User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 38

4293:, I would agree with you. But that's not the case here. Again, there's nothing at all in any copyright laws I'm aware of, anywhere, requiring active hypertext links, and again I've already said that I agree its okay for Wikipedians to be safer than sorrier on the issue, even if the results are a bit annoying. And en.wp doesn't care about .se laws, since the servers aren't hosted there. It's utterly impossible for the foundation to attempt to comply with every legal regime in the world, since they conflict is tens of thousands of ways. Anyway, I don't see why we're arguing about it at all. I've already agreed not to change any more templates to use a blank 3014:

your comment in response to SilkTork's oppose. I always like editors who keep their RfAs open as long as possible to gain feedback and I think some of the opposers have genuinely good advice to offer and, if it would make the slightest bit of difference, it might tempt me to move to neutral but it wouldn't affect the outcome. Anyhow, try building on the criticism you've received, show the community you can take it and use it to make yourself a better editor and try getting involved in areas where you can make useful suggestions or closing XfDs and proving you

2888:

reason for the possibly "bitey" comments etc. Also because you have made so many responses to the opposes does not look good and some people will oppose just based on this. It is best to only correct factual errors in oppose rationales and let others argue your case. Also your huge bold signature all over the page draws far too much attention to yourself, this gets people annoyed. I happen to think you would be a great admin but RfA appears to have become a game of populartity/know the right people/never upset anyone.

2174: 1502:

its origin (per your examples above) but on its general use and acceptability. Consider trendy spellings of traditional names, or the use of the letter 'u' instead of the word 'you' - these make me wince and I'd love to call them mis-spellings ;). So basically, I've generally tended to reserve mis-spelling class for obvious cases and used the more general class where doubt exists. Thanks for fixing the link to the missing template, I'm more than happy to defer to your judgment here. -

5034:'s attention specifically, not the editors', really torques off a lot of people on en.wiki (I have noticed that some other-language Wikipedias don't feel that strongly about it). And having the template visible at all is more than enough "pointing to deficiencies in the article". Make a redundant selfref isn't "avoiding selfrefs", basically. Some might ask "What selfref?", the answer to which is that anything that takes the reader out of reading mode and into thinking "I wonder what 5803: 5474: 5459: 1791: 1710: 593: 2536:

easy to churn out all sorts of e-mails, off-wiki, selectively targeting only people I get along with really well here. What I have actually done is notified these 4 parties for the reasons given, and a few other parties who either offered to nominate me or expressed a desire to be kept informed of my RfA status, and I've been entirely above-board about it, including publicly stating that I would notify Noetica in e-mail. I stand by these as perfectly appropriate

1873: 31: 972: 368:

start rolling, so I just yanked the whole thing, and forgot about adminship for a long time. I've had a bunch of nomination offers (one even went and created the 2nd RfA page!), but I've been holding off until certain I have the time and attention to do useful stuff. Anyway, the COI thing was a noob blunder in 2006. The civility thing is something I've worked on a lot. I do not suffer total fools lightly, but I think people at

4631:. The only functional differences that were actually in use were (and still are) 1) it took the challenged text as a variable (i.e. "surrounded" the unsourced statements), and 2) faintly underlined that text. None of that has changed. Can you explain what you see the issue as? It certainly has not stopped working for more than one contiguous sentence. I'm not sure why you are focused on sentences anyway. It's 3815: 3189: 3224: 4085:, because it's fine for the foundation and its userbase to be legally over-protective, as long as the cost is just annoyances like this. "Better safe than sorry", as the saying goes. It's like looking both ways 10 times before crossing the street: It's annoying, but theoretically it actually is safer. If your concern is that I'm going to ignore you and continue putting 3212: 2726:. May I ask why you decided to do this? If you wished me to retract my comment to Ret.Prof, I would have been happy to do so; however, unilaterally removing it yourself might be viewed as a little rude. Further, leaving yourself as the only person to reply to your opposers might further any views that you are "badgering." Looking forward to your reply, 5789: 5514: 4519: 4449: 4344: 3933: 3784: 3726: 3540: 3480: 3355: 3157: 3077: 3002: 2876: 2711: 2643: 2581: 2497: 2376: 2264: 2158: 2034: 1777: 1696: 1556: 1344: 1224: 1145: 1075: 960: 833: 783: 626: 579: 292: 177: 115: 4974:. However, your arguments against having such an ability are put well. Also, having read your comments above, I agree completely. I think that so long as the bots will come by later and add the date, there is no reason to have any parameters. My only confusion with the above is that I do not see how the subtle underlining violates either of 1290:, so it could be in something else, or as you suggest another edition. As the "Or not?" is utterly redundant, as well as a sentence fragment, I have a hard time believing it is Fowler's; if it is, it should be cut anyway; and if it is, the entire passage needs to be quoted and cited properly. Given all that, I stand by my cut. : --> 2305:. This template was created in September 2009. You used it for dates preceding this, thus causing an error message. I don't think it is a good idea to retroactively create those monthly maintenance categories. I do not know of another equivalent template, so perhaps we should just not tag articles created before September 2009. 5976: 4050:

licenses readily available. If we don't link to the image page it takes specialised technical knowledge to find the image page. Thus that means we are hiding away the attribution and license. Copyright law says we must abide by what the image license says, even if it says we should jump on one leg and scream "

5304:

a problematic passage, and without any way to be really clear about precisely what needs clarifying (the last two words? the last three sentences?) As for the underlining, maybe it stays, maybe it goes. My money is on "goes" just because of my memory of innumerable reader-bugging templates that have

4655:

is useful for flagging more than one of them, whether in one sentence or not. It's also, entirely incidentally, useful for flagging one specific one where it might be unclear to what extent multiple facts in one sentence are unsourced. Anyway, I'm not going to go on until I hear back from you on what

4254:

Sure, the author name and license for that image are available here. We got 866,849 image pages here at Knowledge (XXG), and another 5,818,319 over at Wikimedia Commons, you are free to search through them to find that author name and license. And you are free to hire some computer geek that can help

3366:

In the process of looking over all the pages of stats generatable by the tool box in my RfA page, I noticed on that listed off my accounts across the project and their relationship. All of them seemed normal (either created by SUL or created independently before that), with the sole exception of user

3088:

I have withdrawn my question, following advice from an admin! I had withdrawn it from another open RfA, and was going to do so on your when my browser crashed. When I got back, I then saw that you'd answered it a bit ago. If you want the question and your answer to remain, feel free to revert it, but

3039:

Thanks. That means a lot, actually. My skin's pretty thick, and I don't mind genuinely constructive criticism, but outright hate from 3 or 4 years ago, and blatantly false accusations are a bit hard to swallow, so it hasn't been a happy morning for me. :-) I was skeptical about accepting a nomination

2745:

I would certainly never do that on purpose! Lemme go look... I wouldn't touch anything of anyone else's in an RfA other than to fix the numbering of the entries or something like that. I was probably a copy-paste error on my part. I don't remember seeing your note at all. At this point I don't care

2508:

Hey there. Saw your post on Tony1's talk page, and I wish you the best of luck with your RfA. I just wanted to let you know that some voters at RfA will oppose for the type of post you made to Noetica, Pmanderson, and Tony1's talk pages. I would advise you to undo your edits so that your RfA won't be

1501:

I understand the distinction you are making between an alternate spelling and a mis-spelling. Myself, I would consider mis-spelling to be a subclass of alternate spelling. The 'correctness' of any given alternate spelling (and therefore the applicability of the mis-spelling tag) depends not only on

1248:

You cut the "Or not". My difficulty here is that I don't know if the "Or not" was from Fowler or from an editor here. If from Fowler, probably best left, if not, best cut, but we are not quoting the whole of Fowler, nor should we, so it could be just to cut it even if it is in Fowler (and it would be

897:

Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day (a day being from 0:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC), although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed". However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can

446:

I'd be honored! Fuhghettaboutit's also doing one, and several others have offered to co-nom over the last few years. Not sure what to do with that many co-noms, but I'd love to have yours because of your depth of experience, and Fughettaboutit's because of our long collaboration and his, in my view,

431:

Answering your last questions first, I had no specific agenda in mind, but your positive responses above and most notably your honesty (honesty, I think, is a really good thing in an admin and at RfA) especially combined with your humility (gosh, you admin you've got things wrong in the past) make me

5676:

In this instance, you misconstrues something like blame for what was in fact cooperation. The irony is bitter, but not wrong. I reject the tone, but I accept the accuracy and timeliness of words I could have written myself. What I need now is a kind of alchemy which converts it all into something

5038:

means, in Wikipedianese?" mode is in fact a selfref, per "if it walks like a duck..." logic. This is one reason our inline templates are so succinct and plain-English (with a few exceptions that need fixing). I.e. they say things like "citation needed" or "dubious" instead of "fix per V & RS" or

4131:

Okay. My stance is that the issue hasn't been important to me personally (I even have bigger usability/accessibility/standards compliance issues here than that one), but if multiple people want to have a discussion about it, I'll be happy to participate. I'm not in a position to champion one side or

3989:

to that information. If that were the case, the entire Internet would collapse, since all the free software in the world would be illegal for using code comments to provide attrib. and lic. info instead of having the end-product applications provide links to it. I guess we'd have to get rid of books

3984:

I'd forgotten about that. I don't actually agree with that legal analysis at all, but I do recall that it is the one that consensus has settled on. I don't agree because simply providing the location of attribution and licensing information is sufficient; there is nothing at all in copyright law to

2535:

before!) as well as fruitfully collaborated. Noetica was notified because he is mentioned by name, with a claim about our interaction, and should be in a position to confirm it or not. I have also notified Radiant, as my original RfA's chief opponent. If I were really going to canvas, it would be

2530:

I think that would look "guilty" or "sneaky". I notified Pmanderson/Septentrionalis and Tony1 because I have interacted, both pro and con, with them more than any other editors on the system other than Fuhghettaboutit (my co-nominator), so they are both in a position to accurately judge me, and have

4080:

many Wikipedians come to the conclusion that they do on this issue; I just believe it to be an incorrect, and "paranoid", conclusion. Just to be clear: The reason that the rationale is wrong is that the licenses are already "readily available" simply by being on the system and attached to the image

3965:

Most image licenses require author attribution and that the full license text is sent along or linked to. So we have to have links to the image pages where we state the authors name, type of license and link on to the full license text. We may only unlink images that are public domain and with some

3013:

Hi, I wish we could have bumped into each other under slightly happier circumstances, but I though I'd introduce myself anyway. I hope you won't take my comments in your RfA personally and use them to build yourself up a bit more and I'd genuinely like to see you back there in a few months. I liked

5205:

removed, how the necessity for a citation for the multiple sentences/phrases will be made clear and not just thought to apply only to the last one that has the words “citation needed” attached. If you can make it clearer for me me how the editor will know what is in need of referencing, that it is

4009:

to create a link to a bigger, better version of a thumbnailed image. In other cases, iconic images should act as buttons, just as they do in, well, every other machine-human interface on the entire planet. And when neither case applies (i.e. the image is just fluff) nothing should happen at all.

3847:

New editors' lack of understanding of Knowledge (XXG) processes has resulted in thousands of BLPs being created over the last few years that do not meet BLP requirements. We are currently seeking constructive proposals on how to help newcomers better understand what is expected, and how to improve

2654:

Not sure if you were referencing the edits I made, but I didn't make any biased positive comments about Kevin Trudeau's occupation. All I did was delete the negative ones. I personally happen to think the guy is a fraud and a con artist of the worst kind, but as I said in my edit description, it's

4071:

As I said, I don't want to get into an argument about this. :-) I have given it a great deal of thought, and the general Wikipedian perspective on the matter appears to be legally flawed. I know more about online copyright law than most lawyers who aren't specialists in the matter. I worked with

4042:

In books we know we can first look around the image, if the attribution isn't there, then we look at the first and last pages of the book. Also, the images in books usually are not GFDL or CS-BY-SA, instead the publishers have commercial agreements with the image owners, agreements that allow the

2887:

Hello. I think this RfA will be a clear fail. I think you have been unwittingly your own worst enemy. You are a very enthusiastic editor who wants to get things exactly right. That appears to me to be the reason why the hesitation in initiating the RfA, the reason for the possible canvassing, the

2670:

No, I was responding to someone's addition of a claim that Trudeau was a "consumer protection advocate" and something else, too, contradicted by the evidence. I'm not fan of Trudeau's either. I side with you on moving the legal material to the legal section, other than that the lead must at least

1270:

Also "teenagers" was not a word when the second edition was published. So, is this in Birchfields third edition (ugh)? Or is the comment added by an editor here, in which case I think it should not be shown to be a quote when it is outside the quote. That really is my point, which part of this is

5562:

to me. You are spending way too much time coming up with allegedly clever little diagrams about mentorship and thinking outside boxes, and creating user sub pages about mentorship, and editing essays about mentorship, and so on, when the purpose of the ArbCom requiring you to have a mentor or be

3401:

but it says that the ruwiki account was autocreated as well. The tool has had some problems these past days, so you might have seen this incorrect information during one of those problem times when some servers were offline. In future, if you have any such questions, please use the relevant talk

367:

That's all such old news. I did withdraw my original nomination back in early 2007. It wasn't going hugely well, even if more + than -, and I was going to let it play out. Then a sock puppet generated a false but apparently credible-to-some accusation that caused a negative "me too" snowball to

4049:

While here at Knowledge (XXG) we mostly use images with GFDL and CS-BY-SA licenses or similar. We don't have special commercial agreements with the authors who made the images. We don't pay the image authors anything. So we have to obey by the requirement to attribute those authors and make the

1252:

I don't mind it being cut, but I checked in my Fowler second edition and I can't find it at all. (I hate the third edition but I have one somewhere propping up a table or something.) Either I am losing sanity and it is in the second edition and I just can't see it, or this quotation is not from

2544:

and if someone wants to oppose me on a bogus basis, oh well. I'm offering to serve WP as a janitor because I have time to do so finally; if I were really a power-hungry, sneaky type I would have RfA'd again in late 2007 with the two nominators that offered then, and worked hard, honestly and

1253:

Modern English Usage at all or is in a different article. I think it would be good if we could clarify this. More than likely it is my own stupidity, but the fact that it is unclear and I spotted it and it confused me does, to my mind, indicate that its provenance needs to be made clearer.

3887:

I'm loath to get involved in userspaced quasi-projects, especially when they are partisan on an issue I've already taken a position on, as I have at the RfC in question. I'd rather see what comes out of the RfC than devote pre-emptive energy in a direction that may not prove viable. —

5662:

You question the efficacy of time invested in essay writing, but these exercises were proposed by tentative co-mentors whose ideas I am encouraged to make my own. Also, this was informed by a similar strategy which seems to have worked well enough for another mentorship group -- see

540:

page and then add them to the real RfA at some point quasi-soon (i.e. not February :-) I have a lot of reading to catch up on. I actually did read oodles and oodles of this stuff before my first RfA, but it's mostly all changed years later, so I'm starting over with a lot of it. —

4251:

And since I edit from Sweden I also have to take into account what the copyright law in my country says. Thankfully I know a bit about how the law works in my country, I've won all my legal actions so far.:)) I am pretty sure that our courts over here wouldn't accept this excuse:

907:

Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome!

6018:

to fix or improve things, like bad page names and vague page rationales, two problems that page suffered. Just so you know and are not alarmed by it, the video game DELSORT page has been proposed for a rename, because it is over in the VG project instead of under DELSORT. —

3669:

Sorry with the way it went. I'd really like to see you run again soon, because I think you'd be a valuable addition to the team. I like the way you see truth in some of the opposes and seem happy to respond to them in a positive manner. Good luck with that and if you go to

4039:"Free" Software licenses like GPL usually don't require that the attribution and license is showed to every end user, but instead only to those that install and run the software. And you might have noticed that during installation such software often show a lot of stuff. 3367:

SMcCandlish at ru.wikipedia which was said to be not connected to the rest. This seems like an error, as it's unlikely that some other S McCandlish is a ruwiki editor. I'm not either for that matter, just mystified as to the reasons behind this lone SUL system glitch. —

4355:

Thanks for the tip on when not to use subst. I have trouble knowing when to use it and when not. Sometimes it is supposed to be used and template instructions take it for granted folks like me already know. Is there a simple way to know when to use it and when not?

2184:

Christian understanding of the Trinity, Jesus and God the Father are separate "persons" of the Trinity (in a special Latin sense of the word "person", which is not the same as the most often-used modern English sense of this word), but Jesus and God are not separate...

5704:

Okay, I may have misinterpreted some of what I was seeing. If the essay stuff has been helpful for you, then that is a good thing. I have a great many "fish to fry" as the saying goes, and you already have a number of mentoring volunteers so I think you'll be fine. —

5039:"NPOV/NOR issue", because the cognitive disturbance to the reader is lower-impact and more quickly dispelled. An argument can be made that the underlining helps to distinguish between the two templates, but the NODISCLAIMERS/SELFREF response is that we don't 372:

and other hot-tempered forums I'm a regular at can vouch for my ability to deal with disputes calmly. I expect to be gnawed at in RfA by a few people who have been particularly fierce debate opponents in the past, including the recent past (e.g. the RfC at

456:

and realize that I don't know the answer to some of the questions (especially the blocking ones - I don't plan to do much if any blocking other than for outright intransigent vandalism). So I still have some research to do and am not in a huge hurry. —

4836:

All the parameters you removed were optional. This was stated in the documentation. If it was not stated clearly, why not fix the doc? If they are left out, the thing works. So why would you remove the option? I went to use one of them when applying

1093:

we better do not interwiki link David Gottlieb, the link would lead to an othe Davis wich is not the creator of pinball machines. I think the creator David Gottlieb deserves his own article. Please make one if you have information about him, I dont.

5571:

of finding and having mentor is inimical to that. Looks like several have accepted already anyway, so best of luck. Try to remember that this is encyclopedia-bulding project, not an experiment in virtual governance (not intentionally, anyway). —

3689:

Okey dokey! Thanks. And I'm not in any huge hurry. I've done fine without admin tools for years. I could be more efficient and useful with them, but it's not like my to-do list is empty and I'm just sitting here picking my nose or anything. ;-) —

3556:

I wanted to state for the record that I think you are a great editor. However, I believe you care deeply about issues (as do I) and that this is a difficulty for Admins. What I am saying should be taken as a compliment. Keep up the good work. -

2045:

Thanks for flagging that up to me. You may want to get some of the other editors, who occasionally edit on such articles, to comment on the proposal. I can't remember such names at 5:20am, so have a look through recent darts articles such as

4281:, with attr./lic. info, which is given in every case of use of that image. No "searching" is necessary. If this system was one in which the attr./lic. information was in a page completely different from the image (i.e., the image was at 3311: 3863: 3837: 3306: 3320: 451:

there's a draft RfA with two co-noms on it that are probably too old to keep, but I've been working on answers to the stock 3 questions. They are far too long in this draft, but the gist is all there. :-) I've also been looking over

4925:, and should have been there years ago. An argument can be made that the underlining highlighting is useful to, but I have already made a case elsewhere that it's a blatant transgression against en.wiki guidelines, specifically at 4719:

subtle dotted line. That’s what took me to the template page and its revision history. But, after I read your response above, I went and tried it again and it worked! So, what was that all about? A one-time only glitch drawing the

3325: 3297: 1243:

Fowler also quoted: "At the sixth round, there were almost as many fellows shouting out 'Go it, Figs', as there were youths exclaiming 'Go it, Cuff'. — Thackeray." Were older men supporting Figs and teenagers supporting Cuff? Or

5000:(i.e., wrapping sentences with subtle underlining), I am happy. And, I am secretly glad to see the end of those options. I think I was trying to force myself to make use of them since I had recently discovered that they existed. 4308:;-) If Xeno or whoever wants to raise the issue elsewhere, that's fine, but my user page is for collaborating with me or raising issues with my editing, not policy debates, which can't possibly be resolved here, right? Heh. — 3292: 2956:

No biggie either way. If I "wanted" adminship, like for "power" and stuff, I would have RfA'd in in Nov. 2007 or so. Thanks, though. If there is a next time (it would take quite a bit of convincing...), I think it would

3966:

other licenses. Unlinking other images is illegal (copyright crime) and means the image authors can sue you and/or Wikimedia Foundation and win in most courts in most countries. Sorry about that, copyright is a hassle.

2227:

Anyway, the issue of what to do with the text at that article should be discussed at that article's talk page; there are multiple viewpoints in the debate, so just us two talking about it here won't fix anything. —

3219: 3215: 5006:

Again, I apologize for the confusion. I just cannot figure out why it did not show up on my screen correctly … This template is one of my favorites and I would hate to see it go to TfD again. Thanks Stanton! —

3852: 3737:

I saw your name at the copyeditors guild page. I was wondering if you would like to copyedit this article for FAC. The lead has already been done, so everything after that needs checking. Thanks for your help.

4914:

with many more reasons for deletion than were brought last time. The only *useful* functionality of this template is the "surrounding" function - which is very, very, useful - and which should be merged into

4247:

But as Xeno said, this should be referred to the lawyers of the Wikimedia Foundation. As long as Wikimedia Foundation hasn't issued a formal decision on this, I think it is our duty to "better be safe than

4906:, and 2) actively encouraging *a template that exists for a specific purpose* to be completely randomly re-tasked to do and say anything is literally begging for abuse by vandals and clueless people. If 1156:

My nom is there. Go ahead and finish it all off. I wish you luck. Remember that RfA can be a rough ride, but that's for good reasons. I know you'll be open to genuine constructive criticism. Go for it.

3717: 5529:. In the months since I created this article, the topic has taken on an unanticipated personal relevance. I wonder if you might consider joining other co-mentors in a mentorship committee for me? 211:

Thanks; I didn't figure I'd need to tag the talks; they were just there for testing the non-talk variants. :-) I think I just flagged a few more for nuking. Its funny how much junk can accumulate. —

3274: 3267: 3260: 3253: 798:

and would like to inform you that I have proposed a WikiProject that would do those same kinds of talk page clean-up edits. If you are interested, I would appreciate you adding your support to the

4538:

and I must say that I am shocked. Some of the work was necessary and good. But, overall you do not understand the purpose of the template. The way you have made it, it is now no different than

1294:

I hadn't realized there was that much difference between later editions. I guess I'll have to scare up a copy of the 2nd and 3rd then, since all I've got are the 4th and a reprint of the 1st.

4933:, among other problems. That I can actually live with. Having a template say it is for purpose "X" when in reality it can be repurposed to mean and say anything is completely pointless. — 3018:

give a nice, succinct rationale. I'm around if you should want to chat or you can email me if you feel the need to rant (I have a failed RfA of my own- I now it's not easy). All the best,

3040:

again, at all, anyway, but after several years of people bugging me to ask for the mop again, I figured it was worth a try since I actually have time to do some admin work. <shrug: -->

3601:

I just wanted to say that I'm impressed with your withdrawal statement. Too often, editors doing this want to blame other editors or groups of editors, whereas you didn't. Hopefully you

4771:

and reload the page) after it has changed before its transclusions will reflect the change (or wait a while, sometimes several minutes). No apologies! I'm sure it was quite alarming! —

4598:

made your proposals there. This particular template has already been vastly improved from its original and you have essentially come along and gutted it. You have all but deleted it. —

1014:

Thanks. I would have done this ages ago if I'd thought about it (I didn't because I always NPP'd with redirs turned off, so I didn't realize what a mess that is when it's turned on!) —

982:

autoreviewer rights on your account, as you have created numerous valid articles. This will have little or no effect on your editing, and is intended mainly to reduce the workload on

4740:

applying it can do so? Also, now that it is working on my screen, the documentary re-write was a good one. Again, sorry that I thought it was screwed up. (Scroll down ↓ for more.) —

5408:

I don't know what you mean; I never said anything had any conclusion to merge. I have proposed one. See the talk page of any previously TfD'd template for a link to its TfD. —

799: 2834:

Thanks, but I'll probably withdraw it after it turns into a more boring pile-on. Some of the incoming comments are still interesting and aren't entirely "me too" posts yet. —

2750:, just not with being gored to pieces for things I didn't even do. RfA is supposed to be a constructive, analytical process of community consensus-forming, not a suspension of 4046:

The same goes for most commercial web sites: They have (or are at least required by law to have) agreements with the image owners that let them use the images the way they do.

2545:

otherwise for acceptance. But it's 2010 now, and I haven't done anything to engineer my way into "power". If people can't see that, then I'm not sure I want the bucket. :-) —

5043:

to do that for readers, only for editors, and the source code being different in obvious ways is enough to accomplish this for editors. Then again I may be full of it. :-) —

3990:

and stuff too, since they don't have links (but do note that when they provide photo attribution and licensing they very frequently do not do it right where the image is but

2746:

if I'm seen as "badgering". The RfA is a lost cause and I'm not going to have blatant falsehoods told about me to my face without responding to them. I'm perfectly fine with

4763:

It was probably just database lag. Sometimes you have to force templates and template documentation and anything else transcluded to purge (open it in edit mode, but change

1460:

since they would not be "alternatives" at all but errors. PS: If, say, the cover of the Canadian or whatever version of the game uses a "Cue Ball" spelling, then definitely

514:

Hey guys. Unimpeachable, huh? I'll drop Cheney a note and tell him we got away with it all. Just so you know, I have posted my nomination to the live page (not the draft).--

2961:

go better, since this must be one of the worst RfAs of all time, on the level of how much of it is nonsense, 3-4 year old grudges and outright falsehoods. <shrug: -->

4990:, I could not find the violation; but then, I am not as familiar with it as are you. Again, now that the template is working on my screen, and not looking identical to 533: 3997:

Not something I care to argue about, though I think the community needs to get wise on this, as linking to every image is a completely dirt-stupid thing to do from a

2789:

Fixed! I think it was as database error. Something like that happens to me about 3 or 4 times per month. Something that should show up as an edit conflict doesn't. —

4081:

pages at all. There's nothing in copyright law that would require an active hypertext link to that page. That said, and my usability and accessibility gripes aside,

350: 5102:

Sourced material. {{fact|1=Several sentences with a total of 4 unsourced claims}}. Lots more sourced material. Unsourced claim.{{fact}} More sourced material.

5270:

be singularly different. The functionality is so useful and so simple it should be ubiquitous. It actually amazes me that, even something like a year after

4910:

is the code you're upset about the removal of, then I don't know what to tell you, other than that I will have little choice but to return this template to

5690:

you have written, the nature of your "decline" encourages me to hope you might reconsider -- if not now, then perhaps at some other point in the future?--

5667:. This writing has helped re-focus and refine my thinking about what I need, and yet, I felt impatient for the very same reasons you articulate crisply. 4010:

This has been basic Web usability and accessibility horse sense since the mid 1990s, and based on user interface studies going back to the late 1960s. —

2540:, and will point to this explanation if anyone raises the issue. I see where you're coming from about what some voters might do, but I have not violated 4005:

point of view. Its one of the absolute worst interface "features" of MediaWiki, as a default. It should only happen (and would be good) when the editor

1645:". It needs to make up its mind. I was just trying to make it consistent (in one direction; looks like it needed to be made consistent in the other). — 727: 722: 5606:

is my knee-jerk response, but the unexpected reaction needs a little explanation. These comments are frustrating, on-point, ironic -- and also welcome.

1579:

back, since edit intros work very differently than edit notices; concerning documentation, the most important difference is that the <noinclude: -->

4464:. I had brought it into my user namespace while I was working on it and its accompanying template and had forgotten to turn off the cats. Thanks! — 1432: 2655:

not neutral or necessary to list as part of a description of who he is "convicted felon". That's what the section on his legal disputes is for.

453: 320:

Indeedy! I was finishing my degree after 15 years or so out of school and in the workforce, so I didn't really have time to go for the mop. —

4847:

and noticed nothing was working any more. So how do I indicate a paragraph that needs sourcing in an otherwise sourced section? I cannot use

876:

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool

4896:

Already explained in edit summaries. 1) Having options to make the text say anything and refer to anything makes it a meaningless rehash of

2398: 1464: 1422: 196:, that you didn't tag, but had tagged their user space counterparts. If you want them back, just drop me a note and I'll restore it. -- 4732:, since now it is appearing fine on the kiddie actor stub I was just editing. By the way, why does the sample display at the top of the 2294: 1418:

frequently enough that they are legitimate variations and not rare typographical errors, in which case the latter two titles would be a

5558:

Sorry, but I had only very tangential contact with that article or anything else you've been involved with, and your case looks like a

4705:. So, I was editing this article, and an otherwise well-referenced section had a paragraph devoid of references. So, I went to use the 1363:) does not currently exist. Do you intend to create this template, or is your intention to link to an existing redirect template (see 5497: 4736:

no longer show the dotted line example? Could that be something that could be restored so that anyone wanting to see how it will look

4202:

page, but honestly I spend so little time dealing with images here instead of at commons that I'm not sure what the right venue is. —

3625: 3109: 2656: 3836:

Hi SMcCandlish/Archive 38, I would like to invite you and anyone watching who shares an interest in moving forward constructively to

702:

3) Read (and when you get the gist of it, participate in) admin discussions regularly (every time you log in). The main ones are at

6062: 6033: 5952: 5905: 5876: 5769: 5719: 5586: 5480: 5422: 5357: 5319: 5132: 5057: 4947: 4785: 4670: 4497: 4412: 4322: 4216: 4150: 4103: 4024: 3902: 3764: 3704: 3650: 3588: 3520: 3434: 3381: 3135: 3055: 2976: 2933: 2850: 2805: 2778: 2691: 2623: 2561: 2471: 2340: 2244: 2216: 2134: 2089: 2051: 2047: 1985: 1921: 1854: 1755: 1661: 1532: 1486: 1321: 1202: 1125: 1030: 938: 864: 763: 557: 473: 420: 393: 336: 268: 227: 157: 2962:

I've never seen anything quite like it, other than an RfA that had a bunch of sockpuppet attacks in it. Definitely a weird one. —

4244:

seems to be a good place to discuss this. Feel free to move this discussion there, including copying anything I have written here.

3848:

some 48,000 articles about living people as created by those 17,500 editors, through our proper cleanup, expansion, and sourcing.

2009: 1949: 1641:

I must have misunderstood something then, because the template in question was mostly using the term "editintro" but then later "

1596:

I believe that this was your only reason to request the move, which is why I moved it right back. If I'm wrong, please say so. :)

1573: 815: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 5216:

Finally, isn’t there just a touch of the bureaucratic doublespeak to the justification that it should be eliminated because of

3420:

Sorry; wasn't aware what the correct place was. I have had no interaction with SUL or bureaucrats for any reason before now. —

3397:

is not for discussing SUL or problems with your SUL account that cannot be resolved on this Knowledge (XXG). I just checked on

2290: 6014:

the queue names. I'm sorry that the incomplete renaming process caused you some consternation, but neither I nor anyone else

5339:

I'm going to flag this topic as "resolved" here (unless a user-specific issue needs to be raised) and redirect discussion to

4277:

Number of files isn't relevant, since that's not the rationale at all. The rationale is that the file name doubles as a file

4198:(usually images, but also videos), then it might be better to discuss it somewhere pertaining to that instead of the general 4372:

Generally, never unless the template's documentation says to do so, or if the template spits up an error message usually in

3574:

That may well be the case! It's not a big deal to me, really, or my 2nd RfA would have been in like Nov. 2007 or so. Heh. —

684: 5183:— misunderstood, please clarify it for me. Afterall it is that wrapping that makes this template singularly different from 4054:", or we may not use the image. So if we don't like the license, then our only other option is to not use the image at all. 5809: 5465: 5340: 4527: 2321: 599: 5473: 4162: 2286: 1594:, however, use that on edit notices, so we don't need a special template for that (or at least not one that complicated). 5999: 4871: 4841: 4733: 4709: 4535: 4510: 2948: 2722:

Hello SMcCandlish, I was reviewing the history of your RfA, and noticed that you removed my and another user's comments

377:, but I have thick skin, and I can't keep everyone happy all the time. I've come a long way in the intervening years. — 4241: 4861: 4699: 4685:

First off, all that matters to me is the multiple-sentence wrapper component, the gap that the template fills between

4398:. Most of the rest aren't. Some of the XfD templates are (others aren't, for some reason). It's complicated. :-) — 2298: 1624: 1454: 1386: 1364: 885: 736: 5628:

A little background may help. In the the past year or so, ArbCom and others have vastly altered the fundamentals of

4199: 4133: 3121:

I took it off, at your suggestion. The question didn't bother me any, but if you don't like it, away it goes! :-) —

1360: 717: 5649:; but this is not a novelty. Rather, it mirrors an approach which seems to be proving useful in other cases -- see 2394: 1393: 1356: 1335: 193: 5802: 5458: 2531:

reason to be neutral, since we have vehemently disagreed (I think I've even been at loggerheads with Pmanderson at

1803:

Not only is the above true (that you have new messages at my talk page), but were you aware of the above template (

592: 189: 38: 5755:

As I said, I'm going to decline involvement in this situation, so please don't send any more messages about it. —

5650: 5280:

went this direction, virtually no one thought about doing this any further and applying it to everything based on

5217: 4983: 4975: 4926: 747:

Thanks. Doing a lot of this stuff already, and you're right about RfA as a "hang out". I really don't go there! —

536:? I'll continue working on the stuff at the /Coaching page and look into paring down my "default 3" answers at my 1828: 1797: 795: 519: 131: 4962:

To be honest, I only recently discovered that there were optional parameters to it. I had always used it thusly:

3605:

pay attention to what people said, and use this as an opportunity to improve yourself as an editor. Regards, --

3491:

Hi SMcCandlish, I've asked an RFA question. If you had a moment to answer it, that would be much appreciated. -

987: 537: 448: 5938:

to be contentious enough for that, but I'm happy either way, as long as we end up with one unified template. —

5841: 5082: 4851: 4584: 4566: 4556: 4542: 4114:

Could you be convinced to care about it a bit? And maybe get this settled once and for all? It also came up at

3031: 2517: 2279: 913: 529: 1790: 5996: 4268: 4062: 3974: 2945: 2660: 1894: 404:

PS: Anyway, I wasn't certain if your quiz was part of some larger process or just for your own curiosity. —

2944:

I was going to say go for it, but it doesn't seem you'll make it. Hopefully it will work out next time. –

1642: 5740:

I sent you an e-mail. Follow-up actions become the proof that constructive criticism is well-received. --

5491: 5376: 5236: 5014: 4884: 4815: 4747: 4605: 4471: 3619: 3398: 3103: 2302: 1883: 1614: 1584: 3445:

No problem. In general, if you have questions about things that concern crat tasks, you can do so at the

2759: 668: 6056: 6027: 5946: 5899: 5870: 5763: 5713: 5633: 5580: 5416: 5351: 5313: 5126: 5051: 4941: 4779: 4664: 4491: 4406: 4316: 4210: 4144: 4097: 4018: 3896: 3758: 3698: 3644: 3582: 3514: 3428: 3375: 3129: 3049: 3026: 2970: 2927: 2844: 2799: 2772: 2685: 2617: 2555: 2465: 2334: 2238: 2210: 2173: 2128: 2083: 1979: 1915: 1848: 1807: 1749: 1655: 1526: 1480: 1315: 1196: 1119: 1024: 932: 858: 757: 551: 467: 414: 387: 330: 262: 238:

I figured you didn't need them, but I just wanted to double check. I deleted the other two for you. --

221: 151: 47: 17: 3814: 1963: 1709: 374: 369: 1376: 5991:

queue names without prior discussion. You messed up the delsort tool. In particular, you must update

3962:" which made it so that images fed to that template would not be linked. I had to revert your edit. 3496: 2823: 2733: 2006: 1946: 1824: 1817: 1768: 1729: 1716: 812: 532:

page and am working through it. Dweller, do you want to just add a co-nom with Fughettaboutit's, at

515: 127: 5988: 5615:

You identify the very things which I complained about in e-mails last week. I don't know about the

5221: 5173: 5092: 4987: 4979: 4930: 4649: 3394: 3345: 5925: 5852: 5438: 5398: 4808:

It was very alarming inasmuch as this is one of my favorite templates. (Scroll down ↓ for more.) —

4429: 4382: 4362: 4115: 2510: 2356: 2310: 2166: 2107: 2061: 1507: 1372: 1276: 1261: 909: 243: 201: 5636:

illustrate a case-in-point, serving to explain why I'm investigating outside the box alternatives.

5030:

No worries. The highlighting/underlining: See the TfD for some of it. Doing stuff that gets the

3998: 2541: 2537: 2200:

Doesn't matter. There are non-mainstream Christians and that is not an article on Christianity. —

4264: 4058: 3970: 3562: 2908: 2893: 2449: 2431: 2190: 1891: 1673: 1631: 1599: 609: 5305:

been nuked. Editors will still use the wrapping functionality because it's useful to editors. —

3733:

Didn't get around to it in time, and many non-copyediting issues had already been raised anyway.

2755: 1516:

I know what you mean about all that LOLSPEAK. Drives me nuts. I even made a userbox about it. —

1415: 1411: 881: 485: 1440: 1407: 188:

I deleted all of your user space deletion requests. I also deleted these two user talk pages,

5632:

without adequately anticipating the unintended consequences. The remedies ArbCom crafted for

5567:

and follow some guidance on how to be a constructive editor here. Becoming absorbed with the

5487: 5371: 5231: 5009: 4879: 4810: 4742: 4715:

template, hit preview, saw the “citation needed” at the end of the last sentence wrapped, but

4600: 4466: 4392: 4118:. We should maybe consult with Godwin and come up with a determination one way or the other. – 3679: 3608: 3402:

pages or noticeboards instead to allow the changing username boards to work smoothly. Regards

3092: 2597: 1236: 1177: 1162: 1042: 991: 497: 437: 358: 308: 6045: 6015: 5992: 5619:, but the rest of his critical commentary resonated as comforting, reassuring and supportive. 2672: 2320:

That's a template code issue not user behavior (template usage) issue, really. Took it up at

2100:

Good stuff! Your query about the length of time to load my talk page has also been resolved!

899: 489: 6051: 6022: 5941: 5894: 5865: 5758: 5745: 5708: 5695: 5575: 5548: 5537: 5526: 5411: 5346: 5308: 5294: 5121: 5046: 4936: 4774: 4659: 4486: 4401: 4311: 4205: 4139: 4092: 4013: 3952: 3891: 3753: 3693: 3639: 3577: 3509: 3492: 3423: 3370: 3124: 3044: 3019: 2965: 2921: 2838: 2793: 2766: 2679: 2611: 2549: 2459: 2405: 2328: 2232: 2204: 2181: 2122: 2077: 1973: 1909: 1842: 1838:

Yarp. Wanted something more plain-texty. It's the blue swath effect I was unhappy with. —

1743: 1649: 1520: 1474: 1309: 1190: 1113: 1018: 926: 852: 751: 691:

Help fulfill Wikipedian requests, and/or participate in the corresponding discussions. See

545: 461: 408: 381: 324: 256: 215: 145: 6011: 5917: 5888: 4986:, “pointing to deficiencies in the article that should be corrected promptly?” And, as for 4911: 4187: 4179: 3197: 3148: 2751: 2532: 1872: 983: 707: 676: 660: 656: 648: 4301: 3456: 3409: 2817: 2727: 2001: 1941: 1725: 1099: 807: 4191: 3671: 3446: 703: 692: 6068: 6039: 6004: 5958: 5929: 5911: 5882: 5856: 5775: 5749: 5725: 5699: 5646: 5592: 5552: 5501: 5442: 5428: 5402: 5382: 5363: 5325: 5242: 5138: 5063: 5020: 4953: 4890: 4821: 4791: 4753: 4676: 4645:

is useful for flagging one fact (often just a clause, not a sentence) as unsourced, and

4611: 4503: 4477: 4433: 4418: 4366: 4328: 4272: 4222: 4173: 4156: 4126: 4109: 4066: 4030: 3978: 3917: 3908: 3881: 3770: 3750:

I'll try to have a look at it in the morning (my time; it's about 11:20ish p.m. now). —

3744: 3710: 3683: 3656: 3631: 3594: 3566: 3526: 3500: 3462: 3440: 3415: 3387: 3141: 3115: 3089:

as it is a bit of an unfair question in hindsight, I'm happy for it to be withdrawn. --

3061: 2982: 2951: 2939: 2912: 2897: 2856: 2829: 2811: 2784: 2739: 2697: 2664: 2629: 2601: 2567: 2524: 2477: 2436: 2412: 2360: 2346: 2314: 2250: 2222: 2194: 2140: 2113: 2095: 2067: 2014: 1991: 1959:

Glad it is liked. I afeared it would be TfDed instantly as redundant (I'd actually nuke

1954: 1927: 1899: 1860: 1832: 1761: 1733: 1678: 1667: 1636: 1604: 1538: 1511: 1492: 1327: 1280: 1265: 1208: 1181: 1166: 1131: 1103: 1059: 1036: 1008: 971: 944: 917: 870: 820: 769: 741: 613: 563: 523: 501: 479: 441: 426: 399: 362: 342: 312: 274: 247: 233: 205: 163: 135: 5921: 5848: 5831: 5434: 5394: 4425: 4358: 4171: 4124: 3739: 2352: 2306: 2102: 2056: 1503: 1368: 1272: 1257: 239: 197: 5369:

Agreed! Going here and going there was keeping me up way, Way, WAY past my bedtime. —

4971: 4580:

contiguous sentence (i.e., a block) that needs references. Otherwise, you have to put

4183: 4994: 4919: 4689: 4639: 4625: 4002: 3851:

These constructive proposals might then be considered by the community as a whole at

3558: 2904: 2889: 2427: 2186: 605: 4617:

I don't understand what you are getting at. All I did is remove code redundancy. It

5821: 5284: 5274: 5224:? I love the idea of merger, but would hope that when it is used as a wrapper, the 5112: 4900: 3675: 2593: 1173: 1158: 493: 433: 354: 304: 4594:

sentence. Before making such dramatic changes, you should have read the talk page

1359:

and suspect we are editing at cross-purposes. The template you are reinstating (

889: 844:

This message is to confirm to ACRI admins that I did indeed request access to the

699:

2) Read all of Knowledge (XXG)'s policies, guidelines, and policy-related essays.

2397:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2151:

Re: "the idea that Jesus and God are separate persons" (your recent edit summary)

5741: 5691: 5544: 5260: 5187: 5159: 4073: 3281: 1672:

Yes, I've added a disclaimer that edit notices are a different concept. Cheers,

1446: 1090: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5983:

My response was never replied to, and I don't care about the issue any further.

888:

on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in as well as the

447:

completely unimpeachable admin record, even if it's not tremendously long. At

5629: 5206:

not just the last sentence/phrase, I would glady change to support the merger.

4970:. The only thing I had been doing recently was to change where it referred to 3864:

User:Ikip/Discussion about creation of possible Wikiproject:New Users and BLPs

3451: 3449:, which will usually both be quicker and generate better answers. :-) Regards 3404: 3223: 1580:

tag doesn't work if an editintro is displayed, which is why we can't just use

1406:. This is completely different from a case where an a article topic, such as 1095: 637:

Don't be in a hurry, and don't hang around RfA (it's a tangent/distraction).

5602: 4166: 4119: 3914: 3878: 3211: 3188: 2816:

Thanks very much for your prompt reply. :) Best of luck in the coming days,

5540:, I cite this as a plausible context for discussing what I have in mind. 4194:, and doesn't really relate much to copyright. If this issue is only about 877: 5179:

without the bother of a TfD. I mean what will be left of it? If I have —

3940:

Will participate in discussion/comment on proposal at an appropriate forum

1402:

spelling of, not alternative spelling for, the title of a published work,

5616: 5559: 5393:

What Tfd for this template? And where did you see a conclusion to merge?

5343:; it's too hard to have this discussion in three different places. :-) — 3913:(refactored invitation) sorry about that, I was naive, and made a mistake 3853:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

5645:

Your examples of misplaced activity include creating subpages -- see

5341:

Template talk:Citation needed#Merge from Template:Reference necessary

5266:(and every other inline template of this sort for that matter!). It 5098:

are to make this as easy as possible. There's no reason at all that

4528:

Template talk:Citation needed#Merge from Template:Reference necessary

4378:

if you try to use it without subst. Any user-warning templates like

1355:

Howdy. I notice you've un-done a few changes I made to the redirect

845: 884:

to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join

586:

Replied there; don't need more talkbacks, as I watch list that page.

3674:

in say, six months' time, please drop me a line and let me know. --

643:

1) Start doing non-sysop administrative activities. Things like...

5687: 3718:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Flag of Japan/archive2

4576:

sentence that needs references, this template is for indicating

4297:. Just want to get back to my coding. And to have problems with 4255:

you find the right page in a quicker way. So what's the problem?

2903:

I strongly advise you to do something about that signature. :-)

5686:

Your reasoning and your writing were very welcome. Like other

5197:{{fact|1=Several sentences with a total of 4 unsourced claims}} 1890:

I like this MUCH better than those gaudy blue talkback bars. –

733:

Take your time, help Wikipedians, and adminship will find you.

2455:

on it yourself, I think. Happy new one to you as well. :-) —

713:

4) Read everything pertaining to admin duties, starting with:

25: 6044:

PS: I have also informed the move discussion over there that

2675:, as it is frankly the principal source of his notability. — 1410:, a type of ball game (hypothetically) is attestably spelled 1249:

odd for Fowler to write a sentence "Or not" just like that).

6010:

Sorry about that. I assume it's all fine now? NB: You don't

5813:

at Template_talk:Userspace_draft#Merge_two_tags's talk page.

3245: 2172: 1871: 970: 5532:

Perhaps you might consider taking a look at an old edit at

4929:, and is also a subtle ignoring of important rationales as 4260:

That's the actual number of files at the time I write this.

1996:

Agreed. It's much too colorful and large and bold and such.

1301:, but a mention that Fowler quoted someone else, a copy of 3809: 922:

Thanks. I will and watch a lot before I touch anything. —

647:

Close non-controversial deletion discussions (XfDs). See

2399:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

1444:, however, were the title of a work, such as a sequel to 432:

happy to nominate you today, if you'll accept the nom. --

5916:

That's right. I wanted to make sure you were aware that

1305:

quotation (probably whole), and why Fowler quoted it. —

5887:

Oh, actually, that one's for merges being discussed at

5664: 5533: 4461: 3945: 3821: 2723: 979: 484:

More good responses. OK, well read through the manual (

5078:

PS: What I hope is that it will simply be merged into

2322:

Template talk:Userspace draft#Date categorization code

4388:

are substituted. So are user welcome templates like

3348:: Not a rename user request, but something different 1271:

quoted text and which is comment by another editor?

534:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/SMcCandlish 2

4982:. Why would it not fit under the last exception to 4548:. But, the purpose of this template is meant to be 528:Cool beans. I've added the Malinaccier stuff to my 5543:Please contact me by e-mail or on my talk page. -- 5534:Knowledge (XXG):Mentorship#Unintended consequences 5256:What I'm saying is: Port the wrapping function to 2425:Speedy it if rules allow. Happy new year, btw. // 2295:User:SMcCandlish/List of World Blackball Champions 1186:Will do. Was thinking this afternoon, actually. — 990:, and feel free to ask if you have any questions. 351:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/SMcCandlish 349:How would you respond to the criticisms of you at 5484:at Template talk:Reference necessary's talk page. 4043:books and newspapers etc to use less attribution. 2054:, and also the main championship pages. Regards. 1297:My rede was that none of it is a quote of Fowler 4132:the other. Where would you like to take this? 3183: 640:If you'd like to be an admin (janitor), then... 4089:in templates, don't worry about it; I won't. — 3838:a discussion about Biographies of Living People 5469:at Template talk:Citation needed's talk page. 776:An open proposal for a WikiProject Talk Pages 603:at Talk:2009 Championship League's talk page. 8: 5525:I write because you participated in editing 978:Hi, just wanted to let you know that I have 1722:Message added 19:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC). 880:. Before you do so, please read the tool's 3795: 3168: 1450:, both the 2nd and 3rd spellings would be 1172:Pls let me know when you transclude it. -- 898:request the account creator permission at 794:I noticed some edits you recently made to 492:) and drop me a line when you're ready. -- 3312:Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers 3182: 2718:Repaired; probably a temporary Db glitch. 2509:distracted by accusations of canvassing. 2291:User:SMcCandlish/Comparison of cue sports 1867:Thought I would try this out. Well done! 1392:; fixed. The issue at that redir is that 1367:for a list of the main ones) ? Cheers - 5118:for very similar multi-functionality. — 3812: 3326:Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques 5817:BTW, are you aware that there exists a 1563:Fine by me, as long as it's consistent. 126:Have you checked your email recently?-- 4423:Fair enough, will tread carefully. -- 4294: 2917:Yep, I believe you, on every point. — 910:-- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) 454:User:Malinaccier/The four phase system 353:? Did you withdraw your nomination? -- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5193:. I mean, I see your formatting above 4483:No worries; I do it sometimes too! — 2995:Just thought I'd stop by to say hello 488:is a good place to (re?)start, as is 7: 2994: 2180:According to mainstream traditional 1610:Two edit intros where this is used: 5920:discusses template merges as well. 5891:, which I don't think these are. — 5563:indefinitely blocked is for you to 4857:, it is insufficient. I cannot use 3791:Declined; responded at RfC already. 2287:User:SMcCandlish/Chinese eight-ball 5538:mentor deemed acceptable by ArbCom 4116:Template talk:Asbox#Image alt text 3149:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter 1969:first; it is huge and hideous). — 1936:Yeah, me too! Thanks for the idea! 846:account creation request interface 826:Account creation request interface 24: 5088:. Some of the edits I've made to 4076:for about 8 years. I understand 3985:suggest that one must provide an 2504:Moot; RfA closed 23 January 2010. 2052:2010 BDO World Darts Championship 2048:2010 PDC World Darts Championship 5974: 5801: 5787: 5512: 5472: 5457: 4517: 4447: 4342: 4178:Well, its name sounds good, but 3931: 3813: 3782: 3724: 3538: 3478: 3353: 3222: 3210: 3187: 3155: 3075: 3000: 2874: 2709: 2641: 2579: 2495: 2374: 2299:User:SMcCandlish/Russian pyramid 2262: 2156: 2032: 1789: 1775: 1708: 1694: 1554: 1342: 1222: 1143: 1073: 958: 831: 781: 624: 591: 577: 290: 175: 113: 29: 5433:I must have misunderstood you. 4867:, it overstates the situation. 4242:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Copyrights 1801:at Fuhghettaboutit's talk page. 1361:Template:Redir from misspelling 5862:Hadn't noticed. Thanks. :-) — 4442:Categorization of User Sandbox 2395:Template:Interwiki links table 1433:R from alternative punctuation 710:, but there are many others. 194:User talk:SMcCandlish/Sandbox7 1: 5995:after any change. Thank you. 4285:, but the attribution was at 3307:Featured editor: Teeninvestor 190:User talk:SMcCandlish/Infobox 6069:20:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 6040:18:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 6005:16:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5959:20:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5930:20:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5912:18:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5883:18:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5857:11:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5827:template? I notice you used 5776:21:20, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 5750:20:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 5726:03:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 5700:21:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5593:19:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5553:02:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 5502:20:52, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5443:18:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5429:18:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5403:16:52, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5383:20:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5364:15:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5326:15:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5243:08:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5139:08:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5064:08:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 5021:07:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 4954:06:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 4891:06:45, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 4877:filled the gap perfectly. — 4822:08:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 4792:08:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 4754:07:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 4677:06:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 4612:06:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 4511:Template:Reference necessary 4504:21:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 4478:21:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 4434:16:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 4419:16:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 4367:16:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 4329:20:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4273:20:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4223:19:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4182:is just a munged summary of 4174:19:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4157:18:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4127:18:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4110:18:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4067:18:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4031:17:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3979:16:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3918:04:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 3909:06:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3882:05:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3835: 3801:WikiProject new user welcome 3771:06:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3745:03:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 3711:15:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC) 3684:11:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC) 3657:14:44, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 3632:14:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 3595:14:44, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 3567:13:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 3527:15:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3501:15:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3463:14:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3441:14:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3416:14:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3388:13:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3293:News items and announcements 3266: 3142:01:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3116:22:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 3062:16:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 3032:16:08, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2983:06:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 2952:21:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2940:15:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2913:15:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2898:15:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2857:15:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2830:15:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2812:15:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2785:15:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2740:15:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2698:08:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2665:07:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2630:01:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2602:23:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 2568:22:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 2525:22:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 2478:03:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 2437:23:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 2413:08:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 2361:21:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 2347:20:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 2315:13:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 2251:20:41, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 2223:01:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 2195:20:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 2141:09:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 2114:05:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 2096:05:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 2068:05:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 2015:09:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1992:06:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1955:02:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1928:02:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1900:02:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1861:02:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1833:00:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1762:20:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1734:19:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1679:19:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1668:19:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1637:19:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1605:19:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1539:20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1512:20:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1493:16:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1377:16:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1328:10:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 1281:10:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 1266:10:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 1209:18:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1182:12:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1167:10:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 1132:17:39, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 1104:09:29, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 1068:Not the right David Gottlieb 1060:14:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 1037:14:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 1009:14:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 988:Knowledge (XXG):Autoreviewer 986:. For more information see 945:14:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 918:14:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 871:06:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 821:08:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 770:23:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC) 742:22:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC) 728:Administrators' reading list 723:Administrators' how-to guide 5837:templates both here and on 5300:only something one applies 4534:I just saw what you did to 4526:Centralizing discussion at 3280: 3275:articles should be deleted. 3070:My "controversial" question 3041:Anyway, have a good one. — 1465:R from alternative spelling 1423:R from alternative spelling 1365:Category:Redirect templates 1334:Templates on redirect page 1333: 614:23:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 564:14:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 524:13:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 502:13:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 480:12:21, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 442:12:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 427:11:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 400:11:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 363:11:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 343:11:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 313:11:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 275:09:36, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 248:08:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 234:08:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 206:08:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 164:17:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC) 141:I have not! Will do so. — 136:15:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC) 6085: 5972: 5785: 5510: 5228:would appear.<sigh: --> 4515: 4445: 4340: 3929: 3845: 3780: 3722: 3536: 3476: 3351: 3254:The community is currently 3153: 3073: 2998: 2872: 2707: 2639: 2577: 2538:WP:CANVAS#Friendly notices 2493: 2372: 2260: 2154: 2030: 1773: 1720:at SchuminWeb's talk page. 1692: 1552: 1340: 1220: 1141: 1071: 956: 829: 779: 622: 575: 538:User:SMcCandlish/RfA draft 449:User:SMcCandlish/RfA draft 288: 173: 111: 5290:. Like, why on earth is 4726:No matter what, it means 3186: 2073:I'm already on it! :-) — 1394:Jimmy White's 2: Cue Ball 1357:Jimmy White's 2: Cue Ball 1336:Jimmy White's 2: Cue Ball 1041:No problemo! Take care, 953:Your autoreviewer request 796:Talk:electronic cigarette 530:User:SMcCandlish/Coaching 5169:is effectively deleting 2275:I noticed you added the 2257:Userspace draft template 1884:MalnadachBot's talk page 1549:Editintro vs. Editnotice 1404:Jimmy White's 2: Cueball 6048:needs to be updated. — 5987:Do not make changes to 5536:? In the search for a 4550:fundamentally different 3987:actively clickable link 3207:Issue 2 (January 2010) 3198:Article Rescue Squadron 1784:Misc. notices and chat. 1574:Editintro documentation 1286:Fowler wrote more than 1256:Thanks and best wishes 790:Supported, at nom page. 303:Blast from the past. -- 5226:the subtle underlining 5203:the subtle underlining 5200: 5167:the subtle underlining 4964:{{Reference necessary| 3944:Hi SMcCandlish. Today 3636:Thanks. I will. :-) — 2177: 1880:You have new messages 1876: 975: 886:#wikipedia-en-accounts 5201:but do not see, with 5194: 5155:But, merging it with 4966:Passage to be sourced 3777:Discussion invitation 3393:Please remember that 2758:for the amusement of 2592:Mail. Got. You've. -- 2176: 1875: 974: 661:patrol recent changes 42:of past discussions. 18:User talk:SMcCandlish 5108:shouldn't work. Cf. 4729:I owe you an apology 4635:that are the issue. 4621:looked exactly like 3447:relevant noticeboard 2303:User:Betodd/XSMotion 1878:Hello, SMcCandlish. 1769:Template:Whisperback 1438:, respectively . If 5969:DELSORT queue names 5934:Right. Didn't seem 5389:Reference necessary 4872:Reference necessary 4842:Reference necessary 4710:Reference necessary 4291:Attrib:FooBarBaz123 4083:I don't really care 3399:sulutil:SMcCandlish 2704:RfA comment removal 2167:Talk:Triple deities 2165:Redirected back to 984:new page patrollers 5229:Thanks Stanton! — 4862:Refimprove section 4700:Refimprove section 4572:is for indicating 4287:Attrib:843lsFFx9dP 4165:would be better. – 2445:You'd have to put 2369:Endorsed as author 2178: 1877: 1625:Disambig editintro 1455:R from misspelling 1387:R from misspelling 1086:Hello SMcCandlish 976: 657:Clean up vandalism 6066: 6037: 6002: 5956: 5909: 5880: 5773: 5723: 5590: 5426: 5361: 5323: 5136: 5061: 4951: 4789: 4769:&action=purge 4674: 4501: 4432: 4416: 4365: 4326: 4283:File:FooBarBaz123 4220: 4154: 4107: 4028: 3906: 3875: 3874: 3871: 3870: 3826:add this project 3768: 3743: 3708: 3654: 3592: 3524: 3438: 3385: 3340: 3339: 3335: 3334: 3287: 3286: 3236: 3235: 3232: 3231: 3139: 3059: 2980: 2937: 2854: 2809: 2782: 2695: 2671:summarize it per 2627: 2565: 2490:RfA notifications 2475: 2344: 2248: 2220: 2138: 2093: 1989: 1925: 1858: 1759: 1665: 1536: 1490: 1382:Obvious typo for 1325: 1237:Elegant variation 1217:Elegant variation 1206: 1129: 1034: 942: 868: 767: 738:The Transhumanist 685:Wikiquette alerts 561: 477: 424: 397: 340: 272: 231: 161: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6076: 6067: 6061: 6060: 6038: 6032: 6031: 6000: 5984: 5978: 5977: 5957: 5951: 5950: 5910: 5904: 5903: 5881: 5875: 5874: 5846: 5840: 5836: 5830: 5826: 5820: 5814: 5812: 5805: 5797: 5791: 5790: 5774: 5768: 5767: 5724: 5718: 5717: 5591: 5585: 5584: 5527:Teachable moment 5522: 5516: 5515: 5485: 5483: 5476: 5470: 5468: 5461: 5427: 5421: 5420: 5379: 5374: 5362: 5356: 5355: 5324: 5318: 5317: 5299: 5293: 5289: 5283: 5279: 5273: 5265: 5259: 5239: 5234: 5227: 5218:WP:NODISCLAIMERS 5204: 5198: 5192: 5186: 5178: 5172: 5168: 5165:and eliminating 5164: 5158: 5137: 5131: 5130: 5117: 5111: 5103: 5097: 5091: 5087: 5081: 5062: 5056: 5055: 5017: 5012: 4999: 4993: 4984:WP:NODISCLAIMERS 4976:WP:NODISCLAIMERS 4969: 4952: 4946: 4945: 4927:WP:NODISCLAIMERS 4924: 4918: 4905: 4899: 4887: 4882: 4876: 4870: 4866: 4860: 4856: 4850: 4846: 4840: 4818: 4813: 4790: 4784: 4783: 4770: 4766: 4765:&action=edit 4750: 4745: 4714: 4708: 4704: 4698: 4694: 4688: 4675: 4669: 4668: 4656:the issue is. — 4654: 4648: 4644: 4638: 4630: 4624: 4608: 4603: 4589: 4583: 4571: 4565: 4561: 4555: 4547: 4541: 4531: 4521: 4520: 4502: 4496: 4495: 4474: 4469: 4457: 4451: 4450: 4424: 4417: 4411: 4410: 4397: 4391: 4387: 4381: 4377: 4357: 4352: 4346: 4345: 4327: 4321: 4320: 4306: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4221: 4215: 4214: 4155: 4149: 4148: 4108: 4102: 4101: 4088: 4072:WikiMedia's own 4029: 4023: 4022: 3961: 3957: 3951: 3941: 3935: 3934: 3907: 3901: 3900: 3858:Please help us: 3832: 3817: 3810: 3796: 3792: 3786: 3785: 3769: 3763: 3762: 3742: 3734: 3728: 3727: 3709: 3703: 3702: 3655: 3649: 3648: 3628: 3622: 3614: 3611: 3593: 3587: 3586: 3548: 3542: 3541: 3525: 3519: 3518: 3488: 3487:Answered at RfA. 3482: 3481: 3459: 3454: 3439: 3433: 3432: 3412: 3407: 3386: 3380: 3379: 3363: 3357: 3356: 3261:deciding whether 3250: 3249: 3246: 3227: 3226: 3214: 3191: 3184: 3180: 3179: 3173:Extended content 3169: 3165: 3159: 3158: 3140: 3134: 3133: 3112: 3106: 3098: 3095: 3085: 3079: 3078: 3060: 3054: 3053: 3029: 3024: 3010: 3004: 3003: 2981: 2975: 2974: 2938: 2932: 2931: 2884: 2878: 2877: 2855: 2849: 2848: 2826: 2820: 2810: 2804: 2803: 2783: 2777: 2776: 2736: 2730: 2719: 2713: 2712: 2696: 2690: 2689: 2651: 2645: 2644: 2628: 2622: 2621: 2589: 2583: 2582: 2566: 2560: 2559: 2520: 2505: 2499: 2498: 2476: 2470: 2469: 2454: 2448: 2434: 2415: 2384: 2378: 2377: 2345: 2339: 2338: 2284: 2278: 2272: 2266: 2265: 2249: 2243: 2242: 2221: 2215: 2214: 2170: 2160: 2159: 2139: 2133: 2132: 2112: 2110: 2105: 2094: 2088: 2087: 2066: 2064: 2059: 2042: 2036: 2035: 2013: 1990: 1984: 1983: 1968: 1962: 1953: 1926: 1920: 1919: 1887: 1879: 1859: 1853: 1852: 1822: 1816: 1813:) when you made 1812: 1806: 1802: 1800: 1793: 1785: 1779: 1778: 1760: 1754: 1753: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1712: 1704: 1698: 1697: 1676: 1666: 1660: 1659: 1634: 1629: 1623: 1619: 1613: 1602: 1589: 1583: 1578: 1572: 1564: 1558: 1557: 1537: 1531: 1530: 1491: 1485: 1484: 1469: 1463: 1459: 1453: 1437: 1431: 1427: 1421: 1391: 1385: 1352: 1346: 1345: 1326: 1320: 1319: 1239:article it had: 1232: 1226: 1225: 1207: 1201: 1200: 1153: 1147: 1146: 1130: 1124: 1123: 1083: 1077: 1076: 1057: 1035: 1029: 1028: 1006: 968: 962: 961: 943: 937: 936: 869: 863: 862: 841: 835: 834: 819: 791: 785: 784: 768: 762: 761: 634: 628: 627: 604: 602: 595: 587: 581: 580: 562: 556: 555: 478: 472: 471: 425: 419: 418: 398: 392: 391: 341: 335: 334: 300: 294: 293: 273: 267: 266: 232: 226: 225: 185: 179: 178: 162: 156: 155: 123: 117: 116: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6084: 6083: 6079: 6078: 6077: 6075: 6074: 6073: 6055: 6049: 6026: 6020: 6016:need permission 5985: 5982: 5980: 5975: 5971: 5945: 5939: 5898: 5892: 5869: 5863: 5844: 5842:Citation needed 5838: 5834: 5828: 5824: 5818: 5807: 5800: 5798: 5795: 5793: 5788: 5784: 5782:Template merges 5762: 5756: 5738: 5712: 5706: 5579: 5573: 5523: 5520: 5518: 5513: 5509: 5478: 5471: 5463: 5456: 5453: 5415: 5409: 5391: 5377: 5372: 5350: 5344: 5312: 5306: 5297: 5291: 5287: 5281: 5277: 5271: 5263: 5257: 5237: 5232: 5225: 5202: 5196: 5190: 5184: 5176: 5170: 5166: 5162: 5156: 5125: 5119: 5115: 5109: 5101: 5095: 5089: 5085: 5083:Citation needed 5079: 5050: 5044: 5015: 5010: 4997: 4991: 4963: 4940: 4934: 4922: 4916: 4903: 4897: 4885: 4880: 4874: 4868: 4864: 4858: 4854: 4852:Citation needed 4848: 4844: 4838: 4816: 4811: 4778: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4748: 4743: 4712: 4706: 4702: 4696: 4692: 4686: 4663: 4657: 4652: 4646: 4642: 4636: 4628: 4622: 4606: 4601: 4587: 4585:Citation needed 4581: 4569: 4567:Citation needed 4563: 4559: 4557:Citation needed 4553: 4545: 4543:Citation needed 4539: 4532: 4525: 4523: 4518: 4514: 4490: 4484: 4472: 4467: 4458: 4455: 4453: 4448: 4444: 4405: 4399: 4395: 4389: 4385: 4379: 4376: 4373: 4353: 4350: 4348: 4343: 4339: 4315: 4309: 4304: 4298: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4209: 4203: 4143: 4137: 4096: 4090: 4086: 4017: 4011: 3994:in the volume). 3959: 3955: 3949: 3942: 3939: 3937: 3932: 3928: 3895: 3889: 3876: 3867: 3833: 3819: 3804: 3793: 3790: 3788: 3783: 3779: 3757: 3751: 3735: 3732: 3730: 3725: 3721: 3697: 3691: 3667: 3643: 3637: 3626: 3620: 3612: 3609: 3581: 3575: 3554: 3549: 3546: 3544: 3539: 3535: 3513: 3507: 3497:Ta bu shi da yu 3489: 3486: 3484: 3479: 3475: 3457: 3452: 3427: 3421: 3410: 3405: 3374: 3368: 3364: 3361: 3359: 3354: 3350: 3341: 3336: 3242: 3209: 3174: 3166: 3163: 3161: 3156: 3152: 3128: 3122: 3110: 3104: 3096: 3093: 3086: 3083: 3081: 3076: 3072: 3048: 3042: 3027: 3020: 3011: 3008: 3006: 3001: 2997: 2969: 2963: 2926: 2924: 2918: 2885: 2882: 2880: 2875: 2871: 2843: 2841: 2835: 2824: 2818: 2798: 2796: 2790: 2771: 2769: 2763: 2734: 2728: 2720: 2717: 2715: 2710: 2706: 2684: 2682: 2676: 2652: 2649: 2647: 2642: 2638: 2616: 2614: 2608: 2590: 2587: 2585: 2580: 2576: 2554: 2552: 2546: 2518: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2496: 2492: 2464: 2462: 2456: 2452: 2446: 2432: 2408: 2402: 2401:. Thank you. — 2385: 2382: 2380: 2375: 2371: 2351:See you there. 2333: 2331: 2325: 2282: 2280:Userspace draft 2276: 2273: 2270: 2268: 2263: 2259: 2237: 2235: 2229: 2209: 2207: 2201: 2171: 2164: 2162: 2157: 2153: 2127: 2125: 2119: 2108: 2103: 2101: 2082: 2080: 2074: 2062: 2057: 2055: 2043: 2040: 2038: 2033: 2029: 1999: 1978: 1976: 1970: 1966: 1960: 1939: 1914: 1912: 1906: 1888: 1881: 1870: 1847: 1845: 1839: 1825:Fuhghettaboutit 1820: 1814: 1810: 1804: 1795: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1776: 1772: 1748: 1746: 1740: 1721: 1714: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1700: 1695: 1691: 1674: 1654: 1652: 1646: 1632: 1627: 1621: 1617: 1611: 1600: 1587: 1581: 1576: 1570: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1555: 1551: 1525: 1523: 1517: 1479: 1477: 1471: 1467: 1461: 1457: 1451: 1435: 1429: 1425: 1419: 1389: 1383: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1343: 1339: 1314: 1312: 1306: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1223: 1219: 1195: 1193: 1187: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1144: 1140: 1118: 1116: 1110: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1074: 1070: 1053: 1049: 1043: 1023: 1021: 1015: 1002: 998: 992: 969: 966: 964: 959: 955: 931: 929: 923: 857: 855: 849: 842: 839: 837: 832: 828: 805: 792: 789: 787: 782: 778: 756: 754: 748: 675:Participate in 635: 632: 630: 625: 621: 597: 590: 588: 585: 583: 578: 574: 550: 548: 542: 516:Fuhghettaboutit 466: 464: 458: 413: 411: 405: 386: 384: 378: 329: 327: 321: 301: 298: 296: 291: 287: 261: 259: 253: 220: 218: 212: 186: 183: 181: 176: 172: 150: 148: 142: 128:Fuhghettaboutit 124: 121: 119: 114: 110: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6082: 6080: 6072: 6071: 6042: 5973: 5970: 5967: 5966: 5965: 5964: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5885: 5786: 5783: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5737: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5681: 5680: 5679: 5678: 5671: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5657: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5610: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5596: 5595: 5511: 5508: 5505: 5452: 5449: 5448: 5447: 5446: 5445: 5390: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5106: 5105: 5104: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5004: 5003: 5002: 5001: 4957: 4956: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4799: 4798: 4797: 4796: 4795: 4794: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4680: 4679: 4590:at the end of 4516: 4513: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4446: 4443: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4374: 4341: 4338: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4265:David Göthberg 4261: 4258: 4249: 4245: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4163:WT:Attribution 4161:Yes, or maybe 4059:David Göthberg 4055: 4047: 4044: 4040: 4034: 4033: 3995: 3992:somewhere else 3971:David Göthberg 3930: 3927: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3873: 3872: 3869: 3868: 3860: 3843: 3842: 3834: 3829: 3827: 3825: 3824:automatically 3823: 3820: 3818: 3806: 3805: 3799: 3794: 3781: 3778: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3740:User:Zscout370 3723: 3720: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3666: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3553: 3550: 3537: 3534: 3533:Post-RfA notes 3531: 3530: 3529: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3352: 3349: 3342: 3338: 3337: 3333: 3332: 3329: 3328: 3323: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3309: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3295: 3288: 3285: 3284: 3278: 3277: 3271: 3270: 3264: 3263: 3257: 3256: 3244: 3238: 3234: 3233: 3230: 3229: 3216:Previous issue 3204: 3203: 3192: 3176: 3175: 3172: 3167: 3154: 3151: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3074: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 2999: 2996: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2920: 2873: 2870: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2837: 2792: 2765: 2708: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2678: 2640: 2637: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2610: 2578: 2575: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2548: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2458: 2440: 2439: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2404: 2373: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2327: 2261: 2258: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2231: 2225: 2203: 2155: 2152: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2121: 2118:Keen-o. :-) — 2076: 2031: 2028: 2027:Darts proposal 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 1997: 1972: 1937: 1931: 1930: 1908: 1905:Thanks. :-) — 1869: 1866: 1864: 1863: 1841: 1774: 1771: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1742: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1648: 1597: 1595: 1568: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1519: 1496: 1495: 1473: 1341: 1338: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1308: 1295: 1292: 1246: 1245: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1189: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1112: 1109:Good catch! — 1072: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1051: 1047: 1017: 1000: 996: 957: 954: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 925: 904: 903: 894: 893: 851: 830: 827: 824: 803: 780: 777: 774: 773: 772: 750: 731: 730: 725: 720: 718:Administrators 697: 696: 688: 687: 680: 679: 672: 671: 665: 664: 653: 652: 623: 620: 617: 576: 573: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 544: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 460: 407: 402: 380: 347: 346: 345: 323: 289: 286: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 255: 214: 174: 171: 168: 167: 166: 144: 112: 109: 106: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6081: 6070: 6064: 6058: 6054: 6053: 6047: 6043: 6041: 6035: 6029: 6025: 6024: 6017: 6013: 6009: 6008: 6007: 6006: 6003: 5998: 5994: 5990: 5968: 5960: 5954: 5948: 5944: 5943: 5937: 5933: 5932: 5931: 5927: 5923: 5919: 5915: 5914: 5913: 5907: 5901: 5897: 5896: 5890: 5886: 5884: 5878: 5872: 5868: 5867: 5861: 5860: 5859: 5858: 5854: 5850: 5843: 5833: 5823: 5815: 5811: 5810:a new message 5804: 5781: 5777: 5771: 5765: 5761: 5760: 5754: 5753: 5752: 5751: 5747: 5743: 5735: 5727: 5721: 5715: 5711: 5710: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5697: 5693: 5689: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5675: 5674: 5673: 5672: 5666: 5661: 5660: 5659: 5658: 5652: 5648: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5635: 5631: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5618: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5611: 5605: 5604: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5594: 5588: 5582: 5578: 5577: 5570: 5566: 5561: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5554: 5550: 5546: 5541: 5539: 5535: 5530: 5528: 5506: 5504: 5503: 5499: 5496: 5493: 5489: 5482: 5481:a new message 5475: 5467: 5466:a new message 5460: 5450: 5444: 5440: 5436: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5424: 5418: 5414: 5413: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5388: 5384: 5381: 5380: 5375: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5359: 5353: 5349: 5348: 5342: 5327: 5321: 5315: 5311: 5310: 5303: 5296: 5286: 5276: 5269: 5262: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5241: 5240: 5235: 5223: 5219: 5199: 5189: 5182: 5175: 5161: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5140: 5134: 5128: 5124: 5123: 5114: 5107: 5100: 5099: 5094: 5084: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5073: 5072: 5065: 5059: 5053: 5049: 5048: 5042: 5037: 5033: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5019: 5018: 5013: 4996: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4977: 4973: 4967: 4961: 4960: 4959: 4958: 4955: 4949: 4943: 4939: 4938: 4932: 4928: 4921: 4913: 4909: 4902: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4889: 4888: 4883: 4873: 4863: 4853: 4843: 4835: 4823: 4820: 4819: 4814: 4807: 4806: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4793: 4787: 4781: 4777: 4776: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4755: 4752: 4751: 4746: 4739: 4735: 4734:template page 4731: 4730: 4718: 4711: 4701: 4691: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4678: 4672: 4666: 4662: 4661: 4651: 4641: 4634: 4627: 4620: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4610: 4609: 4604: 4597: 4593: 4586: 4579: 4578:more than one 4575: 4568: 4558: 4551: 4544: 4537: 4529: 4512: 4509: 4505: 4499: 4493: 4489: 4488: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4476: 4475: 4470: 4463: 4441: 4435: 4431: 4427: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4414: 4408: 4404: 4403: 4394: 4384: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4364: 4360: 4336: 4330: 4324: 4318: 4314: 4313: 4303: 4280: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4259: 4256: 4250: 4246: 4243: 4240: 4239: 4224: 4218: 4212: 4208: 4207: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4172: 4170: 4169: 4164: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4152: 4146: 4142: 4141: 4135: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4125: 4123: 4122: 4117: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4105: 4099: 4095: 4094: 4084: 4079: 4075: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4053: 4052:I am a monkey 4048: 4045: 4041: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4032: 4026: 4020: 4016: 4015: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3999:accessibility 3996: 3993: 3988: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3967: 3963: 3958:. You added " 3954: 3947: 3925: 3919: 3916: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3904: 3898: 3894: 3893: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3880: 3865: 3859: 3856: 3854: 3849: 3844: 3841: 3839: 3831: 3822:Click here to 3816: 3811: 3808: 3807: 3802: 3798: 3797: 3776: 3772: 3766: 3760: 3756: 3755: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3741: 3719: 3716: 3712: 3706: 3700: 3696: 3695: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3664: 3658: 3652: 3646: 3642: 3641: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3623: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3590: 3584: 3580: 3579: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3551: 3532: 3528: 3522: 3516: 3512: 3511: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3498: 3494: 3472: 3464: 3461: 3460: 3455: 3448: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3436: 3430: 3426: 3425: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3414: 3413: 3408: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3383: 3377: 3373: 3372: 3347: 3343: 3331: 3327: 3324: 3322: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3313: 3310: 3308: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3296: 3294: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3283: 3279: 3276: 3273: 3272: 3269: 3265: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3255: 3252: 3251: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3241: 3228: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3206: 3205: 3202: 3201: 3199: 3193: 3190: 3185: 3181: 3178: 3177: 3171: 3170: 3150: 3147: 3143: 3137: 3131: 3127: 3126: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3113: 3107: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3069: 3063: 3057: 3051: 3047: 3046: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3030: 3025: 3023: 3017: 2984: 2978: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2960: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2950: 2947: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2935: 2929: 2925: 2923: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2868: 2858: 2852: 2846: 2842: 2840: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2828: 2827: 2821: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2807: 2801: 2797: 2795: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2780: 2774: 2770: 2768: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2738: 2737: 2731: 2725: 2703: 2699: 2693: 2687: 2683: 2681: 2674: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2636:Kevin Trudeau 2635: 2631: 2625: 2619: 2615: 2613: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2573: 2569: 2563: 2557: 2553: 2551: 2543: 2539: 2534: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2523: 2521: 2514: 2513: 2489: 2487: 2479: 2473: 2467: 2463: 2461: 2451: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2430: 2429: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2416: 2414: 2410: 2407: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2368: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2342: 2336: 2332: 2330: 2323: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2281: 2256: 2252: 2246: 2240: 2236: 2234: 2226: 2224: 2218: 2212: 2208: 2206: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2183: 2175: 2168: 2150: 2142: 2136: 2130: 2126: 2124: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2106: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2091: 2085: 2081: 2079: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2060: 2053: 2049: 2026: 2016: 2011: 2008: 2004: 2003: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1987: 1981: 1977: 1975: 1965: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1951: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1929: 1923: 1917: 1913: 1911: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1885: 1874: 1868: 1862: 1856: 1850: 1846: 1844: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1819: 1809: 1799: 1798:a new message 1792: 1770: 1767: 1763: 1757: 1751: 1747: 1745: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1718: 1717:a new message 1711: 1688: 1680: 1677: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1663: 1657: 1653: 1651: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1626: 1616: 1615:BLP editintro 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1593: 1586: 1585:documentation 1575: 1548: 1540: 1534: 1528: 1524: 1522: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1488: 1482: 1478: 1476: 1466: 1456: 1449: 1448: 1443: 1442: 1434: 1424: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1395: 1388: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1337: 1329: 1323: 1317: 1313: 1311: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1254: 1250: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1216: 1210: 1204: 1198: 1194: 1192: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1137: 1133: 1127: 1121: 1117: 1115: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1067: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1032: 1026: 1022: 1020: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1007: 1005: 1004: 1003: 989: 985: 981: 973: 952: 946: 940: 934: 930: 928: 921: 920: 919: 915: 911: 906: 905: 901: 896: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 874: 873: 872: 866: 860: 856: 854: 847: 825: 823: 822: 817: 814: 810: 809: 801: 800:proposal page 797: 775: 771: 765: 759: 755: 753: 746: 745: 744: 743: 740: 739: 734: 729: 726: 724: 721: 719: 716: 715: 714: 711: 709: 705: 700: 694: 690: 689: 686: 682: 681: 678: 674: 673: 670: 667: 666: 662: 658: 655: 654: 650: 646: 645: 644: 641: 638: 618: 616: 615: 611: 607: 601: 600:a new message 594: 571: 565: 559: 553: 549: 547: 539: 535: 531: 527: 526: 525: 521: 517: 513: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 481: 475: 469: 465: 463: 455: 450: 445: 444: 443: 439: 435: 430: 429: 428: 422: 416: 412: 410: 403: 401: 395: 389: 385: 383: 376: 371: 366: 365: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 338: 332: 328: 326: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 310: 306: 284: 276: 270: 264: 260: 258: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 237: 236: 235: 229: 223: 219: 217: 210: 209: 208: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 169: 165: 159: 153: 149: 147: 140: 139: 138: 137: 133: 129: 107: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6050: 6021: 5986: 5940: 5935: 5893: 5864: 5816: 5799: 5796:Just an FYI. 5757: 5739: 5707: 5601: 5574: 5568: 5564: 5542: 5531: 5524: 5494: 5488:SpikeToronto 5454: 5410: 5392: 5370: 5345: 5338: 5307: 5301: 5267: 5230: 5215: 5195: 5180: 5120: 5045: 5040: 5035: 5031: 5008: 5005: 4965: 4935: 4907: 4878: 4833: 4832: 4809: 4773: 4741: 4737: 4728: 4727: 4725: 4716: 4658: 4632: 4618: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4577: 4573: 4549: 4536:the template 4533: 4485: 4465: 4459: 4456:Just a chat. 4400: 4375:big red text 4354: 4351:Just a chat. 4310: 4307:fixed. : --> 4278: 4253: 4204: 4200:WT:COPYRIGHT 4195: 4167: 4138: 4134:WT:COPYRIGHT 4120: 4091: 4082: 4077: 4051: 4012: 4006: 3991: 3986: 3968: 3964: 3943: 3890: 3877: 3857: 3850: 3846: 3840: 3800: 3752: 3736: 3692: 3668: 3638: 3607: 3606: 3602: 3576: 3555: 3508: 3490: 3450: 3422: 3403: 3369: 3365: 3330: 3239: 3237: 3208: 3195: 3194: 3164:Projectspam. 3123: 3091: 3090: 3087: 3043: 3021: 3015: 3012: 3009:Just a chat. 2964: 2958: 2946:BuickCentury 2919: 2886: 2883:Just a chat. 2836: 2822: 2791: 2764: 2760:WP:MASTODONS 2747: 2732: 2721: 2677: 2657:72.85.193.72 2653: 2650:Just a chat. 2609: 2591: 2588:Just an FYI. 2547: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2486: 2457: 2426: 2403: 2393: 2386: 2383:Just an FYI. 2326: 2285:template to 2274: 2271:Wrong venue. 2230: 2202: 2182:"Athanasian" 2179: 2120: 2075: 2044: 2041:In progress. 2000: 1971: 1940: 1907: 1895: 1889: 1865: 1840: 1808:talkbacktiny 1787: 1741: 1706: 1703:Just an FYI. 1689:Talkback (2) 1647: 1591: 1566: 1518: 1472: 1445: 1439: 1403: 1398: 1397: 1354: 1351:Just a chat. 1307: 1302: 1298: 1287: 1269: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1234: 1231:Just a chat. 1188: 1155: 1111: 1088: 1085: 1082:Just a note. 1046: 1045: 1044: 1016: 995: 994: 993: 977: 967:Just an FYI. 924: 890:mailing list 850: 843: 840:Just an FYI. 806: 793: 749: 737: 735: 732: 712: 701: 698: 642: 639: 636: 589: 543: 459: 406: 379: 322: 302: 254: 213: 187: 184:Just a note. 143: 125: 122:Just a note. 103:January 2010 75: 43: 37: 6052:SMcCandlish 6023:SMcCandlish 5942:SMcCandlish 5895:SMcCandlish 5866:SMcCandlish 5759:SMcCandlish 5709:SMcCandlish 5576:SMcCandlish 5412:SMcCandlish 5347:SMcCandlish 5309:SMcCandlish 5122:SMcCandlish 5047:SMcCandlish 4937:SMcCandlish 4775:SMcCandlish 4660:SMcCandlish 4487:SMcCandlish 4460:Thanks for 4402:SMcCandlish 4312:SMcCandlish 4206:SMcCandlish 4140:SMcCandlish 4093:SMcCandlish 4074:Mike Godwin 4014:SMcCandlish 3926:Image links 3892:SMcCandlish 3754:SMcCandlish 3694:SMcCandlish 3640:SMcCandlish 3578:SMcCandlish 3547:Just chats. 3510:SMcCandlish 3424:SMcCandlish 3371:SMcCandlish 3125:SMcCandlish 3045:SMcCandlish 2966:SMcCandlish 2922:SMcCandlish 2839:SMcCandlish 2794:SMcCandlish 2767:SMcCandlish 2680:SMcCandlish 2612:SMcCandlish 2550:SMcCandlish 2460:SMcCandlish 2406:SMcCandlish 2329:SMcCandlish 2233:SMcCandlish 2205:SMcCandlish 2123:SMcCandlish 2078:SMcCandlish 1974:SMcCandlish 1910:SMcCandlish 1843:SMcCandlish 1818:whisperback 1744:SMcCandlish 1650:SMcCandlish 1569:I've moved 1521:SMcCandlish 1475:SMcCandlish 1447:Thunderball 1310:SMcCandlish 1191:SMcCandlish 1114:SMcCandlish 1091:Baffle_Ball 1089:In Article 1019:SMcCandlish 927:SMcCandlish 853:SMcCandlish 752:SMcCandlish 683:Respond to 633:RfA posted. 619:Admin stuff 546:SMcCandlish 462:SMcCandlish 409:SMcCandlish 382:SMcCandlish 325:SMcCandlish 299:RfA posted. 257:SMcCandlish 216:SMcCandlish 146:SMcCandlish 36:This is an 5989:WP:DELSORT 5630:mentorship 5507:Mentorship 5222:WP:SELFREF 4988:WP:SELFREF 4980:WP:SELFREF 4931:WP:SELFREF 4562:. Whereas 4383:uw-vandal1 4289:, or even 3946:you edited 3803:invitation 3495:(formerly 3395:WP:CHU/SUL 3346:WP:CHU/SUL 3282:background 3220:Next issue 3200:Newsletter 3028:You rang? 3022:HJMitchell 2002:Garrett W. 1942:Garrett W. 1739:Thanks. — 1726:SchuminWeb 1643:editnotice 1590:there. We 1416:fnord-ball 1412:fnord ball 1050:rbitrarily 999:rbitrarily 808:Garrett W. 649:WP:DPR#NAC 252:Huzzah! — 95:Archive 45 87:Archive 40 82:Archive 39 76:Archive 38 70:Archive 37 65:Archive 36 60:Archive 35 5922:Debresser 5849:Debresser 5808:You have 5603:Thank you 5479:You have 5464:You have 5451:Talkbacks 5435:Debresser 5395:Debresser 5268:shouldn't 4426:KenWalker 4359:KenWalker 4003:usability 3948:template 3830:watchlist 2748:criticism 2607:Noted. — 2542:WP:CANVAS 2450:db-author 2353:Debresser 2307:Debresser 2104:Cs-wolves 2058:Cs-wolves 1892:Clockwork 1796:You have 1715:You have 1441:Fnordball 1408:fnordball 802:. Thanks. 669:Mediation 598:You have 240:Gogo Dodo 198:Gogo Dodo 6063:Contribs 6034:Contribs 5953:Contribs 5906:Contribs 5877:Contribs 5792:Resolved 5770:Contribs 5720:Contribs 5634:Mattisse 5617:tar baby 5587:Contribs 5560:tar baby 5521:Decline. 5517:Resolved 5498:contribs 5423:Contribs 5358:Contribs 5320:Contribs 5133:Contribs 5058:Contribs 4948:Contribs 4786:Contribs 4671:Contribs 4522:Resolved 4498:Contribs 4452:Resolved 4413:Contribs 4393:welcome2 4347:Resolved 4323:Contribs 4217:Contribs 4151:Contribs 4104:Contribs 4025:Contribs 3936:Resolved 3903:Contribs 3866:<< 3787:Resolved 3765:Contribs 3729:Resolved 3705:Contribs 3665:Your RfA 3651:Contribs 3627:contribs 3589:Contribs 3559:Ret.Prof 3543:Resolved 3521:Contribs 3506:Done! — 3483:Resolved 3435:Contribs 3382:Contribs 3358:Resolved 3321:Want ads 3160:Resolved 3136:Contribs 3111:contribs 3080:Resolved 3056:Contribs 3005:Resolved 2977:Contribs 2934:Contribs 2905:Polargeo 2890:Polargeo 2879:Resolved 2851:Contribs 2806:Contribs 2779:Contribs 2756:WP:LIBEL 2714:Resolved 2692:Contribs 2646:Resolved 2624:Contribs 2584:Resolved 2562:Contribs 2500:Resolved 2472:Contribs 2379:Resolved 2341:Contribs 2267:Resolved 2245:Contribs 2217:Contribs 2187:AnonMoos 2161:Resolved 2135:Contribs 2090:Contribs 2037:Resolved 1986:Contribs 1964:Message2 1922:Contribs 1855:Contribs 1780:Resolved 1756:Contribs 1699:Resolved 1675:Amalthea 1662:Contribs 1633:Amalthea 1601:Amalthea 1598:Cheers, 1559:Resolved 1533:Contribs 1487:Contribs 1347:Resolved 1322:Contribs 1235:In this 1227:Resolved 1203:Contribs 1148:Resolved 1138:Your RfA 1126:Contribs 1078:Resolved 1031:Contribs 963:Resolved 939:Contribs 865:Contribs 836:Resolved 786:Resolved 764:Contribs 629:Resolved 606:Armbrust 582:Resolved 572:Talkback 558:Contribs 486:WP:ADMIN 474:Contribs 421:Contribs 394:Contribs 337:Contribs 295:Resolved 269:Contribs 228:Contribs 180:Resolved 158:Contribs 118:Resolved 6046:WP:DS/C 5993:WP:DS/C 5806:Hello. 5677:better? 5569:process 5477:Hello. 5462:Hello. 5378:Toronto 5295:clarify 5238:Toronto 5016:Toronto 4886:Toronto 4817:Toronto 4749:Toronto 4619:already 4607:Toronto 4473:Toronto 4248:sorry". 4007:intends 3953:caution 3828:to your 3676:Dweller 3610:Phantom 3298:Contest 3240:Content 3094:Phantom 2959:have to 2673:WP:LEAD 2594:Dweller 1794:Hello. 1713:Hello. 1273:Si Trew 1258:Si Trew 1174:Dweller 1159:Dweller 980:granted 900:WP:PERM 596:Hello. 494:Dweller 490:WP:PREP 434:Dweller 355:Dweller 305:Dweller 39:archive 5918:WP:TFD 5889:WP:TFD 5742:Tenmei 5692:Tenmei 5565:listen 5545:Tenmei 5032:reader 4912:WP:TFD 4738:before 4302:Notice 4295:|link= 4188:WP:NOR 4180:WP:ATT 3552:Caring 3362:Noted. 3268:60,000 2949:Driver 2752:WP:NPA 2533:WP:ANI 2301:, and 2109:(talk) 2063:(talk) 1299:per se 708:WP:ANI 659:, and 375:WT:NCP 370:WT:MOS 6059:ʕ(ل)ˀ 6057:Talk⇒ 6030:ʕ(ل)ˀ 6028:Talk⇒ 5979:Stale 5949:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5947:Talk⇒ 5936:to me 5902:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5900:Talk⇒ 5873:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5871:Talk⇒ 5832:Merge 5766:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5764:Talk⇒ 5716:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5714:Talk⇒ 5688:diffs 5583:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5581:Talk⇒ 5455:Two: 5419:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5417:Talk⇒ 5373:Spike 5354:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5352:Talk⇒ 5316:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5314:Talk⇒ 5302:after 5233:Spike 5181:again 5174:cfact 5129:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5127:Talk⇒ 5093:cfact 5054:ʕ(ل)ˀ 5052:Talk⇒ 5011:Spike 4944:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4942:Talk⇒ 4881:Spike 4812:Spike 4782:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4780:Talk⇒ 4744:Spike 4720:page? 4667:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4665:Talk⇒ 4650:cfact 4633:facts 4602:Spike 4552:than 4494:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4492:Talk⇒ 4468:Spike 4409:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4407:Talk⇒ 4337:Subst 4319:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4317:Talk⇒ 4213:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4211:Talk⇒ 4196:files 4192:WP:RS 4147:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4145:Talk⇒ 4100:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4098:Talk⇒ 4087:link= 4021:ʕ(ل)ˀ 4019:Talk⇒ 3960:link= 3899:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3897:Talk⇒ 3862:: --> 3861:: --> 3761:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3759:Talk⇒ 3701:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3699:Talk⇒ 3672:WP:ER 3647:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3645:Talk⇒ 3613:Steve 3585:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3583:Talk⇒ 3517:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3515:Talk⇒ 3493:Tbsdy 3431:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3429:Talk⇒ 3378:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3376:Talk⇒ 3344:From 3132:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3130:Talk⇒ 3097:Steve 3084:Done. 3052:ʕ(ل)ˀ 3050:Talk⇒ 2973:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2971:Talk⇒ 2930:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2928:Talk⇒ 2847:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2845:Talk⇒ 2825:Cobra 2819:Glass 2802:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2800:Talk⇒ 2775:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2773:Talk⇒ 2735:Cobra 2729:Glass 2688:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2686:Talk⇒ 2620:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2618:Talk⇒ 2558:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2556:Talk⇒ 2468:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2466:Talk⇒ 2387:re: 2337:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2335:Talk⇒ 2241:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2239:Talk⇒ 2213:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2211:Talk⇒ 2131:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2129:Talk⇒ 2086:ʕ(ل)ˀ 2084:Talk⇒ 1982:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1980:Talk⇒ 1918:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1916:Talk⇒ 1851:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1849:Talk⇒ 1752:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1750:Talk⇒ 1658:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1656:Talk⇒ 1529:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1527:Talk⇒ 1483:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1481:Talk⇒ 1396:is a 1318:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1316:Talk⇒ 1199:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1197:Talk⇒ 1152:Done. 1122:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1120:Talk⇒ 1096:Netpi 1027:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1025:Talk⇒ 935:ʕ(ل)ˀ 933:Talk⇒ 882:guide 861:ʕ(ل)ˀ 859:Talk⇒ 760:ʕ(ل)ˀ 758:Talk⇒ 704:WP:AN 693:WP:RQ 677:RfC's 554:ʕ(ل)ˀ 552:Talk⇒ 470:ʕ(ل)ˀ 468:Talk⇒ 417:ʕ(ل)ˀ 415:Talk⇒ 390:ʕ(ل)ˀ 388:Talk⇒ 333:ʕ(ل)ˀ 331:Talk⇒ 265:ʕ(ل)ˀ 263:Talk⇒ 224:ʕ(ل)ˀ 222:Talk⇒ 154:ʕ(ل)ˀ 152:Talk⇒ 16:< 6001:ping 5997:Pcap 5926:talk 5853:talk 5746:talk 5736:Ping 5696:talk 5665:here 5651:here 5647:here 5549:talk 5492:talk 5439:talk 5399:talk 5220:and 5041:want 5036:this 4995:Fact 4972:WP:V 4920:fact 4908:this 4834:P.S. 4695:and 4690:Fact 4640:fact 4626:Fact 4592:each 4462:this 4430:Talk 4363:Talk 4279:page 4269:talk 4190:and 4184:WP:V 4168:xeno 4136:? — 4121:xeno 4063:talk 4001:and 3975:talk 3915:Ikip 3879:Ikip 3680:talk 3621:talk 3603:will 3563:talk 3196:The 3105:talk 2909:talk 2894:talk 2762:. — 2754:and 2724:here 2661:talk 2598:talk 2574:Bong 2519:Talk 2357:talk 2324:. — 2311:talk 2191:talk 1896:Soul 1829:talk 1730:Talk 1620:and 1508:talk 1470:. — 1428:and 1414:and 1373:talk 1303:that 1277:talk 1262:talk 1244:not? 1178:talk 1163:talk 1100:talk 914:talk 878:here 848:. — 706:and 610:talk 520:talk 498:talk 438:talk 359:talk 309:talk 285:Gosh 244:talk 202:talk 192:and 170:CSDs 132:talk 108:Ping 6012:own 5822:Tfm 5500:), 5285:fix 5275:sic 5113:sic 4978:or 4901:fix 4767:to 4596:and 4574:one 4078:why 3499:) 3473:RFA 3458:Why 3411:Why 3016:can 2869:RfA 2433:nkB 2428:Fra 2409:... 1882:at 1823:?-- 1592:can 1567:Hi, 1399:mis 1291:;-) 1288:MEU 5981:– 5928:) 5855:) 5847:. 5845:}} 5839:{{ 5835:}} 5829:{{ 5825:}} 5819:{{ 5794:– 5748:) 5698:) 5551:) 5519:– 5486:– 5441:) 5401:) 5298:}} 5292:{{ 5288:}} 5282:{{ 5278:}} 5272:{{ 5264:}} 5261:cn 5258:{{ 5191:}} 5188:cn 5185:{{ 5177:}} 5171:{{ 5163:}} 5160:cn 5157:{{ 5116:}} 5110:{{ 5096:}} 5090:{{ 5086:}} 5080:{{ 4998:}} 4992:{{ 4968:}} 4923:}} 4917:{{ 4904:}} 4898:{{ 4875:}} 4869:{{ 4865:}} 4859:{{ 4855:}} 4849:{{ 4845:}} 4839:{{ 4717:no 4713:}} 4707:{{ 4703:}} 4697:{{ 4693:}} 4687:{{ 4653:}} 4647:{{ 4643:}} 4637:{{ 4629:}} 4623:{{ 4588:}} 4582:{{ 4570:}} 4564:{{ 4560:}} 4554:{{ 4546:}} 4540:{{ 4524:– 4454:– 4428:| 4396:}} 4390:{{ 4386:}} 4380:{{ 4361:| 4356:-- 4349:– 4305:}} 4299:{{ 4271:) 4263:-- 4186:, 4065:) 4057:-- 3977:) 3969:-- 3956:}} 3950:{{ 3938:– 3855:. 3789:– 3731:– 3682:) 3630:\ 3565:) 3545:– 3485:– 3453:So 3406:So 3360:– 3218:| 3162:– 3114:\ 3082:– 3007:– 2911:) 2896:) 2881:– 2716:– 2663:) 2648:– 2600:) 2586:– 2512:NW 2502:– 2453:}} 2447:{{ 2411:" 2381:– 2359:) 2313:) 2297:, 2293:, 2289:, 2283:}} 2277:{{ 2269:– 2193:) 2163:– 2050:, 2039:– 1967:}} 1961:{{ 1831:) 1821:}} 1815:{{ 1811:}} 1805:{{ 1782:– 1732:) 1701:– 1630:. 1628:}} 1622:{{ 1618:}} 1612:{{ 1588:}} 1582:{{ 1577:}} 1571:{{ 1561:– 1510:) 1504:TB 1468:}} 1462:{{ 1458:}} 1452:{{ 1436:}} 1430:{{ 1426:}} 1420:{{ 1390:}} 1384:{{ 1375:) 1369:TB 1349:– 1279:) 1264:) 1229:– 1180:) 1165:) 1157:-- 1150:– 1102:) 1094:-- 1080:– 965:– 916:) 908:-- 838:– 788:– 631:– 612:) 584:– 522:) 500:) 440:) 361:) 311:) 297:– 246:) 204:) 182:– 134:) 120:– 91:→ 6065:. 6036:. 5955:. 5924:( 5908:. 5879:. 5851:( 5772:. 5744:( 5722:. 5694:( 5653:. 5589:. 5547:( 5495:· 5490:( 5437:( 5425:. 5397:( 5360:. 5322:. 5135:. 5060:. 4950:. 4788:. 4673:. 4530:. 4500:. 4415:. 4325:. 4267:( 4257:" 4252:" 4219:. 4153:. 4106:. 4061:( 4027:. 3973:( 3905:. 3767:. 3707:. 3678:( 3653:. 3624:| 3618:/ 3591:. 3561:( 3523:. 3437:. 3384:. 3138:. 3108:| 3102:/ 3058:. 2979:. 2936:. 2907:( 2892:( 2853:. 2808:. 2781:. 2694:. 2659:( 2626:. 2596:( 2564:. 2522:) 2516:( 2474:. 2355:( 2343:. 2309:( 2247:. 2219:. 2189:( 2169:. 2137:. 2092:. 2012:} 2010:✍ 2007:☎ 2005:{ 1998:- 1988:. 1952:} 1950:✍ 1947:☎ 1945:{ 1938:- 1924:. 1886:. 1857:. 1827:( 1758:. 1728:( 1664:. 1535:. 1506:( 1489:. 1371:( 1324:. 1275:( 1260:( 1205:. 1176:( 1161:( 1128:. 1098:( 1052:0 1048:A 1033:. 1001:0 997:A 941:. 912:( 902:. 892:. 867:. 818:} 816:✍ 813:☎ 811:{ 804:- 766:. 695:. 663:. 651:. 608:( 560:. 518:( 496:( 476:. 436:( 423:. 396:. 357:( 339:. 307:( 271:. 242:( 230:. 200:( 160:. 130:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index