User talk:ReaderofthePack/Archive 25

909:

research. You need to have better sources to back up major claims like that one and claiming that you e-mailed the author is not good enough, as first off, anyone can claim that they've done this and again, you don't know exactly how far the person researched. It could be that their research went only as far as the interview. Out of good faith, I examined the GQ article again. I still did not see any reference to his acting career, so if you're going to say that it's in the article you need to give the exact quote and the page where the quote is located. Saying "it's there" is not good enough, especially in this situation. When it comes to him being a con man, this is extremely relevant, as the nature of his crimes means that we cannot use sources that rely solely or heavily on information supplied by Comisar. If someone is in jail for crimes that rely heavily on someone lying or misrepresenting themselves, we have to assume that there is a high likelihood that they would lie or misrepresent themselves when asked about themselves. When it comes to the claims we need extremely strong sourcing. For example, if you can find a source released by the FBI that official states this then that would work. I'm not going to change my opinion otherwise.

1255:

including Knowledge (XXG). His only contact with the public is through carefully screened US Mail and highly monitored telephone calls. While he is aware of his Knowledge (XXG) page, Steven has not instructed anyone to attempt to make any changes whatsoever. He is fully aware that the content of his page is completely out of his control. Steven has literally millions of fans worldwide. Any of these people can be doing this without his knowledge or consent. While Steven is not yet a known actor, he does in fact have real acting credits. Steven's team consists of very well-established and reputable agents, managers, and lawyers. None of us would attempt to use any unethical means to influence the content of his page." Please post this on the article talk page.

808: 2785:

use an analogy, getting a page on here is a lot like getting a position on a professional sports team. People might might want to join but unless they have what it takes to make the team they'll get eliminated during the tryouts. It might hurt their feelings that they didn't get in, but the team can't take every applicant. It's the same on here - while it'd be nice if we could keep every article, that's not how Knowledge (XXG) works and all articles need to show how the topic passes a particular requirement. (In this case,

1804:

largest differences between a personal paper and an encyclopedia article, since you'd need to put these in a personal paper but not in an encyclopedia article. Again, I don't think that this was your intent, but it is something you need to be careful of, since a lot of people may look at the fact that a large number of the sources do not pertain to the actual film and assume that it's a distraction technique. I'll try to take a look at the article later tonight and clean it up some so you can see what I'm getting at.

3105:

subsection in the part of the article pertaining to his career. It's just that we have to be really careful about BLP stuff in case he wants to say that we're being salacious, which is why we need to be careful on the article's talk page. The media could report on him (possibly) editing the article, but then they could also say that we didn't try to work with him. Knowledge (XXG) is a pretty popular target for the media, after all. In any case, I did note that there are two stories by CBS News,

1232:

editors himself, but there's also the heavy implication here that he's enlisted various other people to harass on his behalf. There would have to be at least another 2-3 sources out there to justify re-adding this content to the article because the resistance here is so incredibly strong. At this point it'd almost be easier for him to argue for the article's removal as opposed to argue for the inclusion of any content about his acting. This is how poorly everything has been handled by his camp.

1011: 466:

point Comisar took it upon himself to send out unsolicited snail mail to people, without first asking if this would be OK. This came across as harassment, especially as he was sent out a large amount of editors to one person. During this time there were also apparently some threats made against one of the editors that was involved with the article. It got so bad at one point that the WMF got involved and contacted at least one of the editors involved,

733:

subsequent version of the article over the past 4 years mentioned his acting until last month. The mention of his acting only became problematic when IMDb was added as an additional reference. One short sentence about his acting, referenced by GQ, at the end of the career section seems reasonable. This in no way implies that he is notable as an actor. This merely reveals the biographical fact that he did some acting. If anyone agrees, please edit.

31: 2288:

where it would likely pass the very low bar of speedy criteria. However since the article was recently created, it'd be best to go through AfD, since a recent creation makes it more likely to be de-PRODed or restored via REFUND. Although of course the best-best outcome would be to contact the article creator and ask if they'd be willing to userfy it until they can provide better sourcing. I'll drop them a line on their userpage.

524:. The issue here is that the article doesn't actually back up the claims of Comisar as an actor. It says that he was on a few talk shows, but that's not considered to be an acting role on Knowledge (XXG). An acting role would be where Comisar was playing someone else, like Johnny Depp portraying Edward Scissorhands, and you need coverage that discusses him in this capacity. Until that can be produced, we have to leave this out. 2490: 318: 1403:

from attempting to add anything to his Knowledge (XXG) page and not make suggestions on any of the Knowledge (XXG) talk pages. Any additions made to the Steve Comisar Knowledge (XXG) page will be made by experienced editors and administrators only. We do not encourage or condone anyone else making additions or comments to this page. Steve Comisar and his entire management team thank you in advance for your cooperation."

591: 1110: 551:

these 2 versions represent a more complete biographical picture of Comisar, please revert or edit as you feel appropriate. His acting career, while not notable in itself, should not be hidden from the public. He is the only famous con man who is also an actor. That's something the public should know. As is, the aticle is biased, one-sided, and non-neutral. Thank you, Amit Mishra, India. You replied here

1469:

kind of wow - he really doesn't get the whole "you need to be forthright" thing. That's what concerns me the most, since I don't know how many of his past mistakes were really legitimate mistakes and how many are him deliberately doing something wrong because that's what he wanted to do and he thought he could lie his way out of it. I'm thinking that it's more the latter than the former, unfortunately.

1516: 425:

other people who edited his page. I do not engage in any dishonest practices. I also live in India. Can you please look at the January 16 edit and if you feel it was fair, please revert it. I think that the editors watching the article have something personal against Comisar and are deleting all edits. By reading their talk pages, they all seem to know each other very well. Amit Mishra, India.

1346: 857: 189: 1085:. It was closed mainly as a hoax, so there's no harm in letting it go back. I primarily see it ending one of two ways: either it's deleted entirely or it's merged into another article. It's possible that it could end otherwise, but I think that it'd need some fairly strong sourcing to show that it's independently notable outside of the main categories of shouta or lolicon. 111:

are blogs, youtube videos, imdb and material that Savage has put out himself. These are very hard to justify as RS, but if someone at a newspaper or perhaps a blog that is considered a "respectable" news source (most newspaper content is online only these days anyway, so the line is very thin), maybe an article could be created for Savage, his movie or the incident itself.

1129:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 201: 1916:

however, about some of the comments being made by the other editor in their edit sums. Not so much for me, but more for them. They do seem to be trying to exert some ownership over the article which is probably going to end badly for them. Anyway, if you have any comments on what I added to the article's talk page, then please add them. --

509:

either. The basic consensus with the article is that Comisar is trying to use it in order to rehabilitate his image and right now there will be pushback to any addition of his acting career. I'd actually go so far as to say that the reason why there's opposition to adding even a one line sentence is because of the past history of the article.

2789:.) This isn't cyber bullying, it's just the rules on Knowledge (XXG). Now what I recommended to you on the other pages I'll repeat here: I would recommend that you try making your own wiki on a site like Wikia, since they don't have the very strict rules and requirements that Knowledge (XXG) does. I would also recommend that you be very, 478:, IMDb, or YouTube. There was also concern that Comisar's roles were so incredibly minor that they wouldn't be considered major enough to warrant inclusion in the article, as there was concern that these were minor walk on roles with no lines. It's actually quite common for Knowledge (XXG) to not include information about trivial roles. 649:, thank you for your quick reply. I understand it may seem there is a COI here as I have an external relationship to start.me. Still, that does not warrant speedy deletion citing A7. I believe my article about start.me is neutral. I consider myself an expert on the field and have written articles about similar services (e.g. 2858:

works. Bite is more for cases where someone is far more harsh than is warranted. Deleting pages isn't really being harsh, not if the page genuinely falls under deletion criteria. In this case the article was nominated for speedy deletion because it was redundant to an existing article on the product,

2528:

As you had originally offered to help with editing, a colleague of mine and I emailed you multiple times last week indicating we would like to address these concerns and requesting help in appropriately doing so. Of the three attempts, you responded once, and only to the potential copyright concerns.

2436:

2287:

Where would it be moved to? Or would it just be outright deleted? If it's an outright deletion then you could either propose it for deletion or take it to AfD. Since it's a championship it's possible that it could be restored if it was contested, since championships do infer just enough notability to

1308:

Maybe you should just put a big sign above the article that says, "Nothing can be added to this article because Comisar is a con man." The one proposed sentence about his acting was merely to add a biographical fact about him. It is perfectly appropriate and is done all the time in other articles. It

1304:

Comisar is in prison and can't manipulate the article. You saw the statement from his handlers. Your assertion that any edit or suggestion to the article must have been initiated by Comisar is totally preposterous. His acting is now reliably sourced, and should not be concealed from the article. This

1300:

This will also be my last posting until Mr. Comisar has been released and gained more media recognition as a notable actor. So, let me get this straight. You confirmed that the GQ article actually contains an acting reference but you still won't add it to the Comisar article because he is a known con

891:

Can you give me the exact quote from the article? When I read the article it mentioned his time on several talk shows, but not any of the films he was supposedly in. If it's in there, it was so brief that I didn't see it. So far anyone lobbying for this person has only stated "it's in the source" but

780:

made the claims. We cannot accept his say-so on something like this, especially as he has a very long history of conning people to get what he wants - it's the whole reason he's in jail right now. If you had a source from the FBI itself, that'd be different. Now the interview does have him mentioning

2784:

To the young authors: I'm sorry that your feelings were hurt by the article's deletion, but you've got to understand that Knowledge (XXG) is not like Wikia or other sites on the Internet. In order to have a page the series would need to be considered very notable per Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines. To

1254:

We are done making suggestions for the Comisar article. We will take your advice and wait until he is released. I did, however, contact his management team and this what they said: "Steven Comisar has been in federal prison for the past 14 years. He has absolutely no access to email or the internet,

742:

I also strongly disagree that the Observer piece is not a reliable source. It was not an opinion piece, and it was not from a blog. It was an investigative article from the actual New York Observer newspaper, a very reliable source. (see their Knowledge (XXG) page) I'd ask that you please reconsider

709:

It's a tricky situation. I'm going to shoot you an email about this, since I don't entirely feel comfortable talking about this in specific, given what the editor is going through if I read the situation correctly. It's why I'm kind of trying to give him a bit more leeway, as it explains his actions

110:

I only learned of the incident after the fact. I go to IHE occasionally, so I didn't see any of the videos when they came out, but reviewed the situation when it was over. I am sure that many people will come to wikipedia looking for information on Savage, and the incident, but so far all I can find

2452:

With guidance, I am willing to work to improve the page in the future. If you would like to do so then please reach out to me using the email address I have already provided you as I will shortly be deleting this username in a final effort to respond to the potential conflict of interest concerns.

1874:

I'll try to take a look at it later. Offhand I can see one thing that needs to be removed: the Readers' Favorite award. A quick look at the website for that organization shows that it's a vanity award, as they offer authors marketing services. It's actually listed at the vanity awards entry here on

1798:

part of the museum. I also have to repeat that the sources that do not pertain to the movie do not really add anything to the article and I don't think that the average reader will really have any true issue with establishing that a theater performance was held and Atherton attended. If they're not

1468:

he was caught, but he continued to try to pull one over on everyone. Then when he was given the option of a standard offer, he continued to bluster... and then started chomping at it once he realized that he wasn't doing himself any favors. Then he was reticent when naming his sockpuppets, which is

1402:

After reading your last post, Comisar's management team adds the following to be posted on the article talk page. I think it will help make things more clear. "To clarify the statement in our disclaimer, Mr. Comisar, and his management team, asks the friends, fans, and supporters of him to refrain

1231:

Thank you for pointing out the specific quote. I did find it and this was my mistake. However we would still need to have more coverage to show that this would warrant a mention, given the history with the article. Comisar pretty much poisoned the well here because not only has he harassed multiple

1064:

You're correct in that it doesn't seem to be a hoax, but it does seem to be a neologism that isn't in very common use. I can restore it and send it back to AfD, but I don't know that this would necessarily survive given the extremely small amount of sourcing that's out there in places that could be

1048:

You preemptively closed it as a hoax just two and a half hours after it was listed? Google Scholar turns up a (very small) number of viable sources, Bing reports four hundred million results. The Scholar hits are very thin, and trying to find RS in the general hits would be a long ugly slog through

771:

I'm going to repeat what I wrote above about the GQ article: The article doesn't actually back up the claims of Comisar as an actor. It says that he was on a few talk shows, but that's not considered to be an acting role on Knowledge (XXG). An acting role would be where Comisar was playing someone

550:

Thank you for replying to me. I will never again attempt to edit Comisar. I do, however, respectfully request that as someone who obviously cares about the Knowledge (XXG) encyclopedia, you please take a look at the November 22, and the January 16 versions of the article. If you feel that either of

512:

During this time you should only post on the talk page of the article with sourcing. The best sourcing to use would be something that focuses on Comisar as an actor. Primary sources, IMDb links, YT, and similar will not count as reliable sources in this case. Passing mentions can help somewhat, but

508:

Now that said, the question here is what can be done with the article. First and foremost, I would recommend that you not make any direct edits to the article page and if you're in contact with Comisar or anyone else involved with this, I'd also recommend that you tell them not to make direct edits

473:

One of the biggest things that people tried to add to the article was that Comisar was an actor. This was removed with a request for proof and the only proof provided was IMDb and clips on YouTube, neither of which are enough in and of themselves to prove that someone is an actor. With IMDb, anyone

2793:

careful about what you put on the Internet. If I remember correctly, you gave out a lot of personal information that could lead someone to find where you live. Most people are good and wouldn't do anything bad with this, but because there are bad people out there, you need to be more cautious with

2747:

Hi Tokyogirl79, I see you have criticized this user's hard work of making the articles they have made and edited. By doing this you are what is known as a cyber bully. This is not nice to people and can hurt people's feelings. I recommend that you apologize to this user. Thanks, YoutubeAuthor. The

2544:

With guidance, I am willing to work to improve the page in the future. If you would like to do so then please reach out to me using the email address I have already provided you as I or any other editor will no longer be using this username in a final effort to respond to the potential conflict of

1561:

Hello TG79 I have been working on expanding articles on horror films and have been focused on expanding one such article. The problem is the scope of the article makes it so that I cannot do it alone. I was wondering if you would be willing to collaborate with me on expanding this article. Here is

1317:

this is happening, both on my talk page and on the article's talk page. One source is not enough in this situation, especially given the harassment that has occurred in the past concerning that article. Even if I was inclined to add the information, there would need to be a consensus at this point

755:

I completely agree with everything else that all of the other editors had to say about this article. A big heartfelt thanks to @Tokyogirl79, @DanielRigal, @LjL, and @Onel5969, for educating me on the Knowledge (XXG) editing process. You all seem like very intelligent, dedicated, and decent people.

908:

As far as the top ten claim goes, the Observer article links to the interview from Comisar. The common thing for articles is that if someone takes info from somewhere, they cite the source. This means that the author pulled the claim from the interview and that might have been the extent of their

424:

I noticed you were an admin person involved with the Steve Comisar article. I am having a problem understanding why the January 16 edit was deleted. It was completely fair and reliably sourced. You also temporarily blocked my account for COI and puppet issues. I do not know Comisar or any of the

149:

I heard about this after the fact as well. It'd be interesting if we could have an article about him, but offhand the notability here is too slim to warrant having a page under these circumstances. He's prime trolling material, after all. Not quite up to CWC standards, but he's still a target and

1803:

the article, as it can be seen as an attempt to make it appear less notable. This is because we've had people try to establish notability for an article by inserting numerous citations in the hopes that a large number of citations will make something seem more important. It's probably one of the

1277:

I've posted the comment, but please be aware that this can be construed as you saying that the fans will try to make these same edits or that you'd ask them to make them. Regardless of whether or not either is the case, please be aware that at this point any attempts to re-add the information by

465:

Comisar's article has a history of people coming on and trying to push a specific version of the article. The man himself made some of these edits and there have been accounts that, if not Comisar himself, were people that he clearly asked or paid to come and edit the article themselves. At some

251:

I guess that was inappropriate, and I'm sorry if I made anyone feel uncomfortable. Its just that time of the year between Christmas and when things get going again in mid-January when one gets bored and lonely, and after hours of just killing time on wikipedia I thought "What the heck? She seems

3088:

I want to thank you for taking such a calm and rational approach to this edit war. I was wondering now that this story has been covered not only by the original website, but also by the New York Times, New York Daily News, National Public Radio, CBS Evening News, and around the world in Mexico,

1491:

Thank you for changing my draft into a decent article. I haven't had a decent internet access for more than 5 minutes since mid 2015 and haven't been able to access the page long enough to make the needed changes before my ancient laptop crashed. Please delete the draft and keep the article you

2027:

It would be worth a try. Right now one of the biggest concerns was that there was really only enough to justify one article, as the coverage for Wicks was a little light overall. That's mildly a problem, since establishing independent notability for the book might put the main article at risk,

1854:

by the article's creator. Anyway, I don't want to "bite" anyone or drive anyone away from Knowledge (XXG) and of course I am not saying my edits were mistake free, so perhaps a new perspective from someone more experienced at editing would be helpful in improving the article and preventing the

1208:

Hello @Tokyogirl79: I found Comisar's acting claims in the GQ article, page 156, second paragraph. It says: "Comisar will now make money the legitimate, old fashioned way, by acting. . .He landed a role in the movie, Tough Luck, playing the boyfriend of all things, a femme fatale con artist. .

781:

his acting career, however we cannot accept that for the same reasons: it's coming from Comisar, who should be viewed as an unreliable source concerning himself because as someone convicted of lying/conning people, we have to assume that there's a chance he could be lying during the interview.

3104:

I'd say to start small for now and build as we get more coverage. If this account is Parker, which does appear likely, I don't want him to complain about BLP violations. The coverage has been mild but steady enough to warrant mention and if it keeps going the way it has, it'd at least merit a

1915:

Thank you for taking a look Tokyogirl79. In hindsight, my edit sums may have been a little confusing since I left only wikilinks without going into too much detail. So, I have posted some things on the article's talk page which might help clarify the changes I made. I am a little concerned,

3052:

I wanted to thank you for protecting the Timothy Parker page. In the crossword world, this is a huge deal, (It's like if a baseball team were caught throwing games, imagine the outrage). The allegations are undeniable when presented with the facts, and his use of pseudonyms and other general

732:

The GQ article is a reliable source. It was an investigative piece written by Sabrina Erdely, an award-winning journalist. (see her Knowledge (XXG) page) The article clearly references Comisar's acting. GQ was used to reference Comisar's acting in the very first version of the article. Every

2867:". Since there are no other products that use this line, there's really no need for a title that specifies that it's a slogan used in a commercial. In any case, be careful when using the term "bite" on here, because using the term when there's really no "biting" can be seen as an 1309:

was in no way to imply that he is a notable actor or has a major acting career. Con man or not, Comisar's acting is backed by a reliable source, by your own admission, and the one sentence should be added for biographical purposes only. This is not just one person's opinion.

474:

can edit and add material, and in the past we've had cases where people managed to add things to IMDb that were provably false. Since Comisar has a history of being a con artist and there has been so much trouble with the article, it's reasonable to ask for proof that isn't

1446:

It's strange how they seem to believe that bluff and bluster is likely to win the day. It was the same when they accused me of rudeness. I can be very rude under the right circumstances. I can destroy them with words. But I have not yet stopped so low here to anyone.

3162:

Just to give you a heads up I have worked with another user NRP (NinjaRobotPirate) and have expanded the lead in the User Draft. There is only a couple of things that still need to be worked on and added. Here is a list of the things that still need to be worked on:

1168: 3070:

No problem - I am concerned about that as well. I've blocked the main editor for a short period of time and asked him to start collaborating on the talk page, since he kept making some problematic edits and wasn't responding to direct questions about his COI.

1799:

aware of the actual things being posted, you can always link to the Knowledge (XXG) article, if it exists. Also while I know that this was not your intent, linking to sources that don't pertain to the article (ie, cannot show notability) can actually work

363:, but I believe that all the previous issues have been addressed this time. The false claim about him being #86 on the overall Billboard chart is gone, the tone is no longer promotional, and I think notability has been demonstrated in accordance with 2036:, since I think that there's likely a conflict of interest here. (IE, you know Wicks and/or were asked to make the article.) You can still edit with a conflict of interest, you just have to be as careful as possible during the whole editing process. 2005:. I will try to find more information about the book. If I find more sources would it be enough for resubmitting my article? This was my first article and your points about it would be very helpful for future articles. I will count them for now. -- 2348:

Hi. Just sort of curious why you removed the G13 tag from a test draft which has only a single line of content and no evidence of notability? Not a big thing, but I try not to make work for other editors, so I was wondering if I missed something?

825: 772:

else, like Johnny Depp portraying Edward Scissorhands, and you need coverage that discusses him in this capacity. Until that can be produced, we have to leave this out. As far as the claims of Comisar being ranked, the Observer article references

484:

You mentioned that I blocked your account at one point. I cannot see where I've blocked you or where any other admin have blocked you. What account are you talking about? If you do have another account then you will need to be transparent about

1065:

considered a RS. Saying that there are search hits on Google/Bing doesn't necessarily mean that they're usable. Offhand a quick look brings up predominantly junk hits, so even if the hoax part isn't accurate it does seem like it's a neologism.

886:

Comisar has no control of what goes into the article. The article is referenced by sources independent from him. The fact that he is a liar or scam artist is irrelevant here. We should focus on the Comisar "article" and not Comisar the person.

3139:

Hello TokyoGirl79. Just to let you know I have replied to your comment in the Userspace draft that we are working on. You might want to check that out. Also please add your name to the project in the collaboration of the month on WikiProject

1278:

anyone will come across as the management team or Comisar asking them to make them. If you do see them trying to do this, the kindest thing you can do for Comisar is to ask for them to leave the Knowledge (XXG) page alone for the time being.

1598:

Well, for starters I need citations for the unsourced material, I a working on doing other things for the article but also also need someone to focus on adding ore information on the film's reception. Just reply on my talk page and let me

879:

The GQ article most definitely mentions Comisar's acting. Please read the entire article again. When you find the acting claim, can you admit you were wrong and add the suggested sentence to the end of the career section? Please be fair.

2028:

although hopefully by that point there would be enough coverage overall to justify two articles, so there's no reason to really worry about that now. I'd say that a good idea would be to work on a copy of the article in your userspace at

2532:

In regards to your advice regarding the potential copyright concerns, I submitted a ticket for use of copyrighted language, as you suggested, a week ago, yet I have seen no change regarding the copyright notice on the page.

2440:

2540:

With no further advice for moving forward, I have removed any potentially disruptive content—essentially everything but the introduction—from the page in the hope that the notices would at least be removed promptly.

2448:

290:

I have been a "fan" of chick tract for awhile now. It surprises me that they actually got Jack Chicks permission to make their movie, which appears to be available in 4 "episodes" on YouTube. I'll check it

2208:

I actually just did a delete/move, so they're at their proper titles. A quick search shows that they do capitalize the B in their name, so it wouldn't be controversial at all. I think that this would be a

1831: 2524:

I appreciate your bringing forward concerns regarding recent edits of The Washington Papers page. However, in trying to appropriately address those concerns, I have found the response less enthusiastic.

2432:

1442:

I do not see, now, this editor to be in the position where they may own up, apologise and undertake until they have cooled their help for a bit. The block is preventative here. It prevents putative harm.

2536:

At this time, despite numerous attempts to respond directly to the concerns raised, we are frustrated our efforts have not been acknowledged, and thus in turn, the notices on the page have not changed.

2444:

367:

through two rankings on the Top R&B/Hip Hop Albums chart. If you agree that the article passes muster, the only step remaining is to move it to the style-conforming title with the lower-case "r".

1765:

The references to things contained within the film are there as an aid to the reader, as unless you're from London many of these things would be unknown. They are not there to establish notability.

1082: 2986:

The page is declined since the overall notability is still in question. The page is recommended for AfD, but it is not in the March 4 to March 7 log. I want to contest the deletion recommendation.

1410: 1649:

Dear Tokyogirl79, tank you for taking the time to message me and thorough information. And your kindness. Your quality work, detached openness and sagacity is most inspiring to me, as a beginner.

2943:

based on the report over the editor repeated re-creation and restoring the deleted article and vandalize of other editor's user pages. Now the IP has restored the article back to the talk page. —

488:

You have really only edited Comisar's article, which leads me to believe that you are someone that he has asked to edit the article. If this is the case, you need to divulge this information per

883:

The top ten con men claim in the Observer article was not a reference from an interview with Comisar. The claim was independently investigated by the writer. I just emailed him and he told me.

2691:

Ah - I picked the wrong one in the scroll down list, it was meant to be deleted as G11! I've restored and then deleted it with the correct tags, although I doubt that anyone will question it.

1607:) 00:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC) I do have a userspace draft already created so don't do anything on the actual page. Also remember to add yourself in the WikiProject Horror collaboration page-- 1216: 2616:. I hope it's normal if you counterreply there. I don't know if I have to update here each time I update there to let you have a notification of the update. I've updated the issue also here: 3012: 1630:

We are currently building stubs for women warriors who died in Feb and will, by the end of the semester, be building full pages on female warriors. Again, I appreciate your assistance.

746:"The FBI has ranked Comisar in the top ten con men of all time, second only to Frank Abagnale, the subject of the motion picture, Catch Me if You Can, directed by Steven Spielberg." 2936: 2502:

Hi there! Thanks for saying hi, we are a class in Berkeley trying to add LGBTQ content to Knowledge (XXG), students are excited and so am I. BTW--I think Librarians rock!

503:? I didn't see where you made any edits to the article around the 16th, but I see where he did. The article has a history of sockpuppetry, so this will need to be answered. 3114: 2757: 694:

Oh I forgot to tell that Piyushratnu contacted me over email, Facebook also. I could not reply anywhere because of my hectic work-schedule and too many pending tasks. --

1856: 1439:

is a powerful tool, and it's not hard for an admin with a bulk undo tool to remove any intermediate ordure. Yet it might be seen as setting a precedent for others.

3027:

I've given him a short block for edit warring and for not responding to concerns. Beyond that we'll have to see if he's willing to collaborate over the article.

2964:

I've blocked them for a week and revoked talk page access. We may want to see if we can get the artist's name on an article creation blacklist if this keeps up.

2104: 1839: 1429:

It annoys me when someone thinks they have fooled me into thinking that they have hair. "That man thinks I am stupid, He thinks that I think that he has hair!"

513:

what you really need right now are things that would firmly establish that he was an actor and that it'd be worth at least mentioning in passing in the article.

1209:.Producer Josh Etting said, "You know, he's not a bad actor." I guess now you can add this to the article and correct your mistake about it not being there. 1855:

situation from spriring out of control. For the record, I came to the article because some non-free cover art uploaded by the editor was being discussed at

2707:

That's what I assumed, no harm done. Just seemed to be strange for the spam-only account to be attacking the organization it was trying to promote :)

2469: 815: 481:

Before I get into what can be done about getting the content added to the article, I first have some questions/concerns that you will need to answer.

1730:

A couple of points, in your comments you asked me to provide evidence that the film has been taken into the Museum of London collection permanently.

1141: 2241: 1697: 3089:

Australia, and Switzerland, if this scandal, which likely constitutes nearly all of the the traffic to his page, should have a separate section.

2567:

Hi! I'll drop a message on your userpage! I haven't been really good about getting onto Knowledge (XXG) the past week or two because of classes.

2126:

I figured that they had to be a prior editor, but wasn't familiar with their editing pattern. I'm sorry that you have to go through all of this,

2825: 1354:

Message added 11:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

950: 3005:

How is it that Arcenter (who seems to have created his own page in the first place) is allowed to continue editing his own page willy-nilly?

757: 1224: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2367: 3148:) 16:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Have an idea for expanding the article. I'll let you know more about it on the Userspave Draft talk page-- 2067: 1121: 2071: 2059: 1739:

Which clearly states "We are continually adding new objects to our collections and here we present some of our more recent arrivals..."

1742:

I am unclear what more evidence you would require, especially as you say this would probably establish the films notability in itself?

1414: 814:

CIS-A2K is going to organize an edit-a-thon between 25 and 31 January this year. The aim of this edit-a-thon is creating and improving

1688: 892:

they don't actually quote the part of the source that backs up the claims. If you want to get it added, you need to be more specific.

623:

No problem. I wish that it hadn't had to go to this. In your defense, I do think I could have explained this better in a briefer way.

2324:

Huh. I thought that we had a general racing one. This looks to be a motorbike competition, so that limits what we can go to offhand.

2074:, naming these accounts and others; the "brand-new" editor who created them makes some weird claims and it's all rather peculiar. -- 1220: 3106: 3016: 2063: 1679: 1262: 2995: 2898: 2821: 2370:. I figure that if they don't edit it, it'll just get deleted again and then it'd be extremely difficult for it to get restored. 2255: 2179: 2954: 2875:

from other editors on here since going in and assuming that something was done out of bad faith can backfire pretty solidly.

2864: 570: 441: 2098: 1125:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 750: 1627: 2550: 2529:

We still have yet to receive response or acknowledgement from you regarding the language you thought may be too positive.

2465: 2437:

We still have yet to receive response or acknowledgement from you regarding the language you thought may be too positive.

2081: 1734: 1130: 773: 194: 1705: 460:

I'm re-writing this all for clarity because the Comisar situation is very complicated. Here's the gist of the situation:

2029: 2165: 2157: 1626:

I wanted to thank you for watching over wikipedia and providing feedback. I'd like to encourage you to watch over my

603:

Thankyou for your, time, advice and help. I very much appreciate you getting the article on the 'main space'. Cheers,

2829: 1492:

created up and running instead. So sorry - and thank you again for your work on the Necronomicon Providence article.

3110: 2058:

Thanks for blocking Bonadeaeaea and the other lookalikes. I'm frankly a bit baffled - there are attempts at SPIs at

2342: 946: 863: 38: 1850:, but I'm having a hard time finding any sources. I've tried doing a bit of good-faith cleanup, but it seems this 2863:, and articles on products should be under the product name. We also already had a redirect based on the slogan " 1364: 761: 296: 257: 123: 47: 17: 2620:, since I thought it was clearer to write there and also to let know my probable "last words" to SwisterTwister. 807: 2617: 1750: 1186:. It looked a little suspicious to me but I didn't have the time to put into it. Appreciate your work! Cheers, 335: 215: 2461: 445: 2613: 657:). The field of start pages is rather small and apart from me there are few Wikipedians willing to document. 3199: 3153: 3145: 2940: 2660: 2304:

I'll also ask for help with the racing WikiProject. That way if it isn't notable, then we can say that some

1612: 1604: 1571: 1497: 3008: 2457: 1835: 1406: 1392: 1266: 1258: 1212: 942: 938: 558: 500: 429: 2410:

Eh, it's cool. I have to admit, if they didn't have the section headings I probably would've declined it.

662: 2868: 1318:

about adding the information into the article and at this point the consensus would most assuredly be to

979:

How do i send you an email? Could not find your address I want to send you some of the article clipping.

360: 3121: 3094: 3075: 3060: 3031: 2968: 2917: 2879: 2798: 2729: 2695: 2571: 2414: 2374: 2328: 2312: 2292: 2217: 2152:

Hi, I don't know what CSD rationale I use to do this so I contacted you directly. Can you please delete

2134: 2040: 2002: 1983: 1899: 1879: 1808: 1783: 1673: 1654: 1585: 1543: 1493: 1473: 1326: 1282: 1236: 1089: 1069: 1049:

mud, but with hundreds of millions of general hits it's implausible that there aren't more RS in there.

966: 913: 896: 785: 714: 676: 627: 528: 386: 274: 233: 174: 154: 137: 3090: 3056: 1895:

Ah, it's a review, not an award. Same problem still remains: you pay for their services, ultimately..

1843: 1832:

Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive233#Nikki and John Pranksters in Love

2991: 2641: 2633: 2625: 1769: 1028: 1024: 992: 988: 984: 980: 736:"Comisar had supporting acting roles in several motion pictures, television shows, and commercials." 407: 372: 292: 253: 170:. I wrote an article about this via a request and ended up purchasing it. Well worth the $ 5 so far. 167: 119: 2760:

has been filed. Feel free to delete this if you want. Enjoy the rest of your week in spite of this.

2022: 2006: 475: 2906: 2837: 2765: 2713: 2680: 2261: 2185: 2010: 1969: 1939: 1921: 1864: 1851: 1635: 1388: 838: 699: 605: 356: 349: 331: 210: 2305: 364: 3195: 3149: 3141: 2950: 2656: 2598: 1608: 1600: 1567: 1563: 1453: 609: 566: 437: 2786: 1931: 521: 3172:

An image of Sharon Springs, New York where it was filmed with the appropriate caption included.

1010: 3203: 3157: 3128: 3098: 3082: 3064: 3038: 3020: 2975: 2958: 2924: 2886: 2841: 2805: 2768: 2736: 2718: 2702: 2685: 2664: 2645: 2602: 2578: 2562: 2511: 2507: 2473: 2421: 2401: 2381: 2360: 2335: 2319: 2299: 2271: 2224: 2195: 2141: 2117: 2088: 2084: 2047: 2014: 1990: 1973: 1943: 1925: 1906: 1886: 1868: 1815: 1787: 1658: 1639: 1616: 1592: 1575: 1550: 1530: 1501: 1480: 1458: 1418: 1333: 1289: 1270: 1243: 1195: 1191: 1153: 1096: 1076: 1058: 1032: 996: 973: 954: 920: 903: 866: 842: 792: 765: 721: 703: 683: 666: 658: 634: 613: 574: 535: 411: 393: 376: 339: 300: 281: 261: 240: 220: 181: 161: 144: 127: 2855: 1857:

Knowledge (XXG):Files for discussion/2016 January 11#File:Fragments of her identity book.jpeg

1827: 1436: 3118: 3072: 3028: 2965: 2914: 2876: 2795: 2753: 2726: 2692: 2568: 2558: 2411: 2371: 2325: 2309: 2289: 2235: 2214: 2131: 2037: 1980: 1896: 1876: 1805: 1779: 1669: 1650: 1582: 1540: 1526: 1470: 1464:

That's what really got me with all of this. It was pretty obvious that he was caught and he

1323: 1279: 1233: 1183: 1086: 1066: 963: 910: 893: 782: 711: 673: 646: 624: 547: 525: 383: 271: 230: 171: 151: 134: 3167:

Quotebox needs to be added somewhere in the article (preferably in the production section).

2872: 2033: 1847: 489: 2987: 2637: 2629: 2621: 2161: 2153: 1754: 1149: 1054: 403: 368: 2210: 1126: 114:

So, BTW, I see you are a female wikipedian who loves horror movies. You wouldn't be like

2489: 1826:

Hi Tokyogirl79. A while back you were very helpful in answering some questions I had at

751:

http://observer.com/2015/11/how-watching-mr-robot-made-me-paranoid-about-getting-hacked/

317: 2902: 2849: 2833: 2761: 2708: 2675: 2282: 2247: 2203: 2171: 2115: 1965: 1935: 1917: 1860: 1631: 1384: 834: 695: 590: 1735:

http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/london-wall/whats-on/exhibitions-displays/show-space/

1305:

is very biased and not in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy. (See WP:NEUTRALITY)

1167: 826:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India/Events/Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon

3187:

Release section needs more information (how much money did it gross, and popularity).

2945: 2594: 2590: 2391: 2350: 1746: 1448: 562: 455: 433: 206: 115: 1566:

P.S. Please let me know if you are willing to collaborate with me on this article.--

229:

I suppose I should've chastised him, but I admit that I had to admire his chutzpah.

3117:

reported on it, but I'm not sure if this is a RS per Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines.

2503: 2127: 2076: 1515: 1374: 1187: 2593:. They were much appreciated because they have improved the article quite a bit. 2655:

Please read the talk page for User:Paleface Jack I Drink Your Blood (revision).--

2130:. I only had this happen once so far (now I've jinxed myself) and it wasn't fun. 2554: 1522: 467: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1145: 1050: 856: 209:? (see his userpage). Thanks for the amusement as it certainly made me laugh, 2108: 931:

I've sent you an email. I hope this is the correct way of letting you know.

1103:

Orphaned non-free image File:Strange Fruit Lillian Smith 1944 Paperback.jpg

553:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Maniamit#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest

1930:

Hi again Tokyogirl79. Just wanted to let you know that I mentioned you in

1794:

The link shows that it was displayed, but doesn't establish that it was a

1768:

I have followed Atherton's career closely, as I was hugely impressed with

1045:

I just stumbled across a puzzling close that you might want to reconsider.

2725:

Thanks for giving me the head's up - it is kind of funny to see it, tbh.

1934:

with regards to the above-mentioned talk page post and your response. --

654: 118:, right?;)(I hope that statement is not against Knowledge (XXG) policy)-- 2366:

I hesitated at it as well, but someone had requested its restoration at

2775:

Nah, I'll leave it up in the hopes that he may come back and read this:

330:

Thank you for being so generous with your time, and for your clarity.

3053:

shadiness was extending into an edit war. Thank you for stopping that

2752:

Hi T. I wanted to let you know that the person who posted this is now

552: 2937:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Vicky85144

2860: 650: 1759:

Would that be sufficient for an overturn of your former decision?

1351:

Hello, ReaderofthePack. Please check your email; you've got mail!

150:

Knowledge (XXG) tends to be overly cautious with stuff like that.

1727:

Hi Tokyogirl79, thanks for taking the time to review my article.

2939:

and the IP sock puppets. During the previous report, I blanked

2828:. Is this how bad Knowledge (XXG) has gotten? Also, are you an 1733:

I did provide a link to the Museum of London's Show Space page

1521:

Thank you for all the hard work you put into Knowledge (XXG)!

672:

I'll reply your talk page so this is located all in one place.

470:. There was also some confirmed sockpuppetry during this time. 270:

LOL. No harm, no foul. I understand where you're coming from.

25: 2107:, if that helps contextualize why this one is so infatuated. 1664:

13:15:12, 9 February 2016 review of submission by Amanda Paul

2390:

Thanks. Just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed something.

2160:? These are the correctly capitalisation and I wish to move 2001:

Dear Tokyogirl79. Thanks for your comments about my article

1840:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Books/Archive 18#Red Gambit

1581:

Sure, I can give it a whirl - what would you like me to do?

1344: 1182:

Just wanted to say thanks for the work you did looking into

1108: 806: 1979:

Shoot - I should've done that. Thanks for letting me know!

1842:. So, I am wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at 1432:

It is the same with dissemblers such as our mutual friend.

492:. Considering the article's history it's unlikely that you 2871:

attack. I know that you're frustrated, but it's better to

1745:

Secondly I have also now added a link to a news interview

1203: 823:

Please see the event and add your name as a participant:

1313:

There has already been more than enough said to explain

3182:

Home media section needs to be expanded in more detail.

1961: 1755:

http://www.londonlive.co.uk/news/2016-02-08/london-life

1713: 1709: 1701: 1693: 1356: 1046: 517: 3177:

Sources need to be added to the unreferenced material.

1140:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

2758:

Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Youtube0117

2674:

An attack page, huh? ;-) Thanks for actioning that!

2612:

Hi. I replied to your comments directly on the page

2520:

Responding to Concerns on the Washington Papers page

2428:

Responding to Concerns on the Washington Papers page

2148:

Please delete these two pages to make way for a move

1204:

Comisar's acting claims ARE mentioned in GQ article!

252:

nice, has similar interest, might be worth a shot"--

2068:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) sockpuppets of Bonadeaeaea

1960:Could you please restore the last userpage version 1772:but no longer have any direct connection with him. 1122:

File:Strange Fruit Lillian Smith 1944 Paperback.jpg

193:Is this how we start the New Year? FWIW, I believe 2072:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Sonicwave32 2060:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Bonadeaeaea 743:this edit as well. If anyone agrees, please edit. 382:Looks good - I'll unprotect and move the article. 2981: 2549:I suggest this be continued where it started, at 1435:I would be in two minds over his request myself. 133:LOL, it's not. You're fairly direct, aren't you? 2618:User_talk:SwisterTwister#Draft:Men_On_The_Border 1425:Like those who comb their hair over a bald patch 1846:. I have a feeling that she probably satisfies 1762:I'm going to continue tidying up my citations. 821:We welcome all of you to join this edit-a-thon. 355:Hi, Tokyogirl, would you consider unprotecting 166:If you want a good laugh, you need to download 2589:Thank you very much for your contributions to 2064:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Bonadea 1136:Note that any non-free images not used in any 799:Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon 8: 520:tried to back up the acting claims by using 1564:https://en.wikipedia.org/I_Drink_Your_Blood 3006: 1964:if you think that they were not a sock. -- 1404: 1256: 1210: 2982:Hizon's Catering page Recommended for AfD 831:Feel free to ask if you have question(s). 516:The article version you are referring to 496:have a conflict of interest of some type. 2240:And what rationale would something like 862:For dealing with the Comisar situation. 2242:1979 AMA National Speedway Championship 1411:2606:A000:F283:3D00:1DD9:7738:40F4:E5E9 359:? The article was created yet again at 1628:wikiedu.org class, Women in Warfare. 1562:the link to it if you are interested: 186: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1217:2606:A000:F283:3D00:28C9:39:29DB:2536 198: 7: 3013:2602:304:CE4E:3B20:8E5:4AF8:44C1:566 1355: 987:) 13:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Susan 2901:so the draft can be moved there?-- 2670:Deleting "Excellent academic help" 1689:Draft:Our London Lives (2016 film) 24: 2030:User:Narine-GH/Origins: Discovery 816:Geographical Indications in India 2899:Thank You (Meghan Trainor album) 2636:) 19:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC) 2628:) 20:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 2488: 1859:, so it was on my watchlist. -- 1514: 1166: 1009: 855: 728:GQ article is a reliable source. 589: 316: 199: 187: 29: 2103:These were all confirmed to be 848:A bowl of strawberries for you! 205:Hmm, maybe you two can share a 2865:Apply directly to the forehead 542:Thanks for your Reply on Steve 1: 3158:17:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 2665:01:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 2646:21:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC) 2603:14:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC) 2579:03:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 2563:19:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2551:User talk:Papersofgwashington 2512:21:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC) 2474:19:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2422:05:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2402:04:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2382:04:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2361:15:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 2336:02:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 2320:02:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 2300:02:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 2272:12:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC) 2225:06:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC) 2196:06:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC) 2142:02:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 2118:17:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC) 2089:11:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC) 2048:02:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 2015:09:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC) 1991:11:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC) 1974:14:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC) 1944:00:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC) 1816:06:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC) 1539:Thanks! Omnomnom brownies... 1131:our policy for non-free media 1023:Thank you for your guidance. 955:08:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC) 419: 1926:23:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 1907:19:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 1887:19:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 1869:14:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 1788:13:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC) 1659:18:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC) 1640:16:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC) 1617:01:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC) 1593:05:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 1576:19:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC) 1551:04:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 1531:00:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 1502:08:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 1481:05:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 1459:12:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC) 1419:22:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 1393:11:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 1360:at any time by removing the 1334:04:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 1290:13:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 1271:00:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC) 1244:08:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC) 1225:22:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 1196:06:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC) 1154:03:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC) 1142:criteria for speedy deletion 1097:06:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 1077:06:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 1059:00:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 1033:14:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 997:13:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 921:05:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 904:05:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 867:03:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC) 843:17:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC) 793:22:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 766:20:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 722:11:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 704:11:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 684:08:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 667:07:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 635:17:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 614:17:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 575:08:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 536:05:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC) 446:11:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 412:14:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 394:13:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 377:13:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 340:02:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 301:18:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC) 2794:your personal information. 2166:Fueled by Ramen discography 2158:Fueled By Ramen discography 1398:Clarification of disclaimer 974:10:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 282:06:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC) 262:05:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 241:14:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 221:05:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC) 182:18:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC) 162:18:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC) 145:18:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC) 128:18:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC) 3219: 2343:Draft:William Pittman Lett 1852:has not been received well 1339: 3204:18:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 3129:18:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 3099:12:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 3083:10:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 3065:14:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 3039:10:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 3021:20:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 2996:02:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 2976:09:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 2959:12:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 2925:11:39, 4 March 2016 (UTC) 2887:05:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC) 2842:23:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 2806:05:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC) 2769:20:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC) 2737:09:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 2719:08:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 2703:08:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 2686:08:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 2487: 1932:WP:BLP/N#Rita Pam Tarachi 1176:The Barnstar of Diligence 1172: 1165: 1109: 1008: 588: 499:What is your relation to 315: 18:User talk:ReaderofthePack 1751:London Live (TV channel) 1487:Necronomicon Providences 962:I never received any... 776:with Comisar shows that 756:Keep up the good work. 2941:User talk:103.41.99.126 2614:Draft:Men_On_The_Border 2608:Draft:Men On The Border 2054:Curiouser and curiouser 1753:News yesterday morning 875:GQ does mention acting! 2854:That's not really how 2748:user was Youtube0117. 1349: 1114: 811: 749:The New York Observer 2496:The Original Barnstar 1348: 1119:Thanks for uploading 1112: 1081:I've sent it back to 933:User:Michaelmcgrinder 810: 690:Oh, forgot to mention 420:Steve's acting career 324:The Original Barnstar 42:of past discussions. 1770:The Ballet of Change 1017:The Admin's Barnstar 597:The Special Barnstar 197:is applicable here. 168:Dark Dungeons (film) 2935:Just a followup on 2931:Re: User:Vicky85144 2820:Why did you delete 2545:interest concerns. 2481:A barnstar for you! 2462:Papersofgwashington 1002:A barnstar for you! 582:A barnstar for you! 361:Futuristic (Rapper) 357:Futuristic (rapper) 350:Futuristic (rapper) 309:A barnstar for you! 195:WP:NOTDATINGSERVICE 2003:Origins: Discovery 1997:Origins: Discovery 1507:A brownie for you! 1357:remove this notice 1350: 1115: 818:related articles. 812: 3023: 3011:comment added by 2873:assume good faith 2717: 2684: 2517: 2516: 2477: 2460:comment added by 2267: 2191: 2168:to those titles. 2099:talk page stalker 2087: 1875:Knowledge (XXG). 1536: 1535: 1421: 1409:comment added by 1296:My final posting. 1273: 1261:comment added by 1227: 1215:comment added by 1201: 1200: 1127:claim of fair use 1038: 1037: 958: 941:comment added by 872: 871: 739:GQ article link. 620: 619: 578: 561:comment added by 449: 432:comment added by 345: 344: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3210: 3125: 3079: 3049:Hi Toykogirl79! 3035: 2972: 2921: 2883: 2853: 2826:bite the newbies 2802: 2733: 2711: 2699: 2678: 2575: 2492: 2485: 2484: 2476: 2454: 2418: 2398: 2395: 2378: 2357: 2354: 2332: 2316: 2296: 2286: 2269: 2268: 2264: 2258: 2253: 2250: 2239: 2221: 2207: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2182: 2177: 2174: 2138: 2113: 2102: 2080: 2044: 2026: 1987: 1903: 1883: 1844:Rita Pam Tarachi 1822:Rita Pam Tarachi 1812: 1718: 1717: 1589: 1547: 1518: 1511: 1510: 1477: 1456: 1451: 1381: 1379: 1373: 1369: 1363: 1359: 1347: 1340:You've got mail! 1330: 1286: 1240: 1170: 1163: 1162: 1117: 1111: 1093: 1073: 1013: 1006: 1005: 970: 957: 943:Michaelmcgrinder 935: 917: 900: 859: 852: 851: 789: 718: 680: 631: 593: 586: 585: 577: 555: 532: 501:Jim bexley speed 459: 448: 426: 390: 320: 313: 312: 278: 237: 218: 213: 204: 203: 202: 192: 191: 190: 178: 158: 141: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3218: 3217: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3137: 3123: 3077: 3047: 3033: 3003: 2984: 2970: 2933: 2919: 2897:Can you delete 2895: 2881: 2847: 2824:? Please don't 2818: 2800: 2745: 2731: 2697: 2672: 2653: 2610: 2587: 2573: 2522: 2483: 2455: 2430: 2416: 2396: 2393: 2376: 2355: 2352: 2346: 2330: 2314: 2294: 2280: 2262: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2246: 2233: 2219: 2201: 2186: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2170: 2162:Fueled by Ramen 2154:Fueled By Ramen 2150: 2136: 2109: 2096: 2056: 2042: 2020: 1999: 1985: 1958: 1901: 1881: 1824: 1810: 1749:undertook with 1691: 1687: 1666: 1647: 1624: 1587: 1559: 1545: 1509: 1489: 1475: 1454: 1449: 1427: 1400: 1382: 1377: 1371: 1367: 1365:You've got mail 1361: 1353: 1345: 1342: 1328: 1298: 1284: 1252: 1238: 1206: 1161: 1144:. Thank you. -- 1106: 1105: 1091: 1071: 1043: 1004: 968: 936: 929: 915: 898: 877: 850: 801: 787: 758:205.115.188.114 730: 716: 692: 678: 643: 629: 616: 584: 556: 544: 530: 522:this GQ article 453: 427: 422: 388: 353: 311: 293:Bellerophon5685 276: 254:Bellerophon5685 235: 216: 211: 200: 188: 176: 156: 139: 120:Bellerophon5685 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3216: 3214: 3193: 3191: 3190: 3188: 3185: 3183: 3180: 3178: 3175: 3173: 3170: 3168: 3136: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3086: 3085: 3046: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3002: 3001:Timothy Parker 2999: 2983: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2932: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2894: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2771: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2671: 2668: 2652: 2649: 2609: 2606: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2565: 2521: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2499: 2498: 2493: 2482: 2479: 2429: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2385: 2384: 2345: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2322: 2302: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2228: 2227: 2149: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2032:or ideally at 1998: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1957: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1910: 1909: 1890: 1889: 1823: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1724: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1685: 1665: 1662: 1646: 1643: 1623: 1620: 1596: 1595: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1534: 1533: 1519: 1508: 1505: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1426: 1423: 1399: 1396: 1352: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1297: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1198: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1171: 1160: 1157: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1079: 1042: 1041:Puzzling close 1039: 1036: 1035: 1020: 1019: 1014: 1003: 1000: 977: 976: 928: 925: 924: 923: 906: 876: 873: 870: 869: 860: 849: 846: 832: 822: 804: 800: 797: 796: 795: 774:this interview 729: 726: 725: 724: 691: 688: 687: 686: 642: 639: 638: 637: 618: 617: 604: 600: 599: 594: 583: 580: 543: 540: 539: 538: 514: 510: 506: 505: 504: 497: 486: 479: 471: 462: 461: 421: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 397: 396: 352: 346: 343: 342: 332:Duruflerequiem 327: 326: 321: 310: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 285: 284: 267: 266: 265: 264: 246: 245: 244: 243: 224: 223: 212:SwisterTwister 184: 164: 147: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3215: 3206: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3196:Paleface Jack 3189: 3186: 3184: 3181: 3179: 3176: 3174: 3171: 3169: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3160: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150:Paleface Jack 3147: 3143: 3142:Paleface Jack 3135:Collaboration 3134: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3084: 3081: 3080: 3074: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3044: 3040: 3037: 3036: 3030: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3000: 2998: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2977: 2974: 2973: 2967: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2947: 2942: 2938: 2930: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2916: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2892: 2888: 2885: 2884: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2857: 2851: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2815: 2807: 2804: 2803: 2797: 2792: 2788: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2774: 2773: 2770: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2742: 2738: 2735: 2734: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2715: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2701: 2700: 2694: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2682: 2677: 2669: 2667: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2657:Paleface Jack 2650: 2648: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2607: 2605: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2591:Mental Models 2584: 2580: 2577: 2576: 2570: 2566: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2519: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2491: 2486: 2480: 2478: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2427: 2423: 2420: 2419: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2383: 2380: 2379: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2358: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2327: 2323: 2321: 2318: 2317: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2301: 2298: 2297: 2291: 2284: 2279: 2278: 2273: 2270: 2265: 2259: 2251: 2243: 2237: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2216: 2212: 2205: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2189: 2183: 2175: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2147: 2143: 2140: 2139: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2112: 2106: 2100: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2083: 2082:contributions 2079: 2078: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2053: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2024: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1996: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1955: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1908: 1905: 1904: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1878: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1766: 1763: 1760: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1747:Paul Atherton 1743: 1740: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1728: 1725: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1690: 1686: 1684: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1644: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1621: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609:Paleface Jack 1606: 1602: 1601:Paleface Jack 1594: 1591: 1590: 1584: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1568:Paleface Jack 1565: 1557:Collaboration 1556: 1552: 1549: 1548: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1513: 1512: 1506: 1504: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494:LadyLovecraft 1486: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1472: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1452: 1444: 1440: 1438: 1433: 1430: 1424: 1422: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1397: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1376: 1366: 1358: 1335: 1332: 1331: 1325: 1321: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301:man? Really? 1295: 1291: 1288: 1287: 1281: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1249: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1169: 1164: 1158: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1116: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1068: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1047: 1040: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1007: 1001: 999: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 975: 972: 971: 965: 961: 960: 959: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 934: 926: 922: 919: 918: 912: 907: 905: 902: 901: 895: 890: 889: 888: 884: 881: 874: 868: 865: 861: 858: 854: 853: 847: 845: 844: 840: 836: 829: 828: 827: 819: 817: 809: 805: 798: 794: 791: 790: 784: 779: 775: 770: 769: 768: 767: 763: 759: 753: 752: 747: 744: 740: 737: 734: 727: 723: 720: 719: 713: 710:fairly well. 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 689: 685: 682: 681: 675: 671: 670: 669: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 640: 636: 633: 632: 626: 622: 621: 615: 611: 607: 602: 601: 598: 595: 592: 587: 581: 579: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 554: 549: 541: 537: 534: 533: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 502: 498: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 480: 477: 472: 469: 464: 463: 457: 452: 451: 450: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 395: 392: 391: 385: 381: 380: 379: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 351: 348:Unprotecting 347: 341: 337: 333: 329: 328: 325: 322: 319: 314: 308: 302: 298: 294: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 280: 279: 273: 269: 268: 263: 259: 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 242: 239: 238: 232: 228: 227: 226: 225: 222: 219: 214: 208: 207:Crystal Pepsi 196: 185: 183: 180: 179: 173: 169: 165: 163: 160: 159: 153: 148: 146: 143: 142: 136: 132: 131: 130: 129: 125: 121: 117: 112: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3192: 3161: 3138: 3122: 3115:This website 3087: 3076: 3055: 3051: 3048: 3032: 3007:— Preceding 3004: 2985: 2969: 2944: 2934: 2918: 2896: 2880: 2869:WP:ADHOMINEM 2819: 2799: 2790: 2746: 2730: 2696: 2673: 2654: 2611: 2588: 2572: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2495: 2456:— Preceding 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2415: 2392: 2375: 2351: 2347: 2329: 2313: 2293: 2245: 2244:fall under? 2218: 2169: 2151: 2135: 2110: 2075: 2057: 2041: 2000: 1984: 1959: 1900: 1880: 1834:and also at 1825: 1809: 1800: 1795: 1777: 1775:Many Thanks 1774: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1732: 1729: 1726: 1723: 1676: 1648: 1625: 1597: 1586: 1560: 1544: 1490: 1474: 1465: 1445: 1441: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1405:— Preceding 1401: 1383: 1327: 1322:include it. 1319: 1314: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1283: 1257:— Preceding 1253: 1237: 1211:— Preceding 1207: 1175: 1137: 1135: 1120: 1118: 1107: 1090: 1070: 1044: 1016: 978: 967: 937:— Preceding 932: 930: 914: 897: 885: 882: 878: 830: 824: 820: 813: 802: 786: 777: 754: 748: 745: 741: 738: 735: 731: 715: 693: 677: 659:Michieldewit 644: 628: 596: 557:— Preceding 545: 529: 493: 428:— Preceding 423: 404:—Largo Plazo 387: 369:—Largo Plazo 354: 323: 275: 234: 175: 155: 138: 113: 109: 106:Derek Savage 78: 43: 37: 3119:Tokyogirl79 3091:Xmaster8621 3073:Tokyogirl79 3057:Xmaster8621 3029:Tokyogirl79 2966:Tokyogirl79 2915:Tokyogirl79 2877:Tokyogirl79 2796:Tokyogirl79 2727:Tokyogirl79 2693:Tokyogirl79 2569:Tokyogirl79 2412:Tokyogirl79 2372:Tokyogirl79 2326:Tokyogirl79 2310:Tokyogirl79 2290:Tokyogirl79 2236:Tokyogirl79 2215:Tokyogirl79 2132:Tokyogirl79 2038:Tokyogirl79 1981:Tokyogirl79 1897:Tokyogirl79 1877:Tokyogirl79 1806:Tokyogirl79 1780:Amanda Paul 1670:Amanda Paul 1651:Wolfgaenger 1583:Tokyogirl79 1541:Tokyogirl79 1471:Tokyogirl79 1324:Tokyogirl79 1280:Tokyogirl79 1263:65.184.35.7 1234:Tokyogirl79 1087:Tokyogirl79 1067:Tokyogirl79 964:Tokyogirl79 911:Tokyogirl79 894:Tokyogirl79 833:Regards. -- 783:Tokyogirl79 712:Tokyogirl79 674:Tokyogirl79 647:Tokyogirl79 625:Tokyogirl79 548:Tokyogirl79 526:Tokyogirl79 384:Tokyogirl79 272:Tokyogirl79 231:Tokyogirl79 172:Tokyogirl79 152:Tokyogirl79 135:Tokyogirl79 36:This is an 2988:Jenv Corre 2822:my article 2638:PCMorphy72 2630:PCMorphy72 2622:PCMorphy72 2308:was done. 2213:deletion. 1966:Tito Dutta 1838:regarding 1622:Thank you. 1385:Tito Dutta 1025:Jdellapina 989:Susanmac50 981:Susanmac50 835:Tito Dutta 696:Tito Dutta 476:WP:PRIMARY 98:Archive 30 90:Archive 27 85:Archive 26 79:Archive 25 73:Archive 24 68:Archive 23 60:Archive 20 3140:Horror.-- 2903:MaranoFan 2850:MML Ruler 2834:MML Ruler 2816:Seriously 2762:MarnetteD 2756:and this 2709:Ajraddatz 2676:Ajraddatz 2306:WP:BEFORE 2283:Anarchyte 2249:Anarchyte 2204:Anarchyte 2173:Anarchyte 2023:Narine-GH 2007:Narine-GH 1936:Marchjuly 1918:Marchjuly 1861:Marchjuly 1796:permanent 1778:Amanda ( 1645:Thank You 1632:Bellicist 1380:template. 1159:Thank you 365:WP:NMUSIC 116:available 3009:unsigned 2787:WP:NBOOK 2595:Spalding 2470:contribs 2458:unsigned 1956:Revision 1836:WT:BOOKS 1680:contribs 1407:unsigned 1259:unsigned 1250:You win! 1213:unsigned 1138:articles 951:contribs 939:unsigned 655:Symbaloo 641:start.me 606:Sage1200 571:contribs 563:Maniamit 559:unsigned 456:Maniamit 442:contribs 434:Maniamit 430:unsigned 402:Thanks! 3124:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3078:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3034:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2971:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2920:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2893:Request 2882:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2856:WP:BITE 2801:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2754:blocked 2743:Apology 2732:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2698:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2585:Thanks! 2574:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2504:Juamari 2417:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2377:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2331:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2315:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2295:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2220:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2137:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2128:bonadea 2105:Nsmutte 2077:bonadea 2043:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1986:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1902:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1882:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1828:WP:BLPN 1811:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1801:against 1702:history 1599:know.-- 1588:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1546:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1476:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1437:WP:ROPE 1329:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1285:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1239:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1188:Melcous 1092:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1072:(｡◕‿◕｡) 969:(｡◕‿◕｡) 916:(｡◕‿◕｡) 899:(｡◕‿◕｡) 788:(｡◕‿◕｡) 717:(｡◕‿◕｡) 679:(｡◕‿◕｡) 630:(｡◕‿◕｡) 531:(｡◕‿◕｡) 389:(｡◕‿◕｡) 277:(｡◕‿◕｡) 236:(｡◕‿◕｡) 177:(｡◕‿◕｡) 157:(｡◕‿◕｡) 140:(｡◕‿◕｡) 39:archive 2913:Done! 2861:HeadOn 2651:Update 2555:Drmies 2368:REFUND 2034:WP:AfC 1848:WP:GNG 1830:about 1523:Jbegle 1455:Faddle 1450:Fiddle 1184:CNNYAW 803:Hello, 651:IgHome 546:Hello 490:WP:COI 468:Cullen 291:out.-- 2946:Farix 2830:admin 1710:watch 1706:links 1146:B-bot 1051:Alsee 927:email 494:don't 485:this. 16:< 3200:talk 3154:talk 3146:talk 3111:here 3109:and 3107:here 3095:talk 3061:talk 3017:talk 2992:talk 2907:talk 2838:talk 2791:very 2766:Talk 2714:Talk 2681:Talk 2661:talk 2642:talk 2634:talk 2626:talk 2599:talk 2559:talk 2508:talk 2466:talk 2397:5969 2394:Onel 2356:5969 2353:Onel 2263:talk 2257:work 2187:talk 2181:work 2164:and 2156:and 2111:Crow 2085:talk 2070:and 2011:talk 1970:talk 1962:here 1940:talk 1922:talk 1865:talk 1784:talk 1714:logs 1698:talk 1694:edit 1674:talk 1655:talk 1636:talk 1613:talk 1605:talk 1572:talk 1527:talk 1498:talk 1466:knew 1415:talk 1389:talk 1267:talk 1221:talk 1192:talk 1150:talk 1055:talk 1029:talk 993:talk 985:talk 947:talk 839:talk 762:talk 700:talk 663:talk 653:and 610:talk 567:talk 518:here 438:talk 408:talk 373:talk 336:talk 297:talk 258:talk 217:talk 124:talk 2909:) 2832:?-- 1375:ygm 1370:or 1320:not 1315:why 1133:). 1083:AfD 864:GAB 645:Hi 3202:) 3194:-- 3156:) 3113:. 3097:) 3063:) 3045:Hi 3019:) 2994:) 2957:) 2953:| 2840:) 2663:) 2644:) 2601:) 2561:) 2553:. 2510:) 2472:) 2468:• 2260:| 2211:G6 2184:| 2066:, 2062:, 2013:) 1972:) 1942:) 1924:) 1867:) 1790:) 1786:) 1712:| 1708:| 1704:| 1700:| 1696:| 1682:) 1657:) 1638:) 1615:) 1574:) 1529:) 1500:) 1417:) 1391:) 1378:}} 1372:{{ 1368:}} 1362:{{ 1269:) 1223:) 1194:) 1152:) 1057:) 1031:) 995:) 953:) 949:• 841:) 778:he 764:) 702:) 665:) 612:) 573:) 569:• 444:) 440:• 410:) 375:) 338:) 299:) 260:) 126:) 94:→ 64:← 3198:( 3152:( 3144:( 3093:( 3059:( 3015:( 2990:( 2955:c 2951:t 2949:( 2905:( 2852:: 2848:@ 2836:( 2764:| 2716:) 2712:( 2683:) 2679:( 2659:( 2640:( 2632:( 2624:( 2597:( 2557:( 2506:( 2464:( 2285:: 2281:@ 2266:) 2254:( 2238:: 2234:@ 2206:: 2202:@ 2190:) 2178:( 2101:) 2097:( 2025:: 2021:@ 2009:( 1968:( 1938:( 1920:( 1863:( 1782:( 1716:) 1692:( 1677:· 1672:( 1653:( 1634:( 1611:( 1603:( 1570:( 1525:( 1496:( 1413:( 1387:( 1265:( 1219:( 1190:( 1148:( 1113:⚠ 1053:( 1027:( 991:( 983:( 945:( 837:( 760:( 698:( 661:( 608:( 565:( 458:: 454:@ 436:( 406:( 371:( 334:( 295:( 256:( 122:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index