535:," and I, for one, couldn't be more insulted by that characterisation. I am one of the only people who edit the 2008 season articles and the US Open Cup articles and I also edit the USMNT, SuperLiga, CONCACAF Champions League, and all other MLS and US Soccer related articles. I care passionately about US soccer, and for you to insinuate that I don't, or that I have some bias against it, is insulting. All I want is for the articles to be as well written as they can be. MLS values the Supporters' Shield as a major trophy, as do the clubs who win it. I know that the award was created as an unofficial award by the fans, but since that time it has become a major trophy in US soccer. The
457:
than willing to get involved, and would love to work with you on such a project. Let me know any additional information about this. I've only been editing regularly on WP for six months, but I've tought myself quite a bit about markup and template coding recently and would love to extend my repetoire into this area as well. I look forward to working with you on this. --
66:
731:
139:
I tried to find a page on target language but was re-directed to the translation page. I was going to ask on the talk page of the translation article why that re-direct was there when I saw your same question from about 6 months ago. I added a brief comment. But then I went and removed the re-direct.
123:
Perhaps, but it remains that the article redirects to an article that doesn't explain what a noun particle is, in what way it differs from just any old particle, et cetera. Stubs attract writers, redirects don't. But if you are knowledgable in this field, why don't you write something about it? Then
112:
I noticed your change to the redirect I set the other day. However, noun particles aren't indigenous to
Japanese, as far as I know. Suggesting as much doesn't make sense, and I felt that redirecting to general information about particles (which did, in fact, mention noun particles and explain what
456:
I've never actively collaborated on a WikiProject before, so I don't know all the formalities and procedures to get that done, but I think my recent work on the 2008 MLS season, Major League Soccer, US Open Cup, and USMNT articles would indicate my full support. If you lead the way I would be more
530:
was to transition all
American and Canadian soccer articles to Away-Home and W-L-T format. MLS uses that format, and that's fine, I can accept that reasoning. By the same logic MLS has made the Supporters' Shield a major trophy that is determined solely by MLS play. As that is the case I see no
248:
All the material on this page is original research. I could go through and take out all the OR and be left with about four words. Instead of wasting my time doing that, I'll simply revert it to the dictionary entry since there is no verifiable information in the
Knowledge (XXG) entry. If you would
189:
I am not interested in engaging in any sort of edit-war over such a trivial matter, so I am not going to undo your revert. But I would encourage you to look into the matter further, and perhaps seek the opinions of other editors. I believe you'll find that they'll confirm my original hypothesis:
330:
I was dealing with someone undoing my edits on the teams table under the map. I got confused cause there were a bunch of edits all in a row, dealing with templates, etc. So anyway, long story short, nice job fixing what you fixed, and sorry I yelled at you, I was simply trying to fix something
311:. Which two of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia are no longer states? --
539:
article has both the
Premiers (like their Supporters' Shield winners) and the Champions (like the MLS Cup winner). There is no reason the same can't be done in the MLS article. It should be in the infobox and the article, and I want you to explain to me why you don't agree with that. --
173:
Dictionaries are are descriptive volumes by definition, nonetheless, not every word found in a dictionary is appropriate for an encyclopedia. Good dictionaries contain obscene language as well as non-standard but popular neologisms, but neither should be included in an encyclopedia. See
484:
Thanks for thinking of me in connection with this but truth be told, lately I can barely manage to find the time to compose testy critical comments! Good luck with it though and if it does get underway I'll be happy to keep an eye on it and contribute the stray observation.
815:
881:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
700:
688:
276:
502:
If the
Supporters' Shield is in the infobox, I don't see why it can't be in the article the way it is. Explain to me on my talk page, why exactly you don't think it should be in the article. --
169:
While I appreciate your tendency to balk at people who discourage descriptivism in language (although I might balk at the idea, rather than the person), I encourage you to consider the following:
809:
113:
a particle is) would be best until someone did have insight on how best to explain noun particles across all languages that have them. Anyways, that was just to let you know of my thinking.
232:
Yeah, I'm always hesitant to revert that much, but in this case I don't think there was any other choice. Thanks for adding the citation, though; I never would have caught it otherwise.
90:. I read and take each person's comments very seriously, whether or not the content is critical or praiseworthy. I look forward to working with you in future Knowledge (XXG) projects.
261:, it might provide some help on what to do with original research. In the meantime, please stop restoring original research to this page because it is unusable in this form.
207:
200:
703:
and I implore you to please add your opinions on the matter there, I will be researching the issue also but your help in the matter is greatly appreciated. Thankyou.
181:
While
Merriam-Webster defines the word without any further notes, www.dictionary.com defines 'underwhelm' and points out that it's usage is informal, refer again to
85:
743:
830:
154:
Thanks, to be honest I've forgotten about the redirect/article! I'll help work on it, for sure. I just have to find the time. Much appreciated! --
24:
Hi, can you put some more info on the USASA on the US soccer pyramid page and on the USASA page? like how exactly it fits into the pyramid? Thanks --
797:
531:
reason why it can't be in the article, infobox, or anywhere else because MLS endorses it. You seem to think that everyone who disagrees with you "
906:
527:
791:
670:
593:
570:
547:
509:
464:
439:
389:
338:
778:
787:
663:
I like what I see. So are you proposing basically a beefing up of the US/Canada task force into a full blown WikiProject? --
902:
648:
837:
194:
760:
893:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
898:
287:
623:
803:
190:'underwhelm' is creative, but non-standard English that has it's place in our language, but not our encyclopedia.
418:
768:
630:
360:
266:
750:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
675:
598:
575:
552:
514:
469:
444:
410:
394:
343:
634:
414:
283:
894:
619:
I've created a draft new infobox for football clubs incorporating the features present in the MLS box at
262:
211:
124:
the redirect won't harm and no stupid stub is needed. And thanks for your explanation. Cordially yours,
755:
368:
305:
298:
870:
861:
751:
823:
696:
643:
486:
316:
191:
890:
874:
145:
712:
699:
in hope to help all editors involved to solve your dispute. This discussion will be taking place
665:
588:
565:
542:
504:
490:
459:
434:
384:
333:
382:
Thanks for the message and your efforts. Please see the MLS talk page to see my comments. --
758:. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
851:
155:
114:
35:
886:
878:
258:
182:
175:
563:
You still haven't given me a reason why it shouldn't be in the infobox or the article. --
222:
889:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
882:
747:
735:
254:
364:
141:
250:
79:
638:
312:
706:
233:
125:
106:
48:
25:
695:
Hello, I am
Atyndall and I have taken on a mediation cabal case you filed regarding
847:
97:
65:
764:
article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the
78:
Thank you for your participation in providing me with a critique in my recent
910:
855:
719:
681:
653:
604:
581:
558:
520:
494:
475:
450:
422:
400:
372:
349:
320:
291:
270:
236:
158:
148:
128:
117:
51:
38:
28:
536:
215:
730:
877:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
526:
You obviously missed something because the result of the discussion on
277:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of pigs over 1000 pounds
242:
164:
331:
else, and you (for lack of a better word) got in the way. --
734:
Hello Roehl Sybing! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
432:
I think we finally found something we can agree on. :) --
210:, where I've replied to the thread where we were discussing
64:
34:
Worked on the USASA page a bit today. Hope it's useful. --
144:
but hope to work on it more soon. If you have time, よろしく。
309:
822:
201:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
836:
633:for how it displays). Please give your thoughts on
165:'Underwhelm' indeed found in Merriam-Webster Online
742:of the articles that you created is tagged as an
869:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
355:A Minor Issue: Conference Info in the MLS Infobox
282:I've proposed a solution you might agree with.
533:caries their bias against MLS into the article
413:- he's so bored. He has cancealled your edits
361:A Minor Issue: Conference Info in the Infobox
8:
586:Again, your reason for that belief is? --
744:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person
754:, all biographies should be based on
7:
528:talk:2008 Major League Soccer season
779:Allen Hopkins (soccer commentator)
14:
895:review the candidates' statements
140:I wrote a quick, 1-line intro of
729:
901:. For the Election committee,
871:Arbitration Committee election
862:ArbCom elections are now open!
237:12:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
199:
1:
911:13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
748:biographies of living persons
59:
52:22:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
39:20:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
29:16:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
856:00:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
359:Hello! Hope for a reply. :)
321:13:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
292:08:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
897:and submit your choices on
271:18:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
223:19:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
135:Target language/Translation
926:
903:MediaWiki message delivery
774:tag. Here is the article:
682:13:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
654:08:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
495:10:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
476:02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
451:01:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
423:17:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
401:02:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
16:I'm Roehl. I like pizza.
631:User:Number 57/Toronto FC
373:01:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
350:05:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
159:04:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
149:08:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
118:05:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
47:Thanks! That's perfect --
720:10:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
605:15:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
582:15:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
559:14:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
521:22:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
195:09:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
129:19:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
615:Football club infoboxes
249:take some time to read
624:Infobox Football club2
69:
60:Editor's Review Thanks
875:Arbitration Committee
68:
306:Super Tuesday (2008)
299:Super Tuesday (2008)
879:arbitration process
697:Major League Soccer
891:arbitration policy
738:alerting you that
378:MLS winners colors
212:User:AGK/Sandbox/3
70:
842:
725:Unreferenced BLPs
717:
284:The Transhumanist
917:
841:
840:
826:
782:
773:
767:
756:reliable sources
733:
718:
715:
709:
705:
678:
673:
668:
651:
646:
641:
628:
622:
601:
596:
591:
578:
573:
568:
555:
550:
545:
517:
512:
507:
472:
467:
462:
447:
442:
437:
415:US - Jimmy Slade
397:
392:
387:
346:
341:
336:
220:
100:
96:
91:
88:
82:
925:
924:
920:
919:
918:
916:
915:
914:
899:the voting page
865:
783:
771:
769:unreferencedBLP
765:
727:
713:
707:
704:
693:
676:
671:
666:
661:
649:
644:
639:
626:
620:
617:
599:
594:
589:
576:
571:
566:
553:
548:
543:
515:
510:
505:
470:
465:
460:
445:
440:
435:
430:
408:
395:
390:
385:
380:
357:
344:
339:
334:
328:
308:has me puzzled
302:
280:
246:
230:
216:
204:
167:
142:Target language
137:
110:
103:
98:
94:
86:
81:editor's review
80:
71:
62:
22:
12:
11:
5:
923:
921:
868:
864:
859:
844:
843:
726:
723:
692:
689:mediation case
685:
660:
657:
616:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
500:
499:
498:
497:
479:
478:
429:
426:
407:
404:
379:
376:
356:
353:
327:
324:
301:
295:
279:
274:
263:Cumulus Clouds
245:
240:
229:
226:
203:
198:
192:Joshua Crowgey
187:
186:
179:
166:
163:
162:
161:
136:
133:
132:
131:
109:
104:
92:
77:
63:
61:
58:
57:
56:
55:
54:
42:
41:
21:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
922:
913:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
872:
863:
860:
858:
857:
853:
849:
839:
835:
832:
829:
825:
821:
817:
814:
811:
808:
805:
802:
799:
796:
793:
789:
786:
785:Find sources:
780:
777:
776:
775:
770:
763:
762:
757:
753:
752:verifiability
749:
745:
741:
737:
732:
724:
722:
721:
716:
710:
702:
698:
690:
686:
684:
683:
680:
679:
674:
669:
658:
656:
655:
652:
647:
642:
636:
632:
625:
614:
606:
603:
602:
597:
592:
585:
584:
583:
580:
579:
574:
569:
562:
561:
560:
557:
556:
551:
546:
538:
534:
529:
525:
524:
523:
522:
519:
518:
513:
508:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:
481:
480:
477:
474:
473:
468:
463:
455:
454:
453:
452:
449:
448:
443:
438:
427:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:Grant.Alpaugh
405:
403:
402:
399:
398:
393:
388:
377:
375:
374:
370:
366:
362:
354:
352:
351:
348:
347:
342:
337:
325:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
304:Your edit to
300:
297:Your edit to
296:
294:
293:
289:
285:
278:
275:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
244:
241:
239:
238:
235:
227:
225:
224:
221:
219:
213:
209:
202:
197:
196:
193:
184:
180:
177:
172:
171:
170:
160:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
147:
143:
134:
130:
127:
122:
121:
120:
119:
116:
108:
107:Noun particle
105:
102:
101:
89:
87:archived here
83:
75:
67:
53:
50:
46:
45:
44:
43:
40:
37:
33:
32:
31:
30:
27:
19:
17:
866:
845:
833:
827:
819:
812:
806:
800:
794:
784:
759:
739:
728:
694:
664:
662:
618:
587:
564:
541:
532:
503:
501:
458:
433:
431:
409:
406:Hey, wos up?
383:
381:
363:. Thanks. --
358:
332:
329:
303:
281:
247:
231:
217:
205:
188:
168:
156:Roehl Sybing
138:
115:Roehl Sybing
111:
93:
74:Roehl Sybing
73:
36:Roehl Sybing
23:
15:
810:free images
428:MLS Infobox
214::) Cheers,
206:Please see
887:topic bans
708:Atyndall93
637:. Cheers,
365:Blackbox77
883:site bans
846:Thanks!--
313:Kralizec!
659:Proposal
635:WT:FOOTY
537:A-League
487:JohnInDC
234:Cmprince
848:DASHBot
816:WP refs
804:scholar
677:Alpaugh
600:Alpaugh
577:Alpaugh
554:Alpaugh
516:Alpaugh
471:Alpaugh
446:Alpaugh
396:Alpaugh
345:Alpaugh
259:WP:CITE
218:Anthøny
183:WP:TONE
176:WP:TONE
146:DDD DDD
126:Shinobu
873:. The
788:Google
746:. The
640:пﮟოьεԻ
255:WP:SYN
99:Real96
831:JSTOR
792:books
687:Your
667:Grant
629:(see
590:Grant
567:Grant
544:Grant
506:Grant
461:Grant
436:Grant
386:Grant
335:Grant
251:WP:OR
228:Ernie
72:Dear
20:USASA
907:talk
852:talk
824:FENS
798:news
714:talk
701:here
491:talk
419:talk
369:talk
317:talk
288:talk
267:talk
257:and
243:W00t
208:here
867:Hi,
838:TWL
761:694
736:bot
326:Box
909:)
885:,
854:)
818:)
781:-
772:}}
766:{{
711:|
627:}}
621:{{
493:)
421:)
371:)
319:)
290:)
269:)
253:,
95:--
84:,
49:AW
26:AW
905:(
850:(
834:·
828:·
820:·
813:·
807:·
801:·
795:·
790:(
740:1
691:.
672:.
650:7
645:5
595:.
572:.
549:.
511:.
489:(
466:.
441:.
417:(
391:.
367:(
340:.
315:(
286:(
265:(
185:.
178:.
76:,
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
