User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 5

875:

their talk page, or avoiding specific start and end dates. I'm not sure whether all the poll wording discussion and prepolling was archived properly. Nevertheless, the proper time and place to bring up the issue of the order of questions is at the poll guideline page (I'm thinking of redirecting WP:Poll to WP:Straw polls; currently it redirects to RfC I think). Or before the poll was started. Yes, I know, the wording hadn't been finalized, but there were many versions of the wording proposed and in many cases some sort of do-you-support-ATT was first. Was this issue of changing the order of the questions raised before the poll was started? There was about a week for discussion of poll wording; it could have been raised anytime in there. I think it's a good idea and I may get involved in support (for future polls) at the poll guidelines page. Jimbo wanted hundreds of responses and is getting them. Anyway, the original policies have a strong advantage of inertia: if there's no consensus, the policies don't change. Putting "yes" to a new proposal first can be seen as somewhat balancing that. With respect and as an independent thinker (and person who is trying to get back to actually spending time writing the encyclopedia, besides doing RL occasionally :-) --

5004:

the sentiments re: proposing them first on the talk page though, and will try to remember that. I'm really nothing more than casually interested in Knowledge (XXG), as you may be able to tell from my user page, I'm just someone who plays pool in his spare time and looks at dead deep-sea animals buried in rocks the rest of the time, someone who looks at them so hard that people are going to call me a doctor because of it. An abstract existence. So I've never taken it upon myself to get bogged down with all the procedures, programming sides of it, etc. I'll certainly do my best to make it easier for you avid "Wikipedians" though, and appreciate your letting me know when I could've done so.

4964:. We're kind of getting to the point where this article needs to be sourced to hell-and-back or it'll become an AfD target, and we're also getting to the point where more than just two editors are interested in it. I'd like to suggest that henceforth new additions (and deletions, and major entry re-writes) be proposed in the relevant "proposals" talk sections. I'm committing to using them myself. While I think for the short term it's going to be three to five editors paying any attention at all, it's still a good start toward establishing some form of process to avoid later accusations along the lines of 3795:

Walters, and beat him for the cash. We all thought Jeeze, we'll be seeing her soon, and sure enough.... It's such a shame the men can't get it together. Don't get me wrong, I like watching the women, but (and I'm not being sexist, just stating a fact that has been flogged to death in Billiard magazines as to why) the men are so much better overall. I'm pretty sick of seeing three or four women, three balls better than any of their nearest competition, always in the finals. By the way, I just noticed your uncyclopedia edit. HA!.--

2397:

4 positive votes and nobody was vehemently objecting to it, had people had more patience it could have lead to some better solutions, so I'm also not all that pleased about the consensus process, but I don't see why you are opposed to this group now. Why don't you think WAS4.250 would be neutral, he voted first support, and then listening to what opposition people were saying suggested a compromise based on transclusion. I think that's a bad idea, but I like his willingness to listen. Also, I have seen him

31: 3682:

hardcoded linebreak at the top of it, which I removed, so I'm not going though all articles in that stubcat and fixing the spacing. Had nothing to do with your film nav template at all. From what I can tell, nav templates (if using standardized code) should all have a blank line before them (unless preceded by another nav tag) and one after (i.e. before categories) unless followed by another nav tag. I.e., you didn't break anything. :-) —

4453: 2323:;-) G'luck with the Tools o' Doom. I'm sure they'll be familiar in no time. I was lucky for a while - someone made a great script that simulated a number of admin tools (including rollback), by excuting multiple manual actions in series w/o human interaction, as if they were one thing. Got used to it pretty quick. Then it went away. I guess it was perhaps too close a simulation... Couldn't do anything 5369:

hundred articles (which is nothing; there are over 1.5 million articles in the English Knowledge (XXG) alone) does not affect anything about this issue. And read the talk page yourself, please. You will note that it has been objected to by others. I'm not sure why you personally feel so invested in this, but I can virtually guarantee you that both of those related page will show up at

1493:, we don't so much deal with petty one-off spam but rather complex, multi-article, sometimes involving as many as 50 different domains subtly spammed one link at a time over many months using lots of socks or IPs. Our work involves a lot of stuff like what you did on this sockpuppet case as well as off-wikipedia searching of related domains, comments made in linkspamming forums, etc. 4538:

mentioned on the BBC snooker coverage. I feel 'the machine' is as valid as any of the other names used, maybe if someone involved in writing the article knows Anthony this could be confirmed, along with the other nicknames. Also i did not intentionally change my IP address, I am on a wired network with multiple computers which i am informed is what causes it to change.

4759:

highly inconclusive evidence that is it old Willy On Wheels. I also have a personal interest in seeing justice done in this case; not my primary motivation, but it is enough of one that I'm not simply going to forget about it. I recognize this user's patterns pretty well and will be watching RfAs and such for new socks. And thanks for the smile! :-) —

4968:, a concern I've had for some time now (based on some really nasty AfD action I've observed starting around last Nov.) Disclaimer: I also have some nitpicks about your latest round of additions, and would rather have talked them out, and would rather now talk them out, than go in and do a bossy revert, which even a month ago I probably would have. : --> 5851: 5801: 5751: 5488: 5293: 5247: 5196: 5132: 5079: 5043: 4949: 4903: 4784: 4711: 4526: 4441: 4382: 4335: 3834: 3760: 3538: 3465: 3398: 3220: 3135: 3075: 2954: 2904: 2827: 2775: 2700: 2628: 2555: 2508: 2385: 2290: 2174: 2115: 2020: 1812: 1756: 1724: 1670: 1549: 1475: 1221: 1159: 992: 926: 752: 700: 472: 398: 284: 228: 118: 4734: 4838:

challenge that. Or replace it with something more verifiable and meaningful, such as "was inducted into the British Sports Hall of Fame in (year), and a month later was named Player of the Year by Magazine Name". Thirdly and even more along that more subtle line, cite verifiable sources as to event turnout or other factors that

249:

doing artistic shots, with Mike Massey tagging along as the face far more people know. Anyway, mark down the date. Semih's a bit of an asshole in person (he does great caricatures and makes fun of Blomdahl by imitating him right to his face) but he's incredible to watch. His stroke is really not of this planet.--

2643:. As far as I can see, it doesn't have to be a competing committee (at least for a long time), just a few people trying to work for real consensus on what the existing policy pages say, and whether they can usefully adopt ATT's language. As for the bullies: if you want to write up an RfC, I will endorse it. 5419:, with "Knowledge (XXG):" in the namespace, and it seems to describe itself as a policy, so the natural conlusion would be that it is official, that and the fact that it is being used on hundreds of articles makes it seem like a ligitimate policy. However, obviously I was mistaken, and know better now. 4822:; assertions of the form "widely considered", "many say", "a small but vocal minority", "critics have insisted" etc., that do not specify who they are talking about appear to the incautious reader to be meaningful, but really aren't since they generally can't be verified. In other cases it constitutes 1614:, but I freely admit to it here. He is a great user, RfA is largely broken, and my comment was meant to be a reflection of that. For any confusion, I genuinely apologize, and, in retrospect, I probably shouldn't have bugged you about moving the vote. You were only doing the logical thing. Sorry. -- 2401:, arguing against SlimVirgin with not exactly the kindest of words, finally Crum gave a third opinion, but as you can see WAS and SV were quite opposed to each other, but that WAS can argue strongly why still remain rational and civil I think makes him very useful on this committee, don't you think? -- 5003:

If you want to talk about the recent additions, fire away. I don't delve into reference books for the terms I suggest I'm afraid, they're usually just things I've picked up from extensive playing experience and from TV commentary I hear, and find it's usually difficult to reference them. I appreciate

4356:

The size isn't mandatory. The way this one is being done is a step forward, and needs to be taken further, so that the "|caption=" line can go away as well. ] already handles these parameters for us, and everyone knows how to use them already; infoboxes should not be reinventing the wheel on a level

3804:

Yeah, the Pan/Kim match. Didn't realized it was on last week or would've watched it then. As for the men, yeah, it'd be really awesome to have good coverage of the WPA Men's World Nine-ball Championship. Uncyc: Yeah, I just thought it would be funny to mix in pool stuff in the swimming pool place,

3731:

IIRC AWB used to put two blank lines before the first stub. However my point above (in my usual (overly) shorthand) was that it wold be better to change the (c.3,552) stub templates than the hiundred thousand plus articles which use them, and we could then remove one instruction the general editors

2847:

and all subcategories" has a decent chance of succeeding. Most people at UCFD, including myself, value consistency among user category names even if we disagree with the currently established naming convention, and are not likely to support renames of individual categories if the rename goes against

2437:

should hold. Many people who proposed ATT are very much opposed to having V and NOR remaining, I'm myself not sure what would be the best solution, but WAS's position is for example heavily disputed by Marskell, who abhors any speech of keeping all 4 policies, and transclusion I think is just as bad.

2411:

I'm not opposed to the group. I'm opposed to any more shenanigans by SlimVirgin, Jossi and Jayjg in manipulating the perception and direction of the process away from balance. I don't buy the bit about WAS. He was a supporter. Like all supporters, and hopefully any opposers who wish to be part of

2396:

I would like to say a few things about people trying to "control the debate". I know there are a few bossy editors here, but please hear me out, because I was also there, together with PMAnderson, I spent a few hours designing a poll with him that I think at least deserved more attention. It received

646:

threads). Like at WP polls, I would rather see the new comments in each section (if there are sections) at the top of the pile. All of the human-hours wasted scrolling around trying to find that thread posted 20 minutes ago, now with 7 more following it, somewhere near the bottom of this section of

327:

a Trivia section, I think trivia should be in it until someone thinks of a better way than putting trivial facts into their own pseudo-paragraphs consisting of a single pseudo-sentence. I am not interested in the article and don't know enough about Steen, I feel, to determine what in that section is

5368:

is not a guideline either, and has never been Proposed; it's simply random "my personal idea" nonsense that belongs in Userspace until such time as it has been proposed, debated, fixed, and then maybe becomes and actual guideline. The fact that its proponents have spammed it's bogus image to several

4985:

PS: A radically different way of putting this is also that about once every couple of months we get a noob come in and add/change/delete stuff like mad, and I think part of this is because there's little evidence of any process on the talk page, and a big pile of "do what thou willt" evidence to the

4758:

Well, my concern is that the real person behind this probably has 20 sock puppets used for various forms of PoV pushing, disruption, RfA screwing-around, bad faith nominations and arguments in XfD, and attempts to influence blocking & username policy, among other things. There's interesting but

4107:

The problem as I see it is that a small number of editors have in the past been able to dominate NI issues on WP and this has allowed the widespread use of the flag to happen, now that the issue is being challenged they are getting defensive of their position, and refuse to accept logic, it took six

2658:

Re: M's thing, I'll look into it in more detail, but I'm getting weary of policy debates at this point. Re and RfC, see last sentence. :-) If things continue to worsen, I'd consider it, though. I was already approached once by someone wanting to file an RfC on SlimVirgin, but I really didn't come

2301:

Sorry, I just undeleted the rollback of my unintential protection of your userpage;-) Seriously, now that I have these buttons, I'm scared to get my cursor to close to the top o' me screen. Baby steps shall be my mantra for a little while. Well I said it before, but, thanks for the nom, the support,

1443:

in favor of vandal leniency, and somehow always seem to come to each other's defense just when it is needed, is very, very suspicious. PS: This also isn't about my RfA, either. I could actually kind of care less, as I focus on article writing and cleanup, not admin-ish things like vandal hunting.

519:

Yes. We have only begun to discover what it is that could be discovered here. Let us think of voter-friendly designs. At the top of the StrawPoll page there should be three links that would to the appropriate subsection (Neutral, Support, Oppose) which would open in edit mode, and, as instructed,

498:

I'd be OK with it, but the neutral votes don't mean much for gauging consensus (the comments in them will mean a lot when it comes to figuring out what to do afterward.) I think it's the +/- order that is skewing the poll. When it was small, it started out pretty much 50/50, but is slowly shifting

5022:

On a related note. I am still committed to sourcing each and every entry. I've just been lazy recently and doing admin tasks and learning admin tasks so my focus has been a bit different as a noob all over again. You realize, btw, that this glossary, if ultimately sourced with inline citations from

4850:

it. Our readers are pretty smart and can take a hint. It's very tempting to have article label the most popular, best, and legendary players "a crowd favorite", "one of the world's finest", and "a living legend", but this is magazine language, not encyclopedia language. The problem is especially

4803:

Stanton, you have an "attribution needed" notice against the first para. of the White article, re his being 'considered' one of the most popular players ever" yet the Davis article has nothing against the claim that he is 'considered' one of the most successful players ever. Do you see any problems

4615:

Yes, sounds a good compromise I agree to it since you have been very reasonable. But isnt that possibly open to abuse if someone simply stated they had such a magazine and used it to source something incorrect? I realise its unlikely here but maybe with the more famous players or especially in more

4537:

When I first started watching snooker on the BBC back in the mid 1990's Hamilton was frequently referred to as 'the machine' by the MC and by the commentators. As far as I can see in the article none of the nicknames have been attributed to a reliable source and I for one have not heard all of them

4393:

Er... would you please calm down? I said "wtf" in a light-hearted manner. Meaning: "Wtf? Why is this here twice? Editors who didn't notice eachother, maybe?", I didn't mean it as an offense. Do you actually mean that information should be mentioned twice in the same paragraph? Because that wouldn't

4077:

Certainly. What I find most disturbing is that the parties in question are so mired in this debate (perhaps it is one of their favorite fighting-about topics) that they cannot recognize that we are not pushing the other side of the debate at all, simply noting that the debate exists and that WP has

3604:

Oh, "Mr. Clever" was you! No offense intended. Anyway, I have cleaned up every article used by that stub for spacing issues (there were a lot more of them than just with regard to that stub tag actually; someone working on those article has no idea that putting 5 blank lines in wiki text actually

1376:

Probably a different one - the tone isn't right. I think that one may just be a genuine noob, or someone else's puppet. The candidate though premature seems quite earnest, and I can't find any evidence of Natl1 being a jackass, so I doubt it's his/her puppet. The ones I'm after have pretty clear

1003:

Hi there. I have to say that "the rest is the rest!" There are only two variations on it: the extended rest and the one with three indentations for placing the cue, but I have *never heard the rest called the "cross rest". So in that respect the article is wrong and, IMHO, "cross rest" is overkill.

248:

will be playing. As you probably know, he performs the most spectacular artistic billiards exhibitions. Watched him year after year at Carom Cafe (Sang Lee's room ), and it is something to be seen. Since Mike Massey is getting lessons, I wouldn't be surprised if it's not 3-cushion per se, but Semih

142:

I'm not sure what you mean by French spacing; if you mean double-spacing after sentence-ending punctuation, I was actually taught to do that in American school, and the practice is recommended by many American style guides and such. Opposition to it seems to have arisen only in the last generation

3869:

at the top of the template page documentation. It wouldn't affect the template at all, but would be prominent to anyone looking at the template. It would not stop all abuse, since people use these templates without reading up on them of course, but if it specified that the template should not be

3681:

It was the stub tag itself. Stubs templates all (when using standard stub tag code) have a spacing problem in that they need to have 2 blank lines in the article between the stub tag and whatever preceded it. In the case of {{1930s-comedy-film-stubs}} someone thought they'd be "clever" and put a

3417:

Matrona". A bit of context: For many Celtic religion articles, a user had added 'etymology' sections with absurdly contorted language (along with over-linking, original research, and red-herring external links). As a result, many of these articles were dominated by long sections that actually said

1115:

I was thinking that the "average" person reading the article would not need to know anything more than the player pictured was using "a rest". Anything more than this I think is unnecessary. And "the rest" is always understood as what you call the "cross rest". If a player wants something else, he

629:

preferable, at the new topic level, but that for some reason unbeknownst to me, WP largely settled on bottom posting long before I arrived. I suspect it is the influence of threaded newsreaders and later webboards, which present each thread with the first post at the top by default instead of the

5389:

I don't feel personally invested in it. I saw what appeared to be a policy that says the image is suppose to be there, and a list of hundreds of articles that use it (including some pretty major articles) and assumed it to be an official policy, and therefore attempted to follow it by placing the

4564:

The fact that there are unsourced details in an article is no reason to add more of them (it's the "if O.J. can get away with murder why can't I" theme. :-) Even a year ago WP was sloppy about sourcing, but the strong trend today is to resist the addition of more unsourced material, and focus on

3286:

BTW, that website where you can't get the real URL to the page: Please tell me the name of the site and if you can find the page again, copy-paste some signficant and likely unique text from the page, so that I can use Google's site search to find the page. I can probably figure out how to get a

2464:

No, but one idea would be a better formulated ATT that would replace V and NOR. For example, giving more prominence to synthesis and stressing the need that attribution is verifiable, perhaps removing the sentence "not whether it is true", etc, BUT keeping it one single policy. Anyway, thanks for

5221:

I wasn't "ignoring" anything; I've never even seen that thread, and given that it is very short and represents few opinions, I don't see that it's indicative of any sort of a consensus. But I don't care what flag is used for such articles, really. I'm not pushing a POV, just doing formatting.

874:

Good idea in principle. I'm not planning to do even 1R of a revert war over this and I might not even comment on the poll talk page. I note that certain poll guidelines weren't followed, e.g. putting "Yes (pro-merge)" etc. rather than plain "Yes" as a section title so people could follow it on

4404:

D'oh! I totally didn't even notice that it was in there twice. The edits by someone else, I think Grutness, after your concisifying of the sentence moved it, and it looked like it'd been deleted when I skimmed the changes too fast, so I "restored" it. Gaaahhh... Sorry I bit your ankle here. —

2416:

process, he will be seeking compromise, so saying that he's moved form support to neutral because he proposed a compromise means that everyone nominated has to be classified as neutral. The classifications were drawn from the poll, not from present willingness to seek consensus. PS: Bossiness

1434:

This isn't about whether you have extreme opinions about blocking, it's about suspect behavior patterns that point to sockpuppettry. You can be as wikianarchist as you like - this isn't about your opinions. That you and Honda Pilot a.k.a. Uninsured Driver showed up out of no where but already

3794:

You're talking about the Xiao-Ting Pan, Ga-Young Kim match and the semifinals? I have "billiards" on my DVR queue. Watched that one last week.:-) I was in Master billiards in Queens about two years ago and in walked Ga Young Kim. No one knew who she was and she played a very good player, Tommy

1395:

I don't know what to say, I can credit you with opening the discussion but an not sure if you're trying to stop me from editing or from voting. At least the webmaster said not to post about it so now I fear anyone who reposts will point to me. Have some admin look as both deleted revisions.

801:

This has already been aired on said talk page. I think the intent has been misunderstood. I'm saying I won't revert-war over it, but I'm asking just three other editors whom I know have aired similar misgivings to watch the situation and get involved in the debate if they think the issues I'm

2358:

sandbagging on me. Must be attempting to butter me up for money games next week or something. D'oh. I guess I should be proud I sussed him out, but I was feeling pretty good about the winning streak. Anyway congrats on your "everyone supports, except 4 irrational cranks" winning streak. :

2189:

in tracking down the Honda Pilot/Jeff Defender sockpuppets. Honda Pilot was obviously suspicious, but as an RfA candidate, I was powerless to make any accusations lest I be accused of harassing the opposers. Despite your personal reservations about me, you stepped forward to expose them and

4837:

Two common solutions for this problem are: Directly quote an external and plausibly reliable source, such as a snooker magazine, saying that the player is "widely considered" thus-and-such, or quote its reader poll results stating that player-and-so is in fact the most popular. It's hard to

3587:

gets around to it, we can use a bot to fix the spacing problem in the templates themselves and use another bot to remove the double-spacing in the articles, so the more consistently they are presently and henceforth used the better, since any exceptions will need to be dealt with manually. —

896:

Radiant, I agree it can look that way; it was a poor choice of wording. Seraphimblade said the same thing basically. Wasn't the intent, as I think my actions demonstrate (I did one revert, with a very descriptive edit summary justifying it, then took it to talk when it was re-reverted.) —

1083:

PPS: Sorry if that sounded brusque; I was multitasking a bit too much, I think. I un-brusque it: I'm sure you are right that experienced players probably say things like "gimme the rest" and it is understood that they mean the cross; if they wanted the spider or the swan/goose-neck (or the

3577:

That one was weird. Someone had put a forced line-break at the top of the stub template itself; I've fixed that and fixed the article to be consistent with usage in most other cases. There are now two blank lines (in the article, not the stub tag; this spacing need is documented at

295:

Hey there. I noticed you recently made some edits to this article. I wanted to point out that rather than creating a trivia section, it would have been preferable if you had incorporated any notable information into the body of the article (and deleted the rest). The guideline,

541:

doubt that anyone can change the years-worth of bottom-posting that is ingrained into WP. And everyone knows how to use the edit buttons. I'm talking about something more substantive, the bias in the survey, not ease of adding to the survey (in a bias-led fashion, no less). —

2474:

Sure, I'm not saying it won't work itself out; I have absolute faith that it will. What concerns me is the "triumvirate" trying so hard to steer it in one particular direction. It's not entirely about how many documents there will be in the end. I'm sure you see this. —

487:

for 24 hours to see what effect that has on the distribution of votes. Surely, who could object to the order being Neutral, Support, Oppose for 24 hours. We could propose that the switch occur at the beginning of the measurement period in the table. What do you think?

4870:

would be get there too. Paul Hunter has potential as well, since sports heroes who die young get written about a lot (i.e. there's a wealth of citable source material). And of course Stephen Hendry has a perpetual top ranker is probably worth focusing on and raising to

4671:

of their contributions for an extra level of scrutiny. I often check users' contribution histories for additional problems to fix if I see them making bad edits (especially over the repeated objections and warnings of others), and plenty of other editors do this as

802:

raising are valid. What's wrong with that? I'm not hiding anything at all. Why can ATT proponents plan and coordinate (off-wiki, where they can't be seen), but those with concerns about it can't, even publicly? Is it just because I mentioned the word "revert"? —

1523:

Interested. I'm not sure how much time I'd devote to it, all things considered, but there're definitely some "career spammers" on here. Even just on the billiards/pool articles I have to fend off the same spammerators under different usernames every few months. —

2219: 4662:

here; 99.99% of the time source citations are for real (though maybe only 95% of the time sufficiently accurate; people do check sources to make sure that WP article facts being attributed to that source are actually what the source said). Editors who are acting

3870:

used to represent NIR outside of specific contexts, it gives good ammunition to prevent editwarring to restore abuse of the template when it is removed from inappropriate articles (i.e. use an edit summary like "Rm. 1953-1972 NI govt. flag, per flag template's

243:

been broadcast in the US. Migel Torres (a professional in Queens New York) told me this earlier today (in his best approximation of English), and also told me that he has been giving lessons to Mike Massey. I'm not sure what is being broadcast, but I know that

3480:

Hi, would you be able to do that split you talked about? I am unsure how to, or what you mean by, a disambiguation page for this article. Normally these pages are used for duplications? And like you said, eight-ball and blackball are considerably different?

2838:

I agree 100% that all user categories should be renamed to actually be of encyclopedic use (i.e. change all "who likes", "who listens to", "who supports", etc.) in the long run, but I think it should be done in group noms. Nominating a single category like

884:

Correction: on second thought, the "in broad suppport" section etc. does follow the section-heading guidelines re following on watchlists (I meant watchlists and edit summaries, not talk pages). It was some of the earlier proposed wordings that didn't.

4807:

If we were to add that, from the crowds that attend White's matches and exhibitions, he is widely 'considered' .... or that, based on his world title and other championship wins, Davis is widely considered......, how would that fit in with Wiki policy?

2796:

As you may have noticed I stepped up and got active with it. PS: If you can find it (some groceries in the SW carry it, dried in clear plastic bags with paper tops, like the Mexican spices and stuff), look for blue corn posole. It is smaller and more

1088:

understand this? Probably no, so we be a little more specific/educational for them, even if some of the prose might be a little tedious to a snooker maven (who is probably here to work on the article, not learn anything from it anyway, right?) :-) —

2970: 822:

quite a lot like asking other people to help your reverting so that your side "wins" while none of the involved break the 3RR individually. Aka gaming the system. Now I'm not saying that was your intent here but it sure is what it sounds like.

2447:

Eh. I don't think anyone can rationally hold an extremist non-compromise position in the debate at all any longer, on either side. The entire thing is so farcical, I'm just backing away warily and going back to writing an encyclopedia. —

1333:

Thanks. What scares me though is that all of those "users" combined don't equate to nearly enough activity for a user that knows as much as this person does about the finers points of WP policy and how to game them. This means that the

771:. This sounds like you're asking for other people to help "your" side of a revert war, which is not a proper way to resolve anything. Please don't do that again, and instead discuss a more productive approach on the relevant talk page. 5326:

This "Fromowner" stuff is a two-author random idea from last month, that has no consensus whatsoever, has not been through the formal Proposal process, is so disused it doesn't even have a talk page, and is in direct contravention of

344:

Thanks for responding. I meant no offense, so I hope you didn't take any. Much of the trivia section appears to be truly trivial. I've added a {{toomuchtrivia}} tag; maybe someone who is truly interested in this bio will edit it

3191:

for the items cleanup/disputes that are for talk pages instead of article pages, just to keep them separate (needs infobox, needs photo, etc. Anyway, I think I'm done for the night other than "processing" the last two newly-found

1912:"Finally, once the nomination has been accepted and the questions answered, the nominee should transclude it on the RfA page when they are ready for the RfA to begin. Alternatively, the candidate may ask the nominator to do so." 4578:

of web pages and PDF files in the world that Google can find, not one of them uses this nickname for him. Even a credible website like WorldSnooker would be fine as a source, but there's just no source. Try Googling for:

5763: 4658:-pushing kooks do sometimes blatantly lie about what a source says or even make up a source that doesn't exist. These are usually found out pretty quickly at least in articles with any significant editorship. Overall we 1926:

It's not late for many people. The only reason I can think of is that some of the newer ones there will probably have been removed by then, thus freeing up people's attention. I still think you should go live now, though.

4591:(the -Rage is to get rid of false positives that refer to the band Rage Againt the Machine; and -Knowledge (XXG) because WP can't source itself.) There's just nothing relevant at all. I'll add the alleged nickname to 2711:

Thanks! I haven't actually been running much with snooker articles for the past few weeks, partly due to holidays and time away from WP. What time I have had I have been investing it in modelling a 3D snooker table,

3234:

I can't get a reference in the above article to work. It's the one that relates to the amount of money Higgins is supposed to have squandered. Can you see what the error is and fix it, or let me know and I'll do it?

2801:

than the regular kind, and must be cooked longer, but the results are stellar, and it can be successfully frozen if you make a big batch (the regular white-hominy kind turns into goop if you freeze and thaw it). —

4722:

Thank you for the notice. Although the uninsured driver thing was inconclusive, at least we proved something. Anyways, as long as the Jeff Defender and his socks stay inactive in RFA, things will be fine.

4969:;-) The point being, I think the profile has very recently become high enough with that article that some slower consensus-seeking vs. faster WP:BOLD wikihaviour is probably called for now. Thoughts? — 3672:(the template you had to move the spacing of), and will likely create many more such templates, can you explain what I should keep in mind when placing them in articles in close proximity to stub tags?-- 1969:

I am ready to go live, just didn't want you to be rushed, but you posted lickety-split. Stanton, are you ready? By the way, if I haven't already made this clear, to the both of you: much appreciated.--

663:

PS: I think my "Nah, everyone..." paragraph above will seem a little less self-contradictory now. By intuitive, I meant just what you did by "two millennia". But note that even in books and stuff we

308:

this should be done. Unfortunately, I do not have time to do it myself right now, but if you are interested in the article, perhaps you would like to take a crack at it. Thanks, and happy editing!--

1109:

You are right to say that there is a wide range of accessories now available. In the cotext of the recent overhaul of the article, to cut down on its size and make it more readable and less involved,

1377:

goals (pushing COI articles and minority POVs in other articles, making trouble for those who oppose them, and trying to influence blocking and banning policy to make it easier to be disruptive.) —

5094:

Nope, and has me a bit puzzled too. I'm provisionally chalking it up to me doing too sleepy to notice that AWB was doing that, and more to the point, wasn't even doing any stub-retagging (d'oh).

4747:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!

5440:

It should have an essay tag on it already, but anyway if you see a Knowledge (XXG):-namespace page that doesn't specifically say it is a policy or guideline, then it isn't one. Hope that helps. —

3882:

and go do it (if you understand how noinclude/includeonly work); I'm skeptical that anyone could have a legitimate disagreement with such a warning. But a short discussion about what it should

1945:

NB: I think the answers were well-crafted anyway. Any input I'd get in would just be twiddles, and a third party has already voted, so even if it's not listed, it's already been found. :-) —

533:

Nah, everyone on WP for more than a few days understands bottom-posting. I find it really annoying when I encounter the few remaining XfD and other adminny process pages that actually want

638:

page has a mini-essay about this topic, under the notability one. I may have muddled something above to sound anti-top-posting in general; it's more that I've just given up here. WP is

4866:

candidates so far (in snooker, I'm suspecting Steve Davis will eventually get there after more "magazine" cleanup, and if someone really starts digging for additional life-story facts,

1293:

Yep, and no worries on just going for it; on second thought it probably is important to address this right now, when they are causing RfA trouble again, rather than wait any longer! —

3173:

That sounds good, though I guess both should be examined to make sure their purposes aren't subtly different; I remain skeptical that they would be, and a CFD seems like a good idea.

524:

of that edit section. That would make it voter-friendly. What do you think? I mean someone has to really demonstrate intelligence to find the place to vote Oppose as it is now. --

1736: 4654:

for example, wouldn't be a reliable source for anything but me being nutty. But newspapers and magazines with significant distributions aren't generally problematic. And yes,

2786:

I have just been bold and kicked the tires on this thing, let's see if she rolls. And god you made me hungry for posole dammit. Not going to drive down there today in the snow.

4474:

It's as useful as the WikiThanks flower, but I can use it for things that aren't directly related to me (whereas I use the flower for things I've benefited from). I've already

2675:

If you don't want to file an RfC, so much the better. I may not find the incentive to do so myself; my offer stands, however. I will let you know if a project gets underway.

2438:

I see his position as a terrible compromise that undermines much of the merge's intention, ok, that was overstating it a bit, but it is not really a support for the merge. --

1823: 5499:

Surely we're all allowed to change our mind and think again. Geni's protect reason is giving me second thought. Where exactly is this template used- I've never seen it...

5867: 1682: 642:"everything must be bottom posted" that I get used to it here, and find the handful of top-posting pages to be jarring. My real feel is that top-posting is good (except 5518:

Wasn't saying you can't, was just asking why. Anyway, there's zero evidence to date that there is any "new upload system" that this is part of. It's being used to put

2327:

admin, like delete or protect pages, but it could nuke vandal edits, and even leave them vandal warnings, in about two clicks (one for the former alone). <sigh: -->

1465: 1422: 1246: 5866:

to start talking about any potential compromise on the attribution policy issue. Perahaps you can add the page to your watchlist. I have also mentioned this page in

451:

Hmmm, torn on this one. It's just about the only decent SVG editor out there, and having more people know about it would be a boon for commons. <scratches head: -->

537:

posting. I don't know what they are thinking. If I could reboot WP from scratch, top posting would be the norm, because it is far more useful and intuitive, but I

3175:

They do serve different purposes! The former is a cat. for future and specific-year type templates (in general); the latter is for time-related maint. templates.

297: 4165:

on the Northern Ireland page over the infobox to try and stop us removing the flag, they were told that if there was no offical flag then none should be used.--

2858:

Just trying to get the ball rolling. I'm effectively managing 2.5 (as it were) active WikiProjects and I don't have all that much time for XfD championing. I

2726:

That's pretty cool! Could indeed come in handy for illustrating glossary terms and stuff, if the balls can be moved around and the scene re-rendered easily. —

1857:

Um, sorry if I wasn't clear. Just go to the nomination page and replace the sentence after "Co-nomination:" with your paragraph(s). There's NO other procedure.

5013:

PS: The World Snooker Championships are on at the moment, extensively covered by the BBC in the UK, which may cause an influx of more noobs. Just a warning.

3154: 3126: 727:

Agreed. Thanks for writing back so quick. :-) Sadly, no real tea for me; have to take the trash out before the trucks come around for it. (IRL, I mean). —

3924:

route, as I don't want to risk messing up the template, nor am I sure which template actually contains the icon, as many templates seem to link to others.--

2265:

Thank you right back! :-) PS: Any criticism in your RfA is intended only and absolutely constructively. I'm sure you'll make a fine admin around here. —

1905: 818:

Of course I'm looking if you answer me. And of course you can discuss or organize all you like. But the phrasing "I don't want to break 3RR so please help"

328:

notable (not to mention not a copy-paste copyvio from IMDb...), otherwise I might well have eliminated the Trivia section by merge & refactor myself. —

4914:

This has nothing to do with my personal AWB scripts - it's a built-in feature of AWB. If you're unhappy about it, plesse raise on the AWB discussion page.

3997: 3875: 5863: 4080: 3993: 3887: 3842: 3582:, or was last time I looked), between the stub tag and everything that precedes it. There are probably a few other stub tags with hardcoded <br /: --> 2916: 2895: 3160:

P.S. It looks like both you and I are categorizing templates this evening. If you want me to stop until you are finished, please let me know. Thank you.

4676: 4619: 4544: 4262: 711:

I don't think that would be a bad idea for anyone involved in that debate, really. And yes, the number of people that support something is certainly a

2848:

the current (even if unofficial) naming conventions. I highly recommend going with group nominations, or I doubt you will get anything accomplished.

2126:

i admit i have done sily vandalism on wikipedia, and i am sorry. But i have also made over 100 constructive edits on ip addressess and on the account

715:

in determining consensus, but a "Support, why not?" or "Oppose, this is dumb" tends to get a lot less weight than a well-written, coherent rationale.

4679:

comment was added by..." stuff appended to your posts by the signature bot (this is not a good thing; it marks an editor as a newbie or careless. :-)

2186: 3431: 2749:. Yeah the balls can all be moved about, and render times are only a couple of minutes for 800x600. I kind of had inspiration for it when I saw 4595:, and note that it needs sourcing, and maybe someone with some older snooker magazines or something can do so. Sounds like a good compromise. — 4108:

months to get the flag removed from the Northern Ireland Infobox, and into the main article, yet they are still arguing for it to be put back.--

4592: 3980: 3934: 3871: 1916:

When you are ready, tell me and then we'll go live (I see no reason why it couldn't wait until tomorrow evening if that's better; it's late).--

1084:

controversial hook for that matter) they would have been more specific. I approach all of this stuff from a usability angle though - will the

5742: 3979:

using the abc points from the other discussion, and will post you a link when I have done so, to see what you think before I post it into the

3933:

The "master" template for the NIR flag, regardless which of the flag icon (country name, country abbreviation, flag only, etc.) is called, is

2350:; looks like we may get to keep it. Sandbaggers suuuck. I was out at the Dragon Horn (my league team's host bar) for pool - just re-watched 3849:

Could you explain to me how this works, what effect would a abuse warning on the template have, and how would one go about asking for one.--

4650:

offers some guidance. Just because it's on dead trees doesn't automatically make it a good source - my (hypothetical) self-published book

4623: 4548: 4191: 5416: 5309: 4667:

are rarely able to hide this fact for long, and if someone is consistently a problem editor in one place, it tends to call into question

1767:

Hi there! No, Stanton is not a typical Norwegian name - and not my real name I must admit. I've taken the name from the best movie ever:

1130:

I think I can buy most of that. If you want to revert the caption expansion, go ahead, though please leave the cuegloss link to Rest. —

856:

automatic reverters. But in this case I would expect the reversal, which I am probably too late to affect, will be reverted out of sheer

3666: 1238: 2766: 2716:, partly for my own enjoyment, but I am also sure some renders of it can be put to good use in wikipedia articles at pertinent places! 1421:

I am sorry if I was so extreme about blocking. Its a matter of jumping to conclusions vs. taking things on a case by case basis. See

1259:

Argh... I wasn't really ready to proceed just yet. Well, since it has started, I'll do what I can, but I was still investigating... —

860:; independent of its merits, it wasn't invented by the small group of editors who pat each other on the back, so it must be nonsense. 3043:

article for a long while and, on investigation yesterday, noticed your excellent work on related articles. So a bit of both, I guess.

1116:

will ask specifically for it. And I'd say that the varieties of spiders in use are not rests: they are spiders. Keep up the good work

1497: 3920:

Thanks, that gives me a better understanding of the process. I would rather discuss the issue on the wording rather then going the

1620: 1573: 1496:

You're probably busy with other priorities on Knowledge (XXG) for now, but when you have the time, I encourage you to check out the

1004:

But you do great work with that page and others, and I'm not going to change it but think you should. What about "a standard rest"?

4084: 452:

Are we only allowed to mention software hosted by the wikimedia foundation, or is all software we use to maintain the site ok? --

133:

new userboxes I found! However, calling yourself a native American English man and using French spacing is sickening. Sickening! ~

5415:

Well, Knowledge (XXG) policies usually have the "Knowledge (XXG):" thing in the namespace, so since this "fromowner" thing is at

4842:

that a player is popular, or cite sports statistics ("seven-time World Champion, with a record 56 ranking tournament wins") that

4079:. Ultimately I chalk that up to my own inability to get the point across better, I guess. At any rate, I think the proposal at 97: 5258:

Rather than tweaking the existing wording, please have a look at the draft new wording, and comment if you wish. See talk page.

4346:

I changed it so that the word image and the size did not need to be entered into the article. Most infoboxs are done like this.

359:

No offense taken! I was just trying to make it clear that "if you are interested in the article" didn't apply to me. :-) The

2844: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 5642:

Thanks. Does this mean you're a co-nominator, or are you just effectively fulfilling an informal editprotected on my part? —

2312:, inveighing with me against mean bot tagging, creating needed images, the arcane book comparisons, being a billiards fan...-- 647:

the page, but it's hard to tell where... if spent on actually writing an encyclopedia... Wow, WP would be so much better! —

619:

vi versus emacs, anti-aliased vs aliased, white background vs black background, top vs bottom posting, it's the holy wars! ;-)

5812:

Hey - In regards to our previous discussion on group noms to change naming conventions, I thought you might be interested in

2398: 1768: 1625: 1578: 1284:

Thanks a lot for the evidences. Now the case I'm pretty sure they are sockpuppets and I hope the reviewers think so as well.

1183: 239:

On May 6, 2007 ESPN will for the first time broadcast professional 3-cushion. It may also be the first time 3-cushion has

3308:

I've located it ok now Stanton and page updated accordingly. That site uses frames, which I haven#t seen for some times.

2840: 2753:- thinking that it would be useful to create versions in 3D for various setups/situations to help explain things better. 2640: 1490: 410: 5547: 5523: 4961: 1074: 1066: 1058: 1050: 1016: 5522:-transgressing upload exhortations and instructions into the infobox "|image=" lines of hundreds of bio articles, with 3427: 3150: 2251: 2204: 5348: 4675:

PS: You should sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes at the end (~~~~) or you'll keep having "The preceding

3805:

since "by right" the unarticle there should surely be about the game. Heh. The Wanderone quote is for real, too. —

5762:

Please note that the above project page is currently being proposed for deletion. The discussion is taking place at

5301: 3188: 3184: 3179:

PS: Nah, I don't see that we're overlapping any other than on one template (see CFD under speedy; moving to rename

1841:

Just replace "Please allow me to serve as an additional nominator" with your paragraph(s) and remember to sign it.

172:

Ambig. term. I definitely don't engage in 'placing a single space before a question or exclamation mark'. Ick! —

38: 4646:

Paper sources are generally not problematic because they can usually be verified at libraries if all else fails.

4067:

Can you see now why I wanted to do this, some of them are just determined to push their own POV on this matter.--

3737: 3562: 2032: 937:

Those are rather old threads and I'm not one to bear a grudge. I don't really see a reason to dig them up again.

3662:

Hey Stanton! I'm not sure where this discussion started so I'm having trouble following it, but since I created

3012: 483:

Bravo! Good insight! Brilliant! How about if we propose to everyone that the "Neutral" section should appear

4627: 4552: 2879: 2750: 1615: 1581: 1568: 3180: 4194:. Could you take the time to dig up that specific RFC page? I believe it would come in very, very handy. — 2862:

agree with you that massive multi-noms are needed, I just don't think I'm in a position to do them myself. —

1014:

I'm not sure where you are playing, but there are at least 4 rests (not counting American-style rakes). See

5767: 4026: 3771:

Fuhghettaboutit, did you catch the 3 hours of WPBA action on ESPN-2 today? Schweet. And it's actually from

2585: 1232: 5870:, so there is public awareness of this discussion. Hopefully you will be willing to participate. Thanks. 1641:

I'm sure we'll both live. :-) I added a note below it that should prevent others from moving it again. —

607:

Latin script has been written from top-left to bottom right for over two millenia. Define "intuitive". ;-)

3423: 2575: 1439:), and continue to show up out of no where to do little other than attack people in RfA and make noise at 363: 5551: 5365: 5087: 3698:

Great. Thanks for the explanation. Just wanted to make sure. You're my "go to guy" for template issues.--

3546: 3187:

which is what the cat is really for. The others can all go in cleanup/dispute/etc.) Also created a new

2567: 425:. Templates such as this one point users and editors to free software they can use to create free works. 5457: 5420: 5391: 5356: 5355:. That image is used on hundreds of articles, including many major articles and seems pretty widly used. 5317: 5174: 4229: 3878:

isn't going to be watchlisted by many editors, even from the Flag Template project. You could also just

3099: 2571: 1994:

Okay gonna go figure it out--probably just placing the name of the nom in template form into rfa page.--

47: 17: 5154: 5144: 4744: 2155: 2127: 1696: 1179: 570:

Great ideas! I'm glad I checked in just as you were having your brilliant insight. See you later. --

5055: 5024: 3796: 3734: 3699: 3673: 3559: 3370: 3066: 3052: 2997: 2787: 2680: 2648: 2417:

doesn't particularly bother me; I just ignore it. Some of these folks are going way beyond bossy. —

2313: 1995: 1970: 1917: 1774:"Stone village" would translate to something like "Steinby" in Norwegian. Cheers, and happy editing! 1686: 865: 422: 250: 4823: 3492: 3473: 5813: 5685: 5678:

I see it more as fulfilling an editprotected request. But I'm likely to support your nomination...

5615: 5561: 5506: 4986:

contrary. That needs to change or things are going get really messy-like next time this happens. —

4915: 3419: 3238:

Sorry for my lack of expertise but, for the life of me, I cannot see what I'm doing wrong. Thanks,

2597: 4819: 4130: 3409:

My comment would have been more transparent if edit summaries supported italics: "Matrona doesn't

1771:. It is the name on the grave next to the unknown grave where the treasure is buried, remember?? 1175: 1171: 5399:

Where have you seen anyone say this is a policy or guideline? They should not be saying that. —

4421:

Happens to us all every once in a while. ;) Hope to see ya around the project's page. Regards, --

3890:. The warning should also go in the dox for any deprecated or stand-alone alias templates, like 3554: 2354:, so I was very in that mood. Beat this pretty good shot 5x in a row. Realized by game 7 he was 1775: 1426: 1397: 1228: 938: 824: 772: 716: 5437: 5208: 2581: 1611: 1587: 5428:

That's definitely an unsafe assumption. Unless it has a policy header at the top of it (as at

4501:

Heh. Thanks! I guess I should add it to the barnstars list in the "personal awards" section. —

2917:

Knowledge (XXG):User_categories_for_discussion#Category:Wikipedians_who_support_F.C._Copenhagen

2185:

I know we haven't always seen eye to eye in the past, but I'm indebted to you for your help in

604:

Because it's hard to understand in what order things were said. Why is top posting a bad idea?

3440:

Ah, I get you. And agree that there is some pretty strange junk in some of these articles. —

3322: 1042: 5519: 5328: 5059: 4655: 3921: 3879: 3643: 3624: 3579: 1435:

knowing all about Knowledge (XXG) policies, guidelines and essays (yet have track records of

1022:

in the Glossary. The disambiguation and specificity are needed to avoid reader confusion. —

305: 301: 5883: 5829: 5779: 5715: 5699: 5645: 5583: 5529: 5443: 5402: 5376: 5334: 5271: 5225: 5160: 5110: 4989: 4972: 4927: 4881: 4762: 4685: 4598: 4504: 4408: 4360: 4301: 4197: 4136: 4090: 4051: 4003: 3973: 3944: 3903: 3863: 3808: 3778: 3710: 3685: 3649: 3630: 3608: 3591: 3514: 3498: 3443: 3290: 3252: 3198: 3111: 3022: 2932: 2865: 2805: 2729: 2662: 2606: 2533: 2478: 2451: 2434: 2420: 2363: 2328:

I miss that. Rollback, rollback... Even simulated the good-faith rollback option. As for

2268: 2234: 2137: 2091: 2055: 1981: 1948: 1787: 1735:

I've went through the case and felt a checkuser is definitely needed, I've just filed it on

1702: 1644: 1593: 1527: 1447: 1408: 1380: 1341: 1296: 1262: 1196: 1133: 1092: 1025: 970: 900: 805: 730: 678: 650: 635: 630:

newest; which makes some sense. But Wiki for some reason went too far with this, and wants

611: 582: 545: 506: 453: 438: 372: 331: 262: 200: 188:

Oh my! British American punctuation too?! Now I've really begun to run for for the hills. ~

175: 146: 5429: 5370: 4965: 4659: 4452: 4162: 4126: 3584: 3095: 2238: 2191: 1275:

Sorry for starting it too early, but I will investigate and do my best as well. Thank you!

766: 5187: 4541:

The Article on Anthony is merely a stub and I was seeking to expand it, if only a little.

4266: 4233: 4166: 4109: 4068: 4040: 4030: 3984: 3925: 3850: 3627:; not sure why, since the issue has certainly not been fixed in the stub template code. — 3482: 3044: 2989: 2746: 2713: 2676: 2644: 2079: 2040: 1932: 1894: 1878: 1862: 1846: 1831: 1515: 1505: 886: 876: 861: 143:

or so. I find the matter rather silly, since it is clearly an aid to readabilty. :-) —

4872: 4863: 4796: 4664: 4647: 2088:

Heh. No worries. I just thought it might look funky if the co-nom's vote came later. —

1440: 1436: 5554:. Might it be better if I just tagged it for MfD and then you can write the nomination? 4569:

be reliable. The old idea of just "throw it now, source it later" is simply unworkable.

5891: 5874: 5871: 5837: 5820: 5787: 5770: 5723: 5707: 5691: 5680: 5653: 5621: 5610: 5591: 5567: 5556: 5537: 5512: 5501: 5460: 5451: 5423: 5410: 5394: 5384: 5359: 5342: 5320: 5279: 5262: 5233: 5215: 5212: 5177: 5168: 5147: 5118: 5098: 5066: 5063: 5027: 5017: 5008: 4997: 4980: 4935: 4918: 4889: 4859: 4812: 4770: 4750: 4727: 4693: 4631: 4606: 4556: 4512: 4492: 4425: 4422: 4416: 4398: 4395: 4368: 4350: 4309: 4269: 4236: 4232:

to which it recieved a number of replies, I will try and dig out the RFC page for it.--

4205: 4169: 4144: 4112: 4098: 4071: 4059: 4043: 4033: 4011: 3987: 3952: 3928: 3911: 3853: 3816: 3799: 3786: 3718: 3702: 3693: 3676: 3657: 3616: 3599: 3522: 3506: 3485: 3451: 3434: 3384: 3381: 3312: 3298: 3273: 3260: 3242: 3206: 3167: 3164: 3119: 3102: 3091: 3057: 3030: 3002: 2940: 2923: 2886: 2873: 2852: 2813: 2790: 2757: 2737: 2720: 2684: 2670: 2652: 2614: 2541: 2523: 2486: 2469: 2459: 2442: 2428: 2405: 2371: 2316: 2276: 2256: 2209: 2158: 2145: 2130:. I promise i will never vandalise wikipedia again and i will only make legit edits. 2099: 2083: 2063: 2044: 1998: 1989: 1973: 1956: 1936: 1920: 1898: 1882: 1866: 1850: 1835: 1795: 1778: 1743: 1710: 1689: 1652: 1628: 1601: 1535: 1517: 1429: 1416: 1400: 1388: 1370: 1349: 1327: 1304: 1288: 1279: 1270: 1253: 1204: 1187: 1141: 1120: 1100: 1033: 1008: 978: 961: 908: 889: 879: 869: 847: 813: 795: 738: 721: 686: 658: 614: 590: 574: 553: 528: 514: 492: 456: 446: 429: 380: 354: 339: 317: 270: 253: 245: 208: 192: 183: 167: 160: 154: 137: 5456:

I guess you're right. I'll keep an eye out for the policy header thing in the future.

5433: 4792: 4470:, award Stanton McCandlish the Minor Barnstar Point for the creation of said Barnstar. 4000:

isn't going to be watchlisted by many editors, even from the Flag Template project. —

2218: 5817: 5308:

I think that image you removed from the Liam Neeson article was suppose to be there.

5014: 5005: 4480: 4458: 3087: 2883: 2849: 2343: 418: 350: 313: 4039:

Do I have to vote seperately in that or is the fact I proposed it taken as a vote.--

5353:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Image:Replace_this_image1.svg&redirect=no

4855: 3938: 3937:, but as noted there are some lingering stand-alone templates of this sort such as 3894: 3332: 2985: 2920: 2754: 2717: 1359: 1316: 571: 525: 489: 5209:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Ireland_national_rugby_union_team#Flags_and_shamrocks

3418:

very little – or, in this case, alleged that a name was derived from itself (à la

3350:

The properties dialog box will have a field called "Address" which contains a URL.

5526:. And Geni is not in a position to protect his own little one-person project. — 4809: 3309: 3270: 3239: 2520: 2466: 2439: 2402: 2332: 2306: 2052:

I fixed a wrong username in the stats, but that's all that looked "off" to me.—

1117: 1005: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5347:

It seems that the "Fromowner" stuff is pretty wide spread. also take a look at

5316:". So you probably shouldn't have removed it, since it is suppose to be there. 5259: 4740: 4724: 4347: 3874:." I think this should be proposed just below the previous discussion, since 3344: 2243: 2196: 2075: 2036: 1928: 1890: 1874: 1858: 1842: 1827: 1784:

Ah! I haven't seen that movie since I was about 11, so I didn't remember! —

1740: 1512: 1405:

I've already suggested that admin examination will be necessary in the SSP. —

1285: 1276: 1250: 5023:

stem to stern, will I think be the only one of its kind on Knowledge (XXG)?--

2074:

pitfall of RfA's. You could of course add an exasperating note in your vote.

671:, which is why I think new replies in extant threads should be bottom posted 5390:

image back. If it's not an actual policy, then alright, I'll remember that.

5095: 4867: 4854:

Two good examples (last I looked at them) of encyclopedic language would be

4574:

The problem in Hamilton's case, to get back on point, is that of all of the

2969: 1501: 1500:(where all the real work occurs). In particular, take a look at the work of 189: 164: 134: 5764:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Linkification

2578:. Do you have any objection to this, or to deleting the now-unused image? — 5351:. Also, take a look at the list of articles that use that use that image: 1075: 1059: 967:

Okeydokey. Just making sure they don't get archived before their time. —

5314:

should be placed on articles about people that have no current free image

4190:

I'm in the midst of a necessarily fast-moving dispute resolution over at

3742: 3567: 3040: 3016: 2878:

Hey again. Just thought you might want to read (and perhaps comment) on

1067: 1051: 1017: 499:

toward +, for no other discernable reason. The arguments haven't changed

414: 346: 309: 852:

I know what he's talking about; a handful of editors, strongly pro-ATT,

426: 4862:. In the non-snooker cue sports article, these are probably our best 3983:

talk page for discussion on the wording, thanks again for your help.--

2843:

is very likely to fail, but making a group nom called something like "

1193:

I haven't interacted with you enough to have anything to criticize. —

5268:

What's NFC again? I looked at WP:NFC, but I've never edited that. —

4078:

to deal with it by preventing partisan use of the flag. <sigh: -->

3886:

is probably a Good Thing, so I'd go the talk page proposal route at

2984:

Awarded for your tireless work on articles relating to the field of

675:

while new threads should be top-posted, because they're new/news. —

259:

Glad I still have VCR. I'll tape that. Thanks for the heads-up! —

3287:

real, direct URL out of that; I'm pretty good with such geekery. —

4733: 4451: 2194:

report. If you ever need help, don't hesitate to drop me a line.

857: 634:

thing bottom posted (except at a few hold-out process pages). My

4129:

as a first stage dispute resolution (some day it could end up at

2134:

Thank you; that would be a very good re-start as a Wikipedian. —

3745: 3570: 3366:

Right-click again on "http". Choose "Copy" from the popup menu.

3358:

Right-click on "http". Choose "Select all" from the popup menu.

1557: 5766:, if you would wish to take part in the discussion. Thank you. 4846:

that the player is at the top of the field, but never actually

4584:"Anthony Hamilton" "the Machine" snooker -Knowledge (XXG) -Rage 4298:

Thx. I've added a comment to it, since the RFC remains open. —

3553:

Should all stub templtes incorporate a break as illustrated in

1038:

PS: As my edit summary suggested, just invert the order of the

3269:

Great! Sometimes a guardian angel isn't a bad idea after all.

2433:

But the position WAS is taking is very much a compromise that

1731:

Checkuser showed that User:Jeff Defender was in fact a puppet.

25: 4478:

one within an hour of seeing it mentioned on your user page.

2338:

I'm surprised it didn't get attacked by some citation purism

769:

over this, so additional eyes on the matter would be helpful"

4732: 4133:

but I would avoid that at nearly-all costs if possible.) —

2639:

You might want to reconsider Mikkalai's project, outlined

4565:

sourcing the existing material, or the encyclopedia will

3583:'s in them that need to have this removed. Someday when 1737:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for checkuser/Case/Jeff Defender

5211:

when making edits to Irish rugby player articles. Thanks

1482:

Declining invitation; am in too many projects already...

5352: 4475: 3992:

Cool, though again: I think this should be proposed at

2519:

Thank you for the barnstar, very much appreciated :) -

1564: 1356: 130: 5058:

was blocked indefinitely due to the reasons stated in

2834:

I agree, but don't have time to participate right now.

2154:

Thank you, please dont contact BT. I am all good now.

2070:

Sorry, I moved your comment back where it was. That's

2031:

I don't know. A few things (lowercase names, mathbot,

1824:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_adminship/Fuhghettaboutit

5862:

I've suggested getting the Working Group together at

5173:

Yes, and no doubt with a different IP address again.

4048:

Nah, being the proponent means you support it. :-) —

2635:

I'm backing out of the entire WP:ATT debate, I think.

2529:

See good work, throw star. Is Ninja way. <nod: -->

1357:

In the words of the immortal Jay-Z: "Ya boy is back."

323:

I'm well aware of WP:TRIV. While that article still

5331:, a very long-standing Knowledge (XXG) Guideline. — 5203:

Discussion never continued, and I don't care anyway.

4228:

I will try and find it, the request was placed here

3623:

PS: Actually, the spacing is no longer mentioned at

3039:

I've followed your significant contributions to the

2237:

for sleuthing out sockpuppets being used to subvert

1466:

Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Jeff Defender

1423:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Betacommand

1247:

Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Jeff Defender

4718:

We just done for now until this jerks act up again.

4265:

dated 4th April 2007, about halfway downthe list.--

1739:. Hopefully that will give the conclusion. Cheers! 5105:The Mysterious Case of the Haunted AutoWikiBrowser 1681:Regarding your recent post at ATT, you might find 1048:links in the caption, so it reads something like " 4924:Argh. Will do, and sorry for the false alarm. — 4818:Davis needs one too. Such terminology is called 4230:Talk:Northern_Ireland#Request_for_Comment:Infobox 4125:If it gets any worse, it may need to be taken to 763:Hi there! I notice that you made statements like 298:Knowledge (XXG):Avoid trivia sections in articles 4960:I've been trying to instill some procedure into 4834:of it by citing facts that illustrate greatness. 3086:"Siamfarbenes means: color looks like that of a 2465:listening, and have fun with the real work :) -- 1508:-- probably the two best at the sleuthing part. 1486:I am really impressed by your detective skills. 5550:is being added to articles and it redirects to 4753:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 4081:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Flag Template 3994:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Flag Template 3888:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Flag Template 3843:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Flag Template 3605:has a spacing effect in the article! D'oh.) — 3011:Why, thank you! Is this in reference to the 1425:. As for your RFA, you can always try again. 1245:Due to your concerns raised on a RFA, I filed 4263:Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_comment/Politics 2919:. I've responded to your suggestion there. -- 2035:) already tripped me up. So no thank you. =P 435:It's still spammy. W* is not Sourceforge. — 8: 5844:Working Group - Trying to start a discussion 4192:Talk:World Snooker Championship 2007#Dispute 3155:Category:Time and date maintenance templates 3127:Category:Time and date maintenance templates 5696:Noted. Should be up in about 2 minutes. — 3998:Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland 3876:Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland 3328:Right-click on an empty space in the pane. 1511:Again, nice work on the sockpuppet case! -- 3996:just below the previous discussion, since 3969:I will have ago in my sandbox at making a 2593:No problem, other than it is also used in 1249:, please add evidence if you can. Thanks! 5743:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Linkification 4851:common in sports and rock music articles. 3340:Choose "Properties" from the popup menu. 2216: 1717:Jeff Defender sock puppetry --- checkuser 1241:) was in fact proven to be a sock puppet. 5864:Wikipedia_talk:Attribution/Working_Group 4394:make a lot of sense, would you agree? -- 3732:workload (negative instruction creep!). 2566:Hello Stanton McCandlish. I've replaced 2322:That's half of what I'm here for. : --> 5417:Knowledge (XXG):Fromowner documentation 5310:Knowledge (XXG):Fromowner documentation 4389:Boneheaded misunderstanding on my part. 3108:Thanks. Updated the English version. — 2896:Wikipedians_who_support_F.C._Copenhagen 3981:Template:Country data Northern Ireland 3249:in the ==References== section. :-) — 3090:. The mutation is incomplete dominant 3082:Updated target page per info provided. 2967: 2767:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject New Mexico 1685:. Thanks again for the nomination:-)-- 1590:. Why confuse the vote on purpose? — 667:(i.e. new topic) at the top left, and 520:the voter could enter the vote at the 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3369:The entire URL will be copied to the 1541: 7: 5373:pretty soon and will not survive. — 1315:Nice work unearthing this, Stanton. 4085:Knowledge (XXG):Don't overuse flags 3361:The entire URL will be highlighted. 2841:Category:Wikipedians who use Google 1565:I put it under support for a reason 411:Template talk:Created with Inkscape 409:Here's the answer you requested at 291:Clarified my position; no response. 4743:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 3458:List of World Eight-ball Champions 3094:have one Copy of the gene and the 1805:Something you may be interested in 1683:this recent afd debate interesting 1542:Please don't move my vote again... 221:3-cushion coming out of the closet 24: 4533:Mutually satisfactory compromise. 4519:Anthony Hamilton (snooker player) 3321:Here is a trick I picked up with 3248:Just needed <references /: --> 2227:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 1338:puppeteer has yet to be outed. — 1080:variety)". I'll just go do that. 405:An "agree to disagree" situation. 5849: 5799: 5749: 5486: 5291: 5245: 5194: 5130: 5086:Overall discussion has moved to 5077: 5041: 4947: 4901: 4782: 4709: 4524: 4439: 4380: 4333: 3832: 3758: 3536: 3463: 3396: 3218: 3133: 3073: 2968: 2952: 2915:Thanks for your contribution at 2902: 2825: 2773: 2698: 2626: 2553: 2506: 2383: 2288: 2217: 2172: 2113: 2018: 1889:Oops, enjoy your dinner. Sorry! 1810: 1754: 1722: 1668: 1547: 1473: 1219: 1157: 990: 924: 759:I've simply been misinterpreted. 750: 698: 470: 396: 282: 226: 116: 29: 5143:You did a good job last night. 5125:Snooker World Championship 2007 4087:will eventually sort it out. — 3353:The URL will start with "http". 2845:Category:Wikipedians by website 2190:compiled an extremely detailed 1567:. Read the hidden comment. -- 369:tag sounds like a good plan. — 5349:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Fromowner 5302:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Fromwoner 2574:}} with inline text styled by 1769:The Good, the Bad and the Ugly 1695:Thanks. Made note of this at 1: 5858:Discussion is at the WG page. 5548:Image:Replace this image1.svg 5546:Ah, I'm starting to see now- 5524:Image:Replace this image1.svg 5240:Your edit to the NFC criteria 3185:Category:To do list templates 2588:14:27:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2027:RfA has long since concluded. 1819:RfA has long since concluded. 1444:Someone else nominated me. — 465:You have discovered something 5432:) or a guideline one (as at 5054:Just you know, the username 4962:Glossary of cue sports terms 4956:Process seems to be working. 4749:Smile at others by adding {{ 765:"I'm not willing to violate 5300:Larger discussion moved to 5254:Discussion never continued. 4875:status as soon as possible. 4497: 4342:Discussion never continued. 3775:. I couldn't believe it. — 3325:to get the URL of a frame: 3151:Category:Temporal templates 1978:Sho' thang. Let's do it. — 5908: 5892:20:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 5875:19:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 5847: 5838:20:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 5821:03:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 5797: 5788:20:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 5771:01:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 5747: 5724:20:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 5708:07:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5692:07:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5654:06:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5622:06:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5592:06:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5568:06:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5538:06:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5513:06:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5484: 5461:06:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5452:06:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5424:06:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5411:06:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5395:06:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5385:05:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5360:05:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5343:05:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5321:04:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5289: 5280:02:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5263:00:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5243: 5234:02:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 5216:22:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 5192: 5178:00:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 5169:19:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 5148:18:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 5128: 5119:18:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 5099:18:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 5075: 5067:12:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 5039: 5028:11:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 5018:11:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 5009:11:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 4998:10:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 4981:09:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 4945: 4936:08:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4919:07:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4899: 4890:15:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 4813:08:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 4780: 4771:19:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4728:19:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4707: 4694:17:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4632:17:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4607:17:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4557:16:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4522: 4513:03:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4493:02:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4437: 4426:03:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 4417:02:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 4399:02:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 4378: 4369:17:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 4351:17:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 4331: 4310:00:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 4270:00:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 4237:23:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4206:23:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4170:23:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4145:22:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4113:22:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4099:22:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4072:21:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 4060:23:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 4044:23:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 4034:22:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 4012:22:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3988:21:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3953:21:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3929:21:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3912:21:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3854:21:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3830: 3817:02:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3800:01:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3787:00:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3756: 3719:00:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3703:23:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3694:23:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3677:21:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3667:Joseph L. Mankiewicz Films 3658:21:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3617:00:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3600:21:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3534: 3523:23:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3507:15:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3486:14:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3461: 3452:15:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3435:08:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3394: 3385:06:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3318:Hi Bigpad and SMcCandlish, 3313:22:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 3299:23:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3274:18:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3261:15:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3243:07:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3216: 3207:05:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3189:Category:Request templates 3168:04:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3131: 3120:12:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3103:12:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3071: 3058:19:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3031:09:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3013:Category:Pigment disorders 3003:09:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 2950: 2941:14:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2924:12:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2900: 2887:10:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 2874:09:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2853:09:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2823: 2814:09:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2791:18:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2771: 2758:11:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2738:23:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2721:17:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2696: 2685:02:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2671:23:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2653:16:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2624: 2615:23:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2551: 2542:12:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2524:12:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2504: 2487:01:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2470:01:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2460:00:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2443:00:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2429:23:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2406:23:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2381: 2372:08:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2317:02:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2286: 2277:20:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2257:20:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2210:20:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2170: 2159:13:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 2111: 2016: 1904:Hey! There's no rush. The 1808: 1752: 1720: 1666: 1545: 1471: 1217: 1155: 988: 922: 748: 707:Self-resolving commentary. 696: 479:Self-resolving commentary. 468: 394: 280: 235:Self-resolving commentary. 224: 184:23:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 168:22:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 155:21:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 138:21:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 114: 5552:Knowledge (XXG):Fromowner 5481:Knowledge (XXG):Fromowner 5366:Knowledge (XXG):Fromowner 4830:of greatness rather than 3157:should be moved into it? 3067:Commons:Category:Albinism 2974: 2751:Image:Chinese snooker.svg 2223: 2146:22:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 2100:03:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 2084:03:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 2064:03:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 2045:02:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1999:03:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1990:03:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1974:03:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1957:02:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1937:02:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1921:02:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1899:02:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1883:02:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1867:02:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1851:02:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1836:01:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1796:23:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1779:17:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1744:04:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1711:04:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1690:02:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1653:22:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1629:12:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1602:00:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1582:00:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1536:12:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1518:12:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1430:01:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1417:03:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1401:03:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1389:00:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1371:23:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1350:20:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1328:12:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1305:01:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1289:01:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1280:00:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1271:00:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1254:00:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1205:10:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1188:10:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1142:23:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1121:15:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1101:00:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1034:09:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1009:09:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 909:23:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 890:22:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 880:22:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 870:20:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 848:16:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 814:15:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 796:15:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 739:12:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 722:11:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 687:11:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 659:11:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 615:10:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 591:08:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 575:08:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 554:08:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 529:08:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 515:08:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 493:08:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 457:10:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 447:08:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 430:15:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 381:21:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 355:21:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 340:20:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 318:10:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 271:07:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 254:03:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 209:07:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 193:03:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 5868:the community discussion 5495:Discussion moved to MfD. 5312:states that that image " 3545:Discussion has moved to 3181:Category:To do templates 3019:and related articles? — 979:04:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 962:08:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 5222:Shamrock it is then. — 4777:Steve Davis/Jimmy White 4161:One of the editors did 4027:User:Padraig3uk/Sandbox 2929:I'll go take a look. — 2714:(unfinished WIP render) 1906:nomination instructions 1214:Jeff Defender sock case 933:to mutual satisfaction. 625:I think top-posting is 5050:Self-resolving notice. 4737: 4471: 3900:. Hope that helps. — 3642:PPS: Restored that to 3015:stuff, or the work on 197:Only when I'm lazy. — 5758:Discussion is at MfD. 5207:Please do not ignore 5153:Thanks. :-) Are you 4736: 4652:Hilter Had Two Brains 4622:comment was added by 4547:comment was added by 4455: 4025:This is a rough idea 2435:no true ATT supporter 277:Jessica Steen article 42:of past discussions. 18:User talk:SMcCandlish 5808:Discussion is at CfD 5139:Self-resolving chat. 4083:is doomed, but that 4029:what do you think.-- 3859:Just something like 3841:Discussion moved to 3767:Self-resolving chat. 3142:Just plain resolved. 3096:de:Siamesenkaninchen 2707:Self-resolving chat. 2515:Self-resolving chat. 2392:Self-resolving chat. 2297:Self-resolving chat. 2122:Just plain resolved. 1873:Hmm, any questions? 1763:Self-resolving chat. 1616:Jeffrey O. Gustafson 1569:Jeffrey O. Gustafson 999:Just plain resolved. 423:open-source software 125:Self-resolving chat. 5608:Excellent, done... 5286:Liam Neeson article 5157:from last night? — 3476:list item for this. 3405:Simple explanation. 2747:Just about finished 2013:RfA complicatedness 4942:Cuegloss "process" 4738: 4472: 3555:Skippy (1931 film) 3420:I'm My Own Grandpa 3092:de:Marderkaninchen 2978:The E=mc² Barnstar 2352:The Color of Money 1610:I try not to make 1170:You're invited to 5436:), it's simply a 5155:User:88.104.21.47 4896:Stub tags spacing 4660:assume good faith 4635: 4560: 3413:from Matrona, it 3323:Internet Explorer 3149:I see a category 3008: 3007: 2683: 2659:here to fight. — 2651: 2589: 2262: 2261: 2128:user:cherhillsnow 868: 720: 621: 391:Inkscape template 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5899: 5890: 5887: 5886: 5859: 5853: 5852: 5836: 5833: 5832: 5809: 5803: 5802: 5786: 5783: 5782: 5759: 5753: 5752: 5722: 5719: 5718: 5706: 5703: 5702: 5690: 5652: 5649: 5648: 5620: 5590: 5587: 5586: 5580:Works for me. — 5566: 5536: 5533: 5532: 5511: 5496: 5490: 5489: 5450: 5447: 5446: 5409: 5406: 5405: 5383: 5380: 5379: 5341: 5338: 5337: 5305: 5295: 5294: 5278: 5275: 5274: 5255: 5249: 5248: 5232: 5229: 5228: 5204: 5198: 5197: 5167: 5164: 5163: 5140: 5134: 5133: 5117: 5114: 5113: 5091: 5081: 5080: 5051: 5045: 5044: 4996: 4993: 4992: 4979: 4976: 4975: 4957: 4951: 4950: 4934: 4931: 4930: 4911: 4905: 4904: 4888: 4885: 4884: 4864:Featured Article 4800: 4786: 4785: 4769: 4766: 4765: 4719: 4713: 4712: 4692: 4689: 4688: 4617: 4616:popular sports. 4605: 4602: 4601: 4576:tens of millions 4542: 4534: 4528: 4527: 4511: 4508: 4507: 4489: 4486: 4483: 4467: 4464: 4461: 4449: 4443: 4442: 4415: 4412: 4411: 4390: 4384: 4383: 4367: 4364: 4363: 4343: 4337: 4336: 4308: 4305: 4304: 4261:I found it here 4204: 4201: 4200: 4143: 4140: 4139: 4097: 4094: 4093: 4058: 4055: 4054: 4010: 4007: 4006: 3978: 3972: 3951: 3948: 3947: 3910: 3907: 3906: 3899: 3893: 3868: 3862: 3846: 3836: 3835: 3815: 3812: 3811: 3785: 3782: 3781: 3768: 3762: 3761: 3717: 3714: 3713: 3692: 3689: 3688: 3671: 3665: 3656: 3653: 3652: 3637: 3634: 3633: 3615: 3612: 3611: 3598: 3595: 3594: 3550: 3540: 3539: 3521: 3518: 3517: 3505: 3502: 3501: 3477: 3467: 3466: 3450: 3447: 3446: 3406: 3400: 3399: 3297: 3294: 3293: 3259: 3256: 3255: 3228: 3222: 3221: 3205: 3202: 3201: 3146:Hi SMcCandlish, 3143: 3137: 3136: 3118: 3115: 3114: 3100:Kersti Nebelsiek 3083: 3077: 3076: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3029: 3026: 3025: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2972: 2965: 2964: 2962: 2956: 2955: 2939: 2936: 2935: 2912: 2906: 2905: 2872: 2869: 2868: 2835: 2829: 2828: 2812: 2809: 2808: 2783: 2777: 2776: 2736: 2733: 2732: 2708: 2702: 2701: 2679: 2669: 2666: 2665: 2647: 2636: 2630: 2629: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2602: 2596: 2579: 2563: 2557: 2556: 2540: 2537: 2536: 2516: 2510: 2509: 2485: 2482: 2481: 2458: 2455: 2454: 2427: 2424: 2423: 2393: 2387: 2386: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2346:, dammit) eh... 2337: 2331: 2311: 2305: 2298: 2292: 2291: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2255: 2248: 2221: 2214: 2213: 2208: 2201: 2182: 2176: 2175: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2123: 2117: 2116: 2098: 2095: 2094: 2062: 2059: 2058: 2028: 2022: 2021: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1820: 1814: 1813: 1794: 1791: 1790: 1764: 1758: 1757: 1732: 1726: 1725: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1678: 1672: 1671: 1651: 1648: 1647: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1561: 1551: 1550: 1534: 1531: 1530: 1491:WikiProject Spam 1483: 1477: 1476: 1468:-- an invitation 1454: 1451: 1450: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1367: 1363: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1324: 1320: 1303: 1300: 1299: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1242: 1223: 1222: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1167: 1161: 1160: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1077: 1069: 1061: 1053: 1047: 1041: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1019: 1000: 994: 993: 973: 958: 956: 954: 952: 950: 934: 928: 927: 907: 904: 903: 864: 844: 842: 840: 838: 836: 812: 809: 808: 792: 790: 788: 786: 784: 760: 754: 753: 737: 734: 733: 719: 708: 702: 701: 685: 682: 681: 657: 654: 653: 636:User:SMcCandlish 617: 589: 586: 585: 552: 549: 548: 513: 510: 509: 480: 474: 473: 445: 442: 441: 406: 400: 399: 379: 376: 375: 368: 362: 345:appropriately.-- 338: 335: 334: 292: 286: 285: 269: 266: 265: 236: 230: 229: 207: 204: 203: 182: 179: 178: 153: 150: 149: 126: 120: 119: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5907: 5906: 5902: 5901: 5900: 5898: 5897: 5896: 5888: 5882: 5881: 5860: 5857: 5855: 5850: 5846: 5834: 5828: 5827: 5810: 5807: 5805: 5800: 5796: 5794:User categories 5784: 5778: 5777: 5760: 5757: 5755: 5750: 5746: 5720: 5714: 5713: 5704: 5698: 5697: 5679: 5650: 5644: 5643: 5609: 5588: 5582: 5581: 5555: 5534: 5528: 5527: 5500: 5497: 5494: 5492: 5487: 5483: 5448: 5442: 5441: 5407: 5401: 5400: 5381: 5375: 5374: 5339: 5333: 5332: 5306: 5299: 5297: 5292: 5288: 5276: 5270: 5269: 5256: 5253: 5251: 5246: 5242: 5230: 5224: 5223: 5205: 5202: 5200: 5195: 5191: 5188:Trevor Ringland 5165: 5159: 5158: 5141: 5138: 5136: 5131: 5127: 5115: 5109: 5108: 5092: 5085: 5083: 5078: 5074: 5052: 5049: 5047: 5042: 5038: 5025:Fuhghettaboutit 4994: 4988: 4987: 4977: 4971: 4970: 4958: 4955: 4953: 4948: 4944: 4932: 4926: 4925: 4912: 4909: 4907: 4902: 4898: 4886: 4880: 4879: 4824:"peacock terms" 4801: 4790: 4788: 4783: 4779: 4767: 4761: 4760: 4755: 4720: 4717: 4715: 4710: 4706: 4690: 4684: 4683: 4618:—The preceding 4603: 4597: 4596: 4543:—The preceding 4535: 4532: 4530: 4525: 4521: 4509: 4503: 4502: 4487: 4484: 4481: 4465: 4462: 4459: 4450: 4448:Self-resolving. 4447: 4445: 4440: 4436: 4413: 4407: 4406: 4391: 4388: 4386: 4381: 4377: 4365: 4359: 4358: 4344: 4341: 4339: 4334: 4330: 4306: 4300: 4299: 4202: 4196: 4195: 4141: 4135: 4134: 4095: 4089: 4088: 4056: 4050: 4049: 4008: 4002: 4001: 3976: 3970: 3949: 3943: 3942: 3908: 3902: 3901: 3897: 3891: 3866: 3860: 3847: 3840: 3838: 3833: 3829: 3813: 3807: 3806: 3797:Fuhghettaboutit 3783: 3777: 3776: 3769: 3766: 3764: 3759: 3755: 3715: 3709: 3708: 3707:No worries. — 3700:Fuhghettaboutit 3690: 3684: 3683: 3674:Fuhghettaboutit 3669: 3663: 3654: 3648: 3647: 3635: 3629: 3628: 3613: 3607: 3606: 3596: 3590: 3589: 3551: 3544: 3542: 3537: 3533: 3519: 3513: 3512: 3503: 3497: 3496: 3491:I'll add it to 3478: 3471: 3469: 3464: 3460: 3448: 3442: 3441: 3407: 3404: 3402: 3397: 3393: 3295: 3289: 3288: 3257: 3251: 3250: 3229: 3226: 3224: 3219: 3215: 3203: 3197: 3196: 3153:. Do you think 3144: 3141: 3139: 3134: 3130: 3116: 3110: 3109: 3098:has two copys. 3084: 3081: 3079: 3074: 3070: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3027: 3021: 3020: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2963: 2961:Self-resolving. 2960: 2958: 2953: 2949: 2937: 2931: 2930: 2913: 2910: 2908: 2903: 2899: 2870: 2864: 2863: 2836: 2833: 2831: 2826: 2822: 2820:User categories 2810: 2804: 2803: 2784: 2781: 2779: 2774: 2770: 2734: 2728: 2727: 2709: 2706: 2704: 2699: 2695: 2677:Septentrionalis 2667: 2661: 2660: 2645:Septentrionalis 2637: 2634: 2632: 2627: 2623: 2611: 2605: 2604: 2600: 2594: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2554: 2550: 2538: 2532: 2531: 2517: 2514: 2512: 2507: 2503: 2483: 2477: 2476: 2456: 2450: 2449: 2425: 2419: 2418: 2394: 2391: 2389: 2384: 2380: 2368: 2362: 2361: 2335: 2329: 2314:Fuhghettaboutit 2309: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2294: 2289: 2285: 2273: 2267: 2266: 2254: 2244: 2242: 2207: 2197: 2195: 2183: 2181:Self-resolving. 2180: 2178: 2173: 2169: 2142: 2136: 2135: 2124: 2121: 2119: 2114: 2110: 2096: 2090: 2089: 2060: 2054: 2053: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2019: 2015: 1996:Fuhghettaboutit 1986: 1980: 1979: 1971:Fuhghettaboutit 1953: 1947: 1946: 1918:Fuhghettaboutit 1821: 1818: 1816: 1811: 1807: 1792: 1786: 1785: 1765: 1762: 1760: 1755: 1751: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1723: 1719: 1707: 1701: 1700: 1687:Fuhghettaboutit 1679: 1676: 1674: 1669: 1665: 1649: 1643: 1642: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1562: 1555: 1553: 1548: 1544: 1532: 1526: 1525: 1484: 1481: 1479: 1474: 1470: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1413: 1407: 1406: 1385: 1379: 1378: 1365: 1361: 1346: 1340: 1339: 1322: 1318: 1301: 1295: 1294: 1267: 1261: 1260: 1243: 1227: 1225: 1220: 1216: 1201: 1195: 1194: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1158: 1154: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1097: 1091: 1090: 1079: 1071: 1063: 1055: 1045: 1039: 1030: 1024: 1023: 1021: 1001: 998: 996: 991: 987: 969: 948: 946: 944: 942: 940: 935: 932: 930: 925: 921: 905: 899: 898: 862:Septentrionalis 834: 832: 830: 828: 826: 810: 804: 803: 782: 780: 778: 776: 774: 761: 758: 756: 751: 747: 735: 729: 728: 709: 706: 704: 699: 695: 683: 677: 676: 655: 649: 648: 587: 581: 580: 550: 544: 543: 511: 505: 504: 481: 478: 476: 471: 467: 443: 437: 436: 407: 404: 402: 397: 393: 377: 371: 370: 366: 360: 336: 330: 329: 293: 290: 288: 283: 279: 267: 261: 260: 251:Fuhghettaboutit 237: 234: 232: 227: 223: 205: 199: 198: 180: 174: 173: 151: 145: 144: 127: 124: 122: 117: 113: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5905: 5903: 5895: 5894: 5848: 5845: 5842: 5841: 5840: 5798: 5795: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5748: 5745: 5740: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5736: 5735: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5710: 5665: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5661: 5660: 5659: 5658: 5657: 5656: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5573: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5541: 5540: 5485: 5482: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5476: 5475: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5463: 5290: 5287: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5244: 5241: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5193: 5190: 5186:Your edits to 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5129: 5126: 5123: 5122: 5121: 5076: 5073: 5072:Double-spacing 5070: 5040: 5037: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5011: 4946: 4943: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4916:Colonies Chris 4900: 4897: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4876: 4860:Walter Lindrum 4852: 4835: 4820:"weasel words" 4781: 4778: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4748: 4731: 4708: 4705: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4680: 4673: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4624:212.139.20.252 4610: 4609: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4571: 4570: 4549:212.139.20.252 4523: 4520: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4438: 4435: 4432: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4379: 4376: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4332: 4329: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4102: 4101: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3915: 3914: 3831: 3828: 3827:Template abuse 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3757: 3754: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3639: 3638: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3535: 3532: 3531:Stub templates 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3462: 3459: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3395: 3392: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3351: 3348: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3319: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3264: 3263: 3227:Problem fixed. 3217: 3214: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3193: 3177: 3132: 3129: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3072: 3069: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3034: 3033: 3006: 3005: 2981: 2980: 2975: 2973: 2951: 2948: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2901: 2898: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2824: 2821: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2772: 2769: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2741: 2740: 2697: 2694: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2625: 2622: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2568:WPILT logo.png 2552: 2549: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2505: 2502: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2382: 2379: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2287: 2284: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2260: 2259: 2250: 2230: 2229: 2224: 2222: 2203: 2171: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2149: 2148: 2112: 2109: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1940: 1939: 1914: 1913: 1902: 1901: 1886: 1885: 1870: 1869: 1854: 1853: 1809: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1799: 1798: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1605: 1604: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1472: 1469: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1208: 1207: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1104: 1103: 1086:average reader 1081: 1073: 1065: 1057: 1049: 1036: 1015: 989: 986: 983: 982: 981: 923: 920: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 894: 893: 892: 882: 749: 746: 745:3RR cavassing? 743: 742: 741: 697: 694: 691: 690: 689: 673:in that thread 661: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 579:Okey-dokey. — 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 469: 466: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 395: 392: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 281: 278: 275: 274: 273: 246:Semih Sayginer 225: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 211: 161:French spacing 115: 112: 109: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5904: 5893: 5885: 5879: 5878: 5877: 5876: 5873: 5869: 5865: 5843: 5839: 5831: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5822: 5819: 5815: 5793: 5789: 5781: 5775: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5769: 5765: 5744: 5741: 5725: 5717: 5711: 5709: 5701: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5689: 5688: 5684: 5683: 5677: 5676: 5675: 5674: 5673: 5672: 5671: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5655: 5647: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5623: 5619: 5618: 5614: 5613: 5607: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5593: 5585: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5569: 5565: 5564: 5560: 5559: 5553: 5549: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5539: 5531: 5525: 5521: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5510: 5509: 5505: 5504: 5480: 5462: 5459: 5458:70.17.153.232 5455: 5454: 5453: 5445: 5439: 5435: 5431: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5422: 5421:70.17.153.232 5418: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5404: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5393: 5392:70.17.153.232 5388: 5387: 5386: 5378: 5372: 5367: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5358: 5357:70.17.153.232 5354: 5350: 5346: 5345: 5344: 5336: 5330: 5325: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5319: 5318:70.17.153.232 5315: 5311: 5303: 5285: 5281: 5273: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5261: 5239: 5235: 5227: 5220: 5219: 5218: 5217: 5214: 5210: 5189: 5185: 5179: 5176: 5175:88.104.86.114 5172: 5171: 5170: 5162: 5156: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5149: 5146: 5124: 5120: 5112: 5106: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5097: 5089: 5071: 5069: 5068: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5035: 5029: 5026: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5016: 5012: 5010: 5007: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4991: 4983: 4982: 4974: 4967: 4963: 4941: 4937: 4929: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4920: 4917: 4895: 4891: 4883: 4877: 4874: 4869: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4841: 4836: 4833: 4832:demonstration 4829: 4825: 4821: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4811: 4805: 4798: 4794: 4776: 4772: 4764: 4757: 4756: 4754: 4752: 4746: 4742: 4735: 4730: 4729: 4726: 4704:Jeff Defender 4703: 4695: 4687: 4681: 4678: 4674: 4670: 4666: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4649: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4608: 4600: 4594: 4593:the talk page 4590: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4577: 4573: 4572: 4568: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4558: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4539: 4518: 4514: 4506: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4495: 4494: 4491: 4490: 4477: 4469: 4468: 4454: 4433: 4427: 4424: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4410: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4397: 4374: 4370: 4362: 4357:like that. — 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4349: 4327: 4311: 4303: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4271: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4238: 4235: 4231: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4207: 4199: 4193: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4171: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4146: 4138: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4114: 4111: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4100: 4092: 4086: 4082: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4070: 4061: 4053: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4042: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4032: 4028: 4013: 4005: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3986: 3982: 3975: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3954: 3946: 3940: 3936: 3935:documentation 3932: 3931: 3930: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3913: 3905: 3896: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3872:documentation 3865: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3852: 3844: 3826: 3818: 3810: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3798: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3780: 3774: 3753:WPBA NC event 3752: 3747: 3744: 3740: 3739: 3736: 3730: 3720: 3712: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3701: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3687: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3675: 3668: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3651: 3645: 3641: 3640: 3632: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3610: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3593: 3586: 3581: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3572: 3569: 3565: 3564: 3561: 3556: 3548: 3530: 3524: 3516: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3500: 3494: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3484: 3475: 3457: 3453: 3445: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3433: 3430: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3416: 3412: 3390: 3386: 3383: 3379: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3365: 3360: 3359: 3357: 3352: 3349: 3346: 3343:A properties 3342: 3341: 3339: 3334: 3330: 3329: 3327: 3326: 3324: 3320: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3311: 3300: 3292: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3275: 3272: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3262: 3254: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3241: 3236: 3232: 3212: 3208: 3200: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3176: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3166: 3161: 3158: 3156: 3152: 3147: 3128: 3125: 3121: 3113: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3088:Siamese (cat) 3068: 3065: 3059: 3056: 3048: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3032: 3024: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3004: 3001: 2993: 2987: 2983: 2982: 2979: 2976: 2971: 2966: 2946: 2942: 2934: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2922: 2918: 2897: 2894: 2888: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2867: 2861: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2851: 2846: 2842: 2819: 2815: 2807: 2800: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2789: 2768: 2765: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2739: 2731: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2719: 2715: 2692: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2664: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2620: 2616: 2608: 2599: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2587: 2583: 2577: 2576:inline styles 2573: 2569: 2547: 2543: 2535: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2522: 2500: 2488: 2480: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2453: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2441: 2436: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2422: 2415: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2404: 2400: 2378:About control 2377: 2373: 2365: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2334: 2326: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2315: 2308: 2282: 2278: 2270: 2264: 2263: 2258: 2253: 2249: 2247: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2228: 2225: 2220: 2215: 2212: 2211: 2206: 2202: 2200: 2193: 2188: 2166: 2160: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2139: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2129: 2107: 2101: 2093: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2057: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2012: 2000: 1997: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1983: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1958: 1950: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1919: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1907: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1804: 1802: 1797: 1789: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1777: 1772: 1770: 1748: 1746: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1716: 1712: 1704: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1662: 1654: 1646: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1630: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1595: 1589: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1570: 1566: 1559: 1537: 1529: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1509: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1492: 1487: 1467: 1464: 1449: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1427:Jeff Defender 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1410: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1399: 1398:Jeff Defender 1394: 1390: 1382: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1358: 1355: 1351: 1343: 1337: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1314: 1306: 1298: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1264: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1240: 1237: 1234: 1230: 1229:Jeff Defender 1213: 1211: 1206: 1198: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1152:An invitation 1151: 1143: 1135: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1094: 1087: 1082: 1078: 1070: 1062: 1054: 1044: 1037: 1035: 1027: 1020: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1007: 984: 980: 977: 974: 972: 966: 965: 964: 963: 960: 959: 918: 910: 902: 895: 891: 888: 883: 881: 878: 873: 872: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 850: 849: 846: 845: 821: 817: 816: 815: 807: 800: 799: 798: 797: 794: 793: 770: 768: 744: 740: 732: 726: 725: 724: 723: 718: 717:Seraphimblade 714: 692: 688: 680: 674: 670: 666: 662: 660: 652: 645: 641: 637: 633: 628: 624: 623: 622: 620: 616: 613: 608: 605: 592: 584: 578: 577: 576: 573: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 555: 547: 540: 536: 532: 531: 530: 527: 523: 518: 517: 516: 508: 502: 497: 496: 495: 494: 491: 486: 464: 458: 455: 450: 449: 448: 440: 434: 433: 432: 431: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 390: 382: 374: 365: 364:toomuchtrivia 358: 357: 356: 352: 348: 343: 342: 341: 333: 326: 322: 321: 320: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 276: 272: 264: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 247: 242: 220: 210: 202: 196: 195: 194: 191: 187: 186: 185: 177: 171: 170: 169: 166: 162: 159: 158: 157: 156: 148: 140: 139: 136: 132: 110: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5861: 5811: 5761: 5686: 5681: 5616: 5611: 5562: 5557: 5507: 5502: 5498: 5313: 5307: 5257: 5206: 5145:88.104.4.186 5142: 5104: 5093: 5053: 4984: 4959: 4913: 4910:Wrong venue. 4873:Good Article 4856:Irving Crane 4847: 4843: 4839: 4831: 4827: 4806: 4802: 4739: 4721: 4668: 4665:disruptively 4651: 4575: 4566: 4540: 4536: 4496: 4479: 4473: 4457: 4392: 4345: 4066: 4024: 3939:Template:NIR 3883: 3848: 3772: 3770: 3733: 3558: 3552: 3479: 3426: 3414: 3410: 3408: 3307: 3237: 3233: 3230: 3213:Alex Higgins 3174: 3162: 3159: 3148: 3145: 3085: 2986:pigmentation 2977: 2914: 2859: 2837: 2798: 2785: 2710: 2638: 2572:WPILT banner 2565: 2562:Makes sense. 2518: 2413: 2395: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2344:Godwin's law 2339: 2324: 2300: 2245: 2226: 2198: 2184: 2156:Cherhillsnow 2125: 2071: 2030: 1915: 1903: 1822: 1800: 1773: 1766: 1749:Arch Stanton 1734: 1680: 1677:Just an FYI. 1619: 1572: 1563: 1510: 1495: 1488: 1485: 1369: 1360: 1335: 1326: 1317: 1244: 1235: 1209: 1172:criticise me 1169: 1114: 1085: 1002: 985:Snooker rest 975: 968: 939: 936: 919:AAJ and such 858:Queegishness 853: 825: 819: 773: 764: 762: 712: 710: 693:A cup of tea 672: 668: 664: 643: 639: 631: 626: 618: 609: 606: 603: 538: 534: 521: 500: 484: 482: 408: 324: 294: 240: 238: 141: 128: 78: 43: 37: 5884:SMcCandlish 5830:SMcCandlish 5816:i started. 5780:SMcCandlish 5768:John Carter 5716:SMcCandlish 5700:SMcCandlish 5646:SMcCandlish 5584:SMcCandlish 5530:SMcCandlish 5444:SMcCandlish 5403:SMcCandlish 5377:SMcCandlish 5335:SMcCandlish 5272:SMcCandlish 5226:SMcCandlish 5161:SMcCandlish 5111:SMcCandlish 4990:SMcCandlish 4973:SMcCandlish 4928:SMcCandlish 4882:SMcCandlish 4844:demonstrate 4804:with this? 4763:SMcCandlish 4751:subst:Smile 4686:SMcCandlish 4599:SMcCandlish 4505:SMcCandlish 4409:SMcCandlish 4361:SMcCandlish 4328:Re: Snooker 4302:SMcCandlish 4198:SMcCandlish 4137:SMcCandlish 4091:SMcCandlish 4052:SMcCandlish 4004:SMcCandlish 3945:SMcCandlish 3904:SMcCandlish 3809:SMcCandlish 3779:SMcCandlish 3711:SMcCandlish 3686:SMcCandlish 3650:SMcCandlish 3631:SMcCandlish 3609:SMcCandlish 3592:SMcCandlish 3515:SMcCandlish 3499:SMcCandlish 3444:SMcCandlish 3422:). Cheers, 3291:SMcCandlish 3253:SMcCandlish 3199:SMcCandlish 3112:SMcCandlish 3023:SMcCandlish 2933:SMcCandlish 2866:SMcCandlish 2806:SMcCandlish 2730:SMcCandlish 2663:SMcCandlish 2607:SMcCandlish 2586:Pathoschild 2534:SMcCandlish 2479:SMcCandlish 2452:SMcCandlish 2421:SMcCandlish 2364:SMcCandlish 2269:SMcCandlish 2235:SMcCandlish 2233:Awarded to 2138:SMcCandlish 2092:SMcCandlish 2056:SMcCandlish 1982:SMcCandlish 1949:SMcCandlish 1788:SMcCandlish 1776:ArchStanton 1703:SMcCandlish 1645:SMcCandlish 1594:SMcCandlish 1560:each other. 1556:I think we 1528:SMcCandlish 1448:SMcCandlish 1409:SMcCandlish 1381:SMcCandlish 1342:SMcCandlish 1297:SMcCandlish 1263:SMcCandlish 1197:SMcCandlish 1134:SMcCandlish 1093:SMcCandlish 1064:type)" or " 1026:SMcCandlish 971:SMcCandlish 901:SMcCandlish 806:SMcCandlish 731:SMcCandlish 679:SMcCandlish 651:SMcCandlish 612:Kim Bruning 583:SMcCandlish 546:SMcCandlish 507:SMcCandlish 454:Kim Bruning 439:SMcCandlish 373:SMcCandlish 332:SMcCandlish 300:, explains 263:SMcCandlish 201:SMcCandlish 176:SMcCandlish 147:SMcCandlish 129:Thanks for 36:This is an 4791:Explained 4434:Great idea 4267:padraig3uk 4234:padraig3uk 4167:padraig3uk 4110:padraig3uk 4069:padraig3uk 4041:padraig3uk 4031:padraig3uk 3985:padraig3uk 3926:padraig3uk 3851:padraig3uk 3738:Farmbrough 3563:Farmbrough 3493:WP:CUETODO 3483:Sandman30s 3474:WP:CUETODO 3345:dialog box 3333:popup menu 2947:Good work! 2681:PMAnderson 2649:PMAnderson 2598:User WPILT 2548:WPILT logo 2033:edit stats 1626:<*: --> 1579:<*: --> 1506:Requestion 1437:disruption 1166:I Decline. 887:Coppertwig 877:Coppertwig 866:PMAnderson 106:April 2007 98:Archive 10 5872:zadignose 5814:this UCFD 5364:I have. 5213:Weejack48 5064:Spellcast 4868:Joe Davis 4828:assertion 4423:Sn0wflake 4396:Sn0wflake 4131:WP:ARBCOM 3773:this year 3743:22 April 3568:21 April 3511:Added. — 3382:Kevinkor2 3380:Enjoy! -- 3371:clipboard 3231:Stanton, 3192:inliners. 3165:Kevinkor2 2782:I joined. 2501:Thank You 2348:obsessive 2302:creating 2167:Thank you 2108:Vandalism 1908:provide: 1612:WP:POINTs 1498:talk page 669:work down 539:seriously 90:Archive 7 85:Archive 6 79:Archive 5 73:Archive 4 68:Archive 3 60:Archive 1 5880:Done. — 5854:Resolved 5826:Done. — 5818:VegaDark 5804:Resolved 5776:Done. — 5754:Resolved 5712:Done. — 5491:Resolved 5438:WP:ESSAY 5304:and MfD. 5296:Resolved 5250:Resolved 5199:Resolved 5135:Resolved 5082:Resolved 5046:Resolved 5036:Re: Huh? 4952:Resolved 4906:Resolved 4840:indicate 4787:Resolved 4745:WikiLove 4714:Resolved 4677:unsigned 4620:unsigned 4545:unsigned 4529:Resolved 4444:Resolved 4385:Resolved 4338:Resolved 3837:Resolved 3763:Resolved 3741:, 06:58 3566:, 20:51 3541:Resolved 3468:Resolved 3401:Resolved 3347:appears. 3335:appears. 3223:Resolved 3138:Resolved 3078:Resolved 3046:Rockpock 3041:albinism 3017:Albinism 2991:Rockpock 2957:Resolved 2907:Resolved 2884:VegaDark 2850:VegaDark 2830:Resolved 2799:al dente 2778:Resolved 2703:Resolved 2631:Resolved 2558:Resolved 2511:Resolved 2388:Resolved 2293:Resolved 2177:Resolved 2118:Resolved 2023:Resolved 1826:Thanks. 1815:Resolved 1759:Resolved 1727:Resolved 1673:Resolved 1663:ATT post 1621:Shazaam! 1588:WP:POINT 1574:Shazaam! 1552:Resolved 1478:Resolved 1239:contribs 1224:Resolved 1184:contribs 1162:Resolved 1043:Cuegloss 995:Resolved 929:Resolved 755:Resolved 703:Resolved 475:Resolved 415:Inkscape 401:Resolved 287:Resolved 231:Resolved 121:Resolved 5889:‹(-¿-)› 5835:‹(-¿-)› 5785:‹(-¿-)› 5721:‹(-¿-)› 5705:‹(-¿-)› 5651:‹(-¿-)› 5589:‹(-¿-)› 5535:‹(-¿-)› 5520:WP:SELF 5449:‹(-¿-)› 5408:‹(-¿-)› 5382:‹(-¿-)› 5340:‹(-¿-)› 5329:WP:SELF 5277:‹(-¿-)› 5231:‹(-¿-)› 5166:‹(-¿-)› 5116:‹(-¿-)› 5088:WT:STUB 5060:WP:RFCN 4995:‹(-¿-)› 4978:‹(-¿-)› 4933:‹(-¿-)› 4887:‹(-¿-)› 4799:better. 4768:‹(-¿-)› 4691:‹(-¿-)› 4604:‹(-¿-)› 4510:‹(-¿-)› 4414:‹(-¿-)› 4366:‹(-¿-)› 4307:‹(-¿-)› 4203:‹(-¿-)› 4142:‹(-¿-)› 4096:‹(-¿-)› 4057:‹(-¿-)› 4009:‹(-¿-)› 3974:Warning 3950:‹(-¿-)› 3922:be bold 3909:‹(-¿-)› 3880:be bold 3864:Warning 3814:‹(-¿-)› 3784:‹(-¿-)› 3716:‹(-¿-)› 3691:‹(-¿-)› 3655:‹(-¿-)› 3644:WP:STUB 3636:‹(-¿-)› 3625:WP:STUB 3614:‹(-¿-)› 3597:‹(-¿-)› 3580:WP:STUB 3573:(GMT). 3547:WT:STUB 3520:‹(-¿-)› 3504:‹(-¿-)› 3449:‹(-¿-)› 3391:Matrona 3296:‹(-¿-)› 3258:‹(-¿-)› 3204:‹(-¿-)› 3117:‹(-¿-)› 3028:‹(-¿-)› 2938:‹(-¿-)› 2921:Dweller 2871:‹(-¿-)› 2860:totally 2811:‹(-¿-)› 2755:SFC9394 2735:‹(-¿-)› 2718:SFC9394 2668:‹(-¿-)› 2612:‹(-¿-)› 2539:‹(-¿-)› 2484:‹(-¿-)› 2457:‹(-¿-)› 2426:‹(-¿-)› 2360:;-) — 2356:totally 2283:Holy... 2072:another 1176:KNcyu38 976:‹(-¿-)› 572:Rednblu 526:Rednblu 490:Rednblu 39:archive 5687:scribe 5617:scribe 5563:scribe 5508:scribe 5430:WP:NPA 5371:WP:MFD 4966:WP:OWN 4810:bigpad 4163:WP:RFC 4127:WP:RFC 3748:(GMT). 3585:WP:WSS 3472:Added 3411:derive 3310:bigpad 3271:bigpad 3240:bigpad 2693:Re:RMB 2521:Nick C 2467:Merzul 2440:Merzul 2403:Merzul 2246:—dgies 2199:—dgies 2192:WP:SSP 2187:my RfA 1697:WT:ATT 1118:bigpad 1006:bigpad 820:sounds 767:WP:3RR 713:factor 644:inside 627:vastly 501:at all 163::-) ~ 5056:Klp88 4848:state 4797:WP:RS 4741:Wooyi 4725:Wooyi 4672:well. 4648:WP:RS 4567:never 4476:given 2911:Done. 2788:Chris 2582:admin 2570:in {{ 2325:truly 2076:Xiner 2037:Xiner 1929:Xiner 1891:Xiner 1875:Xiner 1859:Xiner 1843:Xiner 1828:Xiner 1741:Wooyi 1513:A. B. 1441:WP:AN 1366:Train 1323:Train 1286:Wooyi 1277:Wooyi 1251:Wooyi 1076:cross 1060:cross 941:: --> 827:: --> 775:: --> 665:start 632:every 485:first 131:these 16:< 5434:WP:N 5260:Tony 5107:. — 5096:Alai 5015:Kris 5006:Kris 4858:and 4793:WP:V 4628:talk 4553:talk 4488:cιτγ 4466:cιτγ 4375:Stub 3941:. — 3746:2007 3735:Rich 3646:. — 3571:2007 3560:Rich 3495:. — 3428:1968 3424:Q·L· 2880:this 2641:here 2603:. — 2412:the 2399:here 2340:nazi 2080:talk 2041:talk 1933:talk 1895:talk 1879:talk 1863:talk 1847:talk 1832:talk 1699:. — 1558:grok 1504:and 1502:Hu12 1336:real 1233:talk 1180:talk 1068:rest 1052:rest 1018:Rest 957:< 843:< 791:< 503:. — 419:free 351:talk 314:talk 304:and 241:ever 190:UBeR 165:UBeR 135:UBeR 5682:WjB 5612:WjB 5558:WjB 5503:WjB 4669:all 4656:PoV 4482:Λυδ 4460:Λυδ 4456:I, 4348:Buc 3895:NIR 3884:say 3183:to 2621:ATT 2414:new 2359:--> 2239:RfA 1489:At 1174:. — 854:are 535:top 522:top 417:is 347:Vbd 325:has 310:Vbd 306:how 302:why 111:Hi! 5856:– 5806:– 5756:– 5493:– 5298:– 5252:– 5201:– 5137:– 5084:– 5062:. 5048:– 4954:– 4908:– 4878:— 4826:: 4795:, 4789:– 4716:– 4682:— 4630:) 4555:) 4531:– 4446:– 4387:– 4340:– 3977:}} 3971:{{ 3898:}} 3892:{{ 3867:}} 3861:{{ 3839:– 3765:– 3670:}} 3664:{{ 3557:? 3543:– 3470:– 3415:is 3403:– 3331:A 3225:– 3195:— 3163:-- 3140:– 3080:– 2988:. 2959:– 2909:– 2882:. 2832:– 2780:– 2705:– 2633:– 2601:}} 2595:{{ 2584:} 2560:– 2530:— 2513:– 2390:– 2336:}} 2333:rp 2330:{{ 2310:}} 2307:rp 2304:{{ 2295:– 2241:. 2179:– 2120:– 2082:) 2043:) 2025:– 1935:) 1897:) 1881:) 1865:) 1849:) 1834:) 1817:– 1761:– 1729:– 1675:– 1624:- 1618:- 1577:- 1571:- 1554:– 1480:– 1226:– 1186:) 1182:• 1164:– 1046:}} 1040:{{ 997:– 931:– 885:-- 757:– 705:– 640:so 610:-- 488:-- 477:– 427:Rl 413:: 403:– 367:}} 361:{{ 353:) 316:) 289:– 233:– 123:– 94:→ 64:← 5090:. 4634:. 4626:( 4559:. 4551:( 4485:α 4463:α 3845:. 3549:. 3432:☿ 3373:. 3054:t 3050:e 2999:t 2995:e 2580:{ 2369:ツ 2342:( 2274:ツ 2252:c 2205:c 2143:ツ 2097:ツ 2078:( 2061:ツ 2039:( 1987:ツ 1954:ツ 1931:( 1893:( 1877:( 1861:( 1845:( 1830:( 1793:ツ 1708:ツ 1650:ツ 1599:ツ 1533:ツ 1453:ツ 1414:ツ 1386:ツ 1362:A 1347:ツ 1319:A 1302:ツ 1268:ツ 1236:· 1231:( 1202:ツ 1178:( 1139:ツ 1098:ツ 1072:( 1056:( 1031:ツ 955:t 953:n 951:a 949:i 947:d 945:a 943:R 906:ツ 841:t 839:n 837:a 835:i 833:d 831:a 829:R 811:ツ 789:t 787:n 785:a 783:i 781:d 779:a 777:R 736:ツ 684:ツ 656:ツ 588:ツ 551:ツ 512:ツ 444:ツ 421:/ 378:ツ 349:( 337:ツ 312:( 268:ツ 206:ツ 181:ツ 152:ツ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index