User talk:ReaderofthePack/Archive 9

2528:

the problem with notability will still be the same. What kept it from being notable wasn't the award's appropriateness but rather that overall there isn't enough coverage. It just isn't there. I know you want to promote your friend's book, but at this point I don't know how many times I can tell you that it isn't notable enough for it's own entry. It would really be better if you just let it rest at this point and wait for it to gain more coverage. Knowledge (XXG)'s rules for notability are pretty set and regardless of how nice it would be, they aren't going to change anytime soon. You've kind of got to learn when it's appropriate to stop pushing to have something posted on the mainspace, as is the case here. It just isn't notable and I'll be honest... if by some chance you do manage to talk someone into re-adding it, I'll nominate it for deletion. It's nice that you're trying to help out a friend, but you're not really doing her any favors at this point because it almost comes across like you're trying to use Knowledge (XXG) as a promotional outlet for the book. That might not be your intent, but the problem is when you're told multiple times that something doesn't pass notability guidelines but still keep trying to get it added without actually adding anything that would be usable as a RS, after a while it just sort of comes across badly.

1997:

will be brief. I'm kind of mixed in my opinion about trade reviews. They're usually fairly easy to find, which makes sourcing easier on me, but they're so brief and almost always positive, so the reliability of them has become increasingly suspect. The rest of the sources are unusable: The MediaBistro/Galleycat source is just a notification of an event that the author participated in and the rest are all non-notable awards that would be considered vanity awards by some users. As far as the claim of being on the PW magazine cover, I can't find where they've actually featured the book anywhere. I see primary sources that claim this, but nothing from PW themselves. This means that either it didn't happen or more likely, that it was one of several, several books that were thumbnailed onto the cover of the magazine. A search for the author's name on the PW website brings up no hits, which is fairly telling. PW almost always, always has some mention of an author on their website if they were to heavily feature them. I don't think they're lying, but I think that they're sort of overhyping something. In any case, I don't see where they've actually worked on any of the issues I mentioned on the article's

2485:." in the lead, but that's all that we can justify having. Anything other than that would be putting undue weight upon the book. That's all that I can justify having in the article for her. I hate to be blunt, but when it comes down to it most books only have a brief, BRIEF mention on the author's page. It's not up to Knowledge (XXG) to give lengthy mentions and sections to each book that someone puts out. That not only puts undue weight upon the book, but it also runs the risk of being promotion for the book. That's not what Knowledge (XXG) is for. The book has as much mention as it merits on Knowledge (XXG) at this point in time. If it ever gets more attention in the mainstream media then we can justify having an article and a lengthier section, but at this point it's inappropriate to create lengthy sections on a book that doesn't pass notability guidelines. The award that she won just isn't considered to be one that gives notability per Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines. I understand that you want people to know about the book that your friend wrote, but it'd be better off if you worked the blogging circuit rather than use Knowledge (XXG) to post more information about it. 161:

various items such as the iPod and home computer systems such as the Macintosh." Since you're listing things such as objectives and projected user bases, it's usually better to say something such as "The Community of Knowledge's primary goal is to focus on making content, knowledge, and discussions related to knowledge management practices more open and available to interested parties such as service providers, researchers, and authors interested in making their work and research findings open access. The organization also features discussion pages where users can exchange knowledge and form discussions between experts and interested users. In 2012 the Community of Knowledge carried out a survey among their users regarding their background in interests and published the results. The study found that the majority of readers defined themselves as ________, while __% defined themselves as ________."

235:

website that was my own work. Yes I own FileKangaroo.com . I have created other articles with no relations to links or websites and it got deleted. So i thought that it would be different if i created one based on my website. I know Knowledge (XXG) is not a place for advertising. But I thought that People could find the website better if they had a direct link to it. I apologize again if I have disturbed Knowledge (XXG) and it's users. I just really wanted my website to be connected with wikipedia. I know its really not my place to ask but. Would it be o.k to create an Article here based on FileKangaroo.com and not just two words and a external link.. If you approve of it let me know, if you say no I will not attempt to create it. I do wish to create other articles that have nothing to do with FileKangaroo.com and hope you can see past my bad behavior. Thank you and have a wonderful day.

1168:. I am somewhat torn here. I respect you as a diligent digger in any area, Michael Q as a film expert, and Lugnuts as an experienced editor also in the film area, but I do agree with the questioner that less than 24 hours was a little short for consensus and non-admin closing. I know little about Indian films (having watched a few in total incomprehension, but owning a few CDs of Bollywood music), so it's the procedural side I'm interested in here. I'm contacting Michael Q as another involved admin, and Tito Dutta as closer, and would appreciate your views on my talk page (rather than go to a drama board), if you get the chance. Cheers. 271:

am not the author of any of the resources , and in fact do not know Mr. Wardle. I am just a fan that noticed he did not have a article in en.wikipedia. His list of accomplishments is valuable and notable. Any help you can give me is appreciated. I waited 2 weeks for this. By the way, Mr. Wardle gives a lot back. He participates in charity functions and is the co-founder of www.Cruisewithacasue.ca which raises funds for cancer with an event scheduled for August 31 in Vancouver,BC, CA. I will add some of his participations but actually thought that was more like advertisement.

294:

Write my articles. I was just wondering though, did you remove the request for my userpage to be deleted? Thanks anyway if you didn't. Anyway I do have an understanding and I'm going to read more of Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines so that my Article creations may be more acceptable. Thank you again for being the better person. I still don't fully understand how I could Create a better Article that you will approve, even though I'm gonna read the guidelines I would understand more if you gave me a few more tips. Thank you and have a good day. :)

1307:

so it can't show notability either. We need stuff such as news coverage and the like. As far as the buzzwordy section, I can change that myself. It was the line "During the years 2000s, it has constantly grown in size and revenues, establishing itself as one of the most reputable international provider of fiduciary services, especially in the offshore sector." Saying "one of the most reputable international provider of fiduciary services" comes across as a little promotional, so it's usually better to avoid using phrases like that.

1838: 709:

something to do with their college, even tenuously. My rule of thumb for sources like that is this: You're not really going to get a good solid "yes" answer on any source that has even a potential COI/primary issue with it, so it's usually best not to rely on those as anything other than a primary source. Even if the connection is somewhat tenuous (the students attend the college but run the magazine separately) it's still considered a close enough connection to where it'd be seen as primary.

3215:(meaning, did I do something wrong?) but I also have my next article I'd like to start inputting there. At your convenience, can you look into it and blank my sandbox (AND delete that second redundant sandbox which I believe also still exists?) OR forward my request to someone better suited to deal with such things? I'm only coming to you with this because I recalled your previous help, and I'm so bad with these things! This link should take you to the main sandbox: 2001:. I've explained to them why the current sources are lacking and I honestly don't believe that this would pass an AfD if I were to nominate it straight off. I think it'd end up exactly how it is now: as a redirect. If they want to run it through AfD then I can, but it'd likely end up with the article as a whole getting deleted. I'm just a little leery of the situation, as their justifications on the talk page were kind of the type that are the epitome of 2721: 1184: 31: 1356:, they're both not able to show notability because they're considered to be database type entries. They can back up that the firm exists, but can't extend any notability. In the end I just don't see enough coverage in reliable sources to really show notability at this time. It's frustrating, but you can still keep working on the article in your userspace until more sources become available. You might want to try asking for help at 2855: 1533: 2545:

write about the book. Once those appear, then we can talk about getting it re-added. Again, at this point it just kind of seems like you're trying to use Knowledge (XXG) as a place to promote the book and it comes across a little like spam. And again, this might not be your intent but that's what it's coming across like. You've got to know when continuing to push the point hurts your cause more than helps it.

1391: 2747: 565: 521: 1710: 156:

reading a bit like a CV or resume for the company. Bullet style writing is one of those things that sticks out as a resume/CV type thing and is somewhat discouraged in general as far as editing goes. Not only for that reason, but also because sometimes it just doesn't really flow as well as a paragraph could. I'd probably recommend asking for some help at

823: 2809: 489:, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request 171:

I have to really recommend that you look into some of the various applicable WikiProjects, as they can help you find sources and also help with working on getting the flow down. I hope you don't take any of this as an insult- I know that when I first started writing articles I had to have people say pretty much the same things to me over my edits.

2544:

Let's put it this way: apart from several newspapers such as the New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle, or SF Weekly reviewing the book and/or writing about it, there's not much that can be done at this point to show notability. Get Kondazian to supply them with review copies and try to get them to

1235: 1035:

I read your message. It's very weird. You said you're in your 30s. But it says you're still at school, or do you mean not in years. Unfortunatly, Most information is already on Knowledge (XXG). So I have very little instrest. If you could give me any things to put on Knowledge (XXG) please send it to

1002:

Hi Tokyogirl79 could I ask you why you deleted "imprevisti su misura" from the list of improvisational companies in other countries? It's a real existing troupe in Milan - Italy, it's not mentioned for advertising, but only to enrich the list of companies. What is wrong in this? Thank you very much!

801:

Thanks for accepting the play page. I have submitted some more play pages and that being my interest area would be happy if you could check some of those when you have time. I have referred to multiple sources while creation of such pages, and would like to see some more of these accepted as stubs so

270:

I will try to rewrite the article but the sources are published sources. This person is an actor and several of his costars in the Heartland show have articles that are less documented than the one I wrote. If you look at Michelle Morgan, Amber Marshall and Nathaniel Arcand you can see what I mean. I

2635:

sub-articles into redirects to the parent page, on the basis of only inherited notability. It didn't seem controversial and I tried to finish the job (converting the remaining double redirects too) Would you kindly look through what I've done and see if I've not overlooked anything or done something

2476:

Really and truthfully, we can't really merit more than a few sentences on Kondazian's page and just a brief mention on Weigert's page. I've added a bibliography section that says he narrated it, but we can't justify any more than that. We don't include lengthy sections on each book that a person has

2435:

Hi Tokyogirl79, thank you for all your help thus far. I was hoping to re-add the cover of the novel again that was once there but wikipedia won't let me. Karen Kondazian has full rights to the cover by artist Jeffrey DeCola and this was established months ago before the page was taken down. The only

2034:

with it as well and there's been some fairly clear COI editing on both ends. (It's since cleaned up, though.) I hate to sound like I'm trying to bite them, but the book's article doesn't have any place on Knowledge (XXG) at this point in time. Maybe in the future if it gains more coverage in RS, but

170:

I'm sure that the paragraph can be tweaked, but that's sort of a basic gist of how you can phrase this instead of bullets. It reads a little more smoothly and while it certainly isn't perfect, paragraphs can often keep people from getting an immediate "resume" or "pamphlet" feel from the page. Again

2527:

Honestly, the problem is that ultimately the book does not pass notability guidelines for books. The coverage isn't enough to show that it's notable outside of the author. There's nothing to be done for it until she gains coverage in sources that we consider to be reliable. You can keep asking, but

2124:

That's strange... I thought I'd created it like normal. I don't remember putting anything into the header field, but that's because I didn't see one. I'd started the SPI off as usual, entering in the suspected main sock into the box on the main SPI logging page. From there I put the other potential

1306:

There are a few words that sound a little buzzy when put together, but the biggest problem is that we don't have any reliable sources to show notability. The company's website is a primary source and the other link is just a directory listing, which is more of a primary source or a routine listing,

886:

You said: "If you want a copy of the page to work on and look for sources, I'm more than willing to transfer a copy onto your userspace". OK, then, do it. It's clear that Knowledge (XXG) isn't the place to have this information, so I'm just going to have to go and make my own website for it, where

234:

I understand what has happened was completely immature, though we all make mistakes, I hope that is something you can relate to. I sincerely apologize for my links and rants. I love Knowledge (XXG) very much. It is one of my favorite websites. I just wanted to be able to contribute something to the

2055:

Thank you for the very thorough response. I would like to note however that the editor was not trying to get around you for another opinion, they wanted to contact you directly but are currently caught in an autoblock and I told them I would post a note here for you on their behalf. I'll certainly

2029:

that were made to the page per the author's request. She didn't edit it directly, which is good, but the problem is that the edits weren't really anything that would show notability. I kind of let it sit for a while, but eventually decided that it would be best served as a redirect to the author's

1996:

It's still not ready. The first two sources are good. They're from the same source (CBS), but they're reliable ones. The Library Journal is iffy. Technically it's still a book review, but trade reviews are starting to get increasing guff from people at AfD because it's a trade review and by nature

155:

Well... the problem is that the subject (a non-profit) doesn't have to be promotional in nature or obscure for the article itself to come across as promotional. It's not always about the intent of the writer, but how the page seems to appear when read. For me the promotional-ish tone comes from it

3123:

You've been warned several times on your userpage. At this point you should be carefully reading over the messages posted on your talk page as well as in the summary edits on the pages in question. Inexperience isn't an excuse now, especially if the reason you are continuing to make controversial

160:

on their talk page. Bullets are mostly, in my experience, used more for lists of information such as titles that an author has put out. Sometimes it can be used for products for a company, but if the list is very large then sometimes it's best to use a paragraph format and say "Apple has released

116:

Hi Tokyogirl79, Tanks for your comments - I understand what you mean, the formulation in the translation wasn't the best. I rewrote some parts and added another source. Since this is a non-profit platform and is quite known among people in the (German-speaking) field, it is surely not meant to be

1347:

it's a brief mention. Brief mentions aren't really usable as far as showing notability goes, although we can use it to back up small data. It's kind of tricky when it comes to using book sources, as where the book has been published also factors into this. For example, a book published through a

293:

I appreciate your understanding to the fullest, I learned something valuable that many battles should not be fought as they are fought. There can be be peace and civilized Behavior like what you thought me, that can ease the pressure off anyone. I thank you again for explaining how I could still

672:

Also, while most of the students behind the magazine do visit one of the local universities (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), the student organization publishing it and the magazine itself are not an organ of the university. Could references 1 and 4, which mainly comments on the magazine, be

3043:

Please for the love of God, stop making this article until this has been fully discussed! Making even a move to another page is considered a controversial move and this can be seen as a revert war action! I hate to do it, but I'm reporting you to ANI as this needs further people coming in. I'm

708:

The problem is that even if the school isn't officially publishing it, the students have an affiliation with the university. In stuff like this it's still seen as a conflict of interest since many would see it as in the college's best interest to positively review or mention something that has

357:

Hey! Thanks for leaving a message about this and to the other person that left all that information. I've been away for vacation, but things in my own life have been a little hectic lately, so I've been somewhat ignoring my talk page for right now. :) I haven't really had a lot of energy to go

3100:

I have been warned, but sometimes warnings (especially in the Edit summary) are easy to overlook when trying to make multiple edits to the article itself. Please forgive my inexperience, and if you have anything meaningful to contribute to the genre's discussion, please do so on the article's

2588:

of Al Tamimi Investments. I intend on expanding the article further. The thing is like you said, many of the resources are in Arabic for this company. I also saw your suggestion for creating a standalone article for the event this company organizes. The thing is that this company has multiple

1338:

source looks to be good to me. Interviews are always sort of up in the air when it comes to whether or not it can be used to show notability, so this might be a point of contention with other users. You listed two book sources, but I can't verify how in-depth the mention is in

1785:

Wow, I completely missed the source. The huge table of "example" made me miss it- I was just so awestruck that someone actually went to the trouble to create a table that big full of just the word example. I'll revert the deletion for you since you're actively working on it.

653:) and for your comments. I actually looked into existing articles about student magazines and used them as an orientation on how to improve to article before I resubmitted it. Now I'll do my best to improve it a little more, but there some things that are not quite clear yet. 2589:

subsidiaries and each of those subsidiaries is notable (reliable source coverage and all). I think it would be better to have an article about the parent company that discusses all the subsidiaries rather than having an article for each subsidiary. Let me know your thoughts.

2030:

page. That's when I kind of got the "but why can't we have it, it's useful and is becoming more notable" arguments on the talk page, among the other arguments. I honestly have to say that at best it was more of a puff page than anything else. The author's page also had some

2164:

I'm trying to think if I had any extra spaces or whatnot in the first step of SPI, but I can't honestly remember. I usually just cut and paste the suspected sockmaster's name in the first field, so I don't know if that got an extra space in it that would mess up anything.

2508:

for consideration to be put back up onto mainspace? I got rid of the award that you said was inappropriate and included nothing about the audio book. Can we put this back up or please provide me with instructions how to re-submit for consideration? Thank you for time.

2273:

The issue with this is that they're all for a school project. I thought I'd asked the user to work on them in their userspace. All I can do is warn them and maybe move them. You might have to bring this up on AN/I if all else fails. There's only so much I can do.

3314: 2098:

I've repaired the SPI page, but I was wondering if you could let me know how you created the page so we can figure out what went wrong and how to fix it. What steps (in as much detail as you can remember) did you go through in order to create this SPI?

666: 3249:

I presume that, as the person who deleted it, you can get at it. I wonder if you might be able to drop the last revision (ideally, more than one revision, as I don't remember it as simply a list) onto my talk page, or somewhere else that I can see it.

665:, but since the articles are less about reporting findings but rather exposing opinions and analysis, not many quotations or citations are made on them. Academia contributing to the magazine do however list them among their relevant publications (e.g. 2452:

Those are all the edits I would like to make before submitting it to you for approval. Can you please advise me on how to do this? If one or none of these edits can be made - that's okay, so long as we get the page up that you are comfortable with.

2606:

You just have to make sure that you have sourcing for the article to show that it's notable outside of the contest it runs. As long as you can prove that by independent and reliable secondary sources, the article should be safe from deletion fears.

1659: 1634:

I've found additional reliable sources providing reliable coverage of the subject in The Times, El Confidencial and Jezebel. I've included them in the deletion discussion and I invite you to review them and ask you to reconsider your !vote.

731:

Thank you for your advice. I think i took the last editors (who i since find out has been suspended) comments too strongly and used the quotes to substantiate Wolfe's aptness for Wiki but may have gone over board with the positive quotes :)

2399: 1144:

I've rewritten a new listing for this open access journal to account for A7 and G11 concerns. I'm happy to make changes as advised but the deletion was so fast that I didn't have a chance. Do you want to preview the new listing?

2703:, in both cases without redirects. I then moved the disambiguation page (along with its talk page) to the undisambiguated title. One advantage of this procedure is that the moves are easily reversible if it ever comes to that. 2025:. It had some pretty serious issues with it, such as using Goodreads as a source and other unreliable sources. That this version made it through AfC was pretty awful and one of my biggest pet peeves about AfC. There were 656:

You mentioned the criteria. I've looked into them and I don't think they are completely applicable, since the Karlsruhe Transfer is not considered an academic journal but more a student magazine. They are listed in the

3210:

sandbox to which I'd moved the work-in-progress. Confusing again? I've since then completed the article and moved it into mainspace/article, BUT... it's still appearing in my sandbox, and not only am I wondering

929: 2192: 1349: 1340: 3065:

to the genre's article to avoid being blocked by you and other admins, or having my work deleted, I will do so. Please provide a fair warning (I appreciate this) and for the love of God, use the

961:

u said that turophobia is real enough, rite? May I ask if u can prove another phobia is worth adding? Specifically episcophobia - a fear of bishops. Queen Victoria had it when she was a child...

3172: 2442:

One other thing I wanted to see if it was possible to add general information about an audio book being released in November 2012 narrated by Robin Weigert who has a wikipedia page as well -

1165: 1066:

I am, I'm attending college part-time. Hmm... as far as stuff that you could put in... have you ever read the Wimpy Kid books? We can use more detailed synopses for some of the later books.

3240:

Hi – I understand that you deleted the page List_of_games_with_mutable_rules. I understand that it was because it was a "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics ". Fair enough.

2145:

Hmmm. OK, thanks for getting back to me. The mystery continues, I guess. I've seen something very much like this twice during the past week. I'm sure we'll figure it out eventually. —

2956:. Both you and me have told him enough times that he cannot change the subject of the article, copy-paste moves are completely inappropriate, and that he should just create the article at 3084:

You've been warned. Several times over by several different editors. People have tried to explain proper procedure to you and you've flat out ignored people. I've reported you to ANI.

1545: 1532: 1323:

Hi, I've added many sources to the page, could you please take a look and confirm that I can publish the page, I don't want to have a bad surprises anymore ? Thank you very much. (

323: 2738: 1292:

Hi, I want to thank you for the great work you've done for the page Carlo Scevola & Partners, I was wondering if you can review the page before I publish it, this the link

1197: 1453:

Just wanted to see if you could take a look at this unblock request and username change request and give some advice on what the next steps would be for that user. Thank you.

403:

No problem! I gave him a warning that he had one chance and that after that he'd be blocked as a spammer. I also asked one of the appropriate WP to keep an eye on it as well.

3148:

Even after our additional comments on the talk page, including my recent response that basically debunked everything he said. Guess what our friend Ben0kto did again :).

1427: 2005:. That they tried to go around me and persuade someone else to approve the page kind of makes me a little extra leery, as they know they didn't fix any of the issues. 423:

Thanks for that as well - basically, thanks for picking up my slack. :-) It's nice to have some confirmation that my instincts are on the money from time to time. --

1811: 1348:

publisher such as John Wiley & Sons would be considered a potential source while a self-publishing company such as AuthorHouse wouldn't. Now when it comes to

2125:

socks into the various fields and gave a bit of evidence. Other than that, I don't recall anything else- it was pretty standard as far as the SPIs I've done go.

1628: 2695:

Hey! in this case it's best to move the old page history and talk page out of the way to preserve them, which I've done in this case. I moved "Fluffy bunny" to

1335: 3124:

edits is because you aren't paying close enough attention to what people are trying to tell you. That's when it goes past inexperience and becomes negligence.

1293: 2253: 2095:. For some reason, the SPI request page you created was malformed — there is some header information which needs to be at the top of the page (but wasn't). 430: 389: 2195:

to article space, and unfortunately I made some intervening edits. It's getting late here and I would like to clean up the mess I made before I turn in.

199:, and is intertwined with existing Knowledge (XXG) articles. So can you elaborate what is the difference between an essay and and encyclopedic entry? 1706:- you might want to consider removing talk page access if the user is just going to repeatedly add empty edit request templates. Strange one, that guy. 2035:

right now? No. But like I said, if they're unhappy then I can run it through AfD, but that would probably end in the deletion of the article entirely.

596:

code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

2477:

narrated. To be honest, we can't entirely justify a lengthy section on The Whip in Kondazian's page either. I've placed "In 2012 Kondazian published

157: 650: 637: 3178:

Hey Tokyogirl. I almost never ask this, but could I ask you to put this AfD out of its misery if you have a moment? It's been up for request at

493:

of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

2504:

Hi Tokyogirl79 - thank you for your response and looking into this deeper. Is it possible that per your instructions, I can submit the wiki page

1489: 2302:? It appears to be a kid putting their name and the address of their school out there, which is information that REALLY shouldn't be available. 2653:

Looks good from what I can see at first glance. I like that you remembered to remove the linking- that's something I many times forget to do!

2929: 1892:

We have some vandalism around here. User:24.170.77.177 has been making constant vandalism by adding unsources information on on the articles

905: 578:

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply

195:

Thanks for your review. Technically, I don't know yet how to implement your changes. And BTW the structure of the article is based on the

3243:

However, I found the content useful. I can't get to that valuable information currently, as I don't have permission to view deleted pages.

2298:

Hey, please can you - if it's something you can do? - completely block/hide the revision for 16:49, September 26, 2013‎ by 90.211.17.73 on

215: 97: 89: 84: 1344: 572: 558: 486: 474: 382:

Awesome - thanks for that. I'd have removed that stuff myself, but I already did once and didn't want to get sucked into an edit war. --

264: 2436:

other item I added under reception was it won Best Western/Best Historical Fiction by the 2013 Global Ebook awards and cited the page -

1608:

Done! I think I'll move it into your userspace so you can work on it at your leisure without fear of it getting tagged by another user.

762: 110: 72: 67: 59: 2982:

Tokyo Girl, I appreciate your concerns as I am sure they are legitimate. However, if you have any questions or comments regarding the

3294:, an article you contributed to the proposed deletion of, after the deletion was contested. You may wish to take it to AfD instead. — 1730: 696: 1972: 1052: 2252:

I think we have faced "conflicts of interest" from editors who have no idea about "notability" obviously. Links to documents by

1975:, however the creator is requesting it be moved to article space if you are satisfied with the content and sourcing. Thoughts?-- 2700: 1945: 1897: 1019: 1893: 2393: 1088: 2696: 2594: 1952:

that the next time he vandalize pages, he may get blocked from editing. I'll revert his edits and warn him one more time.

310: 251: 141: 1746: 1439: 424: 383: 1929: 1485: 599:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:

3155: 2971: 2673: 38: 1583: 2933: 2765: 2299: 1957: 1579: 1276: 1217: 1190: 1183: 948: 346: 47: 17: 2585: 3299: 3244: 2590: 2311: 1913: 1595: 1279: 936: 738: 276: 211: 1814:. I did not want to move it again without adding the additional content. Thanks for the head's up. Cheers. 2447:

Lastly, I want to link the mention of the novel "The Whip" on Karen Kondazian's wikipedia page to this page.

1256: 3024:

I would also like to point out that the article was not copied word for word and the article has since been

2961: 2868: 1949: 846:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

758: 2925: 1040: 1007: 750: 684: 571:

Hello Tokyogirl79. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled

494: 298: 239: 203: 129: 2641: 2235: 2200: 1703: 1458: 1324: 1297: 1130: 1106: 807: 2998:

to the best of my ability, to ensure the information I see here is accurate. I don't like to seem like a

1481: 658: 207: 3272: 3226: 3150: 3128: 3088: 3048: 3025: 2966: 2657: 2611: 2549: 2532: 2489: 2375: 2337: 2278: 2216: 2169: 2129: 2039: 2009: 1998: 1810:

I have added some additional international sources for the page that was recently moved to my talk page

1790: 1686: 1612: 1504: 1368: 1311: 1070: 982: 912: 754: 713: 692: 407: 362: 175: 1837: 803: 452: 3313:

As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at

2957: 2333:

Sorry! I'd missed it! I've left the user a warning and removed the information from the edit history.

1263: 1234: 688: 3258: 3254: 3190: 2569: 2565: 2514: 2510: 2463: 2459: 1953: 1750: 1361: 1269: 1210: 1048: 941: 892: 872: 502: 339: 3291: 1011: 3295: 2905: 2836: 2755:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2261: 2151: 2108: 1591: 1562: 1516: 1015: 330: 272: 3106: 3070: 3029: 3011: 3007: 2353:

Cheers! Do you know if there's a quicker way to go about flagging these up should it arise again?

1146: 527: 490: 133: 118: 2872: 2815: 2789: 2709: 2681: 2437: 1878: 1844: 787: 464: 3179: 2317:

Just checking to see if you saw this, apologies if it's not something you can do as an admin...

1357: 3322: 3110: 3074: 3033: 3015: 3003: 2637: 2482: 2231: 2196: 2191:

Tokyogirl79, could I bother you to delete a page for me? I need to reverse a move I made from

1862: 1819: 1775: 1758: 1738: 1503:

Thanks for the heads-up. The FYI comment above made me wonder if you hadn't chanced upon this

1454: 1408: 1353: 1173: 1150: 1126: 1102: 1096: 966: 306: 247: 137: 122: 2999: 2057: 3326: 3303: 3279: 3269: 3262: 3230: 3222: 3192: 3161: 3135: 3125: 3114: 3095: 3085: 3078: 3055: 3045: 3037: 3019: 2977: 2953: 2937: 2909: 2884: 2880: 2840: 2821: 2793: 2734: 2714: 2685: 2664: 2654: 2645: 2618: 2608: 2598: 2573: 2556: 2546: 2539: 2529: 2518: 2496: 2486: 2467: 2422: 2382: 2372: 2362: 2358: 2344: 2334: 2326: 2322: 2307: 2285: 2275: 2265: 2239: 2223: 2213: 2204: 2176: 2166: 2159: 2136: 2126: 2116: 2073: 2046: 2036: 2016: 2006: 1988: 1961: 1882: 1852: 1848: 1823: 1797: 1787: 1779: 1762: 1723: 1720: 1690: 1682: 1644: 1640: 1619: 1609: 1599: 1566: 1521: 1493: 1462: 1435: 1412: 1375: 1365: 1318: 1308: 1220: 1177: 1154: 1134: 1110: 1077: 1067: 1056: 1023: 989: 979: 970: 951: 919: 909: 896: 876: 811: 791: 766: 720: 710: 700: 630: 621: 548: 539: 506: 468: 436: 414: 404: 395: 369: 359: 349: 314: 280: 255: 219: 182: 172: 145: 2403: 2002: 1678: 1587: 3315:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria

3183: 2727: 2720: 2420: 2071: 1986: 1905: 1578:

Hi, I am impressed with your polite responsibility to notify and discuss the deleted page

1044: 888: 868: 827: 782:

and add spoilers for character's lives and please fixed grammar or don't remove this by --

498: 482: 196: 3203: 3062: 2995: 1253:

in appreciation for your sourcing and style improvements to the article on the 2002 film

2505: 3202:

Hi Tokyogirl, you helped me not too long ago with deleting a redundant sandbox for the

2901: 2854: 2832: 2257: 2146: 2103: 1921: 1554: 1509: 1480:

to the template. But maybe you just forgot and my message is unnecessary pedantry :) --

1267:" into a silk purse to benefit the project and its readers. Well done again thank you, 835: 1681:

into a balanced, informative article with good references, in almost no time. Thanks,

1364:, as either or both might be able to find additional sources to help show notability. 3102: 3066: 2987: 2785: 2705: 2677: 2092: 1909: 1874: 1674: 1093:

Perhaps the "type" parameter of the Atschool template might help clarify things. Use

783: 460: 3219: 3318: 2922:(at the bottom), and best regards. This is C o l t o n C o s m i c. 9:32 AM, EST. 2775: 2632: 1933: 1925: 1900:

without providing a reliable source. He has been vandalizing other pages including

1815: 1771: 1754: 1404: 1390: 1169: 962: 779: 456: 302: 243: 2948:

Hey Tokyogirl79, I would like to point out to you that the same user is hijacking

2831:

Thank you for fixing my Article for Creation page! I'm new here and was confused.

2400:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests

1036:

me. Then read it and edit it to suit the Knowledge (XXG) users needs. Thank you

609:, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission. 579: 2876: 2354: 2318: 2303: 1937: 1917: 1715: 1636: 1431: 615: 533: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3221:(I hope the links actually link!). Thanks in advance and sorry to be a bother! 1749:

to save it from deletion. Does that mean I'm going to have to spray-paint the

3216: 2410: 2061: 1976: 863:{{cite web|title=Australian/Vogel award turns 30|url=http://www.theaustralian. 520: 2674:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Angelo_Perrella

3268:

Sounds reasonable. I'll move a copy into your userspace for you to work on.

3044:

officially feeling too involved to really make a non-partial decision here.

1941: 1753:"hatchet-person" logo on my Corolla before it gets a stand-alone article? -- 1658: 3245:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Undelete/List_of_games_with_mutable_rules

2983: 2949: 2799: 739:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Beatie_Wolfe

601:{{subst:Refund/G13|Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Jesusween}} 3206:

article I was working on (which also caused a confusing deletion of the

2294:

Request for complete concealment of edit giving child's name and address

662: 2371:

Not really- you just have to chase down an admin as far as I can tell.

1901: 1742: 1540: 1125:

Thanks for helping out with the deletes on my userspace drafts! :) --

839: 802:

that other users can edit and improve on them using their knowledge.

2805:

Thought I'd create a proper stub for that, without all the nonsense

612:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.

2091:

You submitted an SPI request a couple hours ago regarding the user

1770:

Edit: "Shirt58's strange sense humour" tags added as appropriate.--

930:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kirby: Fright to the Finish!!

2752:

Hello, ReaderofthePack. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2193:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Audiovisual Translation

661:(Notes and Examples, point 6.) and in the German National Library 1586:

Please re-store SSF, I would initiate to bring the article up to

735:

I've rewritten following your guidance to make it more neutral.

859:

Gentill's ''A Few Right Thinking Men'' was nominated for a 2011

676:

Again, thanks for your help and I look forward to your comments!

3173:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rent My Vacation Home USA

2994:

can edit and I will make constructive edits in accordance with

2088:

Hi. I'm one of the clerks at Sockpuppet Investigations (SPI).

939:

where we already have content on this compilation makes sense.

2438:

http://globalebookawards.com/2013-global-ebook-awards-winners/

1166:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Horror Story (2013 film)

25: 2894:

Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning

2745: 2741:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2719: 1544:, Tokyogirl79. You have got at least one new message at the 1531: 1200:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1182: 563: 3006:

genre and new albums should be moved or parenthesized per

358:

around, but I'm trying to get into the swing of things.

2506:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Roksenberg/The_Whip_(novel)

2060:

with them to address the COI issues with the accounts. --

1546:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics

324:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Passage (2009 film)

2021:

In any case, long story short... I came across the page

1677:! You turned a completely hopeless article destined for 638:

Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/Karlsruher Transfer

2920: 2757: 2402:

usually results in quick action, as does a request via

2031: 2026: 2022: 1570: 1473: 1205: 847: 843: 831: 727:

Resubmitted after your helpful suggestions Beatie Wolfe

605: 580: 451:

Thanks for the barn star. Obviously I saw your note at

334: 2564:

Thank you. I appreciate all your help on this matter.

1912:

in week 5 without adding a source and has been adding

1261:, essentially changing what was seen as a newcomer's " 1249:

I am both pleased and honored to present you with the

3236:

Copy of deleted page List_of_games_with_mutable_rules

1428:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Wasbir Hussain

487:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Jesusween

475:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Jesusween

265:

Knowledge (XXG);Articles for Creation/Graham Wardle

2892:Yes! Great job on the sourcing, especially finding 2248:

More non-notable Christianity-related pages created

1101:for the template to say "This user is in college." 842:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just 667:

Publikationen von Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. Swen Körner

2990:. To be fair, Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopedia 2726:Hello, ReaderofthePack. You have new messages at 1189:Hello, ReaderofthePack. You have new messages at 2102:Sorry to bother you, and thanks for any help. — 1629:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Arden Leigh 3002:, but this article in fact concerns an existing 1971:Hi Tokyogirl79 - I'm not sure of the history of 854:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 3069:page yourself when making controversial edits. 1164:I've received a query about the NAC of the AfD 1812:User:Ppt1973/UFC Fight Night: Hunt vs. Bigfoot 1527:Re: Anyone interested in userfying an article? 2631:Salutations! I've recently converted many of 8: 2254:Pontifical Council for Social Communications 1476:. You can sign the block messages by adding 158:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet culture 2584:Greetings. Ty for your suggestions on the 2056:point them to your response while I work 1656: 1232: 2672:Hi, can you also review this again too: 2398:Finding an active admin who's listed at 1765:</Shirt58's strange sense humour: --> 649:Thank you for reviewing the submission ( 1894:List of NFL on Fox commentator pairings 1736:<Shirt58's strange sense humour: --> 1548:. Please continue the discussion there! 2952:again, and copy-pasted the article to 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2986:, please leave them on the article's 2964:, but he refuses to heed our advice. 2806: 2431:User talk:Roksenberg/The Whip (novel) 978:If we can find proof for it, we can. 906:User:Geezerbill/Twelve inches on tape 830:. I have automatically detected that 485:. I just wanted to let you know that 7: 2756: 1707: 3218:and this to the redundant sandbox: 2691:Re: Help with an AfD history merge? 1673:Great work on the total rewrite of 1288:Carlo Scevola & Partners review 526:Thanks for acting fast on deleting 111:User:Sshaked/Community of Knowledge 1300:) 00:27, 04 September 2013 (UTC) 797:Thanks for reviewing Chitra (play) 459:article. It's on my watchlist now. 24: 2481:, a novel based upon the life of 1731:A World Upside Down: The Mixxtape 1403:Thanks very much for your help. 1327:) 06:17, 09 September 2013 (UTC) 743:Thank you for your time on this. 2853: 2807: 2293: 2032:puffery and unsourced bio issues 1836: 1708: 1657: 1389: 1233: 1225: 821: 673:considered as secondary sources? 519: 497:. Thank you for your attention. 29: 2701:Talk:Fluffy bunny/Old talk page 1946:List of NBA on TNT broadcasters 1898:List of NBA on TNT broadcasters 512:A bowl of strawberries for you! 2665:09:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC) 2646:09:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC) 2619:05:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC) 2599:05:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC) 2574:17:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC) 2557:23:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC) 2540:23:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC) 2519:22:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC) 2497:04:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 2468:19:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 2423:16:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 2383:10:26, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 2363:10:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 2345:09:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 2327:09:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 2312:17:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 2286:09:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 2266:15:06, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 2240:07:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2224:07:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2205:07:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2187:Need help with an article move 2177:06:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2160:06:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2137:05:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2117:05:48, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2074:16:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2047:03:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 2017:03:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 1989:20:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 1962:23:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1883:13:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1853:04:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1824:13:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC) 1798:10:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 1780:10:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 1763:10:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 1724:03:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 1691:20:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 1645:14:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 1620:10:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC) 1600:10:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC) 1567:08:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC) 1522:11:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC) 1472:Hello Tokyogirl, I've noticed 1376:08:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC) 1140:Business Ethics Journal Review 603:, paste it in the edit box at 1: 2697:Talk:Fluffy bunny/Old history 1737:Heck darn it Tg79, I started 1494:07:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC) 1463:20:37, 5 September 2013 (UTC) 1449:RE: Setter Capital Inc. block 1441:16:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) 1413:23:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 1319:04:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC) 1280:07:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 1251:Researcher's Silk Purse Award 1243:Researcher's Silk Purse Award 1226:Researcher's Silk Purse Award 315:03:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC) 289:Hello Tokyogirl. User:ryan889 256:03:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 125:) 11:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 3327:04:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 3304:06:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC) 3280:10:11, 16 October 2013 (UTC) 3263:08:46, 13 October 2013 (UTC) 3231:04:00, 13 October 2013 (UTC) 3193:09:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC) 3162:15:05, 13 October 2013 (UTC) 3136:16:07, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 3115:15:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 3096:15:32, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 3079:15:30, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 3056:15:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 3038:15:20, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 3020:15:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 2978:14:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 2938:13:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 2761:at any time by removing the 1294:Carlo Scevola & Partners 937:Kirby: Right Back at Ya!#DVD 2910:15:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC) 2885:14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC) 2841:05:33, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 2822:05:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 2794:17:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 2735:07:19, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 2715:06:12, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 2686:20:19, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 1667:The Article Rescue Barnstar 1221:11:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC) 1191:MichaelQSchmidt's talk page 1178:10:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC) 1155:19:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC) 1135:12:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 1111:02:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC) 1078:04:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 1057:19:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 1024:16:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 990:08:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC) 971:08:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC) 952:06:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 920:06:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 897:20:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 877:10:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 812:19:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC) 792:14:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC) 767:10:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC) 721:04:27, 18 August 2013 (UTC) 701:11:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 631:08:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 549:08:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 507:16:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 469:12:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 437:19:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 415:03:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 396:16:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC) 281:14:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 220:23:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 183:03:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 146:10:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 3342: 1904:. He has been saying that 1869:Thank you for cleaning up 370:10:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 350:21:35, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 3061:If I need to stop making 2852: 2699:and its old talk page to 2300:List of fashion designers 2256:can help you navigate. -- 1663: 1580:Sunni Students Federation 1388: 1239: 18:User talk:ReaderofthePack 3198:User:Penwatchdog/sandbox 887:people can't delete it. 657:"Zeitschriftendatenbank" 557:Your article submission 3028:using the move button. 2869:Ilsa, the Wicked Warden 1948:. I have warned him on 1908:will be filling in for 1873:. Beautiful stuff! ; ) 848:my operator's talk page 2962:Acid Rap (music genre) 2750: 2724: 2456:Thanks for your time. 2156:(no relation to Jimbo) 2113:(no relation to Jimbo) 1704:User talk:Deep Dhudiya 1699:User talk:Deep Dhudiya 1536: 1257:I'll Bury You Tomorrow 1187: 935:I think a redirect to 568: 426:Ser Amantio di Nicolao 385:Ser Amantio di Nicolao 337:on your work. Thanks, 2861:The Editor's Barnstar 2749: 2723: 2580:Al Tamimi Investments 1829:Some baklava for you! 1535: 1397:The Teamwork Barnstar 1186: 882:Twelve Inches On Tape 567: 42:of past discussions. 3309:Request for comment 2407:#wikipedia-en-revdel 1751:Psychopathic Records 838:may have broken the 2846:A barnstar for you! 2591:Muhammad Ali Khalid 2230:Thank you so much! 1747:exclusive interview 1382:A barnstar for you! 904:It's been moved to 651:Karlsruher Transfer 581:edit the submission 333:, I went ahead and 331:Passage (2009 film) 3063:constructive edits 2896:as a footnote for 2873:A Gun for Jennifer 2758:remove this notice 2751: 2739:remove this notice 2725: 1967:Article evaluation 1843:For the destroid! 1650:A barnstar for you 1571:remove this notice 1537: 1198:remove this notice 1188: 778:i finshed reading 569: 432:Lo dicono a Signa. 391:Lo dicono a Signa. 230:Hello Tokyogirl79. 3290:I have undeleted 3004:underground music 2928:comment added by 2890: 2889: 2728:Trevj's talk page 2627:Spare a minute... 2483:Charley Parkhurst 2394:talk page stalker 2158: 2115: 2023:back in September 1871:The Flamethrowers 1863:The Flamethrowers 1858: 1857: 1782: 1739:Toledo City Paper 1696: 1695: 1552:Message added by 1418: 1417: 1325:Elboukharimu talk 1298:Elboukharimu talk 1285: 1284: 1264:sow's ear article 1204:Never mind. Been 1089:talk page stalker 1060: 1043:comment added by 1027: 1010:comment added by 770: 753:comment added by 704: 687:comment added by 629: 554: 553: 547: 530:. Keep it up. :) 318: 301:comment added by 259: 242:comment added by 223: 206:comment added by 191:About Run Jericho 149: 132:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3333: 3276: 3188: 3158: 3153: 3132: 3092: 3052: 2974: 2969: 2958:Acid Rap (genre) 2954:Acid Rap (album) 2940: 2857: 2850: 2849: 2820: 2818: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2782: 2780: 2774: 2770: 2764: 2760: 2748: 2742: 2712: 2661: 2636:stupid? Thanks, 2615: 2553: 2536: 2493: 2418: 2408: 2397: 2379: 2341: 2282: 2220: 2173: 2154: 2133: 2111: 2069: 2043: 2027:additional edits 2013: 1984: 1840: 1833: 1832: 1794: 1769: 1722: 1718: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1661: 1654: 1653: 1616: 1574: 1565: 1560: 1557: 1519: 1512: 1393: 1386: 1385: 1372: 1315: 1272: 1237: 1230: 1229: 1213: 1201: 1100: 1092: 1074: 1059: 1037: 1026: 1004: 986: 944: 916: 825: 824: 769: 747: 717: 703: 681: 628: 626: 613: 608: 602: 595: 594: 589: 588: 583: 566: 546: 544: 531: 523: 516: 515: 427: 411: 386: 366: 342: 317: 295: 258: 236: 222: 200: 179: 148: 126: 117:promotional. -- 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3341: 3340: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3319:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3311: 3288: 3274: 3238: 3200: 3184: 3182:for a bit now. 3176: 3156: 3151: 3130: 3090: 3050: 2972: 2967: 2946: 2930:174.254.176.212 2923: 2917: 2848: 2829: 2816: 2813: 2808: 2803: 2783: 2778: 2772: 2768: 2766:You've got mail 2762: 2754: 2746: 2743: 2732: 2710: 2693: 2659: 2629: 2613: 2582: 2551: 2534: 2491: 2471: 2433: 2416: 2406: 2391: 2377: 2339: 2296: 2280: 2250: 2218: 2189: 2171: 2131: 2086: 2067: 2041: 2011: 1982: 1969: 1954:Ashbeckjonathan 1944:to the article 1906:Matt Vasgersian 1890: 1867: 1831: 1808: 1792: 1741:so I could use 1734: 1716: 1714: 1709: 1701: 1652: 1632: 1614: 1582:. As discussed 1575: 1561: 1558: 1553: 1551: 1529: 1517: 1510: 1501: 1470: 1451: 1424: 1384: 1370: 1362:Wikiproject Law 1313: 1290: 1270: 1228: 1211: 1202: 1195: 1162: 1142: 1123: 1099:|type=college}} 1094: 1086: 1072: 1038: 1033: 1005: 1000: 984: 959: 942: 933: 914: 884: 860: 822: 819: 799: 776: 748: 729: 715: 682: 644:Hi Tokyogirl79! 641: 636:Shelmikedmu - 622: 614: 604: 600: 592: 591: 586: 585: 584:and remove the 564: 562: 540: 532: 514: 479: 449: 435: 425: 409: 394: 384: 380: 364: 340: 327: 296: 291: 268: 237: 232: 201: 197:London Marathon 193: 177: 127: 114: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3339: 3337: 3310: 3307: 3296:David Eppstein 3292:Xavier Ramirez 3287: 3286:Xavier Ramirez 3284: 3283: 3282: 3237: 3234: 3199: 3196: 3175: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3118: 3117: 3098: 3059: 3058: 2945: 2942: 2916: 2913: 2888: 2887: 2864: 2863: 2858: 2847: 2844: 2828: 2825: 2802: 2797: 2753: 2744: 2733:Message added 2731: 2718: 2692: 2689: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2628: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2581: 2578: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2542: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2458: 2432: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2386: 2385: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2348: 2347: 2330: 2329: 2295: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2249: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2227: 2226: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2162: 2140: 2139: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2050: 2049: 2019: 1968: 1965: 1922:Jill Arrington 1889: 1886: 1866: 1859: 1856: 1855: 1841: 1830: 1827: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1733: 1727: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1670: 1669: 1664: 1662: 1651: 1648: 1631: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1603: 1602: 1592:Omer123hussain 1590:. Regards :)-- 1550: 1530: 1528: 1525: 1500: 1497: 1469: 1466: 1450: 1447: 1445: 1423: 1419: 1416: 1415: 1400: 1399: 1394: 1383: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1345:the other book 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1321: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1246: 1245: 1240: 1238: 1227: 1224: 1194: 1181: 1161: 1158: 1141: 1138: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1081: 1080: 1032: 1029: 999: 998:Please explain 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 958: 955: 932: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 883: 880: 865: 864: 856: 855: 836:Sulari Gentill 818: 815: 798: 795: 775: 772: 728: 725: 724: 723: 678: 677: 674: 670: 654: 646: 645: 640: 634: 561: 555: 552: 551: 524: 513: 510: 481:Hi there, I'm 478: 472: 448: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 429: 418: 417: 388: 379: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 326: 320: 290: 287: 285: 273:Heartlandtvfan 267: 261: 231: 228: 226: 208:Peter molduano 192: 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 165: 164: 163: 162: 113: 107: 105: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3338: 3329: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3308: 3306: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3285: 3281: 3278: 3277: 3271: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3251: 3247: 3246: 3241: 3235: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3217: 3214: 3209: 3205: 3197: 3195: 3194: 3191: 3189: 3187: 3181: 3174: 3171: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3154: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3137: 3134: 3133: 3127: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3099: 3097: 3094: 3093: 3087: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3057: 3054: 3053: 3047: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3022: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3001: 3000:Genre warrior 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2980: 2979: 2976: 2975: 2970: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2943: 2941: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2921: 2914: 2912: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2867:Way to go on 2866: 2865: 2862: 2859: 2856: 2851: 2845: 2843: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2826: 2824: 2823: 2819: 2817:FreeRangeFrog 2801: 2798: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2777: 2767: 2759: 2740: 2736: 2729: 2722: 2717: 2716: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2702: 2698: 2690: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2666: 2663: 2662: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2634: 2626: 2620: 2617: 2616: 2610: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2587: 2579: 2577: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2558: 2555: 2554: 2548: 2543: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2531: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2507: 2498: 2495: 2494: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2450: 2448: 2445: 2443: 2440: 2439: 2430: 2424: 2421: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2405: 2401: 2395: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2287: 2284: 2283: 2277: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2247: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2186: 2178: 2175: 2174: 2168: 2163: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2134: 2128: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2107: 2106: 2100: 2096: 2094: 2089: 2083: 2075: 2072: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2059: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2045: 2044: 2038: 2033: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2018: 2015: 2014: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1987: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1974: 1966: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950:his talk page 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1930:Jennifer Hale 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1910:Dick Stockton 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1887: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1834: 1828: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1805: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1789: 1784: 1783: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1732: 1728: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1719: 1705: 1698: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1675:Astral spirit 1672: 1671: 1668: 1665: 1660: 1655: 1649: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1630: 1627: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1556: 1549: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1534: 1526: 1524: 1523: 1520: 1515: 1513: 1506: 1498: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1467: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1448: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1420: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1387: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1373: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1342: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1326: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1299: 1295: 1287: 1281: 1278: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1266: 1265: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1207: 1206:taken care of 1199: 1192: 1185: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1160:Horror story? 1159: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1139: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1120: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1098: 1090: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1069: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 997: 991: 988: 987: 981: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 956: 954: 953: 950: 949: 946: 945: 938: 931: 927: 921: 918: 917: 911: 907: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 894: 890: 881: 879: 878: 874: 870: 862:.<ref: --> 858: 857: 853: 852: 851: 849: 845: 844:edit the page 841: 837: 833: 829: 816: 814: 813: 809: 805: 796: 794: 793: 789: 785: 781: 773: 771: 768: 764: 760: 756: 755:Ngbutterworth 752: 744: 741: 740: 736: 733: 726: 722: 719: 718: 712: 707: 706: 705: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 680:Shelmikedmu 675: 671: 668: 664: 660: 655: 652: 648: 647: 643: 642: 639: 635: 633: 632: 627: 625: 619: 618: 610: 607: 597: 582: 576: 574: 560: 556: 550: 545: 543: 537: 536: 529: 525: 522: 518: 517: 511: 509: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495:WP:REFUND/G13 492: 488: 484: 476: 473: 471: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 446: 438: 434: 433: 428: 422: 421: 420: 419: 416: 413: 412: 406: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 393: 392: 387: 377: 371: 368: 367: 361: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 348: 347: 344: 343: 336: 332: 325: 321: 319: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 288: 286: 283: 282: 278: 274: 266: 262: 260: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 229: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 198: 190: 184: 181: 180: 174: 169: 168: 167: 166: 159: 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 124: 120: 112: 108: 106: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3312: 3289: 3273: 3252: 3248: 3242: 3239: 3212: 3207: 3204:René Moncada 3201: 3185: 3177: 3149: 3129: 3089: 3060: 3049: 3023: 2991: 2981: 2965: 2947: 2924:— Preceding 2918: 2897: 2893: 2891: 2860: 2830: 2804: 2784: 2704: 2694: 2671: 2658: 2638:Ugog Nizdast 2633:Hitomi Yaida 2630: 2612: 2583: 2563: 2550: 2533: 2503: 2490: 2478: 2455: 2451: 2446: 2441: 2434: 2412: 2411: 2376: 2338: 2297: 2279: 2251: 2232:DPRoberts534 2217: 2197:DPRoberts534 2190: 2170: 2155: 2147: 2130: 2112: 2104: 2101: 2097: 2090: 2087: 2084:Myliking SPI 2063: 2062: 2040: 2010: 1978: 1977: 1970: 1934:Curt Menefee 1926:Erin Andrews 1891: 1870: 1868: 1861: 1809: 1791: 1735: 1702: 1666: 1633: 1613: 1573:at any time. 1539: 1538: 1508: 1502: 1499:Suspicion... 1477: 1471: 1455:Secondary123 1452: 1444: 1425: 1396: 1369: 1312: 1291: 1275: 1268: 1262: 1255: 1254: 1250: 1242: 1216: 1209: 1203: 1163: 1143: 1127:Amkilpatrick 1124: 1103:Michaelzeng7 1071: 1039:— Preceding 1034: 1006:— Preceding 1001: 983: 960: 947: 940: 934: 913: 885: 866: 861: 820: 804:Theatremania 800: 780:Life (manga) 777: 749:— Preceding 745: 742: 737: 734: 730: 714: 683:— Preceding 679: 623: 616: 611: 598: 577: 570: 541: 534: 528:Daniel Parry 491:Userfication 480: 457:Daniel Puder 450: 431: 408: 390: 381: 378:Daniel Puder 363: 345: 338: 328: 297:— Preceding 292: 284: 269: 238:— Preceding 233: 225: 202:— Preceding 194: 176: 128:— Preceding 115: 104: 78: 43: 37: 3270:Tokyogirl79 3223:Penwatchdog 3186:I, JethroBT 3157:message me! 3126:Tokyogirl79 3086:Tokyogirl79 3046:Tokyogirl79 2973:message me! 2655:Tokyogirl79 2609:Tokyogirl79 2576:Roksenberg 2547:Tokyogirl79 2530:Tokyogirl79 2521:Roksenberg 2487:Tokyogirl79 2470:Roksenberg 2373:Tokyogirl79 2335:Tokyogirl79 2276:Tokyogirl79 2214:Tokyogirl79 2167:Tokyogirl79 2127:Tokyogirl79 2037:Tokyogirl79 2007:Tokyogirl79 1938:Chris Myers 1918:Laura Okmin 1788:Tokyogirl79 1683:Mark viking 1610:Tokyogirl79 1518:talk to me? 1482:Vejvančický 1426:Please see 1366:Tokyogirl79 1350:this source 1334:Hmm... the 1309:Tokyogirl79 1296:. Thanks. ( 1068:Tokyogirl79 1031:Ok but..... 980:Tokyogirl79 910:Tokyogirl79 889:WillieBlues 826:Hello, I'm 817:August 2013 711:Tokyogirl79 689:Shelmikedmu 405:Tokyogirl79 360:Tokyogirl79 335:followed up 173:Tokyogirl79 36:This is an 3255:Catafalque 3253:Cheers - 2875:. Thanks. 2737:. You can 2566:Roksenberg 2511:Roksenberg 2460:Roksenberg 1569:. You can 1507:? Cheers, 1421:CSD--: --> 1045:Goldrawer7 869:BracketBot 828:BracketBot 593:{{db-g13}} 587:{{db-afc}} 499:HasteurBot 483:HasteurBot 455:about the 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 11 85:Archive 10 3103:talk page 3010:. Thanks 3008:WP:ALBUMS 2996:WP Policy 2988:talk page 2902:Arxiloxos 2833:1982vdven 2827:Thank You 2781:template. 2586:talk page 2413:Jezebel's 2258:George Ho 2064:Jezebel's 1999:talk page 1979:Jezebel's 1973:this page 1942:Jim Nantz 1914:Sam Rosen 1888:Vandalism 1511:Jimfbleak 1505:super-mop 1440:AfD": --> 1341:this book 1336:HedgeWeek 1012:Impresumi 832:your edit 606:this link 573:Jesusween 559:Jesusween 79:Archive 9 73:Archive 8 68:Archive 7 60:Archive 5 3180:WP:ANRFC 2950:Acid Rap 2944:Acid Rap 2926:unsigned 2800:Ozu Abam 2786:Esw01407 2678:Gliesian 2676:Thanks, 2479:The Whip 2093:Myliking 1875:Mthwaite 1490:contribs 1358:WP:ITALY 1354:this one 1271:Schmidt, 1212:Schmidt, 1196:You can 1097:Atschool 1053:contribs 1041:unsigned 1020:contribs 1008:unsigned 943:Schmidt, 867:Thanks, 784:Sunuraju 763:contribs 751:unsigned 697:contribs 685:unsigned 461:SQGibbon 341:SCHMIDT, 329:Over at 311:contribs 299:unsigned 252:contribs 240:unsigned 216:contribs 204:unsigned 142:contribs 130:unsigned 3275:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3131:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3107:Ben0kto 3091:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3071:Ben0kto 3051:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3030:Ben0kto 3012:Ben0kto 2660:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2614:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2552:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2535:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2492:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2378:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2340:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2281:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2219:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2172:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2132:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2058:offline 2042:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2012:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1902:KSAT-TV 1845:xkbot32 1816:Ppt1973 1793:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1772:Shirt58 1755:Shirt58 1743:DJ Clay 1615:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1541:Namaste 1405:Tinton5 1371:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1343:and in 1314:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1170:Peridon 1147:Gleaman 1121:Thanks! 1073:(｡◕‿◕｡) 985:(｡◕‿◕｡) 963:Visokor 915:(｡◕‿◕｡) 716:(｡◕‿◕｡) 477:concern 410:(｡◕‿◕｡) 365:(｡◕‿◕｡) 303:Ryan889 244:Ryan889 178:(｡◕‿◕｡) 134:Sshaked 119:Sshaked 39:archive 3208:actual 3152:STATic 2992:anyone 2968:STATic 2877:Drmies 2706:Graham 2355:Mabalu 2319:Mabalu 2304:Mabalu 2212:Done! 2003:WP:NOT 1940:, and 1729:About 1717:Begoon 1679:WP:TNT 1637:Pburka 1588:WP:MOS 1478:|sig=- 1432:Drmies 957:hello? 840:syntax 746:Nick 663:-Link- 659:-Link- 617:SefBau 535:SefBau 453:WT:MMA 447:Thanks 109:inre 3026:moved 2984:genre 2900:. -- 2417:Ponyo 2152:wales 2109:wales 2068:Ponyo 1983:Ponyo 1806:Hello 1563:Dutta 928:inre 322:inre 263:inre 16:< 3323:talk 3300:talk 3259:talk 3227:talk 3111:talk 3075:talk 3067:talk 3034:talk 3016:talk 2934:talk 2906:talk 2898:Ilsa 2881:talk 2871:and 2837:talk 2790:talk 2682:talk 2642:talk 2595:talk 2570:talk 2515:talk 2464:talk 2359:talk 2323:talk 2308:talk 2262:talk 2236:talk 2201:talk 2148:Rich 2105:Rich 1958:talk 1896:and 1879:talk 1849:talk 1820:talk 1776:talk 1759:talk 1745:'s 1687:talk 1641:talk 1596:talk 1584:here 1555:Tito 1486:talk 1474:this 1459:talk 1436:talk 1409:talk 1352:and 1174:talk 1151:talk 1131:talk 1107:talk 1049:talk 1016:talk 967:talk 893:talk 873:talk 808:talk 788:talk 774:Life 759:talk 693:talk 503:talk 465:talk 307:talk 277:talk 248:talk 212:talk 138:talk 123:talk 3213:why 2960:or 2919:FYI 2915:FYI 2776:ygm 2771:or 2444:] 2409:.-- 2404:IRC 1468:FYI 1422:AfD 1360:or 834:to 624:msg 590:or 575:. 542:msg 3325:) 3317:. 3302:) 3261:) 3229:) 3113:) 3105:. 3077:) 3036:) 3018:) 2936:) 2908:) 2883:) 2839:) 2792:) 2779:}} 2773:{{ 2769:}} 2763:{{ 2711:87 2684:) 2644:) 2597:) 2572:) 2517:) 2466:) 2449:] 2361:) 2325:) 2310:) 2264:) 2238:) 2203:) 1960:) 1936:, 1932:, 1928:, 1924:, 1920:, 1916:, 1881:) 1851:) 1822:) 1778:) 1761:) 1689:) 1643:) 1598:) 1514:- 1492:) 1488:/ 1461:) 1438:) 1430:. 1411:) 1208:. 1176:) 1153:) 1133:) 1109:) 1095:{{ 1055:) 1051:• 1022:) 1018:• 969:) 908:. 895:) 875:) 850:. 810:) 790:) 765:) 761:• 699:) 695:• 669:). 620:: 538:: 505:) 467:) 313:) 309:• 279:) 254:) 250:• 218:) 214:• 144:) 140:• 94:→ 64:← 3321:( 3298:( 3257:( 3225:( 3109:( 3073:( 3032:( 3014:( 2932:( 2904:( 2879:( 2835:( 2814:§ 2788:( 2730:. 2680:( 2640:( 2593:( 2568:( 2513:( 2462:( 2396:) 2392:( 2357:( 2321:( 2306:( 2260:( 2234:( 2199:( 1956:( 1877:( 1847:( 1818:( 1774:( 1757:( 1685:( 1639:( 1594:( 1559:☸ 1484:( 1457:( 1434:( 1407:( 1193:. 1172:( 1149:( 1129:( 1105:( 1091:) 1087:( 1047:( 1014:( 965:( 891:( 871:( 806:( 786:( 757:( 691:( 501:( 463:( 305:( 275:( 246:( 210:( 136:( 121:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index