31:
368:
send someone to the appropriate page, even if they type all lowercase, and even if the redirect pages are deleted. It's just like a redirect, but without the redirect page. Deleting them will remove needless clutter in mainspace searches. With this knowledge, I wonder if you might consider changing your vote to
367:
page. I also voted to keep these redirect pages. I thought that if they were removed, then I would not automatically get to the pages I was looking for if I happened to type all lowercase letters, which would be pretty inconvenient. However, it turns out I was wrong. The software will automatically
127:
Why was the material I posted a copyright problem? The text was sourced by something like 7 well known newspaper and broadcast organisations in
Australia. I don't see how the image violates copyright. Yes it is copyright, but Knowledge (XXG) has guidelines on that. I understood the image was within
436:
As you saw on the
Discussion page, even quotes get deleted, such as the famous "We will decide" slogan. There were edit wars with people who thought it should not be there. Then it got deleted because someone didn't like the word "slogan". Only when you stepped in did the "deleters" step back.
178:
1. I'd taken most of the adjectives from the newspaper articles. If I use my own adjectives, I worried that other editors might say it's my POV. I thought that taking the same adjectives as the newspapers used would avoid that. eg, words like "lunged at" and "drunken rage" were taken from the
92:. Based on this I think it is proper time to push for Featured Portal status for Bangladesh Portal, which will be an important milestone for WikiProject Bangladesh. But to achieve this I need help from you. Please participate in the on-going discussion on the
192:? Nobody has bothered to write much about Glenn Milne's glory and achievements. Only 2 small paragraphs. I wish there was more content in there. Would more glory in the article have allowed the full-length description of the fight incident to stay, as far as
322:
Hi, can't we say that there is some controversy over gitmo. Obviously Hicks was probably tortured or otherwise interrogated - rightly or wrongly - but we must let people draw their own conclusions about the "confession". What do you think?
70:. Your reversions appear to be the work of a c*ckjock and have been undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Someone who thinks you're a humorless c*nt 23:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
440:
It seems like a lost cause trying to add info to this article. What do you think? Am I wrong? Are the people who hit the delete button without prior discussion right? Thanks for considering this article. Cheers,
425:
Hi
Recurring Dreams. I come for advice, as I'm relatively new to Knowledge (XXG). The Request For Comment has resulted in a comment. That lots of FACT tags are deplorable. I won't use them again on that article!
306:
Having been here less than a day, I can already tell you without a doubt that it is his/her business. This is the encyclopedia that "anyone can edit" that makes whatever you're talking about anyone's business :)
433:
that one editor continually deletes, even though numerous other editors found it useful and notable. What should I do about that? How do I get someone to arbitrate on it? Are the options exhausted?
346:, there's a guy adding anti-abortionist poetry and then labelling the article for speedy deletion. So abortion might not be pleasant but please, this is meant to be an encyclopedia. --
85:
473:
and was wondering if you were still interested in either an admin coach or running at WP:RFA. I'd coach/nom you if you were still interested, just let me know which one.
429:
The other issue, about quick deletion of new content received no response. Is that beyond the scope of RfC? One example I really hoped would get resolved was the
179:
newspaper stories of the event. That's why I carefully added a citation for just about every sentence, so people could see where each adjective came from.
231:
89:
470:
297:
238:
533:
511:
410:
Ha! I hope that's all she gets out of the election this year, and not another few hundred thousand tax-payer dollars.
333:
OK, mind if you add it? Only because it seems to be a hotly disputed subject and you seem to know what's acceptable --
364:
47:
38:
17:
535:
513:
483:
459:
445:
404:
386:
376:
350:
337:
327:
311:
271:
257:
225:
207:
141:
100:
285:
242:
456:
401:
383:
255:
93:
411:
493:
I don't think it's a great idea to label journalists other than the extremists, but just for your info
494:
293:
289:
250:
168:
guidelines you directed me to seem to indicate it's better to cite the quote in the article text).
160:, plus the quotation. Maybe, for the quote, I should have said something like "Stephen Mayne told
523:
501:
246:
193:
189:
185:
81:
74:
430:
373:
249:. Please feel free to contribute to this discussion in any way you see as being positive. --
204:
151:
article. I found out the image was not a problem regarding copyright, so I added it back in.
138:
173:
Writing such an article, there are 2 difficult issues, I find are like walking a tightrope:
165:
347:
334:
324:
308:
222:
66:
Please refrain from making anally retentive reversions to
Knowledge (XXG), as you did to
474:
121:
97:
520:
498:
67:
60:
442:
343:
455:
The authenticity appears to be verified by clicking WHOIS on the contribs page.
419:
268:
148:
117:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
158:("Mayne jumped off stage as Milne, slurring his words, continued to abuse him")
363:
I noticed that you voted to keep the Wp:an/i and Wp:afd redirects at the
188:. If the Milne article was a hugely long article, would it then not be
382:
Ironically... works because of the redirect, not in spite of it.
25:
281:
Recurring Dreams, I think you should mind your own business.
398:
218:
84:. I have tried to address the concerns in earlier
156:The text... there was only one sentence verbatim
131:The version you reverted to has only 1 citation.
147:Thanks, Recurring dreams, for your advice re
8:
267:How do you get photos into the articles? --
134:Can I request your comment and guidance?
471:Knowledge (XXG):Admin_coaching/Requests
80:Hi, I'd like to draw your attention to
245:regarding the future and goals of the
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
243:WikiProject Crowded House's talk page
7:
96:and give me your valuable inputs.-
24:
469:Hey. I saw your request over at
29:
372:. Thanks, and have a good day.
88:and checked the portal against
116:Where did I go wrong with the
1:
536:12:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
514:12:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
484:05:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
460:08:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
446:10:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
405:07:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
387:07:57, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
552:
377:18:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
351:14:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
338:12:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
328:11:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
312:11:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
272:06:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
258:10:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
226:11:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
208:08:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
142:01:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
101:03:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
18:User talk:Recurring dreams
300:) on 18:45, 7 August 2007
232:WikiProject Crowded House
277:Re:Caringbah High School
90:Featured portal criteria
365:Redirects for deletion
110:Hi Recurring Dreams,
42:of past discussions.
113:I seek your advice.
128:Wiki's guidelines.
397:McDonalds, maybe?
302:
288:comment added by
184:2. You mentioned
82:Bangladesh portal
75:Bangladesh portal
54:
53:
48:current talk page
543:
481:
431:Bob Hawke motion
412:Recurring dreams
301:
282:
253:
33:
32:
26:
551:
550:
546:
545:
544:
542:
541:
540:
532:
528:
527:
519:Progressive ;)
510:
506:
505:
491:
475:
467:
453:
423:
395:
361:
342:Take a look at
320:
283:
279:
265:
251:
235:
216:
108:
78:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
549:
547:
539:
538:
530:
525:
524:
508:
503:
502:
490:
487:
466:
463:
452:
451:Interesting...
449:
422:
416:
415:
414:
394:
391:
390:
389:
360:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
319:
316:
315:
314:
278:
275:
264:
261:
234:
229:
215:
212:
211:
210:
202:
198:
197:
181:
180:
175:
174:
170:
169:
153:
152:
122:Walkley Awards
107:
106:Walkley Awards
104:
77:
72:
63:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
548:
537:
534:
529:
522:
518:
517:
516:
515:
512:
507:
500:
496:
488:
486:
485:
482:
480:
479:
472:
464:
462:
461:
458:
450:
448:
447:
444:
438:
434:
432:
427:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
407:
406:
403:
399:
392:
388:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
375:
371:
366:
358:
352:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
331:
330:
329:
326:
317:
313:
310:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
276:
274:
273:
270:
262:
260:
259:
256:
254:
248:
244:
241:has begun at
240:
233:
230:
228:
227:
224:
220:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:
177:
176:
172:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
154:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
135:
132:
129:
125:
123:
119:
114:
111:
105:
103:
102:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
76:
73:
71:
69:
68:Andrew Hansen
62:
61:Andrew Hansen
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
497:might help.
492:
477:
476:
468:
457:Orderinchaos
454:
439:
435:
428:
424:
402:Orderinchaos
396:
384:Orderinchaos
369:
362:
344:Donald Spitz
321:
280:
266:
236:
217:
201:thanks, R.C.
161:
157:
136:
133:
130:
126:
115:
112:
109:
79:
65:
55:
43:
37:
420:John Howard
374:Nick Graves
284:—Preceding
247:WikiProject
205:Pigmypossum
149:Glenn Milne
139:Pigmypossum
118:Glenn Milne
86:peer review
36:This is an
489:David Marr
418:Advice on
348:Lancastria
335:Lancastria
325:Lancastria
309:Lancastria
290:Gabbymc333
239:discussion
164:..." (the
124:material?
98:Arman Aziz
478:Wizardman
393:10% Steak
223:Timeshift
162:ABC Radio
94:talk page
298:contribs
286:unsigned
219:thankyou
194:WP:UNDUE
190:WP:UNDUE
186:WP:UNDUE
137:thanks,
443:Lester2
39:archive
531:﹌ 0000
509:﹌ 0000
370:delete
269:Pezzar
263:Photos
237:Hi! A
166:WP:MOS
465:Admin
318:Hicks
252:linca
196:goes?
16:<
521:Alec
499:Alec
495:this
400:LOL
294:talk
359:RfD
323:--
307:--
296:•
221:.
214:JH
120:/
526:✉
504:✉
292:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.