47:
repeatedly inserts criticism about education. They use sources that do not confirm the criticism. An
Administrator came by one article and reverted my revert due to a source being cited for the criticism, but I don’t think they checked the source! For
59:
According to wiki policy, “controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately”. I posted a note on
66:
Would you double check this to confirm I am not in the wrong in how I am interpreting wiki policy? Thank you.
71:
67:
60:
44:
31:
I wanted to involve a third party in a possible edit war over a few articles. The articles are
43:, which was recently deleted and had to be started over for copyright violation. User
63:
discussion page but they didn’t respond. They just keep re-inserting their edit.
53:
49:
40:
36:
32:
25:
21:
17:
56:’s own website which, of course, doesn’t reference any criticism of herself.
75:
8:
7:
14:
1:
76:00:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
91:
82:
90:
89:
85:
84:
83:
81:
80:
79:
29:
12:
11:
5:
88:
86:
28:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
87:
78:
77:
73:
69:
64:
62:
57:
55:
51:
46:
42:
38:
34:
27:
23:
19:
16:
65:
58:
50:Joyce Meyers
30:
68:Bwalker5435
54:Joyce Meyer
41:T. D. Jakes
37:Joyce Meyer
33:Paula White
26:T. D. Jakes
22:Paula White
18:Joyce Meyer
52:he uses
61:Cats77
45:Cats77
39:, and
72:talk
74:)
35:,
24:/
20:/
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.