1215:
whether Geaves is a reliable source and whether this is contentious. I can't see how it could be construed as contentious. This information probably belongs in the
Teachings section. The Teachings Section was separated from the Pre Rawat article and given it's own article as you must know. That 'Teachings of PR' article itself reads to me as extremely biased. Not surprising as it was largely compiled by Jossi and Momento. I think that article is in dire need of missing balance too. Whether I have time to work on that is another question. I have a brief hiatus between my return from holiday and getting back to the grist of work. I imagine my time will be quite limited from henceforth. Anyway, I feel more comfortable to take a back seat since Momento has been again exiled. I find the other premie contributors quite reasonable on the whole.
261:"Who is Guru? The highest manifestation of God is Guru. So when Guru is here, God is here, to whom will you give your devotion?" "God made the mind but He never made a stoplight. And when He saw that 'There is no stop in this mind which I have made,' He was very sorry. He had to take a form. The form of Guru is nobody but Himself, the whole that you want to see. The whole power is now in the form of a body. That is the body which is the 'Supremest' of all, and its duties, works are not like those of humanity." "To be here as individuals, and yet to be able to be next to the person who is everything; in which everything is, and he is in everything. Guru Maharaji. The Lord. All powerful."
1168:
also available on one of the web archive sites but I wouldn't be surprised if it's been removed from them by now. I guess Jossi may have engineered that when we the same subject came up here a while back and we used that site to support the lineage thing. I'll see if I can dig anything else up when I'm back. BTW I think the Geaves paper is perfectly legimate as a source and that states clearly that the info was on MJ's website. I happen to possess this paper which I could share as pdf on return. cheers.
1440:
fight to get an evidently historical fact recognised in article that erred just a little too far into the realms of revisionism). Seems his input was a one-off though - Wales has stated that he won't be editing the article again (one has to wonder why, considering the splash his edit has made). Perhaps he only wanted to give the impression that he only gives an occasional toss about the misuse of
Knowledge by cultists - such as former Wiki golden-boy Jossi Fresco. You advise that
660:
simply to take a light-hearted break - the latter being my motive for linking to the site in question - a site which does indeed make fun of the "obese cult leader" in question. It is common knowledge among other editors of the article 'Prem Rawat', that you are in fact Mr Rawat's webmaster, and you have declared that you do indeed have a conflict of interest in matters relating to him.
664:
description of a notable public figure simply because it doesn't conform with your own inflated opinion of him. Contentious material it may be - to those who share your opinion of Prem Rawat - but since when has that been a criterion of what people are allowed to talk about? Remember it is my talkpage that this is about - not a Wiki article.
890:"Sounds like you're looking for someone to hold your sword while you fall on it. Well, having declared your conflict of interest, you could do the decent thing and leave the article about your employer well alone. You could, couldn't you? Or would that entail you having to relinquish your 'position' with your paymasters?"
1496:
I see. So your comment has nothing to do with
Knowledge's purpose, but is your own opinion regarding contemporary politics. In that case you should not have removed the limitation. If doublethink was the act of ordinary people in Orwell's mind, it's not for us as editors to redefine the word based on
1254:
No offence taken of course. Goring is nice and quiet compared to the urbanity of
Brighton. One thing that's good about Knowledge is that there is this kind of growing understanding (almost like morphic resonance or something?) about practising neutrality. I'm quite enjoying being a part of that noble
1234:
I'm tempted to say something along the lines of: "You chill, brother", but that'd be quite at odds with street credibility. (Mine, that is. I know nothing of the patois in the environs of
Brighton, though my sister lives just along the coast in Goring. Probably chalk and cheese. though.) Hope you
568:
policy. You can check the edit history yourself; this seems to confirm it. I can't comment as to whether his efforts in crafting the policy have any motive other than just making a good working policy, but as I've already said, I think the portion of BLP that's being invoked here may have undesired
789:
And I've just noticed that you've deleted my response to Travis from your talk-page as well, yet left his accusations there. That is a serious denial of right to reply, Jossi, and you should reinstate my response to FCYTravis' serious accusations immediately. Here, for the record, is what you have
1538:
I was not contesting your change and had no plans to change it back. I was merely talking about reasons to change a
Knowledge article and reasons not to, in response to what you said. However, I do object to your personal attack on me. I see you've done this sort of thing before. I don't appreciate
1415:
Could you please try to tone down the jocular postings? It's easy to write comments that sound amusing to oneself, but which fall flat on the written page. Some of your comments about "weasel words" give the appearance of picking a fight. I'm sure that's incorrect. Nevertheless, it'd be best if you
1167:
Hi there Revera - I have extremely limited access to internet as I'm abroad right now and reception is very dodgy. The website was live circa 1990 and was I believe, the one Jossi helped him build. It was taken down at some point but was live for quite a long time around then. I recall that it was
1059:
I can't find any information on HDSK. The "About us" page says they've been around since 1991, but doesn't mention Elan Vital. I'm not sure what to do at this point. The
Knowledge article is about Elan Vital. If we have a source connecting them then we can add whatever it says. Maybe we should wait
349:
I'm not able to change your mind, I can only give you the facts. In
Hinduism, and we are talking Gurus here, Gurus are said to be "greater than God" because they lead to God. So if God is the Almighty, the Guru is the Almighty Plus. It's a pity you didn't include this sentence "A Lord is a male who
1439:
That is what I posted, Will. A simple fact. Nothing jocular about it. Then another editor describes me as posting 'weasel words'. I defended myself against that impertinent allegation. Just whose fight are you taking sides with here? The one that Jim Wales started? (which, by the way, was a
1140:
Persistence? Moi? I hardly ever dip a toe into the waters of Wiki, Will. If you don't mind me saying so, you're persistence - personified! (and personally, I think
Knowledge's a better place for it). Mind you, there's a couple of old contributors whose return after a lengthy absence is shortly
840:
And as for your input, FCYTravis: you speak of "violation" and "abuse"? That's pretty strong language. And this is the first I have heard of it. Are your accusations addressed to me? If so why place them on another editor's talk-page? (who is not my 'friend', as you wrongly assume). I request that
663:
Your censorship of part of my discussion with fellow-editor Mael-Num is quite remarkable. Is this a precedent that you are setting for
Knowledge? Are talk-pages going to be subject to the NPOV rule too? Quite frankly it's ridiculous that you should try and abuse our freedom of speech by removing a
274:
There is an understanding in some sects that if the devotee were presented with the guru and God, first he would pay respect to the guru, since the guru had been instrumental in leading him to God. Gurus are said to be greater than God because they lead to God. Some traditions claim "Guru, God and
591:
Hmmm, I guess I'll just have to respect your respect for Judge Dredd! But what do you make of Jossi's apparent attempt to emulate him? It appears to me that he's just removed all reference to the WP:BLP discussion from his talk page. At least, I can't seem to find it, though it was there a few
514:
You should be able to say what you'd like on your own talk page. Moreover, you should be able to say what was removed because it's not being presented as factual (which is the case in a biographical article, and arguably talk pages related to that article) and the only comment that is related to
146:
Rest assured, I have taken the trouble of preparing myself for what I consider to be a serious and responsible task - and touchstones from the links you so kindly reminded me of are ones that I intend to keep in mind whenever contributing to this project. I'd like to post them here, if only as a
518:
All that aside, I just don't like the way that phrase in the BLP is being applied here. It should be struck, as it can be (and in this case, is being) used to censor speech in a manner that is at the very least counterproductive to the goals of Knowledge. Such a rule could be invoked by anyone
1214:
Thanks Revera. Interesting to be able to see the whole site preserved in the 'Akashic Records' or internet equivalent! As you can see I've re-opened the discussion. I think that this source simply lends weight to the idea that it is relevant to include the information. The question only remains
659:
Whether you consider the site I linked to be poorly researched or not, you should not have the right to interfere with my communication with another editor in this way. Editors need to refer to other sites for many reasons - for research, to gain another perspective on a subject, even sometimes
651:
I see that you, Jossi, have taken the liberty of censoring part of a discussion I had with another editor on my talk-page. You did this with no warning, and no explanation other than to cite WP-BLP- 'Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material'. You removed two things - a link to an
250:
Momento, you have selected some quotes that support your opinion. But in doing so you make transparent your bias. It's blatantly clear that, by omitting quotes that demonstrate that Rawat made claims to divinity which are relevant and notable, a very bright spotlight is shone on the supposed
510:
Honestly, I'm not sure how that would apply here. You make an excellent argument that the information, as presented, is not biographical in nature. In the spirit of what Jimbo recommended (which is what BLP policy was written to formalize), there's nothing wrong going on here. You're not
798:
Trolling? Jossi, that is so far from reality, I can hardly believe you're accusing me of it. The facts are these: 1. You censored my talkpage. 2. I asked you why you had done so. 3. You neglected to answer me. 4. I requested that you address my question. 5. You deleted my question from the
1487:
Sorry for the long delay in replying, I rarely log in to wikipedia these days. To answer your question, the topical mention of IDS was just an aside, though as an accomplished proponent of doublethink, he's a fine example. For someone with his political record to identify with being a
904:
Boy, oh boy, the Knowledge policy on this competes with the best Dutch cheeses! (and no, I'm not attacking you, I'm drawing attention to the vagiaries of Wiki-policy. And I wasn't attacking Jossi either. My intention was to bring attention to his evident evasion of Wikipedian
667:
We are all entitled to our opinions, and we should be free to express those opinions to each other on our talkpages. You seem to think you can take it on yourself to police my communications with a fellow editor in such a high-handed manner, it almost beggars belief!
1027:
has always been a prominent feature of Guru Maharaj Ji/Prem Rawat's claim to fame. Those of us who might have a better understanding of history - and how it can repeat itself - might care to take that into consideration. Especially given his 'messianic' history!
1395:
I think the best place for a discussion about the pensions article is the Talk page of the article itself. I actually think there are pros and cons of CPI and wage inflation as measures of the pension worth, and would be happy to contribute on the talk page.
378:
That is more than a claim to being able to "lead people to God" (and by the perverse semi-logic that some Hindu teachings apply, thereby being 'greater than'). Rawat was not just any old Hindu guru who, in their controversial arrogance, liked to claim to be
1515:
Show me a quote where Orwell implies that doublethink can only be used by "ordinary people". Then show me evidence that a politician like IDS thinks of himself as ordinary. Then take your perceived "Crimethink" back to the Ministry of Love and chew on it!
1468:
I agree with your removing the limitation. But could you explain what you're talking about with the rest of it (Iain Duncan Smith, etc.)? I don't understand the reference. I understand he's a British politician. But what has this to do with editing the
1122:. If the HDSK gains more prominence we may have to rethink how we arrange the topics and content. Probably the next step would be to create a section in the Elan Vital article for HDSK. And perhaps the US group will change its name too. We'll see.
515:
Rawat (obese) was presented in a humorous style, which is parody and therefore protected speech which is not defamatory by legal standards. At least not in the US. Even if it wasn't considered parody, it's true and correct, so either way you win.
411:
Thank you for taking the time to express your kind words on my talk page. I've found that making a stand for what I feel is right can sometimes be frustrating when facing an entrenched opposition. Your encouraging note helped make a difference.
219:… we do not try to decide or claim that an opinion is "true" or "false". We state instead, neutrally and factually, which people hold what views, and allow the facts to speak for themselves. Remember, Facts are never subject to consensus.
779:
Good grief! Despite your efforts to remove this issue from the records, your actions are saying a great deal more about you - and your methods of stifling debate - than you might realise. And are you going to attempt to delete even
965:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
368:"The form of Guru is nobody but Himself, the whole that you want to see. The whole power is now in the form of a body. That is the body which is the 'Supremest' of all, and its duties, works are not like those of humanity"
569:
effects and consequences. For that reason alone, I think it should be revisited. You know, even though we're not admins here, we can have input in Knowledge's policies. You may want to take this up on BLP's talk page.
522:
I can't tell you what to do at this point, but like I said and detailed above, I think you've got at least a few pretty good reasons why you should be able to preserve what was written on your page if you choose to.
869:
Try to focus on the content and not the contributors. I understand it can be a heated and touchy topic, however insults and related commentary about other editors is unwelcome on Knowledge. Please try to keep your
1235:
don't take too much offense at my comment on the Prem Rawat talkpage following your recent comment, but partisan ain't the way, I'm sure you'd agree, no matter how much our histories might coincide. Be well.
706:
I recently (6th May) asked you several questions about your censorship of my talk-page in relation to WP:BLP and contentious material. As you have not yet addressed that question I consider the matter to be
231:
Jossi, you evidently have much time at your disposal to edit here. I don't. But I hope both of us can respect the spirit (at least) of the excerpts from the Knowledge guidelines that I've posted above.
677:
It's been four days since my request. In the absence of any action/response from you to my concerns above, Jossi, I have restored the paragraph to its original form myself. Revera 07:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
901:
Also interesting that my observations and questions re. Jossi were judged by you as "personal attack". I could say the same of your accusation of me, couldn't I? But that wouldn't be NPOV, would it!
337:
Your response does not answer my question. Either your sophistry is bordering on being willfully deceptive, or perhaps you are simply in denial. Neither should be attributes of a Knowledge editor.
204:… when it is clear to readers that we do not expect them to adopt any particular opinion, this leaves them free to make up their minds for themselves, thus encouraging intellectual independence.
519:
seeking to produce a chilling effect towards critics of any given biographical subject, throwing all hopes for NPOV out the window. That and I've never been partial to the thought police.
383:. The Sant Mat tradition had plenty of contenders for that title. Rawat pretended - to a Western audience - to BE God. Are there any other Hindu gurus who had the chutzpah to do that?
422:
I find battling with Rawat's promotion team can get a bit too time-consuming (not that I get too caught up in it). For a breather, I like to take a look at contributions to sites like
437:"The things which are true must be said, and your ability to keep cool and keep thinking and writing on the subject in hand, without being too thrown off balance by the barrage ..."'
1115:
Thanks for your persistence. I also checked the HDSK website and after much searching found a page there that mentions Elan Vital too. I've added a sentence to cover the name change.
275:
Self (Self meaning soul, not personality) are one and the same. In this context, saints and poets in India, have expressed their views about the relationship between Guru and God:
495:
thanks for the suggestion, Andries, but personally, I find that identifying with labels such as "Wikipedian" and "ex-premie" doesn't really float my boat, if you get my drift!
760:
But you have NOT told me, Jossi. By your own admission you responded to Andries, whose involvement in this I was not even aware of until today. Why respond to him, and not me?
460:
174:
It is not asserted that the most popular view or some sort of intermediate view among the different views is the correct one. Readers are left to form their own opinions.
1488:'compassionate conservative' is one of the clearest modern-day examples of the use of doublethink I've found. Why is this my opinion? This article may help to explain:
189:
As the name suggests the neutral point of view is a point of view. It is a point of view that is neutral - that is neither sympathetic nor in opposition to its subject.
841:
any further communication you wish to have with me on this matter be put on my own talk-page, rather than his. That way I might see it. Revera 21:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
1301:
and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.
105:
449:
Again, thank you. When life's getting to you, there's nothing quite like a picture of an obese cult leader in a funny hat to turn a frown upside-down. ;)
543:
Can it really be true that Jossi is the one who's re-writing the self-same BLP Policy? Does he know what the word "contentious" means? Is Judge Dredd (
923:
afterthought - if an editor abuses Knowledge guidelines, and is 'brought to task' for having done so, does that constitute 'personal attack"? Hmmm?
313:
No, momento, Lord God, Lord almighty, God almighty, Lord all-powerful - all are terms which any sane person would accept refer to the same thing.
1489:
1343:
1296:
479:
1097:
Thanks. If we can find a source that connects the two then we can add something to the article. A web redirect probably isn't sufficient.
1280:
483:
1437:
Doesn't change the fact that, over his "career" as a whole, the media has often described Rawat as a cult leader, as Jim Wales observed.'
100:
74:
1350:(which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the
50:
1347:
1292:
323:"In a religious concept, The Lord is a name referring to God, mainly by the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Islam, and Christianity)"
1339:
962:
849:
Kindly reinstate my response as it was originally given Jossi. If you refuse to do so, then heaven help the future of Knowledge.
615:- but that was long before my contribution to the paragraph. I wonder what he's playing at? And how to take him to task on it?
653:
423:
874:
and if you feel unable to comment in a civil fashion, focus on other wiki articles and tasks until you feel calmer. Be well.
472:
1287:
was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of
1383:
1379:
1351:
263:
I'd love to see you try and explain how the meaning of the words "The Lord all powerful" and "God" are so very different!
1291:
is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the
17:
572:
And as an aside, I like Judge Dredd. Even the Stallone movie. I smile every time I hear his "I am the law!" line. ;)
773:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Jossi&oldid=130875508#Why_have_you_deleted_my_question_to_you.3F
362:
Momento, he was educated in a Catholic College and was addressing an American audience at the time he claimed to be
821:
You need to explain yourself Jossi, and your actions - after your break, naturally. Revera 20:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
1346:. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the
1141:
anticipated. I wonder what the future holds for all the Rawat-related articles! It'll be interesting to watch.
95:
90:
46:
1001:
Thank you very much for the link to this article. It would have otherwise slipped completely under my radar.
716:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AJossi&diff=128722960&oldid=128534922#Contentious.2FBLP
647:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AJossi&diff=128799130&oldid=128598905#Contentious.2FBLP
1355:
544:
111:
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on
1490:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/21/iain-duncan-smith-empty-truth-compassionate-conservatism
1198:
656:
and a reference made by the other editor to an "obese cult leader", replacing both with "..." (an ellipsis).
130:
1047:
Just for the record, Jossi has been blocked indefinitely for "abusively using one or more accounts". See
461:
Knowledge:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Bad_faith_or_overzealous_BLP_enforcement_by_user:Jossi
85:
67:
1423:
1401:
1129:
1104:
1067:
671:
I request that you restore the passage in question to its original form. Revera 19:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
948:
894:
Well, Vassyana, it's interesting to note that my suggestion is now being taken more seriously, viz:
1288:
944:
435:
P.S. I've just read something in which the author makes a point which I wish I had found earlier:
350:
has power and authority. It can have different meanings depending on the context of use". Exactly.
61:
39:
1375:
1011:
884:
This is the full text of what I said to Jossi, upon hearing him declare his conflict of interest:
35:
895:
143:
Thank you for your welcome, Jossi, but since when has editing an encylopedia been down to luck?
1183:
I look forward to any further light you might be able to shed on this when you're back, Pat.
971:
692:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AJossi&diff=130324547&oldid=130293611
1544:
1502:
1478:
1418:
1397:
1124:
1099:
1062:
959:, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
955:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
654:
http://hamzen1.proboards27.com/index.cgi?board=duh&action=display&thread=1161430405
424:
http://hamzen1.proboards27.com/index.cgi?board=duh&action=display&thread=1161430405
750:
745:. Any and all further messages from you in this regard will be excised from my talk page.
742:
126:
112:
354:
301:
1260:
1220:
1173:
871:
251:"neutrality" of your position as editor, and your subsequent influence on the article.
57:
535:
Thanks for responding - and so quickly! I've given Jossi something to think about at
511:
presenting defamatory or false information, which was/is obviously Jimbo's concern.
1362:
1305:
1007:
875:
578:
565:
526:
450:
413:
967:
688:
Yet more censorship by Jossi - he has now removed the following from his talk page:
486:
463:
426:
Words can often play second-fiddle when faced with a good picture essay! Regards,
351:
298:
612:
1466:
Have removed limitation in the wake of Iain Duncan Smith's resignation yesterday.
1318:
No obligation to contribute, is there? I don't know what you're thanking me for!
810:
And now my attempt to get to the bottom of this is, according to you, "trolling"?
1540:
1517:
1498:
1474:
1445:
1319:
1236:
1201:
1184:
1142:
1084:
1029:
982:
924:
908:
852:
727:
719:
616:
593:
552:
496:
440:
427:
395:
338:
233:
1497:
our own experiences or opinions, or based on our view of subsequent history. -
564:
It's been mentioned before that Jossi was one of the major contributors to the
1284:
746:
122:
1197:
Blimey! No sooner have I written that, than I find what we're looking for:
1004:
If you'll indulge an old hand who's been a long time AWOL, how goes the war?
453:
22:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC Source for the term "cult leader" is Saul Levine
1256:
1216:
1169:
956:
611:
It seems he archived it with the last comment being made on 18 April, see -
545:
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pilot/issues/1995/vp950701/06300060.htm
159:
All significant points of view are presented, not just the most popular one.
21:
1199:
http://web.archive.org/web/19991012111809/maharaji.org/masters/masters.htm
118:
You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.
701:"you should leave current, ongoing discussions on the existing talk page"
1342:
concerning Prem Rawat 5, to which you were listed as a party, has been
961:
710:
What's more - when you moved the section to your archive, you in fact
290:
It's my great fortune that I found Satguru, all my doubts are removed.
613:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Jossi/Archives/15#Contentious.2FBLP
30:
Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Knowledge experience:
1548:
1525:
1506:
1482:
1453:
1442:"It'd be best if you could make your comments more, um, boring. ;)"
1429:
1405:
1369:
1327:
1312:
1264:
1244:
1224:
1209:
1192:
1177:
1150:
1135:
1110:
1092:
1073:
1037:
1015:
990:
975:
932:
916:
878:
855:
754:
730:
722:
718:
details the passage you have 'disappeared' What's the game, Jossi?
619:
596:
581:
555:
529:
499:
489:
466:
443:
430:
416:
398:
341:
236:
134:
952:
741:
I have nothing else to tell you that I have not told you already.
536:
1079:
On WP's 'Elan Vital' page, the link to their UK site is given as
1119:
1060:
until the situation is clearer, but I'm open minded about it.
1048:
636:
I wonder how the following got left off his so-called 'archive'?
281:
Guru and God both appear before me. To whom should I prostrate?
81:
Also, here are some pointers to learn more about this project:
256:
No. I have selected quotes that represent Rawat's view on God.
1020:
War? Well, there's war and there's war (words vs swords?)
896:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/06/the_cult_of_wikipedia
548:
1080:
943:
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
947:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
696:== What's with this 'selective archiving' idea, Jossi? ==
537:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Jossi#Contentious.2FBLP
246:
communication with Momento re. Rawat's claims to divinity
981:
OK. It's been a while since I've contributed. Thanks.
326:
1116:
867:
772:
715:
691:
646:
480:
Category:Wikipedians_who_used_to_follow_Sathya_Sai_Baba
293:
I bow before Guru. Guru's glory is greater than God's.
484:
Category:Wikipedians_who_used_to_follow_Guru_Maharaji
769:you censor my request for an explanation from you:
66:Knowledge has a vibrant community of editors. The
1444:Is that the advice you'd proffer Jim Wales too?
743:See responses given to Andries about this subject
45:When you have some free time, take a look at the
1416:could make your comments more, um, boring. ;)
1083:If you click on it, it redirects you to HDSK.
106:Knowledge:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
714:my contribution from that section! This link
8:
284:I bow before Guru who introduced God to me.
1051:for example of one of his sockpuppets.
473:Category:Wikipedians by former religion
1049:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Pergamino
70:is a great place to see the goings on.
60:, feel free to post a question at the
866:Please refrain from personal attacks.
7:
121:Best of luck, and have fun editing!
1275:Request for mediation of Prem Rawat
549:http://en.wikipedia.org/Judge_Dredd
101:Knowledge:Be bold in updating pages
1118:I've also created a redirect from
482:You may be interested in creating
455:s article in Marc Galanter's book
245:
77:, and, most importantly, have fun!
38:, and perhaps dabble a bit in the
14:
960:
327:http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Lord
268:Certainly. From Wiki on Gurus -
1391:Pensions in the United Kingdom
1334:Request for mediation rejected
392:And the above quotes prove it.
53:. They can come in very handy!
1:
1454:12:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
1361:For the Mediation Committee,
1265:10:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
1151:20:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
1136:22:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
1111:20:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1093:20:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
991:17:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
976:17:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
933:16:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
917:15:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
444:21:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
431:20:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
417:19:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
399:21:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
355:19:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
342:12:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
302:05:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
1549:17:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
1526:17:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
1507:13:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
1430:22:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
1406:12:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
1386:to perform case management.)
1074:19:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
1378:, an automated bot account
1374:(This message delivered by
1298:guide to mediation requests
1283:of the dispute relating to
1245:17:24, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
1225:17:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
1210:09:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
1193:09:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
1178:16:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
1569:
1483:19:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
1043:Jossi blocked indefinitely
784:comment from the archives?
500:07:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
490:01:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
34:First, take a look at the
1370:23:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
1328:21:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
1163:Maharaji.org website date
1038:20:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
652:external webpage, namely
237:00:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
135:23:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
96:Knowledge:Brilliant prose
91:Knowledge:Policy trifecta
1521:
1449:
1323:
1313:11:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
1240:
1205:
1188:
1146:
1088:
1081:http://elanvital.org.uk/
1033:
1016:12:39, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
986:
928:
912:
879:02:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
856:22:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
755:21:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
731:19:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
723:09:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
685:Update as of 13 May 2007
620:20:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
597:20:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
467:20:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
75:be bold in editing pages
790:deleted from that page:
699:WP:ARCHIVE states that
582:20:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
556:19:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
530:01:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
364:"the Lord all-powerful"
51:Policies and Guidelines
1356:mediation mailing list
1348:mediation request page
86:Knowledge:Five pillars
1352:Committee chairperson
1340:Request for mediation
1255:thrust. :-) Cheers!
506:Re: BLP and Deletion
1384:Mediation Committee
1354:or e-mailed to the
1025:"Peace in our time"
1023:The possibility of
1473:Knowledge page? -
439:You get the idea.
36:Knowledge Tutorial
997:The Register, Eh?
939:Your recent edits
753:
133:
27:Welcome, Revera!
1560:
1460:Doublethink edit
1426:
1421:
1387:
1367:
1310:
1281:formal mediation
1132:
1127:
1107:
1102:
1070:
1065:
964:
862:Personal attacks
749:
381:greater than God
125:
56:If you need any
1568:
1567:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1493:
1462:
1424:
1419:
1413:
1393:
1373:
1363:
1336:
1306:
1277:
1165:
1130:
1125:
1105:
1100:
1068:
1063:
1057:
1045:
999:
951:by typing four
949:sign your posts
941:
864:
739:
508:
476:
409:
248:
47:Manual of Style
25:
12:
11:
5:
1566:
1564:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1510:
1509:
1486:
1461:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1412:
1409:
1392:
1389:
1372:
1335:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1279:A request for
1276:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1056:
1053:
1044:
1041:
998:
995:
994:
993:
940:
937:
936:
935:
920:
919:
906:
902:
899:
892:
886:
885:
863:
860:
859:
858:
850:
846:
845:
844:
843:
825:
824:
823:
822:
814:
813:
812:
811:
804:
803:
802:
801:
792:
791:
786:
785:
776:
775:
770:
762:
761:
738:
735:
734:
733:
725:
708:
704:
697:
694:
689:
686:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
576:
575:
574:
573:
570:
559:
558:
540:
539:
507:
504:
503:
502:
475:
470:
447:
446:
433:
408:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
393:
387:
386:
385:
384:
373:
372:
371:
370:
347:
346:
345:
344:
332:
331:
330:
329:
317:
316:
315:
314:
307:
305:
304:
295:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
276:
271:
270:
262:
259:
258:
247:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
151:
150:
149:
148:
144:
109:
108:
103:
98:
93:
88:
79:
78:
71:
64:
54:
43:
24:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1565:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1495:
1494:
1491:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1467:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1428:
1427:
1422:
1410:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1359:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1302:
1300:
1299:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1274:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1200:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1162:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1128:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1109:
1108:
1103:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1066:
1054:
1052:
1050:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1002:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
977:
973:
969:
963:
958:
954:
950:
946:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
921:
918:
914:
910:
907:
903:
900:
897:
893:
891:
888:
887:
883:
882:
881:
880:
877:
873:
868:
861:
857:
854:
851:
848:
847:
842:
838:
837:
835:
834:
832:
831:
829:
828:
826:
820:
819:
818:
817:
815:
809:
808:
807:
806:
800:
796:
795:
794:
793:
788:
787:
783:
778:
777:
774:
771:
768:
764:
763:
759:
758:
757:
756:
752:
748:
744:
736:
732:
729:
726:
724:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
702:
698:
695:
693:
690:
687:
684:
683:
682:
679:
675:
672:
669:
665:
661:
657:
655:
649:
648:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
621:
618:
614:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
598:
595:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
580:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
557:
554:
551:) his hero?!
550:
546:
542:
541:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
505:
501:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
488:
485:
481:
474:
471:
469:
468:
465:
462:
457:
456:
452:
445:
442:
438:
434:
432:
429:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
406:
400:
397:
394:
391:
390:
389:
388:
382:
377:
376:
375:
374:
369:
366:. And more:
365:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
343:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
328:
324:
321:
320:
319:
318:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
303:
300:
297:
296:
292:
289:
286:
283:
280:
277:
273:
272:
269:
266:
265:
264:
257:
254:
253:
252:
238:
235:
230:
229:
228:
227:
220:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
190:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
175:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
152:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
138:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
116:
114:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
76:
72:
69:
65:
63:
59:
55:
52:
48:
44:
41:
37:
33:
32:
31:
28:
23:
19:
16:
1470:
1465:
1463:
1441:
1436:
1417:
1414:
1394:
1376:MediationBot
1364:
1360:
1337:
1307:
1303:
1297:
1293:request page
1278:
1233:
1166:
1123:
1098:
1061:
1058:
1046:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1006:
1003:
1000:
942:
889:
865:
839:
836:
833:
830:
827:
816:
805:
797:
781:
766:
740:
711:
700:
680:
676:
673:
670:
666:
662:
658:
650:
645:
577:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
477:
458:
454:
448:
436:
410:
380:
367:
363:
348:
322:
306:
267:
260:
255:
249:
218:
203:
188:
173:
158:
120:
117:
113:my talk page
110:
80:
68:village pump
29:
26:
1471:Doublethink
1464:You wrote,
1420:Will Beback
1398:Phil Holmes
1304:Thank you,
1126:Will Beback
1101:Will Beback
1064:Will Beback
898:inter alia.
737:Please stop
681:__________
674:__________
592:days ago.
1285:Prem Rawat
945:talk pages
478:I created
287:Brahmanand
123:≈ jossi ≈
1289:mediation
957:Shift key
747:≈ jossi ≈
407:Thank you
147:reminder:
73:Explore,
62:Help Desk
40:test area
22:Knowledge
1380:operated
1344:declined
1295:and the
1008:Mael-Num
905:policy).
876:Vassyana
799:archive.
765:And yet
707:ongoing.
579:Mael-Num
527:Mael-Num
451:Mael-Num
414:Mael-Num
1382:by the
968:SineBot
712:deleted
487:Andries
464:Andries
352:Momento
299:Momento
18:Welcome
1541:Embram
1539:it. -
1518:Revera
1499:Embram
1475:Embram
1446:Revera
1320:Revera
1237:Revera
1202:Revera
1185:Revera
1143:Revera
1085:Revera
1030:Revera
983:Revera
953:tildes
925:Revera
909:Revera
853:Revera
751:(talk)
728:Revera
720:Revera
617:Revera
594:Revera
566:WP:BLP
553:Revera
497:Revera
441:Revera
428:Revera
396:Revera
339:Revera
239:revera
234:Revera
137:. . .
767:again
278:Kabir
1545:talk
1522:talk
1503:talk
1479:talk
1450:talk
1425:talk
1411:Tone
1402:talk
1338:The
1324:talk
1261:talk
1257:PatW
1241:talk
1221:talk
1217:PatW
1206:talk
1189:talk
1174:talk
1170:PatW
1147:talk
1131:talk
1120:HDSK
1106:talk
1089:talk
1069:talk
1055:HDSK
1034:talk
1012:talk
987:talk
972:talk
929:talk
913:talk
872:cool
782:this
547:and
459:See
58:help
49:and
1365:AGK
1308:AGK
20:to
1547:)
1524:)
1505:)
1492:.
1481:)
1452:)
1404:)
1396:--
1326:)
1263:)
1243:)
1223:)
1208:)
1191:)
1176:)
1149:)
1091:)
1036:)
1014:)
989:)
974:)
966:--
931:)
915:)
325:.
129:•
115:.
1543:(
1520:(
1501:(
1477:(
1448:(
1435:'
1400:(
1358:.
1322:(
1259:(
1239:(
1219:(
1204:(
1187:(
1172:(
1145:(
1087:(
1032:(
1010:(
985:(
970:(
927:(
911:(
703:.
131:@
127:t
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.