Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:SSS108

Source 📝

372:
thought about the amount of time people spend on this page about editing, reverting and what not...And used to think that if the people over here click on the link www.thehungersite.com during that time or send that link to other people they know, more hungry people will get food. At the same time, till now, i haven't seen anything that would not lead me to a conclusion of not supporting what SSS108 has been doing. If everybody left this page thinking that its difficult to face the bickerings, onslaught of edits (covert and overt), then this page would certainly wouldn't have improved. This is more important when there has been "co-incidence" edits at many a point of time whenever there comes a report which is pro Sathya Sai. So while i would prefer to spend my time clicking on www.thehungersite.com, i would like to extend my support to SSS108 with the work he is doing. Mr Kazlev, so we can join up together to increase the number of clickings on www.thehungersite.com Hope you accept my invitation. "Mad"
143:"Harassment is sometimes described as a violation of don't disrupt Knowledge (XXG) to prove a point or no personal attacks, but is properly both a subset and special case of both, while at the same time being separate from both for definition reasons. The policy of "no personal attacks" is primarily about content, not behavior (for example, calling certain editors "assholes" is a violation of NPA, but is not in itself harassment), while the policy of "don't disrupt Knowledge (XXG) to prove a point" covers many less malicious behaviors that, while unacceptable, are not as bad as harassment (for example, disruption intended to support a cause). And yet, it is a subset of both, in that it is disruption to prove a point, and it is an attempt to personally attack another editor of Knowledge (XXG)." 1395: 157:
flaming (online verbal abuse and/or character defamation); leaving improper messages on message boards or in guest books; sending electronic viruses; sending unsolicited e-mail; tracing another person's computer and Internet activity, and electronic identity theft." Before you try to mirror this back at me, you chief tactic, I point out that I am NOT guilty of anything like this, hence - though would in character doubtless like to claim it of me, it is untrue! --
1239: 1910: 1864: 1174: 430:
Editors, please note how Moreno replies to a question with a derogatory diatribe and an assertion of "madness! Who is most obsessed with propaganda, Andries or Moreno, is as clear as day to those who read even a fraction of the endless Morenos' web pages and postings and the comparatively very few by
104:
Information in an article or on a talk page regarding Sathya Sai Baba or organizations affiliated with him which is poorly sourced may be removed. This includes links to websites which contain original research or which consist of personal accounts of experiences with Sathya Sai Baba or organizations
1057:
you have not provided the copyright information, so there is no danger "as such" that your violations of Knowledge (XXG) policies will result in legal jeopardy for Knowledge (XXG). This is just for your edification about uploading images to Knowledge (XXG) and how you can properly contribute images.
520:
We are not the ones who need to be careful as we do not break the laws on slander as Freelanceresearch has done on Yahoo groups sathyasaibaba2 endlessly... the same Lisa de Witt having even been banned from Knowledge (XXG) for that previously too! As usual, she makes big claims without anything that
146:
Stalking is a legal term for repeated harassment or other forms of invasion of a person's privacy in a manner that causes fear to its target. Statutes vary between jurisdiction but may include such acts as: repeated following; unwanted contact (by letter or other means of communication); observing
1077:
where anyone can link to them, take them and use them without your permission. Any more Knowledge (XXG) policies you want to flaunt around? Go right ahead. I find it very amusing. Of course, your ceaseless bickering on my userpage is probably due to the embarrassing full exposure I made against you
977:
it on your user page? The image in question belongs to me and is sourced online on my spiritual blog, and the copyrights were not released in any way into the public domain, so I'd like to ask why you are uploading images belonging to someone else (possible copyvio)? I also noticed that you haven't
556:
I wish to correct my former statement that Lisa de Witt was banned from Knowledge (XXG). I find I was misinformed by someone who commented thus, but - having checked thoroughly - I find no evidence of it. I am removing my unfortunate mistake. Interesting that Lisa de Witt admits that she and Moreno
139:
I remind you of some rules on Knowledge (XXG): Harassment is defined as a pattern of disruptive behavior that appears to a reasonable and objective observer to have the purpose of causing negative emotions in a targeted person or persons, usually (but not always) for the purpose of intimidating the
371:
Hii Mr Kazlev, This is the anonymous poster. Hope you are doing well. By the way, due to your suggestion, i've selected a pseudonym which will be "Mad". I also agree with your comment on the inefficiency of the whole process of the endless argument and fights to get over a point. Many a times i've
135:
Note SSS108. You have stalked me on Knowledge (XXG), trying to disrupt my editing of the Arne Næss page. on which subject you have no knowledge, not least since he is Norwegian. To disrupt my editing by blanking my entry from mere spite is stalking. I do not wish you to send me messages to my user
156:
A cyberstalker follows the victim's online activity to gather information, initiate contact, make threats, or engage in other forms of verbal intimidation. Cyberstalkers target victims using online forums, bulletin boards, chat rooms, spyware, and spam. They may engage in live chat harassment or
1013:
which are a potential copyvio, regardless of its future deleted status. You could have uploaded any image in your "investigation", why a picture of a temple that is sourced online on my spiritual blog? Please refrain from uploading images that belong to me unless I have released them under a
100:
Negative information in an article or on a talk page regarding Sathya Sai Baba or organizations affiliated with him which is poorly sourced may be removed without discussion. The three revert rule shall not apply to such removal. This includes links to critical websites which contain original
1072:
I'm afraid you don't understand. Since the image did not come with any copyright license restrictions, I uploaded the image for research purposes and it was never intended to be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you do want anyone to use your images, you should specify so and stop posting them on
1220:
warning, it should be observed that you are not here on Knowledge (XXG) to protect the interests of "Sai devotees" nor are you authorised to use Knowledge (XXG) as a soapbox on their behalf. Following your logic, you have made personal attacks on many editors for their supposed beliefs in
996:, without giving any form of copyright restrictions. I uploaded it to compare the image stats with another user whom I was informed may be you under another sockpuppet. The picture upload was for research purposes and I will have to research the new sockpuppet suspicion via other means. 312:"You will see the determination of Moreno to stop you knowing what I wrote by the fact that he has deleted my request to you in your user paeg (see below on the discussion page). Just goes to emphasizse my point. Moreno is a full-time stalker and defamer. Robert Priddy 1515:
and they not anonymous or proxy IPs. I think it is really quite pathetic that I have to be pulled back on to Knowledge (XXG) to defend myself from stupid rumors started by conspiratorial admin who apparently have nothing better to do than play psychic instead of
101:
research or which consist of personal accounts of negative experiences with Sathya Sai Baba or organizations affiliated with him. It is inappropriate for a user to insert a link to a website maintained by the user (or in which the user plays an important role).
1921: 175:
different than how Andries keep track of my activity (and vice-versa). You are all word and no action. The page about Arne Næss contained original research, which is not allowed on Knowledge (XXG). You even called your material
1052:
are responsible for providing the copyright information. You cannot claim "I found it somewhere" especially since you are not the owner of the image. As it stands, the image in question is due to be deleted precisely
451:
and is defaming me with his unsupported, erroneous and spiteful accusations. This from someone who claims he knows how to research his facts and claims he is honest and truthful. I think the facts show otherwise.
1476:
and related articles. The Arbitration Committee reserves the right to amend these remedies as required and to issue additional remedies as necessary to provide a positive environment for collaboration on the
1123:
If you managed to hold your breath and think about what other editors are telling you instead of launching personal attacks galore, you might actually realise how much of a better Wikipedian you will become.
1283:
This has to end. I'm blocking you for 12 hours as a shot across your bows, in the hope that you'll use the time to calm down. If you continue as you have been, the next block will be considerably longer.
1875: 934: 930: 1430: 926: 916: 140:
primary target. The purpose could be to make editing Knowledge (XXG) unpleasant for the target, to undermine them, to frighten them, or to encourage them to stop editing entirely.
1812: 1469: 90: 74: 70: 186:
If you continue to post your long, rambling diatribes on my Talk Page, I will delete your posts. Take you whine, babble and venom elsewhere. I think if anyone has a case for
1194: 1932:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
1886:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
167:
If you are so sure I have been stalking you on Knowledge (XXG), file a complaint. It's not difficult to do. All of your activity is easily traceable and no one needs to
26: 1100:
should help to inform you. You obviously are incapable of understanding the simple point that whether I placed them on a forum without copyright restrictions or not is
557:
are co-responsible for the mean-spirited atmosphere here - this was also obvious long, long before I entered this page with some fairly restrained comments about them (
1225:
which basically involves making insulting or disparaging comments about other editors. Please refrain from such behaviour and comment on content, not on contributor.
951:
I have removed the material you posted to the evidence page because it exceeds the size limit. Please summarize your statement in 1000 words or less and repost it.
873:"In my haste I thought the user page was specifically related to the attempt by Gerald Moreno, a person who defames and stalks me throughout the web because I am 108:
Andries and SSB108 are forgiven any offenses they have committed by introducing unreliable information into the article and encouraged to edit in compliance with
153:"Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk someone. This term is used interchangeably with online harassment and online abuse. 521:
can be called supporting evidence - circumstantial or otherwise, as is seen above. I am stating fact, not slander without using derogatory terms like 'sleazy'
147:
a person's actions closely for an extended period of time; or contacting family members, friends, or associates of a target inappropriately cyberstalking
66: 56: 586:
the ones responsible for the mean-spirited atmosphere here. Wherever the anti-Sais travel their toxic behavior and agenda of hate and lies goes with them (
113: 105:
affiliated with him. It is inappropriate for a user to insert a link to a website maintained by the user (or in which the user plays an important role)
136:
pages, so please desist. And desist from blanking material I put on other Knowledge (XXG) articles, or you can be charged with vandalism, you know!
21: 352:
This the guy who is trying to portray himself as honest, sober and fair-minded. He defames me for his paranoid errors and is wholly unapologetic!
887:"I feel I do at least have a moral right to refute arguments directed against me...and will be further injured by a subjective account by a 684:"This synopsis is based on original research by a former teacher of Arne Næss' work for many years at the University of Oslo, Robert Priddy" 1372: 1268:
One more time Ekantik. This time, get a nice large icon of a stop-sign or Popeye or (your favorite) Batman and then warn me again! :-)
366:
On June 11th 2006, a person with the IP 210.210.37.103 submitted a comment on the Sathya Sai Baba talk page that stated the following:
822: 808: 758: 744: 651: 637: 508: 494: 422: 408: 263: 249: 31: 1511:. If you look at that page, I provided a screencap that shows my IP. If you compare that IP with my IP here, you will find they are 678:
article (without even referencing his complaint). I simply removed the original research that ProEdits (Robert Priddy) added to the
1481:
article, even if no additional case is brought forward. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee.
1243: 1189:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to 1182: 1079: 1460:
is instructed to make all future Knowledge (XXG) contributions related in any way to Sathya Sai Baba under a single username.
150:
You are also guilty of this on a large scale, and you know it. More precisely, you engage in what Knowledge (XXG) defines as:
794: 730: 623: 480: 394: 235: 1929: 1913: 1902: 109: 1591: 1255: 1190: 1785:
Chummer, at first blush we had to assume, even with good faith and given your behavior, that you were a sock. It took
956: 1883: 1867: 1856: 1597: 1791: 1762: 1682: 1658: 1643: 1572:
accused of being a sockpuppet for Sbs108. Since several admin have erroneously joined this conspiracy bandwagon
1301:
Peculiar, oblique, and unfounded comments on my Talk page are not coing to distract me from your behaviour. --
992:
The image will be automatically deleted in a few days time. You also published the image on a public forum on
183:. You are obviously oblivious to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies on original research and citing reliable sources. 1449: 1920:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1874:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1258:
from editing Knowledge (XXG).Second warning for further disparaging comments on editors' religious beliefs
1666: 1639: 816: 802: 752: 738: 645: 631: 502: 488: 416: 402: 257: 243: 81: 1786: 1576:, I am requesting an independent verification to defend myself from these patently absurd allegations. -- 1508: 952: 1353:. You should consider this your first and final warning. Do not engage in this sort of behavior again. 812: 798: 748: 734: 641: 627: 498: 484: 412: 398: 253: 239: 1436:
The above-named arbitration case has closed and the complete decision can be found at the link above.
1937: 1891: 1468:
are encouraged to use better sources and improved citation style. The remedies in the prior decision
1306: 1289: 1247: 1178: 1836: 1221:
genital-switching but you have not been warned on that count. You have been warned for violation of
868:
stated that Sathya Sai Baba was my guru, look at the following quotes where he stated exactly that:
1358: 761:) — attacked me on my user page, although my user page specifically requests others not to edit it 1350: 1789:
to exonerate you; most administrators do not have access to that tool. Please bury the hatchet. -
788: 724: 617: 474: 388: 229: 1586: 1422:
Please give your comment in the Sathya Sai talk page. This is for decision making on consensus.
1349:
Speculating on, or attempting to discern the real-life name of contributors is a violation of
929:. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 1034:
is suspicious. I suggest if you want to protect your images, you stop releasing them without
1845: 1482: 1092:
In future, do not upload images to Knowledge (XXG) for "research purposes" by which you may
1925: 1917: 1879: 1871: 1495:
It has come to my attention that some administrators have ridiculously accused me of being
1394: 1323:
Joe, does the claim of Sathya Sai Baba's sex change come from anti-Sai or pro-Sai sources?
1222: 1217: 1145: 1105: 1097: 1059: 1933: 1887: 1563: 1478: 1473: 1465: 1453: 1302: 1285: 512: 1472:
regarding poorly sourced information remain in force and apply to all editors working on
1156:: In response to Ekantik's off-topic comments and personal attacks against Sai devotees: 1216:
As you have modified this section to represent your view of why you received an initial
1609:
What do you mean? How am I supposed to vindicate myself of this ridiculous accusation?
1461: 1354: 1333: 1324: 970: 941: 1464:
is reminded that all edits must be supported by reliable sources. Editors involved at
1238: 1822: 1734: 1710: 1647: 1635: 1441: 1423: 848:
Priddy made this comment after I stated that I am not a follower of Sathya Sai Baba (
784: 780: 720: 716: 613: 609: 470: 466: 384: 380: 225: 221: 206: 158: 1909: 1863: 1533: 1457: 1437: 1259: 1226: 1198: 1125: 1063: 1048:
I'm afraid you just don't understand: When you upload an image to Knowledge (XXG),
1030:
forum without issuing any sort of copyright with the images, your current claim of
1015: 983: 306:, Priddy jumped to the worst case conspiratorial view and erroneously claimed that 695: 679: 675: 266:) — made a defamatory complaint against me on Angela's Knowledge (XXG) Talk Page: 547:. After having pressure put on ProEdits by both Freelanceresearch and myself, he 1841: 1776: 1651: 1610: 1577: 1548: 1524: 1496: 1445: 1409: 1375: 1269: 1208: 1153: 1135: 1083: 1039: 997: 703: 596: 453: 353: 191: 292:
Because Angela moved the comment, Priddy (unable to find his previous comment)
1922:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:SSS108/ArbCom Answers To Thatcher
1341:
Thanks for your comments. Best wishes to you too. Wikisunn 12th February 2007
838:
since he surprisingly declared this himself after some time about 2 years ago"
96:
This case is now closed and the result has been published at the link above.
766: 1817: 1173: 1009:
This doesn't answer the question of why you are uploading pictures that
1650:
who spuriously and unremittingly alleged I was using the sockpuppet of
536: 1941: 1895: 1876:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:SSS108/Sathya Sai Baba
1849: 1826: 1797: 1779: 1613: 1604: 1580: 1551: 1527: 1485: 1412: 1378: 1365: 1336: 1327: 1312: 1295: 1272: 1262: 1229: 1211: 1201: 1138: 1128: 1086: 1066: 1042: 1018: 1000: 986: 959: 946: 935:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2/Workshop
931:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2/Evidence
706: 599: 456: 356: 194: 161: 84: 1916:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 1870:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 901:"He is not only a defamer and critic of me, but of all critics of 1837:
http://wikiwatcher.virgil.gr/pmcu/user_view.php?user_name=SSS108#
1026:
That's for me to know :-) And since you released that image on a
933:. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 73:. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 1120:
should not upload images or other media. It's as simple as that.
1517: 1112:
to provide copyright information for any image they upload; if
1928:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
1882:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
682:
article. As a matter of fact, ProEdits (Robert Priddy) wrote,
511:) — made the following comment about Freelanceresearch on the 285:
Priddy's comment to the bottom of the page where it belonged:
119:
For the Arbitration Committee. 03:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
566:
As if this can't be embarrassing enough, Freelanceresearch
551:
that he made a mistake and retracted his comment. He said:
1431:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2
927:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2
917:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2
1813:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/SSS108/Archive
1470:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba
670:
he cited against me (pertaining to Knowledge (XXG)) was
91:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba
75:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya/Workshop
71:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya/Evidence
1770: 1766: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1674: 1670: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1165: 1161: 1157: 979: 974: 908: 894: 880: 849: 841: 769: 762: 691: 687: 655: 587: 558: 528: 524: 433: 374: 319: 315: 297: 286: 267: 180: 1626:
To all interested readers: I have been CLEARED of the
447:
make that post and ProEdits is jumping to conclusions
1503:
Sbs108 and the arguments made by admin that I am are
834:
stated that SSS108 is a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba,
362:
False Claims Against Me About Comments I Did Not Make
891:, if it is not truly an independent public document" 171:
you to get it. How I keep track of your activity is
925:An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: 65:An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: 27:User talk:SSS108/Mediation & Mediation Attempt 1401:This editor has decided to leave Knowledge (XXG). 1373:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Mel Etitis 575:"co-responsible for the mean-spirited atmosphere" 69:. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, 1418:Request for Comment: Regarding subcategory title 1197:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 765:. He was given a warning about his vandalism by 431:Andries.--ProEdits 14:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 654:) — wrote a rambling diatribe on my talk page ( 577:. As a matter of fact, Freelanceresearch said: 537:Knowledge (XXG) Block Log For Freelanceresearch 67:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya 57:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya 1733:Relevant accusations by Knowledge (XXG) Admin 1709:Relevant accusations by Knowledge (XXG) Admin 1681:Relevant accusations by Knowledge (XXG) Admin 1632:conspiratorial assumptions & speculations 1509:Mel Etitis and his Knowledge (XXG) Sockpuppet 1279:Incivility, harrassment, and personal attacks 114:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons 8: 1168:, which brought about the following warning: 425:) — wrote the following about this comment: 1096:bring Knowledge (XXG) into legal jeopardy. 1456:and related articles or their talk pages. 605:False Claims Of Harrassment & Stalking 462:False Accusation Against Freelanceresearch 80:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, -- 940:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 22:User talk:SSS108/archive1/June 16th 2006 15: 969:I'd like to ask what is the meaning of 281:where it should have been made) Angela 1930:User:SSS108/ArbCom Answers To Thatcher 1914:User:SSS108/ArbCom Answers To Thatcher 1903:User:SSS108/ArbCom Answers To Thatcher 1116:cannot provide copyright information, 864:. Regarding Priddy's comments that he 329:removed the text and insulted me as a 277:of Angela's talk page (instead of the 1811:To avoid confusion, I'm linking to: 1452:are banned indefinitely from editing 860:. This is a bold-faced and unsourced 273:Since Priddy made his comment on the 7: 1659:Sockpuppet Investigations For SSS108 1532:— Comments made by me under the nic 1389: 690:). To further strengthen my point, 325:That's right! Robert Priddy claimed 217:False Claims Of Deleting Information 1557:False Sockpuppetry Claim Against Me 1246:other editors, which you did here: 1622:Cleared Of Sbs108 Sockpuppet Claim 1207:Your admin facade makes me laugh. 32:User talk:SSS108/archive bucket 01 14: 1332:When are you going to disengage? 1177:With regards to your comments on 825:) — said (emphasis added by me): 1908: 1862: 1522:Practice what you preach, Admin! 1393: 1385:Disengaging From Knowledge (XXG) 1237: 1172: 110:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources 1181:: Please see Knowledge (XXG)'s 595:The untruths keep multiplying. 310:removed his post. Priddy said, 1605:08:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1520:like they are supposed to do. 443:by ProEdits against me. I did 1: 1942:03:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC) 1896:03:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC) 1827:23:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC) 1413:03:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 1379:14:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 1366:12:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 1337:17:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1328:14:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1313:09:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 1307: 1296:09:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1290: 1273:07:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 1263:18:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1230:18:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1212:06:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1202:02:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1139:06:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1129:03:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1087:19:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 1067:18:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 1043:07:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 1019:18:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1001:06:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 987:02:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 947:17:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 707:01:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 600:01:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 545:"banned from Knowledge (XXG)" 457:01:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 357:01:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 349:touched or edited that page! 195:20:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 162:20:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 1798:21:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC) 1780:06:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 1614:01:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1581:01:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1552:15:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 1528:05:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 1507:. I was banned for exposing 836:nor that he is Moreno's guru 712:Attacking Me On My User Page 18: 1884:User:SSS108/Sathya Sai Baba 1868:User:SSS108/Sathya Sai Baba 1857:User:SSS108/Sathya Sai Baba 960:09:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 856:Sathya Sai Baba as my guru 776:Lies About Me Having A Guru 515:Knowledge (XXG) talk page: 1957: 1058:For more information, see 664:"harrassment and stalking" 1850:08:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 1761:by Knowledge (XXG) Admin 1486:00:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 905:, Sri Sathya Sai Baba..." 903:his highly doubtful guru 127:Harassment and stalking 85:21:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 1665:Relevant accusation by 1250:. If you continue, you 1193:for disruption. Please 341:moved Priddy's comment 190:, it is I against you. 1924:and please be sure to 1878:and please be sure to 1815:. (October 14 2009,) 1807:confirmed sockpuppetry 1536:regarding this issue: 994:GaudiyaDiscussions.com 205:Blatant Untruths From 1144:No Personal Attacks ( 1038:on public forums :-) 698:article. I only made 1248:Talk:Sathya Sai Baba 1179:Talk:Sathya Sai Baba 1011:do not belong to you 875:a critic of his guru 692:View The History Tab 439:This is yet another 1518:assuming good faith 1426:22nd February 2007 1185:policy. Comment on 1183:no personal attacks 1036:"suitable licenses" 1032:"potential copyvio" 975:attempted to upload 178:"original research" 1926:sign your comments 1901:MfD nomination of 1880:sign your comments 1855:MfD nomination of 1014:suitable license. 877:, Sathya Sai Baba" 702:there. That's it. 348: 344: 340: 328: 1667:Crotalus horridus 1640:Crotalus horridus 1587:There is no cabal 1450:Freelanceresearch 1406: 1405: 1362: 980:OrphanBot request 978:responded to the 965:Picture of temple 535:According to the 346: 342: 338: 326: 304:Without any proof 39: 38: 1948: 1912: 1866: 1794: 1603: 1600: 1594: 1567: 1397: 1390: 1360: 1309: 1292: 1241: 1176: 944: 212: 204: 131: 126: 16: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1906: 1860: 1834: 1809: 1792: 1628:patently absurd 1624: 1598: 1592: 1590: 1561: 1559: 1493: 1491:I Am Not Sbs108 1479:Sathya Sai Baba 1474:Sathya Sai Baba 1466:Sathya Sai Baba 1454:Sathya Sai Baba 1434: 1420: 1407: 1387: 1347: 1321: 1281: 1150: 1098:WP:NOT#WEBSPACE 967: 942: 920: 778: 714: 662:accusing me of 607: 513:Sathya Sai Baba 464: 364: 219: 214: 209: 201: 154: 133: 128: 123: 120: 94: 60: 52: 12: 11: 5: 1954: 1952: 1905: 1899: 1859: 1853: 1833: 1830: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1801: 1800: 1774: 1773: 1763:Jéské Couriano 1750: 1749: 1730: 1729: 1706: 1705: 1683:Jéské Couriano 1678: 1677: 1662: 1661: 1644:Jéské Couriano 1623: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1558: 1555: 1492: 1489: 1433: 1428: 1419: 1416: 1404: 1403: 1398: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1346: 1343: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1170: 1169: 1149: 1142: 1132: 1131: 1121: 1070: 1069: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1004: 1003: 973:? And why you 966: 963: 919: 914: 913: 912: 898: 884: 846: 845: 777: 774: 713: 710: 606: 603: 593: 592: 582:Joe and I are 564: 563: 533: 532: 463: 460: 437: 436: 378: 377: 363: 360: 336: 332: 218: 215: 213: 199: 198: 197: 184: 152: 132: 121: 118: 117: 106: 102: 93: 88: 59: 54: 53: 51: 48: 46: 41: 37: 36: 35: 34: 29: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1953: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1904: 1900: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1858: 1854: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1838: 1831: 1829: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1814: 1806: 1804: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1788: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1778: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1621: 1615: 1612: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1595: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1574:with no proof 1571: 1565: 1556: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1519: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1505:wholly absurd 1502: 1498: 1490: 1488: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1432: 1429: 1427: 1425: 1417: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1402: 1399: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1371:My response: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1356: 1352: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1293: 1287: 1278: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244:do not attack 1240: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1141: 1140: 1137: 1130: 1127: 1122: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1081: 1080:Evidence Page 1076: 1075:public forums 1068: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1020: 1017: 1012: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 995: 991: 990: 989: 988: 985: 981: 976: 972: 964: 962: 961: 958: 954: 953:The Uninvited 949: 948: 945: 938: 936: 932: 928: 923: 918: 915: 910: 906: 904: 899: 896: 892: 890: 885: 882: 878: 876: 871: 870: 869: 867: 863: 859: 858:"2 years ago" 855: 851: 843: 839: 837: 833: 828: 827: 826: 824: 821: 818: 814: 810: 807: 804: 800: 796: 793: 790: 786: 782: 781:Robert Priddy 775: 773: 771: 768: 764: 760: 757: 754: 750: 746: 743: 740: 736: 732: 729: 726: 722: 718: 717:Robert Priddy 711: 709: 708: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 650: 647: 643: 639: 636: 633: 629: 625: 622: 619: 615: 611: 610:Robert Priddy 604: 602: 601: 598: 591: 589: 585: 580: 579: 578: 576: 573:that we were 572: 569: 562: 560: 554: 553: 552: 550: 546: 542: 538: 530: 526: 522: 518: 517: 516: 514: 510: 507: 504: 500: 496: 493: 490: 486: 482: 479: 476: 472: 468: 467:Robert Priddy 461: 459: 458: 455: 450: 446: 442: 435: 432: 428: 427: 426: 424: 421: 418: 414: 410: 407: 404: 400: 396: 393: 390: 386: 382: 381:Robert Priddy 376: 373: 369: 368: 367: 361: 359: 358: 355: 350: 334: 330: 323: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 299: 295: 290: 288: 284: 280: 276: 271: 269: 265: 262: 259: 255: 251: 248: 245: 241: 237: 234: 231: 227: 223: 222:Robert Priddy 216: 211: 208: 203: 200: 196: 193: 189: 188:"harrassment" 185: 182: 179: 174: 170: 166: 165: 164: 163: 160: 151: 148: 144: 141: 137: 130: 125: 122: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 98: 97: 92: 89: 87: 86: 83: 78: 76: 72: 68: 63: 58: 55: 49: 47: 45: 42: 33: 30: 28: 25: 23: 20: 19: 17: 1907: 1861: 1840: 1835: 1816: 1810: 1802: 1790: 1775: 1758: 1754: 1631: 1627: 1625: 1596: 1573: 1569: 1568:I have been 1560: 1531: 1521: 1512: 1504: 1500: 1494: 1435: 1421: 1408: 1400: 1348: 1340: 1331: 1322: 1282: 1251: 1236: 1186: 1171: 1166:this comment 1133: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1101: 1093: 1082:for ArbCom. 1074: 1071: 1054: 1049: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1025: 1010: 993: 968: 950: 939: 924: 921: 902: 900: 889:Sai follower 888: 886: 874: 872: 865: 861: 857: 853: 847: 835: 831: 829: 819: 813:80.111.21.76 805: 799:84.208.99.96 791: 779: 755: 749:80.111.21.76 741: 735:84.208.99.96 727: 715: 699: 683: 674:edit on the 671: 667: 663: 659: 648: 642:80.111.21.76 634: 628:84.208.99.96 620: 608: 594: 583: 581: 574: 570: 567: 565: 555: 548: 544: 540: 534: 519: 505: 499:80.111.21.76 491: 485:84.208.99.96 477: 465: 448: 444: 440: 438: 429: 419: 413:80.111.21.76 405: 399:84.208.99.96 391: 379: 370: 365: 351: 324: 311: 307: 303: 302: 293: 291: 282: 278: 274: 272: 260: 254:80.111.21.76 246: 240:84.208.99.96 232: 220: 210: 202: 187: 177: 172: 168: 155: 149: 145: 142: 138: 134: 129: 124: 95: 82:Tony Sidaway 79: 64: 61: 43: 40: 1787:CU evidence 1755:retractions 1593:Intelligent 1483:Newyorkbrad 852:). I never 666:. The only 441:blatant lie 1934:Ricky81682 1888:Ricky81682 1319:A question 1303:Mel Etitis 1286:Mel Etitis 1102:irrelevant 854:"declared" 668:"evidence" 571:"admitted" 539:, she has 296:it again: 50:Discussion 1753:Relevant 1735:Jzg / Guy 1648:Jzg / Guy 1462:Kkrystian 1355:Hipocrite 1351:WP:HARASS 1195:stay cool 1164:, I made 1110:uploaders 1108:requires 943:Cowman109 909:Reference 895:Reference 881:Reference 850:Reference 842:Reference 770:Reference 763:Reference 696:Arne Næss 688:Reference 680:Arne Næss 676:Arne Næss 656:Reference 588:Reference 559:Reference 449:a prirori 434:Reference 375:Reference 337:although 335:"defamer" 331:"stalker" 298:Reference 287:Reference 268:Reference 1918:deletion 1872:deletion 1832:Correct? 1711:Hersfold 1636:Hersfold 1634:made by 1513:the same 1442:Wikisunn 1424:Wikisunn 1334:Krystian 1325:Krystian 1094:possibly 830:"I have 823:contribs 809:contribs 795:contribs 785:ProEdits 759:contribs 745:contribs 731:contribs 721:ProEdits 700:one edit 694:for the 652:contribs 638:contribs 624:contribs 614:ProEdits 549:admitted 509:contribs 495:contribs 481:contribs 471:ProEdits 423:contribs 409:contribs 395:contribs 385:ProEdits 294:reposted 264:contribs 250:contribs 236:contribs 226:ProEdits 207:ProEdits 159:ProEdits 1759:apology 1570:falsely 1534:PSSS108 1499:. I am 1458:Ekantik 1438:Andries 1345:Warning 1260:Ekantik 1256:blocked 1242:Please 1227:Ekantik 1199:Ekantik 1187:content 1126:Ekantik 1078:on the 1064:Ekantik 1055:because 1016:Ekantik 984:Ekantik 922:Hello, 862:untruth 523:(Refs: 343:herself 314:(Refs: 169:"stalk" 62:Hello, 1842:Lenerd 1793:Jeremy 1777:SSS108 1652:Sbs108 1611:SSS108 1578:SSS108 1564:helpme 1549:SSS108 1525:SSS108 1497:Sbs108 1448:, and 1446:SSS108 1410:SSS108 1376:SSS108 1270:SSS108 1223:WP:NPA 1218:WP:NPA 1209:SSS108 1191:blocks 1154:SSS108 1146:WP:NPA 1136:SSS108 1106:WP:IUP 1084:SSS108 1060:WP:IUP 1040:SSS108 1028:public 998:SSS108 811:) aka 797:) aka 783:— aka 747:) aka 733:) aka 719:— aka 704:SSS108 660:falsly 640:) aka 626:) aka 612:— aka 597:SSS108 497:) aka 483:) aka 469:— aka 454:SSS108 411:) aka 397:) aka 383:— aka 354:SSS108 339:Angela 279:bottom 252:) aka 238:) aka 224:— aka 192:SSS108 1823:talk 955:Co., 866:never 568:never 543:been 541:never 347:never 283:moved 1938:talk 1892:talk 1846:talk 1757:and 1646:and 1630:and 1599:sium 1361:Talk 1308:Talk 1291:Talk 1252:will 1134:LOL 971:this 957:Inc. 817:talk 803:talk 789:talk 767:1568 753:talk 739:talk 725:talk 646:talk 632:talk 618:talk 503:talk 489:talk 475:talk 417:talk 403:talk 389:talk 345:. I 333:and 258:talk 244:talk 230:talk 112:and 1818:DGG 1501:NOT 1254:be 1118:you 1114:you 1050:you 832:not 672:one 584:not 445:not 300:. 275:top 181:Ref 44:TOP 1940:) 1894:) 1848:) 1825:) 1771:02 1769:- 1767:01 1765:: 1747:03 1745:- 1743:02 1741:- 1739:01 1737:: 1727:04 1725:- 1723:03 1721:- 1719:02 1717:- 1715:01 1713:: 1703:05 1701:- 1699:04 1697:- 1695:03 1693:- 1691:02 1689:- 1687:01 1685:: 1675:02 1673:- 1671:01 1669:: 1654:. 1642:, 1638:, 1589:. 1566:}} 1562:{{ 1546:03 1544:- 1542:02 1540:- 1538:01 1444:, 1440:, 1357:- 1311:) 1294:) 1284:-- 1162:02 1160:- 1158:01 1104:. 1062:. 982:. 937:. 911:). 897:). 883:). 844:). 772:. 658:) 590:). 561:). 529:02 527:- 525:01 322:) 320:02 318:- 316:01 289:. 270:. 173:no 77:. 1936:( 1890:( 1844:( 1821:( 1363:» 1359:« 1305:( 1288:( 1148:) 907:( 893:( 879:( 840:( 820:· 815:( 806:· 801:( 792:· 787:( 756:· 751:( 742:· 737:( 728:· 723:( 686:( 649:· 644:( 635:· 630:( 621:· 616:( 531:) 506:· 501:( 492:· 487:( 478:· 473:( 420:· 415:( 406:· 401:( 392:· 387:( 327:I 308:I 261:· 256:( 247:· 242:( 233:· 228:( 116:.

Index

User talk:SSS108/archive1/June 16th 2006
User talk:SSS108/Mediation & Mediation Attempt
User talk:SSS108/archive bucket 01
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya/Evidence
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya/Workshop
Tony Sidaway
21:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba
Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources
Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
ProEdits
20:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Ref
SSS108
20:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
ProEdits
Robert Priddy
ProEdits
talk
contribs
84.208.99.96
talk
contribs
80.111.21.76
talk
contribs
Reference
Reference

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.