User talk:SchfiftyThree/Archive 8

1036: 1332: 1169: 964: 766: 583: 31: 811: 384: 486: 742:, and he kept vandalizing the page (through both moves and edit summary vandalism) after his contributions were deleted. (The subsequent "contributions" have also been deleted.) If you really think it should be unprotected, I will do so, but in my opinion it's just asking for trouble. Again, please let me know about any other pages that you think should be unprotected. 1491: 717:

you can't see a reason for moveprotection, email me and I'll either explain or unprotect. And for heaven's sake, don't leave the project -- that is exactly what this vandal wants (in an incredibly gross overreaction to not being allowed to post a bunch of Dungeons & Dragons pages five years ago).

1626:

of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page.

1056:

If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor — this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on. I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me

716:

Some pages are moveprotected because Jarlaxle/Grawp or a wannabe tried to move them, but were stopped by the edit filter. The attempted move still shows up in the EF logs, and because of these vandals' mulish persistence, I moveprotect the intended targets. If you have specific pages in mind that

1571:

As requested, I've added rollback to your account again - as we discussed at the original rollback request, I'm confident you know what you're doing with it and just wanted to see a slightly longer period of non-controversial editing. Best of luck with Huggle, etc - as always, just be sure to only

220:

SchfiftyThree emailed me the other day to say hello, that he misses the people he worked with and respected here, but that he is still busy with real-life events and is still retired here. However, he is doing fine in real-life. He wanted me to mention this on his talk page, and that he conveys he

1383:

1306:

1217:

134:

Ah, yes that page. It's actually quite a mess, because it exceeds the template namespace, so I can't add to it, really. I haven't looked at the linked recent changes for a few days now, but I can so for sure that (in retrospect) it has been working like a charm. Of course, thanks to the newly

1197:. Sorry I have no idea how non-admins are supposed to find out that globally locked accounts are in fact blocked, but admins can see it. You should probably trust them. You can see the hidden block entry in my block log. Most of these German names are globally blocked very quickly. -- 1415:

on stuff like that. It could've been the guy's first edit, or possibly a test, or an edit by someone who doesn't know how wikis work. You do good work, but you just need to remember that not every incident like that is vandalism outright, kay? Other than this, keep up the good work!

453:

Yes, I deem that edit vandalism because the user, who I already knew contested the CSD of his page, replaced your statement with something else. That, in my opinion, defines vandalism. As to my quickness with Huggle; I've had about 8-10 months worth of practice :). Cheers,

826:

And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God.

1049:

Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 15 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc).

1446:

I'm not an administrator :P I can't remove anything. Besides, it wasn't like something horribly wrong. You should still have the ability to use Friendly and Twinkle. I don't see how those can be removed

1302: 1213: 1622: 1379: 398:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1654:, as I think since it's just your opinion, you should bring up a discussion about it instead of removing it. If you create a discussion, I will be more than happy to explain my reasons. =) - 104:

Agree with the above post: I've found my interactions with you to be very positive, and I am sorry to see you semi-retire. As always you will be welcome to return at any time. Best wishes.

410: 409:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

90:

Sorry to hear that you're too busy to go on at the same pace :/ You've been a great contributer and I'll still be happy if you can help out with anything at all. Best wishes,

1009: 1345: 1259: 1182: 1053:

The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet — if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated!

977: 783: 596: 1008:

Hmm. I would say boldly split them into articles on the individual albums -- albums by notable artists are usually good enough for their own articles -- then prod the

1043: 119:

It's a real bummer that you're to busy to edit here anymore. I hope you reconsider if you do have the time, but the choice is yours. Good luck!

292:

No problem. It may not be long before I start taking another break, however... :-O But, what the heck. editing wikis is what I'm devoted to!

250: 202: 1594:

Will definitely do. I've missed it for quite a while and need to use it again. After all, vandalism fighting is what I'm known for! :-)

1456:

Yeah, and it turns out that it was another user's fault, so now I'm using it again. It's like I was almost having a heart attack. :-D

1080: 1017: 373: 1636: 1393: 1316: 1227: 605: 69: 64: 59: 891:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 691:. I guess it's not really a challenge when the user states they're vandalizing in the edit summary :) Keep up the good work 829: 822: 499:) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the 391: 1527: 589: 582: 503:

by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!

1511: 38: 136: 245: 197: 1602: 1464: 1434: 1149: 1131: 896:

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:TTTSNB/Merry_Christmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

669: 563: 522: 359: 300: 283:

Welcome back SchfiftyThree! It's good to have you here again, though I hope the break was beneficial. Best.

271: 47: 17: 399: 1074: 1035: 1519: 887:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

1680: 1659: 1632: 1389: 1312: 1223: 772: 765: 173: 884: 434:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1515: 1360: 1338: 1331: 1283: 1175: 1168: 970: 963: 747: 739: 722: 699: 466: 439: 339: 314: 994: 545: 496: 240: 192: 1595: 1536: 1457: 1427: 1142: 1127: 1126:

That comment wasn't directed at you, it was directed at the IP flood. Sorry for the confusion. --

662: 556: 515: 352: 293: 264: 231: 989:

Its somewhat cruel you know, tagging the page as "gibberish, with no meaningful content". Haha.-

1557: 1545: 1063: 507: 144: 124: 95: 1503: 1499: 1482: 500: 1685: 1655: 1628: 1385: 1308: 1251: 1219: 1107: 792: 420:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

178: 1495: 1412: 431: 421: 414: 403: 1691: 1663: 1640: 1609: 1588: 1561: 1471: 1451: 1441: 1420: 1397: 1367: 1353: 1320: 1290: 1276: 1265: 1231: 1201: 1156: 1135: 1116: 1086: 998: 952: 938: 798: 779: 751: 743: 726: 718: 706: 692: 676: 655: 648: 630: 570: 549: 529: 474: 455: 443: 435: 366: 345: 320: 307: 287: 278: 257: 225: 209: 184: 159: 148: 128: 108: 99: 1673:

Hello SchfiftyThree. Yes, I still remember you. Thanks for the greetings. :-) Regards,

1448: 1417: 990: 949: 541: 492: 284: 222: 156: 105: 810: 390:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

351:

Thanks, and the new signature was supposed to be new as part of my "returning state".

424:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

1553: 734:

It's not a "hobby", and I don't do moveprotects "because I like to." For example,

140: 120: 91: 1675: 1243: 1198: 903: 844: 168: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

383: 1573: 641: 485: 888: 880: 540:

Thanks for the user page revert while I was busy blocking that account. --

263:

Thanks. Hopefully, I should be gaining more activity if I keep visiting!

1490: 735: 1514:. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your 1494:

Hey there SchfiftyThree, thank you for your contributions! I am a

395: 377: 337:

And I just fired off another one to you. Cheers. Btw, nice sig.

819: 25: 189:

Sorry to see you too. Good luck to your real-life endeavors.

1348: