:
1414:
1353:if you prefer.
1344:
1340:grading scheme
1327:
1324:
1310:
1308:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1249:
1246:
1190:if you prefer.
1181:
1177:grading scheme
1160:
1157:
1143:
1141:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
911:
875:This blog post
768:
767:
714:
711:
710:
709:
688:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
568:
565:
563:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
448:
396:
380:Per advice on
364:
352:
348:
344:
317:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
255:
123:
120:
102:
99:
87:
86:
81:
77:
75:
72:
71:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2177:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2027:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1965:
1960:
1957:
1952:
1948:
1943:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1904:
1897:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1883:
1880:
1877:
1871:
1868:
1864:
1858:
1856:
1847:
1843:
1838:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1819:
1814:
1812:
1805:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1759:
1753:
1752:
1746:
1745:
1739:
1738:
1732:
1731:
1725:
1724:
1717:
1713:
1712:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1693:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1678:
1673:
1670:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1647:
1642:
1641:
1634:
1633:
1627:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1606:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1583:
1578:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1552:
1545:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1527:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1501:
1499:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1415:
1412:
1407:
1405:
1397:
1395:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1376:
1373:
1369:
1363:
1361:
1352:
1348:
1343:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1321:
1314:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1247:
1244:
1239:
1233:
1232:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1200:
1198:
1189:
1185:
1180:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1154:
1147:
1139:
1135:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1003:
999:
994:
993:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
966:
961:
960:
959:
955:
951:
946:
941:
940:
939:
935:
931:
926:
925:
924:
920:
916:
912:
910:
907:
904:
895:
891:
890:
889:
885:
881:
876:
872:
868:
864:
863:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
837:
836:
832:
828:
823:
822:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
790:
789:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
771:
770:
769:
766:
762:
758:
753:
749:
745:
742:
741:
740:
739:
736:
733:
724:
720:
708:
705:
701:
700:
699:
698:
695:
686:
674:
670:
666:
662:
661:
660:
654:
649:
643:
642:
641:
637:
633:
629:
628:
627:
621:
616:
610:
606:
605:
604:
600:
596:
591:
586:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
566:
564:
543:
538:
533:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
514:
513:
512:
507:
502:
498:
494:
487:
480:
479:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:
459:
454:
449:
446:
445:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
427:
422:
417:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
338:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
315:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
256:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
236:
230:
225:
219:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
200:
196:
191:
190:
189:
185:
181:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
162:
161:
160:
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
119:
116:
115:The ARCH-HIVE
112:
108:
100:
98:
96:
74:
73:
70:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
1963:
1961:
1944:
1926:reminds you
1905:
1901:
1881:
1872:
1852:
1850:
1822:
1820:
1816:
1809:
1750:
1743:
1736:
1729:
1722:
1690:
1686:
1680:
1676:
1639:
1631:
1604:
1580:
1575:
1569:
1564:
1560:
1505:
1497:
1419:
1403:
1393:
1386:
1377:
1357:
1355:
1331:
1329:
1325:
1318:
1251:
1227:
1223:
1214:
1194:
1192:
1164:
1162:
1158:
1151:
1043:
873:on Commons.
866:
845:this article
840:
774:
716:
690:
608:
590:Book of Omni
570:
562:
492:
319:
217:
198:
125:
104:
90:
34:
26:
1823:Start-Class
1582:independent
1561:significant
1416:Wikiproject
532:Anachronist
501:Anachronist
453:Anachronist
431:WP:PROXYING
416:Anachronist
2088:WP:STEALTH
2024:Repeating
2004:Ezra Pound
1885:asilvering
1811:Gail Mazur
1796:Gail Mazur
1744:The Common
1730:Land's End
1697:asilvering
1652:asilvering
1536:Gail Mazur
1165:Stub-Class
945:James Dole
899:Clovermoss
744:Clovermoss
728:Clovermoss
2026:Barkeep49
1924:Barkeep49
1855:help desk
1827:talk page
1636:, on the
1576:secondary
1565:published
1538:(July 27)
1466:Kowal2701
1430:Kowal2701
1360:help desk
1336:talk page
1197:help desk
1169:talk page
1084:Viriditas
1050:Viriditas
1026:Viriditas
998:Viriditas
983:Viriditas
950:Viriditas
915:Viriditas
894:help desk
827:Viriditas
812:Viriditas
794:Viriditas
757:Viriditas
723:Viriditas
316:Topic ban
2145:Victoria
2052:Victoria
1973:Victoria
1908:Valereee
1758:Zanahary
1692:Teahouse
1570:reliable
1517:Epachamo
806:I found
574:Epachamo
493:intended
486:edit COI
288:Valereee
260:Valereee
180:Valereee
151:Valereee
128:Valereee
27:Archives
2092:WP:MEAT
1999:expert.
1831:develop
1675:Hello,
1644:or use
1332:C-Class
1173:develop
648:Awilley
615:Awilley
491:tag is
224:Awilley
1270:Naraht
1237:(talk)
1079:Quilts
906:(talk)
735:(talk)
704:Trƶdel
694:Trƶdel
241:WP:COI
218:really
1903:paid.
1687:other
347:page.
2130:talk
2115:talk
2101:talk
2078:talk
2035:link
2031:them
2012:talk
1964:this
1959:now.
1951:link
1940:link
1933:link
1929:them
1922:and
1920:link
1912:link
1889:talk
1778:talk
1714:Hi @
1701:talk
1656:talk
1521:talk
1485:talk
1470:talk
1449:talk
1434:talk
1404:sigh
1289:talk
1274:talk
1230:Qcne
1088:talk
1069:talk
1054:talk
1030:talk
1016:talk
1002:talk
987:talk
973:talk
954:talk
934:talk
919:talk
884:talk
857:talk
831:talk
816:talk
798:talk
783:talk
761:talk
669:talk
653:talk
636:talk
620:talk
599:talk
578:talk
537:talk
521:talk
506:talk
473:talk
458:talk
439:talk
421:talk
405:talk
390:talk
372:talk
330:talk
320:Per
292:talk
278:talk
264:talk
249:talk
229:talk
208:talk
184:talk
170:talk
155:talk
140:talk
382:WPO
2151:)
2149:tk
2132:)
2117:)
2103:)
2080:)
2058:)
2056:tk
2033:,
2014:)
1979:)
1977:tk
1931:,
1918:,
1891:)
1879:.
1794::
1780:)
1703:)
1658:)
1607:.
1573:,
1567:,
1534::
1523:)
1487:)
1472:)
1451:)
1436:)
1428:?
1384:.
1303::
1291:)
1276:)
1260:,
1256:,
1221:.
1136::
1090:)
1071:)
1056:)
1032:)
1018:)
1004:)
989:)
975:)
956:)
936:)
921:)
902:š
886:)
859:)
833:)
818:)
800:)
785:)
763:)
731:š
671:)
638:)
601:)
580:)
523:)
489:}}
483:{{
475:)
441:)
407:)
392:)
374:)
332:)
294:)
280:)
266:)
251:)
210:)
186:)
172:)
157:)
142:)
105:I
66:,
62:,
58:,
54:,
50:,
46:,
42:,
38:,
2147:(
2128:(
2113:(
2099:(
2076:(
2054:(
2010:(
1975:(
1887:(
1869:.
1859:.
1776:(
1761:ź§
1755:ź§
1699:(
1654:(
1648:.
1621:.
1519:(
1483:(
1468:(
1447:(
1432:(
1408:)
1400:(
1390:ā
1374:.
1364:.
1287:(
1272:(
1211:.
1201:.
1086:(
1067:(
1052:(
1028:(
1014:(
1000:(
985:(
971:(
952:(
932:(
917:(
882:(
855:(
829:(
814:(
796:(
781:(
759:(
667:(
655:)
651:(
646:~
634:(
622:)
618:(
613:~
597:(
576:(
539:)
535:(
530:~
519:(
508:)
504:(
471:(
460:)
456:(
437:(
423:)
419:(
414:~
403:(
388:(
370:(
328:(
290:(
276:(
262:(
247:(
231:)
227:(
222:~
206:(
182:(
168:(
153:(
138:(
68:9
64:8
60:7
56:6
52:5
48:4
44:3
40:2
36:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
