User talk:Sethie - Knowledge (XXG)

910: 615: 1363: 1275: 1187: 716: 486: 120: 1117: 983: 348: 442:

3)TantraYum, minus ONE accidental comment on a talk page (meaning I posted as Sethie and then accidentally as TantraYum) engaged in NO sockpuppetry. The two accounts were not active on the same page at the same time or even within MONTHS of each other. Verdict of the investigative committee: It was a

1158:

template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons

316:

article a year ago, excluding the awards from the tables, and putting more info in the lead, and some guy repeatedly reverted the edits, causing the page to be blocked. I recently did the changes again, to the same response from the same user. Can you check out the edits and give your honest opinion

132:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

498:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

280:) where I gave some info on why I'm skeptical about that Times of India article (in addition to what I noted, I can't find any information as to what the "IACMM" court *is*). In either case, I agree with you - if it's true, it should absolutely be there. 887:

Wow- appreciate the courtesy of sharing why you reverted. There were a number of sources in there- if you feel they don't meet wp:rs or aren't being accurately cited, I won't argue.... I was just on Vandalism patrol. Thanks again for dropping by.

926:

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

252:

Hey, just wanted to let you know why I reverted your edit. The architecture info appears to be a high-quality bit of vandalism. The "Lorenzo von Matterhorn" individual named as architect is a pop culture reference (see

38:

Sethie: I used half of you suggestion for title-changing, but got the unwanted result of 2 titles for a single text: situational logic (desired) and situational analysis (to be eliminated). Can you sort out this mess?

1408: 1318: 1230: 759: 526: 160: 19:

1/08- 11/08 Thanks for you response to my request for changing-title protocols, but I don't understand your point. I accepted editor Interstellarity's advice to use WP:RM#CM, which put my intent on the

1392:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1302:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1214:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 743:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 510:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 144:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 237:(Regarding the Anna Faris edit; I thought it was fine to just mention the sequel's name and its release, as her character wasn't even mentioned when the first film is talked about in the article. 1077:'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See 1377: 1288: 1200: 947: 940: 932: 928: 729: 987: 435:

1)TantaYum was not a sockpupper. I never made a single edit with it. It was a typo for TantraYum. Verdict of the investigative committee: It was a sockpuppet that I had abused.

630:

and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not edit war on this article. Please do not use a sockpuppet to restore the unsourced material. Thank you.

295:

Not sure if you're watching the page, but I just responded to the Talk discussion. What do you think should be done? It's a little tricky, and I want to be fair to both sides.

841:

Thanks for you response to my question, but I don't understand your response. I accepted editor Interstellarity's suggested to post at WP:RM#CM, which put my intent on the

461:

While I honor that they were trying to protect wikipedia... a beautiful need and wish, their strategy for doing so sucked and was erroneous on multiple levels (see above).

438:

2)Devalover was LEGITIMATE sockpuppet. I used it soley for editing prostitution and sex worker related topics- which according to the sockpuppet guidelines, IS ALLOWED: -->

955: 223:

Of all the years I've been doing this on Knowledge (XXG), this the first time I actually receive such a positive message. Thank you for that, I really appreciate it.

446:

4)I created TantraYum to protect my privacy, Sethie reveals my given name, I told this directly to the person running the investigation, he didn't believe me.

370: 202: 24:

talk page. I don't expect any response, since the article has not been revised or generated any talk since it was first posted. Any reason I should do more?

583: 73: 845:

talk page. I do not expect a response, since that article has not been revised or generated talk since it was first posted. Any reason for me to do more?

1078: 198: 1160: 1129: 1136:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge (XXG), this is supplied at minimum in an

958:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 400: 631: 579: 69: 1431: 1341: 1252: 781: 619: 540: 325: 254: 224: 174: 672: 569: 452:

6) I was accused of being yet another sockpuppet by this committee. To their credit they at laest they admitted they were wrong about.

1062: 951: 1042: 1004: 1427: 1337: 1248: 777: 536: 170: 1401: 1311: 1223: 812: 752: 519: 153: 66:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1009: 396: 1084:

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -

321:

as there is a whole article exclusively for awards and nominations, but the user's attitude is pretty ugly to deal with.

936: 623: 1121: 991: 565: 557: 388: 356: 1413: 1323: 1235: 764: 531: 165: 627: 262: 58:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

464:

The facts speak for themselves.... as do the diminishing number of editors on wikipedia, ala instances like this.

379: 374: 366: 635: 16: 458:

8) If anyone had ASKED, I would have told them all of this, instead, they started an adversarial investigation.

392: 1125: 329: 313: 228: 1389: 1299: 1211: 1002:(COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the 808: 740: 507: 141: 676: 419: 245: 1133: 573: 208: 1029: 967: 258: 1163:. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — 1095: 1074: 999: 842: 800: 556:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

21: 1371: 1282: 1194: 723: 494: 128: 649:

You removed material saying it was trivia. I disagreed, put it back in, and this is your response?

1385: 1295: 1207: 736: 503: 432:

About this..... Keep in mind the sheer number of errors made by the people who "investigated me."

137: 414: 1019:

articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;

990:

your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things

1168: 1148:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 1137: 850: 827: 599: 300: 285: 89: 44: 29: 1397: 1307: 1219: 1052: 748: 515: 149: 1420: 1330: 1242: 963: 916:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

871: 771: 406: 395:. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 1400:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1393: 1310:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1303: 1222:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1215: 751:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 744: 518:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 511: 152:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 145: 1152: 1086: 689:

Imitation is the highest form of flattery... and you are twisting the facts.... goodbye.

576:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 995: 909: 668: 671:, and the above is your response? Good luck with following Knowledge (XXG) policies. 590:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

197:

is my first article in en.WP, therefore any help on the intro, would be appriciated!

80:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1164: 860: 846: 823: 819: 595: 591: 561: 296: 281: 277: 85: 81: 40: 25: 1362: 1274: 1186: 715: 614: 485: 119: 1132:. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge (XXG)'s content, here or elsewhere, 889: 882: 867: 690: 653: 465: 99: 439:

Verdict of the investigative committee: It was a sockpuppet that I had abused.

278:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Daniel_S._Pe%C3%B1a_Sr.#Rewrite_on_April_18,_2018

59: 1141: 193:. I 'd like to let you know that I am not a native speaker of English, that 63: 1140:

at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and

1404:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1314:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1226:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1116: 982: 755:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

522:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

156:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1381:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1292:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1204:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

804: 733:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

347: 1435: 1345: 1256: 1172: 1105: 971: 897: 875: 854: 831: 785: 698: 680: 661: 639: 603: 544: 473: 449:

5) As TantraYum I did 97% RC patrol, aka patrolling for vandalism.

424: 333: 289: 266: 232: 212: 178: 107: 93: 48: 33: 1124:

to Knowledge (XXG). It appears that you copied or moved text from

1041:

your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see

1417:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1327:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1239:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 922:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

799:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

768:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1407:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

1375:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

1317:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

1229:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

758:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

525:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

387:, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans 159:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1286:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

1198:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

1146:

copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution

342: 455:

7) All I was interested in doing was protecting my privacy.

1043:

Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI

276:

Hey there - I just wanted to point you to the talk page (

257:

and the Lorenzo von Matterhorn wiki used as a citation).

1025:

on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the

866:

Sorry, but I see nothing that seems reasonably sourced.

727:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1388: