User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 185

1125: 31: 1291: 891: 1185: 1407: 1345: 1230: 1081: 1019: 957: 836: 602: 325: 263: 201: 129: 146: 180: 501:

Argh, something is broken. Specifically the first value after each header (type, energy, and length) do not display, even if given a value. Turning off autoheaders (by blanking the value, not by changing y to n) does not seem to fix the problem. What have I missed? (Template has been added to the

803:

Thanks for all of this. I'm not even sure if 'gusan' is the most common spelling. I didn't even know the article existed because I was so used to the "gosan" spelling. It appears that in Persia it is referred to as 'gosan' but is 'gusan' in Armenia. Hmm... I will have to look further.

467:. Once you start rolling out, you'll probably get a few people who watchlist the accelerator pages to start adding in some functionality and other fields to the infobox. In some ways, just putting out a functional infobox into articles can be the best way of optimizing it. 433:(the diff itself fixed your coord issue) - I've moved the ib to the template space (I agree that it's pretty much good to go). As far as cats go, they should be added to the /doc (as it says in the commented-out note) - at the bottom you'll see a 542:

Fixed. There were conflicting numbers. You actually picked the best case for testing, since it was the most complex. Putting it on the template's /testcases page first would have been safer, but there was no harm done in this case. –

397:

So, assuming the general concept of a particle accelerator infobox makes sense, (it does to ME, but that may not be dispositive) I need to figure out how to do the following, and in what order:

377:

Hi! I'm trying to make an infobox, and the Wikiproject infobox doesn't seem terribly active. Looking through the list of members, you seemed a reasonable person to bug at random. Sorry. :)

1197: 464: 459:

Another talk page stalker adding my two cents - The example shows that it displays well and correctly, so looks pretty good. Some thoughts on infobox classification are

1157:, peace doves and icecream the composer looks better than when I wrote last. I wonder if you might be the right person to question the 2010 ban of infoboxes by 381: 401:

Add categories to the infobox, without accidentally adding something in my personal space to lists of categories before moving it into general space.

1207: 1116: 1193: 1177: 1419: 460: 275: 793: 726:

even though "Navajos" is also found in sources). This plurality does not generalize to other things, like occupations and the like (

576: 170: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 848: 969: 507: 1400: 1338: 1285: 1223: 1074: 1012: 950: 829: 595: 318: 256: 194: 1204: 337: 38: 1189: 150:

Happy April Fool's Day! Thanks for your contributions to improve the dissemination of free knowledge to humanity!

775: 662:). I don't know that this would even be controversial, so perhaps a formal RM isn't necessary? Not sure. Best – 510:

pages. Maybe I shouldn't have gone straight for the biggest one in the world, but I already had the example.)

391: 1302: 430: 1201: 1166: 1145: 1031: 779: 714:); and in such a case we prefer the singular form when it is also more commonly used as the plural than a 437: 404:

Add coordinates to the examples and the template, without causing the same problem. (cough, again, cough)

790: 767: 573: 503: 153: 47: 17: 759: 685: 387: 1200:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

907: 524:

Someone fixed it. Even though the example page has "header1" as well as "label1" and "data1", when

1137: 1124: 548: 213: 1432: