Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Ritterschaft

Source 📝

38: 388:
I sort of have mixed feelings about the whole thing myself, but I'm content to let the experiment breathe for a while, because having two pages will forestall a more pointed content dispute. Thus far, people have been pretty gentle with you and Lima, but many people (not me) are losing patience. To
192:
Just tell me how to put it back like it was, or you put it back for me. I don't know exactly how to do it myself. But there is no excuse for what has happened, and I think its wrong to have the discussion on this side of things. The discussion should have happened first - that's what I want to put
352:
Maybe a "purgatory in RC teaching" would be a good idea, maybe it would be a bad idea. Right now, I'm just thinking about the audacious move, which I oppose for its own sake, other issues aside. The move is a separate matter from the content, since everything about it was wrong. As for you and I,
169:
Please do not keep taking it upon yourself to move around Purgatory. There is a AFD discussion ongoing as to whether the current structure should be kept or whether it should be deleted. If you scramble the content, the people who are trying to evaluate the situation will be unable to examine what
250:
I do understand your complaint about the controversial move. I think it may be a good idea, but I wouldn't have done it myself with quite the same manner and timing that Abtract did. If there were a simple revert button you could press to undo it, somebody could argue you'd be entitled to press
470:). You may prefer to remove this, after reading it. There is no need to do anything about Lw's planned RfC (jargon for something like "Referral for Comment" - I haven't gone to the trouble of finding out what exactly it is) on me: it will provide the usual amusement that he keeps giving. 173:
Maybe Abtract's change was a good one, maybe it was a bad one, almost certainly it was a bold one. But doing the same change, backwards, with an AFD discussion ongoing, accomplishes nothing but disruption. Remember there is no deadline, let the discussion play out, and if AFD decides to
119: 331:
and your liable to argue yourself right into deleting your own favored version of the article. Just a guess, but before you argue for delete, you might take a second to just make sure you really don't want there to be two articles here.
353:
I know we disagree on some things, but that's to be expected - people disagree. In the end it probably makes a better article. But neither you nor I have the desire to do anything disrespectful, audacious, or flagrantly inconsiderate.
379:. Which is to say, whether Abtract was bold and audacious or not, there's no sense stressing over spilt milk-- we should make our decisions not based on the audaciousness of the action, but on the appropriateness of the outcome. 301:
deleted or not. I'm not saying this as any authority, but speaking as someone who knows Knowledge (XXG) pretty well, if there's only one page, it's going to wind up having text that's a lot closer to the text that's on
505:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 223:
to Purgatory. In practice, I suspect any responsible admin will only take this step after the AFD discussion has concluded, and that discussion can only go forward if the AFD viewers get to see the two
251:
it-- but the MediaWiki software doesn't have such a button-- it requires a complex move be performed by an admin. So just sit back, build your consensus at AFD, and let the higher-ups sort it out. --
275:
and ask the same question there that you asked me, and see if I know what I'm talking about. I'm 90% sure that I do, but I've never been too involved with AFD, so it may be that I don't. :) --
105:
Thanks for some great work on this topic. I have taken the POV tag off, and restored just a little of the stuff you removed, but I think the article is so much better now. Regards
150:
You restored material from a self-published web site, in violation of WP policy, with no policy justification on the talk page. Please follow WP policy. I reverted the material.
466:
You may not look at this page frequently. I think it useful therefore to let you know, ahead of any action by Lw, of his declared intention to "get back into purgatory" (see
271:
At the same time, I realize you might be skeptical of my assessment, since we have a content disagreement. In that case, I would suggest that you go to the
272: 467: 177:
Even if you feel Abtract's change was an error, you don't have the power to correct this error, you can only exacerbate it. Please don't. --
530: 389:
have to pages is to avoid a content dispute that would be heated, but in which your POV would almost certainly wind up on the losing end.
233:
So, what you need to do, to make this back like it was, is not edit either article, but to argue strongly at the AFD discussion that
452:
Ritterschaft, I'm distressed about what's going on with purgatory. You don't seem happy yourself. What's going on? I've lost track.
26: 526: 438: 398:
So, even though I agree that the move was more bold than I myself tend to be, ultimately, I think it may be a good thing. --
22: 328: 307: 298: 234: 220: 517:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
522: 426: 174:
delete-merge the RC article back into main, it will require the assistants of an admin to get the histories right.
310:
right now. I might be wrong, but enough eyeballs are focusing on this issue that I suspect the text currently at
518: 403: 337: 280: 256: 182: 16: 494: 485: 514: 498: 457: 434: 155: 422: 30: 354: 194: 510: 502: 372: 399: 333: 276: 252: 215:, I've never done it, but I believe what has to happen is that an admin will have to delete 178: 513:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 506: 376: 241:. A closing admin will come along, assess the discussion, and make the necessary changes. 134: 106: 475: 453: 430: 151: 37: 118: 471: 311: 303: 238: 216: 534: 479: 461: 442: 407: 362: 341: 284: 260: 202: 186: 159: 137: 109: 15: 501:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
36: 468:
User_talk:Alecmconroy&diff=prev&oldid=194663290 here
297:
You might consider, though, whether you really want
133:Becasue you deserve it for picking up a hot potato 371:Well, two of our big things round these parts are 237:should be deleted and its contents copied back to 493:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 8: 273:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard 116: 314:is going to be the one that wins out. 7: 329:Purgatory, Roman Catholic teaching 308:Purgatory, Roman Catholic teaching 299:Purgatory, Roman Catholic teaching 235:Purgatory, Roman Catholic teaching 221:Purgatory, Roman Catholic teaching 193:it back for; for our discussion. 14: 519:review the candidates' statements 117: 525:. For the Election committee, 495:Arbitration Committee election 486:ArbCom elections are now open! 1: 535:13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 480:15:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 462:01:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 443:08:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 408:02:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 363:01:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 342:00:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 285:00:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 261:00:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 203:23:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 187:22:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 160:15:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 138:19:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 110:19:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 18:File:AMVC archive 070628.jpg 521:and submit your choices on 427:User:Ritterschaft/Userpage2 98:Perpetual virginity of Mary 550: 527:MediaWiki message delivery 306:than the text that's on 123: 41: 34: 499:Arbitration Committee 127:The Original Barnstar 40: 21: 503:arbitration process 327:Argue for deleting 515:arbitration policy 42: 35: 143: 142: 541: 377:Ignore all rules 121: 114: 113: 23:My Talk Archives 19: 549: 548: 544: 543: 542: 540: 539: 538: 523:the voting page 489: 450: 419: 167: 165:Purgatory moves 148: 100: 17: 12: 11: 5: 547: 545: 492: 488: 483: 449: 446: 418: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 393: 392: 391: 390: 383: 382: 381: 380: 366: 365: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 290: 289: 288: 287: 266: 265: 264: 263: 245: 244: 243: 242: 228: 227: 226: 225: 206: 205: 166: 163: 147: 144: 141: 140: 130: 129: 124: 122: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 88: 87: 86: 85: 84: 83: 82: 81: 80: 79: 78: 77: 76: 75: 74: 73: 72: 71: 70: 69: 68: 67: 66: 65: 64: 63: 62: 61: 60: 59: 58: 57: 56: 55: 54: 53: 52: 51: 50: 49: 48: 47: 46: 45: 44: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 546: 537: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 487: 484: 482: 481: 477: 473: 469: 464: 463: 459: 455: 447: 445: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 421:I have moved 416: 409: 405: 401: 397: 396: 395: 394: 387: 386: 385: 384: 378: 374: 370: 369: 368: 367: 364: 360: 356: 351: 350: 343: 339: 335: 330: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 313: 309: 305: 300: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 268: 267: 262: 258: 254: 249: 248: 247: 246: 240: 236: 232: 231: 230: 229: 222: 218: 214: 210: 209: 208: 207: 204: 200: 196: 191: 190: 189: 188: 184: 180: 175: 171: 164: 162: 161: 157: 153: 145: 139: 136: 132: 131: 128: 125: 120: 115: 112: 111: 108: 103: 97: 95: 92: 39: 32: 28: 24: 20: 490: 465: 451: 420: 358: 355:Ritterschaft 219:, then move 212: 198: 195:Ritterschaft 176: 172: 168: 149: 126: 104: 101: 93: 43: 31:Storehouse 2 27:Storehouse 1 400:Alecmconroy 334:Alecmconroy 277:Alecmconroy 253:Alecmconroy 179:Alecmconroy 511:topic bans 170:was done. 135:Springnuts 107:Springnuts 507:site bans 448:Purgatory 423:Userpage2 417:Purgatory 312:Purgatory 304:Purgatory 239:Purgatory 217:Purgatory 454:Leadwind 439:contribs 431:RHaworth 152:Leadwind 373:Be Bold 213:believe 146:Dragani 497:. The 224:pages. 429:. -- 531:talk 476:talk 472:Lima 458:talk 435:Talk 404:talk 375:and 359:talk 338:talk 281:talk 257:talk 199:talk 183:talk 156:talk 102:Hi, 491:Hi, 425:to 25:. 533:) 509:, 478:) 460:) 441:) 437:| 406:) 361:) 340:) 332:-- 283:) 259:) 211:I 201:) 185:) 158:) 529:( 474:( 456:( 433:( 410:t 402:( 357:( 336:( 279:( 255:( 197:( 181:( 154:( 33:. 29:.

Index

File:AMVC archive 070628.jpg
My Talk Archives
Storehouse 1
Storehouse 2

Springnuts
19:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Springnuts
19:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Leadwind
talk
15:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Alecmconroy
talk
22:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Ritterschaft
talk
23:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Purgatory
Purgatory, Roman Catholic teaching
Purgatory, Roman Catholic teaching
Purgatory
Alecmconroy
talk
00:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard
Alecmconroy
talk
00:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.