155:
the references provided by the original poster(s) if you take the time to actually look them up and if you study the discussion section of this article you will see that this information was arrived at through consensus, in some cases, several years ago. My objection in our disagreement has to do with your editing practices, that despite the fact that the material does contain referenced footnotes for the bulk of the section, you choose to simply delete the entire section instead of challenging it in a manner keeping with
Knowledge (XXG) policy. I am willing to discuss any of this in a reasonable fashion on the appropriate discussion page, but I am not willing to simply standby and watch referenced materials deleted from an article simply because a given editor appears to disagree with it for personal reasons. I have requested the opinion of an administrator in this regard and I'm quite happy to await another opinion. Thank you
71:
that the subjects contained in the section have already been discussed and arrived at through consensus in the past. If there are objections to claims in this section, I would like to ask him to discuss his issues with the material here on the talk page before removing a relatively large part of the material contained in the article, providing counter references would be a good start. This Prime
Minister was a fairly controversial figure in Canadian history,many of the facts of his life may appear startling to some at first glance, but dismissing negative allegations concerning him as "slander" without knowing the historical background supporting them is shaky ground to say the least. I'm hoping for support from other editors in this regard. I will attempt to provide other references for this section later in the week.
451:
396:
246:
527:
110:
610:
It is relevant because the architects acknowledged that they were inspired by Roman amphitheatres, and the most famous Roman amphitheatre happens to be the
Colosseum. So quoting people making the connection between the Tower of Babel as painted by Brueghel, the Colosseum and the Louise Weiss building
169:
I agree with your motives and good sense at
William Lyon Mackenzie King, but question your method. Removing it once was bold, but continuing was probably going too far (not that I haven't myself). All that being said, if you need support in the future on a similar issue, you likely find me there to
70:
article that was removed by editor RucasHost. RucasHost appears to be unwilling to engage in discussion regarding this matter here on the articles "talk" page, despite the large amount of referenced material he is choosing to delete, the fact that most of the material is referenced, and considering
226:
More specifically, please refrain from using as reference the wild accusations of a conspiracy theory for the claim that a minority of transhumanists have merged their transhumanist beliefs with
Satanism(!). You would need to use as reference the writings of a prominent transhumanist thinker or an
154:
Please be aware that I was not personally involved in posting any of the material that appears in the section that you continue to delete, apart from placing the qualifier "alleged" in the title of the section itself. The allegations of "racism" applied to
Mackenzie King *are* in fact supported by
298:
first, to understand the difference between (unqualified) MRCA and mt-MRCA (mitochondrial MRCA). As for your removal of the citation-needed template: I hate the citation myself, but it must remain there until the location issue is sorted out. Notice that I rewrote most the article and added
98:
continues to insist that the entire section is "unreferenced" and constitutes, in his words, "slander". This editor appears unwilling to discuss this issue on the talk page for the article itself or proceed in a reasonable manner, such as placing citation requests for the specific material he
505:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.
473:. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
261:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
31:
Please refrain from removing entire lengthy sections of articles, that actually contain references, without at least discussing your proposed actions first, like you did in the case of the article on
Canadian Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie
595:
My intention wasn't to vandalize. It's just that the information is rather irrelevant. It would make more sense to have that on article about the painting, rather than an article about a building which is allegedly based on the painting.
84:
article) Once again reverted deletion of an entire referenced section of this article by editor RucasHost, who despite the fact that most of the section is specifically referenced with footnotes leading to reputably published
662:
article in which you removed the protection tag and restored material under discussion on the talk page: I've reverted the edit and would encourage you to participate in the discussion. I must add that
179:
Cool it! Deleting the section right now is not going to work. But if citaitons aren't provided to replace the fact tags, this can all be removed. Discuss now rather than delete. You have support. --
667:'s placement of the protection tag in no way meets Knowledge (XXG)'s definition of vandalism - nor, for that matter, does the removal of the material under discussion (whether by myself or others).
99:
disputes in the body of the article. I will place a second stage vandalism warning on this editors "user" page and continue to hope that he will proceed in a more reasonable fashion.
223:; and 2) take the time to click on and read the references (linked to by a number) at the end of the sentences you believed to be unsourced before questioning their factuality.
227:
academic critic of transhumanism who explicitly argues that a minority of transhumanists have merged their transhumanist beliefs with some particular religious belief system.
303:, so I hate the citation template as much as you. I just haven't had time to look into the issue. Removing the citation template does not help the article become better.
635:
Sorry! I misread your title change — I read "opposing" as an adjective, when you meant it as a verb. We might need to consider that it's confusing, in that case... --
569:
578:
could be considered vandalism. There may be facts that do not please you (same for me and everybody else) but removing them like this is no solution. Cheers,
133:
LOL. You're the one who is adding unreferenced controversial information, accusing him of being a "racist". Please see my message on the discussion page. --
44:
2 unrelated references for a huge section alleging an important political figure was a racist? Neither of the sources supporting the bizzarre allegation...
95:^ Sunahara, Ann Gomer. The Politics of Racism: The Uprooting of Japanese Canadians During the Second World War, (Toronto: Lorimer, 1981) pg. 23.
326:
Cool. Thanks for trying anyway. I am sure it was well-intentioned. Remind me to look into this issue again in a few weeks, if I forget :)
92:^ Ferguson, Will. Bastards and Boneheads: Canada's Glorious Leaders Past and Present, (Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre, 1999) pg. 168.
470:
547:
357:
There is nothing wrong with adding a well referenced statement from the BBC to the appropriate section of the 9/11 article. --
89:^ Knowles, Valerie. Strangers at Our Gates: Canadian Immigration and Immigration Policy, 1540-1997, (Toronto: Dundurn, 1997)
270:
from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
263:
258:
535:
466:
366:
There is when it has been repeatedly and consistently refuted. Or does your perception of time stop in mid-September? --
539:
267:
295:
254:
147:
114:
81:
67:
66:(copied from discussion page of Mackenzie King article) I've once again replaced an entire referenced section of the
551:
53:
Knowledge (XXG) isn't a dumping ground for dirt you have on former politicians. Things have to be verified. --
400:
672:
546:
for any tests. For more information about the do's and dont's of creating articles, you may want to read
271:
250:
543:
601:
497:
430:
348:
156:
122:
100:
72:
33:
17:
465:, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a
213:
209:
204:
476:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
668:
612:
579:
559:
531:
511:
491:
458:
444:
287:
180:
171:
404:
462:
640:
481:
231:
461:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
597:
426:
376:
358:
314:
134:
118:
54:
450:
395:
245:
616:
583:
495:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
416:
327:
304:
198:
676:
644:
620:
605:
587:
563:
515:
434:
420:
379:
370:
361:
351:
330:
317:
307:
280:
234:
183:
174:
159:
137:
125:
103:
75:
57:
36:
659:
555:
507:
664:
367:
636:
294:
Please refrain from changing the article again. You may want to read up on
275:
202:
article again, you should 1) be aware of the suggested guidelines on the
526:
109:
425:
Hey, I just wanted to say I love how you have contributed. Thanks!
344:
343:
Please refrain from adding conspiracy theory information to the
117:. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
501:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
449:
530:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). A page you recently created,
375:
Can you provide any reliable sources to back this up? --
655:
575:
412:
399:
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as
300:
534:, may not conform to some of Knowledge (XXG)'s
463:section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion
570:Seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg
554:to learn more about contributing. Thank you.
8:
542:(if it hasn't been already). Please use the
403:for inappropriate discussion, as described
253:according to the reverts you have made on
249:You currently appear to be engaged in an
611:is, really, not so illogical. Cheers,
538:for new pages, so it will shortly be
230:Thanking you for your cooperation. --
7:
210:claims for and against transhumanism
27:William Lyon Mackenzie King Article
113:Please do not delete content from
24:
170:help you. Just give a shout. --
80:(copied from discussion page for
550:. You may also want to read our
525:
394:
244:
108:
313:Alright, thanks for the tip. --
266:. If you continue, you may be
1:
677:18:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
645:08:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
621:20:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
606:18:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
588:17:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
564:15:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
516:14:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
435:04:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
631:Opposing conspriacy theories
421:00:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
380:02:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
371:02:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
362:00:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
352:21:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
331:03:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
318:01:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
308:00:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
299:extensive inline references
281:03:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
235:20:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
184:23:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
175:22:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
160:03:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
138:03:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
126:03:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
104:03:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
76:00:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
58:17:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
37:18:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
296:Most recent common ancestor
255:William Lyon Mackenzie King
148:William Lyon Mackenzie King
115:William Lyon Mackenzie King
82:William Lyon MacKenzie King
68:William Lyon Mackenzie King
692:
146:(copied from talk page of
457:A tag has been placed on
286:Your repeated changes to
576:This unjustified erasure
498:the article's talk page
401:Talk:Planned Parenthood
654:RucasHost, concerning
650:David Suzuki vandalism
454:
471:articles for deletion
453:
443:Speedy deletion of
196:Before editing the
18:User talk:RucasHost
548:Your first article
455:
205:Talk:Transhumanism
552:introduction page
288:Mitochondrial Eve
264:three-revert rule
259:three-revert rule
683:
529:
487:
486:
480:
398:
274:among editors.
257:. Note that the
248:
112:
691:
690:
686:
685:
684:
682:
681:
680:
652:
633:
573:
523:
484:
478:
477:
467:deletion debate
448:
392:
390:Talk page abuse
341:
292:
242:
208:page regarding
191:
167:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
689:
687:
651:
648:
632:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
572:
567:
522:
519:
447:
441:
439:
391:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
340:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
321:
320:
291:
284:
241:
238:
215:external links
190:
187:
166:
163:
157:Deconstructhis
152:
151:
143:
142:
141:
140:
123:Deconstructhis
101:Deconstructhis
87:
86:
78:
73:Deconstructhis
63:
62:
61:
60:
48:
47:
46:
45:
34:Deconstructhis
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
688:
679:
678:
674:
670:
666:
661:
657:
649:
647:
646:
642:
638:
630:
622:
618:
614:
609:
608:
607:
603:
599:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
577:
571:
568:
566:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
528:
521:December 2007
520:
518:
517:
513:
509:
504:
500:
499:
494:
493:
483:
474:
472:
469:, such as at
468:
464:
460:
452:
446:
442:
440:
437:
436:
432:
428:
423:
422:
419:
418:
413:
410:
407:, you may be
406:
402:
397:
389:
381:
378:
374:
373:
372:
369:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
350:
346:
338:
332:
329:
325:
324:
323:
322:
319:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
306:
302:
297:
289:
285:
283:
282:
279:
278:
273:
269:
265:
260:
256:
252:
247:
239:
237:
236:
233:
228:
224:
222:
220:
216:
211:
207:
206:
201:
200:
199:Transhumanism
194:
189:Transhumanism
188:
186:
185:
182:
177:
176:
173:
164:
162:
161:
158:
149:
145:
144:
139:
136:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
120:
116:
111:
106:
105:
102:
96:
93:
90:
83:
79:
77:
74:
69:
65:
64:
59:
56:
52:
51:
50:
49:
43:
42:
41:
40:
39:
38:
35:
26:
19:
669:Victoriagirl
660:David Suzuki
653:
634:
574:
524:
502:
496:
489:
475:
456:
438:
424:
415:
408:
393:
342:
293:
276:
243:
240:October 2007
229:
225:
218:
214:
203:
197:
195:
192:
181:Kevin Murray
178:
172:Kevin Murray
168:
153:
107:
97:
94:
91:
88:
30:
492:the article
490:the top of
193:RucasHost,
121:.Thank you.
536:guidelines
232:Loremaster
598:RucasHost
427:Karonaway
377:RucasHost
359:RucasHost
347:article.
315:RucasHost
272:consensus
135:RucasHost
55:RucasHost
656:the edit
532:KKKramer
459:KKKramer
445:KKKramer
417:MastCell
349:Timneu22
328:Fred Hsu
305:Fred Hsu
290:is wrong
251:edit war
221:sections
219:see also
150:article)
119:reverted
85:sources:
658:to the
556:Brianga
544:sandbox
540:removed
508:meshach
409:blocked
268:blocked
665:Kurykh
503:speedy
482:hangon
368:Golbez
637:Haemo
165:Agree
32:King.
16:<
673:talk
641:talk
617:talk
602:talk
584:talk
560:talk
512:talk
431:talk
405:here
345:9/11
339:9/11
301:here
217:and
613:RCS
580:RCS
488:to
411:.
277:nat
212:or
675:)
643:)
619:)
604:)
596:--
586:)
562:)
514:)
485:}}
479:{{
433:)
414:.
671:(
639:(
615:(
600:(
582:(
558:(
510:(
429:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
