Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:SS451

Source đź“ť

202:
certain editors were refusing to change/arguing that the wording should match exactly the phrase featured in the first few articles available of the incident which stated that Joyce "appeared to miss the call" instead of it being labeled as an "incorrect or missed call". Several TV broadcasts (MLB network and Fox Sports Detroit to name two) at that point were unequivocally stating that the call was missed whereas the slower print media was going with the appeared stating. At that point, it became common knowledge and no person with knowledge of the incident would argue against labeling the call as completely missed. Merely turning on Fox Sports Detroit or MLB network or getting a transcript of their broadcast would be required to obtain a source. A source existed, had already done your definition of OR, and was easily findable stating that the call was incorrect, much like what would be required in our Paris analogy. Unfortunately, you and perhaps several other editors seemed to be unwilling acknowledge this outside world. If you consider my proposed change OR with this set of facts, I believe that you are misinterpreting the guidelines. I can understand the confusion on your part if you lived in cave and only had internet access to Jim Joyce's wikipedia page. In that instance, you would not have knowledge of other sources not explicitly cited in my discussion. I also pray that you were not the who suggested that using a reputable newspaper from Detroit was a biased or impartial source. My only problem on the night of the game was that I was not familiar enough with the NOR policy to unequivocally prove you wrong.
172:
safe/out call at first base became a matter of common knowledge, although certainly not so common as the other facts just cited, but it is not now and probably never will be either well enough known or obvious enough on the face of it to omit a reference to a reliable, secondary source in place of an unadorned link to a picture or video. Essentially, when an interpretation of raw data is required, NOR forbids editors from doing that interpretation themselves and then adding it to an article, and forces us to rely on secondary sources in order to assure the quality of the project. It may seem a meaningless formality in a case like this, where the truth is relatively easy to ascertain with a working knowledge of the rules of baseball and adequate vision, but the policy applies regardless.
145:
call original research." No one knowledgeable of the Jim Joyce call would object to the call being called missed or incorrect. Sources could easily be found proving the call was missed in videos, pictures and published articles at the time of your post. Unfortunately, you and several wiki editors fascists were unwilling to take the time to verify the statements of everyone else. You decided to jump behind a policy without any critical thinking on your part. Fortunately, more knowledgeable heads have prevailed, and the page currently, accurately states that the call was incorrect. Thank you for doing your part IMO in ruining wikipedia.
256:
had been blown. And my point then, which I am still completely confident in, is that that kind of judgment call isn't permitted under the NOR policy, and that we have to leave the interpretation of visual information like that to secondary sources. TV and radio broadcasts could have been fine sources for such interpretation, the only problem being that they are usually difficult to cite in an acceptable form so soon after they occur. Written articles were, at that point, the most practical way we had of confirming the call's incorrectness
274:
advocating the use of raw data were wrong. I'm willing to accept that they (you) were innocently wrong--NOR really can be difficult to understand when one first learns about it. But wrong is what you were. The mistake was of little consequence in this case, given the abundance of reliable secondary sources which followed the primary sources originally used. But in other articles, you will find that using primary sources where secondary sources are missing or contradictory just will not fly.
1096: 1008: 920: 832: 744: 669: 596: 523: 458: 104:
The discussion was ongoing, but the other user involved was reverting my reversions as supposed vandalism (and violating the 3RR himself, although he doesn't appear to have been warned). This is my question: should I have left the poor-quality POV material in the article while discussion was ongoing?
241:
You'll note that throughout the discussion in the minutes immediately following the end of the game, I was advocating a cautious stance on our wording for the time being, while acknowledging the likelihood that as more secondary sources checked in, we would probably see a reliable consensus emerging
211:
On a second topic, you state that "probably never will be either well enough known or obvious enough on the face of it to omit a reference". Obviously this does not matter in this case since I had already posted references, but at what point do enough people have to know something for it to lack an
273:
So, on review, I was completely correct. Caution was warranted in the immediate aftermath of the game, and the cautious wording I suggested closely tracked the earliest written reports coming out of the game and did no harm whatsoever to the article's accuracy, either short- or long-term. And those
177:
I'm sorry you don't understand NOR; it can be tricky to grasp when a person is very used to employing their personal knowledge or "common sense" to reason and report on events in the world. For this project, however, that instinct isn't appropriate. Stick around a while, and I'm sure you'll get the
144:
Yes you misinterpreted Wiki's "No Original Research" policy which states, ""Paris is the capital of France" needs no source because no one is likely to object to it, but we know that sources for that sentence exist. If no source exists for something you want to add to Knowledge (XXG), it is what we
255:
But that's really tangential to the NOR issue. Some users (I don't know if you were one of them) were advocating an out-and-out statement that the call was incorrect on the basis of pictures and video alone. They were explicitly making the argument that it was obvious from the images that the call
201:
Yawn, I have edited several pages in the past with citations where appropiate. Perhaps you missed the 4 articles I posted in the discussion page on the night of the incident that sourced the call and the picture of the call that I sourced as well? I can forgive you for that. My problem is that
171:
for your vituperative hostility. In any event, I didn't misinterpret the NOR policy. Paris's relationship to France is a matter of common, almost universal knowledge, as is the fact that humans breathe air, and that IP address users are prone to hit-and-run personal attacks. That Joyce missed the
300:
At this point I am not arguing this "Some users were advocating an out-and-out statement that the call was incorrect on the basis of pictures and video alone." And obviously none of this matters; it is academic at this point. I obviously disagree with your interpretation of the policy, because
608:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
681:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
212:
immediate reference. Can you name the capital of the Mexican state of Aguascalientes? How many people in the world actually know the answer. The answer is Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes. Yet, this information is not sourced on Knowledge (XXG). Food for thought.
374:
Re-read the style guideline as the section you refer to is not part of the info box discussion, but refers to a separate table at the end of the article. The awards notable for the infobox are listed under infobox highlights. (repeating what i said on my talk page).
535:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
470:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
360:, which mentions as additional awards appropriate for the infobox "The Sporting News annual awards." Can you point me to the past discussions that you claim establish that only awards on your linked page should be placed in a player's infobox? 242:
that the call was in fact incorrect, and not merely that it appeared so. I never suggested that the wording be permanently fixed in any one form; that would have been foolish, given how close in time we were to the events described.
1141: 1053: 963: 875: 787: 709: 636: 563: 498: 80:
As far as how to better handle the situation in the future, I would suggest that you try to discuss on the talk page after your first revert. If this is a low-traffic page, you might also look at some of our other
413:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1125:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1037:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 947:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 859:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 771:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 693:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 620:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 547:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 482:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1110: 1022: 933: 845: 757: 357: 73:
First, please do not remove warnings from your talk page. We use them to make sure we aren't giving you any redundant information, and removing them can be considered
339: 42:
an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the
1164: 1076: 986: 897: 809: 723: 650: 577: 438: 1182: 312: 219: 152: 301:
secondary and primary sources existed stating the call was incorrect. If there more information on the policy other than located at
342:
start a discussion and ask whether or not that award should go in the infobox. Because based on past discussions only awards on
1160: 1072: 982: 893: 805: 719: 646: 573: 434: 1134: 1046: 956: 868: 780: 702: 629: 556: 491: 35: 425:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
31: 1146: 1058: 968: 880: 792: 714: 641: 568: 503: 430: 1122: 1034: 944: 856: 768: 690: 617: 544: 479: 1186: 308: 215: 148: 316: 223: 156: 426: 380: 1104: 1016: 927: 839: 751: 677: 604: 531: 513: 466: 448: 402: 393: 1118: 1030: 940: 852: 764: 686: 613: 540: 475: 422: 406: 53: 39: 361: 275: 184: 106: 30:)==== Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be 1130: 1042: 952: 864: 776: 698: 625: 552: 487: 418: 410: 74: 1153: 1065: 975: 887: 799: 131: 1133:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1126: 1045:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1038: 955:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 948: 867:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 860: 779:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 772: 701:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 694: 628:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 621: 555:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 548: 490:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 483: 421:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 414: 90: 376: 86: 82: 302: 347: 116: 1095: 1007: 919: 831: 743: 668: 595: 522: 457: 127: 52:, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning, but aviod making any 94: 59: 49: 343: 303:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia%3ANo_original_research#Reliable_sources
46:
of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.
20: 1137:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1049:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
959:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
871:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
783:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
705:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
632:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
559:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
494:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1114:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1026:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
937:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
849:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
761:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
409:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1190: 1168: 1080: 990: 901: 813: 727: 654: 581: 442: 384: 369: 350: 320: 283: 227: 192: 160: 134: 109: 98: 63: 1150:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1062:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 972:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 884:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 796:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 56:
within 24 hours of this warning in order to avoid any confusion.
23: 1140:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1108:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1052:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1020:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
962:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
874:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
786:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
708:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
635:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
562:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
497:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
931:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
843:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
27: 755:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1121:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1033:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
943:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
855:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
767:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
689:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
616:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
543:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
478:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
258:
in a manner which conformed to Knowledge (XXG) policies
123: 17: 401:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 356:If so, that is not reflected on the project's 8: 914: 826: 738: 340:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Baseball 34:from editing Knowledge (XXG) under the 140:Regarding Discussion Page of Jim Joyce 7: 1105:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 1017:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 928:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 840:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 752:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 678:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 605:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 532:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 467:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 183:Oh, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! 1123:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1089:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 1035:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1001:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 945:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 911:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 857:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 823:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 769:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 691:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 618:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 545:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 480:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 735:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 662:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 589:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 14: 427:review the candidates' statements 1094: 1006: 918: 830: 742: 667: 594: 521: 456: 1144:and submit your choices on the 1056:and submit your choices on the 966:and submit your choices on the 878:and submit your choices on the 790:and submit your choices on the 712:and submit your choices on the 639:and submit your choices on the 305:leave it here for me to read. 38:, which states that nobody may 433:. For the Election committee, 403:Arbitration Committee election 394:ArbCom elections are now open! 260:, and that's what I advocated. 1: 1169:00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 1081:00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 991:00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 902:01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 814:00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 728:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 582:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 443:12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 675:Hello, SS451. Voting in the 655:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 602:Hello, SS451. Voting in the 529:Hello, SS451. Voting in the 464:Hello, SS451. Voting in the 385:18:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 370:17:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 358:style guide for player pages 351:16:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 566:and submit your choices on 501:and submit your choices on 429:and submit your choices on 1206: 1191:18:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1161:MediaWiki message delivery 1073:MediaWiki message delivery 983:MediaWiki message delivery 894:MediaWiki message delivery 806:MediaWiki message delivery 720:MediaWiki message delivery 647:MediaWiki message delivery 574:MediaWiki message delivery 564:the candidates' statements 499:the candidates' statements 435:MediaWiki message delivery 64:12:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 135:01:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 110:18:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 99:14:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 1158:to your user talk page. 1070:to your user talk page. 980:to your user talk page. 892:to your user talk page. 804:to your user talk page. 365: 321:20:41, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 284:05:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 279: 228:05:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 193:02:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 188: 161:23:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC) 16:====Regarding reversions 1119:Arbitration Committee 1102:Hello! Voting in the 1031:Arbitration Committee 1014:Hello! Voting in the 941:Arbitration Committee 925:Hello! Voting in the 853:Arbitration Committee 837:Hello! Voting in the 765:Arbitration Committee 749:Hello! Voting in the 687:Arbitration Committee 614:Arbitration Committee 541:Arbitration Committee 514:ArbCom Elections 2016 476:Arbitration Committee 449:ArbCom Elections 2016 407:Arbitration Committee 346:go in the infobox.-- 334:Fielding Bible Award 91:requests for comment 411:arbitration process 1135:arbitration policy 1047:arbitration policy 957:arbitration policy 869:arbitration policy 781:arbitration policy 703:arbitration policy 630:arbitration policy 557:arbitration policy 516:: Voting now open! 492:arbitration policy 451:: Voting now open! 423:arbitration policy 83:dispute resolution 1171: 1083: 998: 997: 993: 908: 907: 820: 819: 311:comment added by 218:comment added by 151:comment added by 69:Re: 3RR violation 36:three-revert rule 1197: 1159: 1157: 1098: 1071: 1069: 1010: 981: 979: 922: 915: 891: 834: 827: 803: 746: 739: 671: 598: 525: 460: 323: 230: 163: 85:options such as 1205: 1204: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1151: 1099: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1063: 1011: 1003: 973: 913: 885: 825: 797: 737: 732: 731: 672: 664: 659: 658: 599: 591: 586: 585: 569:the voting page 526: 518: 510: 509: 504:the voting page 461: 453: 431:the voting page 397: 336: 306: 213: 146: 142: 120: 71: 12: 11: 5: 1203: 1201: 1181:Joseph stalin 1178: 1175: 1142:the candidates 1111:eligible users 1100: 1093: 1092: 1090: 1087: 1054:the candidates 1023:eligible users 1012: 1005: 1004: 1002: 999: 996: 995: 964:the candidates 934:eligible users 923: 912: 909: 906: 905: 876:the candidates 846:eligible users 835: 824: 821: 818: 817: 788:the candidates 758:eligible users 747: 736: 733: 710:the candidates 673: 666: 665: 663: 660: 637:the candidates 600: 593: 592: 590: 587: 527: 520: 519: 517: 511: 462: 455: 454: 452: 446: 400: 396: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 335: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 234: 233: 232: 231: 206: 205: 204: 203: 196: 195: 180: 179: 174: 173: 141: 138: 119: 114: 113: 112: 70: 67: 48:If this is an 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1202: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183:41.115.34.170 1176: 1172: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1155: 1149: 1148: 1143: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1115: 1113: 1112: 1107: 1106: 1097: 1088: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1067: 1061: 1060: 1055: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1009: 1000: 994: 992: 988: 984: 977: 971: 970: 965: 960: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 936: 935: 930: 929: 924: 921: 917: 916: 910: 904: 903: 899: 895: 889: 883: 882: 877: 872: 870: 866: 862: 858: 854: 848: 847: 842: 841: 836: 833: 829: 828: 822: 816: 815: 811: 807: 801: 795: 794: 789: 784: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 760: 759: 754: 753: 748: 745: 741: 740: 734: 730: 729: 725: 721: 717: 716: 711: 706: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 683: 680: 679: 670: 661: 657: 656: 652: 648: 644: 643: 638: 633: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 610: 607: 606: 597: 588: 584: 583: 579: 575: 571: 570: 565: 560: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 537: 534: 533: 524: 515: 512: 508: 506: 505: 500: 495: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 472: 469: 468: 459: 450: 447: 445: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 395: 392: 386: 382: 378: 373: 372: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 354: 353: 352: 349: 345: 341: 338:Please go to 333: 322: 318: 314: 310: 304: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 285: 281: 277: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 259: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 229: 225: 221: 217: 210: 209: 208: 207: 200: 199: 198: 197: 194: 190: 186: 182: 181: 176: 175: 170: 166: 165: 164: 162: 158: 154: 150: 139: 137: 136: 133: 129: 125: 118: 117:Antony Beevor 115: 111: 108: 103: 102: 101: 100: 96: 92: 88: 87:third opinion 84: 78: 76: 68: 66: 65: 61: 57: 55: 51: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 1180: 1145: 1139: 1116: 1109: 1103: 1101: 1057: 1051: 1028: 1021: 1015: 1013: 967: 961: 938: 932: 926: 879: 873: 850: 844: 838: 791: 785: 762: 756: 750: 713: 707: 684: 676: 674: 640: 634: 611: 603: 601: 567: 561: 538: 530: 528: 502: 496: 473: 465: 463: 398: 337: 313:68.40.48.139 257: 220:68.40.48.139 168: 153:68.40.48.139 143: 122:Guess who's 121: 79: 72: 47: 43: 15: 1147:voting page 1059:voting page 969:voting page 881:voting page 793:voting page 715:voting page 642:voting page 307:—Preceding 214:—Preceding 178:hang of it. 147:—Preceding 124:at it again 1131:topic bans 1043:topic bans 953:topic bans 865:topic bans 777:topic bans 699:topic bans 626:topic bans 553:topic bans 488:topic bans 419:topic bans 377:Spanneraol 167:No, thank 50:IP address 1127:site bans 1039:site bans 949:site bans 861:site bans 773:site bans 695:site bans 622:site bans 549:site bans 484:site bans 415:site bans 348:Yankees10 344:this page 75:vandalism 309:unsigned 216:unsigned 149:unsigned 21:March 31 19:made on 1177:History 1154:NoACEMM 1066:NoACEMM 976:NoACEMM 888:NoACEMM 800:NoACEMM 54:reverts 32:blocked 405:. The 128:Calton 44:effect 40:revert 362:SS451 276:SS451 185:SS451 107:SS451 95:ESkog 60:ESkog 1187:talk 1165:talk 1117:The 1077:talk 1029:The 987:talk 939:The 898:talk 851:The 810:talk 763:The 724:talk 685:The 651:talk 612:The 578:talk 539:The 474:The 439:talk 381:talk 366:talk 317:talk 280:talk 224:talk 189:talk 157:talk 132:Talk 126:? -- 89:and 24:2006 399:Hi, 169:you 93:. ( 28:UTC 1189:) 1167:) 1156:}} 1152:{{ 1129:, 1079:) 1068:}} 1064:{{ 1041:, 989:) 978:}} 974:{{ 951:, 900:) 890:}} 886:{{ 863:, 812:) 802:}} 798:{{ 775:, 726:) 718:. 697:, 653:) 645:. 624:, 580:) 572:. 551:, 507:. 486:, 441:) 417:, 383:) 368:) 319:) 282:) 226:) 191:) 159:) 130:| 97:) 77:. 62:) 1185:( 1163:( 1075:( 985:( 896:( 808:( 722:( 649:( 576:( 437:( 379:( 364:( 315:( 278:( 222:( 187:( 155:( 58:( 26:(

Index


March 31
2006
UTC
blocked
three-revert rule
revert
IP address
reverts
ESkog
12:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
vandalism
dispute resolution
third opinion
requests for comment
ESkog
14:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
SS451
18:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Antony Beevor
at it again
Calton
Talk
01:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
unsigned
68.40.48.139
talk
23:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
SS451
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑