Knowledge

User talk:Raddman26

Source 📝

184: 115: 288:
It strains credibility to ask us to imagine that you created your account, to bee-line to the exact same page as a user who had just been blocked, to start making the exact same arguments, all entirely by coincidence. (I am also unsure on what criteria you are asserting you have been discriminated
323:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
22: 224: 41: 308: 160: 44:. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of 269:
Nope, not sock puppet'ing. Check my IP, this is my account and it is the only account I have. Discrimination is not appreciated.
219: 33: 359:) was the sock), and this account's contributions focus on the exact same subject area, specifically, the deletion of the 356: 342: 148: 37: 196:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
94: 197: 123: 29: 191: 238: 138: 134: 130: 80:
to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome!
28:! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Knowledge's 373: 294: 169: 360: 367:. There's clearly a relationship. This account either belongs to Tethria or Fonatag or both. ~ 350: 336: 317: 154: 69: 364: 270: 202: 89: 73: 65: 49: 368: 363:
article that Tethria created. If it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it's a
290: 164: 147:. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 77: 61: 57: 53: 346: 332: 331:
There is no discrimination. This account was created right around the same time
45: 133:
that was created to violate Knowledge policy. Note that multiple accounts are
82: 378: 298: 174: 114: 100: 109: 182: 305:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
325:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
252: 248: 242: 233: 229: 215: 211: 207: 190:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
60:, and to the consensual community guidelines for 8: 7: 14: 78:deletion is not always the answer 345:) was blocked for sockpuppetry ( 113: 159:below, but you should read the 32:, and the pages describing the 26:to Knowledge's deletion process 1: 34:articles for deletion process 289:against on the basis of.) - 194:, who declined the request. 395: 277:) 11:57 am, Today (UTC−5) 21:Greetings, Raddman26, and 309:guide to appealing blocks 161:guide to appealing blocks 274: 157:|Your reason here ~~~~}} 379:17:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 299:19:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 175:15:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 101:05:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 187: 122:This account has been 76:. Also remember that 239:change block settings 186: 137:, but using them for 58:what Knowledge is not 50:neutral point of view 54:no original research 151:by adding the text 188: 377: 180: 179: 173: 149:appeal this block 38:proposed deletion 386: 371: 322: 316: 258: 256: 245: 227: 225:deleted contribs 185: 167: 158: 117: 110: 99: 97: 92: 87: 394: 393: 389: 388: 387: 385: 384: 383: 328: 320: 314: 313:, then use the 302: 279: 246: 236: 222: 205: 198:blocking policy 183: 152: 108: 95: 90: 83: 81: 42:speedy deletion 30:deletion policy 19: 12: 11: 5: 392: 390: 382: 381: 303: 286: 282:Decline reason 267: 263:Request reason 260: 181: 178: 177: 118: 107: 104: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 391: 380: 375: 370: 366: 362: 358: 355: 352: 348: 344: 341: 338: 334: 330: 329: 327: 326: 319: 312: 310: 301: 300: 296: 292: 285: 283: 278: 276: 272: 266: 264: 259: 254: 250: 244: 240: 235: 231: 226: 221: 217: 216:global blocks 213: 212:active blocks 209: 204: 199: 195: 193: 192:administrator 176: 171: 166: 162: 156: 150: 146: 142: 141: 136: 132: 128: 127: 125: 119: 116: 112: 111: 105: 103: 102: 98: 93: 88: 86: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 46:verifiability 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 25: 16: 353: 339: 324: 306: 304: 287: 281: 280: 268: 262: 261: 234:creation log 201: 189: 144: 140:illegitimate 139: 126:indefinitely 121: 120: 84: 66:corporations 23: 20: 131:sock puppet 62:biographies 361:Steve Wilk 230:filter log 307:read the 271:Raddman26 249:checkuser 208:block log 203:Raddman26 369:Amatulić 357:contribs 343:contribs 291:Vianello 220:contribs 165:Amatulić 163:first. ~ 143:reasons 365:WP:DUCK 347:Fonatag 333:Tethria 318:unblock 243:unblock 155:unblock 135:allowed 124:blocked 106:Blocked 74:fiction 24:welcome 17:Welcome 145:is not 72:, and 56:, and 40:, and 311:first 129:as a 70:music 374:talk 351:talk 337:talk 295:Talk 275:talk 170:talk 85:czar 253:log 200:). 321:}} 315:{{ 297:) 284:: 265:: 247:• 241:• 237:• 232:• 228:• 223:• 218:• 214:• 210:• 153:{{ 68:, 64:, 52:, 48:, 36:, 376:) 372:( 354:· 349:( 340:· 335:( 293:( 273:( 257:) 255:) 251:( 206:( 172:) 168:( 96:· 91:·

Index

welcome to Knowledge's deletion process
deletion policy
articles for deletion process
proposed deletion
speedy deletion
verifiability
neutral point of view
no original research
what Knowledge is not
biographies
corporations
music
fiction
deletion is not always the answer
czar
·
·
05:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

blocked
sock puppet
allowed
illegitimate
appeal this block
unblock
guide to appealing blocks
Amatulić
talk
15:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
administrator

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.