User talk:Severo/Archive 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

1131:(which you chose to delete). Structured argument goes far with me, cowardly threats do not. Do not alter other people's comments on talk pages: if someone is making a daft assertion, let it be because then others will see they are being daft as well. One I have left here, and elsewhere, is your assertion that I am an administrator. I have no intention to be as I have a lot of project work to do. Your failure to sign posts makes you appear cowardly. Don't try to preach Knowledge (XXG) policy and guideline at me, I know the basics and a bit more which is more than you are willing to exhibit. I am not prepared to discuss this with you further, but would like to take the opportunity to thank you for coming to Knowledge (XXG) and trying to help. I hope you do decide to sign up and work as part of the community to improve a wide array of articles. This is the last word on here - all further comments from you on this matter on this page will be reverted on sight. Thanks and regards, 732:

doped lacks physiological credibility. This statement did not refer to a person, but to the statement it was made in reply to. Notably, you did not delete that one, despite the fact that it DID make statements on a specific person. The article as it is is a fanboy hackjob, from a scientific level about as credible as intelligent design. If that is the standard you thrive for in WikiProject Cycling, the last thing cycling needs is that project. This year's tour and its prelude with countless confessions should have been testimony enough that athletes's statements about not using performance-enhancing drugs are devoid of credibility. But you still let the fanboys run rampant who treat as holy writ everything their great heroes tell them. --

554:

encyclopedia takes the value out of these books perhaps(?), the thing about Kellys early career is all in David Walsh's book Kelly which maybe is very difficult to get new these days but am not sure, what things do you think are relevant and should be added to this biography?; - things such as Kellys Olympic exclusion, stage wins in 78 and 80 or 81 tours, the sean kelly square that was unveiled in his town in 1983 i think, the fact that the year 1984 was a savage one for Kelly, the big parade after his tour of spain win in his town in 1988, riding for PDM 1989 to 1991 ending with the team dropping out of tour and the suspected doping network of this team in this 1991 tour which was investigated in 1997 I think, anyway just some thoughts,

815:"If you don't like something I've written..." If you insist on being 150% on BLP, how about you heed it yourself, instead of enforcing it with others only? Your calling statements of fact libellous while at the same time slandering away ad libidum against sources which happen to have their own Knowledge (XXG) article is POV-pushing in the extreme, and given that we're talking about an activity that is considered criminal in several countries, you should think twice about whether you really want to transform Knowledge (XXG) into a doping whitewash and destroy any credibility regarding 894:) plenty of facts to show him that anything above 200 pounds is a heavyweight. He, however, seems to be unable to grasp that "anything over 200 pounds" and "201 pounds and above" are not the same thing. In boxing, the upper limit for the cruiserweight division (the division immediately below heavyweight) is 200 pounds. Since 200 pounds is the upper limit, that means that for heavyweight you can weigh anything over 200 pounds. What the other user doesn't appreciate is that this includes 200 1/4 pounds and the like, not just 201 pounds. 31: 1473: 600:. This website offers information in several languages, but the most information is available in Dutch. However it isn't that hard to understand if you know where to look. They have plenty of detailed results available, easily accessable per rider, per team, per race, per stage or whatever. If you need any help with the language, just let me know. 246:

all the existing links, but the great majority of new links people make to Jan Janssen will be to the cyclist as well and few will check if it links to the right site. Your a cycling buff it seems, but even for non-cyclist people from the Netherlands, where the name is awfully common, "Jan Janssen" means only one person ;-)

290:), googling estimates 138,000 hits for "Jan Janssen" and only 87,100 hits when excluding "cyclist" and "tour de france" in a few languages, while 48 of the 53 main wikipedia links are to him (the gymnast, finishing 60th in the 1908 olympics (!), is unlikely to get more than the 5 he has now). No biggie of course. 1058:

Look, look, go on boxing wikipedia (and boxrec users) users who edits here on boxing articles, email them in private/directly and you will find out i am correct, i will not give you any sources, because you do not want to read, is this too hard ? I tried to explain the difference on boxing and metric

245:

To create a disambiguation page for Jan Janssen, instead of renaming the original Jan Janssen article to Jan Janssen (cyclist), you probably should have created a "Jan Janssen (disambiguation)" page and added a line "For other people named J.J. see..." on top of the original. You've labored to change

1391:

is a UK wide guideline set up this summer/autumn to standardise the layout for British settlement's entries. It's not set in stone, or a policy as such, but does include handy tips to help users write in a consistent and proffessional way. Just though I should let you know to aid the article along!

731:

Contrary to your suggestions, the source was already in the article. Also, the statement you deleted referred to testing only being available from a specific timepoint onward -which is not a statement on a person- and that a certain gap in performance compared to other athletes who are known to have

659:

Thank you for your welcome, and the tips! I do feel encouraged. It feels very good to have such a concise and accessible list of useful tips at hand, and I hope to be able to use them in due course; but also, as for now, I have to allow myself some tottering and stumbling at my own pace... (allow

1024:

How can I sign, i dont have account, also I am requesting, do not allow those words to be part of the talk, also i asked you to allow my reply to heavyweight, do not put back those names mkil put, he is doing that since forever to make me angry and create problems, do you understand me, he was told

990:

The weight limit for the heavyweight class has varied over the years. In 1984, the super-heavyweight class was introduced as the unlimited category. The current super-heavyweight Olympic class is 91 kg (200.5 lb), which is equivalent to the heavyweight division in professional boxing. So if we take

943:

Always remember to sign my talk page please. I don't understand your edit summary, of what should I be careful? All I have requested is a reliable source to end an edit war? I'm confused! Anyway, I will look at this sometime in the next week (hopefully tomorrow) and we can try to arrive at a nice

351:

Sorry that i missed coming back to the review. Had it in my "to-do" list but somehow forgot. I think that the article is good but lacks one detail that bothers me much. i think the entire article will get simplified when you provide details on how each of the individual forces affect the bicycle.

562:

Severo, thanks for advice, I added more information about Sean Kelly - using references from the web and so on and I also made a page about the famous stage race here in Ireland that he dominated in the 80s (have been interested in this stuff a long time but doing it now to avoid studying!!),

456:"Just a copyedit" - it's a tall order, especially given the advice that we get someone else to do it. I came across an "editors' wikiproject" somewhere - if we could find it again, someone might help. It would be fabulous to get FA before the end of 2007. An tehn of course there is the main 553:

hello Severo, I am also interested in editing cyclist biographies - I tried to change my user name but couldnt so did new account in my bikes name! but anyway the thing is im not sure how far we should go in detailing the biography of Kelly as there are books available, and a more detailed

1146:

Hello Severo! Thanks for the cleanup you did in my cycling articles. After your edits I've seen a lot of mistakes I made and hopefully will improve that. I have also seen you mainly edited: -'infobox'(why do you want infobox clear of links?, I didn't know that was wrong) -A lot of typos

443:

I think we are ok on that count now - the POVs are all gone (and some striking writing with it). The next problem might be to get citations for all the milestone dates, which will be a real pain. I got the census data from Vision of Britain but the rest comes from all over the place.

401:

Confused me too - is the figure "200,000" he considers uncited? (which is a fair cop - so obvious that I didn't see it). Or every other sentence in that section? No matter. It won't take long to rectify after a trip to the library. Also, is there any relevant infobox we could use?

162:

think that it is there but the question of "good writing" is always subjective and it depends on what the reviewer likes. They generally give feedback so if it doesn't make GA we know what we have to do to fix it. After GA, we might even hope to get FA for 40th birthday!

1449:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 411:

None of the other "History of" cities have an infobox, but then again none have GA. What would a generic city history article have? "Founded"? - known in the US and AU, but nowhere else. "City status awarded"? - unique to UK. "Crest"? All very forced to my mind.

134:

to standardise the references, much more than I expected. You might want to look at that to see what's involved. I think it is a GA, except that very few people have contributed. I don't think I can nominate it myself, but I won't stand in your way <grin:

226:

because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (XXG) (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its

527:

rider as he has placed well in 1-2 week races. his problem is that he has failed to produce during the grand tours. while i accept that he is a time trial specialist he can often be his team's GC rider in shorter tours (paris-nice 2007 for example)

1280:

and came across the last paragraph in his personal life section. The the fan sites necessary to link to? (Though I believe quite a bit of the information provided stems from these sites.) Thus I can't decide if the external links should go or not.

352:

that way, all subsequent actions - balance, turn, tilt is a sum/interaction of these basic forces and thus will be much better to understand. i have made the same comment (in a much concise form) in the article's talk page under the GA comments. --

325:

Apologies for guessing re the Markham volumes. I wondered why else you would have supplied two identical citations? You have clearly marked them as different, you have two cites to the first and one to the second. So I'm still confused. Reason?

312: 264:

A disambiguation page is usually named after the generic topic (eg "Term XYZ"). "Term XYZ (disambiguation)" is not the standardized name for a disambiguation page, and is only used when there is a primary topic with an article at "Term

819:

You could have avoided the whole ruckus by simply abiding by the very standards you claim you are constantly promoting -or showing some basic humility before labelling people "troublemaker" whose expertise surpasses yours by far.

1395:

Also, I've just produced a county map for Buckinghamshire which will appear automatically in the place infobox. It should aid in bettering the presentation and context of Milton-and-Bucks related content! Hope that helps,

147:

to get a clean sheet on that to be even considered for GA. I suggest you do the same as we'll need to work methodically through the snag list. I think it needs Firefox, it is not working for me right now using IE.

720:

I take offence at your removal of my comment. It is a fact that blood doping has only fairly recently become detectable. Physiological facts likewise don't become non-facts because they are inconvenient for someone.

1189:

parameter. Unfortunately, I'm not sure what the best thing is to do about it? It's really useful to have photo requests categorized into appropriate subcategories, and with WPBiography articles, it seems like the

1327:

Tanks Severo for comment re Carrera, I was also thinking of making a page for Kelly's Skil team. If you have any suggestions for teams that made a big impact and would be a good story to tell please do give your

1151:

manual of style? Is that because it's from 2007 to 1941 instead of 1941 to 2007? -I have a bit of problem knowing how to edit cycling profiles(regarding achievements). Almost every rider has it's own style. Is

1204:, since it automatically causes photo requests to be classified the same way as the biography itself. So I hate to pass the buck, but I wonder if the right solution isn't for a skilled template editor to fix 1156:

edited in the proper way? -I think that in "Cycling race infobox" needs a section for the 'ranking' of the race(e.g. 1.1) -As you can see I'm quite a newbie in Knowledge (XXG), so sorry for the mistakes

1048:). Please do not use my talk page as a place to air your grievances, I frown upon such abuse of my talk page and will continue to remove what I have already and what has already been written elsewhere. 741:

The statement you referred to -the use of EPO- is sourced in the article. It mentions in-depth the research test done which showed he had used EPO. Something is only "libellous" if it is wrong in fact.

1445:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

669:

Thank you! How simple when you know all tiny little things... (I have discovered the Editorial Help, but have to digest it in small portions.) Of course I would not strike text in an article. /Regards,

493:

Severo will you take a look at the recent amends on Stephen Roche and let me know how I should respond? Wholesale chopping and particular amends around alleged performance enhancing drug use... Cheers

1346:

merely because it is short? It doesn't just cover bicycles. Perhaps you should have read the whole thing closely, rather than just leaving it to a bot. You might even be able to improve it.--

1387:

article. You mentioned something about finding a suitable structure to enable getting hold of GA and FA status.... well, as a project master (so to speak), you may or may not be aware that

460:

article, we've groomed and curry-combed the History article to within an inch of its life. The MK article is still a fairly scruffy pit pony with a long way to go to get close to GA! --

363:

Kewl, take your time. Though it has been some time since we started, i am OK in keeping the GA-hold for atleast one more week so as to give you sufficient time to address the comment. --

917:

Both amateur and professional boxing say it's 201, wbc or boxing boxrec are wrong, but they say over 200, so it's logical to assume 201 and more, so we do not need the word above 200.

640: 1242: 94:

Sure, after exams this week, I'll have plenty of time. Don't get too excited though, I ran the article through its paces last summer, and it didn't garner much attention. -

274:, I read that names should usually be disambiguated unless there is one clear recognised name worldwide. So, based on policy and guideline, I strongly disagree. Regards, 991:

200.5 that is rounded up to 201, so may be that's why the confusion, so 200.5 not 200.1 is heavyweight, because it's 91 kg. Simple as that. I thought you should know.

1044:

Please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of what you write. Please do no alter other's comments, as this is deemed unacceptable behaviour (see

286:

I think that, from a practical point of view, the cyclist is "a primary topic". Despite "Jan Janssen" being such a common name (indeed, it is the Dutch version of

788:

article, as a stub. Just letting you know I've added (and am adding) more content, including a photo, so you may want to reassess it sometime in the near future.

1439: 582:

It is discussed there, but in short I DO provide sources, you just didn't read them. They are part of the foot notes and external links. More discussed there.

898: 424:

Reading through the section again, I think we have to confess that there is a lot of opinion in it. These are what we have to source independently. --

1450: 1224:

so that the photo request box gets hidden along with everything else. (After all, this problem will arise whether or not it's the bot that adds

1446: 1454: 1313:, and tried to categorize it a bit, per the WP cycling project. Thought I'd check in with you and invite you to tinker with it. Cheers, -- 911:

This guy was told 100 times not to use boxinwear names or connect him with others, i can prove you he is wrong and he is a suspended member!

508: 1434:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to

1094:. I have only deleted abuse from my own talk page, if you feel you have relevant links please place them at the relevant place, namely 956:

If you want reliable sources, go to the governing bodies that regulate championship matches. Besides the WBC, there's the WBA ratings:

113: 1115: 1066: 1032: 998: 932: 174: 1208: 391:

Well, it certainly was an outstanding issue. Either way, just remember you can always renominate an article whenever you wish.

223: 1086:

is a core content policy on Knowledge (XXG), and this dismisses emailing random people to try to uphold your opinion. It is

1014:. Please cite reliable sources for your assertions. I have looked at reliable sources and they do not match your arguments. 835: 922: 311:

but never get round to digging out the references. If you have a copy of Markahm, maybe you could do it? Map with date

899:

http://www.wbcboxing.com/WBCboxing/Portal/cfpages/contentmgr.cfm?docId=94&docTipo=4&orderby=docid&sortby=ASC

801: 564: 586: 1358: 81: 76: 71: 59: 38: 1083: 143:

at about the 23 March 2007, you'll see how Gazman showed me how to run the automatic reviewer tool - the article

140: 925:

I also told mr mkil, if he wants to include 200 lbs, i have no problem, as long as he mentions wbc rules, only.

504: 131: 1295:

Hi, I've semi'd your page for two days. Please let me know if you want the protection lifted, or extended. ˉˉ

1119: 109: 1111: 1062: 1028: 994: 928: 496: 1070: 1036: 684: 378:

I think citing an entire section can take quite a while on your part. On hold is something I often do for

821: 743: 733: 722: 500: 485: 475: 1310: 1002: 936: 1431: 1388: 228: 219: 187: 1127:

Okay, this is my final response to you on my talk page. Don't threaten me with hollow remarks such as

687:

is certainly large enough. I don't know how to set up a WikiProject so if you do, please go ahead. --

1232: 1218: 1179: 1153: 883: 867: 702: 688: 461: 445: 435: 425: 413: 403: 327: 316: 191: 178: 164: 149: 1435: 1426: 1418: 1241:

I'm still testing the bot, so if you feel that I've underestimated the problem, please chime in at

755: 643:. I did not fully understand what you said in your edit summary. What can I do to fix the problem? 392: 383: 117: 610:

Looks like it works pretty good in English as well now, which wasn't always the case in the past.

271: 1347: 698: 95: 1459: 891: 1296: 1282: 1198: 1148: 620: 619:

Thanks for the barnstar, it's really much appreciated, although I work on here with pleasure.

611: 601: 186:

If you want to work on getting the main MK article to GA, it needs restructuring according to

1059:

system, so read and look at the links you deleted and print them, then read them carefully.

1045: 957: 1263: 1095: 1011: 795: 771: 762: 364: 353: 342: 308: 47: 17: 474:

Tried to ensure proper referencing footing to alleged EPO usage - is this now appropriate?

257: 1329: 864: 848:

I had to listen to the audio feed on the computer, so naturally had Knowledge (XXG) up ;)

713: 583: 568: 555: 539: 529: 205: 1091: 816: 1277: 670: 661: 232: 923:

http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php/Weight_divisions#History_of_the_Weight_Divisions

1384: 1374: 1314: 1172: 887: 839: 457: 1010:

Please sign posts on my talk page and keep discussion at the relevant place, namely

646: 291: 247: 1175:. I have noticed the problem with the folded banners not dealing gracefully with 1082:

read) what I can only deem to be reliable sources, which I feel you have ignored.

1485: 1482: 1465: 1411: 1366: 1363: 1350: 1332: 1317: 1299: 1285: 1266: 1260: 1249: 1161: 1135: 1132: 1102: 1099: 1052: 1049: 1018: 1015: 968: 948: 945: 904: 872: 852: 849: 842: 824: 805: 789: 774: 765: 746: 736: 725: 705: 691: 673: 664: 649: 623: 614: 604: 571: 542: 532: 488: 478: 464: 448: 438: 428: 416: 406: 395: 386: 367: 356: 345: 330: 319: 294: 278: 275: 250: 235: 208: 194: 181: 167: 152: 120: 98: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1406: 1399: 1158: 596:

Hey, I just saw your message asking for cycling sources. I almost always use

173:

Towards getting GA for the main MK article, it is worth studying today's FA,

965: 901: 1246: 986:

On the heavyweight page, we have this statement (before mkil destroys it)

287: 1430:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 914: 785: 204:

Thanks for adding the persondata temp on the page, much appreciated.

961: 882:

I've provided the anonymous user (who is, in reality, banned user

761:

Fine, keep your shitty grammar. I'm not the one who looks stupid.

538:

will you stop editing what i have added you annoying little twat.

434:

It'll fail again. There is still too much unsupported opinion. --

1343: 863:

Awesome! I was trying to figure out how to get that to work ;-)

341:

Hi., i left some GA review comments on the article's talk page.

597: 25: 231:, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 1383:

I came across your contributions regarding furthering the

958:

http://www.wbaonline.com/ratings/rankings/2007/wba0607.doc

683:

Well most other cities (ahem!) have one, so why not? The

1243:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/PhotoCatBot‎

834:

Wow, bro. A bike race result posted in minutes! (2007

1129:

this is your final warning not to play with me. got it

897:

For a cite, here's the World Boxing Council homepage:

578:

In case you don't see it (regarding BMX racing article

1108:

You are not following civility rules, you never did.

770:

I don't care. Like I said, keep your shitty grammar.

641:

List of teams and cyclists in the 2007 Tour de France

632:

List of teams and cyclists in the 2007 Tour de France

315:

though there is a standard template we should use. --

577: 1453:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 660:myself, except in ethics and etiquette, I mean!) / 1245:to make sure the issue doesn't go overlooked :-) 337:Bicycle and motorcycle dynamics - GA Comments 8: 1259:You're welcome, and thanks for spotting it! 256:Thanks for your comments, however I believe 697:To you goes the honour of announcing it at 382:minor things, not wholly uncited sections. 214:Copyright problems with Image:Aschleck.jpg 1167:Photo requests and WikiProjectBannerShell 978:Heavyweight and amateur heavyweights same 1424:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 108:There is discussion about deleting the 112:template. I thought you might want to 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 859:{{nowrap}} on Tour de France template 90:Bicycle and motorcycle dynamics again 7: 1194:parameter is a better solution than 1142:Cleanup on cycling articles by Drunt 915:http://www.usaboxing.org/92_1978.htm 567:I hope the articles are suitable, -- 1025:by others not to do it. It's rude. 1342:Have you tagged this article as a 1338:Editing Talk:Eccentric (mechanism) 1078:I have gone out my way and found ( 224:Knowledge (XXG):Copyright problems 24: 921:The history of weight divisions: 1471: 175:El Hatillo Municipality, Miranda 29: 1276:I was reading over the page of 962:http://www.ibf-usba-boxing.com/ 523:i think he is justifiable as a 1455:Media copyright questions page 1367:16:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1351:11:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1238:article!) What do you think? 712:Your removal of my comment at 639:I see you reverted my edit to 1: 1333:18:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 1486:17:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 1466:20:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 1451:criteria for speedy deletion 1412:23:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 830:Wow! Bike result in minutes! 565:Nissan International Classic 218:An image that you uploaded, 1318:13:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 1300:20:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 1286:21:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1267:19:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 1250:21:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1162:03:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 307:I've been meaning to write 1502: 1436:the image description page 1359:Talk:Eccentric (mechanism) 1136:21:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1103:21:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 1090:responsibility to provide 1053:21:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 1019:17:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 969:20:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 949:20:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 905:20:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 873:17:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 853:15:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 843:15:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 825:15:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 784:You recently assessed the 1438:and edit it to include a 806:18:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 775:14:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 766:14:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 747:09:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 737:07:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 726:16:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 706:17:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 692:12:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 679:WikiProject Milton Keynes 674:20:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 665:15:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 650:23:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 624:21:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 615:02:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 605:02:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 368:04:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 357:14:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 195:17:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 182:16:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 141:user talk:Concrete Cowboy 836:Clásica de San Sebastián 587:14:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 572:12:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 543:13:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 533:00:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 489:21:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 479:20:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 465:19:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 449:16:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 439:12:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 429:12:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 417:12:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 407:19:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 396:19:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 387:18:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 374:History of Milton Keynes 346:20:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 331:16:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 320:12:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 295:20:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 279:11:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 251:08:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 236:16:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 209:11:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 190:, which is a big job. -- 168:16:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 153:16:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 132:History of Milton Keynes 121:00:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 1417:Fair use rationale for 1122:) 21:12, August 9, 2007 1073:) 19:28, August 8, 2007 1039:) 19:19, August 8, 2007 1005:) 00:44, August 8, 2007 939:) 20:17, August 6, 2007 511:) 15:51, July 12, 2007. 130:I did a lot of work on 99:00:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 1309:Hey there. I created 1209:WikiProjectBannerShell 685:category:Milton Keynes 139:If you have a look at 1323:Defunct cycling teams 1311:Gran Prix de Fourmies 1171:Hi - thanks for your 1114:comment was added by 1065:comment was added by 1031:comment was added by 997:comment was added by 960:and the IBF ratings: 931:comment was added by 499:comment was added by 222:, has been listed at 42:of past discussions. 1291:Talk page protection 1154:Edvald Boasson Hagen 655:Hello from Keinstein 756:Talk:Mauricio Soler 484:Many thanks Severo 1440:fair use rationale 699:talk:Milton Keynes 647:Gary van der Merwe 220:Image:Aschleck.jpg 1149:Subida al Naranco 1123: 1074: 1040: 1006: 940: 878:Heavyweight limit 870: 512: 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1493: 1478: 1475: 1474: 1464: 1462: 1447:my contributions 1410: 1237: 1231: 1223: 1217: 1213: 1207: 1203: 1197: 1184: 1178: 1109: 1096:Talk:Heavyweight 1092:reliable sources 1060: 1026: 1012:Talk:Heavyweight 992: 926: 868: 792: 598:dewielersite.net 494: 309:Snelshall Priory 303:Snelshall Priory 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:User talk:Severo 1501: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1476: 1472: 1460: 1458: 1427:Image:Miche.gif 1422: 1419:Image:Miche.gif 1397: 1378: 1340: 1325: 1307: 1293: 1274: 1257: 1235: 1229: 1221: 1215: 1211: 1205: 1201: 1195: 1182: 1176: 1169: 1144: 1110:—The preceding 1061:—The preceding 1027:—The preceding 993:—The preceding 980: 927:—The preceding 880: 861: 838:) You rock. -- 832: 813: 790: 782: 759: 718: 714:Lance Armstrong 703:Concrete Cowboy 689:Concrete Cowboy 681: 657: 634: 594: 592:Cycling sources 580: 551: 521: 495:—The preceding 472: 462:Concrete Cowboy 446:Concrete Cowboy 436:Concrete Cowboy 426:Concrete Cowboy 414:Concrete Cowboy 404:Concrete Cowboy 376: 339: 328:Concrete Cowboy 317:Concrete Cowboy 305: 270:From this, and 243: 238: 216: 202: 192:Concrete Cowboy 179:Concrete Cowboy 165:Concrete Cowboy 150:Concrete Cowboy 128: 106: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1499: 1497: 1489: 1488: 1421: 1415: 1380:Hello Severo, 1377: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1339: 1336: 1324: 1321: 1306: 1305:GP de Fourmies 1303: 1292: 1289: 1278:Bentley Little 1273: 1272:Bentley Little 1270: 1256: 1253: 1168: 1165: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1106: 1105: 1056: 1055: 1022: 1021: 988: 987: 979: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 919: 918: 912: 879: 876: 860: 857: 856: 855: 831: 828: 822:213.209.110.45 812: 809: 781: 778: 758: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 744:213.209.110.45 734:213.209.110.45 723:213.209.110.45 717: 710: 709: 708: 680: 677: 656: 653: 633: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 593: 590: 579: 576: 575: 574: 550: 547: 546: 545: 520: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 501:Potato eater99 486:Potato eater99 476:Potato eater99 471: 468: 454: 453: 452: 451: 422: 421: 420: 419: 393:Alientraveller 384:Alientraveller 375: 372: 371: 370: 360: 359: 338: 335: 334: 333: 304: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 268: 267: 261: 242: 239: 217: 215: 212: 201: 198: 171: 170: 127: 124: 105: 104:Infobox needed 102: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1498: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1457:. Thank you. 1456: 1452: 1448: 1443: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1420: 1416: 1414: 1413: 1408: 1404: 1401: 1393: 1390: 1386: 1385:Milton Keynes 1381: 1376: 1375:Milton Keynes 1373: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1348:John of Paris 1345: 1337: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1304: 1302: 1301: 1298: 1290: 1288: 1287: 1284: 1279: 1271: 1269: 1268: 1265: 1262: 1254: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1227: 1220: 1210: 1200: 1193: 1188: 1181: 1174: 1166: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1141: 1137: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1084:Verifiability 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1020: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1000: 996: 985: 984: 983: 977: 970: 967: 963: 959: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 947: 941: 938: 934: 930: 924: 916: 913: 910: 909: 908: 906: 903: 900: 895: 893: 889: 885: 877: 875: 874: 871: 866: 858: 854: 851: 847: 846: 845: 844: 841: 837: 829: 827: 826: 823: 818: 811:Your comments 810: 808: 807: 803: 800: 797: 793: 787: 779: 777: 776: 773: 768: 767: 764: 757: 754: 748: 745: 740: 739: 738: 735: 730: 729: 728: 727: 724: 715: 711: 707: 704: 700: 696: 695: 694: 693: 690: 686: 678: 676: 675: 672: 667: 666: 663: 654: 652: 651: 648: 644: 642: 637: 631: 625: 622: 618: 617: 616: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 603: 599: 591: 589: 588: 585: 573: 570: 566: 561: 560: 559: 557: 548: 544: 541: 537: 536: 535: 534: 531: 526: 518: 510: 506: 502: 498: 492: 491: 490: 487: 483: 482: 481: 480: 477: 470:Stephen Roche 469: 467: 466: 463: 459: 458:Milton Keynes 450: 447: 442: 441: 440: 437: 433: 432: 431: 430: 427: 418: 415: 410: 409: 408: 405: 400: 399: 398: 397: 394: 389: 388: 385: 381: 373: 369: 366: 362: 361: 358: 355: 350: 349: 348: 347: 344: 336: 332: 329: 324: 323: 322: 321: 318: 314: 310: 302: 296: 293: 289: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 277: 273: 266: 262: 259: 255: 254: 253: 252: 249: 240: 237: 234: 230: 225: 221: 213: 211: 210: 207: 200:Cesc Fàbregas 199: 197: 196: 193: 189: 184: 183: 180: 176: 169: 166: 161: 157: 156: 155: 154: 151: 146: 142: 137: 133: 126:Good articles 125: 123: 122: 119: 115: 111: 110:Infoboxneeded 103: 101: 100: 97: 96:AndrewDressel 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1479: 1444: 1425: 1423: 1402: 1394: 1382: 1379: 1356: 1341: 1326: 1308: 1294: 1283:WarthogDemon 1275: 1258: 1240: 1228:to a nested 1225: 1191: 1186: 1170: 1145: 1128: 1116:64.107.1.212 1107: 1087: 1079: 1067:75.21.67.176 1057: 1033:75.21.67.176 1023: 989: 981: 942: 920: 896: 881: 862: 833: 814: 798: 783: 769: 760: 719: 682: 668: 658: 645: 638: 635: 621:Knurftendans 612:Knurftendans 602:Knurftendans 595: 581: 558:7 June 2007 552: 524: 522: 519:david millar 473: 455: 423: 390: 379: 377: 340: 306: 269: 263: 260:disagrees... 244: 203: 185: 172: 159: 144: 138: 129: 107: 93: 65: 43: 37: 1389:WP:UKCITIES 1357:Replied at 1233:WPBiography 1226:needs-photo 1219:WPBiography 1192:needs-photo 1187:needs-photo 1180:WPBiography 999:64.107.1.94 944:synthesis. 933:66.99.0.207 772:Nosleep1234 763:Nosleep1234 241:Jan Janssen 188:WP:UKCITIES 36:This is an 1330:Dawesaudax 1328:opinion!-- 1255:Re: Thanks 1247:Tim Pierce 1159:User:Drunt 884:BoxingWear 865:Cogswobble 584:Hunter2005 569:Dawesaudax 556:Dawesaudax 549:Sean Kelly 540:Chisa12345 530:Chisa12345 525:stage race 206:Chensiyuan 716:talk page 671:Keinstein 662:Keinstein 272:WP:MOSDAB 233:Not a dog 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 1432:fair use 1315:Dylanfly 1199:reqphoto 1173:comments 1157:Thanks-- 1112:unsigned 1063:unsigned 1029:unsigned 995:unsigned 929:unsigned 888:Projects 840:Dylanfly 780:7 Stanes 509:contribs 497:unsigned 288:John Doe 118:Timneu22 114:chime in 1214:and/or 1046:WP:TALK 982:Hello; 786:7stanes 292:Afasmit 248:Afasmit 39:archive 1483:Severo 1364:Severo 1133:Severo 1100:Severo 1050:Severo 1016:Severo 946:Severo 850:Severo 791:Lurker 365:Kalyan 354:Kalyan 343:Kalyan 276:Severo 258:WP:DAB 1400:Jza84 907:MKil 817:WP:RS 701:. -- 265:XYZ". 158:Well 16:< 1480:Done 1461:PxMa 1407:talk 1344:stub 1261:matt 1120:talk 1088:your 1071:talk 1037:talk 1003:talk 971:MKil 966:MKil 937:talk 902:MKil 892:Vesa 869:talk 802:done 796:said 505:talk 380:very 313:here 229:page 177:. -- 136:. 1398:-- 1185:'s 1080:and 636:Hi 145:has 135:--> 1442:. 1297:╦╩ 1264:br 1236:}} 1230:{{ 1222:}} 1216:{{ 1212:}} 1206:{{ 1202:}} 1196:{{ 1183:}} 1177:{{ 1098:. 964:. 820:-- 804:) 742:-- 721:-- 507:• 444:-- 412:-- 402:-- 326:-- 163:-- 148:-- 116:. 1477:Y 1409:) 1405:( 1403:· 1369:) 1362:( 1281:- 1147:- 1118:( 1069:( 1035:( 1001:( 935:( 890:/ 886:/ 799:· 794:( 503:( 160:I 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index