User talk:Sarastro1/Archive 14

1042:

Somerset. Off the top of my head, I recall a little bit more in Wisden over the issue (I'd have to check, which I will at some point today). I think there might be something in the Peter Roebuck biography from a year or two ago as well. Anything to give some wider context; maybe something about the number of OD competitions, and the growing pressure on teams, etc etc. I notice that the Williamson article links to the underarm controversy; maybe something else somewhere makes a few links between this and growing commercialism. And did anything ever come officially from Somerset such as an official rebuke, or anything in the yearbook or from the committee? (It might be in the article, I've only skimmed it, so I apologise if I missed it!) Ironically, for all that cricket has recently gone down the filthy lucre route, including ultra-professionalism and match fixing, there has never been anything like this in terms of official cheating since the early 1980s!

212:

try to perfect everything. Of course, this doesn't help our FAs, although many useful edits do happen to them. For article review purposes, all I ask is that an article meet the standards of the process when I review it. If my personal standards were tighter, I'd spend more time worrying about what parts of an article may deteriorate than judging what exists on its merits. To me, all I can do is assume good faith that an article will be keep up-to-date by the nominator or others; if it isn't, FAR can handle it. If I ever get free time, I'll have to look at the Sedins' articles and see what I can do; Filatov will be harder since he plays in Russia and the language barrier will be a problem.

1385: 1608: 140:, sorry for the delay in replying. I'd be delighted to help if I can. I should have some time to take a look this week, and I can leave comments on the article talk page where necessary. The first thing that leaps out though is length. At over 10000 words, it's quite long; a) it might struggle to attract reviewers and b) people will comment that it is over detailed. If possible, it could do to be cut. I've had sports articles get through at that length before, but if we can, trimming would be good. 748: 833:"In April 1963, when a Bristol bus company was refusing to employ black staff, Constantine visited the city and spoke to the press about the issue. His intervention assisted in a speedy resolution of the affair which, according to Mason, was crucial in persuading the British government of the need for a Race Relations Act. However, politicians in both Trinidad and Britain felt a senior diplomat should not be so closely involved in British domestic affairs" 31: 1650: 1261: 551: 1877:

comments, and Ian Rose is most likely skipping over these because of that in order to allow you to complete their review processes. Normally, I would be content to wait as long as it takes for an FAC in which I have heavily participated to be reviewed by an FAC coordinator, but in this instance I insist that these FACs be concluded before 25 March. This is because the

1624: 806:, I had reviewed the body of the article and found no references to support the wording of the lead in using the term 'controversial' in any source and neither did I find a source to suggest he was critiqued for being part of the establishment (or by whom). You have included these statements back into the article, please clarify where they are referenced? 1350: 677:

review myself. I think the article flows much better now, and is a much easier and smoother read. I may even get some more comments from FunkMonk. I am keen to put it up for FAC again in the coming days, but I wondered if you would be happy to take a quick look and let me know whether you think that it's ready or close to being ready. Many thanks,

595:

definitely made me more aware of reliable vs. unreliable sources and I will take that with to my future work on here. I will be better when getting constructive criticism, as it only serves to help me and better the article and/or list in question. Hope you are doing well, and good luck with all of your work and projects on here and in real life.

1423:

I've come to the conclusion that my head is, or has been, in an entirely different world than everyone else on Knowledge (XXG). I take it way too seriously. I think there's a right answer and a wrong answer. There isn't. Sanger was right: it's purely social; it's the Encyclopedia Game. I don't fit in

1331:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering

717:

Not sure if you’ve been following this, but I’m pleased to say that the second FAC seems to have gained a lot of good comments and support. Today marks one week to go until the centenary of the declaration, and I am still hoping there is a chance to get it to TFA in time. If you have a moment, please

451:

The trophy is named after D'Oliveira, not the D'Oliveira affair, and therefore if we are to mention it, it belongs in that article. Secondly, you did not source the statement and, as a FA, we really should have high quality sources. If we were to include it (and I'm happy to discuss further), we need

1206:

Each FAC is a "clean slate" and supports/opposes do not carry forward, although where applicable, we encourage unaddressed concerns to be dealt with before renomination. I think in this case, it may be worth approaching a few reviewers and asking them if they could have a look; that practice is fine

1060:

talks a bit about the financial rewards that might have had an impact, and there was the similar instance in Welsh club cricket recently which might be worth mentioning I guess. I'd like to pinpoint more details on the change of rulesrules (the article currently follows the source in saying the laws

504:

Just to clarify this: for a FA spot-check, we need someone to have checked a few references (not all) to ensure that a) they do actually support the information in the article for which they are cited and b) there is no copyvio or close paraphrasing. If you did (or can do) both of these things, then

238:

To be honest, I'd bracket current actors, writers, politicians, etc together. How can they be stable when it could all change tomorrow? Other articles are vulnerable to new developments, of course, but for cases like these, the changes are inevitable and the "FA-version" will be guaranteed to be out

211:

During my long editing career, I've come to see imperfections as an inherent part of Knowledge (XXG)'s model; I fight against them regularly with my edits, but they keep on coming from every angle, even with well-intentioned edits. It's a wiki, and this stuff is going to happen no matter how hard we

676:

FAC review. I was disappointed at the time, particularly in light of the aim to hit the upcoming centenary, but in hindsight it turned out to be exactly what the article needed. It catalyzed a bunch of additional peer review comments, and also it allowed me to step back and perform another thorough

594:

Hello again! I just wanted to thank you for your help with the "Barge of the Dead" FAC, and apologize for my negative response to your comments. I greatly appreciate that you took the time to provide feedback, and I learned a lot about source reliability and use from that particular FAC process. It

259:

I've just read through the FAC remarks, and I have a pretty good sense of the main disagreement. I have yet to read the article itself (and maybe I should have done that first, but oops). I'll try to approach the article as I would any other and see where that takes me. At the end of this, I'll add

1335:

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and

363:

Congratulations on this. I don't think that "Representing the Cambridge cricket team in 1920, he once scored centuries against Oxford and in the Gentlemen v Players match within the space of a week" merits featuring in the lead quite so prominently, in between his Test achievements. In any case it

1876:

are ready for your review. I believe the former has satisfied what you requested, and I believe the latter has done the same, depending on whether you interpret Sladen's last comment on the bottom of that review as a support. These are currently the only active FACs where you have previously left

979:

Hello! A couple of things; nothing urgent! First of all, I got the ping to the Ethiopian historiography FAC but was in the middle of something and the next time I looked Cas and Mike seemed to have things in hand. I just wanted to say please feel free to ping me for anything that's struggling for

906:

No problem, I'd actually forgotten! In any case, I've pinged you (yet again!) at another article which is desperate for review. The nominator writes about unusual but interesting topics which are rather scarce at FAC, and is rather disenchanted with the process. I'd really rather not lose someone

476:

FA candidate - as I'm sure you're already aware, mentioning one's area of expertise can be quite daunting on WP and at times more of a detriment than a plus which is why I'm bringing it to your TP rather than including it as part of the FA discussion. I just wanted you to know that as an advanced

275:

On this subject.. you owe me. As a female gamer, I feel slimed reading some of the sources in the article. That's not even getting to the gods-awful crappy adware the sites employ that is dragging my computer down or the problems I see with lack of high quality sources. There's a reason I haven't

1193:

Two weeks it is then. I think I can wait after nothing at GA for two months, a wasted month and the past month here, although that was productive and bought it up to pretty much the best it could be. A PR will be a no hoper. What if the next FAC attracts the same or less as this one, will the be

202:

Hi, Sarastro. I'm doing just fine, although I don't have as much time for reviewing as I'd like. I really don't see any practical solution for this issue. It is true that biographies of active athletes can become outdated and drop below FA standards, but this is also true for articles in a wide

1470:

Seasonal greetings for 2017, and best wishes for 2018. Heartfelt thanks to you for your contributions, which have done much to enhance the encyclopedia and make me feel it's worthwhile to keep contributing. So here's to another year's productive editing, with old feuds put aside and peace,

1041:

Sorry for the delay replying to this, it's been a busy couple of weeks. I had a quick look, and I think the biggest issues for me would be the background and aftermath. For something like this, I think we could do with slightly stronger sourcing and a bit more about the wider picture, not just

207:

is clearly about a subject who will have additional projects that will need to be added/fleshed out in his article as time passes. It doesn't strike me as fair to bar articles on active athletes, but not active actors, as they will have the same problems if left unmonitored. Even articles in

1273:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1163: 208:

seemingly stable fields will need updating over time, and these updates may or may not be done properly. From my experience, the first FA I wrote has needed updates that I couldn't have anticipated when working on the page, and my second FA requires periodic (typically yearly) updates.

951:

No worries on the pings! I think Czar would be a better reviewer on this than I would; I probably wouldn't get to it till the weekend anyway, so I'll wait and see. I'll leave the ping undismissed and check; feel free to remind me by Sunday if there's been no review by then.

1873: 781:, "the first first-class cricket match to take place in Australia, although that is more of a quirk of history as the concept of such games is rather anachronistic. However, it was a grand occasion and the first cricket game between two colonies/states in Australia."! -- 1456: 1194:

considered as one in terms of the amount of support? What if there would've been three further one-line supports? I only worked on this to get it to FAC (which doesn't mean I didn't care), and for it to not get it would be probably put me off ever doing one again.

980:

input I can't promise I'll answer every time, but if I'm about and not neck-deep in something else I'll try and take a look. I'm hoping to sit down and do some reviewing over the weekend because I'm behind and there are a few articles I'd like to look at. Second,

489:

instructor for NAUI, (all of which are emeritus now), I did verify the critical statements made in the article to the cited sources, and all were verifiable. If for whatever reason you don't consider my review adequate for what you are expecting, I understand.

428:

wasn't mentioned as in my opinion it represents a culmination of the whole affair in the sweep of history, of cricket and even more of South Africa and beyond. This comes after my reading of Oborne's magistral book (which incidentally came out in 2004 also).

610: 699:

It isn't really up to me if it is ready or not; the coordinators only look at what the reviewers think. I could take a look, but it would be as a reviewer and not a coordinator, and I think you have plenty of quality reviewers looking at it already.

397:

Ah, I'd always assumed that the TFA blurb was a faithful reproduction of the article's lead (I hate the unnecessary coinage "lede" with a passion) but with the citations removed. I'd never thought to compare a blurb with an article's actual lead. JH

154:

Thanks Sarastro1, I'll keep an eye out for any further comments. As for the length, I did grow wary of it as the page expanded, and made efforts to shorten parts and excise others. But it has been difficult cutting it back further, given that, as

875:

I'm happy to take a look, but I did do quite a bit of work on the article's review section (see the talk page), so I think you'd want someone else to review the prose in that section. I'll look over the rest of it this weekend if I have time.

869: 850:

Harrias has answered this better than I could, and the cited information is not hard to find in the article. The reference given in the section quoted here will take you to the pages in Mason’s book where this information is given.

1869: 177:

know that I haven't forgotten this, and have started looking. I'll post a few comments on the talk page in the next few days; I think most of my comments will be about trimming, the basic shape and sourcing looks about right.

239:

of date, and we can only hope that the nominator, or whoever, keeps up with it. But as you say, that is a fault in the model that cannot really be fixed, and I think your take on this is spot on. I'll stop grumbling now!

1791: 1301: 1153: 382:

Sorry, I wasn't around for TFA day! I think you are right about this, but it was only on the TFA blurb (which I couldn't have tweaked anyway as it needs an admin to do it) so I hope it doesn't matter too much now.

1098: 1754:

Hello, its been over a week since the last review and support. The article currently has four supports and reviews have covered everything from sourcing to images to the text. Is there anything else needed?

1574:

I thought that it may have been human error, and perfectly understandable during this mad run-up to Christmas in addition to the commendable volume of work you undertake here on Knowledge (XXG). Regards,

1073: 1179:

FACs don't last as long as that to be honest, and whenever they are transcluded late, they generally don't end well. In any case, the article can be renominated after the usual 2-week waiting period.

1285:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1794:, which has been open since 27 January and appears to me to be well on track to soon be closed as successful (5 supports and no unaddressed comments). Would it be OK if I started a second FAC for 755: 204: 829:"In his last years, Constantine was criticised for becoming part of the Establishment; Private Eye mocked him, while the new generation of West Indian immigrants believed he was out of touch." 334:, I've tweaked the blurb a bit as I think we need something about his popularity and heavy drinking. Let me know what you think, and obviously feel free to change anything I've messed up. 1733: 364:

needs rewording, as he wasn't representing Cambridge in the second of those matches, as the sentence seems to say. I considered editing it myself, but I'm reluctant to change a FA. JH (

307: 616:

Hi Sarastro, I'm just wondering what the status is on this FAC. Does it need more reviewers? Or are you recusing yourself from promoting it because you did the source review? Thanks! —

1207:

at FAC as long as it isn't a case of "please support my article". Finally, we do not count supports in considering promotion, but rather look at the depth of review and if all of the

122:

and by far you are best suited to the subject. I'd be grateful for any advice or suggestions on how to further enhance the article's quality in the lead-up to the FAC nomination. -

1882: 1402:

Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free and you not often get distracted by dice-playing.

159:, "Tom Wills’s life ... acted as a conduit for an amazing range of historical forces." If in the end it's necessary to trim the article then I'll figure out a way. - 1014:

Thanks for your review of the Kieswetter FAC; I'm hopefully working through the last few wrangles on that at the moment. I wondered if you'd take a quick look over

1018:

and let me know what you think might need doing before a potential FAC? Personally, I feel it's a bit light on contemporary commentary, partly due to the lack of

1076:

might be of interest. I've spent a fair bit of time refining and adding to this GA from a few years ago, and think it's more or less ready for a round here!

1890: 1732:

for 11 February 2018. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at

1795: 156: 118:

article intermittently for a few years. In 2014 it passed a GA review and now I think it is finally approaching FA quality. I went through the list of

306:

for September 3, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at

1725: 1717: 778: 921:

I can certainly look at that -- not sure when, but not later than Sunday evening, I think. I'll leave Unlocked for now in case Josh gets to it.

1897:). Getting those little bronze stars placed in the top-right corners of those articles before they get a big spike in pageviews would be ideal. 519:

Done, and noted on the review page. Thank you for the outstanding work you do in making sure our FA candidates are truly worthy of promotion.

1548:

Turns out that the glitch was that I'm an idiot. I never saved the page when I promoted it. My fault. Or maybe my computer. But probably me.

1346:

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

1315: 965: 934: 889: 1427:

I swore to myself that I would continue with Famine '43 until it is FA. I doubt I will continue editing after that. I am too burned out.

984:

seems to be making good progress even though it's only been open a couple of weeks and I was wondering if I could have leave to nominate

961: 930: 885: 1744: 1384: 1893:

is prominently linked in Walt Disney World Railroad's See also section (both are railway attractions within major theme parks in

1311: 1015: 1008: 1294: 416:

Hi Sarastro1. Firstly congrats on all that work you've done on all those cricketers. Secondly, I strongly disagree with your

84: 72: 67: 59: 1061:

were changed) but I think it was the playing conditions that actually changed. Struggling to find anything for that though!

822: 119: 310:, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! 1332:

information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

988:

over the weekend? It's had an A-class review an it's no a huge article so I'm not anticipating any major problems. Best,

1770:

Sorry, I've been busy and only working through the FAC list slowly. I've promoted it now and I apologise for the delay.

1607: 1306: 478: 1886: 1878: 38: 477:

open water instructor and an u/w photography specialty instructor for two different SCUBA certification agencies (

569: 1816:. I'm working through the backlog slowly, and should get to it soon, but a second FAC is fine in the meantime. 1581: 1503: 425: 1282: 1340: 1367: 957: 926: 881: 438: 1476: 1244: 835:(which makes it controversial). Both referenced appropriately inline in the article to Mason's 2008 book. 786: 768: 723: 682: 354: 101: 1701:

That's fine with me. I should get to closing the current one tomorrow as I seem to have missed it today!

1760: 997: 219: 164: 127: 1269: 1835: 1821: 1775: 1706: 1576: 1553: 1539: 1522: 1498: 1216: 1198: 1184: 1170: 1137: 1047: 981: 912: 856: 807: 705: 673: 644: 559:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

510: 457: 388: 339: 317: 265: 244: 183: 145: 47: 17: 1278: 1741: 1665: 1407: 1364: 985: 953: 922: 901: 877: 803: 796: 434: 421: 281: 1620:

Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!

1208: 747: 1110:? I'm hoping to get some pre-Halloween reviewer interest for this "old dark house" thriller. -- 1684: 1472: 1438: 1240: 782: 764: 719: 694: 678: 473: 452:

a really, really good source that places it in the context of the affair, not D'Olly himself.

350: 98: 1798:? It's also an A-class article, and I think it has a high likelihood of passing FAC. Thanks, 1729: 1497:

from the FAC list, however there has been no bot promotion - there may be a technical issue.

1290: 1898: 1849: 1803: 1756: 1634: 1115: 989: 600: 399: 365: 1293:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1286: 303: 1894: 611:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Rotating locomotion in living systems/archive1

233: 213: 174: 160: 137: 123: 97:

No, you are right, sorry, I missed that ALTNAMES didn't apply to non-common diminutives.

1831: 1817: 1771: 1702: 1661: 1549: 1535: 1516: 1212: 1195: 1180: 1167: 1133: 1106: 1043: 908: 852: 701: 640: 539: 506: 453: 384: 335: 311: 261: 240: 179: 141: 1906: 1853: 1839: 1825: 1807: 1779: 1764: 1710: 1688: 1649: 1636: 1586: 1557: 1543: 1529: 1508: 1480: 1455: 1441: 1410: 1370: 1319: 1248: 1220: 1201: 1188: 1173: 1141: 1119: 1082: 1067: 1051: 1028: 1002: 969: 938: 916: 893: 860: 841: 814: 790: 772: 727: 709: 686: 659: 648: 622: 604: 544: 520: 514: 491: 461: 424:

edit. The text I put came from the D'Oliveira article, but I was surprised to see the

403: 392: 369: 358: 343: 324: 284: 269: 260:

something to the ongoing FAC and hope that it helps. This might take me a day or two.

248: 225: 187: 168: 149: 131: 104: 1737: 1676: 1494: 1403: 718:

could you let me know what else I might need at this point in order to pass the FAC?

636: 446: 430: 299: 291: 277: 1696: 1680: 1434: 1430:

I probably owe apologies to any number of people. But can't apologize to everyone.

1077: 1062: 1036: 1023: 836: 579: 1260: 1363:

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams,

1845: 1813: 1799: 1629: 1236: 1127: 1111: 596: 377: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1394: 499: 1657: 654: 630: 617: 331: 115: 1341:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

1792:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/South China Sea raid/archive1

1297:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1162:

on 25 October 2017 (1 month ago). I know the process times differ, but

203:

variety of fields. To give one example from the current batch of FACs,

1675:

The current one seems more or less done so would you mind if I put up

486: 635:

I'm recusing on that one. Better safe than sorry, I think. I'm sure

1074:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Jack Crossland/archive1

349:

Thank you for the "extremely glamorous England cricket captain"! --

482: 1300:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1156:

on 25 September 2017 (1 month, 23 days ago) and only actually

534: 25: 1614:

We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!

1648: 556:

Hello, Sarastro1. Please check your email; you've got mail!

549: 1716: 1734:

Knowledge (XXG):Today's featured article/February 11, 2018

308:

Knowledge (XXG):Today's featured article/September 3, 2017

1104:, would it be acceptable for me to post a nomination for 1281:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1158: 561: 417: 1239:

and was promoted to FA while there ;) - thank you! --

672:

Hi Sarastro, a couple of weeks ago you archived the

1097:While we wait on any possible further response for 754: 1534:Looks like a glitch. I've asked the bot operator. 1656:...to you and yours, from the Great White North! 1874:Hogwarts Express (Universal Orlando Resort) FAC 8: 1889:is part of the same article series, and the 740: 1891:Hogwarts Express (Universal Orlando Resort) 1235:... to me that an article was mentioned in 1072:I know you'll see it anyway, but I thought 1796:Boeing CH-47 Chinook in Australian service 1351:Sign up here to receive a link to a survey 746: 739: 114:Hello Sarastro1, I've been working on the 802:In response to your revert of my edit on 1453: 1382: 1356:Please be aware this survey will close 1726:Van Diemen's Land v Port Phillip, 1851 1718:Van Diemen's Land v Port Phillip, 1851 832: 828: 779:Van Diemen's Land v Port Phillip, 1851 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1830:Although it's a little academic now! 505:that is perfect for the spot-checks. 7: 1621: 1270:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 653:That's fair, thanks for the reply. — 560: 1883:25 March's Today's featured article 1283:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 998: 412:Re revert of D'Oliveira affair edit 1790:Hi, I'm currently responsible for 1493:Hello Sarastro1, you have removed 1471:goodwill and friendship for all! 1464:Seasonal Greetings and Good Wishes 1424:because I didn't see it that way. 1254:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 639:will be doing a run through soon. 411: 24: 1864:Railway FACs needing final review 298:This is to let you know that the 1786:Permission to start a second FAC 1622: 1606: 1514:It takes a few days to process. 1454: 1383: 1267:Hello, Sarastro1. Voting in the 1259: 1211:have been looked at in the FAC. 1159:posted it on the candidates page 29: 1304:and submit your choices on the 1016:Worcestershire v Somerset, 1979 1009:Worcestershire v Somerset, 1979 1870:Carolwood Pacific Railroad FAC 1231:It has not happened before ... 773:08:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC) 710:09:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC) 687:03:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC) 660:20:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 649:20:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 623:19:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 605:19:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC) 302:article has been scheduled as 1: 1854:21:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC) 1840:13:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC) 1826:11:41, 24 February 2018 (UTC) 1808:07:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC) 1724:This is to let you know that 1666:17:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC) 1637:10:35, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 1587:07:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 1558:20:46, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 1544:18:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 1530:14:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 1509:12:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 1481:23:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 1442:11:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC) 1411:14:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC) 1249:20:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 1221:10:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC) 1202:00:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC) 1189:00:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC) 1174:00:09, 18 November 2017 (UTC) 791:08:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC) 545:11:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 404:08:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC) 393:20:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC) 370:09:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC) 359:06:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC) 1780:22:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC) 1765:18:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC) 1745:16:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC) 1711:23:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1689:23:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1371:21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 1320:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 1142:09:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 1120:22:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 1083:10:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 1068:10:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 1052:10:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC) 1029:19:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 1003:11:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 970:22:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC) 728:22:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 565:at any time by removing the 1358:Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC 939:22:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 917:22:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 894:22:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 861:15:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 842:11:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 815:11:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 521:10:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 515:08:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 492:22:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 479:Scuba Schools International 462:19:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 439:18:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 344:13:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC) 325:13:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 285:12:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 270:02:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 249:21:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 226:00:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 188:12:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC) 110:Considering a FA nomination 1922: 1907:14:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC) 1887:Carolwood Pacific Railroad 1879:Walt Disney World Railroad 1312:MediaWiki message delivery 1056:No worries for the delay. 485:), in addition to being a 276:been doing video games... 169:03:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC) 150:11:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 132:05:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC) 1605: 1460: 1389: 999:Penny for your thoughts? 745: 105:11:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 1730:today's featured article 1644: 529:Would you be interested? 304:today's featured article 198:FAC and current athletes 1599:Merry Christmas to all! 1148:1962 Tour de France FAC 426:Basil D'Oliveira Trophy 1728:has been scheduled as 1653: 1327:ANI Experiences survey 554: 1652: 1447:Bittersweet greetings 1279:Arbitration Committee 1132:That's fine with me. 590:Barge of the Dead FAC 553: 42:of past discussions. 1433:So anyhow. Cheers. 1365:Patrick Earley (WMF) 1336:can be found here: 1166:lasted four months! 827:(From the article): 777:Thank you today for 736:Precious five years! 535:this campaign launch 157:Martin Flanagan said 1881:is scheduled to be 982:Manchester Cenotaph 742: 674:Balfour Declaration 173:Just a note to let 120:list of FAC mentors 18:User talk:Sarastro1 1654: 1645:Seasons' Greetings 1295:arbitration policy 986:Mells War Memorial 804:Learie Constantine 797:Learie Constantine 562:remove this notice 555: 1720:scheduled for TFA 1642: 1641: 1486: 1485: 1416: 1415: 1376:Happy Saturnalia! 823:talk page stalker 761: 760: 474:Underwater diving 422:D'Oliveira affair 294:scheduled for TFA 90: 89: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1913: 1904: 1901: 1700: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1610: 1603: 1602: 1584: 1579: 1578:William Harris • 1527: 1519: 1506: 1501: 1500:William Harris • 1458: 1451: 1450: 1387: 1380: 1379: 1263: 1161: 1131: 1100:The Fountainhead 1080: 1065: 1040: 1026: 1000: 994: 905: 839: 826: 812: 750: 743: 698: 634: 586: 584: 578: 574: 568: 564: 552: 537:. All the best. 503: 468:Just a quick FYI 450: 381: 322: 237: 222: 216: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1902: 1899: 1895:Central Florida 1866: 1788: 1752: 1722: 1694: 1673: 1647: 1630: 1623: 1601: 1582: 1577: 1523: 1517: 1504: 1499: 1491: 1449: 1421: 1378: 1329: 1324: 1323: 1264: 1256: 1233: 1157: 1152:It created the 1150: 1125: 1095: 1078: 1063: 1034: 1024: 1012: 990: 977: 949: 899: 873: 837: 820: 808: 800: 738: 692: 670: 628: 614: 592: 587: 582: 576: 572: 570:You've got mail 566: 558: 550: 531: 497: 470: 444: 414: 375: 318: 296: 257: 231: 220: 214: 200: 112: 95: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1919: 1917: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1751: 1748: 1721: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1672: 1669: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1639: 1617: 1616: 1611: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1467: 1466: 1461: 1459: 1448: 1445: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1413: 1399: 1398: 1390: 1388: 1377: 1374: 1354: 1353: 1344: 1343: 1328: 1325: 1302:the candidates 1265: 1258: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1232: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1094: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1011: 1006: 976: 973: 948: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 872: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 845: 844: 799: 794: 759: 758: 752: 751: 737: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 715: 669: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 613: 608: 591: 588: 557: 548: 530: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 469: 466: 465: 464: 413: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 347: 346: 295: 289: 288: 287: 256: 255:Jill Valentine 253: 252: 251: 199: 196: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 111: 108: 94: 91: 88: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1918: 1909: 1908: 1905: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1875: 1871: 1863: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1749: 1747: 1746: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1719: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1698: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1677:James K. Polk 1670: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1651: 1638: 1635: 1633: 1619: 1618: 1615: 1612: 1609: 1604: 1598: 1588: 1585: 1580: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1502: 1496: 1495:Golden jackal 1489:Golden jackal 1488: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1462: 1457: 1452: 1446: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1436: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1418: 1412: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1375: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1366: 1361: 1359: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1262: 1253: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1230: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1129: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1103: 1101: 1092: 1084: 1081: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1059: 1058:The Cricketer 1055: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1038: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1022:that summer! 1021: 1017: 1010: 1007: 1005: 1004: 1001: 995: 993: 987: 983: 974: 972: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 954:Mike Christie 946: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 923:Mike Christie 920: 919: 918: 914: 910: 903: 902:Mike Christie 898: 897: 896: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 878:Mike Christie 871: 868: 862: 858: 854: 849: 848: 847: 846: 843: 840: 834: 830: 824: 819: 818: 817: 816: 813: 811: 805: 798: 795: 793: 792: 788: 784: 780: 775: 774: 770: 766: 757: 753: 749: 744: 735: 729: 725: 721: 716: 713: 712: 711: 707: 703: 696: 691: 690: 689: 688: 684: 680: 675: 667: 661: 658: 657: 652: 651: 650: 646: 642: 638: 632: 627: 626: 625: 624: 621: 620: 612: 609: 607: 606: 602: 598: 589: 581: 571: 563: 547: 546: 543: 541: 536: 528: 522: 518: 517: 516: 512: 508: 501: 496: 495: 494: 493: 488: 484: 480: 475: 467: 463: 459: 455: 448: 443: 442: 441: 440: 436: 432: 427: 423: 419: 405: 401: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 379: 374: 373: 372: 371: 367: 361: 360: 356: 352: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 328: 327: 326: 323: 321: 315: 314: 309: 305: 301: 300:Percy Chapman 293: 292:Percy Chapman 290: 286: 283: 279: 274: 273: 272: 271: 267: 263: 254: 250: 246: 242: 235: 230: 229: 228: 227: 223: 217: 209: 206: 197: 189: 185: 181: 176: 172: 171: 170: 166: 162: 158: 153: 152: 151: 147: 143: 139: 136: 135: 134: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 109: 107: 106: 103: 100: 92: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1867: 1789: 1753: 1723: 1674: 1655: 1613: 1524: 1515: 1492: 1473:Brianboulton 1463: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1392: 1362: 1357: 1355: 1345: 1334: 1330: 1305: 1299: 1276: 1268: 1266: 1241:Gerda Arendt 1234: 1151: 1105: 1099: 1096: 1057: 1019: 1013: 991: 978: 950: 874: 809: 801: 783:Gerda Arendt 776: 765:Gerda Arendt 762: 720:Onceinawhile 714:Hi Sarastro, 695:Onceinawhile 679:Onceinawhile 671: 655: 618: 615: 593: 538: 532: 471: 415: 362: 351:Gerda Arendt 348: 319: 312: 297: 258: 210: 201: 113: 96: 78: 43: 37: 1757:LittleJerry 1307:voting page 1209:FA criteria 1164:my last FLC 1093:FAC Request 992:HJ Mitchell 907:like that. 756:Five years! 533:Please see 320:talk to me? 36:This is an 1844:Thank you 1814:No problem 1658:FWiW Bzuk 1395:Saturnalia 1291:topic bans 1154:nomination 234:Giants2008 215:Giants2008 175:HappyWaldo 161:HappyWaldo 138:HappyWaldo 124:HappyWaldo 85:Archive 15 79:Archive 14 73:Archive 13 68:Archive 12 60:Archive 10 1287:site bans 1213:Sarastro1 1181:Sarastro1 1134:Sarastro1 1044:Sarastro1 1020:The Times 909:Sarastro1 853:Sarastro1 702:Sarastro1 641:Sarastro1 585:template. 507:Sarastro1 454:Sarastro1 400:talk page 385:Sarastro1 366:talk page 336:Sarastro1 313:Jimfbleak 262:Finetooth 241:Sarastro1 180:Sarastro1 142:Sarastro1 116:Tom Wills 1900:Jackdude 1872:and the 1832:Sarastro 1818:Sarastro 1772:Sarastro 1738:Ealdgyth 1703:Sarastro 1583:(talk) • 1550:Sarastro 1536:Sarastro 1505:(talk) • 1404:Ealdgyth 962:contribs 931:contribs 886:contribs 870:Unlocked 810:Mountain 741:Precious 637:Ian Rose 447:DadaNeem 431:DadaNeem 330:Thanks. 278:Ealdgyth 205:this one 93:ALTNAMES 1750:Bat FAC 1697:Wehwalt 1681:Wehwalt 1435:Lingzhi 1107:The Bat 1079:Harrias 1064:Harrias 1037:Harrias 1025:Harrias 966:library 935:library 890:library 838:Harrias 668:Balfour 102:Snowman 39:archive 1885:. The 1846:Nick-D 1800:Nick-D 1631:Ssven2 1439:(talk) 1419:Sorry! 1393:Happy 1128:RL0919 1112:RL0919 597:Aoba47 487:NITROX 420:of my 418:revert 378:Jhall1 1518:ceran 1237:a DYK 1199:Boris 1171:Boris 947:Sonic 500:Atsme 99:Giant 16:< 1868:The 1850:talk 1836:talk 1822:talk 1804:talk 1776:talk 1761:talk 1742:Talk 1707:talk 1685:talk 1671:Polk 1662:talk 1554:talk 1540:talk 1525:thor 1477:talk 1408:Talk 1368:talk 1316:talk 1277:The 1245:talk 1217:talk 1196:Bald 1185:talk 1168:Bald 1138:talk 1116:talk 1048:talk 958:talk 927:talk 913:talk 882:talk 857:talk 831:and 787:talk 769:talk 724:talk 706:talk 683:talk 656:swpb 645:talk 631:Swpb 619:swpb 601:talk 540:Jack 511:talk 483:NAUI 481:and 472:Re: 458:talk 435:talk 389:talk 355:talk 340:talk 332:Dank 282:Talk 266:talk 245:talk 221:Talk 184:talk 165:talk 146:talk 128:talk 1903:101 1679:?-- 1102:FAC 975:FAC 964:- 933:- 888:- 580:ygm 575:or 1852:) 1838:) 1824:) 1806:) 1778:) 1763:) 1740:- 1736:. 1709:) 1687:) 1664:) 1628:— 1556:) 1542:) 1479:) 1437:♦ 1406:- 1360:. 1318:) 1310:. 1289:, 1247:) 1219:) 1187:) 1140:) 1118:) 1050:) 996:| 968:) 960:- 937:) 929:- 915:) 892:) 884:- 859:) 789:) 771:) 763:-- 726:) 708:) 685:) 647:) 603:) 583:}} 577:{{ 573:}} 567:{{ 542:| 513:) 460:) 437:) 402:) 391:) 368:) 357:) 342:) 316:- 280:- 268:) 247:) 224:) 186:) 167:) 148:) 130:) 64:← 1848:( 1834:( 1820:( 1802:( 1774:( 1759:( 1705:( 1699:: 1695:@ 1683:( 1660:( 1552:( 1538:( 1475:( 1314:( 1243:( 1215:( 1183:( 1136:( 1130:: 1126:@ 1114:( 1046:( 1039:: 1035:@ 956:( 925:( 911:( 904:: 900:@ 880:( 855:( 825:) 821:( 785:( 767:( 722:( 704:( 697:: 693:@ 681:( 643:( 633:: 629:@ 599:( 509:( 502:: 498:@ 456:( 449:: 445:@ 433:( 398:( 387:( 380:: 376:@ 353:( 338:( 264:( 243:( 236:: 232:@ 218:( 182:( 163:( 144:( 126:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index