User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 133

2371:

against candidates for "being wrong" in AfDs more than 5% of the time, or for ever even once having tagged something incorrectly (in the view of the RfA voter) for CfD. I'm not among these people. I'm way more concerned about the know-it-all attitude and temperament issues, plus general lack of experience (time-wise – he actually seems to meet my 10K edits threshold, though I expect little of that to be automated). Someone like TonyBallioni, for example, might have made a good admin that soon, due to conscientious, focused absorption of policy and process while also being an active content editor (I'm not meaning to toot TB's horn over-much, his RfA is just fresh in mind – he was a total shoo-in at 14 months, an unusual landslide support); but Power-enwiki isn't in that category, and most candidates are not. This is one of the reasons I've supported a one-year minimum for RfA the entire time I've been here (and I would even buy into 18 months or so). I know many people hate the idea, but it's a philosophical and emotional, not practical, objection.

1772:

something needs to be done about rats. Especially when you've been provided with well-tested rat traps as an alternative. Even if you really like running around shooting them instead. And even if your family's been shooting them since before the city was incorporated. Even if you're doing it on your own property. And even if you don't understand why its better to trap them than to go around shooting even. Even if you still don't understand, after people explain to you that you're injuring others in your shooting sprees. Even if you rabble-rouse your gun club with a false story that the ordinance against hunting in city limits is actually a statute that plans to take away all their guns. Even if the governor is a friend of yours and verbally abuses one of your city councilmen in public because the governor doesn't agree with the statute the city passed.

2431:

double-edged sword as SWAT teams – great for taking out organized groups of heavily armed felons, but at the cost of public faith in "officer friendly", because a militarized police force is dangerous and abuses its power. Adminship was not a big deal ... only for as long as it was not a big deal. The power to arbitrarily issues block and bans of various kinds, and impose article-level restrictions (which lead to cascading series of blocks and T-bans), without any process other than an old case saying a topic area is under DS, and virtually no recourse (AE and ArbCom virtually never overturn a DS action) is very powerful, and all power leads to abuse.

2673: 3872: 2846:

cachet of it (is there any? Arbs get fists shaken at them a lot), but was tedious work I was signing up to take on. I'm likely to run again next year, on the same "I'm not an admin, and that's a good thing for balance" platform. Because it's true. Adminship is like a combination of security guard and janitor. Has an all access pass to the campus, and that requires a lot of trust, but not everyone wants to fill that role, and it has nothing to do with whether someone would be good on a dispute arbitrating board.

3650:

can vote for who they like, against you, and neural on everyone else, effectively a double oppose against you; meanwhile there is no double-support alternative, except the drastic step of voting for one or two candidates someone supports and against (not neutral on) everyone else. The combination of these effects is that, in any close race for the last 3–5 seats, the numbers will automatically be skewed in favor of newer editors who've collected fewer grudge bearers, even if their actual support level is lower.

1332:, so I don't think you or anyone else need worry about whether some edits from over a day ago might or might not technically might have been sanctionable. It's already stale, and if none of you are editwarring, especially in ways that seem to be system-gaming the confusion about what the the exact 1RR rule is in this case, then no one would take action against any of you, because sanctions are meant to be preventative not a form of retroactive punishment. Have some ice cream and watch a comedy; relax. :-) 3686: 3102: 1704:"or mathematical, chemical, or other formulas" is completely irrelevant. What is on the right of the indent has nothing to do with the HTML and CSS markup used to induce the indentation; they're separate domains. It could be a poem or an interlinear gloss or a diagram of flies mating, and the means for indenting it all are identical, as are concerns about doing it in a crappy way just because it's easier by a few characters. It's a layout and accessibility and 4918: 1947: 232: 2523:; I have little sympathy for people who intentionally choose hard-to-remember usernames with strings of digits in them. I don't have a need for Zero0000 to respond there; while I disagreed with one of the editor's ideas, our mutual support for Callanec's "version 4" makes the matter moot, and the purpose of that page is to provide input on ARCA requests to the ArbCom members, not to engage in back-and-forth threaded conversation for its own sake. 31: 2609: 1730:, none of that got discussed; it was all just a bunch of panicked off-topic noise from maths editors who did not understand the RfC because you confused them about it with a chicken-little story. That sounds more pissy than I really mean it. RfCs get derailed all the time, and I could have written that one better, and notified the wikiproject myself; live and learn. Reasonable discussions are emerging from it, despite the FUD, both at 2162: 936: 2245: 1799:. The only cost is typing a few extra characters to use them. If maths people couldn't handle that, they also couldn't handled maths markup, or wikimarkup in general. You, me, and the other respondents to the RfC and related discussions have already spent more characters and time arguing at the guideline talk page, the RfC, and my talk page than would have been needed to fix hundreds of articles to use the better markup. 3173: 2440:

change would be that losing adminship wouldn't be as huge a deal either; the community would be more apt to forgive after 6 mo. or whatever, rather than treat someone like a criminal for a decade. (That said, I can think of two admins who've regained the bit who never should have because their earlier abuses weren't errors but programmatic abuse of authority, which is a personality problem not a learning-curve issue.)

1528: 466: 3563: 124: 1328:

re-reverts C, that for A, B, and C the "clock" starts from D's re-revert. It may mean more waiting (and ArbCom might not go that far with it), but I cannot see how that interpretation can go wrong as a "how to stay out of trouble" matter. Meanwhile, it's already been more than 24 hours since you raised this question with me, and what the "real" interpretation is remains an open question at

4406:;-) I have actually been proposing a solution like this since ca. 2015, so if others take up the bot idea, maybe it will finally grow legs. It would also prevent system-gaming of the kind of outlined many times (disrupt in one area until "notified", go to another one and do it there, etc., then come back a year later, after notice expiry, and start over again at the original topic). 1881:, and if you're having trouble following three guidelines' wording in a row, this may not be your long suit, even if you're amazing with calculus. This is not about "indent formulas" in particular. Formulas are just content; this is about indenting content, which might be pictures or code snippets, or sports scores, or formulae, or anything else people happen to be indenting. 1685:

and bloc voted against it in confused terms and with much hair-pulling and angsty wailing. Notifying the wikiproject of the discussion made perfect sense. Doing so in entirely misleading and alarming terms did not. I assume that happened out of misapprehension not craft, and blame myself in part for not having been clearer from the start about why not to recommend

1892:" and "there is no guideline conflict" arguments, just don't. The accessibility problem will eventually be fixed one way or another (next month, in 2027, who knows) whether you understand or not. You just go right ahead and keep using colons; others will replace them with better markup after the fact, just as we replace "teh" typos with "the", and add missing 1596: 542: 4822: 1243:

think in the interim that acting as if version 2 is in effect is safest, because the Arbs chiming in so far are leaning toward that direction (or were as of yesterday – I haven't looked since then), and it's the safer interpretations if some admins already use that interpretation, and it's more in keeping with the spirit/point of it, and of course

384: 2256: 4671: 4587: 3957: 3002: 2745: 2485: 2112: 1171: 593: 171: 3199:

indirectly on this encyclopedic project, whose ideals are surely carried by both of our hearts. I'm hoping I have not fallen in your esteem to the level where "no hard feelings" can no longer ring true, because I highly respect you and your dedication to Knowledge (XXG), and I sincerely wish you and your loved ones all the best for 2018.

2368:

that it shouldn't've been speedied. I'm not in a frame of mind to castigate an RfA candidate for having their own interpretation of an essay, or for agreeing that a bad article is bad, or for not jumping on the "process is more important than common sense, and NOT#BUREAU policy doesn't apply when I don't want it to apply" bandwagon.

1693:(sometimes really excessively so) to MoS gnoming to bring old FAs into compliance with current standards, and d) this sort of markup usability thing is precisely the kind of MoS gnome geekery that hardly anyone works on and which only very slowly makes its way into the "live" code of the encyclopedia. Even if an actual WP 3788:

by Roy Peter Clark (it's focused on tweets, headlines, blog copy, etc, but I figure it will also help me reign in my prolixity habit when it comes to talk page posting, which has always been more conversational to me than anything; the fact that SSF originated in copy-pasted talk page material is why

3649:

votes than 50% of the successful candidates, so I don't feel bad about it. Kind of relieved, since ArbCom is reported to be a lot of work and rather thankless for the most part. What we're using right now is a strange and deeply flawed voting system, which gives a double-vote to grudge holders (they

2370:

I had actually already concluded to oppose the candidate on other grounds, though, that are closer to my concerns about admins than "perfection" in deletion squabbling. (RfA was withdrawn before I got around to it.) Yes, I know many editors care more about that than just about anything, and even vote

1754:

in deprecating problematic markup and replacing it with demonstrably better markup. It's Not related in any way to how long a page has been around or how long it has said something; it's only about a maths MoS subpage trying to fight (without even any legitimate cause!) against the main MoS page and

1692:

The reasons FAs use colons for indentation are a) most of them pre-date the templates that do this more accessibly and MoS advice to use them, b) few MoS points are ever "enforced" at FAC (only those that reviewers happen to both notice and give a damn about), c) FAC "stewards" are frequently hostile

382:

The article indicates otherwise: "Taj Television India Private Limited" (which normal people would surely write "Taj Television India Pvt Ltd"). Our article doesn't mention a "10" channel, though I saw that somewhere while looking into this. Even if the "10" thing is wrong, "Ten" is the predominant

4370:

Specifically, regarding the "Ds/alerts" problems you highlighted. Would it lessen the "threat" aspect if the alerts were issued by a bot? What I was thinking is that if an article is tagged (say by edit notice) as under discretionary sanctions, that if an editor makes a substantive edit (let's say a

3629:

Happy holidays, SMcCandlish! I am sorry for stealing your seat at the election; I hope we can still work together. As I am relatively inexperienced and not well versed in policies, I am hoping that I can come to you for advice from time to time (actually, there is a MoS-related case about editors in

3341:

Thanks, and happy Western year-end holiday season! Heh. Heat: I was wandering around last night in just a denim jacket (after seeing the new Star Wars movie) and it wasn't bad. Northern Califoria's pretty warm despite Mark Twain's "The coldest winter I ever spent was summer in San Francisco" quip

2856:

before that). In various editors' voter guides, at least two opposed me because I was involved in MoS. There are people who don't think we should have MoS or that it it should say something that better suits their preferences (usually profession-based, generational, or nationalism-driven), sometimes

2434:

I've also often thought of doing something like a promise of yearly re-election, when I temporarily forget I don't really want to be an admin. I would definitely support the idea that all adminships should be reconfirmed annually, though likely with lower criteria (50+%) passage. I think that would

2367:

arguments made there. I also agree with you that Power-enwiki was mis-citing SNOW, but it is not a policy or guideline, so it seems immaterial. Even those seeking to overturn the deletion on technical CSD grounds are mostly !voting to send it to AfD – they don't think the article will be kept, only

1684:

It's correct that no MoS page has said "colons cannot be used ..."; the RfC didn't posit that one should say that, nor did the edit the RfC was about say that, either. You just made it up out of thin air, and misled the wikiproject that such a proposal was being made, so of course they all showed up

1327:

admins' interpretation, but I predict they'll not do that because it would perpetuate rather than solve the conflict). I think the safe bet is to presume that version 2 will prevail (based on Arbs' responses so far), and further to assume that it means that if A reverts B, and C un-reverts B, and D

4714:

On the MOS talk page you recently wrote: "(our articles are palimpsests stirred together by a global assortment of geniuses, crackpots, and everyone in between, sometimes citing great stuff, sometimes poor stuff, and sometimes nothing)". This, my friend, is a gem. If there's a Hall of Fame for WP

4058:

Yes, I've seen the "Links and anchors" section which is excellent. The right solution, it seems to me, is for this to be fixed in the MediaWiki software, so there's a standard way of doing linking to the heading that produces sensible HTML and generates 'plain' edit summaries. Whether this would be

3776:

is kind of a mixture, and I find the "basics" material in it a little tedious, as if it's aimed at college freshmen and retirees thinking of starting a blog about their hobby. Zero of the advice is wrong though; I've only found 3 errors in it, and the're all trivial (like an adjective mislabeled an

1655:

disagreement because of language recently added to other pages, it seems that those other pages might not accurately reflect the long term consensus about how to format mathematical formulas - those other pages, in effect, would be attempting to fork the previously existing directions from MOSMATH.

1641:

I disagree with your assertion, expressed elsewhere, that the mathematics wiki project is somehow a narrow focus group for the purposes of the mathematics manual of style. MOSMATH dates back to 2002 and is one of the earliest and most well-established parts of the MOS. The math project is the most

1242:

Well, given that it's an open question at ArbCom, I'm skeptical anyone would be addressed under version 2 until after ArbCom decides that is the interpretation to apply, if they do so. I would need to see specific diffs to know what "danger" you or the other editor might think they're in. I would

794:

I may have mistaken who was talking to whom and thus who was adding the unsourced material. You keep not signing your posts, and it makes the conversations very difficult to follow. So does outdenting replies so they are not threaded. I left a thing on the article's talk page, reminding people not

3779:

If it's non-fiction, the key is to outline like mad. You can just start filling in stuff as it occurs to you, and it will already be quasi-organized. Fill in what's missing and massage each section to be cohesive, and the sections to flow together well. This can also help identify material that

3515:

You too! I'm in a cheerier mood already, and have decided I won't argue further on the comma thing over there. Either what I posted on the talk page is convincing (to retain it, or to use one of the alternative versions) or it's not. However, the version with the comma is linked to from at least

3198:

I've caused this year to end on a chord of disappointment for many, but I hope that despite my mistakes and the differences in opinion and perspectives, and regardless of what the outcome is or in what capacity I can still contribute in the coming year, we can continue working together directly or

1835:

agree with these pages, because they have always treated colons as an acceptable way to indent things, possibly apart from block quotations. This is why it was important, in my opinion, for the RFC to establish clearly that colons are an acceptable way to indent formulas, and why I focused on that

1734:

and at Phabricator, so I consider it an overall step forward, despite the verbal abuse I've suffered at Nyttend's hands. I was never going to bother objecting to your canvassing until Nyttend forced my hand by accusing me of unbalancing the RfC when all I did was try to get some people to actually

1035:

Fixed it all up; found the template (I was looking for the "parent" name, and apparently only the full path to the subpages that aren't really subpages would work. Created some additional redirects for things like "Génération·s" and "Génération(s)" to match the alternative spellings used in a few

2845:

the community – to try to really make a difference at ArbCom. But, if a sufficient number of people are never going to accept an Arb candidate who's not already an admin, I have lots of other stuff I can do. I know being an Arb would have been a big time drain; it's not something I wanted for the

2443:

No system is perfect, and "political" ones are always far from it, the more so they more they are rooted in cult-of-personality and fear-of-change psychology. I'm in favor of anything that moves adminship and other aspects of WP's internal governance more toward meritocracy and further away from

4127:

New year greetings. Putting my stupidity hat on- giving clear examples of false code seems weird. Looking at the third example in placement in tables, there is no visual distinction between this and the correct code in the other examples. I am not an expert on the MOS conventions for displaying

3237:

Good season and luck to you as well. Despite being critical of the self-granting to your COI account some bits that require confirmation of trust level, I'm less concerned about this case than some of the other parties. I don't agree with the "prohibit from paid editing" suggestions, just paid

2430:

it super-serious. While it has been somewhat effective at addressing a specific problem (uncivil, obsessive editwarring and battlegrounding in particular topic areas), DS is a blunt and heavy-handed tool, with little effective oversight. This has had consequences. It's exactly the same kind of

1857:

replace it if it sucks). It's about editwarring at a subordinate MoS page to thwart advice from the main MoS page (which has precedence over all MoS pages) and from the accessibility MoS, both of which make it clear that colons for indentation are a problem and that it's preferable to use a more

1830:

Re (2): If no other MOS page says colons cannot be used, and MOSMATH says they can, there is no CONLEVEL issue to start with, because there is no conflict between pages. The only way to see a conflict is to believe that some MOS page forbids the use of colons. Indeed, just today you wrote that

4059:

worth pursuing is another issue. Perhaps it would give some leverage if it could be shown that some of the methods you've laid out, which are actually used by editors, confuse screen readers. However, the key step for me at present is to get text like yours (slightly amended here) into the MoS:

3464:

Sorry, that was more testy than was warranted. I just spent an hour and half in transit, only to miss a connecting (and limited) train by less than two minutes due to a delay on a streetcar on the way to the station; cost me some work. I'm kind of biting the world's collective ankle right now.

2439:

it not being as hard to get rid of "badmins". Our only process now is ArbCom, and it's nearly impossible to invoke successfully except against an admin so off the rails ArbCom has no choice but to act or face censure from the community. Another positive effect of such an annual reconfirmation

1654:

You have also described MOSMATH as a "fork", but MOSMATH predates most of the rest of the MOS, and the guidance about how to indent mathematical formulas is very well established (since 2002). So there does not seem to be any "forking" going on with the page. Moreover, I f there were a CONLEVEL

1650:

the Knowledge (XXG) style to say that colons cannot be used (as was done for block quotes, but not for other indented content, in the past). That position was rejected in the RFC. And so there is still no conflict: no other MOS page says not to use colons for mathematical, chemical, or other

2873:

work to the winds. Probably for 5+ years, ha ha. MoS is actually getting close to feature-complete (finally!) for WP purposes, so within another couple of years, this might actually be feasible. The rest of the P&G seem pretty stable, other than a pair of related problems I've identified

2421:

Glad you brought this stuff up. Adminship's always been a for-life appointment, other than we've belatedly instituted inactive-admin auto-desysopping, for security reasons, and of course bad-acting admins can be removed, like judges who break the law. The community treating the position like

2340:

I saw your note in the now-closed RFA, and I'm entirely puzzled: That DRV is still open with a day or two to go, and so the fact that the article hasn't been restored really doesn't say anything--and if you read the rest of the DRV, it certainly says that a lot of non-inclusionist admins also

1645:

But the main reason I wanted to write is about the framing of the closed RFC. From my perspective, no MOS page has ever said that colons cannot be used for indenting displayed mathematical formulas. This is, undoubtedly, why featured articles continue to use colons. So I see no actual CONLEVEL

1470:

focus on genetically engineered artificial life, not mechanical. I.e., they were grown in a lab, not built in a shop. So, depending on your definitions, the films either are not about robots at all, or are a "re-imagining" of and a continuation of robot-themed fiction into the era of genetic

1775:

No one said anything about whether you understand how to generate HTML. It's as if you just don't give a damn whether the HTML generated is valid, conformant, and accessible, versus just expedient to generate with shortcuts like ":" even if it's wrong. "As long as it looks okay to me with my

1285:

will be reported if I break any rules. (I normally write Palestinian history, which means that......not everybody loves me, put it that way. The threshold of reporting me to the dramah boards is rather low, Ive been reported twice just this last half year, for basically misreading things, see

1771:

beginning and end tags. If it's still not clear, let me try this analogy: If your city statutes prohibit hunting animals within the city limits, you don't get a free pass to go around shotgunning rats just because you know a whole lot about rats and how to hunt them. Not even if you're sure

2399:

Wow, thanks for a fully detailed rationale, which is more explanation than I expected or I think you owe. I just wanted to point out something... and I find I agree with you on all of these points. A year isn't too much, when we're now treating admins as U.S. Federal judges, with for-life

2435:

actually reduce the "adminship is a super-mega-huge deal" perception, for the reason you gave and an additional one: If we were pass-or-failing people (mostly passing them) every week, then new candidates would be subject to less of a hostile gauntlet, out of the process being more routine

1642:

knowledgeable group on the wiki about the actual styles used in mathematics articles, and members of the project have long collaborated on that page for the benefit of the wiki. It would be absurd not to point them to potential changes that would affect thousands of mathematics articles.

1658:

I can also point out that I'm quite knowledgeable about HTML and programming. I have edited the Mediawiki source for my local installs and I wrote the WP 1.0 bot including its web interface. Our disagreements are not based on technical misunderstandings about how to generate HTML. — Carl

478:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3592:

grounds. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't need more articles on people who aren't actually important but are just having their "15 minutes of fame" because they're pretty or got on TV a couple of times. This one has a lot of sources cited, but a lot of them are trivial, passing mentions, not

1471:

engineering, much as biological zombie and vampire fiction, in which those conditions are viruses, are a bio-era outgrowth of older genres about them as undead spirits. I don't know if our articles on the films really get into this sort of thing, but there are numerous books in the

2868:

This is why wikifriends drop by and have a hearty chuckle when someone posts on my talk page that I should run for RfA. (All the MoS drama, plus I'm not always Mr. Sweetness and Light, and I'm also wordy on talk pages.) To pass RfA, I might have to abandon MoS and most other

4061:

The overwhelmingly most common practice in mainspace is to include anchors below headings, not inside them, to avoid confusing new editors with mangled edit summaries. Prefer below the heading by default, as least likely to be problematic, but do not editwar over different

387: 3780:

doesn't really belong and should be saved for another work. Even for short stuff this works well; I use the technique a lot when writing essays and guideline drafts and other WP-internal material. (It really shows when I don't and just do a brain dump, as I did at

3743:

Ahh, I know what you mean. I need to get around to writing a book at some point... I've got a million ideas in my mind but always get stuck after writing 10-20k words. Guess my head's still too used to academic paper writing, lol. Any recommended reading or advice?

739:

thread) you are adding material without providing reliable sources, then you can expect people to remove it, since reliable sourcing is required; this isn't a blog. Not sure what else to tell you. I don't see an extant dispute for me to attempt to mediate, at any

3767:

Not right off-hand, for writer's block (I have the opposite problem), though just searching that on Amazon and looking for four- and five-star results, from real publishers, is probably a good bet. For writing in general, one of my faves is Stephen Pinker's

389:, so it would be lowercase anyway. If there were concrete proof it originated as an acronym, the argument could be made, but I think it would fail, because no one presently seems to interpret it as an acronym, and it's not styled as one even in sources 2789:

Thanks for looking into it. :-) I would probably care less about something like an article on the ℞ symbol or whatever, but this is basic punctuation, and oft-used by Wikipedians directly, so not losing any "how do I do this?" info was important. :-)

1680:

How old the wikiproject is, and how much people like it, and whether the people in it are smart and edit in good faith (of course they are and do) has nothing to do with whether it's narrowly topical compared to VPTECH, which is the only comparison I

2400:

appointments. If I ever run for RFA again (which I have toyed with, but don't have enough time to invest for it to be worth the hassle, and I'm pretty sure some folks are still mad at me 5 years after I got voted off ArbCom), I would run with the

2618:. When I wrote that page a few years ago, I never dreamed of the tens of thousands of hits it would get and become the default advice for RFA candidates. It's nice to know that someone is watching over it and making useful improvements. 3238:

admin actions (or admin actions in furtherance of paid editing). See also RfC at VPPOL; you're basically the test case, and there could have been a test case that was far more egregious, but you happened to be in the place at the time.

196: 188: 679:

Thank you for looking at it, few people seems to control what content they like and dislike, regardless of facts. If one in not good enough but other of same type is allowed to remain then there is a problem. Please see what you can

1646:

disagreement. By claiming there is a disagreement, I believe you were saying that there is another MOS page which says colons cannot be used. I don't see any page that says so, so I interpreted the RFC as saying that you wanted to

1493:), though not every bit of them is great. PS: Even in Philip K. Dick's original 1968 novel, which was about "androids", they had a biological as well as mechanical component, so that wasn't new to the film, just turned up a notch. 2008:

A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak'

3829:

This is all very helpful. I appreciate it! One of the long-shelved projects I think I'm going to seriously push on this coming year is a legal treatise. So that ought to be fun. Good luck if you decide to work on a book yourself!

3772:; he's not a just a linguist and a very well-regarded nonfiction writer, he's also a cognitive scientist, so he really knows his stuff. That said, I would have preferred he did an introductory and an advanced volume back to back; 3422:

and most other mainstream style guides, and find opposed in virtually no style guides other than those for news journalism, the primary edict of which is to shorten content as much as possible to save newsprint space. So, see

4232:

So is there a magic way in Template:/doc space of turning the text color=red, in a way that is not overwritten? It has beaten me today. I can see multiple uses if we had a simple negative template for false code blocks.

3405:

policy, all editors have a right to make good faith edits. "I don't agree" or "I don't understand" without an actual facts-, policy-, or source-based rationale is not a valid reason to thwart constructive edits; see

768:

It's not as simple as that, I have removed stuff that has no reliable source however the page was reverted to source less page. not to worry, thanks for at least looking into the matter. Good luck with the election.

3716:

Thanks, and you too! Here in Cali, the weather's actually pretty nice. If I had any sense, I would give up this hobby and write another book or ten, but it's hard to stay away more than a couple of months at most.

2418:

I'm a chatty cathy about internal stuff. :-) And I'm not perturbed in any way by people challenging what I say at RfA (or elsewhere); I just may argue a bit for my position if I thought about it hard before posting

506: 184: 4262:

much, specifically because they interfere with tweaking the displayed output – they're a rather blunt instrument. I guess I need to be sure what your intent is. My usual approach to this sort of thing is to use

182:

You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at

1864:

No one can be punished for or utterly prohibited from doing anything by any guideline, so this whole "cannot" and "says they can" stuff is entirely off-topic. The indentation-related material at the main MoS is

1858:

accessible solution. This is a matter that has nothing to do with maths but to do with accessible page layout and standards-conformant markup in general. This is about a conflict in guideline wording and about

1557:

I'd opened the RfC because I could see it was turning into a mess, that might not even be resolved to making it a full RM; the anon was going on about numerous other articles with the same doubly-wrong pattern.

4602:

page between the queues and the preps is suddenly no longer collapsing, nor even offering the option to collapse/show. When I took a look to see what might be causing it, the only thing that caught my eye was

4227:!{{anchor|Foo1}} |A header cell !style="background:white;" {{anchor|Foo2}} |A header cell with styling |{{anchor|Foo3}} |A data cell |rowspan=2 {{anchor|Foo4}} |A data cell spanning two rows</source: --> 4128:

false code, but use of colour (displaying the illicit code in red) or putting the whole lot in the second column of a two column table- and 'Don't go here' icon in the first, would signal the difference. --

2881:

consider RfA again if I had something like 4 nominators who were all active, long-term, not-too-controversial admins. And after I came up with something I want to work on a lot that requires admin tools.

2549:

Kostas wasn't telling you that a ping you made had failed, rather that a ping by Zero aimed at you had done so, in case you cared. Cool if you don't, but still neighbourly of Kostas to let you know... --

4542:

Sounds reasonable. I'll let Jo-Jo continue to take the lead on this. I've had F-all luck getting any traction of any kind on DS reform for something like 4 years now. I know when to take a back seat.

1220:: did editor C break the rules' according to Version 2, or not? (I have no intention of reporting anyone, but I really need to know,....or I will be reported next, if I have gotten it wrong.) Thanks, 3374:

You should probably look for consensus for the change. Not mandatory, but probably best. I don't see consistent use of Oxford commas on the page, and it's not at all confusing in the heading. Cheers.

490:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4364: 3777:

adverb). I have a bunch of other "how to write well" books, but few of them have stuck out in my mind. There are a lot of genre/topical ones, though. I guess it depends on what you want to write.

1213: 250: 1002:

It's weird; still working on it. I went with the name on their own website, which is also dominant in the French press. The election article had a template call in it, but I find no template.

1836:

issue in the RFC. The deeper issue here is not CONLEVEL, in my opinion, the issue is that other MOS pages might be misread to suggest that colons cannot be used to indent formulas. — Carl

980:

symbol, then I assumed that the S should stay lower-case. Of course, it never occured to anyone that in fact that was never under the correct bloomign name in the first place! :D Cheers,

3692:

Hope all's well with you and yours, and you're enjoying a relaxing weekend by your choice of heating source. Looking forward to continuing to see your good works in the coming year! —/

2042:

candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.

4968: 2072: 4857:

and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records.

2763:

Probably in the new year, I plan to add a hatnote to the effect that additional techniques are available using the Unicode values 2013 and 2014, refering the user to the article

2690:

Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free and you not often get distracted by dice-playing.

2826:

is waiting for you. I think third time will be lucky, and then either next year or the year after you'll be voted onto the Committee. Anyway, best wishes, whatever you decide.

3326:

Mac, but just wishing you all the best for the holidays and the new year, and thanking you for all you do. It's probably a lot warmer where I am than where you are 😎

1873:

block quotations; it's right there in plain English. The material at MOS:ACCESS on colon-indents being a poor idea for specific reasons has nothing to do with maths or quotes

1323:

Only ArbCom can give you one. Only the current ArbCom members can determine which interpretation prevails (or, technically, they could refuse to decide and leave it up to

2301: 1877:

but all indented content. The "use a colon to indent" idea you like at MOS:MATHS has nothing to do with maths, but about content behing shifted visually to the right.

2027: 2404:

of yearly reelection. That is, I think the best way out of RfA being too big a deal is the ending of "well, now I'm an admin, now I can show my true colors" problem.

143: 109: 1784:

for visual indentation does not produce good results, any more than using White Out on your teeth to make them look clean from a distance is an actual tooth cleaning.

2822:

Sorry you just didn't make it. It looks like you got enough support (more than four who got in), but you had a few people opposing just because you aren't an admin.

278:! PS: I really didn't do much on the Ouschan article, though the Spinks one is about 95% my work. Some non-trivial articles I created (not from splits/mergers) are 1677:

That's a lot of mostly unrelated stuff to cover. I'm just going to listify these points for expediency (and if I seem angry in any of it, be assured that I'm not):

4893: 4866: 1759:

doesn't apply to them and topics they think they "owns" and thus they can go bold-face and ALL-CAPS and turn purple all the names of all superheroes in articles.

1362:: as of this moment, you can continue as normal. If this widespread insanity actually results in a rule change to version 2, then you can really start to worry. 3389:

I already opened a talk page thread about this (showing serial comma use on that page, which you can find in a few seconds with an in-page search on the string

2852:

I'm also sure I got lots of downvotes because I'm the primary steward of MoS for the last several years, and heavily involved in it since at least 2008 (and in

4841:

for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

246: 200: 4518:

for the committee to review. I suggest WT:AE first as I think it's reasonably likely that the committee will want to hear from them before making a decision.

1755:

against the accessibility MoS page about an accessibility matter, which is not a maths matter. It's no different from, say, WikiProject Comics deciding the

2199: 2055: 335:. Something in the system just partial-credited me with the Ouschan GA, probably based on number of edits or something, but it was mostly cleanup work. 1066:

Great stuff, yes looks much better. Thanks for sorting it- I agree that after all that, nothing less than RM will suffice for yet another move! cheers,

4029: 1100: 1074: 988: 957: 298: 3048: 3018: 2986: 2756:. I do find that, while I didn't leave anything substantial out, there are a few details that I deleted; I have now restored them to the section 1483: 1454:

at the end), and new posts go at the bottom (took me a while to get used to that, too). We have robots today, so there are surely robots in the

615:

He is just removing what he does not like, stating "Reverted to last better version" even facts are removed just because he does not like them.

4874: 4221:

Thanks for that- it will be copied over to my user/sandwardrobe. In the Tenplate:anchor/doc under discussion- the offending code appears to be:

4288:

work within the code example). Regardless what approach you use, the main thing to remember is CSS cascading order; if you do something like

3574: 2195: 1762:

You keep recycling this argument that it's about "how to format mathematical formulas". It's not. It has to do with how to indent content of

4683: 3969: 3597:. Even if this person is genuinely notable, I've sworn off working on "minor celebrity" bios, as a poor use of my (or anyone else's) time. 3014: 2124: 1612: 1183: 554: 139: 2865:

article control). Every time one of these people doesn't get their way in some trivial style dispute, I get on their long-term "dirt list".

2325: 520: 2823: 3060: 3044: 1878: 1089: 946: 1715:

to support an indentation system within that x-tag, that's fine and dandy, but has jack to do with whether we should continue abusing

4834: 4809: 4607:. Can you please check to see whether your change has broken the "collapse top" template, and if so, please fix things? Many thanks. 1532: 4783: 4747: 4637: 4553: 4501: 4469: 4441: 4417: 4380: 4342: 4206: 4102: 4043: 3922: 3801: 3728: 3663: 3608: 3527: 3476: 3442: 3353: 3301: 3249: 3147: 3076: 2962: 2893: 2801: 2718: 2647: 2579: 2534: 2456: 2383: 1908: 1811: 1719:

list markup for visual layout. It's essentially the same debate as the ancient one about misuse of tables for webpage design layout.

1569: 1504: 1388: 1369: 1343: 1258: 1129: 1051: 1013: 906: 846: 814: 752: 664: 441: 404: 346: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 4870: 2244: 2672: 4002:

still have the anchors placed inside the section heading. I think this needs to be sorted out once and for all. A New Year task?

1966:

pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.

784: 701: 635: 325: 2185: 1787:

Finally, Accessible talk pages are a lost cause until we have better software for discussions. Accessible markup in articles is

4900: 4529: 2321: 1853:

This isn't about whether anyone "can" use colons to indent (you "can" use any markup you can think of to do that, while others

1542:. You've just complicated matters further. We need to unwind some stuff, then we can worry about what the better titles are. 1432: 516: 302: 499: 4371:

non-minor one) to it the bot informs them of the presence of sanctions if they are otherwise eligible for such notification.

3842: 3756: 3704: 720: 4664: 3950: 3557: 2995: 2156: 2105: 1776:

eyesight on my browser, that's good enough" is the message you're sending. I don't read minds, so I have no idea what your

1244: 1164: 930: 586: 118: 3342:(which was certainly not true even for him, having lived in New York; the winters there are about as tough as in Ontario). 1287: 4272:

to create line breaks within the code block (turning off nowiki as needed to make that happen, and to make templates like

1107: 1081: 995: 964: 4838: 2934: 2317: 2128: 2096: 3871: 1738:

I did not describe MOSMATH as a fork of anything. I described – entirely correctly – something happening at MOSMATH as

876:

Changing data in an infobox resulted in the deletion of spacing. Someone was even implying that I was a vandal. Take a

4687: 4655: 4599: 1539: 653:

I suppose I can look at it, as a random editor, but I have no experience with the topic, and am not an administrator.

511: 3499: 3379: 4850:

Dear members of WikiProject Genealogy, this will be the last newsletter for 2017, but maybe the most important one!

4268:. This gets rid of the annoying rightward indentation at the start of the code material, and then one can just use 1289: 3892: 3114:

Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~

2519:

I didn't try to ping Zero0000, I just mentioned the editor in passing (albeit misspelled as "Zero000"). Kind of a

736: 38: 4722: 2173: 4814: 3418:, and find something better to do that edit-war against highly standardized use of commas, which you'll find in 2857:

with a "wikipolitical" power struggle component (against centralization and broad input, in favor of localized

2181: 1975:

and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

1731: 1701:

list markup it would probably take years to implement (though of course it will never be a policy-level matter).

735:. I don't see any open threads on the talk page in which you're involved. If (as seems to be indicated at the 3578: 2772: 1217: 1093: 1067: 1030: 981: 950: 4715:

user quotes, this should be on it. Whatever you had for dinner the night you wrote that, have it more often.

4451: 3789:

it is the text-wall wreck that it is, even if the reasoning underlying it has proven essentially irrefutable).

487: 4940:

The backlog drive will begin on January 1 and run until January 29. Prize tiers and other info can be found

4497: 4437: 4376: 4068: 4007: 2946: 2926: 3589: 3407: 3287: 2841:

Thanks! And, yeah, I thought it was funny that I missed it by less than 3%. It's okay. I was looking to

2189: 1739: 1727: 1420: 772: 689: 623: 4976: 3685: 3510: 3495: 3459: 3375: 2082: 263: 3411: 2776: 2615: 1854: 4780: 4744: 4634: 4612: 4550: 4533: 4466: 4414: 4339: 4203: 4190:, especially if the code in question is outright invalid or malfunctional (that template uses re-styled 4099: 4040: 3919: 3798: 3725: 3660: 3605: 3524: 3473: 3439: 3350: 3298: 3246: 3144: 3119: 3073: 2959: 2890: 2798: 2715: 2644: 2576: 2531: 2509: 2453: 2380: 1905: 1808: 1742:: the "I don't understand, I'm lazy, I don't like change, or this is my page anyway"-style reverting at 1566: 1501: 1385: 1366: 1340: 1298:

on how Version 2 is to be understood, and I really need a clear answer to which one of us is correct.

1255: 1126: 1048: 1010: 976:

that turned out to be! Thanks for sorting it though; I did originally move it to the diacriticless-page

903: 843: 830: 811: 749: 661: 438: 401: 371:

came from the network's original owner, Taj Entertainment Network, not because it is/was on channel 10.

343: 208: 47: 17: 4941: 4402: 4025: 1859: 1723: 4937:

by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

3710: 4962:. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing. 4933: 4238: 4133: 2172:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1971: 1962: 780: 697: 631: 558: 533: 4511: 3402: 2858: 2039: 1445: 1424: 474: 372: 4525: 4405:

or whatever needs to also re-design the template to look less like a "go F yourself" message. : -->

3831: 3745: 3693: 3635: 3275: 3214: 2784: 2768: 1991: 1428: 1187: 1155: 885: 4331:. Various MoS pages have errors of this sort in them; I've been fixing them as I run across them. 2870: 2862: 483: 4493: 4433: 4392: 4372: 4079: 4064: 4019: 4003: 3973: 3941: 3548: 2916: 2831: 2695: 2409: 2346: 2050:

can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.

1547: 306: 187:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 4432:

Now we would need to get it proposed somewhere where AE active admins and arbitrators see it...

2423: 2030:

has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer

1705: 800: 715:

after them). I wouldn't mind looking like Downey! Someone the other day said I look more like

605: 231: 4865:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from

4032:

supplement essay, I've laid out the nature of the dispute, in the "Links and anchors" section.

2925:

I don't know if I'm active enough as an admin, but give me a shout if you'd like a nomination.

2053:

To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to

4972: 4917: 4698: 3984: 3331: 3029: 2623: 2215: 2139: 2078: 1946: 1627: 1466: 1198: 569: 259: 242: 154: 4515: 4455: 3415: 2520: 2501: 2035: 1689:

markup when we have alternatives now and the problems with the old markup are now well-known.

1329: 796: 495: 4775: 4739: 4629: 4608: 4545: 4461: 4409: 4334: 4198: 4094: 4035: 3914: 3793: 3720: 3655: 3600: 3519: 3468: 3434: 3345: 3293: 3241: 3139: 3115: 3101: 3068: 2954: 2885: 2793: 2710: 2639: 2608: 2571: 2563: 2551: 2526: 2505: 2448: 2375: 1900: 1803: 1708:

and code maintainability matter, a meta-level above the topic of the content being indented.

1561: 1496: 1380: 1363: 1335: 1318: 1303: 1250: 1225: 1121: 1043: 1005: 898: 838: 806: 744: 656: 433: 396: 338: 283: 204: 3883:

Wishing you all the best for 2018 — good health, sufficient wealth, peace and contentment

3781: 3594: 3428: 3424: 3398: 2364: 2031: 1747: 1604: 498:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 491: 310: 4980: 4793: 4757: 4730: 4702: 4647: 4616: 4563: 4537: 4505: 4479: 4445: 4427: 4384: 4352: 4249: 4242: 4234: 4216: 4166:. Which one works better depends on the surrounding markup. If the page is already using 4145: 4137: 4129: 4112: 4072: 4053: 4011: 3999: 3988: 3932: 3896: 3848: 3811: 3762: 3738: 3673: 3639: 3618: 3582: 3537: 3503: 3486: 3452: 3383: 3363: 3335: 3311: 3281: 3270: 3259: 3220: 3209: 3157: 3123: 3086: 3052: 3033: 2972: 2939: 2920: 2903: 2835: 2811: 2728: 2698: 2657: 2627: 2589: 2555: 2544: 2513: 2466: 2413: 2393: 2350: 2329: 2219: 2143: 2086: 1918: 1848: 1821: 1671: 1631: 1579: 1551: 1514: 1436: 1398: 1372: 1353: 1307: 1268: 1229: 1202: 1139: 1109: 1083: 1061: 1023: 997: 966: 916: 889: 856: 824: 788: 776: 762: 705: 693: 674: 648: 639: 627: 573: 524: 451: 414: 376: 356: 290: 267: 212: 158: 1324: 1115: 1037: 3494:

As for long commutes, I hear you. Have a wonderful Christmas and a fulfilling new year.

2192:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 1212:

Seeing that Kingsindian and myself understand Version 2 completely differently over at

4520: 4487: 3631: 881: 279: 238: 193:

Please add your evidence by December 15, 2017, which is when the evidence phase closes.

4736:

Guess I'd better stock up on chicken covered in extra-spicy barbecue sauce then. Heh.

4090:

headings, not inside them, to avoid confusing new editors with mangled edit summaries.

2853: 2161: 935: 4892:

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from

4291: 4275: 4177: 4153: 3043:

Infobox person. What was the final decision on merging these duplicate parameters? --

2912: 2827: 2764: 2691: 2497: 2405: 2358: 2342: 2206:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1843: 1726:

issues that are what the RfC was really about. Due to your misleading canvassing of

1666: 1543: 294: 3290:, even more of a snowball. Events are out of any individual control at this point. 3172: 1888:

do not absorb this, and want to recycle your "but maths ..." and "what I like isn't

895:

Argh. VE should just be taken offline until they fix its numerous severe problems.

245:, for service in 12 years, for thoughts about policy, style and consistency, for an 4694: 4283: 4185: 4161: 3980: 3327: 3025: 2619: 2211: 2207: 2135: 1831:

MOSMATH should "conform with current main-MoS and MOS:ACCESS advice" - but MOSMATH

1623: 1616: 1587: 1472: 1460: 1194: 716: 565: 313:, over what was originally a useless machine translation of the it.wikipedia stub: 150: 2295:

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

465: 4327: 4323: 4312: 923:

Bizarre symbols, got shot right of- couple of page moves though, sorry about that

197:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors/Workshop

189:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors/Evidence

4326: 4314: 4169: 3588:

Sorry, but this is the kind of article I'm most likely to try to get deleted on

1998:. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable. 1359: 1314: 1299: 1237: 1221: 618: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4226:

the following forms of cell are not valid:<source enclose=div lang=text: -->

1986:

If you know other editors with a good understanding of Knowledge (XXG) policy,

795:

to add unsourced material, etc. If it still keeps happening, you might to try

3562: 3133: 2682: 1869:

about block quotations (which auto-indent) but about how to indent everything

1751: 732: 332: 123: 4024:

Seems worth doing. There was disagreement about this stuff only last week at

3465:

Nothing personal. I need to go watch a comedy for half an hour or something.

2504:, but it failed due to a typo. You may wish to check the page. Best regards, 1766:

kind. Nothing anywhere in this debate has any effect on anything between the

4954:

The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

4769: 683:

off topic (remove if you want) you do look like the "iron man" downey jnr :)

383:

spelling, when Sony ("SONY") capitalize-like-crazy marketing isn't involved

4844:(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) 4303:

because the stylesheet stuff for the code element comes after that for the

3516:

one page, so it'll need to be tracked down if that version isn't retained.

619:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:ShotgunMavericks#Control_over_Kalki_Page

2341:

thought the A7 was improper. And... him invoking SNOW? Really? Cheers,

1485:. I have several of these books and some of them are quite good (I liked 973: 1839: 1756: 1743: 1662: 427: 423: 368: 4860:

And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2018!

1216:, could you please tell us what your opinion is, about the situation on 502:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

185:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors

3223:, humbled but optimistic about the upcoming year of renewal and growth! 2363:

ah I had not noticed the DRV was still open. I tend to agree with the

3684: 2255: 1735:

pay attention to what it said rather than what you told them it said.

1036:

newspaper articles. If people want to move it again, I suggest using

4510:

I'd suggest probably taking two steps, the first by proposing it at

4915:

Hello SMcCandlish, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

1944:

Hello SMcCandlish, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

728: 4854: 4598:

SMcCandlish, the collapsible (and collapsed) instructions on the

3784:; at least 50% of that needs to be cut out.) I recently started 1533:

WP:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Russian railway line article titles

4883: 2757: 2753: 2736: 2177: 1780:

is. I don't work in intent, I work in actual results. Abusing

1214:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment

1040:

and making sure we arrive at the a name that will stick! :-)

505:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

4772:

is badass. Over 100 now, and still gets albums in the charts.

3630:

general that I would like to hear your insight). Best wishes,

25: 4853:

You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at

4833:

This is the fifth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in

4307:

template. Same goes for links; if you want to something like

1697:

mandated use of accessible code for this instead of abuse of

877: 4916: 3645:

I'm surprised things came so close, and I actually had more

3171: 2254: 1945: 4931:

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the

4311:

you end up with link coloration marring the green example:

3065:

I don't recall; it's been flushed from my FIFO buffer. :-)

393:

independent of the subject but pre-dating Sony's takeover.

3907:

Rwy'n gobeithio y byddwch yn cael tymor gwyliau da, hefyd.

3491:

Not a problem. Thanks for the explanation. It makes sense.

3268:-- spot on man, sounds like the title of my biography. :p 3132:

Thanks, you too! Remember: Time flies like an arrow, but

1711:

If the maths people want to get the MW developers to hack

604:

to the extent there's much to do but remind people of the

4365:

User:SMcCandlish/Discretionary sanctions/2013–2015 review

2046: 1603:

I'm the one who opened that RfC in the first place. Wish

2422:

something super-serious is ArbCom's doing, by inventing

4604: 2176:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 486:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

329: 322: 320: 318: 316: 314: 287: 249:, - Stanton, cat lover in four dimensions, you are an 195:

You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,

1722:

Maths concerns are also completely irrelevant to the

4951:

The total number of reviews completed for the month.

2824:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/SMcCandlish 3

2752:

As you requested, I have double-checked my edits at

579:

Kalki Page and over control by User ShotgunMavericks

4881:Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator 3370:

accessibility guidelines headings and serial commas

725:. I definitely don't have his sneery smile, though. 712: 422:not an acronym; it's the sister station/network of 3188:SMcCandlish, please accept these holiday wishes :) 1281:to know, as I know with about 100% certainty that 835:This conversation probably interests you as well. 4947:Awards will be given in tiers in two categories: 4084:Could compress it even more for real MoS usage: 2320:on behalf of The Knowledge (XXG) Library team -- 2264: 2149:Disambiguation link notification for December 14 2012:Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, 1791:a lost cause. We have template replacements for 201:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 146:Talk:Current members of the United States Senate 110:Talk:Current members of the United States Senate 2241: 2056:Knowledge (XXG) talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers 1746:to prevent it from being updated to agree with 1294:As it is, at the moment, Kingindian and I have 4967:If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go 3401:, if you're going to take the BRD route. Per 2071:If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go 199:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 4855:https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/Main_Page 4799:WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.5 -2017 4174:-family templates to mark up examples, I use 2560:Ah! I get it. I have the page watchlisted. 1795:that not only work great, they actually work 273: 8: 2014:please do not sacrifice quality for quantity 1458:fictional universe. However, The stories in 4454:, but this might actually require a formal 3905: 2287:Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia 4926:Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive! 3266:happened to be in the place at the time. 2229: 1932: 1479:in detail. Try an Amazon books search on 1418: 1377:The version 3 compromise looks promising. 770: 687: 621: 4182:, but an isolated case might better with 4030:User:SMcCandlish/Manual of Style/Internal 3652:Anyway, I'll be happy to help how I can. 299:Valley National 8-Ball League Association 178:Noted; I think I'm done commenting there. 4958:NOTE: It is extremely important that we 3021:Talk:LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987) 2987:Talk:LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987) 2670: 1491:Future Noir: The Making of Blade Runner 1417:can u tell me if it has robots though 1413:sorry i edited the blade runner article 237:Thank you for quality articles such as 4875:Category:Opted-out of message delivery 4626:when adding a parameter alias. Derp. 4514:for AE regulars to review and then at 4150:Yes, we have templates for that, e.g. 4085: 4060: 3998:The examples in the documentation for 3265: 3164:And olive branch & holiday wishes! 1277:intention of reporting anyone, BUT: I 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4835:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Genealogy 4622:Repaired. I'd forgotten the closing 1960:The new page backlog is currently at 1540:User_talk:Anthony_Appleyard#Mis-moved 7: 4580:Recent edit to collapse top template 3573:Help expand this article. Thank you! 2911:Well, good luck on whatever you do. 475:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 4869:or alternatively to opt-out of all 4298:, the result will look the same as 4269: 4259: 4255: 4191: 2614:Thank you for your recent edits to 2568:, I do appreciate the effort. :-) 1767: 1716: 1712: 1698: 488:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 4318:. This actually has to be done as 2272:Issue 25, October – November 2017 2240: 472:Hello, SMcCandlish. Voting in the 459:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 164:Mister wiki case has been accepted 24: 4807:Newsletter Nr 5, 2017-12-30, for 4764:Somebody here remembers Vera Lynn 367:You know what, the "TEN" part of 203:. For the Arbitration Committee, 4911:New Years new page backlog drive 4820: 4669: 4662: 4585: 3955: 3948: 3870: 3561: 3555: 3100: 3000: 2993: 2743: 2671: 2607: 2483: 2243: 2160: 2154: 2110: 2103: 1607:was smart enough to detect that. 1594: 1526: 1169: 1162: 934: 928: 591: 584: 540: 464: 326:Crystalate Manufacturing Company 230: 169: 122: 116: 29: 4847:A demo wiki is up and running! 4686:is asking for participation in 3972:is asking for participation in 3180: 3167: 3017:is asking for participation in 2127:is asking for participation in 1972:backlog stretches back to March 1615:is asking for participation in 1475:vein that analyze the original 1186:is asking for participation in 612:Can you please look into this? 557:is asking for participation in 509:and submit your choices on the 303:IBSF World Snooker Championship 142:is asking for participation in 4086:In mainspace, include anchors 3397:should have opened the "D" in 3061:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 2003:New Year New Page Review Drive 1: 4981:20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) 4794:07:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC) 4773: 4758:13:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC) 4737: 4731:10:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC) 4703:04:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC) 4663: 4648:23:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4627: 4617:22:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4564:06:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC) 4543: 4538:06:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC) 4506:12:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC) 4480:23:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4459: 4446:23:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4428:22:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4407: 4385:22:47, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4353:22:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4332: 4243:14:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4217:02:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4196: 4138:13:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC) 4113:22:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4092: 4073:07:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4054:02:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 4033: 4012:09:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC) 3989:04:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC) 3949: 3933:22:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC) 3912: 3897:19:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC) 3849:13:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC) 3812:22:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC) 3791: 3763:22:14, 23 December 2017 (UTC) 3739:22:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC) 3718: 3711:21:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC) 3674:15:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 3653: 3640:09:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 3619:04:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 3598: 3583:03:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 3556: 3538:04:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 3517: 3504:04:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 3487:03:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 3466: 3453:03:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 3432: 3384:22:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3364:18:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3343: 3336:09:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3312:19:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3291: 3282:19:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3260:19:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3239: 3221:03:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3158:18:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3137: 3124:00:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 3087:22:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 3066: 3053:21:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 3034:04:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 2994: 2952: 2921:14:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 2904:01:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 2883: 2836:22:19, 19 December 2017 (UTC) 2812:22:59, 17 December 2017 (UTC) 2791: 2777:22:51, 17 December 2017 (UTC) 2758:Rendering dashes on computers 2729:15:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC) 2708: 2699:14:03, 17 December 2017 (UTC) 2658:10:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC) 2637: 2628:10:14, 17 December 2017 (UTC) 2590:10:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC) 2569: 2556:09:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC) 2545:13:33, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2524: 2514:11:58, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2467:18:33, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2446: 2414:17:54, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2394:16:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2373: 2351:06:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2330:18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC) 2220:18:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 2155: 2144:04:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC) 2104: 2087:20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 2059:and add it to your watchlist. 1919:05:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC) 1898: 1849:22:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 1822:19:32, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 1801: 1672:18:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 1632:04:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC) 1580:02:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC) 1559: 1515:10:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC) 1494: 1437:08:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC) 1399:19:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 1378: 1373:06:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC) 1354:06:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC) 1333: 1308:20:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC) 1269:02:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC) 1248: 1163: 1119: 1041: 1003: 929: 896: 836: 804: 742: 654: 585: 431: 394: 336: 117: 4688:this request for comment on 3974:this request for comment on 3019:this request for comment on 2734: 2131:Talk:List of areas of London 2129:this request for comment on 2097:Talk:List of areas of London 1928:New Page Reviewer Newsletter 1617:this request for comment on 1552:04:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC) 1450:Please sign your posts (put 1230:20:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC) 1203:04:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 1188:this request for comment on 1140:08:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC) 1110:07:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC) 1084:12:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 1062:12:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 1024:12:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 998:12:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 967:11:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 917:07:44, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 890:21:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC) 857:12:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 825:10:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 789:10:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 763:07:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 711:Please sign your posts (add 706:10:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 675:10:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 640:10:22, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 574:04:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 559:this request for comment on 525:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 452:10:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 415:14:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 377:14:36, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 357:00:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC) 268:22:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC) 247:initiative for clarification 213:21:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC) 159:04:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC) 144:this request for comment on 4815:Wikimedia genealogy project 4690:Talk:Bosnian pyramid claims 4656:Talk:Bosnian pyramid claims 4600:Template:Did you know/Queue 3420:The Chicago Manual of Style 2973:00:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 2940:17:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC) 2249:The Knowledge (XXG) Library 1296:completely opposite opinion 1088:I'm afraid, though, that I 4998: 4960:focus on quality reviewing 4901:MediaWiki message delivery 4660: 4583: 4123:Code-example markup tricks 3946: 3553: 2991: 2741: 2636:{burp} Thankee verr mush! 2481: 2322:MediaWiki message delivery 2318:MediaWiki message delivery 2225:Books and Bytes - Issue 25 2152: 2101: 1896:text to images, and so on. 1592: 1524: 1160: 947:Génération·s, le mouvement 926: 737:User talk:ShotgunMavericks 582: 538: 517:MediaWiki message delivery 167: 114: 4301:Bad example</code: --> 4295:Bad example</code: --> 3880:Compliments of the season 3876: 3869: 3680: 3099: 2677: 1994:on their talk page with: 1879:WP:Writing policy is hard 1487:Retrofitting Blade Runner 872:Visual editor infobox bug 727:Anyway, I'm looking over 4899:Newsletter delivered by 4684:feedback request service 4260:<syntaxhighlight: --> 3970:feedback request service 3039:Education vs. alma mater 3015:feedback request service 2478:Failed ping notification 2302:Read the full newsletter 2174:Jimmy White's 2: Cueball 2125:feedback request service 1980:Outreach and Invitations 1613:feedback request service 1273:Well, to repeat: I have 1218:Mausoleum of Abu Huraira 1184:feedback request service 555:feedback request service 140:feedback request service 4877:to your user talk page. 4363:A suggestion regarding 2424:discretionary sanctions 1988:invite them to join NPP 1114:Derp. I opened a full 4934:New Pages Feed backlog 4921: 4401:, though someone from 4229: 3994:Anchor placement again 3906: 3689: 3176: 2284:Global branches update 2278:OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref 2259: 2021:General project update 1950: 274: 225:four dimensions player 4920: 4810:WikiProject Genealogy 4320:{{xt|Example text}} ] 4309:{{xt|Example text ]}} 4224: 3893:Gareth Griffith‑Jones 3862:Heddwch ac ewyllys da 3688: 3286:Oh, and a new RfC at 3175: 2861:or individual-author 2258: 1949: 606:core content policies 484:Arbitration Committee 328:, and a TNT rewrite 42:of past discussions. 18:User talk:SMcCandlish 4871:massmessage mailings 4492:knows where to ask. 3322:No fancy template... 2735:I think I'm OK with 2707:Donkey shins! :-) 2208:opt-out instructions 1996:{{subst:NPR invite}} 1245:WP:THEREISNODEADLINE 686:(no offense meant.) 2496:You have pinged by 2444:popularity contest. 2336:Power~Enwiki at DRV 2186:fix with Dab solver 1992:invitation template 1855:definitely also can 1521:Making matter worse 1190:Talk:Flag of Turkey 1156:Talk:Flag of Turkey 1031:Serial Number 54129 4922: 4837:, to everyone who 4654:Please comment on 4397:That would help a 3976:Talk:Meghan Markle 3942:Talk:Meghan Markle 3940:Please comment on 3786:How to Write Short 3770:The Sense of Style 3690: 3681:Season's Greetings 3625:Seasonal greetings 3549:Maureen Wroblewitz 3177: 2985:Please comment on 2947:Fences and windows 2260: 2198:• Join us at the 2188:). Such links are 2095:Please comment on 1951: 1586:Please comment on 1154:Please comment on 532:Please comment on 500:arbitration policy 307:Five-pin billiards 251:awesome Wikipedian 108:Please comment on 4983: 4908: 4907: 4903: 4729: 4266:...</code: --> 3935: 3902: 3901: 3845: 3837: 3759: 3751: 3707: 3699: 3595:in-depth coverage 3234: 3233: 3129: 3128: 2704: 2703: 2664:Happy Saturnalia! 2633: 2632: 2332: 2312: 2311: 2281:User Group update 2267:Books & Bytes 2203: 2190:usually incorrect 2091: 2067: 2066: 1847: 1769:...</math: --> 1670: 1467:Blade Runner 2049 1439: 1423:comment added by 972:What an absolute 791: 775:comment added by 708: 692:comment added by 642: 626:comment added by 561:Talk:Sergio Verdú 534:Talk:Sergio Verdú 286:(over a redirect 243:William A. Spinks 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4989: 4966: 4894:our mailing list 4890: 4886: 4867:the mailing list 4824: 4823: 4818: 4803: 4802: 4792: 4756: 4727: 4725: 4721: 4720:White Whirlwind 4716: 4677: 4673: 4672: 4666: 4665: 4646: 4625: 4605:this edit by you 4595: 4589: 4588: 4562: 4491: 4478: 4426: 4396: 4351: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4297: 4287: 4279: 4271: 4267: 4261: 4257: 4253: 4215: 4194: 4193:...</del: --> 4189: 4181: 4173: 4165: 4157: 4149: 4111: 4083: 4052: 4023: 3963: 3959: 3958: 3952: 3951: 3931: 3910: 3909: 3874: 3867: 3866: 3841: 3835: 3810: 3755: 3749: 3737: 3703: 3697: 3672: 3617: 3565: 3559: 3558: 3536: 3514: 3485: 3463: 3451: 3392: 3362: 3310: 3280: 3278: 3273: 3272:Ben · Salvidrim! 3258: 3230: 3219: 3217: 3212: 3211:Ben · Salvidrim! 3168: 3156: 3104: 3097: 3096: 3085: 3064: 3008: 3004: 3003: 2997: 2996: 2971: 2950: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2902: 2810: 2788: 2747: 2746: 2727: 2675: 2668: 2667: 2656: 2611: 2604: 2603: 2588: 2567: 2554: 2543: 2493: 2487: 2486: 2465: 2392: 2362: 2315: 2270: 2247: 2234:Extended content 2230: 2193: 2182:check to confirm 2164: 2158: 2157: 2118: 2114: 2113: 2107: 2106: 2070: 1997: 1990:by dropping the 1937:Extended content 1933: 1917: 1895: 1837: 1820: 1794: 1783: 1770: 1740:WP:POLICYFORKing 1718: 1714: 1700: 1688: 1660: 1608: 1598: 1597: 1578: 1530: 1529: 1513: 1482: 1453: 1449: 1397: 1352: 1322: 1267: 1241: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1166: 1165: 1138: 1105: 1098: 1079: 1072: 1060: 1034: 1022: 993: 986: 962: 955: 938: 932: 931: 915: 855: 834: 831:ShotgunMavericks 823: 761: 714: 673: 652: 609: 599: 595: 594: 588: 587: 550: 549:Not a valid RfC. 544: 543: 468: 450: 420:really obviously 413: 355: 284:Turkmenian Kulan 277: 234: 179: 173: 172: 135: 126: 120: 119: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4997: 4996: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4928: 4913: 4904: 4882: 4839:voted a support 4825: 4821: 4806: 4801: 4790: 4766: 4754: 4723: 4719: 4718: 4712: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4670: 4668: 4659: 4644: 4623: 4596: 4593: 4591: 4586: 4582: 4560: 4485: 4476: 4424: 4390: 4368: 4349: 4319: 4308: 4304: 4299: 4289: 4281: 4273: 4264: 4256:<source: --> 4247: 4213: 4183: 4175: 4167: 4159: 4151: 4143: 4125: 4109: 4077: 4050: 4017: 4000:Template:Anchor 3996: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3956: 3954: 3945: 3929: 3865: 3846: 3808: 3760: 3735: 3708: 3683: 3670: 3627: 3615: 3575:171.248.249.168 3571: 3570: 3569: 3552: 3534: 3508: 3483: 3457: 3449: 3390: 3372: 3360: 3328:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3324: 3308: 3276: 3271: 3269: 3256: 3215: 3210: 3208: 3166: 3154: 3136:like a banana. 3095: 3083: 3058: 3041: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3001: 2999: 2990: 2969: 2944: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2900: 2820: 2808: 2782: 2750: 2749: 2744: 2740: 2725: 2666: 2654: 2620:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2602: 2600:A beer for you! 2586: 2561: 2550: 2541: 2494: 2492:Nothing to fix. 2491: 2489: 2484: 2480: 2463: 2390: 2356: 2338: 2313: 2308: 2307: 2305: 2274: 2261: 2252: 2235: 2227: 2200:DPL WikiProject 2170: 2169: 2168: 2151: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2111: 2109: 2100: 2068: 2063: 2047:The NPP Browser 1995: 1965: 1938: 1930: 1915: 1893: 1818: 1792: 1781: 1686: 1639: 1609: 1602: 1600: 1595: 1591: 1576: 1536: 1535: 1527: 1523: 1511: 1480: 1451: 1443: 1415: 1395: 1350: 1312: 1265: 1235: 1210: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1170: 1168: 1159: 1136: 1101: 1094: 1075: 1068: 1058: 1028: 1020: 989: 982: 958: 951: 944: 943: 942: 925: 913: 874: 853: 828: 821: 759: 671: 646: 610: 603: 601: 600: 592: 590: 581: 551: 548: 546: 541: 537: 529: 528: 469: 461: 448: 411: 365: 353: 309:(a progressive 291:Pool Hall Blues 256: 255: 235: 220: 180: 177: 175: 170: 166: 136: 134:Not interested. 133: 131: 130: 113: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4995: 4993: 4964: 4956: 4955: 4952: 4924: 4914: 4912: 4909: 4906: 4905: 4898: 4889: 4873:, you may add 4863: 4829:Participation: 4826: 4819: 4800: 4797: 4788: 4768:Note to self: 4765: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4752: 4711: 4706: 4667: 4661: 4658: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4642: 4584: 4581: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4558: 4474: 4422: 4400: 4367: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4347: 4294:|<code: --> 4230: 4222: 4211: 4124: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4107: 4089: 4048: 4028:. In my draft 3995: 3992: 3953: 3947: 3944: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3927: 3900: 3899: 3885: 3884: 3882: 3877: 3875: 3864: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3840: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3806: 3790: 3754: 3733: 3702: 3682: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3668: 3626: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3613: 3560: 3554: 3551: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3532: 3511:Walter Görlitz 3496:Walter Görlitz 3492: 3481: 3460:Walter Görlitz 3455: 3447: 3396: 3376:Walter Görlitz 3371: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3358: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3306: 3254: 3232: 3231: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3178: 3165: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3152: 3127: 3126: 3111: 3110: 3108:Happy Holidays 3105: 3094: 3093:Happy Holidays 3091: 3090: 3089: 3081: 3040: 3037: 2998: 2992: 2989: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2967: 2923: 2898: 2882: 2880: 2844: 2819: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2806: 2785:Peter M. Brown 2742: 2739: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2723: 2702: 2701: 2687: 2686: 2678: 2676: 2665: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2652: 2631: 2630: 2612: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2584: 2539: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2461: 2445: 2438: 2429: 2388: 2372: 2337: 2334: 2310: 2309: 2299: 2292: 2291: 2290:Bytes in brief 2288: 2285: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2262: 2253: 2237: 2236: 2233: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2159: 2153: 2150: 2147: 2108: 2102: 2099: 2093: 2065: 2064: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2051: 2043: 2018: 2017: 2010: 2000: 1999: 1977: 1976: 1969:Currently the 1967: 1961: 1954:Backlog update 1943: 1940: 1939: 1936: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1913: 1897: 1891: 1887: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1816: 1800: 1798: 1790: 1785: 1779: 1773: 1765: 1760: 1736: 1720: 1709: 1702: 1696: 1690: 1682: 1638: 1635: 1593: 1590: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1574: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1509: 1481:"Blade Runner" 1414: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1393: 1348: 1292: 1263: 1209: 1206: 1167: 1161: 1158: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1134: 1086: 1056: 1018: 933: 927: 924: 921: 920: 919: 911: 873: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 851: 819: 757: 741: 684: 681: 669: 589: 583: 580: 577: 539: 536: 530: 507:the candidates 470: 463: 462: 460: 457: 456: 455: 446: 421: 409: 392: 364: 361: 360: 359: 351: 280:Persian onager 239:Jasmin Ouschan 229: 227: 222: 221: 219: 216: 168: 165: 162: 121: 115: 112: 106: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4994: 4984: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4970: 4963: 4961: 4953: 4950: 4949: 4948: 4945: 4943: 4938: 4936: 4935: 4929: 4927: 4919: 4910: 4902: 4897: 4895: 4888: 4885: 4879: 4878: 4876: 4872: 4868: 4861: 4858: 4856: 4851: 4848: 4845: 4842: 4840: 4836: 4831: 4830: 4816: 4812: 4811: 4805: 4804: 4798: 4796: 4795: 4785: 4782: 4779: 4778: 4771: 4763: 4759: 4749: 4746: 4743: 4742: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4732: 4728: 4726: 4710: 4707: 4705: 4704: 4700: 4696: 4692: 4691: 4685: 4676: 4657: 4653: 4649: 4639: 4636: 4633: 4632: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4614: 4610: 4606: 4601: 4579: 4565: 4555: 4552: 4549: 4548: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4522: 4517: 4513: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4503: 4502:contributions 4499: 4495: 4494:Jo-Jo Eumerus 4489: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4471: 4468: 4465: 4464: 4457: 4453: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4443: 4442:contributions 4439: 4435: 4434:Jo-Jo Eumerus 4431: 4430: 4429: 4419: 4416: 4413: 4412: 4404: 4398: 4394: 4393:Jo-Jo Eumerus 4389: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4382: 4381:contributions 4378: 4374: 4373:Jo-Jo Eumerus 4366: 4362: 4354: 4344: 4341: 4338: 4337: 4330: 4316: 4313:Example text 4300:<code: --> 4293: 4285: 4277: 4270:<br /: --> 4265:<code: --> 4251: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4231: 4228: 4223: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4208: 4205: 4202: 4201: 4187: 4179: 4171: 4163: 4155: 4147: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4122: 4114: 4104: 4101: 4098: 4097: 4091: 4087: 4081: 4080:Peter coxhead 4076: 4075: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4065:Peter coxhead 4063: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4045: 4042: 4039: 4038: 4031: 4027: 4021: 4020:Peter coxhead 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4004:Peter coxhead 4001: 3993: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3977: 3971: 3962: 3943: 3939: 3934: 3924: 3921: 3918: 3917: 3908: 3904: 3903: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3887: 3886: 3881: 3878: 3873: 3868: 3863: 3860: 3850: 3844: 3838: 3834: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3814: 3813: 3803: 3800: 3797: 3796: 3787: 3783: 3775: 3771: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3758: 3752: 3748: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3730: 3727: 3724: 3723: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3706: 3700: 3696: 3687: 3676: 3675: 3665: 3662: 3659: 3658: 3648: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3624: 3620: 3610: 3607: 3604: 3603: 3596: 3591: 3590:WP:Notability 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3568: 3564: 3550: 3547: 3539: 3529: 3526: 3523: 3522: 3512: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3478: 3475: 3472: 3471: 3461: 3456: 3454: 3444: 3441: 3438: 3437: 3430: 3426: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3408:WP:FILIBUSTER 3404: 3400: 3394: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3369: 3365: 3355: 3352: 3349: 3348: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3321: 3313: 3303: 3300: 3297: 3296: 3289: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3279: 3274: 3267: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3251: 3248: 3245: 3244: 3236: 3235: 3222: 3218: 3213: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3189: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3179: 3174: 3170: 3169: 3163: 3159: 3149: 3146: 3143: 3142: 3135: 3131: 3130: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3112: 3109: 3106: 3103: 3098: 3092: 3088: 3078: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3062: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3038: 3036: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3022: 3016: 3007: 2988: 2984: 2974: 2964: 2961: 2958: 2957: 2948: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2938: 2930: 2924: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2888: 2878: 2875: 2872: 2866: 2864: 2860: 2855: 2850: 2848: 2842: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2817: 2813: 2803: 2800: 2797: 2796: 2786: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2765:Unicode input 2761: 2759: 2755: 2738: 2730: 2720: 2717: 2714: 2713: 2706: 2705: 2700: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2688: 2685: 2684: 2679: 2674: 2669: 2663: 2659: 2649: 2646: 2643: 2642: 2635: 2634: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2599: 2591: 2581: 2578: 2575: 2574: 2565: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2536: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2522: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2477: 2469: 2468: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2451: 2441: 2436: 2432: 2427: 2425: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2385: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2366: 2365:WP:NOT#BUREAU 2360: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2335: 2333: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2306: 2304: 2303: 2297: 2296: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2280: 2277: 2276: 2273: 2269: 2268: 2257: 2251: 2250: 2246: 2239: 2238: 2232: 2231: 2224: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2204: 2201: 2197: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2167: 2163: 2148: 2146: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2132: 2126: 2117: 2098: 2094: 2092: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2074: 2058: 2057: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2044: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2022: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1981: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1964: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1955: 1948: 1942: 1941: 1935: 1934: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1910: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1889: 1885: 1882: 1880: 1875:in particular 1874: 1870: 1866: 1861: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1845: 1841: 1834: 1829: 1828: 1823: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1796: 1788: 1786: 1777: 1774: 1768:<math: --> 1763: 1761: 1758: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1713:<math: --> 1710: 1707: 1703: 1694: 1691: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1668: 1664: 1656: 1652: 1649: 1643: 1636: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1614: 1606: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1534: 1520: 1516: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1478: 1474: 1469: 1468: 1463: 1462: 1457: 1447: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1412: 1400: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1331: 1326: 1320: 1316: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1290: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1246: 1239: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1207: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1191: 1185: 1176: 1157: 1153: 1141: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1117: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1104: 1099: 1097: 1091: 1090:spoke to soon 1087: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1078: 1073: 1071: 1070:Serial Number 1065: 1064: 1063: 1053: 1050: 1047: 1046: 1039: 1032: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1001: 1000: 999: 996: 994: 992: 987: 985: 984:Serial Number 979: 975: 971: 970: 969: 968: 965: 963: 961: 956: 954: 953:Serial Number 949:, take care! 948: 941: 937: 922: 918: 908: 905: 902: 901: 894: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 879: 871: 859: 858: 848: 845: 842: 841: 832: 826: 816: 813: 810: 809: 802: 798: 793: 792: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 767: 766: 765: 764: 754: 751: 748: 747: 738: 734: 730: 724: 723: 722:The Americans 718: 710: 709: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 685: 682: 678: 677: 676: 666: 663: 660: 659: 650: 645: 644: 643: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 620: 616: 613: 607: 598: 578: 576: 575: 571: 567: 563: 562: 556: 535: 531: 527: 526: 522: 518: 514: 513: 508: 503: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 480: 477: 476: 467: 458: 454: 453: 443: 440: 437: 436: 429: 425: 419: 416: 406: 403: 400: 399: 390: 388: 385: 381: 380: 379: 378: 374: 370: 362: 358: 348: 345: 342: 341: 334: 330: 327: 323: 321: 319: 317: 315: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 295:Valley-Dynamo 292: 288: 285: 281: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 265: 261: 254: 252: 248: 244: 240: 233: 228: 226: 217: 215: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 163: 161: 160: 156: 152: 148: 147: 141: 129: 125: 111: 107: 103:December 2017 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4973:TonyBallioni 4965: 4959: 4957: 4946: 4939: 4932: 4930: 4925: 4923: 4891: 4880: 4864: 4862: 4859: 4852: 4849: 4846: 4843: 4832: 4828: 4827: 4808: 4776: 4767: 4740: 4717: 4713: 4708: 4689: 4681: 4674: 4630: 4597: 4546: 4519: 4484:I'll see if 4462: 4410: 4369: 4335: 4324:Example text 4254:I don't use 4225: 4199: 4192:<del: --> 4126: 4095: 4036: 3997: 3975: 3967: 3960: 3915: 3888: 3879: 3861: 3832: 3794: 3785: 3778: 3773: 3769: 3746: 3721: 3694: 3691: 3656: 3651: 3646: 3628: 3601: 3572: 3566: 3520: 3469: 3435: 3429:WP:NOT#PAPER 3419: 3414:. See also 3412:WP:STONEWALL 3373: 3346: 3325: 3294: 3242: 3197: 3196: 3187: 3140: 3107: 3069: 3042: 3020: 3012: 3005: 2955: 2886: 2876: 2867: 2851: 2849: 2847: 2821: 2794: 2762: 2751: 2711: 2680: 2640: 2616:WP:RFAADVICE 2572: 2527: 2495: 2449: 2442: 2433: 2420: 2401: 2376: 2369: 2339: 2314: 2300: 2298: 2294: 2293: 2266: 2265: 2263: 2248: 2242: 2205: 2171: 2165: 2130: 2122: 2115: 2079:TonyBallioni 2077: 2076: 2069: 2054: 2045: 2020: 2019: 2013: 2002: 2001: 1987: 1979: 1978: 1970: 1953: 1952: 1901: 1883: 1863: 1832: 1804: 1657: 1653: 1651:formulas. 1647: 1644: 1640: 1619:Talk:Ireland 1618: 1610: 1588:Talk:Ireland 1562: 1537: 1497: 1490: 1486: 1477:Blade Runner 1476: 1473:film studies 1465: 1461:Blade Runner 1459: 1456:Blade Runner 1455: 1419:— Preceding 1416: 1381: 1336: 1295: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1251: 1211: 1189: 1181: 1174: 1122: 1102: 1096:SerialNumber 1095: 1076: 1069: 1044: 1006: 990: 983: 977: 959: 952: 945: 939: 899: 875: 839: 827: 807: 771:— Preceding 745: 726: 721: 717:Matthew Rhys 688:— Preceding 657: 622:— Preceding 617: 614: 611: 596: 560: 552: 510: 504: 481: 473: 471: 434: 418:PS: This is 417: 397: 366: 339: 260:Gerda Arendt 257: 236: 224: 223: 192: 181: 145: 137: 127: 75: 43: 37: 4777:SMcCandlish 4741:SMcCandlish 4709:Mots justes 4631:SMcCandlish 4609:BlueMoonset 4547:SMcCandlish 4463:SMcCandlish 4411:SMcCandlish 4403:WP:Teahouse 4336:SMcCandlish 4328:War of 1812 4315:War of 1812 4200:SMcCandlish 4096:SMcCandlish 4062:placements. 4037:SMcCandlish 3916:SMcCandlish 3795:SMcCandlish 3722:SMcCandlish 3657:SMcCandlish 3602:SMcCandlish 3521:SMcCandlish 3470:SMcCandlish 3436:SMcCandlish 3425:WP:NOT#NEWS 3347:SMcCandlish 3295:SMcCandlish 3243:SMcCandlish 3141:SMcCandlish 3134:fruit flies 3116:K.e.coffman 3070:SMcCandlish 2956:SMcCandlish 2887:SMcCandlish 2795:SMcCandlish 2769:Peter Brown 2712:SMcCandlish 2641:SMcCandlish 2573:SMcCandlish 2564:Kostas20142 2528:SMcCandlish 2506:Kostas20142 2450:SMcCandlish 2377:SMcCandlish 2009:maintained. 1902:SMcCandlish 1862:precedence. 1860:WP:CONLEVEL 1805:SMcCandlish 1724:WP:CONLEVEL 1717:<dd: --> 1699:<dd: --> 1563:SMcCandlish 1498:SMcCandlish 1382:SMcCandlish 1364:Kingsindian 1337:SMcCandlish 1319:Kingsindian 1252:SMcCandlish 1123:SMcCandlish 1045:SMcCandlish 1007:SMcCandlish 900:SMcCandlish 840:SMcCandlish 808:SMcCandlish 746:SMcCandlish 658:SMcCandlish 512:voting page 435:SMcCandlish 398:SMcCandlish 340:SMcCandlish 205:Kostas20142 95:Archive 140 87:Archive 135 82:Archive 134 76:Archive 133 70:Archive 132 65:Archive 131 60:Archive 130 36:This is an 4450:Could try 4250:ClemRutter 4235:ClemRutter 4146:ClemRutter 4130:ClemRutter 3403:WP:EDITING 2859:WP:FACTION 2683:Saturnalia 2210:. Thanks, 2194:(Read the 1752:MOS:ACCESS 1732:WT:MOSMATH 777:SourceOnly 733:Talk:Kalki 694:SourceOnly 649:SourceOnly 628:SourceOnly 496:topic bans 333:Three-ball 4884:Dan Koehl 4770:Vera Lynn 4521:Callanecc 4488:Callanecc 4452:WT:ARBCOM 4195:markup). 3632:Alex Shih 2871:WP:POLICY 2863:WP:VESTED 2402:condition 1599:Disregard 1531:Moved to 1446:Handbabyy 1425:Handbabyy 1092:! Ffs... 882:Thinker78 545:Disregard 492:site bans 373:JSH-alive 4817:on Meta) 4590:Resolved 4530:contribs 4305:{{!mxt}} 3567:Declined 3288:WT:ADMIN 2951:Thanks! 2913:SilkTork 2828:SilkTork 2748:Resolved 2692:Ealdgyth 2498:Zero0000 2488:Resolved 2426:, which 2406:Jclemens 2359:Jclemens 2343:Jclemens 2316:Sent by 1757:MOS:TEXT 1744:MOS:MATH 1728:WT:MATHS 1706:WP:REUSE 1637:Thoughts 1544:Dicklyon 1433:contribs 1421:unsigned 801:WP:NORNB 785:contribs 773:unsigned 702:contribs 690:unsigned 636:contribs 624:unsigned 428:Sony Six 424:Sony One 369:Sony Ten 363:Sony Ten 218:Precious 174:Resolved 128:Declined 4695:Legobot 4516:WP:ARCA 4456:WP:ARCA 3981:Legobot 3889:Cheers! 3836:endaliv 3750:endaliv 3698:endaliv 3647:support 3416:WP:LAME 3026:Legobot 2936:Windows 2521:WP:DGAF 2502:WP:ARCA 2212:DPL bot 2136:Legobot 2040:BLPPROD 2028:ACTRIAL 1884:If you 1624:Legobot 1330:WP:ARCA 1195:Legobot 1118:on it. 974:palaver 797:WP:RSNB 566:Legobot 151:Legobot 39:archive 4791:ⱷ< 4755:ⱷ< 4645:ⱷ< 4594:Fixed. 4561:ⱷ< 4477:ⱷ< 4425:ⱷ< 4350:ⱷ< 4214:ⱷ< 4110:ⱷ< 4051:ⱷ< 4026:WT:MOS 3930:ⱷ< 3809:ⱷ< 3782:WP:SSF 3736:ⱷ< 3671:ⱷ< 3616:ⱷ< 3535:ⱷ< 3484:ⱷ< 3450:ⱷ< 3399:WP:BRD 3361:ⱷ< 3309:ⱷ< 3257:ⱷ< 3155:ⱷ< 3084:ⱷ< 2970:ⱷ< 2928:Fences 2901:ⱷ< 2818:ArbCom 2809:ⱷ< 2726:ⱷ< 2681:Happy 2655:ⱷ< 2587:ⱷ< 2552:Begoon 2542:ⱷ< 2464:ⱷ< 2391:ⱷ< 2038:, and 1916:ⱷ< 1890:banned 1819:ⱷ< 1797:better 1778:intent 1748:WP:MOS 1695:policy 1648:change 1605:WP:FRS 1577:ⱷ< 1512:ⱷ< 1396:ⱷ< 1360:Huldra 1351:ⱷ< 1315:Huldra 1300:Huldra 1266:ⱷ< 1238:Huldra 1222:Huldra 1137:ⱷ< 1059:ⱷ< 1021:ⱷ< 914:ⱷ< 854:ⱷ< 822:ⱷ< 760:ⱷ< 672:ⱷ< 449:ⱷ< 412:ⱷ< 354:ⱷ< 311:WP:TNT 275:Grazie 4969:here. 4813:(and 4786:: --> 4750:: --> 4640:: --> 4556:: --> 4512:WT:AE 4472:: --> 4420:: --> 4345:: --> 4209:: --> 4105:: --> 4088:below 4046:: --> 3925:: --> 3804:: --> 3731:: --> 3666:: --> 3611:: --> 3530:: --> 3479:: --> 3445:: --> 3391:, and 3356:: --> 3304:: --> 3252:: --> 3150:: --> 3079:: --> 2965:: --> 2932:& 2896:: --> 2879:might 2874:here. 2843:serve 2804:: --> 2721:: --> 2650:: --> 2582:: --> 2537:: --> 2459:: --> 2386:: --> 2166:Fixed 2073:here. 1963:12713 1911:: --> 1886:still 1814:: --> 1681:made. 1572:: --> 1507:: --> 1391:: --> 1346:: --> 1325:WP:AE 1261:: --> 1132:: --> 1116:WP:RM 1103:54129 1077:54129 1054:: --> 1038:WP:RM 1016:: --> 991:54129 960:54129 940:Fixed 909:: --> 849:: --> 817:: --> 755:: --> 740:rate. 729:Kalki 667:: --> 444:: --> 407:: --> 349:: --> 16:< 4977:talk 4942:HERE 4699:talk 4693:. 4682:The 4675:Done 4613:talk 4534:logs 4526:talk 4498:talk 4438:talk 4377:talk 4292:!mxt 4276:!mxt 4239:talk 4178:!mxt 4158:and 4154:!mxt 4134:talk 4069:talk 4008:talk 3985:talk 3979:. 3968:The 3961:Done 3895:‑ ‑ 3891:‑ ‑ 3774:TSoS 3636:talk 3579:talk 3500:talk 3427:and 3410:and 3393:). 3380:talk 3332:talk 3120:talk 3049:talk 3030:talk 3024:. 3013:The 3006:Done 2917:talk 2854:WP:N 2832:talk 2773:talk 2754:Dash 2737:Dash 2696:Talk 2624:talk 2510:talk 2428:made 2410:talk 2347:talk 2326:talk 2216:talk 2178:Pool 2140:talk 2134:. 2123:The 2116:Done 2083:talk 2036:PROD 1844:talk 1833:does 1750:and 1667:talk 1628:talk 1622:. 1611:The 1548:talk 1538:See 1489:and 1464:and 1452:~~~~ 1429:talk 1317:and 1304:talk 1279:need 1226:talk 1199:talk 1193:. 1182:The 1175:Done 978:sans 886:talk 878:look 781:talk 731:and 713:~~~~ 698:talk 632:talk 597:Done 570:talk 564:. 553:The 521:talk 482:The 426:and 289:), " 264:talk 241:and 209:talk 155:talk 149:. 138:The 4624:}}} 4399:lot 4284:dcr 4280:or 4258:or 4186:dcr 4162:dcr 3843:Δ's 3757:Δ's 3705:Δ's 3395:You 3045:RAN 2500:at 2437:foo 2419:it! 2196:FAQ 2032:CSD 1894:alt 1871:but 1867:not 1840:CBM 1789:not 1764:any 1663:CBM 1358:To 799:or 719:in 680:do. 391:not 331:of 324:), 293:", 4979:) 4971:— 4944:. 4887:. 4787:ⱷ҅ 4774:— 4751:ⱷ҅ 4738:— 4724:咨 4701:) 4641:ⱷ҅ 4628:— 4615:) 4592:– 4557:ⱷ҅ 4544:— 4536:) 4532:• 4528:• 4504:) 4500:, 4473:ⱷ҅ 4460:— 4458:. 4444:) 4440:, 4421:ⱷ҅ 4408:— 4383:) 4379:, 4346:ⱷ҅ 4333:— 4322:: 4296:}} 4290:{{ 4286:}} 4282:{{ 4278:}} 4274:{{ 4241:) 4210:ⱷ҅ 4197:— 4188:}} 4184:{{ 4180:}} 4176:{{ 4172:}} 4170:xt 4168:{{ 4164:}} 4160:{{ 4156:}} 4152:{{ 4136:) 4106:ⱷ҅ 4093:— 4071:) 4047:ⱷ҅ 4034:— 4010:) 3987:) 3926:ⱷ҅ 3913:— 3911:. 3847:/ 3839:// 3830:—/ 3805:ⱷ҅ 3792:— 3761:/ 3753:// 3744:—/ 3732:ⱷ҅ 3719:— 3709:/ 3701:// 3667:ⱷ҅ 3654:— 3638:) 3612:ⱷ҅ 3599:— 3581:) 3531:ⱷ҅ 3518:— 3502:) 3480:ⱷ҅ 3467:— 3446:ⱷ҅ 3433:— 3431:. 3382:) 3357:ⱷ҅ 3344:— 3334:) 3305:ⱷ҅ 3292:— 3253:ⱷ҅ 3240:— 3151:ⱷ҅ 3138:— 3122:) 3080:ⱷ҅ 3067:— 3051:) 3032:) 2966:ⱷ҅ 2953:— 2919:) 2897:ⱷ҅ 2884:— 2877:I 2834:) 2805:ⱷ҅ 2792:— 2775:) 2767:. 2760:. 2722:ⱷ҅ 2709:— 2694:- 2651:ⱷ҅ 2638:— 2626:) 2583:ⱷ҅ 2570:— 2538:ⱷ҅ 2525:— 2512:) 2490:– 2460:ⱷ҅ 2447:— 2412:) 2387:ⱷ҅ 2374:— 2349:) 2328:) 2218:) 2202:.) 2184:| 2142:) 2085:) 2075:— 2034:, 2023:: 1982:: 1956:: 1912:ⱷ҅ 1899:— 1842:· 1815:ⱷ҅ 1802:— 1665:· 1630:) 1601:– 1573:ⱷ҅ 1560:— 1550:) 1508:ⱷ҅ 1495:— 1435:) 1431:• 1392:ⱷ҅ 1379:— 1347:ⱷ҅ 1334:— 1306:) 1275:no 1262:ⱷ҅ 1249:— 1247:. 1228:) 1208:Hi 1201:) 1133:ⱷ҅ 1120:— 1055:ⱷ҅ 1042:— 1017:ⱷ҅ 1004:— 910:ⱷ҅ 897:— 888:) 880:. 850:ⱷ҅ 837:— 818:ⱷ҅ 805:— 803:. 787:) 783:• 756:ⱷ҅ 743:— 704:) 700:• 668:ⱷ҅ 655:— 638:) 634:• 602:– 572:) 547:– 523:) 515:. 494:, 445:ⱷ҅ 432:— 430:. 408:ⱷ҅ 395:— 375:/ 350:ⱷ҅ 337:— 305:, 301:, 297:, 282:, 266:) 258:-- 253:! 211:) 191:. 176:– 157:) 132:– 91:→ 4975:( 4896:. 4789:ᴥ 4784:¢ 4781:☏ 4753:ᴥ 4748:¢ 4745:☏ 4697:( 4643:ᴥ 4638:¢ 4635:☏ 4611:( 4559:ᴥ 4554:¢ 4551:☏ 4524:( 4496:( 4490:: 4486:@ 4475:ᴥ 4470:¢ 4467:☏ 4436:( 4423:ᴥ 4418:¢ 4415:☏ 4395:: 4391:@ 4375:( 4348:ᴥ 4343:¢ 4340:☏ 4252:: 4248:@ 4237:( 4212:ᴥ 4207:¢ 4204:☏ 4148:: 4144:@ 4132:( 4108:ᴥ 4103:¢ 4100:☏ 4082:: 4078:@ 4067:( 4049:ᴥ 4044:¢ 4041:☏ 4022:: 4018:@ 4006:( 3983:( 3928:ᴥ 3923:¢ 3920:☏ 3833:M 3807:ᴥ 3802:¢ 3799:☏ 3747:M 3734:ᴥ 3729:¢ 3726:☏ 3695:M 3669:ᴥ 3664:¢ 3661:☏ 3634:( 3614:ᴥ 3609:¢ 3606:☏ 3577:( 3533:ᴥ 3528:¢ 3525:☏ 3513:: 3509:@ 3498:( 3482:ᴥ 3477:¢ 3474:☏ 3462:: 3458:@ 3448:ᴥ 3443:¢ 3440:☏ 3378:( 3359:ᴥ 3354:¢ 3351:☏ 3330:( 3307:ᴥ 3302:¢ 3299:☏ 3277:✉ 3264:" 3255:ᴥ 3250:¢ 3247:☏ 3216:✉ 3153:ᴥ 3148:¢ 3145:☏ 3118:( 3082:ᴥ 3077:¢ 3074:☏ 3063:: 3059:@ 3047:( 3028:( 2968:ᴥ 2963:¢ 2960:☏ 2949:: 2945:@ 2915:( 2899:ᴥ 2894:¢ 2891:☏ 2830:( 2807:ᴥ 2802:¢ 2799:☏ 2787:: 2783:@ 2771:( 2724:ᴥ 2719:¢ 2716:☏ 2653:ᴥ 2648:¢ 2645:☏ 2622:( 2585:ᴥ 2580:¢ 2577:☏ 2566:: 2562:@ 2540:ᴥ 2535:¢ 2532:☏ 2508:( 2462:ᴥ 2457:¢ 2454:☏ 2408:( 2389:ᴥ 2384:¢ 2381:☏ 2361:: 2357:@ 2345:( 2324:( 2214:( 2180:( 2138:( 2081:( 2016:. 1914:ᴥ 1909:¢ 1906:☏ 1846:) 1838:( 1817:ᴥ 1812:¢ 1809:☏ 1793:: 1782:: 1687:: 1669:) 1661:( 1626:( 1575:ᴥ 1570:¢ 1567:☏ 1546:( 1510:ᴥ 1505:¢ 1502:☏ 1448:: 1444:@ 1427:( 1394:ᴥ 1389:¢ 1386:☏ 1370:♚ 1367:♝ 1349:ᴥ 1344:¢ 1341:☏ 1321:: 1313:@ 1302:( 1291:) 1283:I 1264:ᴥ 1259:¢ 1256:☏ 1240:: 1236:@ 1224:( 1197:( 1135:ᴥ 1130:¢ 1127:☏ 1057:ᴥ 1052:¢ 1049:☏ 1033:: 1029:@ 1019:ᴥ 1014:¢ 1011:☏ 912:ᴥ 907:¢ 904:☏ 884:( 852:ᴥ 847:¢ 844:☏ 833:: 829:@ 820:ᴥ 815:¢ 812:☏ 779:( 758:ᴥ 753:¢ 750:☏ 696:( 670:ᴥ 665:¢ 662:☏ 651:: 647:@ 630:( 608:. 568:( 519:( 447:ᴥ 442:¢ 439:☏ 410:ᴥ 405:¢ 402:☏ 386:, 352:ᴥ 347:¢ 344:☏ 262:( 207:( 153:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index