839:
754:
669:
555:, but looking at the main SFU article, I think we really need to clean it up again. There's really no reason to list all the powers from one unsupported playtest module. As far as I'm concerned, one of the reasons for these articles is to try and bring together basic information that is often scattered in ADB materials. I'd love to find an article somewhere on the differences between canon Star Trek and current SFU,
2131:
1949:
2248:
2191:
397:
1722:
608:
321:
already. Maybe this isn't such a bad option though. And the third option is that we just drop it (at least for now). I don't know which one of these is the best, except that just dropping it will likely leave a bad taste in my mouth. (In any event, I'm also off on business for three weeks, so I probably won't be doing much editing. This whole experience, together with what's happened in the
250:
hear your ideas, and would welcome your changes to the list - not a problem! I've been a gamer since collge in the late 1970s, and now much more into miniature gaming. I merely wanted to differentiate the levels (similar to what we do in the ACW miniatures world to segregate company level games (Brother
Against Brother), regimental (Johnny Reb 3), brigade level (Fire & Fury) and strategic.
2029:
1508:; is this a subtlety of Knowledge or should there be a reference of this sort? In error, I referred to this elsewhere as table games which redirects to tabletop game (but tabletop gameS has no such redirect. My amendment was then removed which I thought harsh so can you advise how to ensure that a genuine errors of that sort is dealt with politely. How does one arrange a new redirect?
1817:
1418:
199:. ^_^ I'd also like to thank you for the edits to the end of the History section. Much better. I've been largely out of the wider wargaming community since '82, so anything you can do to extend the history past that point would be good. I might manage something off some of the magazines I've been buying off eBay, but that project could take me years to get around to. -_^ --
1539:, which in this context comes down to a combination of ground scale, unit scale (how many men per unit), and amount of time per turn. Even RPGs (uniformly one man per figure) can have different scales, for example, AD&D combat is measured in 10' squares and 10 seconds(?) per round, and GURPS uses 1 yard hexes and one-second turns. Miniatures and
2150:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1490:
am surprised that there is as yet no reference to this but rpg are not my favoured topic. I see these three groups of game as significantly different; they each have a large article about them and they are sold differently to different people; is this not a significant difference best described as a difference in scale? Please advise.
1196:(shrug) They've got enough moving parts that I don't know what is or isn't deemed necessary. It's pretty obvious that Beta is being let loose on anything that has a 'non-free' tag and doesn't have the requisite notice per page. So, I'm just adding those notices (which I'd already done, but hadn't talk-noted it). --
1489:
uses small figurines which can either be individuals such as generals or can be blocks of infantry etc. For many participants, the preparation of the pieces is as important as the actual battle. The role-playing game uses one-to-one figures where the player treats them, in effect, as avatars. And I
320:
article as it was there before; (2) This kind of thing could be handled by creating a new category, something like ] or something else that's appropriate and then applying this category to any article to which it's appropriate. Of course this only gets those companies that have articles on
Knowledge
249:
is considered a grand tactical game (the entire battle of
Gettysburg in regimental scale) while a smaller game such as Devil's Den would be more tactical (company level). Operational games are at the brigade level (Battle of Atlanta). Strategic games are campaign or operational in nature. I'd love to
2278:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
1529:
First off, no one "owns" Knowledge pages. As you might imagine though, I do keep eye on pages I have an interest in. I generally try keep something of anything I come across, but was too confused as to your point to be able to do so in that case. Sorry. :( By the way, if you get a free user account,
1062:
thanks for your help. I'll see your "bleh", and raise you a blech. I agree with you entirely. this is just seeming silly. Knowledge is making it harder for its own editors (and by the way rewarding people like us for treating this like a blank exercise, and penalizing those who take things like this
299:
Heh. I have to thank
Answers.com and Barron's on that one. I knew more-or-less what a house organ was, but was having a hard time writing anything better than an 'ehh' wiktionary definition until I saw the 'internal vs. external' bit that I hadn't really thought about before. So, I learned something
260:
Rindis - thanks for fixing the formatting on the
Operation Kadesh link. I'm new to Knowledge and am largely clueless about formatting. Anyway, I'm interested in the Arab-Israeli conflict, and figured that I'd slowly fill out the game descriptions if no one else is going to. I'll add a description
562:
I noted you mentioning an SFU-Wiki. I've had the same thought for a while. It could be a great way to untangle a lot of half-buried info. However, I think it'd come up against some really nasty copyright and licensing issues fast, so I'm not sure that it's doable at a level that would make it truly
208:
I know what you mean. How stupid were we 20 years ago (if you were out of diapers, I mean) :-) not to buy this stuff when we had the chance. I am now buying up WARGAMER, FIRE AND MOVEMENT etc. on ebay also - I find the anniversary editions provide great references on the "history of wargaming" and
576:
I kinda agree that we need to be willing to let go of some of the SFU stuff, like the
Xorkeans (who have barely been mentioned anyway by the game itself) and maybe let go of the playtest stuff. The whole issue has hit the Village Pump/Policy page in a discussion of what constitutes notability and
420:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient
586:
As for the SFU-wiki, I have proposed that directly on the
Federation Commander forum as something that would be directly under the umbrella of SFGs, partly to give access to all SFU copywrited material, and partly to let the Steves be able to go in and make thier view of what can and can't be
1572:
mention
Eurogames/German-style games already (second entry in Categories). "Civilization"/4X games are not a generally recognized category of board games however. (The concept does come up in BGG conversations once in while, but it'll be eventually challenged/thrown out without a
352:
Hmm, a photo of a collection of some 'conventional' units might be good. Whether to make that a third, or replace the Fencer photo is another question. Personally, in preference to any of that, I think some photos of the components from the boardgame editions would be good. ^_^
1623:
As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next
Knowledge DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the
1511:
It is clear from the comments on your talk page that you are the author of this and similar pages so presumably it is improper? rude? unauthorised? to make changes without your agreement. On that basis, I will of course desist from doing any work in this area. Please advise.
547:
results, which I'm generally fine with. He's also not just picking on SFU (I wondered if he noticed us through PD while going around the GURPS stuff.) So, I think we're going to weather it fairly well. I'll join in on the discussion if I can think of something intelligent to
315:
Well, as you might have noticed the deletion review has been closed with no further comments from anyone that would really explain why, or answer our questions that we had. At this time I see two (or really three) options... (1) The information could be reinserted into the
265:
No problem. I've slowly learned (and re-learned) all the tricks over a period of time. I still have a lot of things that I want to get in there, and then a heck of a lot of red-links to do something about... ^_^ Pity I don't get paid for this, it'd be great job security!
341:
Hi Rindis, thanks for the correction on the Ogre article; I realised my mistake as soon as I saw a photo of the Mk IV but you beat me to it. In your opinion, could the article do with one more photo to illustrate the smaller units, or are the existing two photos enough?
990:
941:, I believe, is to speed up the process where everyone agrees it's a bad idea. One person objecting will halt it. Looks like this happened here, and then it got AFD'd to death. (sigh) Part of a chain of events that put me off Wiki for a while. (Of course, I have
101:
I have no objections to you moving the article, or moving the purely SFC related info. It's just my knowledge regarding SFB only really stretches as far as what I know from the 1st SFC game and reading a few articles on this site. Thanks for the heads up. cya
2215:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1281:
652:
I know what you mean, I refused to use the current 'ref' system for a long while, and only recently converted one of my bigger articles to it. Anyway, I'm always happy to clean up the obvious stuff. The obsessive detail-oriented streak in me is happy.
209:
WARGAMER especially published great anthologies on individual topics (ie history of naval wargames, history of Civil War wargames, etc.) Unfortunately my library is only up to the mid-to-late 80s, as reflected in my wikipedia edits!
2219:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1241:
I am the publisher and freely give myself the right to use the cover of the magazine, which I write, produce, edit, and publish. I think this more than qualifies for FAIR USE. It's my own copyright and creation.
2089:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1651:. If there is anything you can do to help it get passed, please join in! Also, feel free to comment on the D&D WikiProject talk page regarding our efforts to get articles in the 0.7 release.
1551:, having a different point and focus than wargames. They are also not board games (being an entirely separate high-level division). The relationship between the three is gone into a little in the
1591:
has been a subject of some dispute. Mostly in that no one is happy with the name, and I think the article is technically a bit more recent. Certainly, no one has been paying much attention to it.
382:
I won't revert your edit for now, but please explain your position in more detail on the article talk page. I don't understand the basis on which you judge the game to be an abstract. Thanks. -
2056:
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --
64:! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the
1501:
groups which do not get a reference in this section and may deserve a mention. If you are making changes then perhaps a brief paragraph differentiating these would benefit other readers.
1156:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
1032:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
623:
1826:. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Knowledge.
222:), but went out of business just as I was really reaching the point of being able to intelligently observe some of what was going on. Sounds like I need to pay more attention to
2275:
1477:
As regards SCALE, it is "evident" that there is both a physical difference in the playing-pieces and the depth of involvement of the players at each level. The (hex-grid)
1001:
during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
461:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
424:
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
1625:
1436:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
1315:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
1284:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
1222:
when you have a chance, some people have added some tags. also, who else do you know has edited this article favorably, and is currently an active editor? thanks. --
2212:
1978:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at
1699:
876:
1312:
1433:
2282:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
1462:
Please explain why you believe it is correct to remove an additional description of wargames which points the reader to three significant articles on board
2050:
1691:
1671:
Thanks for the shift to nested format here. I tried doing the same thing this morning, but it didn't work for me. I see what I did wrong, though <g: -->
1597:
2042:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the
1148:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
1024:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
895:
to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add
810:
to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add
725:
to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add
1777:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
879:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
794:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
709:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
2264:
2202:
998:
978:
970:
964:
906:
852:
474:
2162:
1782:
1160:
1153:
1036:
1029:
884:
799:
714:
470:
44:
529:
has it in for just about any sub-article, including any centered on the SFU. Shall we resign ourselves are push hard to keep what we have? --
1698:. Since you had endorsed at least one summary in the prior Request for Comment, I thought that you would want to know. You can see the RFC/U
2114:
1842:
1515:
1273:
1152:
carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
1028:
carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
1848:
I don't know if you've been around in a while, but I'd like to point out to you the success we've had with the D&D GA-drive so far:
1164:
1040:
490:
25:
to Knowledge. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
1257:
421:
information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
151:
already has. I'll leave you a note directly, but at the moment Wiki is barfing on your talk page (but not the main user page), so....
1747:
860:
775:
690:
1159:
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
1035:
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
2110:
2039:
1885:
1786:
1751:
982:
974:
888:
864:
803:
779:
718:
694:
2260:
1873:
455:
451:
137:
156:
Also, if you read this before I get a chance to leave a message, It would be nice if you could tighten up my editor info on
1881:
445:
368:
1905:
1063:
seriously, since in the end the only way to handle this is through the use of ordinary boilerplate). oh well. thanks. --
49:
29:
22:
2101:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
2283:
2146:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2106:
1994:
1729:
856:
771:
686:
2151:
1771:
1149:
1025:
439:
322:
39:
2268:
2206:
2043:
1998:
1964:
1755:
1429:
1308:
1277:
986:
868:
783:
698:
619:
133:
54:
1519:
1494:
1172:
1048:
396:
364:
112:
1736:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
1087:
text about it anywhere (including samples of what to do). The current versions are obtuse and overwrought. --
989:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
1971:
1358:
1339:
1020:
615:
601:
363:
Good edit on the Ogre page--You left in the game balance issues of 1st edition while mentioning the changes.
1144:
2142:
1979:
1798:
1432:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
1311:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
1280:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
1253:
412:
69:
1677:
1543:
can have much more variation in scale. The differences between miniatures and board wargames are ones of
1911:
If you're interested in coming around to check out what we've been up to, you are welcome as always. :)
1733:
1600:
is a good place to find more people than just me interested in the various articles we're discussing. --
1386:
61:
1963:
on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a
1559:
article. It's possible more needs to be said in the overview, which, frankly, still needs some cleanup.
1478:
1320:
1289:
981:
satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "
559:
we can get it here without violating OR, and it's the type of information that Knowledge really needs.
2009:
1877:
1853:
1828:
Article Rescue Members are not necessarily inclusionists, all wikipedians are warmly welcome to join.
1245:
1219:
1002:
910:
825:
740:
246:
126:
2004:
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
640:
I get impatient with the multiple forms of footnoting/referencing used here. Thanks for the help. --
196:
2293:
2255:
2239:
2102:
1975:
1960:
1889:
1790:
1763:
1648:
1556:
1168:
1044:
892:
807:
722:
622:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
317:
284:
210:
182:
1822:
Hello, Rindis. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the
1770:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
1316:
1285:
875:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
790:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
705:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
587:
webified (i.e. what will and won't detract from people buying thier products) as they see fit. --
2060:
1897:
1857:
1695:
1471:
1467:
1335:
899:
814:
791:
729:
627:
526:
478:
428:
34:
838:
753:
668:
539:
Haven't been paying too much attention lately, but I'm noticing that it's mostly going towards
2228:
2078:
2069:
1794:
1486:
1249:
706:
251:
2098:
2082:
1935:
1865:
1861:
1382:
1227:
1187:
1122:
1068:
928:
496:
383:
343:
2097:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
991:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe) (2nd nomination)
2197:
2181:
2170:
2005:
1869:
937:
Looks like it was PRODed, which can lead to deletion of an article if no one objects. The
641:
326:
158:
122:
85:
73:
1361:
regarding him as an alternative to mediation, and would like your opinion on the matter.
859:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
774:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
689:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
416:. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
2288:
2094:
2086:
1986:
1931:
1816:
1778:
1673:
1448:
880:
795:
710:
588:
530:
501:
406:
219:
65:
1282:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Klingon Empire (Star Fleet Universe) (2nd nomination)
2090:
2057:
1990:
1916:
1823:
1707:
1656:
1633:
1588:
1540:
1505:
1439:
1366:
1347:
1304:
994:
847:
821:
767:
762:
677:
484:
1721:
607:
2224:
2147:
2053:
until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1901:
1504:
Finally I note that the lower categories do not mention that the 'top' category is
1425:
736:
682:
2028:
1948:
1530:
you can also 'watch' pages, and see a list of when they've been modified recently.
118:
I just wanted to congratulate and thank you for your superb work on that article.
467:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
2035:
2020:
1893:
1746:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
1601:
1575:
1398:
1223:
1197:
1183:
1118:
1088:
1078:
The true measure of Knowledge's success is that the bureaucracy is moving in....
1064:
946:
924:
654:
564:
511:
354:
335:
301:
277:
267:
227:
200:
163:
148:
1993:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see
1417:
2166:
1849:
1741:
Appearently non-notable game, if there are third party sources please include.
1644:
1565:
1396:
Thanks. And to think it only took me a year and half to piece together. : -->
261:
for Fast Attack Boats at some point in the next couple of weeks. --Bookshelf
1974:
to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only
218:
Born in '70. My dad was in the industry (I'm doing my best to stay away from
1552:
1444:
417:
103:
1103:
it might let people know the rule is meaningless and depends only on jargon
977:. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that
1912:
1703:
1652:
1629:
1463:
1362:
1343:
178:
1482:
1111:
people might forget the ancient art of filling out forms on Knowledge
1930:
Yeah but there is section in the Strategy game article on Wargames.
1338:' Request for Comment, so I am alerting you that we are preparing a
181:
list. A big improvement over the laundry list that was there before.
2297:
2232:
2174:
2118:
2063:
2013:
1938:
1920:
1802:
1711:
1680:
1660:
1637:
1609:
1523:
1452:
1406:
1390:
1370:
1351:
1324:
1293:
1261:
1231:
1205:
1191:
1176:
1126:
1096:
1072:
1052:
1005:
954:
932:
913:
828:
743:
657:
646:
630:
591:
567:
533:
514:
504:
386:
372:
357:
346:
329:
304:
293:
270:
254:
230:
213:
203:
185:
166:
141:
106:
1536:
147:
Thanks! I figured it needs to get the same sort of attention that
2085:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
1985:
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
495:
If you believe you received this message in error, please notify
325:
small edit-warring has really been souring my enthusiasm here.)
435:
997:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
1547:
rather than strictly by scale. RPGs are generally a separate
1083:
I wouldn't mind the this particular rule as much if they had
2129:
1947:
1781:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
1720:
1416:
923:
now automatically?! Am ir eading this correctly?! thanks. --
883:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
837:
798:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
752:
713:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
667:
606:
395:
2038:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be
1997:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found
1498:
1182:
I tried to fix this. let me know what you think. thanks. --
1107:
it might detract from the sublime purity of this whole idea
1758:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
871:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
786:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
701:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
177:
Thanks for the good edits and formatting of the "notable"
125:
article. You may be interested in the note I just left on
1750:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
1535:
I think you have mis-apprehensions as to the meaning of
863:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
778:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
693:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
2253:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
2195:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1014:
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Universe logo.jpg
624:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Star Fleet Battle Force
462:
121:
Also, I see from your user page that you've edited the
89:
77:
2263:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
2161:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
1268:
AfD nomination of Klingon Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
1138:
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CommanderSFB.gif
458:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
1970:
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
1841:
Just wanted to say Hi, after having passed my recent
162:, your collection is much more complete than mine. --
2201:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
1474:. Each of these sections is significant of itself.
2276:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Star Fleet Universe
1808:
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
1163:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
1039:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
614:An article that you have been involved in editing,
489:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
2077:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
2034:A discussion has begun about whether the article
973:, an article you created, has been nominated for
855:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
770:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
685:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
438:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at
1357:I am alerting you that we are now considering a
35:Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
2213:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Napoleon (game)
392:Image source problem with Image:Avalon Hill.jpg
2157:Note that any non-free images not used in any
72:or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --
1313:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Orion Pirates
8:
2124:Orphaned non-free image File:Avalon Hill.jpg
1434:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Omega Octant
2051:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/House organ
1643:I see that you have put some work into the
311:List of miniature and terrain manufacturers
1955:Hello. Your account has been granted the "
1717:Proposed deletion of Federation and Empire
84:No problem, all part of the service... --
60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1667:Talk:John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster
1485:uses 1cm cards to identify forces. The
999:Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
979:Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
971:Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
965:Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
907:Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
853:Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
834:Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
577:original research for fictional entities.
300:new and passed it on to Knowledge. ^_^ --
551:I'm not exactly happy with the Merge on
434:tag can be used to release it under the
1732:template has been added to the article
1596:Thanks for the note, and be aware that
851:template has been added to the article
766:template has been added to the article
681:template has been added to the article
452:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use
1647:article, which I have nominated for a
1154:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
1030:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
919:what the hell?!?!?!?! who is deleting
473:. If the image is copyrighted under a
7:
1934:. So that's why I went with that. --
1274:Klingon Empire (Star Fleet Universe)
487:after 10:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
405:This is an automated message from a
2265:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
2203:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
1692:request for comment on user conduct
450:or one of the other tags listed at
2274:The discussion will take place at
1694:has recently been filed regarding
1616:D&D articles for Knowledge 0.7
1579:article talking about the concept.
14:
2211:The article will be discussed at
2103:review the candidates' statements
2049:The article will be discussed at
1967:scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
1598:WikiProject Board and table games
2246:
2189:
2027:
1815:
1811:
1886:Expedition to the Barrier Peaks
1299:AfD nomination of Orion Pirates
245:Hello! A game like the classic
2109:. For the Election committee,
2079:Arbitration Committee election
2070:ArbCom elections are now open!
1874:Dwellers of the Forbidden City
1681:17:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
1638:05:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
1428:, an article you created, for
1413:AfD nomination of Omega Octant
1381:Awesome article. Good work! -
1307:, an article you created, for
1276:, an article you created, for
1165:media copyright questions page
1041:media copyright questions page
658:18:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
647:16:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
631:09:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
592:16:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
568:16:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
534:02:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
521:Defending the SFU on Knowledge
515:15:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
505:10:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
491:Media copyright questions page
456:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
305:21:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
294:21:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
271:22:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
255:21:57, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
2152:our policy for non-free media
2119:22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
1959:" userright, allowing you to
1939:02:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
1906:Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)
1882:The Lost Caverns of Tsojcanth
1789:, where it may be deleted if
1626:WikiProject D&D talk page
1262:18:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
1232:15:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
1206:22:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1192:22:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1177:20:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1127:04:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1101:Ah, but if they do that then
1097:21:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1073:20:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1053:02:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
955:22:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
933:20:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
891:, where it may be deleted if
806:, where it may be deleted if
721:, where it may be deleted if
410:. You have recently uploaded
2175:17:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
2163:criteria for speedy deletion
1803:20:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
1712:00:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
1334:Hello - you participated in
1161:criteria for speedy deletion
1037:criteria for speedy deletion
1006:21:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
914:20:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
829:20:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
744:19:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
471:criteria for speedy deletion
191:Heh, just got done thanking
45:How to write a great article
2105:and submit your choices on
2064:15:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
1995:Knowledge:Reviewing process
1756:Knowledge's deletion policy
1661:03:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
1610:18:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
1524:07:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
1493:In addition, there are the
869:Knowledge's deletion policy
784:Knowledge's deletion policy
699:Knowledge's deletion policy
231:20:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
214:20:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
204:20:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
186:20:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
2313:
2233:07:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
2111:MediaWiki message delivery
1976:a small number of articles
1921:17:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
1845:. How's everything going?
1821:
1371:13:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
1352:03:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
1150:Knowledge:Non-free content
1109:err scratch that, I meant
1026:Knowledge:Non-free content
483:the image will be deleted
440:Knowledge:Non-free content
323:List of miniature wargames
107:11:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
80:] 00:07, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2261:significantly contributed
2130:
2014:18:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
1961:review other users' edits
1779:proposed deletion process
1442:of receiving this notice?
1407:22:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
1391:19:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
1325:20:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
1294:20:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
1237:Image for Charge Magazine
987:Knowledge deletion policy
881:proposed deletion process
796:proposed deletion process
711:proposed deletion process
387:17:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
378:Acquire, abstract or not?
373:20:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
358:15:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
347:07:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
283:Nice job on this as well!
92:] 00:20, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2205:or whether it should be
1980:Special:OldReviewedPages
1783:speedy deletion criteria
1605:
1495:german-style board games
1453:21:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
1402:
1201:
1092:
950:
885:speedy deletion criteria
800:speedy deletion criteria
715:speedy deletion criteria
636:Thanks for footnote help
330:21:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
167:16:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
142:14:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
113:Simulations Publications
68:, add a question to the
2298:01:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
1824:Article Rescue Squadron
1359:Request for Arbitration
1021:Image:Universe logo.jpg
616:Star Fleet Battle Force
602:Star Fleet Battle Force
400:Image Copyright problem
2284:the configuration page
2135:
1952:
1944:You are now a Reviewer
1793:to delete is reached.
1748:criteria for inclusion
1725:
1479:Strategy & Tactics
1421:
1330:Request for Mediation?
1218:please take a look at
1145:Image:CommanderSFB.gif
993:and please be sure to
861:criteria for inclusion
842:
776:criteria for inclusion
757:
691:criteria for inclusion
672:
618:, has been listed for
611:
401:
241:List of board wargames
2140:Thanks for uploading
2133:
2083:Arbitration Committee
1951:
1900:, and we plan to hit
1843:Request for adminship
1787:Articles for Deletion
1785:or it can be sent to
1752:What Knowledge is not
1734:Federation and Empire
1724:
1628:for more details. :)
1497:and the Civilization
1458:board game categories
1420:
1340:Request for Mediation
1142:Thanks for uploading
1058:thanks for image help
1018:Thanks for uploading
983:What Knowledge is not
945:as it is anyway.). --
889:Articles for Deletion
887:or it can be sent to
865:What Knowledge is not
841:
804:Articles for Deletion
802:or it can be sent to
780:What Knowledge is not
756:
719:Articles for Deletion
717:or it can be sent to
695:What Knowledge is not
671:
610:
413:Image:Avalon Hill.jpg
399:
97:Regarding my Hydrans.
2259:, to which you have
2143:File:Avalon Hill.jpg
1908:after some work. :)
1878:White Plume Mountain
1854:Wizards of the Coast
1553:history of wargaming
1220:Federation Commander
446:non-free fair use in
442:, use a tag such as
247:Terrible Swift Sword
127:Talk:The Space Gamer
2267:or if it should be
2256:Star Fleet Universe
2240:Star Fleet Universe
2087:arbitration process
1890:Planescape: Torment
1686:Gavin.collins RFC/U
1557:miniature wargaming
365:Gilbertine goldmark
318:Miniature wargaming
2136:
2099:arbitration policy
1953:
1898:Against the Giants
1858:Dragons of Despair
1726:
1472:role-playing games
1468:miniature wargames
1422:
995:sign your comments
963:AfD nomination of
843:
758:
673:
612:
600:AfD nomination of
479:Knowledge:Fair use
469:, as described on
402:
50:Naming conventions
30:How to edit a page
2148:claim of fair use
1834:
1833:
1829:
1730:proposed deletion
1487:miniature wargame
1443:
1424:I have nominated
1303:I have nominated
1272:I have nominated
1264:
1248:comment added by
857:proposed deletion
848:proposed deletion
772:proposed deletion
763:proposed deletion
687:proposed deletion
678:proposed deletion
589:Donovan Ravenhull
531:Donovan Ravenhull
140:
2304:
2250:
2249:
2193:
2192:
2138:
2132:
2031:
1958:
1936:User:Woohookitty
1866:Forgotten Realms
1827:
1819:
1812:
1769:
1768:
1762:
1437:
1243:
943:too many hobbies
904:
898:
874:
819:
813:
789:
734:
728:
704:
644:
475:non-free license
449:
433:
427:
291:
136:
40:Picture tutorial
2312:
2311:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2286:. Delivered by
2251:
2247:
2244:
2222:
2198:Napoleon (game)
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:Napoleon (game)
2165:. Thank you. --
2127:
2126:
2107:the voting page
2073:
2044:deletion policy
2032:
2025:
1965:two-month trial
1956:
1946:
1928:
1870:Tomb of Horrors
1862:Drizzt Do'Urden
1839:
1810:
1766:
1760:
1759:
1719:
1688:
1669:
1618:
1460:
1438:Do you want to
1415:
1379:
1342:regarding him.
1332:
1301:
1270:
1239:
1216:
1214:need assistance
1140:
1060:
1016:
1003:Judgesurreal777
968:
911:Judgesurreal777
902:
896:
872:
836:
826:Judgesurreal777
817:
811:
787:
751:
741:Judgesurreal777
732:
726:
702:
666:
642:
638:
605:
553:Minor Powers...
523:
497:the bot's owner
448:|article name}}
443:
431:
425:
394:
380:
339:
313:
285:
281:
243:
175:
159:The Space Gamer
123:The Space Gamer
116:
99:
55:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
2310:
2308:
2245:
2243:
2238:Nomination of
2236:
2188:
2187:
2185:
2180:Nomination of
2178:
2125:
2122:
2076:
2072:
2067:
2026:
2024:
2019:Nomination of
2017:
1991:BLP violations
1945:
1942:
1927:
1924:
1838:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1820:
1809:
1806:
1744:
1743:
1718:
1715:
1687:
1684:
1668:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1620:Hi there! :)
1617:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1593:
1592:
1589:tabletop games
1581:
1580:
1561:
1560:
1555:, more in the
1541:board wargames
1532:
1531:
1516:81.156.248.136
1506:tabletop games
1459:
1456:
1414:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1378:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1331:
1328:
1300:
1297:
1269:
1266:
1238:
1235:
1215:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1169:BetacommandBot
1139:
1136:
1134:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1080:
1079:
1059:
1056:
1045:BetacommandBot
1015:
1012:
1010:
967:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
905:to the top of
873:{{dated prod}}
835:
832:
820:to the top of
788:{{dated prod}}
750:
747:
735:to the top of
703:{{dated prod}}
665:
662:
661:
660:
637:
634:
626:. Thank you.
604:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
581:
580:
579:
578:
571:
570:
563:worthwhile. --
560:
549:
522:
519:
518:
517:
393:
390:
379:
376:
361:
360:
338:
333:
312:
309:
308:
307:
288:Michael Dorosh
280:
275:
274:
273:
258:
242:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
211:Michael Dorosh
197:Talk:Wargaming
183:Michael Dorosh
174:
171:
170:
169:
153:
152:
115:
110:
98:
95:
94:
93:
58:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
32:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2309:
2300:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2290:
2285:
2280:
2279:the article.
2277:
2272:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2257:
2241:
2237:
2235:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2221:
2217:
2214:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2183:
2179:
2177:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2155:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2144:
2137:
2123:
2121:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2071:
2068:
2066:
2065:
2062:
2059:
2054:
2052:
2047:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2030:
2022:
2018:
2016:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2002:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1983:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1972:autoconfirmed
1968:
1966:
1962:
1950:
1943:
1941:
1940:
1937:
1933:
1925:
1923:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1909:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1846:
1844:
1836:
1825:
1818:
1814:
1813:
1807:
1805:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1775:
1773:
1772:its talk page
1765:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1742:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1735:
1731:
1723:
1716:
1714:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1702:. Thank you.
1701:
1697:
1696:Gavin.collins
1693:
1685:
1683:
1682:
1679:
1675:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1621:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1507:
1502:
1500:
1496:
1491:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1475:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1457:
1455:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1441:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1419:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1377:Board wargame
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1336:Gavin.collins
1329:
1327:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1305:Orion Pirates
1298:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1267:
1265:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1236:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1224:Steve, Sm8900
1221:
1213:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1184:Steve, Sm8900
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1157:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1137:
1135:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1119:Steve, Sm8900
1116:
1112:
1108:
1105:errr, I mean
1104:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:Steve, Sm8900
1057:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1007:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
966:
962:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
935:
934:
930:
926:
925:Steve, Sm8900
922:
918:
917:
916:
915:
912:
908:
901:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
877:its talk page
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
849:
840:
833:
831:
830:
827:
823:
822:Orion Pirates
816:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
792:its talk page
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
768:Orion Pirates
765:
764:
755:
749:Orion Pirates
748:
746:
745:
742:
738:
731:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
707:its talk page
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
679:
670:
663:
659:
656:
651:
650:
649:
648:
645:
635:
633:
632:
629:
628:Gavin Collins
625:
621:
617:
609:
603:
599:
593:
590:
585:
584:
583:
582:
575:
574:
573:
572:
569:
566:
561:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:
536:
535:
532:
528:
527:Gavin.collins
520:
516:
513:
509:
508:
507:
506:
503:
500:
498:
492:
488:
486:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
459:
457:
453:
447:
441:
437:
430:
422:
419:
415:
414:
409:
408:
398:
391:
389:
388:
385:
377:
375:
374:
370:
366:
359:
356:
351:
350:
349:
348:
345:
337:
334:
332:
331:
328:
324:
319:
310:
306:
303:
298:
297:
296:
295:
292:
290:
289:
279:
276:
272:
269:
264:
263:
262:
257:
256:
253:
248:
240:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
212:
207:
206:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
189:
188:
187:
184:
180:
172:
168:
165:
161:
160:
155:
154:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
139:
135:
130:
128:
124:
119:
114:
111:
109:
108:
105:
96:
91:
87:
83:
82:
81:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
19:
18:
2287:
2281:
2273:
2254:
2252:
2242:for deletion
2223:
2218:
2210:
2196:
2184:for deletion
2158:
2156:
2141:
2139:
2128:
2074:
2055:
2048:
2033:
2023:for deletion
2003:
1984:
1969:
1954:
1929:
1910:
1902:Dave Arneson
1847:
1840:
1795:Rocksanddirt
1776:
1745:
1740:
1727:
1689:
1670:
1622:
1619:
1585:
1574:
1569:
1548:
1544:
1514:
1510:
1503:
1492:
1481:-type board
1476:
1461:
1426:Omega Octant
1423:
1380:
1333:
1302:
1271:
1250:Scott Mingus
1240:
1217:
1167:. Thank you.
1158:
1143:
1141:
1133:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1084:
1061:
1043:. Thank you.
1034:
1019:
1017:
1009:
969:
942:
938:
920:
846:
844:
761:
759:
737:Omega Octant
683:Omega Octant
676:
674:
664:Omega Octant
639:
613:
556:
552:
544:
540:
524:
494:
482:
466:
460:
423:
411:
404:
403:
381:
362:
340:
314:
287:
286:
282:
259:
252:Scott Mingus
244:
224:The Wargamer
223:
192:
176:
157:
131:
120:
117:
100:
70:village pump
59:
20:
16:
15:
2036:House organ
2021:House organ
1894:Dragonlance
1383:Chunky Rice
1244:—Preceding
643:Orange Mike
525:Looks like
510:Updated. --
384:Chunky Rice
344:Marasmusine
336:Ogre (game)
278:House organ
149:Avalon Hill
21:Hello, and
2095:topic bans
2006:Courcelles
1850:Gary Gygax
1764:dated prod
1645:Gary Gygax
1566:board game
985:" and the
327:Craw-daddy
86:Francs2000
74:Francs2000
66:help pages
62:Wikipedian
2289:SDZeroBot
2091:site bans
1987:vandalism
1791:consensus
1690:Hello. A
1674:BPMullins
1649:GA review
1115:forget it
1113:oh, just
900:db-author
893:consensus
815:db-author
808:consensus
730:db-author
723:consensus
502:OsamaKBOT
463:this link
429:GFDL-self
418:copyright
2159:articles
2058:RoySmith
1957:reviewer
1926:Strategy
1576:reliable
1568:article
1464:wargames
1430:deletion
1397:.< --
1309:deletion
1278:deletion
1258:contribs
1246:unsigned
1117:. :-) --
975:deletion
921:articles
620:deletion
485:48 hours
179:wargames
173:wargames
132:Cheers,
17:Welcome!
2269:deleted
2225:SunDawn
2207:deleted
2040:deleted
1483:wargame
1440:opt out
1317:Jobjörn
1286:Jobjörn
1085:helpful
548:say. ;)
481:) then
220:WP:AUTO
102:around-
23:welcome
2081:. The
2061:(talk)
1896:, and
1754:" and
1602:Rindis
1399:Rindis
1198:Rindis
1089:Rindis
947:Rindis
939:theory
867:" and
782:" and
697:" and
655:Rindis
565:Rindis
512:Rindis
454:. See
355:Rindis
302:Rindis
268:Rindis
228:Rindis
201:Rindis
164:Rindis
138:(talk)
2167:B-bot
1837:Hello
1830:~~~~
1586:think
1549:genre
1537:scale
541:Merge
477:(per
407:robot
2294:talk
2229:talk
2171:talk
2115:talk
2010:talk
1999:here
1932:Here
1917:talk
1904:and
1799:talk
1708:talk
1700:here
1678:Talk
1657:talk
1634:talk
1606:talk
1570:does
1564:The
1545:form
1520:talk
1470:and
1449:talk
1445:Plrk
1403:talk
1387:talk
1367:talk
1348:talk
1321:talk
1290:talk
1254:talk
1228:talk
1202:talk
1188:talk
1173:talk
1123:talk
1093:talk
1069:talk
1049:talk
951:talk
929:talk
557:then
545:Keep
543:and
436:GFDL
369:talk
226:. --
104:Ktan
90:Talk
78:Talk
2154:).
2075:Hi,
1989:or
1913:BOZ
1704:BOZ
1672:--
1653:BOZ
1630:BOZ
1466:,
1363:BOZ
1344:BOZ
909:.
824:.
739:.
195:on
193:you
134:CWC
2296:)
2271:.
2231:)
2209:.
2173:)
2117:)
2093:,
2046:.
2012:)
2001:.
1982:.
1919:)
1892:,
1888:,
1884:,
1880:,
1876:,
1872:,
1868:,
1864:,
1860:,
1856:,
1852:,
1801:)
1774:.
1767:}}
1761:{{
1728:A
1710:)
1676:|
1659:)
1636:)
1608:)
1584:I
1522:)
1499:4X
1451:)
1405:)
1389:)
1369:)
1350:)
1323:)
1292:)
1260:)
1256:•
1230:)
1204:)
1190:)
1175:)
1125:)
1095:)
1071:)
1051:)
953:)
931:)
903:}}
897:{{
845:A
818:}}
812:{{
760:A
733:}}
727:{{
675:A
653:--
493:.
465:.
444:{{
432:}}
426:{{
371:)
353:--
266:--
129:.
88:|
76:|
2292:(
2227:(
2169:(
2134:⚠
2113:(
2008:(
1915:(
1797:(
1706:(
1655:(
1632:(
1604:(
1518:(
1447:(
1401:(
1385:(
1365:(
1346:(
1319:(
1288:(
1252:(
1226:(
1200:(
1186:(
1171:(
1121:(
1091:(
1067:(
1047:(
949:(
927:(
499:.
367:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.