342:. However, this still vote-stacks in favor of the proposal by regulars at that page, and the entire point of our P&G pages is that they are site-wide consensus not a local consensus, so there really is no up-side to hosting the proposal discussion at the material's own talk page. I don't feel that way about change discussions (rewriting a section, deleting a passage, adding a new line-item, etc.); VPPOL should not drown in comparatively minor change proposals. However, any such change discussion that is likely to affect a large number of articles should be the subject of a pointer notice at VPPOL. PS: I think I was mixing up VPPOL and VPPRO, if that's what you're getting at; VPPRO seems more for non-policy proposals (and non-technical ones, since VPTECH exists for those).
338:. The instructions of VPPOL and in that paragraph at WP:POL can't both be correct (at least not without clarification that either option is viable, or whatever). Statistically speaking, we know from long experience that hosting a guideline proposal at the talk page of the material attracts very little input but from the page's extant regulars and does not produce a very solid consensus, but rather a local one that is apt to be challenged later (or the alleged guideline widely ignored and eventually demoted again), while using VPPOL attracts a more diverse and larger set of editors and produces a stronger consensus. This effect can sometimes be somewhat approximated by "advertising" the proposal, if hosted at the material's own talk page, via VPPOL and
31:
1156:
487:, there is a grognard template with a little red book. I was looking online about little red book and found out that it is related to Mao and communist China. Given that many people are not fans of Mao nor communism, I was wondering if you could add a template option, say for example, The Green Book of Knowledge (XXG), in honor of environmentalism, without references to political or economic systems. --
1167:
1088:
1026:
964:
916:
858:
796:
731:
674:
619:
554:
202:
exists for this very purpose, when it comes to guideline/policy proposals, though an alternative is (as I said, and as I did) posting notice there rather than hosting the discussion there. If you think I'm going to stop posting policy/guideline proposal notices to VPPRO, and policy/guideline wording
381:
There is no reason to reach for an interpretation that RfC discussions are somehow not "discussions" to have at VPPOL (which in fact hosts many policy/guideline RfCs) when we know we get better results hosting the RfC discussions there. I'll just have to agree to disagree with you about turnout; I
363:
WP:VPPOL and WP:POL don't conflict if you interpret VPPOL as being for "discussing" a page but not for "holding the actual promotion RFC" (i.e., anything except the official RFC can happen at VPPOL, including discussions about whether to have that RFC, what it should say, whether it's started, how
119:
says about the location of guideline promotion discussions just this month. I'm almost tempted to propose a change the long-standing wording in that policy from "start an RfC for your policy or guideline proposal in a new section on the talk page" to "start an RfC for your policy or guideline
246:
Note that my problem is with you telling people that if they want to a page to be tagged as a guideline or policy, then they need to have the RFC discussion itself at VPPR. I've got no problems with you pointing any/all relevant pages to such a discussion; the problem is with you saying "The
382:
spend an unusual amount of time in policy discussions compared to other
Wikipedians and trust my own judgment on this. Also, the entire WP:PROPOSAL section you're relying on begins with "One path for proposals is ...", so it is not exclusive or dispositive to begin with, only an example.
516:
style. And environmentalism is just as much as socio-political viewpoint as communism (albeit on a different political axis), so your rationale isn't a neutrality improvement. I don't care if it gets changed, but I'm disinclined to make such a change myself.
203:
or interpretation change discussion notices to VPPOL, where they belong, and suggesting ā when I think it's in the project's best actual interests ā that a particular proposal would be better hosted directly at
Village Pump, then you are entirely mistaken.
420:. I don't happen to remember seeing your name in any of them, but perhaps I just missed it. Even the least attended (a quite specialized subject) already has comments from eight editors, and some have dozens of editors commenting.
191:
One may also argue that this needs a broader discussion/forum than this particular one; frankly I am surprised that relatively few people commented, but the lack of popularity of these pages was hinted at elsewhere on the talk
367:
WP:POL lists a lot of options for advertising those RFCs, beginning with both VPPOL "and/or" VPPRO. We are not having problems getting people to show up for RFCs about policy changes these days.
438:
when I'm pretty obviously on a near-total wikibreak and barely checking in, versus 15+ years of my history here, is indicative of nothing other than this conversation has no productive purpose.
808:
779:
409:
818:
881:
690:
635:
315:
policy says the correct procedure is to "start an RfC for your policy or guideline proposal in a new section on the talk page" (i.e., not at any of the village pumps).
198:
discussions that have potential site-wide impact, instead of continuing to sideline them on talk pages only 10 people read and without any further "advertising".
1201:
1038:
976:
932:
928:
823:
873:
658:
603:
290:
312:
297:
528:
449:
393:
353:
276:
214:
168:
97:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
413:
405:
686:
512:. I don't personally have much interest in the specifics of those templates, and people have been prone to fight about them,
1081:
1019:
957:
909:
851:
789:
724:
667:
612:
547:
417:
1217:
566:
813:
812:
has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
831:
38:
631:
305:
1155:
335:
154:
933:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject
Linguistics Ā§Ā RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?
425:
372:
325:
252:
237:
129:
827:
816:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
809:
Category:Organizations with roster consultative status to the United
Nations Economic and Social Council
780:
Category:Organizations with roster consultative status to the United
Nations Economic and Social Council
638:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --
525:
446:
390:
350:
273:
211:
165:
47:
17:
513:
225:
116:
869:
842:
693:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
122:
and definitely not on any of the
Village pumps or any other page, no matter what SMcCandlish tells you
1100:
508:
492:
147:
1113:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
1051:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
989:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
756:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
579:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
877:
232:
be declared an official
Knowledge (XXG) guideline. Did they? Or is that an irrelevant example?
199:
140:
743:
421:
368:
321:
261:
You're just repeating yourself, without taking into account any of the above. I won't repeat
248:
233:
180:
125:
339:
1126:
1064:
1002:
940:
892:
769:
707:
643:
592:
520:
441:
385:
345:
268:
206:
160:
1114:
1110:
1052:
1048:
990:
986:
757:
753:
580:
576:
1221:
1130:
1068:
1006:
944:
896:
835:
773:
711:
651:
596:
533:
496:
454:
429:
398:
376:
358:
329:
281:
256:
241:
229:
219:
173:
133:
691:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#Template:R from related concept
1122:
1060:
998:
765:
588:
488:
186:
143:, then either that wording needs to change, or VPPRO needs to be MfD'ed for closure as
927:
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited
636:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 10#Template:Other uses-section
247:
discussion really belongs here" when the discussion is already in the correct place.
124:". Please try to remember this time so I don't have to go to that much work, 'kay?
936:
888:
697:
639:
289:
You believe proposals to tag something as a guideline should ideally be made at
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
484:
139:
If that page's wording has come to conflict with the existence and purpose of
404:
Do you think you do? There are four "policy" RFCs open at the moment:
1109:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
1047:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
985:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
752:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
575:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
540:
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
1166:
194:" This is not a new problem, and its entire and obvious solution is
1012:
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
717:
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
483:
Hey man. I was looking at the service awards and noticed that for
950:
Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
25:
1165:
931:
in the past year that there is a new request for comment at
570:
on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment
502:
Lots of books have red covers. There's a difference between
1042:
on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment
747:
on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment
308:
is used to discuss proposed policies and guidelines..."
685:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
630:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
115:
I believe this is the second time I've told you what
980:
on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment
880:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1074:Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
1220:on behalf of The Knowledge (XXG) Library team --
1175:
1152:
334:More or less. This is why I observe there's a
293:(with a note on the affected page's talk page).
1040:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject United States
8:
978:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Linguistics
929:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Linguistics
657:"Template:R from related concept" listed at
120:proposal in a new section on the talk page
1140:
479:Addition of service award template request
602:"Template:Other uses-section" listed at
291:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (proposals)
313:Knowledge (XXG):Policies and guidelines
1121:Message delivered to you with love by
1104:on a "Biographies" request for comment
1059:Message delivered to you with love by
997:Message delivered to you with love by
764:Message delivered to you with love by
587:Message delivered to you with love by
190:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
434:Dwelling on my lack of participation
298:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)
7:
1189:Library design improvements continue
885:on the Templates for discussion page
782:has been nominated for listification
286:Do we agree on the following facts?
185:See also salient part of 2015 close
401:; rev'd. 04:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
224:I hope that nobody actually made a
1151:
189:(second half of last paragraph): "
24:
1154:
1086:
1079:
1024:
1017:
962:
955:
914:
907:
856:
849:
794:
787:
729:
722:
672:
665:
617:
610:
552:
545:
29:
1099:Your feedback is requested at
1037:Your feedback is requested at
975:Your feedback is requested at
742:Your feedback is requested at
689:. The discussion will occur at
687:Template:R from related concept
634:. The discussion will occur at
565:Your feedback is requested at
157:, and not an error on my part.
1:
1080:
1018:
956:
908:
850:
788:
723:
666:
611:
546:
518:
439:
383:
343:
266:
204:
158:
1136:Books & Bytes ā Issue 45
1125::) | Is this wrong? Contact
1106:. Thank you for helping out!
1063::) | Is this wrong? Contact
1044:. Thank you for helping out!
1001::) | Is this wrong? Contact
982:. Thank you for helping out!
768::) | Is this wrong? Contact
749:. Thank you for helping out!
591::) | Is this wrong? Contact
572:. Thank you for helping out!
568:Talk:The Wall Street Journal
1160:The Knowledge (XXG) Library
632:Template:Other uses-section
1238:
1218:MediaWiki message delivery
1183:Issue 45, May ā June 2021
1077:
1015:
953:
905:
847:
785:
720:
663:
608:
543:
1222:11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
1131:18:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
1069:21:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
1007:11:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
945:10:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
897:07:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
841:Nomination for merger of
836:01:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
824:categories for discussion
774:16:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
712:20:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
652:16:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
497:16:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
455:14:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
430:04:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
399:03:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
377:03:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
359:03:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
330:16:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
282:11:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
257:20:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
242:20:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
220:06:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
134:20:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
1202:Read the full newsletter
1111:Feedback Request Service
1049:Feedback Request Service
987:Feedback Request Service
754:Feedback Request Service
659:Redirects for discussion
604:Redirects for discussion
597:20:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
577:Feedback Request Service
534:03:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
296:The very first words at
174:03:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
1170:
1169:
874:nominated for merging
506:little red book, and
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:SMcCandlish
883:the template's entry
819:the category's entry
1102:Talk:Ricky Schroder
509:The Little Red Book
111:Memory problemsĀ ;-)
1171:
1115:removing your name
1053:removing your name
991:removing your name
878:Template:GA inline
758:removing your name
581:removing your name
364:it's going, etc.).
1224:
1212:
1211:
1178:Books & Bytes
1118:
1056:
994:
826:page. Thank you.
761:
584:
485:Journeyman Editor
436:right this second
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1229:
1215:
1192:New partnerships
1181:
1158:
1145:Extended content
1141:
1108:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1083:
1082:
1046:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1021:
1020:
984:
970:
966:
965:
959:
958:
922:
918:
917:
911:
910:
870:Template:GA pass
864:
860:
859:
853:
852:
843:Template:GA pass
828:RevelationDirect
802:
798:
797:
791:
790:
751:
737:
733:
732:
726:
725:
710:
704:
701:
700:
680:
676:
675:
669:
668:
648:
625:
621:
620:
614:
613:
574:
560:
556:
555:
549:
548:
532:
453:
397:
357:
280:
218:
184:
172:
152:
146:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1237:
1236:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1213:
1208:
1207:
1205:
1195:1Lib1Ref update
1185:
1172:
1163:
1146:
1138:
1127:my bot operator
1097:
1096:
1095:
1087:
1085:
1076:
1065:my bot operator
1035:
1034:
1033:
1025:
1023:
1014:
1003:my bot operator
973:
972:
971:
963:
961:
952:
925:
924:
923:
915:
913:
904:
867:
866:
865:
857:
855:
846:
805:
804:
803:
795:
793:
784:
770:my bot operator
740:
739:
738:
730:
728:
719:
708:o toki tawa mi.
706:
702:
695:
694:
683:
682:
681:
673:
671:
662:
644:
628:
627:
626:
618:
616:
607:
593:my bot operator
563:
562:
561:
553:
551:
542:
481:
320:Is that right?
304:section of the
230:Template:Navbox
178:
150:
144:
113:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1235:
1233:
1210:
1209:
1199:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1173:
1164:
1148:
1147:
1144:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1107:
1084:
1078:
1075:
1072:
1045:
1022:
1016:
1013:
1010:
983:
960:
954:
951:
948:
912:
906:
903:
900:
854:
848:
845:
839:
814:categorization
792:
786:
783:
777:
750:
745:Talk:Jan Żaryn
727:
721:
718:
715:
670:
664:
661:
655:
646:
615:
609:
606:
600:
573:
550:
544:
541:
538:
537:
536:
505:
480:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
437:
365:
336:WP:PROCESSFORK
318:
317:
316:
309:
294:
264:
197:
176:
155:WP:PROCESSFORK
112:
109:
107:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1234:
1225:
1223:
1219:
1206:
1204:
1203:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1184:
1180:
1179:
1168:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1150:
1149:
1143:
1142:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1129:. | Sent at
1128:
1124:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1105:
1103:
1093:
1073:
1071:
1070:
1067:. | Sent at
1066:
1062:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1043:
1041:
1031:
1011:
1009:
1008:
1005:. | Sent at
1004:
1000:
995:
992:
988:
981:
979:
969:
949:
947:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
921:
901:
899:
898:
894:
890:
887:. Thank you.
886:
884:
879:
875:
871:
863:
844:
840:
838:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
820:
815:
811:
810:
801:
781:
778:
776:
775:
772:. | Sent at
771:
767:
762:
759:
755:
748:
746:
736:
716:
714:
713:
709:
699:
692:
688:
679:
660:
656:
654:
653:
649:
641:
637:
633:
624:
605:
601:
599:
598:
595:. | Sent at
594:
590:
585:
582:
578:
571:
569:
559:
539:
535:
530:
527:
524:
523:
515:
511:
510:
503:
501:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
486:
478:
456:
451:
448:
445:
444:
435:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
400:
395:
392:
389:
388:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
361:
360:
355:
352:
349:
348:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
288:
287:
285:
284:
283:
278:
275:
272:
271:
262:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
216:
213:
210:
209:
201:
195:
193:
188:
182:
177:
175:
170:
167:
164:
163:
156:
153:. This is a
149:
142:
138:
137:
136:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
110:
105:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1214:
1200:
1198:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1159:
1153:
1120:
1101:
1098:
1091:
1058:
1039:
1036:
1029:
996:
977:
974:
967:
926:
919:
882:
868:
861:
817:
807:
806:
799:
763:
744:
741:
734:
684:
677:
629:
622:
586:
567:
564:
557:
521:
507:
482:
442:
422:WhatamIdoing
386:
369:WhatamIdoing
346:
322:WhatamIdoing
306:village pump
301:
269:
249:WhatamIdoing
234:WhatamIdoing
207:
196:centralizing
181:WhatamIdoing
161:
126:WhatamIdoing
121:
114:
78:
43:
37:
522:SMcCandlish
514:WP:BIKESHED
443:SMcCandlish
387:SMcCandlish
347:SMcCandlish
270:SMcCandlish
226:WP:PROPOSAL
208:SMcCandlish
162:SMcCandlish
117:WP:PROPOSAL
98:ArchiveĀ 180
90:ArchiveĀ 178
85:ArchiveĀ 177
79:ArchiveĀ 176
73:ArchiveĀ 175
68:ArchiveĀ 174
60:ArchiveĀ 170
36:This is an
902:RfC notice
703:(she/they)
148:Historical
1123:Yapperbot
1061:Yapperbot
999:Yapperbot
872:has been
766:Yapperbot
589:Yapperbot
489:Thinker78
300:say "The
106:July 2021
1216:Sent by
200:WP:VPPRO
141:WP:VPPRO
822:on the
340:WP:CENT
39:archive
937:Nardog
889:Bsherr
698:Tamzin
640:Ahecht
302:policy
265:self.
876:with
228:that
192:page.
16:<
1092:Done
1030:Done
968:Done
941:talk
920:Done
893:talk
862:Done
832:talk
800:Done
735:Done
678:Done
647:PAGE
645:TALK
623:Done
558:Done
493:talk
426:talk
373:talk
326:talk
311:The
253:talk
238:talk
187:here
130:talk
696:--
531:š¼
452:š¼
396:š¼
356:š¼
279:š¼
217:š¼
171:š¼
943:)
935:.
895:)
834:)
705:|
650:)
519:ā
495:)
440:ā
428:)
416:,
412:,
408:,
384:ā
375:)
344:ā
328:)
267:ā
263:my
255:)
240:)
205:ā
159:ā
151:}}
145:{{
132:)
94:ā
64:ā
1117:.
1055:.
993:.
939:(
891:(
830:(
760:.
642:(
583:.
529:Ā¢
526:ā
504:a
491:(
450:Ā¢
447:ā
424:(
418:4
414:3
410:2
406:1
394:Ā¢
391:ā
371:(
354:Ā¢
351:ā
324:(
277:Ā¢
274:ā
251:(
236:(
215:Ā¢
212:ā
183::
179:@
169:Ā¢
166:ā
128:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.