31:
671:
624:- I didn't know how to do this. And thanks for your previous reverts of vandalism to this page; I've also added it to my watchlist, as vandalism is an ongoing problem with articles about schools. This page surely was a mess, but I hope it can escape deletion. The question of notability has arisen with many schools articles.
641:
starting on the closest one to me I have been discussing content with another user and therefore have not moved on yet. I am happy to correct my oversight by providing source information for these items, however, I believe it is not ethical for me to simply undo your changes without raising this with you first.
715:
Being new here I am seeking your advice on this:- As you know I raised the issue of
Committees and Patron Associations for parliamentarian's pages on the Australian Politics Discussion page. While there has been a comment on the Patron and I now agree there has been no comment on the committees yet.
340:
Hi, I just started on wikipedia a few hours ago because I have a geeky love of editing things and thought I'd help "wikify" a few articles. I was just wondering whether you had much experience doing this and whether you had any comments / thoughts / tips. How do you remove an article from the list of
146:
the
Hamersley article I encountered before editing was very excessive in detail containing verbose language, and kind of detail like listing the scientific name of every single bottlebrush found on a plain (I've never ever seen that in a locality article). to be absolutely honest, and I patrol around
90:
Actually an answer would be appreciated, all editors are expected to act in good faith, and failing to consider the material in a debate and instead calling for its close based on facts irrelevant to the debate is an issue that can be raised not only on the debate page but also a user talk page (as
351:
Hi! First of all, "wikifying" a page means adding internal links to a page, meaning linking words to other wikipedia pages. Pages needing to be wikified often have a box at the top saying they need to be wikified. Once you believe you've wikified the article, you can remove the {wikify} tag at the
640:
I have noticed that you have deleted a section of the Ken
Ticehurst page that I edited recently. While I respect that you have been here a while, I would have appreciated you pointing the error out to me before simply deleting it. I am intending to work on NSW central Coast MPs, however since
417:
Given the context of a list of
Australian news and current affairs programs, "ttn" fits in perfectly. It's main difference from the others listed is that it is pitched at a much younger audience. The ABC's similar "Behind the News" was once also listed, but as with most of the ABC-TV's news and
147:
a lot of locality articles, it should not be a featured article nor good article, because it is not encyclopaedic and written verbosely in parts instead of being concise and to the point and it mixes a lot of very localised non notable information amongst the main text.
716:
How long should I leave it:- I have been holding off any other work till I sort out where I have been going wrong, don't want to start creating other MPs if the content is not going to make the grade. For a concensus I have sent this to three people
64:
I suspect you did not consider why the article was nominated, or went to it to see the NPOV issues it contains. Please do so, and consider changing your comments, and if you have a legitimate problem with my nominations please raise it on my talk page
390:
I also thank you for the welcoming. But, in the Super Smash Bros. Brawl section, someone is deleting my talks and I recently edited part of the article, but some one is deleting that, too! Do you know why? If it is a user, could you please find them?
695:, and for the helpful tips given to Hammer for his and his otters' next run at gaining the key. Also, Hammer has talked to the otters, and from now on they promise not to leave fish guts and clamshells on the Articles for Deletion pages anymore.
193:
A general comment on how an external factor is influencing a local industry is fine. but back to my original point. if someone wanted to know more about the voting system at state level in
Hamersley all they needed to do was click on
157:
as with most things, if you search long enough you can dig up more information till the cows come home. notability and relevance are primary reasons for including more content. examples like this show unencyclopaedic writing
401:
You can look through the histories of the pages and compare the changes. If someone is deleting your additions, try to discuss the changes on the article's talk page, or on the user's talk page. Happy editing!
91:
the comments made can be considered against a particular user rather than for/against an article). I would appreciate it if DGG did not make up policy and leave matters between two users to those two users
591:
Thanks so much for your comments and advice here! If you're still interested, I've tried to address the concerns raised, so if you'd like to have a look some time it would be appreciated. Happy editing!
341:
articles that need to be wikified once you think you've fixed it? As I'm still a little unsure what I'm doing is there some way to check that I've done it right? Thanks in advance for your help. --
164:
if there is no mention of private schools one can safely assume there aren't any. on the same token, it might as well have said
Hamersley has no universities or medical research facilities.
585:
271:
I'm fairly new to everything and am looking forward to contributing to
Knowledge (XXG). One question I had and was hoping you can answer is how do I get a user page started? Thanks! --
321:
I'm not exactly new, though I haven't made a huge number of changes (editing for some years, actually signed up July 2006). I'm totally embarrassed I forgot to sign my last changes.
212:
Thanks very much for looking out for this one - I've been out of the city and nowhere near internet for days, so it came as a big surprise that these major changes are taking place.
161:
everywhere in
Australia uses the same voting system! or do people really care about the scientific name of every plant species in every suburb? I think not. This is verbose too
692:
680:
453:. There is no assertion of notability made in the article. The reviewing admin will probably reject the speedy if there are signs of notability, afterwards it would lead to
451:
It is an article about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject.
227:
352:
top of the page. This will automatically remove the article from the category of articles needing to be wikified. More information can be found here:
742:
177:
locality entry should include that info. or perhaps that people drive on left hand side of the road. my point is that info for a locality should be
195:
230:. I hope you don't mind me posting this on your talk page, but I know some people probably don't watchlist everything they ever edit. Thanks,
428:
I guess I agree with that reasoning. However it is a matter of limits. If ttn is added, then all the news and current affairs programs at
541:
where there is nothing said about showing notability being on the person who claims something unnotable. The article itself also meets
284:. Or click on your username on the top right hand corner of the screen. It will be blank initially, but you can add material to it.
77:
please do not feel any real need to answer. Comments on opinions at afd should generally be expressed at afd, not user talk pages.
369:
More generally, you can copy edit or cleanup articles. It requires no authorisation or removal or addition to lists. Remember to
357:
651:
Point taken, I have copied that section to my own page and will work on it there and copy it back. Thanks for your comments
504:
And what am I supposed to gain from that? Blog posts and an incredibly short article of him complaining about something?
621:
429:
116:
749:
when it's done. Please come around when you get the chance, and give me feedback on how I can improve. Thanks again,
324:
Someday I'll have to actually make a home page here. Thanks for the helpful suggestions. See you around the site :-)
47:
38:
17:
226:
Seeing as you're currently opposing me because of my lack of article writing, I would appreciate if you looked at
432:
should be added, along with Behind the News, which is a lot more than there is in the template at the moment.
237:
184:. you should see that this line should not be added to every locality in Australia where wool is mentioned.
767:
746:
731:
702:
655:
645:
628:
610:
579:
563:
525:
495:
463:
436:
422:
406:
395:
377:
364:
345:
330:
306:
297:
288:
275:
261:
247:
216:
213:
202:
188:
168:
151:
136:
95:
83:
69:
724:
720:
433:
403:
374:
361:
303:
285:
547:
If you disagree with this, you must prevent some real sign of notability, not a link to a list of blogs
575:
559:
521:
491:
459:
92:
66:
485:
here is on you- you allege that the subject is notable, thus you must provide notability. Please see
696:
688:
241:
745:. I've withdrawn it, and will be writing up an "analysis" of it, which will soon be available at
342:
199:
185:
165:
148:
573:
Simply put, no, it is not. Ask any administrator, I'm done trying to get this into your head. --
670:
717:
133:
764:
607:
486:
370:
258:
113:
545:- again the one listed on the template, which says that the article asserts no notability.
454:
353:
750:
625:
593:
482:
173:
You said " We can't assume readers will know the systems and practices of
Australia" then
542:
327:
538:
728:
652:
642:
634:
126:
I was just about to say that somebody already reverted his edits. :) Have a nice day
443:
419:
127:
549:. It is NOT on the editor who claims something to not meet notability to research
257:
Thanks for my first ever wiki award!! I'll keep on keeping on, same back at ya. -
392:
294:
272:
181:
to that locality. Using your argument, I should have not made this delete today
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
758:
691:
and his romp of
Knowledge (XXG)-editing otters thank you for participating in
601:
79:
553:, let alone spend their time going on a potential wild goose chase to
231:
506:
The burden of showing notability is on those that intend to prove it
473:
are the one who is supposed to establish notability on a subject,
449:
To be blunt, the answer you're looking for is in the template.
418:
current affairs programs, was removed for an unstated reason.
25:
586:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Age of Mythology
741:
Hi, Recurring dreams, and thanks for your participation in
293:
Many thanks for the quick response. Much appreciated. --
620:
Thank you for moving 'Mordialloc secondary college' to
282:
182:
162:
159:
112:
thx for helping me keep wikipedia vandal-free tonite! -
489:, and feel free to ask me if you have any questions --
515:. In addition, the article is overwhelmingly written
727:all of you have guided my Wiki training thus far.
336:Thanks for the welcome; and now, a question...
8:
668:
413:ttn is a news and current affairs program
196:Western Australian Legislative Assembly
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
693:Hammer's failed request for adminship
7:
358:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wikify
24:
386:Some one is deleting my articles!
669:
513:those that say it does not exist
29:
198:. that is what links are for.
1:
477:the person who sees that you
469:The research is yours to do.
281:Hi! You're user page is here
622:Mordialloc Secondary College
430:ABC News and Current Affairs
107:
783:
18:User talk:Recurring dreams
768:04:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
732:06:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
703:17:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
675:
656:11:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
646:13:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
629:00:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
611:00:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
580:02:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
564:02:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
526:02:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
496:02:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
464:02:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
437:12:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
423:11:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
407:12:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
396:02:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
378:14:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
365:14:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
346:14:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
331:01:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
307:07:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
298:07:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
289:07:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
276:07:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
70:09:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
262:19:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
248:02:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
217:04:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
203:13:31, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
189:13:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
169:12:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
152:12:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
137:03:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
117:09:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
96:10:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
84:00:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
267:Thanks for the welcome
721:User:Recurring dreams
42:of past discussions.
747:User:Giggy/RfA/Giggy
555:do your work for you
711:Seeking your advice
689:User:TenPoundHammer
245:(Let's Go Yankees!)
725:User:Golden Wattle
718:User:Orderinchaos
708:
707:
246:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
774:
761:
755:
699:
698:Ten Pound Hammer
673:
666:
665:
604:
598:
434:Recurring dreams
404:Recurring dreams
375:Recurring dreams
362:Recurring dreams
304:Recurring dreams
286:Recurring dreams
236:
122:Waverley College
108:rv'ing vandalism
33:
32:
26:
782:
781:
777:
776:
775:
773:
772:
771:
763:
759:
751:
739:
713:
697:
664:
638:
618:
606:
602:
594:
589:
578:
562:
524:
494:
483:burden of proof
479:plainly haven't
462:
447:
415:
388:
338:
319:
269:
255:
244:
224:
222:Article writing
144:
124:
110:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
780:
778:
757:
738:
735:
712:
709:
706:
705:
685:
684:
676:
674:
663:
660:
659:
658:
637:
632:
617:
614:
600:
588:
583:
574:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
558:
531:
530:
529:
528:
520:
499:
498:
490:
458:
446:
441:
440:
439:
414:
411:
410:
409:
387:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
337:
334:
318:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
268:
265:
254:
251:
240:
223:
220:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
143:
140:
123:
120:
109:
106:
105:
104:
103:
102:
101:
100:
99:
98:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
779:
770:
769:
766:
762:
756:
754:
748:
744:
736:
734:
733:
730:
726:
722:
719:
710:
704:
700:
694:
690:
687:
686:
683:
682:
677:
672:
667:
661:
657:
654:
650:
649:
648:
647:
644:
636:
635:Ken Ticehurst
633:
631:
630:
627:
623:
615:
613:
612:
609:
605:
599:
597:
587:
584:
582:
581:
577:
565:
561:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
527:
523:
518:
514:
511:
507:
503:
502:
501:
500:
497:
493:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
465:
461:
456:
452:
445:
442:
438:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
421:
412:
408:
405:
400:
399:
398:
397:
394:
385:
379:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
363:
359:
355:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
335:
333:
332:
329:
325:
322:
316:
308:
305:
301:
300:
299:
296:
292:
291:
290:
287:
283:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
266:
264:
263:
260:
252:
250:
249:
243:
239:
235:
234:
229:
221:
219:
218:
215:
204:
201:
200:Michellecrisp
197:
192:
191:
190:
187:
186:Michellecrisp
183:
180:
176:
172:
171:
170:
167:
166:Michellecrisp
163:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
149:Michellecrisp
141:
139:
138:
135:
134:
131:
130:
121:
119:
118:
115:
97:
94:
89:
88:
87:
86:
85:
82:
81:
76:
75:
74:
73:
72:
71:
68:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
752:
740:
714:
678:
639:
619:
595:
590:
572:
554:
550:
546:
516:
512:
509:
505:
478:
474:
470:
450:
448:
444:Sajeeb Wazed
416:
389:
339:
326:
323:
320:
302:No problem.
270:
256:
232:
225:
214:Orderinchaos
211:
178:
174:
145:
132:
128:
125:
111:
78:
63:
55:
43:
37:
517:as a resume
259:Superbeecat
114:Superbeecat
93:Sploooshman
67:Sploooshman
36:This is an
626:DavidCooke
616:Mordy High
328:alexfiles
142:Hamersley
729:AusBrian
653:AusBrian
643:AusBrian
551:anything
539:see this
253:barnstar
238:Contribs
179:specific
662:Thanks!
487:WP:CITE
420:matturn
371:be bold
343:Banny83
317:Thanks!
39:archive
743:my RfA
737:My RfA
723:&
481:. The
455:WP:AFD
393:Pezzar
354:WP:WFY
295:Jeffss
273:Jeffss
753:Giggy
596:Giggy
543:WP:A7
175:every
129:Gizza
16:<
519:. --
356:and
228:this
701:•
681:RFA
679:My
557:. -
510:not
475:not
471:you
80:DGG
60:AFD
508:,
457:--
391:--
373:.
360:.
765:P
760:U
608:P
603:U
576:L
560:L
522:L
492:L
460:L
242:@
233:R
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.