User talk:Sdrqaz/Archive 1 - Knowledge (XXG)

3106:. However, Joe Lieberman and Angus King are truly centrist figures who voted with both Democrats and Republicans (both were former Democrats who either left the party on their own or were ousted from the party). In the case of Joe Lieberman, he lost Connecticut's 2006 Democratic Senate Primary to Ned Lamont (who's the current Governor of Connecticut). After losing the Democratic Primary, Lieberman ran as an Independent, and won re-election largely from the support of Republican voters in the 2006 General Election. With that being said, I'm thinking it would not be correct to call the majority Senate caucus in either the 110th or 117th Congresses the Democratic caucus; rather simply the "Majority Caucus" since the caucus is not made up entirely of Democrats. Now, if 51 (50 with Harris as VP) Senate seats were held by actual members of the Democratic Party, I could see the majority caucus being called the "Democratic Caucus" since they would hold an outright majority in the chamber without the need for non-Democrat Senators to join their caucus to form a majority. Indeed, you're correct in there are no real good examples of "coalition" caucuses in Congress throughout our country's history. However, they have occurred several times in state legislatures, most recently in Washington State where a few moderate Democrats in the state Senate caucused with Republicans to create what was called the " 5131:

curiosity is not a good enough reason to ask a question at RfA, any more than it would be during any other 24/7 high-stress period in a person's life.Candidates disregarding questions puts the onus, along with all the risk, on the candidate. I've seen comments made about candidates ignoring a question, calling it disrespectful. Candidates already have enough on their plate. I'm trying to take some of that onus and risk off their plate, along with the stress caused by answering irrelevant questions.I don't actually consider the question of recall irrelevant. I've recently argued we should make it the fourth question, or suggest to candidates that they include it as part of their acceptance statement, just to get it out of the way so that's one less question to deal with. I don't consider any question about understanding of policy in the areas you intend to work to be irrelevant. I don't consider any question that asks a candidate to address an actual area of concern

5020:, no worries on the delay, feel free to drop in and out!I don't know why people insist on asking irrelevant questions at RfA. I suspect it's a combination of reasons. Some see that everyone can ask up to 2 and start trying to come up with questions. Some probably think it's a good way to raise their own profile. Some are just feeding their own egos/want to hear their voice. Some are asking questions that would seem nosy if simply posted on a user talk but because other people are asking questions they feel more comfortable.I comment on irrelevant questions because I hope it will help limit the number of irrelevant questions at future RfAs. I did, FWIW, go to that editor's page first and give her a link to 898:, thanks for getting back to me. It's just that previously that page had integrated the offices as one piece of information so the role was Minister of State for Middle East & North Africa instead of Minister for Middle East & North Africa, Minister of State. I had followed this format because it seemed more concise as it coalesced the information into a single piece. Also I'd like to clarify what you mean when you write that you want to put rank and appointment first. Obviously rank means Secretary of State, Minister of State etc but what do you mean by appointment?I'd also like to agree with you on how it's been difficult to find information. I've been using 5141:

morning.Some candidates don't mind answering these 'Life, the Universe and Everything' questions. I don't feel like the current candidate minded it. That doesn't make the question relevant, and it doesn't mean that some future candidate, asked the same question, might not be completely flummoxed by it and spend literally hours trying to figure out how to answer it, and for what? What possible answer could make the difference between supporting and opposing? And that's IMO the only good reason to ask a question at RfA: because if you don't get this concern answered, you can't support.Sorry to be so long-winded. It's fine if we just have to agree to disagree. :)

3128:), so I've learned something new. I was, however, aware of the electoral histories of Sens. Lieberman, Sanders, and King. I was not claiming that they are registered as Democrats, but they were part of the Democratic caucus. In most reliable sources, they are described as being "independents caucusing with the Democrats" or something along those lines. I agree that a coalition down the line can happen (never say never in politics), but I fail to see how this can be accurately described as being one. Your examples of the state legislatures seem to involve politicians crossing party lines to join a coalition 3048:

consistent. Either we add "coalition" to the senate majority in the 117th United States Congress, or we eliminate "coalition" from the 110th United States Congress. It's important to note the Democratic caucus' majorities for both congressional sessions were predicated upon the same conditions: Democrats did not have enough seats to constitute a majority in and of themselves; their "majority" was only made possible with two Independent senators agreeing to align with their caucus. Therefore, I would argue that the majority caucuses in the 110th and 117th Congresses is and were truly multiparty coalitions.

4580:

Sorry about my commentary on "True and the Rainbow Kingdom" I know I was being honest about the show, but instead it was un-encylopedic and didn't conform to Knowledge (XXG)'s standards. 😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😿😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸 Sorry about the laughing kitties. I definitely WAS NOT MOCKING YOU.

2893:, I hope that you haven't felt that your concerns have been ignored and if that is what you feel, I hope that your perception of the closure is not changed because of it. I am considering rewriting the summary on the basis of your objections, but the core finding of consensus is unchanged and I have found no need to do so. In a way, my comments on editor conduct in the RfC were peripheral to the actual thrust of the RfC: whether the source should be deprecated. I was taken aback by comments such as accusing editors of wanting to 1025:, I am most grateful for your notification that the article is up for deletion and have contributed to the discussion accordingly. Although I am certain that you are a far more experienced user of Knowledge (XXG) than I, it seems like the discussion has gotten slightly personal and perhaps uncivil. I think it would be conducive to the health of the discussion that we refrain from engaging in incivility when discussing matters with fellow users who, like you and I, simply want what is best for Knowledge (XXG) at large. 5033:. It's fine that you think it's the wrong way to go, though, and I'd love to discuss what you think might be a better way. Because I don't actually enjoy being kind of a dick. I just feel like someone's got to do something about this stupid questions that in some cases cause actual harm, and this is what I came up with. You may notice that I do not typically comment on opposes, no matter how silly those are. My little niche is silly, irrelevant questions. :D 3905: 741:, nothing else. If months are involved, there should be spaces, e.g. October 1897 – February 1904. In the latter example, there could be a non-breaking space, but not in the former example.Please read through the guideline again, paying particular attention to the examples, before you continue. Or it will be too much for other editors to correct.Thank you. (If you want to answer, please do it here to keep the conversation in one place.) 3110:" from 2012 to 2017. Similar arrangements took place since 2000 in the New York Senate and in the New Mexico Senate (dubbed the "Cowboy Coalition," made up of Republicans and conservative rural Democrats creating a coalition majority caucus, leaving minority caucus consisting of more progressive urban/suburban Democrats). Just because a "coalition caucus" hasn't happened in the US Congress doesn't mean it can't happen. 2593: 1929: 965: 3404: 2545: 560: 4459: 4057: 3958: 3665: 5238: 31: 5178:. I can sympathise with the idea of encouraging a candidate to get it out of the way, given that recall is one of the perennial questions, but I don't see it as anywhere near as important as declarations regarding alternate accounts or paid editing. As a result, I don't believe it is as crucial to knowing whether to support a candidate. While 3623:. This is a topic that interests me as well, and if you would like, I would be happy to help flesh out the draft and get it into mainspace. I don't want to step on your toes, however, as it seems like you have a plan for writing the article already, so I'd also be happy to step back and let you take the lead. All the best, 5062:. Prior to that, well, I had never interacted with any of the candidates, so I didn't consider myself qualified to !vote on them. And I sometimes still have that feeling. Despite what others may consider to be the leading nature of the question (most people asking about recall want the candidate to be open to it – shown 2857:, I'd rather not list users and diffs because the RfC is now closed. However, I recognise your point that many criticisms were not explicitly directed towards the proposer. I was uncomfortable with some of the ways in which editors were dismissive, given that formal deprecation requires going through the RfC process. 5028:

was crucial to knowing whether to support their candidacy or not. IMO that's just horsefeathers. Seriously, what could any reasonable candidate possibly say that would be a "wrong" answer and make the questioner decide against supporting?So, yeah, I'm going to comment, because for me, I can't come up

3767:

I'm surprised something like that's been on your mind for a while but don't worry about it, it's all good. I learned something new in the process too. I didn't feel slighted by the phrasing at the time, I understood what you meant after a back and forth talk so I didn't think badly of the intended or

3484:

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, it's not required but it sure would be helpful if you didn't accept additions to day of year pages

2937:

of the RfC (amended on 21 January)? As I have pointed out, the comment on tone and tenor was peripheral to the core finding of consensus. Yes, there is no requirement to deprecate sources, but since an RfC has been offered in good faith, editors may as well !vote on the issue.I am also baffled by the

3101:

The bone of contention here is whether the two Independent senators in the 110th and 117th Congresses were Democrats. Based on party affiliation, Joe Lieberman, Bernie Sanders, and Angus King are not members of the Democratic Party. It's well known where Bernie Sanders sits on the issues; he proudly

3070:

that refers to the Democratic majority as a "coalition"? Knowledge (XXG) is built on what reliable sources say, not what we want them to say. If my understanding of political coalitions is correct, coalitions are formed for the purpose of creating a majority. Given that Sens. Lieberman, Sanders, and

879:

for example was a Min State (I believe) for Defence Procurement, then Harriet Baldwin took the appointment but as a PUSS. It switches in every reshuffle. Feel free to rank them accordingly but I think it's best to show both rank and appointment and commons first, lords last. I'm not an expert on the

615:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

3337:

It seems that what I said was not clear to you. the current website for the International relation of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames doesn't recognize Jaffna as a twin city. It may or may not have ever been recognized as such. that is the reason I deleted the information. not because the

2915:

I think you could have taken that up with JayBeeEll rather than bring it to your closing summary. I don't find it logical for you to support RfCs because they're required to deprecated sources when the point is that there's no requirement to deprecate sources, so will object that you are "involved"

2871:

Criticism directed towards the proposer can be criticism of the proposition not of the proposer, so I don't see whom you refer to and I believe that the word "dismissive" could be applied to the act of discarding criticisms. But "implied refusal to seriously consider or discuss an objection" merely

5115:

for you, as you're a lot more invested in RfA reform than I am. If that path is unacceptable (as I assume it is), perhaps just prodding the questioner once would suffice. If the questioner gets it, great! If not, well maybe a seed has been planted for the future. Disengage. Trying to ram the point

2046:

If you're making edits and they're being reverted and you revert them back, that is reverting back to your preferred version, because, well, you prefer that version. You need to provide evidence that it is "edited propaganda". You're removing information that is sourced to books and other sources;

4997:

as trolling. Just as how being an administrator isn't just about memorising all the policies, questions at RfA aren't just about policy knowledge – they're also about trying to get a feel for the candidate and their temperament and !voters have strange ways of trying to suss that out. Having been

4373:

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I believe this could be covered with regular expressions, even if they just indicate likely candidates. Tuning can then reduce false positives. If you can grab some examples you come across (article links would be fine) and put them in your sandbox that would

2269:

It's noon sharp in Washington D.C. or do we now wait for noon for every Congressional district? You could argue that it isn't settled law by that alone. They represent narrow constituencies after all, not the entire country, and the constitution is tight-lipped about that. This isn't me seriously

2083:

Well, obviously we both have preferred versions. But I'm not the one who has edited it seven times in less than a day. I'm not sure what you mean by editing it when it was factual; I've not edited the page before today. I'm also not sure what you mean when you claim that I said Jashari killed his

848:

page. The rank of the posts that they were appointed to had been kept in the previous edits and I don't understand the logic behind not having the ministers in rank order (so Secretary of State, Minister of State, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State). Please enlighten me regarding this matter.

3261:

country prepares to sever its ties with the European Union, Kingston has found itself a new Asian partner in the form of the Sri Lankan city Jaffna. Kingston Council has announced it is twinning with the city in a bid to build “greater understanding and sharing knowledge” in areas of governance,

1830:

Hi you commented that an edited to Aksel Rykkvins Knowledge (XXG) seemed strange and not neutral? I am not sure why you think this . Aksel has been studying singing with Matthew Mark Marriott each week since early 2019 . Matthew is now Aksels main teacher. So it seemed natural for this important

5130:

Yes, I know some people take pleasure from being contrarian. I was hoping this editor was just clueless, as she hasn't got a ton of edits, which is why I posted to her talk. If she'd had 30K edits I might not have bothered. Curiosity is quite possibly a reason people ask questions at RfA, but

4550:

is sitting at 26 May, with quite a few even older than it. I suppose that's one of the issues with an all-volunteer community: it's highly dependent on whether editors have the time to spare. Personally, ALT6 and ALT7 seem the most exciting ones and probably have the greatest chances of being

3047:

I respectfully disagree with your reasoning on eliminating "coalition" from the senate majority in the 117th United States Congress. If you look at the page for the 110th United States Congress, you'll see that it does have the Senate majority listed as a Democratic (coalition). We need to be

2433:

You removed my changes on the page Symbiosis. I did not provide a new reference as the references already there are actually saying what I wrote. They had been badly summarized before, it was confusing. You can check this by reading the references. Also, what I wrote is on this wikipedia page

2098:

This shouldn't be based off of "preferred" versions. It should be based off of facts. That's what was edited it - a claim that Adem killed his own family. His niece had an interview telling what actually happened. But you have also reverted it back several times in a day to false information.

1532:

It was my pleasure! A word of warning: political pages on Knowledge (XXG) can get a little hectic and so can be a bit of a 'baptism by fire'. If your edits can undone, don't panic! It's completely natural and will happen. Don't fall in the trap of undoing their revert; that would be viewed as

5140:

over almost every question, spending hours thinking about them, composing answers to them, editing those answers, trying to figure out if there's a catch or gotcha in them, worrying they aren't answering fast enough but wanting to sleep on an answer to try to see if they can do better in the

1552:

I figured that would be the case with political pages, and thankfully I expected that reality. I have recently been attempting to improve my ability to put aside initial irrational emotion in the case of a political disagreement, so it should be smooth sailing. Thanks again for the advice!

4551:

approved, though you never know. I'd suggest looking at the nomination page every couple of days, but be patient! A reviewer will eventually come, make suggestions, and give feedback. I'll keep an eye on that nomination to see if I can help when that happens (though I'm no expert at DYK).

2061:

It's your preferred version. Why did you edit the original Adem Jashari wikipedia page when it was factual? Saying he killed his own family when the sole survivor, Besarta Jashari, went on BBC explaining what the Serb army did. That's the first example of you providing false information.

3642:. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you; I take quite a while composing messages. Thanks for the kind offer and for adding the template to the draft. I'm surprised by your interest, since the shadow docket is quite an obscure concept! Obviously, you're free to edit the page ( 4868:

I did see that request, but since that editor replied I thought he'd be doing the review instead of me. Because I don't want to step on any toes (unnecessarily, that is), I'll prod them a bit on the talk page. If they don't respond within the next few days, I'll do the review.

5135:

to be irrelevant. But unless you have a specific concern, backed up by something in their editing history, that this person's "editing philosophy" might be problematic for some reason, why do you need to put them through that exercise? Speaking from experience some candidates

2933:, I did take it up with JBL following my close, and we had quite a pleasant discussion. The role of the closer is to summarise what happened in the discussion. I felt that I was well within my rights to say that there was "some criticism of the proposer". Have you read the 4253:

Hi, I saw your post on the AWB talk page. Do you have an example of what you are looking for? What you might want to search for? I have some methods of getting around some AWB limitations. If anything comes of this discussion we can post on the AWB page. Regards,

988: 1723:

from the Blackstone talk page: "All of this is in the larger context of climate change. This is encyclopedically significant because deforesting the Amazon is a direct threat to human welfare, so this should also be at least clearly indicated or directly mentioned."

2380:

I see: thank you for providing me with a source. I have reverted myself and have struck through my notice on your page. Sorry for the misjudgement; the use of unusually-placed upper- and lower-case letters in the same word is usually a tell-tale sign of vandalism.

796:

Hi! Thanks for your edits of the article on Lord Porter. I just wanted to point out that in England & Wales at least (apparently it's not the case in New Zealand) judges drop the QC after name upon appointment to the bench. Many thanks again for your edits!

991:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3646:

etc), but I'd prefer to potter along and work on it for now, if you don't mind.I am, however, maybe thinking of putting it up for GA some time down the line (wishful thinking, perhaps) and would love to pick your brains and get your expertise on the matter.

2797:

Hi Sdrqaz, I just wanted to drop a quick thank-you for closing the RFC finally. I know it was probably quite a bit to read through; I never imagined when I filed it that I'd wind up so personally and abusively attacked just for filing a required procedure.

2300:

In all statutes, orders, rules, and regulations relating to the time of performance of any act... it shall be understood and intended that the time shall insofar as practicable... be the United States standard time of the zone within which the act is to be

5170:). Candidates are indeed in a bit of a bind: refuse questions and get opposes from questioners and their friends, or answer and maybe slip up in their wording. Hmm. Something for me to ponder, thank you. I daresay that a candidate brave enough to refuse 4927:

Hey, Sdrqaz. RfA is an incredibly stressful experience. I don't see that you've run one under this user name, but it's not something that needs extra questions. From the point of view of someone who hasn't run one, it's hard to understand how stressful

2120:

I completely agree that it should be based on facts. But you are removing sourced information and replacing it with information that is not sourced. In the eyes of Knowledge (XXG), that is not basing information off the facts: the very opposite (see

4541:

It was a pleasure! It's a shame than non-autoconfirmed editors can't create DYK nominations themselves, and it's a nice, thorough article you've created there. I don't think there's much to do other than to wait, to be honest. The backlog at

3824:

I believe that the addition of the reference was an attempt at self promotion of one of the authors of the article.By looking at the history of that article you can see that the reference was unnecessary. This is not the first time that

3136:. They have effectively been subsumed into the caucus: they are Democrats in all but name. I reiterate my point above: we need reliable sources that refer to the Senate majorities in the 110th and 117th Congresses as being coalitions. 2520:! You're the only one who noticed :( I cringe when I think back to the edits made when I was starting out...This coincidence is a sign, I'm sure of it, of... something? Happy (real) birthday; I hope you had a good start to 2021! 4030:

I just wanted to appologize for making my prank edit on Joe Manchins page and wasting your time having to review it and revert it back. I am sure that is as annoying to you as it was unneccesary for me to do. Enjoy your day.

1706:

Hello. You reverted my edit to Blackstone Group - following their PR team previously reverting the edits. Blackstone have a history of paying Knowledge (XXG) editors to manage their listing and remove anything they don't like.

5029:

with a better way to try to show people that irrelevant questions are looked at sideways by at least some other editors. And not only are they harmful to the process, they make the questioner look clueless. Other people are

3480:

All new additions to the DOY pages without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and backed this edit out.

5166:, though I still prefer a response like "I decline to answer this question" over ignoring it (some candidates answer questions in strange orders instead of going through them chronologically, so it's not a nice feeling for 3730:! You saved me having to flesh out my reasoning further and captured how arbitrary the restrictions are, given how the identical discussion held in a different venue would be prohibited just because of where it took place. 2250:

Knowledge (XXG) does not say that something has happened when it has not happened yet. That is not what it does. If it is early by an hour or early by a year, it is still too early. Moreover, please read Section One of the

3323:. I suspect that you have quite a few contributions where you removed information simply because the link was dead and would advise you to go back and do so, so that valuable information is not lost from Knowledge (XXG). 5110:

has a lot on such views).As for what I think is the optimal approach, I don't have the perfect answer. My own approach (letting the candidate disregard any questions they don't want to answer) is a probably a little too

4311:), searching for QWQ violations would throw up a lot of perfectly-valid uses of bold and italic. Searching the rendered text wouldn't have the same problem, as Ctrl-F doesn't look for things like italics. As I said at 4963:. However, just as I believe that badgering opposers is rarely helpful, haranguing !voters who ask what you may consider stupid questions isn't that helpful either, especially when the question has been answered and 2127:

The only survivor was Besarta Jashari, Hamëz Jashari's daughter. She claimed that the policemen had "threatened her with a knife and ordered her to say that her uncle (Adem Jashari) had killed everyone who wanted to

3264:

I do not understand where the confusion is, as it is quite clear that it has been twinned. Even if the government link had been broken beyond repair, the newspaper source would have sufficed. Please revert your own

661:

I realise that this is many years too late a reply, but I did not want your advice to be left without a response. Thank you for your advice and I have incorporated it into my subsequent edits (since 2016, not since

995:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2270:

arguing that we should do that but one could make the case based on that. Individual pages for these various politicians had already been edited to reflect expired terms before I started my edits on that page. --

2189:, as I pointed out on your talk page and as it says in your quote, it is a general principle. To my mind, creating an RfC does not count as "communicating with others" in the conventional sense on talk pages and 874:

which are the responsibilities they hold. Under those pages, they show the post holder, regardless if they were PUSS or Min of State. Those holding these appointments for example, can alternate or be promoted.

1853:

Hi there. I was just slightly concerned because you added "internationally acclaimed" to it. I've seen that you re-added the information without that, so that's fine. Do you have a source for this information?

1653:

Hi, I would like to explain that every chromebook in my school has the same IP address, and that it's likely that only one person actually made the unconstructive edits, and no one else actually did anything.

4273:, thanks for the message. Necessary disclaimer: I'm pretty weak on the technical side of the encyclopaedia, so there's probably a blindingly obvious solution. A little bit of context as well: my last run of 5098:, and have certainly opposed for those reasons. I can't read the !voter's mind, but perhaps that was part of the reason why the question was asked. Maybe the !voter wanted to know if the candidate was more 3083:. The independent senators have been effectively subsumed into the Democratic Caucus. Moreover, it cannot be called "multiparty" as independents do not belong to another party. The Senate Democratic Caucus 1537:

by some users and might get you banned. Instead, open up a dialogue with them either on their talk page or on the article's talk page. I hope that was clear! If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask me!

2691: 1207: 3859:; thanks for letting me know and sorry for the late response. It was difficult to tell that it was your intention because you didn't include an edit summary with your removal. If you feel an editor has a 4227: 2954:

deprecated, that does not preclude going through the formal deprecation process. If you wish to take my future closures of RfCs up to a higher authority, you will be well within your rights to do so.

3550:

Hi Sdrqaz, On the page where I can see my edit count, I noticed a category called User Group (which is empty in my case). Could you tell me what those are and how I can become a member? Best wishes

4568: 4547: 4139: 3179:

Hi, I work for Blackstone. I see you were recently active at the Blackstone article and appear to have a good sense of how to apply the NPOV policy. Can you please take a look at the discussion at

1138:"BREAKING: Republican David Valadao wins election to U.S. House in California's 21st Congressional District, beating incumbent Rep. TJ Cox. #APracecall at 10:32 a.m. PST. #Election2020 #CAelection" 2699: 1673:

so that if your school's IP address is blocked again, you can continue editing. If you plan on just using Knowledge (XXG) to read pages, you wouldn't (to my knowledge) be affected by such a block.

4300:

I cannot make AWB differentiate between apostrophes and italic/bold markup. As many QWQ changes involve changing two inverted commas into one single inverted comma and one double inverted comma (

4107: 4038: 2676: 2396: 2366: 1954:

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

1605: 5116:

home may just cause the proverbial seed to be destroyed beyond repair and may only cause more drama. Some people take pleasure from being contrarian and that may become more likely as a result.

1669:

I understand. Unfortunately, other editors cannot differentiate between the different people using that IP address in New York. If you plan on making edits to Knowledge (XXG), I'd advise you to

1806:

people have used against me on Knowledge (XXG) and that certainly made the cut. Who would've thought that monitoring recent changes would lead to more insults? Anyways, thank you very much

972: 956: 3442: 3251:. I added the archived URL to the page. You should not remove broken links and the information they supported without checking if the link had been archived.The council page states this: 1810:

and likewise to you too! It's been quite remarkable how prolific you've been in half a year and I have greatly enjoyed working with you and hope to continue doing so in 2021.Best wishes,

1763: 1711: 4932:

can be. It's 24/7 for an entire week, and it can go horribly wrong. Unless your question actually is necessary for you to make a decision, it's actively harmful to the process IMO.

3071:

King have caucused with the Democrats throughout their time in the Senate, the Democratic caucus is not considered a formal coalition in the usual senses of the term. This was not an

1779::) Hope you have a wonderful holiday season (if you celebrate any or all of the relevant holidays!) and a wonderful new year. It's been great working with you these past few months. 116:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge (XXG). If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place 3248: 3080: 2673: 1397: 1169: 3132:. This is not the case with the aforementioned senators. They did not leave the Democratic caucus after they were not needed. They did not have a coalition agreement, unlike the 2711:

Indeed, her resignation from the US Senate doesn't take effect until Noon EST, on 18 January 2021. But, trying to make that stick, is like spitting up against the Niagara Falls.

2252: 2979: 2934: 5175: 3954:

for the barnstar (and sorry for the late reply)! I didn't realise that there was something tracking it; just tried to chip away at that eternal backlog every once in a while.

3661:

Heh, that's what I thought too—you can imagine my surprise when I discovered someone else had already started a draft for the topic. As I said, I'm happy to leave you to it.

2228:

Half an hour isn't really too early, and their terms expire today in any event. And if it isn't really settled law at what exact minute they expire, it's hardly inaccurate.--

136:

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Knowledge (XXG), you might want to consider being "

2291:

It is very clearly Washington, DC. I don't think anyone has ever seriously called for the president's inauguration to be delayed until noon is reached in Hawaii. Moreover,

3589:(30 days old and 500 edits).All in all, I wouldn't worry too much about those things. Few pages are semi-protected, and even fewer are extended-confirmed protected. After 4774:, after all. Given that the information was taken directly from the books, the data from the pages you lost is still available on Google Books and should be retrievable. 4223: 252: 4042: 2680: 2400: 2370: 1609: 5095: 5066:), that's not what I was looking for. I wanted to see his thought process and how the candidate justified himself. For me, my question didn't have to do with being a 5021: 2773:

I probably won't make the edits myself, but allowing others to do them sounds like a good idea in the long run. At the end of the day, it's a website, after all.

5107: 2938:

commitment to object to my subsequent closures. I do not blindly support all deprecation RfCs. I am merely repeating what is the process for formal deprecation:

2024:

Adem Jashari edits are not my "preferred" version. Knowledge (XXG) is full of edited propaganda and his page is a hot spot for Serbs to commit their brainwash.

3279:

There is such only in the archive; no present evidence cannot be found on the website. It will be valid only if the present website claims that, but it doesn't

2948:

the only effect of deprecation alone is to explicitly codify the source’s pre-existing status, as already determined by Knowledge (XXG)’s sourcing requirements.

2358: 5219: 5211: 4964: 3408: 3124:

Thanks for the thorough answer. I'll admit to not knowing about the situations in Washington state, New York, and New Mexico (I assume you're referring to the

4908:

article about the Politics section. You've been so helpful reviewing this draft, so I hope you're able to take a look at the last two requests. Thanks again!

737:

Hello again.I'm afraid you've misread MOS:DATERANGE above. There should be no spaces – non-breaking or otherwise – in year ranges. Year ranges should be like

4191: 2625: 5091: 5055: 4801: 977: 574:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 4956: 4526:

I really appreciate the assist at DYK. I've added sources to the nomination form. Please let me know if there's anything else I need to do. Thanks again!

5183: 296: 145: 4315:, I'm using a pretty conservative program so fewer false positives are thrown up, but that also means "true" positives are falling through the cracks. 3013:

That comparison does not hold up because there was no change in President of the Senate or President pro tempore in that Congress. If you look at the

1712:

https://www.warren.senate.gov/oversight/letters/warren-colleagues-examine-role-of-private-equity-firm-blackstone-in-deforestation-of-amazon-rainforest

1598:

Cameroon Under Paul Biya Joins Iran Nicaragua North Korea Syria and Venezuela as a Rouge State Because they Restrict Human Rights on its own People.

232: 3474: 274: 4492: 4440: 3573:. Because you're a new member, it won't show any user groups. However, after you've made ten edits and your account is four days old, you become an 2744:

I used to go through this kinda thing every 2, 4 or 6 years. This year, was the first time, I just gave up & updated or allowed other to update

2504: 1790: 186: 2609:" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of 583: 3300:

I have never heard of that argument being advanced on Knowledge (XXG) and that argument flies in the face of the core guidelines that dictate how

3225:

There is no government link. one is broken and the other doesn't mention Jaffna as a twin city. I suggest you to look carefully at the citations.

304: 5090:). On a more cynical level, a bureaucrat once told me that !voters look for candidates that aren't too deletionist or too inclusionist, aren't 3826: 3256: 871: 5088:

asking questions that would seem nosy if simply posted on a user talk but because other people are asking questions they feel more comfortable

1963: 1226: 821:

This is a very late response, but thank you for telling me so gently. Your kindness is greatly appreciated and advice gladly taken to heart.

536: 4727: 4590: 4527: 3430: 3111: 2991:

The article on 116th Congress does not include the former President and President Pro Tempore. That is why Pence's information is removed.

292: 4998:

unfamiliar with many of our recent RfA candidates, I'm a little more sympathetic to those strange methods. You probably disagree with me:

2357:

I updated the Eyak language page to have the proper endonym for the language: dAxhunhyuuga’. Iyaq is an exonym, not the native name. See

1480:

I've considered it, but the opening complain of the discussion, seems to have made it clear. Feel free to come up with a statement, etc.

1241:

We both know that your edit summary was inaccurate. Anyone can access the history of a page and check the diffs, you know. And your diff

133: 4758:. I consulted with a couple of administrators that were far more familiar with copyright law than I and they advised me to list them at 3888: 3192: 2441: 1727:

I will be restoring the edits and if you have any further comments you are welcome to discuss on my talk page or the article talk page.

1655: 1012: 4143: 4136: 639:

The postnominal "Bt" is not used when the baronet is also a peer. I notice you've made several edits recently that include this error.

132: 5167: 5163: 5083: 5079: 5075: 5063: 5059: 5024:

She doubled down (a very typical response to me trying to approach on user talk first) indicating that indeed understanding someone's

4999: 4982: 4968: 4951:; sorry for the late reply. You're absolutely right: I don't have the first-hand experience you have, I haven't been through the same 4409: 4241: 4237: 4111: 4085: 4077: 4010:; you caught me just as I had gone on a Wikibreak. I see that the information has now been added and I'm sorry to hear of your block. 3755: 3512:, thank you for the note and sorry for the inconvenience. I'll be sure to keep this in mind when reviewing those pages in the future. 2292: 2106: 2069: 2031: 1877: 1838: 1275: 880:

formatting so thanks for the labelling.Finding out who's responsible for what is a mystery with news and gov.uk not updating properly.

283: 4477:

Thank you again, I will ask and I'm glad of your kindness. I wish you happy editing as well. Yours with Respect. Ed make wiki edits.

2314:. It is inevitable that editors will jump the proverbial gun, but just because it is occurring on other pages doesn't make it right. 1104:, there's not much either of us can do, unfortunately. Obviously it's ideal for someone to reply, but I guess it's their prerogative. 488: 270: 2304: 1574:

That sounds excellent. I look forward to seeing your edits on Knowledge (XXG) and I hope that you stay on to continue contributing.

424: 3412: 575: 347: 287: 5171: 4994: 4187: 3808: 2335: 2210: 899: 867: 784: 916:

I edited accordingly so format as you wish. Also, better if you leave the conversation on your talk page - keep it to one page.

452: 397: 1072:, are you talking about their edits regarding California's 21st? I was under the impression that it was called today by the AP. 4993:

that they're not just trolling for the sake of it. Perhaps I'm naïve: I suspect that most others would have probably reverted

1310:

well at first i did not see the other part but because his attacks on democracy I think the comment was more than appropriate

591: 465: 401: 199: 3202: 3188: 2752:

lieutenant governors, at the stroke of mid-night of the inaugural day. Figured 12 or less hours, wasn't worth the stress :)

2617: 1975: 595: 528: 384: 4103: 3986: 3844: 845: 837: 567: 4425:

Dear Sdrqaz. Thank you for your welcome message. I hope you have a good day to. Yours with Respect. Ed make wiki edits.

3470: 2629: 866:

I placed the ranks to show what level they hold in terms of ministerial seniority. Then there's also the appointments eg

484: 375: 321: 317: 209: 5078:, on the surface I can put it down to just curiosity. People want to know why administrators chose their usernames (see 4634: 4610: 4488: 4436: 4323: 4282: 3884: 3804: 3747: 3014: 2498: 1784: 1558: 1515: 113: 3076: 1969: 981: 603: 343: 1868: 510: 506: 326: 247: 5174:

would probably earn the respect of many editors, but at the risk of losing the support of the questioners.I did see

4762:

instead of mass-nominating them for speedy deletion, wanting to do something other than just deleting them all. The

4755: 5291: 5283: 5278: 5245: 4913: 4888: 4859: 4826: 4543: 2173:"In general, when communicating with others, you should use one of the previous options and not only a timestamp". 1177: 84: 76: 71: 38: 1370:

Howdy. It's too bad, that the infobox at Blinken is being kept different from the other Biden cabinet nominees :(

419: 338: 279: 4183: 3133: 3107: 2839:

you accuse "many editors" of extending criticism to the proposer. Can you name them and/or point to their edits?

2493:

Just visited your page and saw your userbox. As it happens, it's my real-life birthday—an amusing coincidence :)

1759: 1694: 1230: 4750:

is a serious issue. I had stumbled on your userspace pages when patrolling for vandalism and nominated some for

608: 587: 571: 410: 379: 308: 191: 137: 107: 4731: 4531: 4343: 4327: 4053:

Thank you for the apology. It wasn't that annoying, just a minor inconvenience. I hope you enjoy your day too.

3466: 3426: 3115: 3017:, where the President of the Senate changed from Biden to Pence, both are listed. Please revert your own edit. 2921: 2881: 2844: 2555: 1732: 876: 685:

Thanks for adding the styles sections to various nobility articles. I'd just like to point out to you that per

5179: 4594: 3574: 474: 470: 461: 457: 141: 4484: 4452: 4432: 4359:

I hope that's clear, and would be happy to clarify further (though my grasp of the jargon may not be great).

1219:

I added an "s" to his last name, since it was spelled wrong. And you accuse me of vandalism. How dare you?

5215: 4791: 4689: 4685: 4630: 3982: 3931: 3827:

https://andreasplagiarism.wordpress.com/2020/12/02/andreas-theodorou-committed-plagiarism-in-his-phd-thesis/

3320: 3205:, thank you for your message. I will do so, but will take some time to catch up with the situation at hand. 3157: 3034: 2803: 2517: 2494: 2445: 1807: 1780: 1659: 1569: 1554: 1527: 1511: 1008: 746: 728: 699: 4723: 4708:

I wish you had not called out a page I was using to experiment with parsing bibliographic text from books.

4586: 4480: 4428: 4179: 4034: 3832: 3711:

Thank you for your comment, but I would not describe my contribution to that discussion as at all elegant!

3418: 2437: 2102: 2065: 2027: 1873: 1834: 1601: 1316: 1263: 1245:

shows that you clearly did a lot more that just change 'Brook' to 'Brooks'. Kindly refrain from vandalism.

1222: 519: 351: 313: 127: 3773: 2477: 2414: 2345: 2275: 2233: 2177: 2110: 2073: 2035: 1944: 1912: 1881: 1842: 1803: 1776: 1755: 1747: 1743: 1690: 1637: 1354: 1271: 947: 943: 586:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

4854:

as well? You'll see another editor has already agreed with removing the horse racing section. Thank you!

4836:

Sorry, other bits of work around the encyclopedia caught up with me. I'm reviewing the edit request now.

2612: 2130:

Given that what you're saying is in agreement with that, I am baffled that you would remove the passage.

579: 406: 392: 334: 238: 5026:

philosophy/ideology/views regarding Knowledge (XXG) as a whole and as it specifically regards to editing

4909: 4884: 4855: 4822: 4665: 3180: 3172: 1187: 1173: 523: 123: 4955:

event, and naturally my ability to put myself in the candidate's shoes is limited. I think in light of

4413: 4312: 3316: 3184: 2621: 1670: 1326: 1311: 1286: 1267: 388: 242: 195: 4743: 3304:

is carried out. If that were the case, many many pages would have most of their information removed.

1751: 1396:

at the moment, isn't it? I've kind of given up on the issue, as there doesn't seem to be a consensus

1141: 4771: 4137:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/appointment-of-scott-mann-mp-as-a-government-whip-22-january-2021

3305: 480: 447: 4347: 3716: 3620: 3570: 3422: 2930: 2917: 2890: 2877: 2854: 2840: 2569: 2551: 1948: 1728: 644: 3856: 3836: 3486: 3253:

a signing ceremony to twin Kingston with Jaffna, a district in the northern province of Sri Lanka.

2939: 1867:

yes . here you can have the confirmation where Aksel Rykkvin is working with his current teacher .

1620:

That may be so, but you need to cite a source that it is considered as such by the United States.

1431:, go ahead. But I don't think a different result will be achieved: it'll probably be split again. 1048: 5146: 5038: 4937: 4763: 3996: 3945: 3922: 3343: 3284: 3230: 3008: 2992: 2815: 2799: 1022: 999: 921: 885: 742: 724: 695: 157: 4978: 4883:

Since the other editor said to go ahead, I hope you're able to revisit this request. Thank you!

4606: 3751: 3566: 3551: 3087:

includes both the senator from Maine and the senator from Vermont as being Democratic senators.

3084: 2190: 1978:, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. 1463: 532: 3461:

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from

989:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign endorsements

4379: 4259: 3904: 3840: 3784: 3769: 3532: 3498: 3053: 2820:

No problem. It didn't seem like a particularly pleasant RfC and I was happy to be uninvolved.

2757: 2716: 2633: 2286: 2271: 2245: 2229: 2186: 2174: 1485: 1450: 1419: 1375: 1091: 1058: 149: 4203: 3864: 3586: 3578: 2943: 2312:

All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia

1330: 514: 330: 5259: 5191: 5121: 5007: 4874: 4851: 4841: 4818: 4814: 4779: 4673: 4618: 4556: 4507: 4468: 4393: 4364: 4211: 4157: 4126: 4065: 4015: 3966: 3872: 3792: 3735: 3692: 3652: 3601: 3517: 3364: 3328: 3270: 3210: 3141: 3092: 3022: 2996: 2959: 2902: 2862: 2825: 2778: 2735: 2658: 2577: 2525: 2465: 2386: 2319: 2260: 2198: 2135: 2089: 2052: 2009: 1896: 1858: 1815: 1678: 1625: 1579: 1543: 1471: 1436: 1405: 1338: 1298: 1250: 1195: 1109: 1077: 1030: 907: 856: 826: 804: 760: 714: 667: 148:

for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the

52: 17: 4990: 4751: 4319: 4274: 3860: 3643: 3582: 2873: 1940: 1534: 415: 227: 3555: 3390: 2695: 1947:, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at 1943:

on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at

4759: 4747: 3596:, you should be autoconfirmed.If you have any other questions, don't hesitate to ask me! 3067: 1716:

This topic is not a "controversy" - this is not some celebrity's latest plastic surgery.

4977:) that they were happy to answer the question. If I'm completely frank, that feels like 5182:, I don't think it factors into their decision as much (it's quite hard to tell, given 3727: 3712: 3125: 2912: 1165: 1158: 1137: 656: 640: 625: 612: 3462: 3301: 2897:

and others who called it a waste of time when RfCs are required to deprecate sources.

2632:. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. 2122: 144:

to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click

5157: 5142: 5049: 5034: 4948: 4933: 4693: 4647: 4007: 3992: 3674: 3628: 3354: 3339: 3295: 3280: 3242: 3226: 2456:

Thanks for letting me know. I have copied the source citation from that page over to

2418: 1987: 1916: 1720: 917: 895: 881: 686: 153: 4701:

Wish you did not call out "copyright" issues with an experimental page I had created

4354:, or at least one of the modules) wrapping every episode title with inverted commas. 4232: 2592: 5103: 5099: 4652: 4375: 4286: 4270: 4255: 3527: 3509: 3493: 3063: 3049: 2768: 2753: 2727: 2712: 2650: 2544: 2161: 1869:

https://www.musikkeriet.no/matthew-marriott-musikkeriets-sangmester-for-unge-voksne

1481: 1459: 1446: 1428: 1415: 1387: 1371: 1101: 1087: 1086:

More concerned, that he won't answer to anybody, period. No matter what the topic.

1069: 1054: 205: 1928: 5074:. I asked, well, because I was curious what the candidate thought and why.As for 5025: 2295: 1170:

Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Antony Blinken & co

620:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 5258:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5195: 5187: 5150: 5125: 5117: 5042: 5017: 5011: 5003: 4941: 4917: 4905: 4892: 4878: 4870: 4863: 4845: 4837: 4830: 4783: 4775: 4735: 4677: 4669: 4658: 4622: 4614: 4598: 4560: 4552: 4535: 4511: 4503: 4496: 4472: 4464: 4444: 4397: 4389: 4383: 4368: 4360: 4263: 4215: 4207: 4195: 4161: 4153: 4147: 4130: 4122: 4115: 4081: 4069: 4061: 4046: 4019: 4011: 4000: 3970: 3962: 3936: 3876: 3868: 3848: 3796: 3788: 3777: 3739: 3731: 3720: 3696: 3688: 3678: 3656: 3648: 3632: 3605: 3597: 3559: 3537: 3521: 3513: 3503: 3434: 3368: 3360: 3347: 3332: 3324: 3288: 3274: 3266: 3234: 3214: 3206: 3196: 3145: 3137: 3119: 3096: 3088: 3057: 3026: 3018: 3000: 2963: 2955: 2925: 2906: 2898: 2885: 2866: 2858: 2848: 2829: 2821: 2807: 2782: 2774: 2761: 2739: 2731: 2720: 2684: 2662: 2654: 2643: 2581: 2573: 2559: 2529: 2521: 2510: 2469: 2461: 2449: 2404: 2390: 2382: 2374: 2323: 2315: 2279: 2264: 2256: 2237: 2202: 2194: 2180: 2139: 2131: 2114: 2093: 2085: 2077: 2056: 2048: 2039: 2013: 2005: 1991: 1900: 1892: 1885: 1862: 1854: 1846: 1819: 1811: 1796: 1736: 1682: 1674: 1663: 1641: 1629: 1621: 1613: 1583: 1575: 1562: 1547: 1539: 1519: 1489: 1475: 1467: 1454: 1440: 1432: 1423: 1409: 1401: 1379: 1342: 1334: 1320: 1307: 1302: 1294: 1279: 1254: 1246: 1234: 1199: 1191: 1181: 1113: 1105: 1095: 1081: 1073: 1062: 1034: 1026: 1016: 925: 911: 903: 889: 860: 852: 830: 822: 816: 808: 800: 764: 756: 750: 732: 718: 710: 703: 671: 663: 648: 629: 582:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See

161: 51:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4388:

Sure. I'll do a dry run on AWB to try and root those omissions out. Thank you,

2307: 559: 4973: 4766:

disagreed, obviously. Is there a reason why you were using Knowledge (XXG) to

3455: 1510:

Thank you for the warm welcome! I'm excited to help out with whatever I can.

4609:, adding your own opinions to articles isn't allowed. Is there a reason you 4502:

I hope to see you around and look forward to those questions! All the best,

3103: 2481: 2457: 1400:. It is bugging me slightly, but I don't really want to get into edit wars. 1358: 1168:, and I thought it would be helpful if you would also express your views at 936:

Note: Conversation consolidated from conversations on both my talk page and

777:

Note: Conversation consolidated from conversations on both my talk page and

621: 5002:, we probably have opposing views on adminship and RfAs. But that's fine. 4097: 1053:

is going to ignore everybody & not respond to anyone at his talkpage.

3918: 3684: 3670: 3639: 3624: 3485:

where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The

3359:

Could you provide me with a link to this international relation website?

1999: 1983: 709:

Thank you very much for your comments and advice. I'll do so accordingly.

5237: 4796: 2004:

Thank you very much! I'll carry out my duties to the best of my ability.

4278: 4121:

Thanks for letting me know. I'll update it when I get the opportunity.

1329:, that may be your opinion, but Knowledge (XXG) must be written from a 1190:, thank you for the notification. I'll contribute my views accordingly. 1145: 30: 5054:

I'll speak from personal experience. My first foray into RfA was just

3247:

There is a government link. While the URL was broken, it was archived

2047:

just saying it's propaganda is not an adequate reason to remove them.

1762:

per editor's stated preference. Pertinent information can be found at

779: 3465:

and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the

2674:

Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Lara Trump

2340: 2215: 4850:

Sdrqaz, thanks again for your help. Do you have a moment to review

3489:

is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

5058:, over five years after my account was created. And it showed: I 3829:) has attempted to unnecessarily insert his name on AI articles. 4576:

My Apology about my commentary on "True and the Rainbow Kingdom"

1260:

Yeah I checked the edit history He did not vandalize you karen

844:

Hey, I was slightly perplexed by your 12:47 15 February edit on

689:, year ranges are separated by an endash (–), not a hyphen (-). 3820:

On the removal of a reference from the "explainable AI" article

2255:. I think a constitutional amendment is more than settled law. 1414:

The WP:BIO/Noticeboard discussion, should be made into an RFC.

938: 611:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 5232: 4746:, I'm Sdrqaz. This will probably sound hollow, but I'm sorry; 4455:! If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me. 4346:

despite that creating the same rendered text. That's due to {{

3311:

Do not delete a citation merely because the URL is not working

3162: 25: 4989:, but people make decisions in strange ways and I'm ready to 3807:

at Killuminator's talk page, which was itself a follow-up to

5060:

asked a question that you would probably consider irrelevant

4817:

to update the article to be more like the draft I've shared

3585:, which means that they can only be edited by users who are 3039: 2634: 2591: 1976:

Knowledge (XXG):Protection policy#Pending changes protection

1927: 558: 5184:

the last candidate to eschew recall was a bit of an outlier

1702:

Amazon deforestation coverup + Blackstone Paid Wiki editors

4821:. Happy to address any concerns with the proposed update, 3183:

regarding whether the Controversies section consists of a

2916:

if I notice repetitions of such support in future closes.

1333:. Editors cannot pass judgement on the subjects of pages. 976:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

755:

Hey. Sorry, I did – instead of – I'll do – in the future.

3415:

incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.

2362: 1466:, with a "brief, neutral statement ... or question" etc. 1164:

Hi, I noticed your recent edit to restore the infobox on

973:

List of Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign endorsements

957:

List of Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign endorsements

3313:. Dead links should be repaired or replaced if possible. 4228:

Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071

3385: 2950:

That means that where editors believe the source to be

2836: 2601: 2156: 1290: 1242: 970:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

602:

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being

4650:. If it keeps up, I'll log a page protection request. 3919:

top 5 most active pending changes reviewers this month

3487:

burden to provide sources for additions to these pages

4768:

experiment with parsing bibliographic text from books

4202:

Good to know. In the future, kindly do not engage in

3398:

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

2253:

Twentieth Amendment to the United States Constitution

1445:

I've just branded the discussion-in-question, a Rfc.

425:

Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (

4230:. An associated edit from a similarly-named editor ( 4224:

Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Stepgilara

3619:

Hi Sdrqaz. I noticed that you've started a draft at

3581:

and create pages. Some pages on Knowledge (XXG) are

594:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 3066:, I suggest removing them from both. Do you have a 723:Endashes, not emdashes, in the case I referred to. 3130:specifically for the purpose of forming a majority 1462:, you'll probably have to follow the procedure at 5168:a new editor like the one who asked that question 5022:Knowledge (XXG):Should you ask a question at RfA? 4904:Hello again! I've posted a final request for the 4244:was untitled, with heading retrospectively added. 4088:was untitled, with heading retrospectively added. 3526:No need to be sorry. We appreciate your help! 152:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! 5212:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/BusterD 2 4102:I think this is the best source for the article 3454:I see you recently accepted a pending change to 3409:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 1891:Much appreciated. I've added it to the article. 578:to work toward making a version that represents 126:and ask your question there. Please remember to 5106:or what their general philosophical views are ( 4802:Knowledge (XXG):Copyright problems/2021 June 22 3492:Thank you and please keep up your good work! 2434:already: check Cell nucleus, under Evolution. 618:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 2626:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' guide/Rollback 2616:, and that you will not abuse it by reverting 2344:'s talk page, which was itself in response to 4318:As AWB searches "in-source", it ignores what 4106:. Do update if you like cause it is outdated. 2084:family. Please provide a quote stating that. 8: 4813:Sdrqaz, thanks again for offering to review 4222:Note: Pertinent information can be found at 3569:! I assume you're referring to your page at 3475:the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide 140:" by a more experienced editor or joining a 4289:, which involves searching for things like 3949: 3863:, you can report it (with evidence) to the 1972:, the summary of the use of pending changes 570:shows that you are currently engaged in an 5172:questions that are blatantly inappropriate 5072:just feeding own egos/want to hear voice 4721: 4584: 4374:help. Will have a look, catch you soon. 4295:'The Curse of the Flying Hellfish']]{{-"}} 4032: 2435: 2100: 2063: 2025: 1935:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 1871: 1832: 1719:Further I will quote Knowledge (XXG) user 1599: 1314: 1220: 4408:Note: Conversation was in response to my 3803:Note: Conversation was in response to my 3746:Note: Conversation was in response to my 3450:Sources needed for Days of the Year pages 2653:! I'll use it to the best of my ability. 2334:Note: Conversation was in response to my 2209:Note: Conversation was in response to my 1964:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing pending changes 978:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 5251:for the period January 2016 to July 2021 4959:, the community is well aware that RfAs 4664:No problem! I had stumbled across it in 4206:to publicise such valuable information. 4093:Source for British Government Frontbench 3181:Talk:Jonathan D. Gray#Some edit requests 2365:. Please undo your removal of the edit. 44:for the period January 2016 to July 2021 4754:before discovering the list of them at 4140:2401:7400:4009:6801:799B:33A0:56B4:51AD 4098:https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers 2125:). One of the passages you removed was 1128: 900:Ministerial appointments: February 2020 5256:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5180:the community generally favours recall 5087: 5071: 5067: 4986: 4960: 4952: 4790:Note: Conversation was in response to 4767: 4684:Note: Conversation was in response to 4629:Note: Conversation was in response to 4108:2401:7400:4009:6801:5CDD:2E5:A65D:6271 4076:Note: Conversation was in response to 4039:2600:1000:B143:D99C:201F:102B:8CDF:E8D 3883:Note: Conversation was in response to 3811:. A related conversation can be found 3787:, thank you very much. Happy editing! 3458:that did not include a direct source. 3309: 3260: 3252: 2947: 2894: 2677:2601:601:CE80:8640:5DE0:FEFE:7BF7:4B8A 2397:2601:240:CB80:8770:C1C7:ADD6:9711:FC46 2367:2601:240:CB80:8770:C1C7:ADD6:9711:FC46 2311: 2299: 2126: 1606:2001:4454:247:F900:7C6E:E62D:92BC:CFC0 1289:, please read the edit that they made 872:Minister of State for the Armed Forces 49:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4291:"The Curse of the Flying Hellfish"]]" 3726:You're selling yourself short there, 2895:jerk selves off to the accomplishment 2694:; parallel discussions took place at 7: 4987:necessary for you to make a decision 4456: 4054: 3955: 3662: 1802:HAHAHA! I've just began compiling a 1764:the conflict of interest noticeboard 4605:Thank you for the apology. Because 3889:Explainable artificial intelligence 3609:corrected 17:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC) 3407:There is currently a discussion at 2624:. For information on rollback, see 192:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 4985:.I agree that questions should be 1136:@AP_Politics (November 27, 2020). 24: 5210:Note: Conversation was regarding 4567:Note: Conversation was regarding 3911:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 3383:Note: Conversation was regarding 3156:Note: Conversation was following 3033:Note: Conversation was following 2476:Note: Conversation was regarding 2413:Note: Conversation was regarding 2154:Note: Conversation was regarding 1911:Note: Conversation was regarding 1742:Note: Conversation was regarding 1689:Note: Conversation was regarding 1636:Note: Conversation was regarding 1353:Note: Conversation was regarding 987:The article will be discussed at 5236: 4457: 4055: 3956: 3903: 3865:conflict of interest noticeboard 3663: 3402: 2630:Knowledge (XXG):Rollback feature 2543: 1924:Pending changes reviewer granted 963: 868:Minister for Defence Procurement 131: 29: 5076:the question in the current RfA 4772:Knowledge (XXG) isn't a webhost 4668:; that plan sounds good to me. 4421:RE: Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). 4176:Zeki Alasya best turkish actor 3783:That's very kind and gracious, 1970:Knowledge (XXG):Pending changes 607:—especially if you violate the 566:Your recent editing history at 253:Request administrator attention 187:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG) 5068:good way to raise own profile 4756:User:Markjgraham hmb/testcases 3683:Thanks for the encouragement, 2942:is quite clear on the matter. 1017:12:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 4705:Hi (I don't know your name), 4607:Knowledge (XXG) isn't a forum 4104:British government frontbench 3987:British Government frontbench 3812: 3768:unintended tone behind it. -- 3441:Note: Discussion is archived 2978:Note: Discussion is archived 2690:Note: Discussion is archived 2014:23:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC) 1992:23:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC) 1939:" userright, allowing you to 1901:18:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC) 1886:16:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC) 1863:10:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC) 1847:09:46, 27 December 2020 (UTC) 1820:20:50, 25 December 2020 (UTC) 1797:19:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC) 1737:15:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 1683:01:39, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 1664:00:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 1630:16:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 1614:16:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 1584:02:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1563:23:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC) 1548:22:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC) 1520:22:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC) 1490:19:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 1476:19:13, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 1455:19:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 1441:18:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 1424:18:04, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 1410:18:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 1380:17:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 1343:00:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC) 1321:22:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1303:21:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1293:before calling people names. 1280:20:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1206:Note: Discussion is archived 1114:22:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC) 1096:22:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC) 1082:22:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC) 1063:20:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC) 926:05:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC) 912:22:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC) 890:06:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 861:01:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 846:British Government frontbench 838:British Government frontbench 568:Sir George Young, 6th Baronet 297:Biographies of living persons 169: 4748:copyright on Knowledge (XXG) 4635:True and the Rainbow Kingdom 4569:this Did You Know nomination 3583:extended-confirmed protected 3435:12:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC) 3369:16:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 3348:16:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 3333:16:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 3289:15:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 3275:15:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 3235:15:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 3215:22:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC) 3197:19:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) 3146:04:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC) 3120:13:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 3097:17:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC) 3058:16:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC) 3027:13:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 3015:115th United States Congress 3001:13:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 2964:20:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC) 2926:17:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC) 2911:Since those were remarks by 2907:17:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 2886:15:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 2867:02:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 2849:02:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 2830:02:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 2808:21:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 2783:17:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 2762:16:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 2740:16:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 2730:! Sometimes feels futile... 2721:16:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 2685:08:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 2663:13:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 2644:02:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 1966:, the guideline on reviewing 1710:May I ask you to check this 1255:14:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC) 1235:02:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC) 1200:20:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC) 1182:20:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC) 831:18:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 765:16:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC) 751:08:33, 16 October 2016 (UTC) 733:20:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC) 719:19:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC) 704:18:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC) 672:18:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 630:01:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC) 4981:behaviour, given that it's 4611:mentioned those two editors 3981:I'm not sure how to insert 3577:, which allows you to edit 2582:19:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC) 2560:18:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC) 2530:23:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC) 2511:22:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC) 2470:14:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC) 2450:21:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 2405:05:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 2391:02:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 2375:01:56, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 2324:17:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 2280:17:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 2265:16:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 2238:16:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 2203:16:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 2181:13:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 2140:23:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 2115:22:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 2094:22:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 2078:21:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 2057:20:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 2040:18:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 1035:13:37, 4 October 2020 (UTC) 902:for most of my information. 293:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 233:New contributors' help page 162:22:31, 6 January 2016 (UTC) 5310: 4983:easy to dismiss it as moot 4544:Template talk:Did you know 4006:Sorry for the late reply, 4001:07:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 3937:14:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC) 3849:20:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC) 3797:17:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC) 3778:23:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC) 3740:17:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 3721:01:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 3522:18:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC) 3504:16:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC) 3081:formal coalition agreement 809:21:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC) 305:Simplified Manual of Style 228:Frequently Asked Questions 130:on talk pages by clicking 4918:20:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC) 4893:18:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC) 4846:19:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 4831:12:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 4784:14:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC) 4736:02:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC) 4678:13:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 4659:06:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 4623:00:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 4613:in your post-postscript? 4599:22:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 4561:02:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 4536:17:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 4512:01:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 4497:00:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 4473:00:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 4445:23:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4398:14:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 4384:00:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 4369:22:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC) 4297:.My two issues are this: 4264:21:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 3917:Congrats on being in the 3902: 3697:15:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC) 3679:02:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC) 3657:01:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC) 3633:22:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC) 3606:22:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC) 3560:22:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC) 3538:22:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC) 3262:healthcare and education. 3189:ThomasClements Blackstone 3134:Majority Coalition Caucus 3108:Majority Coalition Caucus 1941:review other users' edits 1831:update to be included . 1760:Talk:The Blackstone Group 1695:River valley civilization 649:23:45, 6 April 2016 (UTC) 5196:17:10, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 5151:11:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 5126:00:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 5043:20:29, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 5012:20:11, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 4942:23:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC) 4879:18:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 4864:15:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 4328:The Simpsons (season 14) 4233:Zekialasyametinakpinarrr 4216:01:06, 8 June 2021 (UTC) 4196:15:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 4162:01:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC) 4148:08:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 4131:21:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 4116:04:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 4070:21:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC) 4047:21:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC) 4020:18:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC) 3971:18:03, 11 May 2021 (UTC) 3877:17:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC) 3754:, which was building on 3467:edit notice on that page 3317:Knowledge (XXG):Link rot 1937:pending changes reviewer 1366:Blinken & the others 980:or whether it should be 877:Philip Dunne (Ludlow MP) 4714:But I am disappointed. 4646:For reverting edits at 4249:Searching rendered text 3756:this !vote by Thryduulf 3321:Help:Archiving a source 3102:refers to himself as a 3077:Cameron–Clegg coalition 2793:Jihad Watch RFC closure 2193:is clear on the issue. 453:Help develop an article 262:Policies and Guidelines 5220:the ensuing discussion 5162:I'll confess to being 4764:deleting administrator 4184:ZekiAlasyaMetinAkpinar 4135:Scott Mann is unpaid. 3950: 3338:page was not working. 2876:), I won't challenge. 2596: 1945:Special:PendingChanges 1932: 1649:Reply to December 2020 563: 4961:can go horribly wrong 4330:successfully changed 3471:the content guideline 3411:regarding a possible 3173:Talk:Jonathan D. Gray 2595: 2550:Great job your doing 1931: 1331:neutral point of view 562: 271:Neutral point of view 5249:of past discussions 5133:about that candidate 4953:incredibly stressful 4930:every extra question 4809:Nate Morris reminder 4800:'s talk page and to 4348:#invoke:Episode list 3861:conflict of interest 3579:semi-protected pages 3413:conflict of interest 1771:Best wishes for 2021 1752:The Blackstone Group 604:blocked from editing 475:Translating articles 380:Adopt-a-user program 348:Conflict of interest 288:No original research 42:of past discussions 5164:part of the problem 4711:I am not angry :-) 4293:and changing it to 3896:A barnstar for you! 3707:Projsock discussion 3621:Draft:Shadow docket 3615:Draft:Shadow docket 3571:Special:Preferences 3187:or not? Thank you, 2872:violates an essay ( 2489:Happy wikibirthday! 2310:make it clear that 1949:Special:StablePages 398:No personal attacks 110:to Knowledge (XXG)! 5031:rolling their eyes 4760:copyright problems 4485:Ed make wiki edits 4433:Ed make wiki edits 3587:extended confirmed 3575:autoconfirmed user 3171:Can you assist at 2649:Much appreciated, 2597: 2536:A brownie for you! 2495:AleatoryPonderings 1933: 1808:AleatoryPonderings 1781:AleatoryPonderings 1570:Masterofpresidents 1555:Masterofpresidents 1528:Masterofpresidents 1512:Masterofpresidents 592:dispute resolution 564: 471:Join a WikiProject 466:Requested articles 448:Be bold in editing 402:Resolving disputes 200:Your first article 114:your contributions 5297: 5296: 5266: 5265: 5260:current talk page 5096:too metapedianist 4995:the above message 4738: 4726:comment added by 4601: 4589:comment added by 4546:is pretty long – 4483:comment added by 4431:comment added by 4182:comment added by 4152:Noted, thanks. – 4049: 4037:comment added by 3942: 3941: 3935: 3835:comment added by 3536: 3502: 3421:comment added by 2946:also states that 2565: 2564: 2452: 2440:comment added by 2117: 2105:comment added by 2080: 2068:comment added by 2042: 2030:comment added by 1888: 1876:comment added by 1849: 1837:comment added by 1671:create an account 1616: 1604:comment added by 1323: 1266:comment added by 1237: 1225:comment added by 609:three-revert rule 552: 551: 548: 547: 544: 543: 385:Assume good faith 359: 358: 309:Three-revert rule 168: 167: 90: 89: 59: 58: 53:current talk page 5301: 5275: 5268: 5267: 5240: 5233: 5161: 5092:too exopedianist 5053: 5027: 4910:MS rep 4 NMorris 4885:MS rep 4 NMorris 4856:MS rep 4 NMorris 4823:MS rep 4 NMorris 4799: 4690:this restoration 4655: 4499: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4447: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4310: 4308: 4303: 4296: 4292: 4235: 4198: 4060: 4059: 4058: 3989:, can you help? 3961: 3960: 3959: 3953: 3929: 3927: 3907: 3900: 3899: 3851: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3610: 3594:a couple of days 3530: 3496: 3437: 3406: 3405: 3388: 3358: 3308:clearly states: 3299: 3246: 3165: 3075:affair like the 3042: 3012: 2935:archived version 2819: 2772: 2748:governors & 2641: 2640: 2637: 2608: 2604: 2588:Rollback granted 2547: 2540: 2539: 2343: 2290: 2249: 2218: 2159: 2003: 1938: 1573: 1531: 1391: 1282: 1188:Wallyfromdilbert 1174:wallyfromdilbert 1150: 1149: 1133: 1052: 1015: 1006: 1002: 967: 966: 941: 820: 782: 660: 529:Useful templates 376:Community Portal 363: 362: 322:Image use policy 318:Non-free content 275:Reliable sources 174: 173: 170: 135: 120: 101: 100: 97: 96: 68: 61: 60: 33: 26: 18:User talk:Sdrqaz 5309: 5308: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5271: 5214:, specifically 5176:that discussion 5155: 5056:half a year ago 5047: 4925: 4811: 4797:Markjgraham hmb 4795: 4752:speedy deletion 4703: 4653: 4644: 4578: 4548:your nomination 4524: 4478: 4463:Happy editing, 4458: 4426: 4423: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4306: 4305: 4301: 4294: 4290: 4275:AutoWikiBrowser 4251: 4242:initial message 4236:) can be found 4231: 4177: 4174: 4095: 4086:initial message 4056: 4028: 3979: 3957: 3923: 3898: 3830: 3822: 3765: 3709: 3664: 3617: 3608: 3595: 3548: 3452: 3416: 3403: 3400: 3391:Jaffna District 3384: 3352: 3293: 3240: 3223: 3221:Jaffna District 3177: 3161: 3068:reliable source 3038: 3006: 2989: 2813: 2795: 2766: 2709: 2696:Talk:Lara Trump 2671: 2638: 2635: 2606: 2600: 2590: 2538: 2516:Aww, thank you 2491: 2428: 2355: 2339: 2284: 2243: 2226: 2214: 2171: 2155: 2022: 1997: 1936: 1926: 1828: 1804:list of insults 1773: 1704: 1651: 1596: 1567: 1525: 1508: 1385: 1368: 1261: 1227:141.126.255.119 1217: 1162: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1046: 1045:Howdy. I guess 1043: 1004: 998: 997: 968: 964: 961: 937: 842: 814: 794: 778: 680: 654: 637: 596:page protection 557: 499: 439: 407:Build consensus 368: 344:Deletion policy 263: 220: 210:upload an image 179: 178:Getting Started 164: 118: 105:Hello, Sdrqaz! 95: 64: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5307: 5305: 5295: 5294: 5289: 5286: 5281: 5276: 5264: 5263: 5254: 5241: 5230: 5228: 5226: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5198: 4924: 4921: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4810: 4807: 4787: 4786: 4728:67.188.101.165 4720:- Mark Graham 4702: 4699: 4686:this reversion 4681: 4680: 4666:recent changes 4643: 4640: 4626: 4625: 4591:63.143.116.200 4577: 4574: 4564: 4563: 4528:173.162.220.17 4523: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4422: 4419: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4353: 4338:, but ignored 4336:{{"-}}[['Scuse 4316: 4281:changes, like 4250: 4247: 4219: 4218: 4173: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4094: 4091: 4073: 4072: 4027: 4024: 4023: 4022: 3978: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3940: 3939: 3921:. Great job. – 3914: 3913: 3908: 3897: 3894: 3880: 3879: 3821: 3818: 3800: 3799: 3764: 3761: 3743: 3742: 3708: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3669:Best of luck, 3616: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3593: 3547: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3451: 3448: 3423:Colinmcdermott 3399: 3396: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3222: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3176: 3169: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3131: 3126:Mama Lucy Gang 3112:63.227.108.101 3030: 3029: 2988: 2987:117th Congress 2985: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2918:Peter Gulutzan 2878:Peter Gulutzan 2841:Peter Gulutzan 2833: 2832: 2794: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2708: 2705: 2670: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2570:Phillypaboy123 2568:Aww thank you 2563: 2562: 2552:Phillypaboy123 2548: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2490: 2487: 2473: 2472: 2427: 2424: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2361:(page 11) and 2354: 2351: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2225: 2222: 2206: 2205: 2170: 2167: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2016: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1973: 1967: 1925: 1922: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1827: 1826:Aksel. Rykkvin 1824: 1823: 1822: 1772: 1769: 1729:Colinmcdermott 1703: 1700: 1686: 1685: 1650: 1647: 1633: 1632: 1595: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1367: 1364: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1319:comment added 1258: 1257: 1216: 1213: 1203: 1202: 1166:Antony Blinken 1161: 1159:Antony Blinken 1156: 1152: 1151: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1037: 962: 960: 955:Nomination of 953: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 841: 835: 834: 833: 793: 792:QC Postnominal 790: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 679: 676: 675: 674: 636: 635:Bt postnominal 633: 556: 553: 550: 549: 546: 545: 542: 541: 540: 539: 526: 517: 501: 500: 497: 494: 493: 492: 491: 477: 468: 455: 441: 440: 437: 434: 433: 432: 431: 422: 413: 404: 395: 382: 370: 369: 366: 360: 357: 356: 355: 354: 341: 327:External links 324: 311: 301: 300: 299: 290: 284:Citing sources 277: 265: 264: 261: 258: 257: 256: 255: 250: 248:Tip of the day 245: 235: 230: 222: 221: 218: 215: 214: 213: 212: 202: 189: 181: 180: 177: 166: 165: 128:sign your name 112:Thank you for 104: 94: 91: 88: 87: 82: 79: 74: 69: 57: 56: 47: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5306: 5293: 5290: 5287: 5285: 5282: 5280: 5277: 5274: 5270: 5269: 5261: 5257: 5252: 5248: 5247: 5242: 5239: 5235: 5234: 5231: 5227: 5224: 5223: 5221: 5217: 5213: 5197: 5193: 5189: 5185: 5181: 5177: 5173: 5169: 5165: 5159: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5148: 5144: 5139: 5134: 5129: 5128: 5127: 5123: 5119: 5114: 5113:laissez-faire 5109: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5093: 5089: 5085: 5081: 5077: 5073: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5051: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5040: 5036: 5032: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4996: 4992: 4988: 4984: 4980: 4976: 4975: 4970: 4966: 4965:the candidate 4962: 4958: 4957:recent events 4954: 4950: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4939: 4935: 4931: 4922: 4920: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4894: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4876: 4872: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4843: 4839: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4808: 4806: 4805: 4803: 4798: 4793: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4725: 4718: 4715: 4712: 4709: 4706: 4700: 4698: 4697: 4695: 4694:Manoj Chauhan 4691: 4687: 4679: 4675: 4671: 4667: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4657: 4656: 4649: 4648:Manoj Chauhan 4641: 4639: 4638: 4636: 4632: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4581: 4575: 4573: 4572: 4570: 4562: 4558: 4554: 4549: 4545: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4533: 4529: 4521: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4500: 4498: 4494: 4490: 4486: 4482: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4470: 4466: 4454: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4420: 4418: 4417: 4415: 4411: 4399: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4351: 4349: 4345: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4314: 4299: 4298: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4261: 4257: 4248: 4246: 4245: 4243: 4239: 4234: 4229: 4225: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4200: 4199: 4197: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4171: 4163: 4159: 4155: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4138: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4100: 4099: 4092: 4090: 4089: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4071: 4067: 4063: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4036: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3988: 3984: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3952: 3947: 3946:Novem Linguae 3944: 3943: 3938: 3933: 3928: 3926: 3925:Novem Linguae 3920: 3916: 3915: 3912: 3909: 3906: 3901: 3895: 3893: 3892: 3890: 3886: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3828: 3819: 3817: 3816: 3814: 3810: 3806: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3762: 3760: 3759: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3706: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3614: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3545: 3539: 3534: 3529: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3500: 3495: 3490: 3488: 3482: 3478: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3459: 3457: 3449: 3447: 3446: 3444: 3438: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3414: 3410: 3397: 3395: 3394: 3392: 3387: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3356: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3312: 3307: 3303: 3302:verifiability 3297: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3263: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3244: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3174: 3170: 3168: 3167: 3166:'s talk page. 3164: 3159: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3129: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3069: 3065: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3045: 3044: 3043:'s talk page. 3041: 3036: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3010: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2986: 2984: 2983: 2981: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2936: 2932: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2914: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2817: 2816:IHateAccounts 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2800:IHateAccounts 2792: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2770: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2707:Kamala Harris 2706: 2704: 2703: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2687: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2675: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2642: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2603: 2594: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2566: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2546: 2542: 2541: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2508: 2507: 2502: 2501: 2496: 2488: 2486: 2485: 2483: 2479: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2442:184.162.83.72 2439: 2431: 2425: 2423: 2422: 2420: 2419:Eyak language 2416: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2353:Eyak language 2352: 2350: 2349: 2347: 2342: 2337: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2306: 2302: 2297: 2294: 2288: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2247: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2223: 2221: 2220: 2219:'s talk page. 2217: 2212: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2179: 2176: 2168: 2166: 2165: 2163: 2158: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2119: 2118: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2082: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2001: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1968: 1965: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1930: 1923: 1921: 1920: 1918: 1917:Aksel Rykkvin 1914: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1788: 1787: 1782: 1778: 1770: 1768: 1767: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1748:its reversion 1745: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1725: 1722: 1717: 1714: 1713: 1708: 1701: 1699: 1698: 1696: 1692: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1656:107.181.16.42 1648: 1646: 1645: 1643: 1639: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1593: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1536: 1529: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1505: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1365: 1363: 1362: 1360: 1356: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1322: 1318: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1214: 1212: 1211: 1209: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1160: 1157: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1132: 1129: 1125: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1050: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005:Pigsonthewing 1001: 993: 990: 985: 983: 979: 975: 974: 958: 954: 952: 951: 949: 945: 942:'s talk page 940: 927: 923: 919: 915: 914: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 878: 873: 869: 865: 864: 863: 862: 858: 854: 850: 847: 839: 836: 832: 828: 824: 818: 813: 812: 811: 810: 806: 802: 798: 791: 789: 788: 786: 781: 780:HandsomeFella 766: 762: 758: 754: 753: 752: 748: 744: 743:HandsomeFella 740: 736: 735: 734: 730: 726: 725:HandsomeFella 722: 721: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 696:HandsomeFella 693: 690: 688: 687:MOS:DATERANGE 683: 677: 673: 669: 665: 658: 653: 652: 651: 650: 646: 642: 634: 632: 631: 627: 623: 619: 614: 610: 606: 605: 599: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 561: 554: 538: 534: 530: 527: 525: 521: 518: 516: 512: 508: 505: 504: 503: 502: 498:Miscellaneous 496: 495: 490: 486: 482: 479:Cleaning up: 478: 476: 472: 469: 467: 463: 459: 456: 454: 450: 449: 445: 444: 443: 442: 436: 435: 430: 428: 423: 421: 420:Mailing lists 417: 414: 412: 408: 405: 403: 399: 396: 394: 390: 386: 383: 381: 377: 374: 373: 372: 371: 367:The Community 365: 364: 361: 353: 349: 345: 342: 340: 339:Sock puppetry 336: 332: 328: 325: 323: 319: 315: 312: 310: 306: 303: 302: 298: 294: 291: 289: 285: 281: 280:Verifiability 278: 276: 272: 269: 268: 267: 266: 260: 259: 254: 251: 249: 246: 244: 243:make requests 240: 239:ask questions 236: 234: 231: 229: 226: 225: 224: 223: 217: 216: 211: 207: 203: 201: 197: 193: 190: 188: 185: 184: 183: 182: 176: 175: 172: 171: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 134: 129: 125: 121: 115: 111: 109: 103: 102: 99: 98: 92: 86: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 62: 54: 50: 45: 41: 40: 35: 32: 28: 27: 19: 5272: 5255: 5250: 5244: 5229: 5225: 5209: 5208: 5137: 5132: 5112: 5030: 4972: 4929: 4926: 4903: 4852:this request 4815:this request 4812: 4792:this message 4789: 4788: 4722:— Preceding 4719: 4716: 4713: 4710: 4707: 4704: 4683: 4682: 4651: 4645: 4628: 4627: 4585:— Preceding 4582: 4579: 4566: 4565: 4525: 4479:— Preceding 4427:— Preceding 4424: 4407: 4406: 4350:|sublist}} ( 4287:Chief Wiggum 4277:was to make 4252: 4221: 4220: 4204:sockpuppetry 4178:— Preceding 4175: 4101: 4096: 4075: 4074: 4033:— Preceding 4029: 3991: 3980: 3951:gratias tibi 3924: 3910: 3882: 3881: 3831:— Preceding 3823: 3809:this message 3802: 3801: 3785:Killuminator 3770:Killuminator 3766: 3745: 3744: 3710: 3618: 3591:a week or so 3590: 3549: 3491: 3483: 3479: 3460: 3456:October 12 ‎ 3453: 3440: 3439: 3417:— Preceding 3401: 3382: 3381: 3310: 3257:Surrey Comet 3224: 3178: 3155: 3154: 3072: 3046: 3032: 3031: 2990: 2977: 2976: 2951: 2834: 2796: 2749: 2745: 2710: 2689: 2688: 2672: 2620:edits or to 2610: 2598: 2505: 2499: 2492: 2475: 2474: 2436:— Preceding 2432: 2429: 2412: 2411: 2356: 2341:Killuminator 2333: 2332: 2298:states that 2287:Killuminator 2272:Killuminator 2246:Killuminator 2230:Killuminator 2227: 2216:GiantSnowman 2208: 2207: 2187:GiantSnowman 2172: 2162:Adem Jashari 2153: 2152: 2107:69.125.89.31 2101:— Preceding 2070:69.125.89.31 2064:— Preceding 2032:69.125.89.31 2026:— Preceding 2023: 2020:Adem Jashari 1982: 1957: 1956: 1953: 1934: 1910: 1909: 1878:89.32.147.58 1872:— Preceding 1839:89.32.147.58 1833:— Preceding 1829: 1791: 1785: 1774: 1741: 1740: 1726: 1718: 1715: 1709: 1705: 1688: 1687: 1652: 1635: 1634: 1600:— Preceding 1597: 1535:edit warring 1509: 1393: 1369: 1352: 1351: 1315:— Preceding 1268:SammyWaffle! 1262:— Preceding 1259: 1221:— Preceding 1218: 1205: 1204: 1163: 1131: 1123: 1044: 1023:Andy Mabbett 1013:Andy's edits 1009:Talk to Andy 1000:Andy Mabbett 994: 986: 971: 969: 959:for deletion 935: 934: 851: 843: 799: 795: 776: 775: 738: 694: 691: 684: 681: 638: 617: 601: 600: 565: 555:January 2016 537:User scripts 511:Disambiguity 446: 438:Things to do 427:The Signpost 426: 416:IRC channels 411:Village pump 219:Getting Help 150:edit summary 117: 106: 65: 48: 43: 37: 5243:This is an 5104:immediatist 5100:eventualist 5000:like I said 4906:Nate Morris 4717:Take care, 4320:Lua modules 4172:Zeki Alasya 4082:Joe Manchin 4078:these edits 4026:Joe Manchin 3386:these edits 3185:WP:COATRACK 2169:Five tildes 2157:these edits 2128:surrender." 1642:Rogue state 1392:It is just 1327:SammyWaffle 1312:SammyWaffle 1287:SammyWaffle 1100:Ah, I see. 692:Thank you. 588:noticeboard 462:Peer review 458:Maintenance 206:edit a page 142:WikiProject 36:This is an 4974:vi coactus 4344:§ Episodes 3983:Scott Mann 3977:Scott Mann 3546:User group 3306:WP:DEADREF 3158:my message 3035:my message 2837:this close 2726:Very true 2669:Lara Trump 2622:revert-war 2618:good-faith 2611:reverting 2607:rollbacker 1756:Reply made 1124:References 524:Talk pages 520:User pages 507:Categories 352:Notability 314:Copyrights 237:Where to: 119:{{helpme}} 5292:Archive 5 5284:Archive 3 5279:Archive 2 5273:Archive 1 5143:—valereee 5035:—valereee 4971:(perhaps 4969:professed 4934:—valereee 4631:this edit 4332:"[['Scuse 4324:This edit 4283:this edit 3885:this edit 3728:Thryduulf 3713:Thryduulf 3687:! Yours, 3104:Socialist 3079:, with a 2940:WP:DEPREC 2613:vandalism 2482:Symbiosis 2478:this edit 2458:Symbiosis 2426:Symbiosis 2415:this edit 2346:this edit 2301:performed 2293:15 U.S.C. 1958:See also: 1913:this edit 1744:this edit 1691:this edit 1638:this edit 1506:My Thanks 1359:Mo Brooks 1355:this edit 1215:Mo Brooks 785:talk page 739:1897–1904 657:Opera hat 641:Opera hat 580:consensus 576:talk page 489:Vandalism 393:Etiquette 335:Vandalism 124:talk page 85:Archive 5 77:Archive 3 72:Archive 2 66:Archive 1 5158:Valereee 5108:this RfA 5050:Valereee 4949:Valereee 4724:unsigned 4587:unsigned 4493:contribs 4481:unsigned 4441:contribs 4429:unsigned 4410:question 4340:[['Scuse 4322:render. 4192:contribs 4180:unsigned 4035:unsigned 4008:BlueD954 3993:BlueD954 3845:contribs 3833:unsigned 3825:Andreas( 3763:Response 3752:WP:VPPOL 3473:and/or 3431:contribs 3419:unsigned 3355:YaSiRu11 3340:YaSiRu11 3296:YaSiRu11 3281:YaSiRu11 3259:states: 3243:YaSiRu11 3227:YaSiRu11 2952:de facto 2438:unsigned 2395:Thanks! 2305:4 U.S.C. 2224:Congress 2191:WP:RFCST 2103:unsigned 2066:unsigned 2028:unsigned 1874:unsigned 1835:unsigned 1721:Grayfell 1602:unsigned 1594:Cameroon 1464:WP:RFCST 1276:contribs 1264:unsigned 1223:unsigned 1144:) – via 939:BlueD954 918:BlueD954 896:BlueD954 882:BlueD954 678:Endashes 616:warring— 590:or seek 572:edit war 389:Civility 204:How to: 196:Tutorial 154:Peaceray 122:on your 93:Welcome! 5246:archive 5138:agonize 4654:Lugnuts 4642:Thanks! 4583:~meow~ 4522:Thanks! 4376:Neils51 4352:I think 4279:MOS:QWQ 4256:Neils51 3857:Mindpit 3855:I see, 3837:Mindpit 3805:message 3528:Toddst1 3510:Toddst1 3494:Toddst1 3163:Wxstorm 3064:Wxstorm 3050:Wxstorm 2944:WP:DEPS 2769:GoodDay 2754:GoodDay 2728:GoodDay 2713:GoodDay 2698:and at 2651:Fastily 2602:granted 2599:I have 2336:message 2211:message 2178:Snowman 1482:GoodDay 1460:GoodDay 1447:GoodDay 1429:GoodDay 1416:GoodDay 1394:Nominee 1388:GoodDay 1372:GoodDay 1317:undated 1146:Twitter 1102:GoodDay 1088:GoodDay 1070:GoodDay 1055:GoodDay 1049:Sgarvey 1041:Sgarvey 982:deleted 682:Hello. 613:reverts 481:General 138:adopted 108:Welcome 39:archive 5188:Sdrqaz 5118:Sdrqaz 5018:Sdrqaz 5004:Sdrqaz 4991:assume 4979:sticky 4871:Sdrqaz 4838:Sdrqaz 4776:Sdrqaz 4742:Hello 4670:Sdrqaz 4615:Sdrqaz 4553:Sdrqaz 4504:Sdrqaz 4465:Sdrqaz 4451:Hello 4414:WT:AWB 4390:Sdrqaz 4361:Sdrqaz 4313:WT:AWB 4240:. The 4208:Sdrqaz 4154:Sdrqaz 4123:Sdrqaz 4084:. The 4062:Sdrqaz 4012:Sdrqaz 3963:Sdrqaz 3869:Sdrqaz 3789:Sdrqaz 3732:Sdrqaz 3689:Sdrqaz 3649:Sdrqaz 3644:WP:OWN 3598:Sdrqaz 3514:Sdrqaz 3361:Sdrqaz 3325:Sdrqaz 3267:Sdrqaz 3207:Sdrqaz 3203:Thomas 3138:Sdrqaz 3089:Sdrqaz 3073:ad hoc 3040:Jusfiq 3019:Sdrqaz 3009:Jusfiq 2993:Jusfiq 2956:Sdrqaz 2899:Sdrqaz 2874:WP:ACD 2859:Sdrqaz 2822:Sdrqaz 2775:Sdrqaz 2732:Sdrqaz 2655:Sdrqaz 2639:ASTILY 2574:Sdrqaz 2522:Sdrqaz 2462:Sdrqaz 2383:Sdrqaz 2316:Sdrqaz 2257:Sdrqaz 2195:Sdrqaz 2132:Sdrqaz 2086:Sdrqaz 2049:Sdrqaz 2006:Sdrqaz 1893:Sdrqaz 1855:Sdrqaz 1812:Sdrqaz 1675:Sdrqaz 1622:Sdrqaz 1576:Sdrqaz 1540:Sdrqaz 1468:Sdrqaz 1433:Sdrqaz 1402:Sdrqaz 1335:Sdrqaz 1308:Sdrqaz 1295:Sdrqaz 1247:Sdrqaz 1192:Sdrqaz 1106:Sdrqaz 1074:Sdrqaz 1027:Sdrqaz 904:Sdrqaz 853:Sdrqaz 823:Sdrqaz 817:Atchom 801:Atchom 757:Sdrqaz 711:Sdrqaz 664:Sdrqaz 4304:into 4271:Neils 3985:into 3748:!vote 3567:Lev21 3552:Lev21 3265:edit. 2931:Peter 2891:Peter 2855:Peter 2835:With 2605:the " 2430:Hi, 2296:§ 262 2175:Giant 1777:Karen 1142:Tweet 662:now). 533:Tools 515:Stubs 16:< 5218:and 5192:talk 5147:talk 5122:talk 5084:here 5082:and 5080:here 5064:here 5039:talk 5008:talk 4967:has 4947:Hi, 4938:talk 4914:talk 4889:talk 4875:talk 4860:talk 4842:talk 4827:talk 4819:here 4780:talk 4744:Mark 4732:talk 4688:and 4674:talk 4619:talk 4595:talk 4557:talk 4532:talk 4508:talk 4489:talk 4469:talk 4437:talk 4394:talk 4380:talk 4365:talk 4260:talk 4238:here 4226:and 4212:talk 4188:talk 4158:talk 4144:talk 4127:talk 4112:talk 4066:talk 4043:talk 4016:talk 3997:talk 3967:talk 3932:talk 3873:talk 3841:talk 3813:here 3793:talk 3774:talk 3736:talk 3717:talk 3693:talk 3675:talk 3653:talk 3638:Hi, 3629:talk 3602:talk 3556:talk 3533:talk 3518:talk 3499:talk 3477:. 3463:WP:V 3443:here 3427:talk 3365:talk 3344:talk 3329:talk 3319:and 3315:See 3285:talk 3271:talk 3255:The 3249:here 3231:talk 3211:talk 3193:talk 3142:talk 3116:talk 3093:talk 3085:here 3054:talk 3023:talk 2997:talk 2980:here 2960:talk 2922:talk 2903:talk 2882:talk 2863:talk 2845:talk 2826:talk 2804:talk 2779:talk 2758:talk 2736:talk 2717:talk 2692:here 2681:talk 2659:talk 2628:and 2578:talk 2556:talk 2526:talk 2466:talk 2446:talk 2401:talk 2387:talk 2371:talk 2363:here 2359:here 2320:talk 2308:§ 72 2276:talk 2261:talk 2234:talk 2199:talk 2136:talk 2123:WP:V 2111:talk 2090:talk 2074:talk 2053:talk 2036:talk 2010:talk 1988:talk 1897:talk 1882:talk 1859:talk 1843:talk 1816:talk 1746:and 1733:talk 1679:talk 1660:talk 1626:talk 1610:talk 1580:talk 1559:talk 1544:talk 1516:talk 1486:talk 1472:talk 1451:talk 1437:talk 1420:talk 1406:talk 1398:here 1376:talk 1339:talk 1299:talk 1291:here 1272:talk 1251:talk 1243:here 1231:talk 1208:here 1196:talk 1178:talk 1172:. – 1110:talk 1092:talk 1078:talk 1059:talk 1031:talk 948:here 946:and 944:here 922:talk 908:talk 886:talk 870:and 857:talk 840:rank 827:talk 805:talk 761:talk 747:talk 729:talk 715:talk 700:talk 668:talk 645:talk 626:talk 622:Keri 485:Spam 331:Spam 158:talk 146:here 5186:). 5102:or 5094:or 5070:or 4923:rfa 4794:at 4692:at 4633:at 4412:at 4342:in 4334:to 4326:at 4285:at 4269:Hi 4080:at 3887:at 3750:at 3685:Mz7 3671:Mz7 3640:Mz7 3625:Mz7 3565:Hi 3389:at 3160:at 3037:at 2913:JBL 2750:new 2746:new 2700:ANI 2506:!!! 2503:) ( 2500:??? 2480:at 2417:at 2338:at 2213:at 2160:at 2000:Mz7 1984:Mz7 1915:at 1792:!!! 1789:) ( 1786:??? 1758:at 1750:at 1693:at 1640:at 1357:at 1068:Hi 1007:); 894:Hi 783:'s 598:. 584:BRD 194:• 5288:→ 5216:Q5 5194:) 5149:) 5124:) 5086:– 5041:) 5010:) 4940:) 4916:) 4891:) 4877:) 4862:) 4844:) 4829:) 4782:) 4770:? 4734:) 4676:) 4621:) 4597:) 4559:) 4534:) 4510:) 4495:) 4491:• 4471:) 4453:Ed 4443:) 4439:• 4396:) 4382:) 4367:) 4302:'' 4262:) 4214:) 4194:) 4190:• 4160:) 4146:) 4129:) 4114:) 4068:) 4045:) 4018:) 3999:) 3969:) 3948:, 3875:) 3867:. 3847:) 3843:• 3795:) 3776:) 3738:) 3719:) 3695:) 3677:) 3655:) 3631:) 3604:) 3558:) 3520:) 3469:, 3433:) 3429:• 3367:) 3346:) 3331:) 3287:) 3273:) 3233:) 3213:) 3195:) 3144:) 3118:) 3095:) 3056:) 3025:) 2999:) 2962:) 2924:) 2905:) 2884:) 2865:) 2847:) 2828:) 2806:) 2781:) 2760:) 2738:) 2719:) 2683:) 2661:) 2580:) 2572:! 2558:) 2528:) 2518:AP 2509:) 2468:) 2448:) 2403:) 2389:) 2373:) 2322:) 2303:; 2278:) 2263:) 2236:) 2201:) 2138:) 2113:) 2092:) 2076:) 2055:) 2038:) 2012:) 1990:) 1951:. 1899:) 1884:) 1861:) 1845:) 1818:) 1795:) 1775:… 1754:. 1735:) 1681:) 1662:) 1628:) 1612:) 1582:) 1561:) 1546:) 1518:) 1488:) 1474:) 1453:) 1439:) 1422:) 1408:) 1378:) 1341:) 1301:) 1278:) 1274:• 1253:) 1233:) 1198:) 1180:) 1112:) 1094:) 1080:) 1061:) 1033:) 1011:; 984:. 924:) 910:) 888:) 859:) 829:) 807:) 763:) 749:) 731:) 717:) 702:) 670:) 647:) 628:) 535:• 531:• 522:• 513:• 509:• 487:• 483:• 473:• 464:• 460:• 451:• 418:• 409:• 400:• 391:• 387:• 378:• 350:• 346:• 337:• 333:• 329:• 320:• 316:• 307:• 295:• 286:• 282:• 273:• 241:• 208:• 198:• 160:) 81:→ 5262:. 5253:. 5222:. 5190:( 5160:: 5156:@ 5145:( 5120:( 5052:: 5048:@ 5037:( 5016:@ 5006:( 4936:( 4912:( 4887:( 4873:( 4858:( 4840:( 4825:( 4804:. 4778:( 4730:( 4696:. 4672:( 4637:. 4617:( 4593:( 4571:. 4555:( 4530:( 4506:( 4487:( 4467:( 4435:( 4416:. 4392:( 4378:( 4363:( 4309:" 4307:' 4258:( 4210:( 4186:( 4156:( 4142:( 4125:( 4110:( 4064:( 4041:( 4014:( 3995:( 3965:( 3934:) 3930:( 3891:. 3871:( 3839:( 3815:. 3791:( 3772:( 3758:. 3734:( 3715:( 3691:( 3673:( 3651:( 3627:( 3600:( 3554:( 3535:) 3531:( 3516:( 3501:) 3497:( 3445:. 3425:( 3393:. 3363:( 3357:: 3353:@ 3342:( 3327:( 3298:: 3294:@ 3283:( 3269:( 3245:: 3241:@ 3229:( 3209:( 3191:( 3175:? 3140:( 3114:( 3091:( 3052:( 3021:( 3011:: 3007:@ 2995:( 2982:. 2958:( 2920:( 2901:( 2880:( 2861:( 2843:( 2824:( 2818:: 2814:@ 2802:( 2777:( 2771:: 2767:@ 2756:( 2734:( 2715:( 2702:. 2679:( 2657:( 2636:F 2576:( 2554:( 2524:( 2497:( 2484:. 2464:( 2460:. 2444:( 2421:. 2399:( 2385:( 2369:( 2348:. 2318:( 2289:: 2285:@ 2274:( 2259:( 2248:: 2244:@ 2232:( 2197:( 2164:. 2134:( 2109:( 2088:( 2072:( 2051:( 2034:( 2008:( 2002:: 1998:@ 1986:( 1919:. 1895:( 1880:( 1857:( 1841:( 1814:( 1783:( 1766:. 1731:( 1697:. 1677:( 1658:( 1644:. 1624:( 1608:( 1578:( 1572:: 1568:@ 1557:( 1542:( 1530:: 1526:@ 1514:( 1484:( 1470:( 1449:( 1435:( 1418:( 1404:( 1390:: 1386:@ 1374:( 1361:. 1337:( 1297:( 1270:( 1249:( 1229:( 1210:. 1194:( 1176:( 1148:. 1140:( 1108:( 1090:( 1076:( 1057:( 1051:: 1047:@ 1029:( 1003:( 950:. 920:( 906:( 884:( 855:( 825:( 819:: 815:@ 803:( 787:. 759:( 745:( 727:( 713:( 698:( 666:( 659:: 655:@ 643:( 624:( 429:) 156:( 55:. 46:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index