User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 121

820:

personally scapegoated at WT:FAC; everyone can be a hypocrite when they get emotional, I guess!). I hope my more recent post was more constructive. Anyway, my principal concern is that the same crusader at FAC who proposed an "anti-MoS" there and who is presently trying to undermine key wording in MoS's lead, has a bit of a fan club at FAC (when FAC isn't mad at her CITE clique; none of these "alliances" are 100%, 24/7, just overlapping most of the time). What I predict is that FAC "buddies" will be rounded up to bloc-vote by people like this on particular pet peeves, while the rest ofthe RfCs major discussions at MoS will go unmentioned at FAC, leading to precisely the canvassing pattern I warned of. I would bet money on it. Hopefully I'll be pleasantly surprised.

2264: 2100: 2062: 486: 2652: 2055: 2048: 988: 218: 2825:

and non-content-visible changes to citations, a result I'm certain will not be sustained if anyone ever bothers to take the matter to ArbCom). Pretty much the last thing on earth that WP needs is further spread of this claim-staking behavior or weakening of guidelines that curtail it. I'm not really certain what to do about it, since ArbCom doesn't adjudicate content disputes, including content of non-mainspace pages, and the largely moribund

31: 753:), have said unpleasant things about all the MoS regulars as a group (and sometimes me in particular, and sometimes the AT regulars, when they're not part of the extended faction that happens to be venting). It's a bunch of political, territorial chest-beating. I trust that it won't really amount to much in the long run, because the overall stability and utility of the project is more important than the "don't touch muh article/topic" 236: 1305: 710:; based on what you've posted I'm pretty sure you'll think I shouldn't be doing this, so I wanted to make sure it was out in the open for discussion if you wish. Perhaps I should add, since you've said in the past that I've said unpleasant things about you, that I have not, and don't intend to. I believe you have the best interests of the encyclopedia at heart, as do I. We just appear to disagree about how to proceed. 2659: 2428: 591: 762:, and I'll leave for a long stretch again if they get too irritating, and wikilife will go on without me. I could have written a dozen more books in the time I've spent on this project, and have a tech blog to get going, so it's not like I don't have other things I can be doing. Drama-mongering from that quarter has a lot to do with why my participation here has dropped recently to about 10% of normal. 2070: 3260: 870:

two-pronged anti-MoS proposal laced with constant scapegoating of all MoS regulars in general and me in particular, even though half the time they were talking about infoboxes which a) MoS has no position on and b) I have no firm position on. These are clear indicators of irrational, territorial group-think. Not a permanent or unfixable condition, but hardly imaginary when it happened.

2769:

have a lot of respect for almost everyone in the discussion, but it's honestly difficult to see how articles being brought into line can be equated with being bossed around. Unless, of course, there's a hypersensitivity to one's edits being further edited, which might be in the neighbourhood of the heart of the matter. Anyhow, I've got more drinking to do. Merry Christmas Buddy!

2213: 2523: 2450: 1432:

to interpret and apply the existing rules, not how to defy them; even if they are not what you personally prefer. No one agrees with every single line-item in MoS or any other guideline, nor does any line-item have unanimous agreement. While some editors (like two of us right here, obviously) would oppose the inclusion of a "capitalize traintracks" rule as

2168: 385: 3215: 2918: 2382: 2321: 1592: 1515: 1253: 1199: 974: 923: 671: 474: 174: 127: 1754:

editors idiots and vowing to battleground, especially in an area under discretionary sanctions, is not permissible. So I cannot see anything productive coming from an attempt at third-party defensiveness of these behaviors, especially just on the grounds that the template didn't initially produce the useful output that was expected.

847:

or another of an issue, why would that necessarily be a problem? If that does happen, the most natural explanation would be that the kind of editor that works at FAC is more likely to see things a certain way. When you say things like "FAC buddies" and "FAC clique" you're referring to something that I don't think exists.

3058:

PS: Given that you've only responded emotively not substantively, here or there, I consider the matter closed. I did notice a change in your approach at WT:MOS, the locus of the dispute, which appears to be in response to the issues I (among others) raised with what you posted there there other day,

3032:

I've also spelled out that the words I use have clear meanings and are not "insults". I'm not responsible for your emotions or your penchant for searching for ways to find offense in everything. Yes, I have a critical opinion about some of your behaviors, and no one likes receiving criticism. It is

2857:

I followed that FAC thing and I couldn't believe how angry the one side seemed and, when faced with logical rebuttals, got even angrier. It's something I'd expect at, say, a pro wrestler's article, where the contributors might not be up on all the finer details, but these are people vetting main page

1874:

calling others idiots, but rather that you're leaping in to defend someone else doing so but don't have any rationale for this other than "your template was broken". You not knowing what I was actually referring to suggests that you did not look into the background of the matter, either, but are just

1748:

ArbCom case when given a parameter value referring to that case. I'll take a look at the source. Redrose64, I would like to know why you are taking an interest in this. You're surely aware that anyone is permitted to revert the addition of template notices at their own talk page, and that doing so

1459:

against every single MoS-compliance move request, as if they're saving babies from cannibal barbarians, especially after a stack of RM precedent has already been established to follow MOSCAPS as usual on these matters. The goal is to have a consistent nomenclature system for our readers and editors,

846:

I think you're misinterpreting what you see. In many cases I don't think there will be anything like unanimity on MoS issues from editors likely to see a note at WT:FAC, but if it should turn out that most or all editors who come to a MoS discussion via a note posted at WT:FAC all agree on one side

3156:

You are distracting me from delicate template coding with this "last word" bickering. If you want to continue this conversation, which seems evident despite your protestations to the contrary, do so at your own talk page and don't ping me, please. I'll check it when I'm idle. (And hopefully find it

2824:

component. (CITEVAR allows people to make up, out of their own heads, fake citation "styles" and defend them against attempts to normalize them to something anyone would recognize, and is also frequently interpreted as enabling editwarring against citation templates, and even against any code-level

2768:

I appreciate the message. I agree that it would be nigh-impossible to get the genie back in the bottle, but I'm actually optimistic, based on the supporters of a comprehensive style guide. Most of the "cooler heads" seem to appreciate the MOS even if they have specific problems with this or that. I

1753:

have been authorized for the topic, nothing more. Since their point is to deliver this message with regard to a particular topic, I have corrected the notices to do so. As to the specifics of the matter: Whether the template functioned properly or not, you surely are also aware that calling other

1431:

on these matters, and pare it down to universal points they can agree on, to form a single guideline proposal on transit and travel systems, with a particular eye to agreement among not just that collective group of editors but also agreement with as many extant MoS rules as possible. Look for how

1372:

Thank you for your comment on my talk page, it is good to see you are also patrolling this page. Allow me to buy you a beer at the next Wikimeetup. I will be however be defending the integrity of wikipedia by commenting of page moves that are outside the remit of MOS on capitalisation. The issue is

819:

factional behavior of "FAC vs. MoS" and "FAC vs. CITE" and "FAC vs. infobox fans", etc. I took a bit of a wikibreak after that, anyway, as my blood pressure was obviously going up. I apologize for the ranty-pants tone and for pointing at you in particular (especially after complaining about being

1879:

to tendentiously "fight back" over style trivia in an entire topic. No one else did anything like that, so no one else needed a DS alert, and at least two of the others have received or left one in the last year anyway (we're told not to re-template people for DS in the same topic until 12 months

1463:

PS: As a linguist by training (and one well aware of philosophy as well as linguistics approaches to proper names), I cannot agree with you that "Woodhead line" is a proper name. "Woodhead" is. "Woodhead line" is a descriptive appellation, the "line to/from Woodhead". Something like "Princess

869:

WT:FAC two months ago indicates otherwise, including FAC-wide defensiveness of two editors who had spent months doing little but sustained conflict generation against and verbal abuse of anyone who disagreed with them about much of anything – defense simply because they're FAC regulars – and a

1884:

was enacted against. Castigating me for leaving the ArbCom-prescribed template (which many of us don't like the wording of but which ArbCom declines to improve), and doing so on the basis of nothing but me having a case typo in the template, is not useful. Nor is yelling at me over an edit

1911:

approach, and even giving suggestions on how to be successful at it, despite the fact that his success would result in a style change I disagree with. I'm not being any kind of asshole here, you're just trying desperately to paint a picture of me being one. If you think that

1448:, and a lot less "oh no, not this again" conflict at RM. The existing conflict level is not due just to specialist resistance against MoS rules but disagreement among different knots of specialists, because some of these would-be fiefdoms are very narrow (US highways, etc.). 682:

Hi, I'm writing to inform you that I've opened a new general Request for Comment concerning whether predecessors and successors should be included in the Infobox Officeholder template, further to my RfC concerning Michael Portillo specifically. The new RfC can be found here:

792:

was meant for me, but perhaps you meant Herostratus? He's not active at FAC, and never has been as far as I know. I saw your follow up note at WT:FAC; I don't know how often something will come up, but I suspect it'll be more than twice a year; let's see how it goes.

2800:

that confuses readers who aren't steeped in that specialty, it's almost invariably one-article territoriality by editors who describe themselves as "authors" of those articles. The latter was definitely the source of the outbreak of anti-MoS activity that begin at

527: 269:

the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new

1875:

irritated that I templated one of your buddies, as your comment further implies. Read the actual discussion, please. One of them labelled another editor's views "idiocy", and the other strongly suggested he was going to canvass together a

1036: 517: 2333: 537: 1027: 1460:

and whether it disfavors or favors capitalization of strips of track is ultimately arbitrary. It is better for them to be consistent one way or the other than different from article to article based on who yelled more.

740:

I'll get over it, and I think we were misunderstanding each other to an extent. Commented there already to clarify. I don't recall saying that you in particular had said unpleasant things about me. Rather, a certain

757:

behavior of any particular gaggle of editors, even if they feel themselves to be First Class Citizens because of their particular focus and who their wikifriends are. They make being here increasingly unpleasant, but

532: 1749:

is an indication of having read them. Lamberhurst having deleted one is not specially meaningful in any way, and nothing for you to get into Knight in Shining Armor mode about. These notices are simply FYIs that

1426:

Another approach, and arguably a much better one than seeking a micro-topical special rule (which will probably fail), would be for all the disparate projects on trains, roads, etc., to combine their wikiproject

302: 1392:

Clem, what's this concept of "outside the remit of MOS on capitalisation"? You mean you intend to capitalize more than proper nouns, for some reason, in spite of what the MOS says? What's the reason?

522: 1423:. MoS has many particular rules for particular contexts, and the way to get another added is to get consensus to add one, not to defy the general rules until exploding in a bout of name-calling. 3099:

I'm not sure what you mean by that and suspect that I would object strongly if I did. But I don't want to prolong the discussion either... does the distinction you're making there really matter?

1440:

process for a round of input from MoS regulars, and general editors from outside either sphere, to make it more consistent with general-audience readership expectations instead of reflecting

1620: 111: 1530:, as a draft for an upcoming proposal of the process, and I tagged it as "Brainstorming". You can contribute there. Meanwhile, I'm planning to notify others at other venues. I did that at 400: 1891:

above this one. It shows two things: A) One of the templated parties making it clear that they intend to pursue this overcapitalization indefinitely on the basis of personal belief – a

2736:

Thanks, you too! This reminds me of a joke: "Have you read Dr. Seuss's pirate Christmas story?" "No." "It opens, 'Ho ho ho / And a bottle of rum / Bum-ditty-bum-ditty / Bum-bum-bum'."

1415:

Dicklyon is correct in objecting to the idea of your favorite topic being somehow "outside the remit of MoS". No articles are outside the remit of site-wide guidelines, as a matter of

1885:

conflict. They happen, and it's my job to fix my own template anyway, not yours, but no one cares – why are you getting angry about who fixed it? Maybe take a nice walk or something.

1051: 323: 2796:

is in fact the heart of the above matter, due to the specific commentary and rationales that lead to these disputes. If it's not an attempt by a wikiproject to impose some

1377:

and other named rail-lines. Incidently it was the suggestion that I flagged as stupid- the sort of misjudgement I am likely to make when I have been editing too long, --

2805:

about three months ago, including two proposals to create an FAC-specific "counter-MoS" to have FAs be except from most MoS compliance (both launched by the same editor

310: 544: 2873:

It's a bit mystifying, unless viewed as not a substantive matter, but simply territorial, "wiki-political" control behavior. Very human, but very unconstructive.

3017:

only from making baseless allegations and using insulting language. Nothing more. I am surprised to have to have to spell that out, but I hope it is now clear.

1789:

has been on my watchlist continuously since 1 August 2009 (we often exchange ideas) and so any message sent to them is going to gain my attention; (ii) because

707: 2604:

As I said, I'm just trying to cover as much ground as possible (referring to both existing and potential anti-diacritic rules) by using both "any" and "all".

3113:

If you don't want to prolong the discussion, stop asking questions, perhaps. Toward the goal of cessation, I will decline to answer it, or any further ones.

2332:

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a

1047: 319: 2254: 3093:

Yes, I have modified my behaviour. The metaphor I used was misunderstood, and counterproductive to say the least. I am being more careful. How about you?

3033:

sometimes necessary. Part of the social compact we make editing here is a willingness to listen to critical input and adjust what we do based on it.

1903:

tactic – regardless what the guidelines say, because he's certain his topic is not subject to any stinking guidelines. B) Me suggesting the standard

232:

We now have 830 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

3226: 3059:

so taking the issue to your talk page appears to have been productive, even if the defensive back-and-forth there has dragged out unnecessarily.

1315:

FYI. You posted on an RfC on this page, but your comment indicated you may have intended to instead post on the Requested Move on the same page.

1535: 3279: 2930: 2394: 2182: 1531: 1265: 1211: 935: 378: 352: 186: 2353: 1058: 860: 806: 723: 448: 3229:

could do with some input on the subject of natural as opposed to parenthesized disambiguation, which I know you've discussed in the past.

1445: 301:- please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the 856: 802: 719: 1419:

policy. If you think that all railway segments should be treated as proper names, you're welcome to make a proposal to that effect at

429:

for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See

1290: 684: 1616: 297:

could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey.

3169: 3125: 3071: 3045: 2885: 2841: 2748: 2630: 2584: 2498: 2291: 2140: 2027: 1988: 1932: 1771: 1672: 1569: 1484: 1352: 1162: 1119: 882: 832: 774: 641: 558: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1692: 2826: 2263: 2099: 2349: 2250: 1054: 790:

unabashed, perpetual character assassination by you and the rest of your FAC clique against me and the rest of the MoS regulars

444: 2212: 2061: 815:

Oh, geez. The "you and" part should just have been left off, as my issue with this stuff has actually been entirely about the

3283: 3245: 3254: 3208: 2911: 2375: 2314: 1527: 1508: 1499: 1299: 1246: 1192: 967: 916: 664: 467: 167: 120: 1639:." links to a disambiguation page which is of no discernable relevance. It appears to me that you served both of them with 3196:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2820:, with the PoV-forking of CITEVAR from ENGVAR/DATEVAR, has already been a serious problem, and also has a strong anti-MoS 2719: 507: 425:

are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on

2231: 2080: 685:

Template_talk:Infobox_officeholder#RfC:_Should_predecessors_and_successors_be_included_in_officeholders.27_infoboxes.3F

3090:

is both unclear and insulting. I have given other examples and can give more, but I think you should know what I mean.

3139:

And for your part, stop making vague and/or baseless allegations, and using insulting language. On that basis, pax.

2605: 2274: 2245: 1631:

In particular, this shows "pages regarding , a topic which you have edited" which makes no sense to me - regarding

1464:

Diana Memorial Line" would be a proper name, having no descriptive function at all. Thus the distinction between "

38: 2112: 247:

over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing

2811:, the latter generating some variant proposals, none of which carried or resulting in changes to the FA criteria 1006:

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

1420: 318:

Originally sent to all New Page Reviewers 26 November 2016. This message sent manually. Discuss this newsletter

1951:. I came here to ask why you left a misformed message, and didn't fix it soon after it was posted. If leaving 1917: 1896: 550:

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

3234: 1959:

good practice to read through what you posted, in order to ensure that it says what you wanted it to say. --

852: 798: 715: 564:(user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings. 190: 158: 2651: 2531: 1335: 1316: 608: 485: 2793: 2336:

ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~

746: 3166: 3122: 3068: 3042: 2882: 2838: 2745: 2670: 2627: 2581: 2495: 2288: 2137: 2123: 2090: 2024: 1985: 1929: 1786: 1768: 1666: 1566: 1481: 1469: 1349: 1159: 1116: 1079:." I nominate that sentence for the Knowledge (XXG) sentence of the year (which alas does not exist)! -- 939: 907: 879: 829: 771: 638: 47: 17: 2802: 2674: 1908: 1904: 1812: 1437: 1428: 1416: 759: 547:

that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

2149: 2094: 2863: 2774: 1686: 1382: 1138: 1084: 998: 696: 2821: 1876: 1444:, we would probably end up with a new MoS subpage specifically about transit and travel systems for 750: 742: 1967: 1846: 1703: 1547: 408: 147: 1881: 1755: 1745: 1133:

Being rather unhackish myself, I had never heard it before, but it is now my new favorite word! --

3230: 1801: 1657:

these two users were potentially in breach of. I would also like to know why you thought such an

1398: 1215: 1183: 848: 794: 735: 711: 692: 2715: 1952: 1900: 1750: 1658: 1654: 1880:

have passed, remember?). The concerns were valid; they are in fact the kind of hostility that

3294: 3144: 3104: 3022: 2991: 2945: 2409: 2197: 2054: 2047: 1913: 1731: 1642: 1280: 1226: 987: 950: 624: 601: 569: 367: 356: 345: 331: 235: 217: 201: 3271: 2817: 1892: 139: 3160: 3116: 3062: 3036: 2934: 2902: 2876: 2832: 2791:

Happy holidays to you as well! I avoided the booze but overate like a greedy piglet. : -->

2739: 2731: 2665: 2621: 2575: 2489: 2443:

Hi SMcCandlish, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

2282: 2186: 2159: 2131: 2018: 2012: 1979: 1923: 1762: 1723: 1662: 1623:

to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is

1560: 1475: 1465: 1433: 1343: 1269: 1237: 1153: 1110: 873: 823: 765: 632: 2829:

will only address content disputes that are in mainspace. Guidelines are in a limbo state.

2797: 1736:

template (there is - it doesn't do case conversion on the codes; and I think you know that

1441: 754: 440: 271: 3298: 3238: 3178: 3148: 3134: 3108: 3080: 3054: 3026: 2995: 2949: 2894: 2867: 2859: 2850: 2786: 2778: 2770: 2757: 2639: 2612: 2593: 2507: 2469: 2413: 2357: 2300: 2258: 2225: 2201: 2036: 1997: 1971: 1941: 1850: 1780: 1719: 1707: 1682: 1578: 1551: 1493: 1410: 1402: 1386: 1378: 1361: 1327: 1284: 1230: 1171: 1142: 1134: 1128: 1103: 1096: 1088: 1080: 1062: 954: 891: 864: 841: 810: 783: 727: 650: 613: 575: 452: 412: 392: 371: 335: 205: 151: 1539: 1456: 1838:

called other editors idiots. Please find and post a diff demonstrating that I did so. --

528:"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages 505:

message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the

2658: 2567: 2552: 2481: 2457: 1960: 1865: 1839: 1715: 1696: 1543: 404: 143: 112:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_28#Knowledge (XXG):JUSTAVOTE

2427: 1304: 2816:

Similar "us vs. them" and "my content vs. the horde of barbarians" trench-digging at

2398: 2366: 2337: 2237:

Thank you for all your good work during 2016 in maintaining, improving and expanding

1797: 1394: 1374: 688: 3290: 3140: 3100: 3018: 2987: 2941: 2405: 2193: 2069: 1804:

is on my watchlist; (iii) beacuse I want to see fair play: you templated these two

1276: 1222: 946: 590: 436: 363: 327: 197: 2238: 2085: 1916:

itself is problematic (many of us do, in different ways), please take that up at

1451:

These transit-related RMs and the amount of heat rather than light they generate

2522: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

430: 3259: 2706: 2171: 513:

that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

2682: 1790: 2702: 2694: 2690: 2678: 1050:. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from 657:

RfC: Inclusion of predecessors and successors in officeholders' infoboxes

322:. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from 384: 3227:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Dinosaurs#Following naming conventions

418:

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

433:. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) 2698: 2686: 1455:

getting tedious. Fans of overcapitalization are not in a position to

253:

Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

1472:", an evocative not descriptively locating name. But anyway .... 1436:, if site-wide consensus favored it we would live with it. After a 1107:. Right up there with "creeping featuritis" in perpetual utility. 484: 234: 138:

I invite you to an ongoing RfD discussion about those redirect to

460:

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

2128:

You too! Those snowy pictures remind me of my time in Canada.

3097:

Given that you've only responded emotively not substantively...

1599:

Regarding the templated messages that you sent to two users at

289:

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features,

1635:

specifically? Also, the sentence "The Committee's decision is

25: 2542:"Here's hoping that the worst end of your trail is behind you 1075:

I just noticed your comment at meta in the wishlist survey: "

554:

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded

391:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2657: 2650: 2262: 2211: 2098: 2060: 2053: 2046: 1811:

I am not criticising Lamberhurst for removing that notice -

1557:

I stopped by, but I see you've already abandoned the idea.

986: 383: 216: 2084:, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand 1695:) has not, so the message is still there for all to see. -- 1636: 1624: 2709:, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! 1758:

and there is no case to dismiss on a technicality. : -->

745:

at WT:FAC, with a lot of overlap with similar cliques at

629:

Sanka you very much. I do love to caffeinate some rats.

1046:

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter

3008: 3003: 2983: 2976: 2812: 2809: 2806: 1827: 1821: 1677: 1607: 1601: 789: 597: 545:

more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general

2572:

You too! Maybe you'll get a pony for Christmas. ;-)

1785:

I'm taking an interest for three reasons: (i) because

309:. Many other important user suggestions are listed at 518:

Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled

2969:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

1446:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) Manual of Style (transport)

1681:without comment, and I do not blame them; however, 2544:That Dad Time be your friend from here to the end 1920:; DS is long overdue for a review and retooling. 788:With regard to negative comments, I assumed that 3086:A term can be clear and still be insulting, but 1373:very simple- its a Proper Noun. But back to the 3002:If you want me to desist, then don't pointedly 1819:for delivering a misformed message, and when I 1647:, but "AT" is not recognised by this template. 1150:is full of good laughs (and pre-dates "LOLs"). 431:BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon 2858:content. I guess that could go to one's head. 8: 538:Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list 211:New Page Review - newsletter (November 2016) 2792:;-) I'm almost certain that resistance to 760:WP doesn't really need anyone in particular 399:redirect, you might want to participate in 2677:! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's 1808:that was involved in that move discussion. 395:. Since you had some involvement with the 2546:And sickness nor sorrow don't find you." 2446:Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia! 2307:Extended confirmed protection policy RfC 1740:was obviously intended if the input was 749:and various wikiprojects (and sometimes 533:Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android 523:Editor-focused central editing dashboard 2549:—C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1926. 284:- 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote 1741: 1737: 1728:There seems to be some issue with the 1076: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2982:But I have some problems with it, as 2714:Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ 1650:I would therefore like to know which 7: 2963:The following discussion is closed. 2447: 1101:It is a favorite hackish word, from 495:Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers! 1542:for last. Where else besides it? -- 1744:). It is supposed to link to the 1457:indefinitely resist tooth and nail 1291:Talk:Pizzagate (conspiracy theory) 403:if you have not already done so. 24: 2606: 2243:All the best for 2017! Cheers, — 2011:Posted potential template fix at 1528:Knowledge (XXG):Discussion review 1500:Knowledge (XXG):Discussion review 1468:" ( "station at Van Ness ") and " 3258: 3252: 3213: 3206: 3192:The discussion above is closed. 2916: 2909: 2521: 2448: 2426: 2380: 2373: 2319: 2312: 2166: 2068: 1590: 1513: 1506: 1303: 1297: 1251: 1244: 1197: 1190: 972: 965: 921: 914: 669: 662: 589: 472: 465: 227:Breaking the back of the backlog 172: 165: 125: 118: 29: 3282:is asking for participation in 2933:is asking for participation in 2397:is asking for participation in 2185:is asking for participation in 1976:No debate on that point! :-) 1611:, please explain the paragraph 1585:Discretionary sanctions notices 1268:is asking for participation in 1214:is asking for participation in 960:New Page Review - newsletter #2 938:is asking for participation in 355:is asking for participation in 189:is asking for participation in 3286:Talk:American Idol (season 11) 3246:Talk:American Idol (season 11) 2722:}} to your friends' talk pages 509:2016 Community Wishlist Survey 251:- that's about 5 minutes work! 1: 3299:04:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 3253: 3239:21:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 3207: 3179:03:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 3158: 3149:03:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 3135:02:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 3114: 3109:00:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 3081:19:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC) 3060: 3055:19:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC) 3034: 3027:13:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC) 2996:05:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC) 2950:04:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC) 2910: 2895:17:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC) 2874: 2868:16:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC) 2851:15:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC) 2830: 2779:03:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC) 2758:19:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC) 2737: 2720:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a 2640:11:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 2619: 2613:07:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 2594:04:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 2573: 2508:04:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 2487: 2470:22:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 2435:Merry Christmas SMcCandlish!! 2414:04:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 2374: 2358:16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 2313: 2301:17:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 2280: 2279:Thanks, and back at ya. :-) 2259:16:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC) 2202:04:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 2150:17:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 2129: 2095:15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 2037:19:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 2016: 1998:22:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1977: 1972:22:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1947:I didn't come here to defend 1942:20:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1921: 1851:19:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1781:18:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1760: 1708:10:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1579:18:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 1558: 1552:08:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1507: 1494:18:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1473: 1403:04:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 1387:18:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC) 1362:18:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 1341: 1328:18:48, 17 December 2016 (UTC) 1298: 1285:04:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC) 1245: 1231:04:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC) 1191: 1172:16:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC) 1151: 1143:20:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC) 1129:06:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC) 1108: 1089:22:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC) 1063:06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) 966: 955:04:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC) 915: 892:05:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 871: 865:20:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC) 842:19:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC) 821: 811:18:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC) 784:07:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC) 763: 663: 630: 466: 166: 119: 3284:this request for comment on 2935:this request for comment on 2399:this request for comment on 2232:Christmas and holiday season 2187:this request for comment on 2177:Closed it as an invalid RfC. 1888: 1661:was appropriate. I see that 1270:this request for comment on 1216:this request for comment on 940:this request for comment on 728:22:59, 9 December 2016 (UTC) 697:19:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC) 651:14:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC) 614:14:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC) 576:01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC) 453:23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 413:20:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 372:04:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 357:this request for comment on 336:02:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 299:Voting starts on 28 November 206:04:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 191:this request for comment on 152:19:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC) 2486:, and you and yours! :-) 2111:Spread the WikiLove; use {{ 3314: 3250: 3204: 2907: 2371: 2350:MediaWiki message delivery 2310: 2164: 1813:it is their right to do so 1588: 1504: 1295: 1242: 1188: 1055:MediaWiki message delivery 1035:Reduce your review load: 1020:ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE 963: 912: 660: 463: 445:MediaWiki message delivery 377:Template:Source listed at 163: 116: 2955:Your post at my talk page 2425: 2113:subst:Season's Greetings1 2041: 1012:Getting the tools we need 305:Community Wishlist Survey 282:Getting the tools we need 276:section in the tutorial. 249:only 2 or 3 reviews a day 3280:feedback request service 3194:Please do not modify it. 2966:Please do not modify it. 2931:feedback request service 2395:feedback request service 2183:feedback request service 1266:feedback request service 1212:feedback request service 936:feedback request service 656: 582:A cup of coffee for you! 559:User wikipedia/RC Patrol 379:Redirects for discussion 353:feedback request service 187:feedback request service 2115:}} to send this message 1621:discretionary sanctions 1608:18:00, 17 December 2016 1602:17:57, 17 December 2016 1536:WT:requests for comment 997:Please help reduce the 401:the redirect discussion 239:Mid July to 01 Oct 2016 193:Talk:Scarlett Johansson 159:Talk:Scarlett Johansson 3201:Natural disambiguation 2827:WP:Mediation Committee 2798:geeky specialist style 2662: 2655: 2557:23 December 2016 (UTC) 2267: 2216: 2207:All the best for 2017! 2103: 2065: 2058: 2051: 1629: 1532:WT:closing discussions 991: 489: 388: 243:If each reviewer does 240: 221: 2661: 2654: 2275:Gareth Griffith-Jones 2266: 2246:Gareth Griffith-Jones 2215: 2102: 2064: 2057: 2050: 1870:I said nothing about 1787:User talk:Lamberhurst 1617:Arbitration Committee 1613: 1470:Grand Central Station 990: 942:Talk:Goa Opinion Poll 908:Talk:Goa Opinion Poll 488: 387: 273:Monitoring the system 245:only 10 reviews a day 238: 220: 42:of past discussions. 18:User talk:SMcCandlish 3157:hatted there, too.) 1526:I created the page, 702:FYI on WT:FAC thread 1887:Anyway, see thread 1822:attempted to fix it 1815:. I am criticising 1796:who move-protected 1756:This is not a court 1077:Flow is bletcherous 1026:Improve the tools: 543:Further, there are 427:Thursday 8 December 140:WP:AADD#Just a vote 3244:Please comment on 3155: 2901:Please comment on 2663: 2656: 2472: 2437: 2365:Please comment on 2268: 2248: 2220:Hello SMcCandlish, 2217: 2158:Please comment on 2104: 2076:Hello SMcCandlish: 2066: 2059: 2052: 2042:Season's Greetings 1802:Talk:Woodhead Line 1678:reverted your edit 1236:Please comment on 1218:Talk:Frank Gaffney 1184:Talk:Frank Gaffney 1182:Please comment on 1071:Great word choice! 992: 985:Hello SMcCandlish, 906:Please comment on 490: 423:New Page Reviewers 389: 344:Please comment on 267:New Page Reviewers 259:Second set of eyes 241: 222: 215:Hello SMcCandlish, 157:Please comment on 3154:Please just stop. 3153: 2979:on my talk page. 2723: 2675:Seasons Greetings 2562: 2561: 2550: 2476: 2475: 2442: 2433: 2361: 2345: 2244: 1914:Template:Ds/alert 1800:and so naturally 1442:specialist quirks 1336:Timothyjosephwood 1065: 619: 618: 578: 565: 456: 359:Talk:Fidel Castro 346:Talk:Fidel Castro 338: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3305: 3275: 3262: 3256: 3255: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3210: 3209: 3177: 3133: 3079: 3053: 2968: 2937:Talk:North Korea 2924: 2920: 2919: 2913: 2912: 2903:Talk:North Korea 2893: 2849: 2790: 2756: 2735: 2713: 2668: 2638: 2610: 2592: 2571: 2555: 2548: 2525: 2518: 2517: 2506: 2485: 2467: 2462: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2430: 2423: 2422: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2377: 2376: 2347: 2341: 2327: 2323: 2322: 2316: 2315: 2299: 2278: 2189:Talk:Jollof rice 2178: 2170: 2169: 2160:Talk:Jollof rice 2148: 2127: 2124:Northamerica1000 2116: 2093: 2072: 2035: 2013:Template talk:Ds 1996: 1963: 1940: 1869: 1842: 1830: 1824: 1779: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1727: 1699: 1680: 1655:area of conflict 1646: 1610: 1604: 1594: 1593: 1577: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1510: 1509: 1492: 1466:Van Ness station 1434:special pleading 1414: 1360: 1339: 1325: 1322: 1319: 1307: 1301: 1300: 1272:Talk:Johor Bahru 1259: 1255: 1254: 1248: 1247: 1238:Talk:Johor Bahru 1205: 1201: 1200: 1194: 1193: 1170: 1127: 1100: 1052:the mailing list 1045: 1022: 999:New Page backlog 980: 976: 975: 969: 968: 929: 925: 924: 918: 917: 890: 840: 782: 739: 677: 673: 672: 666: 665: 649: 628: 611: 606: 593: 586: 585: 573: 563: 557: 553: 510: 480: 476: 475: 469: 468: 434: 324:the mailing list 317: 311:at Page Curation 180: 176: 175: 169: 168: 133: 129: 128: 122: 121: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3313: 3312: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3276: 3269: 3267: 3266: 3249: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3214: 3212: 3203: 3198: 3197: 3175: 3131: 3077: 3051: 2984:described there 2973: 2964: 2957: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2917: 2915: 2906: 2891: 2847: 2784: 2766: 2754: 2729: 2726: 2673:is wishing you 2666: 2648: 2636: 2602: 2590: 2565: 2553: 2532:Charlie Russell 2516: 2504: 2479: 2463: 2458: 2449: 2421: 2419:Merry Christmas 2391: 2390: 2389: 2381: 2379: 2370: 2344: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2320: 2318: 2309: 2297: 2272: 2269: 2239:Knowledge (XXG) 2226:Winter Solstice 2209: 2179: 2176: 2174: 2167: 2163: 2146: 2121: 2118: 2110: 2105: 2089: 2086:Knowledge (XXG) 2073: 2044: 2033: 1994: 1961: 1955:messages, it's 1938: 1863: 1840: 1826: 1820: 1806:and nobody else 1777: 1729: 1713: 1697: 1676: 1640: 1619:has authorised 1606: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1591: 1587: 1575: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1514: 1512: 1503: 1490: 1408: 1370: 1358: 1340:Fixed, thanks. 1333: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1294: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1252: 1250: 1241: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1198: 1196: 1187: 1168: 1125: 1104:The Jargon File 1094: 1073: 1068: 1018: 1014: 1002: 983: 982: 981: 973: 971: 962: 932: 931: 930: 922: 920: 911: 888: 838: 780: 733: 704: 680: 679: 678: 670: 668: 659: 647: 622: 609: 602: 584: 561: 555: 508: 498: 483: 482: 481: 473: 471: 462: 420: 397:Template:Source 393:Template:Source 382: 349: 341: 328:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 285: 261: 229: 213: 183: 182: 181: 173: 171: 162: 136: 135: 134: 126: 124: 115: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3311: 3309: 3257: 3251: 3248: 3242: 3211: 3205: 3202: 3199: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3173: 3129: 3094: 3091: 3075: 3049: 3013:I want you to 2972: 2971: 2959: 2958: 2956: 2953: 2914: 2908: 2905: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2889: 2855: 2854: 2845: 2765: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2752: 2710: 2649: 2647: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2634: 2618:Works for me. 2601: 2600:Re: Diacritics 2598: 2597: 2596: 2588: 2560: 2559: 2551: 2547: 2545: 2543: 2538: 2537: 2535: 2530:Wishing you a 2527: 2526: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2502: 2474: 2473: 2454: 2444: 2439: 2438: 2431: 2420: 2417: 2378: 2372: 2369: 2363: 2342: 2317: 2311: 2308: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2295: 2242: 2236: 2221: 2210: 2208: 2205: 2165: 2162: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2144: 2108: 2081:holiday season 2067: 2045: 2043: 2040: 2031: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1992: 1936: 1897:WP:GREATWRONGS 1873: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1832: 1809: 1775: 1643:subst:ds/alert 1589: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1573: 1511: 1505: 1502: 1497: 1488: 1454: 1406: 1405: 1369: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1356: 1302: 1296: 1293: 1288: 1249: 1243: 1240: 1234: 1195: 1189: 1186: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1166: 1123: 1072: 1069: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1033: 1016: 1015: 1010: 1004: 1003: 995: 984: 970: 964: 961: 958: 919: 913: 910: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 886: 836: 818: 778: 703: 700: 667: 661: 658: 655: 654: 653: 645: 617: 616: 604:Blue Rasberry 594: 583: 580: 568:Best regards, 541: 540: 535: 530: 525: 520: 492: 470: 464: 461: 458: 419: 416: 381: 375: 348: 342: 315: 295:New Pages Feed 287: 286: 280: 263: 262: 257: 252: 233: 231: 230: 225: 214: 212: 209: 170: 164: 161: 155: 123: 117: 114: 109: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3310: 3301: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3287: 3281: 3273: 3265: 3261: 3247: 3243: 3241: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3231:Peter coxhead 3228: 3220: 3200: 3195: 3180: 3171: 3168: 3165: 3163: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3127: 3124: 3121: 3119: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3095: 3092: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3073: 3070: 3067: 3065: 3056: 3047: 3044: 3041: 3039: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3011: 3009: 3007: 3005: 2998: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2980: 2978: 2970: 2967: 2961: 2960: 2954: 2952: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2932: 2923: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2887: 2884: 2881: 2879: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2853: 2852: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2835: 2828: 2823: 2819: 2813: 2810: 2807: 2804: 2799: 2795: 2788: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2763: 2759: 2750: 2747: 2744: 2742: 2733: 2728: 2727: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2669: 2660: 2653: 2645: 2641: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2624: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2599: 2595: 2586: 2583: 2580: 2578: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2558: 2556: 2540: 2539: 2536:SMcCandlish! 2533: 2529: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2519: 2513: 2509: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2492: 2483: 2478: 2477: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2461: 2455: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2429: 2424: 2418: 2416: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2402: 2401:Talk:New York 2396: 2387: 2368: 2367:Talk:New York 2364: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2346: 2340: 2335: 2326: 2306: 2302: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2285: 2276: 2271: 2270: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2247: 2240: 2234: 2233: 2228: 2227: 2222: 2214: 2206: 2204: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2184: 2173: 2161: 2157: 2151: 2142: 2139: 2136: 2134: 2125: 2120: 2119: 2117: 2114: 2107: 2106: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2091:North America 2087: 2083: 2082: 2077: 2071: 2063: 2056: 2049: 2039: 2038: 2029: 2026: 2023: 2021: 2014: 1999: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1982: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1926: 1919: 1915: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1883: 1878: 1871: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1828:cancelled out 1823: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1798:Woodhead Line 1795: 1794: 1788: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1773: 1770: 1767: 1765: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1733: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1694: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1679: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1653: 1648: 1644: 1638: 1634: 1628: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1612: 1609: 1603: 1584: 1580: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1538:. I'm saving 1537: 1533: 1529: 1520: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1495: 1486: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1471: 1467: 1461: 1458: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1429:project pages 1424: 1422: 1418: 1412: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1375:Woodhead Line 1367: 1363: 1354: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1337: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1310: 1306: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1267: 1258: 1239: 1235: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1213: 1204: 1185: 1181: 1173: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1121: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1106: 1105: 1098: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1070: 1067: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1040: 1039: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1021: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1001: 1000: 994: 993: 989: 979: 959: 957: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943: 937: 928: 909: 905: 893: 884: 881: 878: 876: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 849:Mike Christie 845: 844: 843: 834: 831: 828: 826: 816: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 795:Mike Christie 791: 787: 786: 785: 776: 773: 770: 768: 761: 756: 752: 748: 744: 737: 736:Mike Christie 732: 731: 730: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 712:Mike Christie 709: 701: 699: 698: 694: 690: 686: 676: 652: 643: 640: 637: 635: 626: 621: 620: 615: 612: 607: 605: 600:to rodents. 599: 595: 592: 588: 587: 581: 579: 577: 571: 566: 560: 551: 548: 546: 539: 536: 534: 531: 529: 526: 524: 521: 519: 516: 515: 514: 512: 511: 504: 503:one-time-only 499: 497: 496: 487: 479: 459: 457: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 432: 428: 424: 417: 415: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 386: 380: 376: 374: 373: 369: 365: 361: 360: 354: 347: 343: 340: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 314: 312: 308: 307: 306: 300: 296: 292: 291:Page Curation 283: 279: 278: 277: 275: 274: 268: 265:Not only are 260: 256: 255: 254: 250: 246: 237: 228: 224: 223: 219: 210: 208: 207: 203: 199: 195: 194: 188: 179: 160: 156: 154: 153: 149: 145: 141: 132: 113: 110: 106:December 2016 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3285: 3277: 3263: 3225: 3218: 3193: 3161: 3117: 3096: 3088:pseudo-civil 3087: 3063: 3057: 3037: 3014: 3012: 3006:me back here 3001: 2999: 2981: 2974: 2965: 2962: 2936: 2928: 2921: 2877: 2856: 2833: 2815: 2794:WP:MERCILESS 2767: 2740: 2712: 2705:or even the 2664: 2622: 2607: 2603: 2576: 2541: 2514:Holiday card 2490: 2464: 2459: 2445: 2434: 2400: 2392: 2385: 2338: 2331: 2324: 2283: 2230: 2224: 2219: 2218: 2188: 2180: 2132: 2109: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2019: 2010: 1980: 1956: 1948: 1924: 1886: 1835: 1816: 1805: 1792: 1763: 1689: 1669: 1659:alert notice 1651: 1649: 1632: 1630: 1614: 1598: 1561: 1525: 1518: 1476: 1462: 1450: 1425: 1407: 1371: 1344: 1314: 1308: 1271: 1263: 1256: 1217: 1209: 1202: 1154: 1147: 1111: 1102: 1074: 1044: 1037: 1028: 1019: 1017: 1011: 1005: 996: 977: 941: 933: 926: 874: 824: 766: 705: 681: 674: 633: 625:Bluerasberry 603: 598:your service 570:Stevietheman 567: 552: 549: 542: 506: 502: 500: 494: 493: 491: 477: 437:user:Kudpung 426: 422: 421: 396: 390: 358: 350: 316: 304: 303: 298: 294: 290: 288: 281: 272: 266: 264: 258: 248: 244: 242: 226: 192: 184: 177: 137: 130: 78: 43: 37: 3162:SMcCandlish 3118:SMcCandlish 3064:SMcCandlish 3038:SMcCandlish 2975:Thanks for 2878:SMcCandlish 2834:SMcCandlish 2741:SMcCandlish 2732:Doug Weller 2667:Doug Weller 2623:SMcCandlish 2577:SMcCandlish 2491:SMcCandlish 2284:SMcCandlish 2133:SMcCandlish 2020:SMcCandlish 1981:SMcCandlish 1953:substituted 1925:SMcCandlish 1909:WP:CONLEVEL 1905:WP:PROPOSAL 1764:SMcCandlish 1724:Lamberhurst 1663:Lamberhurst 1562:SMcCandlish 1477:SMcCandlish 1438:WP:PROPOSAL 1417:WP:CONLEVEL 1345:SMcCandlish 1155:SMcCandlish 1112:SMcCandlish 875:SMcCandlish 825:SMcCandlish 767:SMcCandlish 634:SMcCandlish 596:Thanks for 574:Delivered: 98:Archive 125 90:Archive 123 85:Archive 122 79:Archive 121 73:Archive 120 68:Archive 119 60:Archive 115 36:This is an 2860:Primergrey 2822:WP:FACTION 2787:Primergrey 2771:Primergrey 2707:Saturnalia 2534:Christmas, 2334:discussion 2223:Enjoy the 2088:. Cheers, 2078:Enjoy the 1877:WP:FACTION 1720:ClemRutter 1683:ClemRutter 1421:WT:MOSCAPS 1411:ClemRutter 1379:ClemRutter 1135:Tryptofish 1097:Tryptofish 1081:Tryptofish 687:. Thanks, 501:This is a 2977:your post 2683:Christmas 2568:Montanabw 2554:Montanabw 2482:Davey2010 2348:(sent by 2251:The Welsh 1918:WT:ARBCOM 1882:WP:ARBATC 1866:Redrose64 1746:WP:ARBATC 1716:Redrose64 1544:George Ho 1038:Vote here 1029:Vote here 755:ownership 405:George Ho 144:George Ho 3264:Declined 3000:You say 2703:Festivus 2695:Hanukkah 2691:Hogmanay 2679:Solstice 2646:Yo Ho Ho 2229:and the 1901:WP:TRUTH 1889:#Message 1831:my edit. 1751:WP:AC/DS 1732:Ds/alert 1693:contribs 1673:contribs 1652:specific 1595:Resolved 1395:Dicklyon 857:contribs 803:contribs 720:contribs 689:Specto73 3291:Legobot 3272:WP:DGAF 3141:Andrewa 3101:Andrewa 3019:Andrewa 2988:Andrewa 2942:Legobot 2818:WP:CITE 2406:Legobot 2255:Buzzard 2194:Legobot 1949:anybody 1893:WP:IDHT 1834:I have 1791:it was 1722:, and 1605:and at 1368:Message 1318:Timothy 1277:Legobot 1223:Legobot 947:Legobot 861:library 807:library 747:WT:CITE 743:faction 724:library 364:Legobot 198:Legobot 39:archive 3015:desist 3004:summon 2803:WT:FAC 2699:Lenaia 2687:Diwali 2608:Cédric 1964:rose64 1957:always 1843:rose64 1825:, you 1700:rose64 1675:) has 1321:Joseph 706:Hi -- 610:(talk) 2764:Reply 2716:subst 2460:Davey 1836:never 1759:;-) 1645:|AT}} 1540:WP:AN 1309:Fixed 817:group 751:WT:AT 16:< 3295:talk 3289:. 3278:The 3270:per 3235:talk 3219:Done 3145:talk 3105:talk 3023:talk 2992:talk 2946:talk 2940:. 2929:The 2922:Done 2864:talk 2775:talk 2671:talk 2465:2010 2410:talk 2404:. 2393:The 2386:Done 2354:talk 2325:Done 2198:talk 2192:. 2181:The 2172:Moot 1968:talk 1907:and 1847:talk 1742:|AT= 1738:|at= 1704:talk 1687:talk 1667:talk 1637:here 1633:what 1625:here 1615:The 1548:talk 1534:and 1519:Done 1399:talk 1383:talk 1324:Wood 1281:talk 1275:. 1264:The 1257:Done 1227:talk 1221:. 1210:The 1203:Done 1139:talk 1085:talk 1059:talk 1048:here 978:Done 951:talk 945:. 934:The 927:Done 853:talk 799:talk 716:talk 693:talk 675:Done 478:Done 449:talk 439:for 409:talk 368:talk 362:. 351:The 332:talk 320:here 293:and 202:talk 196:. 185:The 178:Done 148:talk 142:. -- 131:Done 3176:ⱷ≼ 3172:≽ⱷ҅ 3132:ⱷ≼ 3128:≽ⱷ҅ 3078:ⱷ≼ 3074:≽ⱷ҅ 3052:ⱷ≼ 3048:≽ⱷ҅ 2892:ⱷ≼ 2888:≽ⱷ҅ 2848:ⱷ≼ 2844:≽ⱷ҅ 2755:ⱷ≼ 2751:≽ⱷ҅ 2681:or 2637:ⱷ≼ 2633:≽ⱷ҅ 2591:ⱷ≼ 2587:≽ⱷ҅ 2505:ⱷ≼ 2501:≽ⱷ҅ 2339:Rob 2298:ⱷ≼ 2294:≽ⱷ҅ 2257:| 2147:ⱷ≼ 2143:≽ⱷ҅ 2034:ⱷ≼ 2030:≽ⱷ҅ 1995:ⱷ≼ 1991:≽ⱷ҅ 1962:Red 1939:ⱷ≼ 1935:≽ⱷ҅ 1872:you 1841:Red 1817:you 1778:ⱷ≼ 1774:≽ⱷ҅ 1698:Red 1576:ⱷ≼ 1572:≽ⱷ҅ 1491:ⱷ≼ 1487:≽ⱷ҅ 1453:are 1359:ⱷ≼ 1355:≽ⱷ҅ 1169:ⱷ≼ 1165:≽ⱷ҅ 1126:ⱷ≼ 1122:≽ⱷ҅ 889:ⱷ≼ 885:≽ⱷ҅ 859:- 839:ⱷ≼ 835:≽ⱷ҅ 805:- 781:ⱷ≼ 777:≽ⱷ҅ 722:- 708:FYI 648:ⱷ≼ 644:≽ⱷ҅ 443:. 441:NPR 326:. 3297:) 3268:– 3237:) 3159:— 3147:) 3115:— 3107:) 3061:— 3035:— 3025:) 3010:. 2994:) 2986:. 2948:) 2875:— 2866:) 2831:— 2814:). 2808:, 2777:) 2738:— 2724:. 2701:, 2697:, 2693:, 2689:, 2685:, 2620:— 2574:— 2488:— 2412:) 2356:) 2343:13 2281:— 2253:| 2249:| 2200:) 2175:– 2130:— 2017:— 2015:. 1978:— 1970:) 1922:— 1899:/ 1895:/ 1849:) 1793:me 1761:— 1734:}} 1730:{{ 1718:, 1706:) 1641:{{ 1559:— 1550:) 1474:— 1401:) 1385:) 1342:— 1283:) 1229:) 1152:— 1148:JF 1141:) 1109:— 1087:) 1066:. 1061:) 953:) 872:— 863:) 855:- 822:— 809:) 801:- 764:— 726:) 718:- 695:) 631:— 572:— 562:}} 556:{{ 451:) 411:) 370:) 339:. 334:) 313:. 204:) 150:) 94:→ 64:← 3293:( 3274:. 3233:( 3174:ᴥ 3170:¢ 3167:☏ 3164:☺ 3143:( 3130:ᴥ 3126:¢ 3123:☏ 3120:☺ 3103:( 3076:ᴥ 3072:¢ 3069:☏ 3066:☺ 3050:ᴥ 3046:¢ 3043:☏ 3040:☺ 3021:( 2990:( 2944:( 2890:ᴥ 2886:¢ 2883:☏ 2880:☺ 2862:( 2846:ᴥ 2842:¢ 2839:☏ 2836:☺ 2789:: 2785:@ 2773:( 2753:ᴥ 2749:¢ 2746:☏ 2743:☺ 2734:: 2730:@ 2718:: 2635:ᴥ 2631:¢ 2628:☏ 2625:☺ 2589:ᴥ 2585:¢ 2582:☏ 2579:☺ 2570:: 2566:@ 2503:ᴥ 2499:¢ 2496:☏ 2493:☺ 2484:: 2480:@ 2456:– 2408:( 2360:) 2352:( 2296:ᴥ 2292:¢ 2289:☏ 2286:☺ 2277:: 2273:@ 2241:. 2235:. 2196:( 2145:ᴥ 2141:¢ 2138:☏ 2135:☺ 2126:: 2122:@ 2032:ᴥ 2028:¢ 2025:☏ 2022:☺ 1993:ᴥ 1989:¢ 1986:☏ 1983:☺ 1966:( 1937:ᴥ 1933:¢ 1930:☏ 1927:☺ 1868:: 1864:@ 1845:( 1776:ᴥ 1772:¢ 1769:☏ 1766:☺ 1726:: 1714:@ 1702:( 1690:· 1685:( 1670:· 1665:( 1627:. 1574:ᴥ 1570:¢ 1567:☏ 1564:☺ 1546:( 1489:ᴥ 1485:¢ 1482:☏ 1479:☺ 1413:: 1409:@ 1397:( 1381:( 1357:ᴥ 1353:¢ 1350:☏ 1347:☺ 1338:: 1334:@ 1279:( 1225:( 1167:ᴥ 1163:¢ 1160:☏ 1157:☺ 1137:( 1124:ᴥ 1120:¢ 1117:☏ 1114:☺ 1099:: 1095:@ 1083:( 1057:( 1032:. 949:( 887:ᴥ 883:¢ 880:☏ 877:☺ 851:( 837:ᴥ 833:¢ 830:☏ 827:☺ 797:( 779:ᴥ 775:¢ 772:☏ 769:☺ 738:: 734:@ 714:( 691:( 646:ᴥ 642:¢ 639:☏ 636:☺ 627:: 623:@ 455:) 447:( 435:( 407:( 366:( 330:( 200:( 146:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index