Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 3 (End Feb 2007)

Source 📝

103:
Times. I agree the comparison is NOR. When such big controversy such as the NKF controversy or this occurs, it is usually the rule for the person in charge to resign (to save face and admit wrongdoing), but he didn't. Personally, I think that it must be because of his links to PM Lee and MM Lee. (Similar to Mrs Goh Chok Tong, remember her support for Durai? Nothing happened to her, she also didn't apologise. SM Goh had to cover up for her.) I should also enlighten you that Singapore's press is tightly controlled by the government (of which Philip Yeo is part of). --
520:, SMILES contain in some exotic cases a ], which closes the URL where the parameter is imbedded in (the parser does not know whether it was in a template at that point anymore, and things become ugly. It can be solved partially, by putting a 'urlencode' around the parameter in the URL, but that does not work for what the template is displaying (yes, it works, but then noone will understand what is displayed). The same apparently goes for the DOI-template, which I cannot repair (template is locked). Hope this explains .. now to find a solution .. -- 904:. Do take a look. I've explained the syntax, so that it is now possible to give the name of the particular act on top of the chapter number. Should the title of the act take precedence? Right now, the title is an optional parameter, and is given in parantheses. No problems with the non-numbered statutes. A "hard" link (a copy-paste link, instead of a template-number link) can be used. 1053:. It makes no mention of mathml, though it on the pages on my watchlist, mathml changes are usually reverted because its use is very jarring compared with the existing text. Specifically, the type faces are different from the text, and the font sizes are often larger when there are superscripts. If the use of superscripts and subscripts can do the job, why complicate matters? -- 958:, the citation is to the same work but to a different part of the work. For instance, it could be a reference to a different page of the same book, or a different section of the same Act of Parliament. Even though electronic resources are searchable, don't you think it would be helpful to provide a more precise reference? For instance, in ' 304: 962:', there are references to individual sections of the Penal Code. In my view it doesn't make much sense to condense all these references into a single footnote referencing the Penal Code on-line, otherwise users will have to browse through more than 500 sections of the Code to locate a particular section. 875:
Statutes that have chapter numbers are cited like this: "Application of English Law Act (Cap. 7A, 1994 Rev. Ed.)". However, not all statutes are assigned chapter numbers. Some statutes only get chapter numbers after a number of amendments have been made and it is decided to publish a revised edition,
861:
Hi Jack. It's my pleasure, w.r.t. cleanup. There wasn't a template for Singapore statutes prior. I just created it today in response to your article. I'll use the template for those, not a problem. Is the presentation of the reference correct? I'm not a laywer so I'm not sure of your citation styles.
785:
I did what any teacher does when stuck with software - I asked one of my students, who showed me in 10 minutes how to solve the problem with Excel. Look for some more professional-looking graphs soon! You have to do "Chart - Source Data" then select each cell individually rather than just selecting
601:
You don't have to go into the esoterics, just copy and paste :-). I think the P.S. is a good plan, though I do like the idea of getting external input, I know we might be 'blind' to our own writing sometimes, I know that I did not see mistakes anymore when I wrote my thesis, it all made sense to me.
355:
Rifleman, with all due respect, I guess we will just have to agree to disagree about using an image with German wording. Really, it should'nt take more than a few minutes for the original uploader of that image into Commons to translate it into English and and to produce an English version. Why not
102:
Come on Rifleman, if you're a Singaporean, you should know that Philip Yeo's comments caused more public anger than September 11, at least in Singapore. But the matter was allowed to go away quietly without even an apology; Philip Yeo claimed he was misquoted, which was a claim refuted by the Straits
495:
The image is a wonderful image, however if we agree that ALS is equivalent to ammonium dodecyl sulfate, the tail of the molecule should have 12 carbons. The image displays a molecule that has only 10. This is my only concern with the image, I believe I have modified it to have 12 carbons, however I
1117:
The Martini reference actually is not a web resource, thus cite web may not be the best. It is actually a paper from a journal, Vesalius (never heard of it myself), and is not published by pubmed though they index it. Also, maybe you can consider using PMIDs instead of dumping the entire link from
936:
The usual way of referencing an Act of Parliament is to put the title of the Act first. We don't usually put the words "Singapore Statutes" in front. Perhaps you can tweak the template again so that it automatically provides the name of the Act in front, like this: "Application of English Law Act,
248:
in the wikipedia to organic-chemistry.org. The way I have seen these links added is in general spammy .. only addition of the link, seems promotional to me. But then, if www.orgsyn.org is OK, the other should also be mentioned. Or both should go. I do concur with the point of view, cut down on
207:
though. That is, unless you are referring to the link to organic syntheses. I personally believe that so long as they provide information which is not extensively duplicated in the article, it should stay. I won't really think of it as an advertisement. If there are too many external links though,
186:
earlier, and was thinking about reverting, but there is a link in the section which gives similar info, so I decided to let it go. These links are a bit difficult, I see that there are 79 links to that site in the wikipedia, many similar to the link on N-bromosuccinimide. I don't know what to do
925:
Question: since electronic articles are easiliy searchable, would you agree to condensing all the references to statutes to the main reference? I.e. instead of Id. or Ibid., section whatever, can we use the same footnote? I think there is a difference between the academic citation style and the
35:
to have the category on their page. Well, the category has already been nominated for deletion. The reasoning is because it is a "non-neutral" term and parental occupation is irrelevant. Thus, I'm letting people who have contributed to the Military brat article know so that they can support
751:
Hi Martin. You're very welcome. Things getting busy for me too. Solubility graph - I found that Excel can plot a nice curve. What screws it up is all the missing entries which make it look funny. I'm still looking at it but it's on the backburner for now. My apologies.
824:
Rifleman, I've finished messing with alkanes for the night - please see my comments on the talk page - I had a edit conflict with you earlier (my first!) so posted my changes to nomenclature on the talk page for you to review and add as you see fit. --
266:
I think if we can include them in the chemical sources template, it would be good. Both sites are actually rather good sources for information, and it'd be a shame to lose them on principle just because they are being spammed into wikipedia.
843:'. I didn't realize there was a template available for Singapore statutes. Is there a list of Singapore-related templates anywhere? Other articles you might want to re-template if you have time and the inclination to do so include ' 588:(the listings, for more exposure), since it won't affect us much. However, seeing some rather negative comments about science peer review on previous attempts, I think we should let our own peer review get more established first. -- 370:
It's supposed to be an open-ended project that concentrates more on expansion of stubs and finding reliable sources on potentially-problematic articles. You can put those articles you think need sourcing on the project page. -
937:
Cap. 7A" and the year of the revised edition of the Act can be added manually by authors of articles if they wish. I don't think it does any harm if the title of the Act appears in the main text and again in the footnote.
1131:
Thanks for fixing that, the article has so many references and they all bloody needed fixing when I found it, I may have made a few careless mistakes. Feel free to edit any others you feel can be improved, you've helped
530:
urlencode does not help here, I just tried to urlencode it in the document, the link then contains the .. err .. right characters, but one gets encoded wrongly by that function. No solution here for the moment ..
402:
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
437:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on
570:
banner. Give me a few days and I'll see if I can make it work. I'm definitely not going to do it like the MCB since I'm not confident with the "esoteric syntax", but I'll think if I can find a way. Cheers!
356:
try to contact him? Or failing that, have you tried to find anyone who can translate it? If I had the English translation, I could use Microsoft's Paint program to produce an English version. Regards, -
1167: 1087:
Thanks for the link, Martin. Didn't know you watched my usertalk. :) I suppose you got my message. Tweaking that the excel setting once is easier than selecting many cells invidiually. --
967:
I suppose the quickest way to look for articles relating to Singapore law is to visit the ']'. I've put articles relating to Singaporean legislation in a subcategory called ']'. Cheers,
615:
Ah... copy and paste it is then! I'll take a look at it later. Agree with you on blind - reading my past work is a painful experience, spotting all those errors I made then. --
1050: 152:
No problem at all. Your additions are great! I'll wait for you to draw the reactions because it'll be more consistent. I have incorporated Reppe chemistry into a section at
92:
Hi Rifleman, it'd be great if you wrote a summary after editing/reverting pages. I understand that popups negate summary of edits, but please write it in talk. Thanks. --
496:
am not the best at image manipulation. If you can find an image with a 12 carbon chain in the public domain or modify the images we have to have that, I'd be all for it.
650: 719: 872:
Oh, wow! Cool. I like the way you've linked the template to on-line versions of the statutes. Will there be a problem if the URLs of those statutes changes?
142:
Sorry for all the typos! I will go home soon, but tomorrow I will try to do some of the other images needed for the page. I like new fast growing articles!--
1067: 880:. In these cases, the statutes are cited thus: "Application of English Law Act 1993 (No. 35 of 1993)". It should still be possible to locate the statute on 510:
Yeeeh .. another one that breaks. Indeed, templates cannot carry parameters with certain characters in them, they break the layout. I encountered this in
444:. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 431: 921:
which make references to our statutes, and substitute with the template for a more consistent referencing style. Perhaps if you see any, you can help too.
722:- very useful, nicely done. Things are getting busy again for me, but I'll try to help whenever I can. Any luck with that solubility graph? Cheers, 445: 1096:
Yes, thanks, though I haven't had a chance to try it out yet. I want to do a graph on solubility vs. polarity of solvent that uses it. Cheers,
989:. It is very kind of you if you could take a look at the article (if you are interested in reviewing such articles) and comment on it. Thanks. 560:
Hi Dirk. Yes I did. A quick and dirty solution. I've seen the MCB page, and I'll be glad to give it a go at combining the peer review with our
449: 1163:
I noticed that you were involved in writing several high quality articles on science. Just in case you have time and interest in the topic:
1007:
My dear sir, not meaning to be rude, but kindly quote me the wikipedia guideline that justified the removal of Math-based equations on the
69:
Curious. As you show, they are the same document. Except, of course, that the text is substantially different, at least at the entry for
808:(resetting indents) Ah, I've found a better way. Do as before - select the entire area, without deselecting blanks. Click TOOLS --: --> 375: 1046: 930: 888: 855: 277: 276:
I have included them both (organic-chemistry was already there). I'll leave it for now, maybe it can be changed when we have a
160:
I'm not sure if you have, but if you haven't, would you take a look at the German and English articles closely, to look out for
914: 910: 399: 31:
Well, somebody beat me to the category of military brat, but I went through last night and updated all of the brats on the
250: 55:
I don't understand why you removed the reference to the Müller glossary (but left the footnote pointing to it) in the
37: 430:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,
423: 223: 898: 32: 77:
saying substantially the same thing. OK. I'll cite the Goldbook reference, and add Muller as an author to it.
840: 408: 390: 127:
Never mind, I'm quite busy nowadays, retiring from Knowledge (XXG) for a short while so do what you want. :P --
585: 547: 474: 458: 1174: 1125: 1100: 1091: 1074: 1057: 1039: 993: 971: 866: 829: 814: 790: 756: 726: 697: 656: 619: 606: 592: 575: 554: 535: 524: 500: 485: 463: 360: 338: 284: 271: 257: 212: 191: 172: 146: 131: 121: 107: 96: 81: 63: 42: 959: 848: 687: 324: 199:
I checked the NBS page and didn't see any link to organic-chemistry.org. I did a google and found them at
168:
errors? I went on a limb here and there, and used context without really understanding the German text. --
320: 918: 17: 395: 59:
page. The two glossaries listed are similar but the text is substantially different between the two.
128: 104: 93: 1143: 826: 942:
I think this can only be done to a certain extent and perhaps not in all cases. Where I have used
1149: 564: 497: 453: 372: 183: 1016: 1008: 1000: 482: 204: 78: 60: 1137: 1122: 1088: 1054: 986: 927: 863: 844: 811: 753: 653: 635: 616: 589: 572: 268: 209: 169: 118: 1070:, though unfortunately we never wrote this into the style guidelines. We probably should! 432:
requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license
514: 114: 39: 550:, it has the peer review build into their own template. Maybe also something for us? -- 237: 1032: 1097: 1071: 787: 723: 694: 603: 551: 546:
Hi, I saw you made a special template for peer review. I was looking around and saw
532: 521: 357: 349: 333: 281: 254: 188: 968: 885: 852: 677: 200: 249:
external links, they are not necessary. IMHO, both could be linked via a link on
218:
Ah, I see I was not really clear, sorry. I was referring to the link you removed:
1171: 1014:(PS Many other pages are having their equations converted to Math-Based too.) — 990: 1170:
for further improvement. Any suggestion will be very much appreciated. Thanks.
481:. Since you've helped with some of the associated pages, I'd like your input. 478: 143: 673:
Morning .. oh yeah, you're in Singapore, right? I haven't been playing with
153: 187:
with that .. remove (most of) them, or leave them in? Any suggestions? --
394:. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under 303: 876:
while statutes are not deemed important enough to be included in the
56: 950:
means that the two citations are identical. However, in the case of
73:. Such is life. Even though the texts and diagrams differ, they 946:
it is quite safe to refer to the first occurring footnote, as
810:
CHART (Tab), plot empty cells as interpolated. Much easier. --
881: 426:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. 1118:
your browser. You can take a look at what I did from here:
417:
without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template
926:
web-style due to the inherent differences in the media. --
366:
Re : Knowledge (XXG):SGpedians' notice board/Collaboration
1140:. I really wanna push for featured on this one, woop! :) 718:
Hey, just wanted to say thanks for all your work over at
584:
P.S. I was thinking of incorporating our own review into
298: 36:
keeping the category. Here is the link to the discussion
1133: 1119: 1045:
The appropriate forum for this matter to be decided is
884:. I think the template you've created is fine. Cheers, 440: 245: 1051:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Chemicals/Style_guidelines
638: 632:
Not in the best frame of mind for getting dizzy with
786:
the entire range of cells - then it works. Thanks,
448:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 398:, but its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles fails our 1136:Oh, and while I'm at it, thanks for the support on 909:Right now, I'm trying to find the articles such as 644: 835:Thanks for cleaning up 'Sources of Singapore law' 720:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Chemistry/Peer review 231:which is somewhat similar to the one still there: 693:parts .. did not know it existed. Cheers! -- 8: 683:yet, maybe I could use it in some of the 637: 434:, or by taking a picture of it yourself. 365: 253:template, and that should be enough. -- 182:Hi! I saw the addition of that link on 834: 238:N-Bromosuccinimide in Organic Syntheses 156:, and will use the same images as well. 1166:I would like to have your comments on 1047:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Chemistry 878:Statutes of the Republic of Singapore 7: 985:I posted a peer review request for 652:. I'll try again in the morning. -- 24: 1152:· 17:02, Sunday, 25 February 2007 894:I've updated the template since: 413:{{Replaceable fair use disputed}} 862:It can be changed if need be. -- 302: 113:Let's do the discussion only in 915:Capital punishment in Singapore 911:Misuse of Drugs Act (Singapore) 450:Media copyright questions page 1: 1175:18:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1126:16:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1101:03:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1092:03:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1075:03:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1058:02:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1040:02:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 994:15:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 815:18:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 791:18:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 757:15:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 727:05:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 317:for the following reason(s): 208:only the best should stay. -- 33:List of famous military brats 972:17:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 931:13:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 889:12:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 867:07:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 856:04:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 839:Hi, thanks for cleaning up ' 830:01:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 698:18:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 657:18:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 620:18:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 607:18:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 593:18:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 576:18:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 555:18:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 536:09:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 525:09:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 501:02:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 486:00:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 464:19:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 446:criteria for speedy deletion 376:16:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 361:07:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 339:06:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 311:Your request to be unblocked 132:16:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 122:15:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 108:12:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1066:The relevant discussion is 586:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review 285:18:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 272:18:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 258:17:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 213:17:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 192:17:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 173:16:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 147:16:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 97:15:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 82:20:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 64:19:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 43:20:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1190: 409:the image description page 391:Image:MATADOR (weapon).gif 384:Image:MATADOR (weapon).gif 348:German image deleted from 301: 251:wikipedia:chemical sources 882:Singapore Statutes Online 424:the image discussion page 978:Film director Kiarostami 841:Sources of Singapore law 548:Template:Wikiproject_MCB 400:first fair use criterion 645:{\displaystyle \wedge } 491:Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate 278:special:chemicalsources 960:Penal Code (Singapore) 849:Penal Code (Singapore) 646: 469:Eicosanoid Peer Review 224:Oxidizing Agents : --> 27:Category:Military brat 919:Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi 647: 388:Thanks for uploading 178:Organic-chemistry.org 18:User talk:Rifleman 82 1011:Page. Thanks a lot. 636: 1121:. Hope it helps. -- 411:and edit it to add 331:Request handled by: 327:lifted or expired. 1049:, where there are 642: 225:N-Bromosuccinimide 184:N-Bromosuccinimide 117:to avoid forks. -- 1153: 1036: 1009:Hydrogen Chloride 1001:Hydrogen Chloride 899:Singapore Statute 462: 459:banana receptacle 345: 344: 205:organic synthesis 1181: 1154: 1147: 1037: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1019: 987:Abbas Kiarostami 903: 897: 845:Law of Singapore 692: 686: 682: 676: 651: 649: 648: 643: 569: 563: 519: 513: 456: 443: 414: 336: 306: 299: 48:Adduct Reference 1189: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1161: 1141: 1115: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1005: 980: 901: 895: 837: 822: 809:OPTIONS --: --> 690: 684: 680: 674: 634: 633: 567: 561: 544: 517: 511: 508: 493: 473:I've asked for 471: 452:. Thank you. - 439: 412: 386: 368: 353: 334: 297: 180: 140: 115:Talk:Philip Yeo 90: 50: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1187: 1185: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1061: 1060: 1004: 997: 979: 976: 975: 974: 964: 963: 939: 938: 923: 922: 906: 905: 870: 869: 836: 833: 827:Quantockgoblin 821: 818: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 641: 625: 624: 623: 622: 610: 609: 598: 597: 596: 595: 579: 578: 543: 540: 539: 538: 507: 504: 492: 489: 470: 467: 428: 427: 420: 385: 382: 380: 367: 364: 352: 346: 343: 342: 319: 318: 307: 296: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 280:available. -- 261: 260: 241: 240: 233: 232: 228: 227: 220: 219: 179: 176: 158: 157: 139: 136: 135: 134: 111: 110: 89: 88:Summary please 86: 85: 84: 49: 46: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1186: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1169: 1164: 1158: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1139: 1135: 1134:a lot so far! 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1124: 1120: 1112: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1034: 1029: 1012: 1010: 1002: 998: 996: 995: 992: 988: 983: 977: 973: 970: 966: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 940: 935: 934: 933: 932: 929: 920: 916: 912: 908: 907: 900: 893: 892: 891: 890: 887: 883: 879: 873: 868: 865: 860: 859: 858: 857: 854: 850: 846: 842: 832: 831: 828: 819: 817: 816: 813: 792: 789: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 758: 755: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 728: 725: 721: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 699: 696: 695:Dirk Beetstra 689: 679: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 658: 655: 639: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 621: 618: 614: 613: 612: 611: 608: 605: 604:Dirk Beetstra 600: 599: 594: 591: 587: 583: 582: 581: 580: 577: 574: 566: 559: 558: 557: 556: 553: 552:Dirk Beetstra 549: 541: 537: 534: 533:Dirk Beetstra 529: 528: 527: 526: 523: 522:Dirk Beetstra 516: 505: 503: 502: 499: 490: 488: 487: 484: 480: 476: 468: 466: 465: 460: 455: 454:Tragic Baboon 451: 447: 442: 435: 433: 425: 421: 418: 410: 406: 405: 404: 401: 397: 393: 392: 383: 381: 378: 377: 374: 373:Mailer Diablo 363: 362: 359: 351: 350:Water cooling 347: 341: 340: 337: 332: 328: 326: 322: 316: 312: 308: 305: 300: 294: 286: 283: 282:Dirk Beetstra 279: 275: 274: 273: 270: 265: 264: 263: 262: 259: 256: 255:Dirk Beetstra 252: 247: 243: 242: 239: 235: 234: 230: 229: 226: 222: 221: 217: 216: 215: 214: 211: 206: 202: 197: 194: 193: 190: 189:Dirk Beetstra 185: 177: 175: 174: 171: 167: 163: 155: 151: 150: 149: 148: 145: 137: 133: 130: 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 116: 109: 106: 101: 100: 99: 98: 95: 87: 83: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 66: 65: 62: 58: 53: 47: 45: 44: 41: 38: 34: 26: 19: 1165: 1162: 1142: 1116: 1013: 1006: 984: 982:Hi Rifleman 981: 955: 951: 947: 943: 924: 877: 874: 871: 838: 823: 807: 545: 509: 494: 483:David.Throop 472: 436: 429: 416: 389: 387: 379: 369: 354: 330: 329: 325:137.132.3.11 314: 310: 309: 201:ionic liquid 198: 195: 181: 165: 161: 159: 141: 112: 91: 79:David.Throop 74: 70: 61:David.Throop 54: 51: 30: 1123:Rifleman 82 1089:Rifleman 82 1055:Rifleman 82 928:Rifleman 82 864:Rifleman 82 812:Rifleman 82 754:Rifleman 82 688:chembox new 654:Rifleman 82 617:Rifleman 82 590:Rifleman 82 573:Rifleman 82 475:Peer review 269:Rifleman 82 210:Rifleman 82 170:Rifleman 82 166:translation 129:218.186.9.3 119:Rifleman 82 105:218.186.9.3 94:218.186.9.3 1038:; Posted: 542:peerreview 479:Eicosanoid 244:there are 40:Balloonman 1113:Vitamin C 565:chemistry 441:this link 321:Autoblock 313:has been 295:Autoblock 246:79 others 236:Usage of 154:acetylene 1098:Walkerma 1072:Walkerma 956:op. cit. 788:Walkerma 724:Walkerma 396:fair use 358:mbeychok 196:Hi Dirk 52:Rifleman 1168:my work 1138:WP:ACID 969:Jacklee 886:Jacklee 853:Jacklee 847:' and ' 820:Alkanes 315:granted 162:factual 1172:Sangak 991:Sangak 917:, and 515:SMILES 498:AlexUF 407:Go to 71:adduct 57:Adduct 948:ibid. 944:ibid. 144:Stone 138:Reppe 16:< 1150:talk 1144:Jack 1068:here 1033:TALK 1003:Page 999:The 954:and 203:and 1159:FAC 952:id. 851:'. 678:and 602:-- 506:DOI 477:of 422:On 323:of 164:or 75:are 1148:· 913:, 902:}} 896:{{ 752:-- 691:}} 685:{{ 681:}} 675:{{ 640:∧ 571:-- 568:}} 562:{{ 531:-- 518:}} 512:{{ 415:, 267:-- 1035:) 1031:( 1027:2 1024:1 1021:6 1018:0 461:) 457:( 419:. 335:w

Index

User talk:Rifleman 82
List of famous military brats

Balloonman
20:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Adduct
David.Throop
19:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
David.Throop
20:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
218.186.9.3
15:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
218.186.9.3
12:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Philip Yeo
Rifleman 82
15:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
218.186.9.3
16:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Stone
16:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
acetylene
Rifleman 82
16:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
N-Bromosuccinimide
Dirk Beetstra
17:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
ionic liquid
organic synthesis
Rifleman 82

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.