1176:. Are you sure were not talking about censorship here? You purposefully misquoted me too. The full quote is "Oh come on, a few instances of adding images of people masturbating and orgasming to articles on masturbation and orgasms is not 'porn trolling.'" I imagine that the purpose of the misquote was to paint me as some kind of immoral "porn disruptor," when it is actually just a content dispute. This attitude is just another example of why I wanted that account to remain private.
26:
539:
1120:
1960:
1922:
1884:
1846:
1808:
1770:
1732:
1694:
1656:
1618:
1580:
1542:
1504:
1466:
164:
369:
916:). It wasn't intended to be disruptive sock puppetry. It was just meant to be a private account lying low, and I didn't expect this kind of backlash against a few photos of naked people. Isn't offering to compromise and find consensus prior to the block already evidence that an unblock won't be disruptive (without even mentioning all the other positive contributions I've made)?
1210:
make this all something else other than VF9's violation of the three-revert rule & attempts to cover up any activity by deleting warnings from VF9's talk page. Please, do not take my word for it, review the edits. I am confident others will find accuracy in my statement that this editor fails to take responsibility for their own actions & instead blames everybody else.
294:
1402:
1361:
1320:
serious issue. I see a lot of weaseling/wikilawyering, and very little skill in collaborative working. Indefinite doesn't have to mean 'forever', but a long period away from the project to gain some maturity would be beneficial to all. I respect some of their contributions in the earth and biological sciences, but that's as far as it goes.
789:. That is simply content I added in good faith that you dislike. The fact you included it in one of the examples of my alleged "nasty bahaviour" just proves you're not really against my actions and are instead against the material. That kind of thinking is exactly why I wanted to keep those kinds of contributions private IRL.
707:
Like I said above, I really just want to positively contribute to
Knowledge. Instead of focusing on a few heated content disputes, please focus on all the vandalism I've fought, the pages I've saved from deletion, the pages I've created, and all the other constructive edits I've made. I'll definitely
1002:
It's not sudden or interesting. The account was blocked at the same time as this main one, and listed publicly as a sockpuppet under this account. You can easily find it. I just felt like your comment was a good prompt to explain the motivation behind it. If you want to checkuser me again, go ahead.
912:
Oh come on, a few instances of adding images of people masturbating and orgasming to articles on masturbation and orgasms is not "porn trolling." However, before I added them, I was unaware of the unwritten policy against staged explicit photos, which I'm sorry for. I mean, I had already offered to
685:
That aside, I will address the insultingly wrong complaints made against me. The examples given never showed any examples of wikilawyering, nastiness, or "gaming the system." I cited relevant policies (or at least what I thought were relevant at the time), used the talk page, was always polite, and
1265:
I know that this is painful for you to be blocked when you thought you were doing good things for
Knowledge, but you egregiously violated policy with your sock puppet, which in itself is a transgression that can get one banned. But blaming others for the results of your own actions will just be an
1209:
when
RockingGeo accuses me of censorship. My speedy deletion tags were solely due to my perception that anything with copyright markings within the image was potentially in violation of CC. As it turns out, I was wrong on that account, & acknowledged it on Commons. However, RockingGeo wants to
848:
applies because we were communicating through the edit summary. Though if I'm wrong in these cases, I'll admit to it and change my ways. Arbitrarily assuming I didn't choose not to revert that edit in the orgasm article is at best not assuming good faith and at worst is an example of your bias in
1072:
As it was supposed to be a private account, I obviously did not want to say that I had another account. For full context, the relevant statement they gave was, "You have learned a lot of blue links in your two-week wiki-career but their meaning takes longer to absorb. In brief, none of the above
256:
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality
Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it.
1253:
You restored your own edits 3 times by reversion on
Masturbation within 61 minutes, & you reverted Deepfake 3 times without any discussion on Talk:Deepfake. Yes, technically WP:3RR typically applies to reverts in excess of three, but the policy also states: "Even without a 3RR violation, an
1319:
Just investigating and responding fairly to the complaint made against VF9 at ANI made me conclude this person and their confrontational/challenging approach to everyone else was far from a net positive to the project. That they were running two or more very active accounts simultaneously is a
983:
Interesting that now they suddenly reveal they had this account also. Which account is this? And that it was blocked does imply CheckUser would have found any sleepers; but if it would not have, definitely worth checking, in case this last comment is an attempt to forestall further CheckUser
1146:
policies. Even now, this editor dismissively refers to these disruptions with the statement "Oh come on, a few instances of adding images of people masturbating and orgasming..." This is not about censorship; this is about behavior. I see no reason to unblock while this editor fails to take
961:
with. After learning how much I enjoy maintenance, I wanted to focus on WikiGnoming for awhile. I haven't made many edits with it, as the transition was going to be next month, but you can see that it's all maintenance related. Further evidence that I'm not a malicious sock-puppeteer.
692:). I don't know what was meant by "gaming the system," but I can assure you that I had no such intention. As I said above, I didn't use alternate accounts to promote my side. I really wanted them to be as separate as possible. Also, regarding the "edit-warring," I was trying to reach
253:, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Knowledge.
545:
To the uninvolved admin making the final decision, please keep in mind that the users below were involved in a heated content dispute with me prior to this block. Their input may not be 100% unbiased, and their underlying motivations may be punitive instead preventative.
733:
where you reverted 3 times, the maximum amount under 3RR. And as to whether anyone should believe
RockingGeo/VF9's sudden contrition, their behavior when not blocked speaks for itself, both in discussions as linked above and in article histories.
454:
I had recently created new accounts for privacy reasons. I wasn't vandalizing
Knowledge or creating the illusion of support. I didn't edit on the same topics with the same accounts, and I don't think I made any other improper edits per
1054:. I had indirectly raised the issue of their background by referring to VF9's "two-week wiki-career". VF9 might have ignored the point or acknowledged that they had a prior account. Instead, VF9 gave an evasive reply and referred to
570:
I, for one, was not involved in any 'heated dispute' whatsoever, didn't interact directly with this person apart from via edit summaries, and have no underlying motive other than to protect the project from non-constructive editors.
885:
I am not using my administrative toolset in this matter, so "involved" does not apply. The VF9 sockpuppet account has engaged in disruptive porn trolling behavior in recent days. Disruptive sockpuppetry cannot be tolerated. I see
492:
Per comments below. RockingGeo's argument that the people commenting are "involved" is unpersuasive (are they more involved than you are?). And it's not just that you created a sock, but the bad behavior of that sock, violating
1266:
exercise in futility. Just look at the opposition to unblocking you. I would advise following a path of contriteness, apology, & accepting responsibility. Without that, your words are unimportant & I do not hear them.
696:, as I felt that the appropriate response to the complaint could be stated in an edit summary. When I realized there would be more opposition than I originally thought, I stopped editing and used the talk page, per
207:
939:
As an additional note, I'm not totally clear on how CheckUser works, but if it was used only on the
RockingGeo and VF9 accounts, and any CheckUsers are reading, it may be worth checking for sleepers.
191:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1165:
and used the talk page when that became untenable to avoid edit warring. I've also already explained that I had legitimate uses for having alternate accounts. This is just rehashing old arguments.
177:
1442:
I've just made an edit request to the semi-protected article
Volcano and I need a consensus. I know that you made contributions to the article. Care to take a look? Kind regards,
463:
rule, and I won't do it again. I want to keep making positive contributions to
Knowledge. I have a history of being positively involved in anti-vandalism (I even got a barnstar).
1372:
1971:
1933:
1895:
1857:
1819:
1781:
1743:
1705:
1667:
1629:
1591:
1553:
1515:
1255:
1477:
1413:
682:
Considering that you're all involved in recent content disputes with me, it would be best for you to avoid this discussion, as it's obviously a conflict of interest.
1849:
1838:
1228:. You're making unfounded claims. And I fully admit that I deleted warnings from my talk page, but there's no policy against that. I'm free to do what I want on
647:, who (like Crossroads) dealt with the bulk of RockingGeo's edits as VF9. Also, a CheckUser can look into how accurate RockingGeo's "privacy reasons" claim is.
530:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
264:
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
1174:
1224:
If I mistook your actions for censorship, then I apologize, but in all fairness, they seem like something a censor would do. Also, I never violated the
1171:
409:
1073:
apply in this case" And my reply was, "Saying that the policies don't apply because I'm too new to understand them is condescending and violates
330:
1169:
1963:
1952:
1469:
1458:
1735:
1724:
1659:
1648:
229:
1697:
1686:
1621:
1610:
822:. You weren't reverted at Orgasm until you were at ANI a mere 1 hour before your block, so you get no credit for not edit warring there.
1507:
1496:
786:, (or was planning on using the relevant the talk pages after I woke up but was blocked by then). And I didn't even make any reverts on
515:
337:
1232:
talk page. A deletion is an acknowledgement of them. Why don't you focus on the fact that I never violated any final warnings instead?
1967:
1929:
1891:
1853:
1815:
1777:
1739:
1701:
1663:
1625:
1587:
1549:
1511:
1473:
1395:
1354:
1337:
Given the blocked editor interest in Knowledge and his pleas, I call for a limited block period and a probation period after that. --
1811:
1800:
1161:
When was I disrespectful? I've already linked examples of me trying to find consensus. And I've already stated I was trying to find
1205:
I invite all to review both my & VF9's edits & edit summaries on enwiki & commons. I believe RockingGeo is offering a
1887:
1876:
404:
840:
Please assume good faith, a misinterpretation of a policy is not automatically wikilawyering. In my opinion, the spirit of the
225:
95:
Hardly any football here, leastwise until the Patriots are in the playoffs. The rest of Boston's teams deserve the love more.
1092:
1545:
1534:
1773:
1762:
200:
111:
108:
54:
51:
957:
In full disclosure, I had another account (which has also been blocked by the CheckUser) that I was planning to make a
1583:
1572:
212:
1925:
1914:
729:
Not any more a conflict of interest than you have. And the bad behavior only stops when totally outnumbered, as at
381:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1074:
1047:
382:
307:
302:
1979:
1941:
1903:
1865:
1827:
1789:
1751:
1713:
1675:
1637:
1599:
1561:
1523:
1375:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards,
652:
605:
423:
376:
278:
261:
and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
1162:
845:
815:
775:
693:
459:. I really tried to follow the instructions for using privacy accounts. I'm sorry if I accidentally broke a
323:
316:
312:
96:
39:
1421:
1051:
1254:
administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may
782:. As I've said, once I realized there was more opposition than I anticipated, I used the talk pages, per
1368:
708:
avoid contributing to controversial topics in the future, and I'll avoid any more of this stupid drama.
188:
1416:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
764:
exists; just apply the same logic to yourself when discussing severe administrative actions like this.
1485:
1325:
1295:
993:
958:
948:
831:
774:
are a very small amount of the total contributions I've made to Knowledge. They are also examples of
751:
617:
576:
1975:
1937:
1899:
1861:
1823:
1785:
1747:
1709:
1671:
1633:
1595:
1557:
1519:
1342:
1004:
896:
648:
274:
1409:
1382:
1273:
1215:
1152:
1086:
1063:
841:
811:
761:
591:
502:
258:
250:
1447:
1417:
819:
598:
portions of BADSOCK. And even aside from that, the behavior of them and especially their sock
456:
171:
25:
267:
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
1126:
Indefinite blocks are the remedy for sock puppetry. This editor has clearly disregarded the
1081:." Nothing I said was a falsehood, nor was it inappropriate given the context. If anything,
1058:
as if they were a brand new user. Such behavior is corrosive and damaging to the community.
524:
343:
219:
184:
199:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1481:
1436:
1321:
1287:
1282:"hen you thought you were doing good things for Knowledge" - I don't know about that one.
1234:
1178:
1097:
1009:
985:
964:
940:
918:
851:
823:
791:
743:
710:
663:
644:
609:
572:
548:
538:
465:
387:
357:
129:
75:
1119:
1338:
1283:
1143:
1078:
1055:
891:
636:
595:
494:
460:
196:
1376:
1269:
1225:
1211:
1148:
1131:
1127:
1082:
1059:
1041:
779:
701:
697:
640:
632:
498:
192:
1443:
1139:
1135:
730:
602:
consists of wikilawyering, gaming the system, edit warring, and general nastiness.
689:(or at least tried to reach a compromise during those disputes I wasn't convinced
163:
1206:
1168:
And the images referred to are the same ones you tried to have speedy deleted
353:
890:
evidence that the disruption would not resume if this editor was unblocked.
1003:
Like I said, I have a full intention of doing everything legitimately, per
293:
1147:
responsibility for their own actions & instead blames everybody else.
1037:
599:
336:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
1983:
1945:
1907:
1869:
1831:
1793:
1755:
1717:
1679:
1641:
1603:
1565:
1527:
1489:
1451:
1425:
1401:
1388:
1360:
1346:
1329:
1299:
1277:
1248:
1219:
1192:
1156:
1111:
1067:
1023:
997:
978:
952:
932:
903:
865:
835:
805:
755:
724:
677:
656:
621:
580:
562:
505:
479:
361:
340:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
282:
233:
203:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
143:
122:
89:
65:
1373:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 30#Lst of vegan media
243:
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
181:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
603:
1036:
Would the reviewing admin please consider a comment by the sock
216:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
607:
206:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
1414:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 2#Ape research
1095:)'s condescending attitude is the actual corrosive behaviour.
814:
applies to admins taking action, not discussion participants.
783:
1400:
1359:
367:
292:
329:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
512:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
532:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
175:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1964:
Template:Legality of primate use in scientific research
1953:
Template:Legality of primate use in scientific research
914:
787:
772:
770:
768:
741:
739:
737:
735:
690:
687:
437:
433:
427:
418:
414:
400:
396:
392:
187:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1470:
Template:Legality of zoophilia by country or territory
1459:
Template:Legality of zoophilia by country or territory
1736:
Template:World laws on killing horses for consumption
1725:
Template:World laws on killing horses for consumption
1660:
Template:World laws on killing cattle for consumption
1649:
Template:World laws on killing cattle for consumption
1408:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
1367:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
38:
Lotta vitriol against this quarterback tonight, huh?
375:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1698:
Template:World laws on killing dogs for consumption
1687:
Template:World laws on killing dogs for consumption
1622:
Template:World laws on killing cats for consumption
1611:
Template:World laws on killing cats for consumption
1970:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1932:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1894:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1856:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1818:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1780:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1742:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1704:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1666:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1628:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1590:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1552:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1514:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1508:Template:World laws pertaining to animal sentience
1497:Template:World laws pertaining to animal sentience
1476:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
661:Does a checkuser know who knows my real identity?
1258:with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is
1972:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1934:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1896:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1858:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1850:Template:World laws on cosmetic animal testing
1839:Template:World laws on cosmetic animal testing
1820:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1812:Template:World laws on killing animals for fur
1801:Template:World laws on killing animals for fur
1782:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1744:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1706:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1668:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1630:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1592:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1554:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1516:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1478:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1431:Your opinion on Volcanos article edit proposal
1262:to revert a page a specific number of times."
8:
158:
73:Thanks! And I don't even watch football!
844:policy applies here, and I still think
1546:Template:World laws on animal cruelty
1535:Template:World laws on animal cruelty
7:
1774:Template:World laws on shark fishing
1763:Template:World laws on shark fishing
172:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
315:. Note that multiple accounts are
155:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
127:I wish I knew what that meant. :)
14:
1958:
1920:
1888:Template:World bullfighting bans
1882:
1877:Template:World bullfighting bans
1844:
1806:
1768:
1730:
1692:
1654:
1616:
1584:Template:Animal rights at the UN
1578:
1573:Template:Animal rights at the UN
1540:
1502:
1464:
1118:
537:
162:
24:
1412:. The discussion will occur at
1371:. The discussion will occur at
1353:"Lst of vegan media" listed at
210:and submit your choices on the
118:
100:
61:
43:
1173:, and an admin had to step in
913:compromise with you (example:
590:- their behavior violates the
107:
103:
50:
46:
1:
1347:19:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
1330:09:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1300:17:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1278:17:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1249:06:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1220:06:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1193:06:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1157:06:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1112:05:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1068:05:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1024:06:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
998:06:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
979:05:28, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
953:05:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
933:05:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
904:04:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
866:05:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
836:05:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
806:04:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
756:04:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
725:04:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
678:03:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
657:03:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
622:03:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
581:19:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
563:06:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
506:13:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
480:22:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
362:13:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
283:21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
234:00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
189:Knowledge arbitration process
144:06:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
123:06:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
112:
90:06:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
66:06:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
55:
115:
58:
1951:Nomination for deletion of
1913:Nomination for deletion of
1875:Nomination for deletion of
1837:Nomination for deletion of
1799:Nomination for deletion of
1761:Nomination for deletion of
1723:Nomination for deletion of
1685:Nomination for deletion of
1647:Nomination for deletion of
1609:Nomination for deletion of
1571:Nomination for deletion of
1533:Nomination for deletion of
1495:Nomination for deletion of
1457:Nomination for deletion of
1452:00:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
1335:Limited block and probation
1128:respect and civility pillar
379:, who declined the request.
97:
40:
32:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
1999:
1926:Template:World circus bans
1915:Template:World circus bans
1389:19:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
686:admitted when I was wrong
331:may be reverted or deleted
226:MediaWiki message delivery
1984:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1946:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1908:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1870:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1832:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1794:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1756:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1718:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1680:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1642:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1604:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1566:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1528:00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1394:"Ape research" listed at
1284:AGF is not a suicide pact
516:guide to appealing blocks
338:guide to appealing blocks
313:abusing multiple accounts
23:
1490:22:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
1396:Redirects for discussion
1355:Redirects for discussion
631:per Crossroads. Pinging
224:to your user talk page.
1426:23:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
1052:05:58, 25 November 2019
1968:nominated for deletion
1930:nominated for deletion
1892:nominated for deletion
1854:nominated for deletion
1816:nominated for deletion
1778:nominated for deletion
1740:nominated for deletion
1702:nominated for deletion
1664:nominated for deletion
1626:nominated for deletion
1588:nominated for deletion
1550:nominated for deletion
1512:nominated for deletion
1474:nominated for deletion
1405:
1364:
372:
297:
1404:
1363:
424:change block settings
371:
348:Your reason here ~~~~
296:
185:Arbitration Committee
169:Hello! Voting in the
810:More wikilawyering.
1256:report edit warring
818:explicitly forbids
275:User:Martin Urbanec
17:A barnstar for you!
1406:
1369:Lst of vegan media
1365:
1260:not an entitlement
1140:dispute resolution
1075:WP:PERSONALATTACKS
760:There is a reason
373:
298:
257:Please sign up at
201:arbitration policy
849:this discussion.
311:from editing for
240:
239:
71:
70:
1990:
1962:
1961:
1924:
1923:
1886:
1885:
1848:
1847:
1810:
1809:
1772:
1771:
1734:
1733:
1696:
1695:
1658:
1657:
1620:
1619:
1582:
1581:
1544:
1543:
1506:
1505:
1468:
1467:
1385:
1379:
1247:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1191:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1163:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
1122:
1110:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1012:
977:
975:
971:
967:
931:
929:
925:
921:
901:
899:Let's discuss it
864:
862:
858:
854:
846:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
816:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
804:
802:
798:
794:
776:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
723:
721:
717:
713:
694:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
676:
674:
670:
666:
561:
559:
555:
551:
541:
529:
523:
478:
476:
472:
468:
443:
441:
430:
412:
410:deleted contribs
370:
351:
259:the contest page
223:
166:
159:
142:
140:
136:
132:
120:
117:
114:
110:
105:
102:
99:
88:
86:
82:
78:
63:
60:
57:
53:
48:
45:
42:
28:
21:
20:
1998:
1997:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1959:
1956:
1921:
1918:
1883:
1880:
1845:
1842:
1807:
1804:
1769:
1766:
1731:
1728:
1693:
1690:
1655:
1652:
1617:
1614:
1579:
1576:
1541:
1538:
1503:
1500:
1465:
1462:
1433:
1399:
1383:
1377:
1358:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1233:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1177:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1096:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1008:
984:investigation.
973:
969:
965:
963:
927:
923:
919:
917:
897:
860:
856:
852:
850:
800:
796:
792:
790:
719:
715:
711:
709:
672:
668:
664:
662:
557:
553:
549:
547:
535:
527:
521:
520:, then use the
509:
483:
474:
470:
466:
464:
431:
421:
407:
390:
383:blocking policy
368:
365:
364:
341:
334:
290:
245:
217:
157:
138:
134:
130:
128:
84:
80:
76:
74:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1996:
1994:
1976:WikiCleanerMan
1955:
1949:
1938:WikiCleanerMan
1917:
1911:
1900:WikiCleanerMan
1879:
1873:
1862:WikiCleanerMan
1841:
1835:
1824:WikiCleanerMan
1803:
1797:
1786:WikiCleanerMan
1765:
1759:
1748:WikiCleanerMan
1727:
1721:
1710:WikiCleanerMan
1689:
1683:
1672:WikiCleanerMan
1651:
1645:
1634:WikiCleanerMan
1613:
1607:
1596:WikiCleanerMan
1575:
1569:
1558:WikiCleanerMan
1537:
1531:
1520:WikiCleanerMan
1499:
1493:
1461:
1455:
1432:
1429:
1398:
1392:
1357:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1332:
1317:Oppose unblock
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1267:
1263:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1166:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
937:
936:
935:
907:
906:
883:Oppose unblock
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
765:
705:
683:
680:
649:Flyer22 Reborn
625:
624:
585:
584:
583:
510:
490:
486:Decline reason
452:
448:Request reason
445:
366:
335:
300:You have been
299:
291:
289:
286:
251:Google Code-In
244:
241:
238:
237:
208:the candidates
178:eligible users
167:
156:
153:
151:
149:
148:
147:
146:
69:
68:
35:
34:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1995:
1986:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1954:
1950:
1948:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1916:
1912:
1910:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1878:
1874:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1840:
1836:
1834:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1802:
1798:
1796:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1764:
1760:
1758:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1726:
1722:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1688:
1684:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1650:
1646:
1644:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1612:
1608:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1574:
1570:
1568:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1536:
1532:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1498:
1494:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1460:
1456:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1440:
1438:
1430:
1428:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1403:
1397:
1393:
1391:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1380:
1374:
1370:
1362:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1261:
1257:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1246:
1238:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1194:
1190:
1182:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1145:
1144:sock puppetry
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1124:No to unblock
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1101:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1025:
1021:
1013:
1006:
1001:
1000:
999:
995:
991:
990:
989:
982:
981:
980:
976:
968:
960:
959:WP:CLEANSTART
956:
955:
954:
950:
946:
945:
944:
938:
934:
930:
922:
915:
911:
910:
909:
908:
905:
902:
900:
895:
894:
889:
884:
881:
880:
867:
863:
855:
847:
843:
839:
838:
837:
833:
829:
828:
827:
821:
817:
813:
809:
808:
807:
803:
795:
788:
785:
781:
777:
773:
771:
769:
766:
763:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
748:
747:
742:
740:
738:
736:
732:
728:
727:
726:
722:
714:
706:
703:
699:
695:
691:
688:
684:
681:
679:
675:
667:
660:
659:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
627:
626:
623:
619:
615:
614:
613:
608:
606:
604:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
582:
578:
574:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
560:
552:
544:
540:
534:
533:
526:
519:
517:
508:
507:
504:
500:
496:
489:
487:
482:
481:
477:
469:
462:
458:
451:
449:
444:
439:
435:
429:
425:
420:
416:
411:
406:
402:
401:global blocks
398:
397:active blocks
394:
389:
384:
380:
378:
377:administrator
363:
359:
355:
349:
345:
339:
332:
328:
326:
325:
318:
314:
310:
309:
305:
304:
295:
288:November 2019
287:
285:
284:
280:
276:
271:
268:
265:
262:
260:
254:
252:
248:
242:
236:
235:
231:
227:
221:
215:
214:
209:
204:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
180:
179:
174:
173:
168:
165:
161:
160:
154:
152:
145:
141:
133:
126:
125:
124:
121:
109:
106:
94:
93:
92:
91:
87:
79:
67:
64:
52:
49:
37:
36:
33:
30:
27:
22:
16:
1957:
1919:
1881:
1843:
1805:
1767:
1729:
1691:
1653:
1615:
1577:
1539:
1501:
1463:
1441:
1434:
1418:SpicyMilkBoy
1410:Ape research
1407:
1381:
1366:
1334:
1316:
1290:-Crossroads-
1289:
1288:
1259:
1242:
1229:
1186:
1136:edit warring
1123:
1105:
1089:
1044:
1017:
1005:WP:SOCKLEGIT
988:-Crossroads-
987:
986:
972:
943:-Crossroads-
942:
941:
926:
898:
892:
887:
882:
859:
826:-Crossroads-
825:
824:
820:edit warring
799:
746:-Crossroads-
745:
744:
731:Masturbation
718:
671:
629:Keep blocked
628:
612:-Crossroads-
611:
610:
588:Keep blocked
587:
556:
542:
536:
531:
513:
511:
491:
485:
484:
473:
453:
447:
446:
419:creation log
386:
374:
347:
324:illegitimate
322:
320:
308:indefinitely
306:
301:
272:
269:
266:
263:
255:
249:
246:
211:
205:
182:
176:
170:
150:
137:
83:
72:
31:
1207:red herring
842:WP:INVOLVED
812:WP:INVOLVED
762:WP:INVOLVED
592:WP:SCRUTINY
270:Thank you!
213:voting page
1482:Beeblebrox
1437:RockingGeo
1322:Nick Moyes
1236:RockingGeo
1180:RockingGeo
1130:& the
1099:RockingGeo
1011:RockingGeo
966:RockingGeo
920:RockingGeo
853:RockingGeo
793:RockingGeo
712:RockingGeo
665:RockingGeo
645:Nick Moyes
573:Nick Moyes
550:RockingGeo
467:RockingGeo
457:WP:BADSOCK
415:filter log
388:RockingGeo
197:topic bans
131:RockingGeo
77:RockingGeo
1966:has been
1928:has been
1890:has been
1852:has been
1814:has been
1776:has been
1738:has been
1700:has been
1662:has been
1624:has been
1586:has been
1548:has been
1510:has been
1472:has been
1339:Thinker78
1132:concensus
637:Cullen328
514:read the
434:checkuser
393:block log
193:site bans
1270:Peaceray
1212:Peaceray
1149:Peaceray
1142:, &
1093:contribs
1083:Johnuniq
1060:Johnuniq
1048:contribs
641:Peaceray
633:Johnuniq
600:User:VF9
543:Comment:
499:Bishonen
405:contribs
346:|reason=
321:not for
247:Hello,
1444:Coel Jo
1079:WP:BITE
1056:WP:BITE
767:Again,
596:WP:HAND
525:unblock
495:WP:HAND
461:WP:SOCK
428:unblock
344:unblock
327:reasons
317:allowed
303:blocked
220:NoACEMM
1435:Hello
1226:WP:3RR
1077:, per
893:Cullen
780:WP:3RR
778:, not
702:WP:3RR
698:WP:BRD
643:, and
319:, but
119:myself
62:myself
1378:SONIC
518:first
354:Bbb23
1980:talk
1942:talk
1904:talk
1866:talk
1828:talk
1790:talk
1752:talk
1714:talk
1676:talk
1638:talk
1600:talk
1562:talk
1524:talk
1486:talk
1448:talk
1422:talk
1343:talk
1326:talk
1296:talk
1274:talk
1244:Talk
1216:talk
1188:Talk
1153:talk
1107:Talk
1087:talk
1064:talk
1042:talk
1019:Talk
994:talk
974:Talk
949:talk
928:Talk
888:zero
861:Talk
832:talk
801:Talk
752:talk
720:Talk
700:and
673:Talk
653:talk
618:talk
594:and
577:talk
558:Talk
503:talk
475:Talk
358:talk
333:.
279:talk
230:talk
183:The
139:Talk
85:Talk
1384:678
1050:):
1038:VF9
784:BRD
438:log
385:).
352:.
113:are
101:who
56:are
44:who
1982:)
1974:.
1944:)
1936:.
1906:)
1898:.
1868:)
1860:.
1830:)
1822:.
1792:)
1784:.
1754:)
1746:.
1716:)
1708:.
1678:)
1670:.
1640:)
1632:.
1602:)
1594:.
1564:)
1556:.
1526:)
1518:.
1488:)
1480:.
1450:)
1439:,
1424:)
1345:)
1328:)
1298:)
1286:.
1276:)
1240:岩石
1230:my
1218:)
1184:岩石
1155:)
1138:,
1134:,
1103:岩石
1066:)
1015:岩石
1007:.
996:)
970:岩石
951:)
924:岩石
857:岩石
834:)
797:岩石
754:)
716:岩石
669:岩石
655:)
639:,
635:,
620:)
579:)
554:岩石
528:}}
522:{{
501:|
497:.
488::
471:岩石
450::
432:•
426:•
422:•
417:•
413:•
408:•
403:•
399:•
395:•
360:)
350:}}
342:{{
281:)
273:--
232:)
222:}}
218:{{
195:,
135:岩石
116:is
104:am
98:he
81:岩石
59:is
47:am
41:he
1978:(
1940:(
1902:(
1864:(
1826:(
1788:(
1750:(
1712:(
1674:(
1636:(
1598:(
1560:(
1522:(
1484:(
1446:(
1420:(
1341:(
1324:(
1294:(
1272:(
1214:(
1151:(
1090:·
1085:(
1062:(
1045:·
1040:(
992:(
947:(
830:(
750:(
704:.
651:(
616:(
575:(
442:)
440:)
436:(
391:(
356:(
277:(
228:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
