User talk:Skookum1/Archive 18

422:

next door that's mentioned to....they must be really notable in New West, I better make the articles" was the logic he advanced, if not in so many words. That there is a 'nest' of articles based around a certain group of people and most of them are non-notable ("yes they are, no they're not etc"), I'm just too old to be innocent.....what I'm seeing is a bunch of junk-content bios that are sole-authored and ridiculously UNDUE....if Columbia Street and New West had more articles about genuinely notable establishments and buildings, I never would have noticed these...and never would have been told to get a life for putting a notability tag on the grill article, at whicvh point rather than edit war I took it to the adminship...and why is it that nobody around here can see the harm in encouraging/tolerating "junk" articles....non-notable bios and the places those non-notable people eat and pray at. Is that what an encyclopedia is? I guess it's because I'm involved in more serious/deeper/older topics I find trivia by trivial people so frustrating and a waste of time.....so much real content is needed, so few are out there who even have half a handle on things that need to be covered, so much junk (and often rank OR like

2549:

articles because of some amateur linguist in the southeastern US deciding that native people don't have the right to assert whta they want to be called. For that huge amount of energy I lost my livelihood and wound up stressed out to the point of the stroke you know I had, partly as result. I do have a short fuse for stupidity and ignorance, and with good reason. I don't like my time being wasted, or ideologically-rewritten content being present as the truth and the only truth. That for the simple act of trying to make the category system more sensible and navigable, I got portrayed as some kind of destructive racist is just such utter horseshit is just not tolerable for me. Try to do something constructive and sensible, get painted as the White Devil. Fuck it I've said my piece....and will try to resist the temptation to bring common sense into Knowledge (XXG) ever again....let the revisionists and the ideologues hvae their way, and all the people who want to make drama out of the guideline-spewing and wiki-lawyering all they want. Scholastic people who understand teh

2544:

articles, many of them not even in IPNA topics, that what I've just been calld and accused of is grossly out of line. And nobody ever gets MY name right either (it's Skookum-one, "Skookum1" not "Skookum"). You and I get along, you are obviously a thoughtful, tolerant person; this isn't the first time I've encountered knee-jerk anti-white/anti-anglo intolerance from ideologically/ethnic-pride-driven editors (certain Chinese and certain French-Candian "contributors" come to mind); but it sure as hell is going to be the last. Fewer and fewer logical, broad-minded people are to be had around here. People toss protocols and guidelines around without even knowing what they mean, to defend asinine stupidity. I'm too old for this shit, life is only so long. You're welcome to touch base with me outside of this charnel-house of the mind, I'm going back to the real world. I also note that Uvysdi or whatever also voiced an ideological agenda in the Indian reserve RM, completely opposite to the facts on the ground, and there

839:

divisions are things like the Mining Districts and Forest Regions, RDs have only scant power and while relevant/necessary for census divisions, they have nothing to do AT ALL with highways. The best way to described BC geography is by the historical geographic regions, whose names are what all the administrative divisions are largely built upon. Using RD names gives the false impression that, say, the Similkameen and Boundary are in the South Okanagan, which they are not, or that the West Kootenay's proper name is Central Kootenay. Interpolating which regional district something is in, when it's not citable as such, is in fact original research and there's far too much of that going on. Look up a lake or a mountain in scientific texts; they'll name the region or mountain range, or the Forest District. Mines of course are classified by mining district, and are far beyond the not-very-strong municipal zoning relevance of RDs. And the primary cites for all places names, whether in BC Names or in CGNDB, are

1727:

not hobbled by the rules and haters and defensive/passive-aggressive behaviours that infest this place. UNDUE, OR/SYNTH, COI/POV and more are so rife here it will always be a sisyphean battle with irrelevance and arrogance and ignorance and more. I may continue to help out with the Commons and WikiVoyage and the like. But yes, the corporate witch-hunters are out there in force, and here as I explained to you elsewhere. That alone is the subject of a book or a news article...but "we" are not allowed to discuss Knowledge (XXG) in the press are we? And why is that, exactly, I wonder? Hm? This place has been "played" by the pros, I see so much evidence of it it's beyond troublesome to me now, I'm very matter-of-fact about it, but know better than to waste my time fighting a dragon without a magic sword and a ring of invisibility......never mind more than one dragon.

2411:

content in any way; my only comment that was even half-disparaging is the point that in Alaskan terminology even a hamlet of 50 people is legally a "city", and that includes non-native settlements. I helped wikify the Chief Shakes article and have worked to make sure that the clan articles were not deleted because they have 'non-English' names, and undertook to make sure various BC chiefs have been included, and called for more, and penned the Nicola's War content and Fraser Canyon WAr and more.... I've worked sympathetically on nearly every BC first people's content and sorted out the confusing political geography and terminology of overlapping tribal councils and ethnic groups and edited the anti-native content or pejorative cowboy-attitude on a lot of articles; I came back to Knowledge (XXG) after a long hiatus because of the racist cant that had overtaken the

592:

modern indigenous/authentic terms and call everybody what the Catholic Encyclopedia uses, and move aboriginal articles to "redskin" (still a common term)....sounds extreme, but that was the upshot of the RM debates against using the endonyms, that ti doesn't matter what the people call themselvs or what is culturally correct, it's Knowledge (XXG)'s Tyranny of the Ignorant that prevailed. I don't include you in that, just think that the actual material should have been considered, instead of blaming it on me, the proponent of a simple attempt to rid a category of cumbersome-to-use diacriticals. Instead we now have a category that, just you want, "people from teh town of Squamish" will get added to....and yet another reason for indigenous contributors to turn their noses up at Knowledge (XXG) (which OldManRivers, who

2510:, it covers both a geographic region AND a governmental entity as an overview, with many spinoffs later created for history governance, geographic features, etc. Same will be true of many tribes and tribal governments. So it isn't the end of the world if some articles will be categorized as BOTH a government and a geographical region. So let's all stop sniping at each other and if something is categorized in multiple areas, let's focus on navigation and helping people find related items, if that means some redirects, that's fine, and if it means we have multiple classes of categories in an article, that's fine. I'm normally kind of an anal-retentive person here, but both of you now have me so confused that I don't even really get WTF is going on any more. 2216:. Even in the Nevada categories which I guess maybe you have been seeing me active in, not all the tribe's communities are even in the same state; I don't see the reason for your objection to this, to me it makes complete sense from a classification and categorization system and reduces confusion about what belongs in which category. There are also compelling geographic and political realities in many cases, of which |I could provide a host of examples and show some benefits including the way Geogroup works even on redirected titles in various categories. 2383:

information about Native peoples to the public. When people are clicking on links in categories, they are looking for more information, which is in not redirects. The protocol link I gave you absolutely backs up my view, because all the categories used pertain to the articles. Many comments you've made disparage our tribal governments and reveal that you aren't very familiar with the sociopolitical structures of Alaskan villages or our reservations, Indian colonies, rancherias, and tribal jurisdictional areas. -

1248:

following my discussions with CJLippert you know that the term in USian categories "tribe" has wound up used both for peoples and for federally-recognized tribes. The unrecorded consensus from years ago was that conventions on such usages needed to be established and respected; our bad for not codifying them. I think you probably see my point that "First Nations" is not generalized as "nations", and that that term has complicated meanings in Canada and not just to do with FN peoples

2267:"infobox country", "infobox reservation", "infobox community"?? And know from certain WAshington and Oregon and Montana situations, what I'm talking about re Canadian reserves/bands/peoples in'st just a question of native political geography in CAnada...and I'll note again that it was as much American indigenous editors that evolved all these concepts way back when....and that there was an effort to come up with a system that worked on both sides of the US/Canadian border..... 2061: 1504: 1950:, though, is only the lower part of the Shuswap basin, the upper part is known as the Monashees (or Monashee Country, and once again that term includes areas south of the upper Shuswap River basin). This is breaking my vow of silence and my effort to break my addiction to this place, which has cost me some of my health. But rest assured "Nass Country" or "the Nass country" is a common term in BC historical and geographical and political writings; it is not 957: 731: 31: 1589: 2492:

obvious, and then taken it upon yourself to attack my motives, and my whiteness, that I can only adjudge you back as you hvae judged me; that you are an ignorant racist who will not listen to reason, and who believes that ideology is more important than logic. Or civility. I'm done with being civil. I should have known better than to come back to Knowledge (XXG). What a waste of Q@#$ %Q@$ #%Q$ # time and good-spirited energy. Sickening.

2070: 529:"people" tagged on, as was imposed by Wiki-homogenizers who knew nothing about the subject or the context. Nobody in that CfD was making sense but me, other than saying "you write too much" which isn't a valid comeback. If people hadn't been asking the same stupid questions and repeating the same stupid notions over and over, I wouldn't have had to respond as I did; this category is now not "synchronized" with the other 2052: 210:

was at least a contest winner, Sharon Gaetz a first female mayor...but do we need to know what she voted on and spoke on? In re Cindy Kovalak, "not happened yet" applies to "scheduled to be the plenary speaker at yada yada"......why is a teenage Nova Scotian so hot on promoting obscure BC restaurants, churches, and people connected to them, is my question? To me, informal COI is the obvious answer.

2262:

not geographically contiguous. How all this began, by the way, is because sometimes a tribe/government would only be present in a language or reservation category, or a reservation would only show up in a tribe/government category or even only in a language category. Mostly the language articles have now all been split off, and for the most part so have the people articles from e.g. the

1962:(the former term is also that of their government) but means much the same thing "Land of the Nass (River)". I won't come to the CfD, I don't have the time or energy, nor to browse through more googles or various books....the fishing books by Rod Bell-Irving (or one of the Bell-Irvings) are often about this area, which is why oen of the Nass tributaries is t he Bell-Irving River. 167:

population of around 50,000 or more, and thus Chilliwack clears the bar. (And even in a smaller place like Trail or Squamish or Kitimat, the mayor might still qualify if the article is well-written, genuinely informative and sourced really extensively — the ones I targeted for prod were either single-sourced or entirely unsourced stubs, but even then it was

646: 1396: 1064:

wide angle-to-telephoto anyway. Not much real scenery here, vegetation and building pics would be what it is. Here anyway; most snaps I take with my Samsung Galaxy Cooper (which is the local name for a Galaxy Ace, roughly equivalent to an iPhone 4 I think....my 4s got stolen in December, miss the two-way camera on that one...).

555:, but people treating guidelines and applying them willy-nilly without context or conssitency has put what had been a well organized series of article titles and categories into disarray; one reason they were orgnaized they were, as I said over and over again, is that in many cases, the anglicism is a well-known place name that 1019:

though)......if I ever get back to Lillooet and such, the thing to have, even as a digital, is a medium format at last....big scenics in that scale of country (monumental) need large negs/scans, partly so wide-angles don't have to be used to the same degree.....there's other things I'd appreciate wiki-grants for though LOL.

1891: 2106:

stubs if sections were moved right now, don't have to be in the long run, as they're about places that often have notable land history and other placename content that's just not been added yet. Where does it say that categories can include titles that don't have anything to do with the type of category that it is?

2199:

reasons why one government may have many pieces of land, or why many governments may share one piece of land. The information can be all in one article if need be, or if there is no substantial reason for there to be a reserve/reservation article independent of the band/tribe article. But when e.g. the

1983:

in which you will find its "cousin" categories. Not all have categories yet, and some have no main article as of yet; the time-consuming nature of erratica in Knowledge (XXG) prevented me from completing or sourcing all this; not original research, and all documentable...one reason I've pulled out of

1680:

posted on FB. Some of what he says about how the place has become process driven rather than content focussed hits home with a hammer. Myself, I think he's been overly polite. It's not just OR/SYNTH that's bothered me, it's overt COI/POV issues and inane misapplication of MOS and more that I won't

1247:

What had been in there wasn't band governments only, it was a random category; I'd just seen enough band governments in it and had wanted to get the name to conform to the existing standards/conventions...and wound up in a catfight with someone over that term. It's not just "nations", if you've been

926:

of regional districts but talk about mining districts, geographic things like ranges and terranes, and so on. Hospitals also are outside regional district government definition, and are classified by Health Region; schools by School Districts, and so on. Regional districts are used statistically, by

679:

discovered what the consequneces would be if Kwami's chauvinist imposition of anglicisms as supposedly "most common" and more led me to have to launch RMs and then found out the packthink that was going to make the categories renamed like Squamish has been and all of this would play over into article

596:

Skwxwu7mesh, has done because of the disregard shown for the talkpage discussions long in advance of the RM; all of which that RM ignored, even saying "well those people aren't around anymore so we can do what we want". Why not just delete history altogether and just write some nice-sounding fiction

591:

and/or from British Columbia or familiar with BC placenames - other than those other people who agreed with me, who were also ignored, themselves deluged by rubbish from the uninformed and rule-happy........following such a consensus of fools (and that's what it is) we might as well roll back all the

520:

I didn't have the name complete and that one's an aberration; with hte "Nation" on in wiki convention it means their government, not the people. The arguments in the RM that led to this was that it wasn't English and so didn't belong in Knowledge (XXG) were clearly counter-evidenced by the series of

158:

still improvable, and thus being less than completely perfect articles is not a failing. They do both pass on the basic criterion of notability and includability — and while Kovalak's certainly more of an edge case, the AFD has already been initiated as you know, so Wikipedians will be able to decide

2261:

bands, placing that template on the category for the reserves will display the reserve latlong markers even though they are on the target article not on the redirect. This would work with the Ta-Moak Tribe, whose reserves/colonies are about six, in two different counties and also in California, and

1749:

The following are the spaces I've been getting myself going on lately, which I should have spent much time on when labouring here with the pointlessly frustrating. Canoe1967 and Pfly already have these, might as well share them for those interested in who "the other skookum1 is". My choice to "out"

581:

I get really tired of hearing that *I* am the reason things are decided against what is right. yes, I'm long-winded, but that's because of the repetitious non sequiturs that get fielded over and over in such discussions; Kwami even tried to bait me on the RMs so that they would be decided in favour

314:

had is a perfectly valid article topic, no matter how uniquely "distinguished" you think they were or weren't, as long as the resulting article is properly sourced and says more than just "Sharon Gaetz is the mayor of Abbotsford." She doesn't have to have won a "best mayor in the world" award, or be

179:

In a nutshell, I'm not particularly seeing a pattern of negligence on Neelix's part here that would require an administrator to step in and chastise him for anything. If his behaviour ever actually goes in that direction, you can be sure that it will get dealt with — but based on the evidence you've

2557:

which is implicitly U-person's motives here, more and more of us have left or are leaving....... hell the world isn't going to last all that long anyway, all this will be stray kilobytes on a few microchips rotting in the radioactive brine by the end of the century anyway....... yes I'm ranting but

2239:

Is the land of the state of Illinois separate from Illinois? No. The legal status of indigenous peoples is entirely based on our connection to our land. There is no information about reservations in the redirects; all the information about reservations is in the article. If there isn't enough about

2105:

I'll have to remember where I first saw someone doing this, and why. It makes perfect sense to me to have the titles in a category match teh type of category it is. An organization being in a geography category, for example, makes no sense at all. It's also my opinion that a lot of what would be

1758:

affair anyway in the newspaper he works for (he should have been censured by the adminship but was not, and continues the pretense of his lies, including on scribd where his slanderous comments about me, and about Knowledge (XXG), remain, and any effort to comment/criticize there is censored by teh

1711:

I got your email but my hard drive was recently lost due to a corporate attack. I will respond here because I lost your email. I agree that your break/retirement has valid reasoning. I may retire soon if I get cash from similar corporations that hacked me, or they just decide it is easier to simply

1018:

Hm, interesting. I bought a Fuji Finepix HS30 in Bangkok which I've barely used so far, my old film Pentaxes are in storage in Nova Scotia and of course were expensive to use anyway (I used to do all my own black-and-white processing and printing...left my processing equipment in Burnaby years ago

693:

going on is cultural colonialism/imperialism. "Wiki knows best" = no, it doesn't. Yes, it's taken up a lot of time I wanted to create an expand articles for. But creating those articles without resolving the nomenclature problem I was already encountering problems and "WTF?" material. Don't you

460:

I've put my main reasons there and need not repeat them here, but in addition, IMHO you weaken your case – or at least make it less likely that the closer will find it persuasive – by going off in long essays. Feel free to write essays on sub-pages in your own user space, and linking to them in CfD

421:

for articles about the Heritage Grills and Five Stones in it, unless given a press kit listing the articles in some way? "Oh, I was reading this newspaper and this grill sounded like it needed an article because it had some screenings of a film on sex worker, and hey look there's this church right

2367:

the reservat that any effort to use the existing reservation/colony redirects for category sorting is somehow a violation of native culture. That's pretentious rubbish, period. The protocols that Uysvidi himself raised agree with and mandate what I have done; his position is not even supported by

1885:

I mean to have retired from this place, but all the BC historical geographic regions categories (which are far more relevant and current than subdividing the province by regional districts, whose names are often compounds of the traditional regions) were created by me. There's this funny thing on

1726:

I think I have a copy of what I sent you in my own email, I'll resend it. Been pondering adding a section here on the particular articles and issues that led to my frustration with this place....seems like a waste of energy, my writing powers should be applied to my survival and self-advancement,

714:

in that topic area except stand in the way of an obviously correct move of a government category to a name that reflected that; I can't remember who the closer was, I let him know the problems once it was closed; i.e. that what was in the category were band governments specifically, and that's why

684:

what it affected, didn't even change the ledes, then a bunch of "I'm going to apply this rule across the board" groupies came along and without any regard for context or purpose etc etc etc. All I see is people moving and changing names, or opposing same, and few of them, if any, have even a tiny

641:

OK, well if you've given up on winning friends and influencing people, I honestly suggest you spend your time on content rather than naming. The naming can be changed again in the future, and your content will be there all along. Think how much improvement you could have achieved in the time spent

209:

felt they were notable; and were all "nested" with the Tara Teng article and related evangelical "celebrities". What I see is a fan article, with endless small trivia and junk content, and a demonstration of over-cited garbage. Not encyclopedic, just done up in Knowledge (XXG) style....Tara Teng

199:

Rogue, no, but heedlessly bold and promotional for certain individuals, all of a certain religious persuasion/network. That you've edited Tara Teng surprises me, there's still scads of junk in that article, and I fail to see anything in Sharon Gaetz's article that distinguishes her from any other

2198:

I know exactly why I'm doing this. Because something called a "tribe" (government) is not the same thing as a piece of land. Something called a reservation does not belong in a category called "tribes" or vice versa. Something that is a government is not a geographic object; and there are many

1456:

Oh BracketBot, go back to Robotland, if you can't robot-yourself to fix stuff like that, and aren't smart enough to pick up the unneeded categories there, don't expect me to do your work for you. I nkow you're not programmed to do any better, but your author should be the one fixing those little

1063:

Mine actually has a pan function....works best with a tripod probably, I haven't had much use for it. think I paid 10000 baht, that's about 333 dollars......mostly got it for the zoom and it has video too. Not sure of the megapixelage at the moment, it's decent....lens doesn't detach but it's a

838:

What do you mean Environment Districts and Forest Districts are not well-known in BC? There's more signs for Forests Districts than there are for RDs, that's for sure (there's only RD signs at their boundaries, not throughout their regions). As far as tiers of power, second-level administrative

2548:

said that what is not actually the case is supposedly the case. That RM is why I came back, to make sure content was correct and not biased, same as I did because of Idle No More et al, and the same reasons I fought tooth and nail to keep the colonialist names from rewriting all the Canadian FN

2211:

or there are multiple bands on the same reserve as is the case on many of the big reserves in Ontario, or there are multiple communities on one reservation as is the case with Colville or multiple reserves/communities within one band government, as with Seton Lake or Squamish or Nicola, it makes

426:

on the one hand, someone else, another experienced editor, putting up major history articles for deletion as "fringe"...never mind, I know what the world is coming to.....has come to. Anyways, about Nlx, that he's lost three AfDs out of this nest, and another one is on the go, and the remaining

2543:

and it's clear to me that not-making-sense is now an unofficial Knowledge (XXG) credo. This isn't the first line of stubborn nonsense I've encountered around here, from all sides. I've done so much to defend and further native content and indigenous sensitivities across the board on countless

2491:

who does everything backwards..... you are making no sense at all, and being an insulting prick in the process. I'm done with being painted as Big Bad Whitey. You sicken me, and have picked open a wound in my impatience with "people with agendas" on Knowledge (XXG) wide open over somethign so

2419:

articles, and long before had made sure that various incidents in the history of white-native relations in BC got included; I also kept a Sinixt activist from removing Ktunaxa history and placenames and vandalizing the Ktunaxa articles, and more and more and more. So you can take your paranoid

2410:

article and made sure Tlingit content in BC-related articles like those pertaining to Russian America and the HBC was fair and complete; and though I haven't had time to continue the contact and develop the missing material on the Kaigani Haida, it's not like I've been out to "disparage" native

820:

Are you saying that BC has no second-level administrative divisions whatsoever? Regional Districts are a very reliable way to establish a geographic position relative to the whole province. Sure, Environment and Forest Districts are not well known in BC, but that is not the case with Regional

2382:

Canada is a nation-state of 35,158,300 people. Of course it will have more articles than any tribes. I'm not a him, as I've occasionally pointed over the years, and my user name is "Uyvsdi." In Muscogean languages the "v" is a nasalized "uh." My sole interest here is getting basic and accurate

2256:

so there's a case where the government and people do not directly equate as they might in some cases like the Crow. There are multiple Shoshone governments just as one Shoshone government might have multiple communities. I note in many of these the latlong of the communities are given in the

166:

large enough for its mayors to be considered notable in principle. The notability criterion for mayors is not nearly as restrictive as the one for city councillors — the only cutoff for mayors is that the city has to have at least "regional prominence", which is commonly understood at AFD as a

2266:

which has about six different peoples on it, though only one government...and some of those peoples also have other governments... clarity in the category system is all I am trying to accomplish..... and re the Yomba Reservation government....and your infobox issue, what should that have then

698:

by imposing standards created for other categories; Yes, unlike people who are here to become admins and otherwise use Knowledge (XXG) as social media and a coding club, I"m not here to make friends and influence people. I'm here to write geography and history, but find myself hobbled by the

868:

inherently original research. i.e. "who does that 'reliable establishing'? Certainly not any major sources (otehr than things that use Knowledge (XXG)'s mistake classification as if it were relevant to British Columbians (e.g. Googlemaps has done that, and others, but nobody thinks of, say

2140:

I still can't recall where I first saw this practice, after noticing some italicized titles in certain categories, but note Nae'blis' comments and the ensuing discussion in that six-year-old VP discussion, which underscore what I've been doing. starting at "While not all redirects should be

2538:

what I was trying to do; instead I was fed obscurantism, insults and a denial that what a protocol says is what it says. I'm done, I thought this was all simple and obvious, but I've been painted as Big Bad Whitey and don't need any of this shit. I don't get what is going on here

888:

more to the Regional Districts. Besides, look at the exit lists in the articles for some of the other highways in BC, such as 19 or 1. Do they list the Environment, Mining or Land Districts that each highway passes through? No they don't; they list the Regional Districts. --

2562:

me here, requires more than a simple "I'm done".....it's clear to me that common sense isn't welcome in Knowledge (XXG); rather the opposite. Over and over and over again. What could have been a great thing has now become maddeningly frustrating. Instead of telling

204:

is another such article, as is the "Mr World" one he's linked off the Tara Teng one. You may have been unaware of the Heritage Grill and Five Stones Church and the other church in Surrey, all of which got snowball deletes on AfD, other than his ongoing protests that

586:

mean I endorsed that; I can see that working up the guidelines in sandbox that eluded me in searches of IPNA archives (many of those discussions took place on individual talkpages and on user talkpages), and once again, the notable lack of anyone in the discussion

270:

he's been creating articles for; and seeing too much of a pattern for "negligence" to not be quite the right word; "promotional contrivance" is more like it.....making someone more notable than they are, as in Gaetz's case or Kovalak's or the "male beauty pageant

2460:. The protocol says straight out that redirects can solve problems associated with titles in categories not matching the type of category. And a government, a sociopolitical organized body, is not the same thing as the territory it governs. An organization is 1225:

I respect your concern to have NPOV category names. If that's the problem, then I suggest we nominate the whole category, or help create clear inclusion criteria and put them on the category namespace, rather than removing individual articles from the category.

2306:

I really hope you two can find a way to chill out here; I think you are both good editors. We might not be able to work out a continent-wide solution, so let's each let the person with the on the ground knowledge take the lead in their areas... can that work?

921:

say LAND DISTRICTS. Research papers on geology and mineralogy for mountains talk about Forest Districts/Regions, for provincial parks, which aren't governed by RDs, it's Environment Regions, for tourism items it's Tourism Regions. Mines in BCMINFILE make

175:

a valid article topic as long as the article is validly sourced and says more than just "Sharon Gaetz is the mayor of Chilliwack" — I removed one sentence from the article that was a bit of an NPOV issue, but the article as a whole is perfectly acceptable.

2571:? If he knows so much more, why isn't he expanding that content instead of pissing off someone who wsas making sure those titles were represented in the right categories properly. Done, done, done....so much more to say, but why the f**k bother anymore? 883:

Do you think regular people care about "scientific texts"? Do you think regular people have been frequently exposed to "Environment", "Mining", "Land", or "Forest" districts? I've never even heard of Environment or Mining Districts. I am exposed

2240:

reservation lands in the articles for your liking, then why not contribute more cited information to them? Obviously, US tribal situations are very different than in Canada. It doesn't matter if tribal lands span states. If an article is named

674:

I was working on content I started to see all kinds of text-changes resulting from the renamed articles, and also because I was going to create a lot of St'at'imc and Sto:lo articles and more that I ran into the diacriticalized categories and

334:. It doesn't require a vast conspiracy of somebody sending him encrypted propaganda by carrier pigeon; all one has to do is type "Tara Teng" or "Sharon Gaetz", or whoever else you're searching for sources on, into a Google search bar and 492:

I trust that you can see what I mean by "referring to forthcoming evidence that didn't materialise." Better not to mention it at all, than to say you are waiting to hear from someone or intend to look something up and then not deliver.

2466:

a geographic item. In your biased edit comments, yuou indicated that I had done something required the articles needed to be "restored" after, which is insulting and NUTS. The content had not been damaged; but you put those articles

1773:

I don't know which of the following mainstream social media/musicians websites is blocked by Knowledge (XXG), the nowiki I just added should solve that problem. I'm tired of being net-nannied, whether by bots or by guideline-crazed

1895: 2362:

categorization. The redirects exist, and it's perfectly legitimate to categorize redirects so that the categories have properly-named links in them, not POV-driven obscurantism which is what claiming that because the government

361:

unless he starts violating Knowledge (XXG)'s conduct policies because of it (which as of today I can't see any evidence that he has)? I've gone back over the past couple of weeks of his edit history and virtually all of his last

1622:

And no, the boilerplate on that template says I'll be back soon; again, a robot putting words in my mouth. Have fun with the future, I'm glad I'll die before the rest of you have to live in the insanity you're creating around

1793:

What you can't say in words is best said in music; so many of my songs are songs-without-words, or speaking in tongues. "What has not already been discussed here I must pass over in silence" - paraphrase of the conclusion of

1354: 180:

given I'm not seeing any substantial evidence that he's been editing in bad faith. He's been around here for a long time (first edit 2006) and has built up a pretty solid record as a contributor (I don't think I've

1350: 159:

one way or the other (and even though her notability might be questionable enough to warrant an AFD discussion, I certainly wouldn't have considered it either speediable or proddable in its existing form.)

582:

of his own arbitrary and unjustified speedies.....TLNDR is insulting for those of us not raised in the point-form education system. Yes, I did say that about "I could live with Squamish people" that did

154:

I have, for the record, already seen and done a bit of cleanup on both Sharon Gaetz and Tara Teng. While both articles might need some attention in the longer term, every article on Knowledge (XXG) is

2350:

especially when the simple solution of properly-named redirects is available. Nevada categories cannot be treated in isolation, or they will be used by someone else for somewhere else. Consistency

2015:

I just really wanted express my gratitude for all you do. I don't know if a barnstar or a badge would even be appropriate to express my heart-felt gratitude, so I decided just to say "Thank you!!".

2471:. A government, doesn't matter whether it's a tribe or band government, does not belong in a geographic category; something called a Tribe does not belong in a category called "Reservations". In 715:

the name change. But no action to change his mind, he's gone off to close other discussions he doesn't know f-all about either, and my opponnent has yet to show his face on a Cree-related article.

326:

Secondly, regarding your question about "how was it he even knew about the Burnaby Now newspaper, and why was he reading it, if not for some COI connection and someone sending him the material?",

266:

And yes, though it's not personal, if it wasn't for his edit-commenting "get a life" during the "template wars" on Heritage Grill and Five Stones Church, I wouldn't have taken an interest in what

1658:

I am sorry to see you go as well. I have considered it myself a few times but decided to stick around and keep fighting the battles. Many we will lose but those can be fought again another day.--

1526: 390:

of people roll on here, so I really can't see any concrete reason to jump to the conclusions that you're jumping to about his editing patterns. If he ever commits a serious wikisin, then it

2402:

Man you are reading things into my other comments in completely a reactionary, paranoid way. Disparaging? Um, I don't know what the F**K you're talking about; I helped straighten out the

1830: 1533:, for having picked "up the garbage too often", and for leaving us "Consensus does not mean that stupidity and ignorance be given equal weight to common sense and knowledge." - You are an 614:

Just scanned your RfA and talkpage a bit; what I see and hear, all too much, everywhere, is Knowledge (XXG)'s own internal policies and wiki-culture influencing content and article naming

244:

Re Tara Teng and the "Mr World" ("male beauty pageant winner", not a bodybuilder as that name is usually for), since when does "encyclopedic content" mean that articles more suited to

126:

It kinda looks like Robson, but it's not. Lots of errors in titles there, though usually transcription errors, that name seems pretty clearly what was tagged on the image....maybe it

689:, familiar with BC or Canada, supported my moves. Those that did not were from beyond the place, one even denounced me for being locally parochial, when really what was going on and 622:

it. I have no interest in being an admin; the process strikes me as somewhat like the Spanish Inquisition's search for heretics. I see no reason to be conciliatory to those who are

1457:

bits instead of bugging people....if he can program you to find them, he can program you to fix them. I wonder, does he /she even write any articles or is he just into writing code?

1595:

going to live in the real world and stop having to combat the rise of ignorance and OR and SYNTH throughout Knowledge (XXG). I feel the last eight years of my life have been wasted

694:

get it? And what I saw was years of previous work and discussion thrown in the trash bin by a group of arrogant younglings; lazy ones, too, changing category names they don't even

489:

Well, there isn't, and never has been. You'd only have to type "category:tsuu" in the Search box, even while you're still typing, for the actual current category name to pop up.

457:. It required a considerable investment of time to read and weigh what you had written, and a little less for everybody else, so I hope some additional feedback will be helpful. 1115: 1828:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 454: 2161: 1163: 469: 1111: 2483:

support your reversions, nor your invective against me as if I were some kind of racist pig out to undermine native content. Your views are ideological and not logical and

386:

evidence at all that he's doing anything except writing new articles about topics that happen to cross his radar while he's working on related topics — and that's the way a

1159: 927:

StatsCan and BCStats, to define the boundaries of census subdivisions and things like the Development Regions (which are composites of three-five regional districts. They

1338: 1918:

for example all span more than one river basin, as does the Boundary Country; others like the Nicola Country are more or less identical with the namesake river e.g. [[:

680:

content as people by passed redirects and so on and so on and so on. A child came into the sandbox, moved the blocks to where he thought they should be, didn't give a

909:

that you're in such-and-so regional district? I see Forest District signs all the time, big honking ones, not those little 24" RD signs....in any case, if a citation

2086: 547:

For all the talk about consistency, what I see is conflicting guidelines invoked without any over-arching view/understanding, resulting in these categories now being

357:

any personal connection to any evangelical movement or fundamentalist church or whatever. It's certainly possible that he does, for all I know — and even if he does,

1759:

Sun's editors, who did not report on the sabotage attempted on the BC Liberal Party article after that, either. Claims of neutrality from him were completely bogus.

521:

non-English and atypical spellings I provided in my last post there. This isn't over, t he whole "FOO people" namespace collision has go to be resolved, and it was

1980: 1252:

governments. Clarity is my aim; instead I'm thrown obfuscations with poeple who just don't know the material, or have bought into one side or the other...of many.

2335: 1695:

We've never talked but I've seen your work/contributions and I sincerely hope this is a well-deserved Wikibreak and you'll return one day when the time is right.

974: 744: 2241: 777: 864:

such things, as they are not ordinarily citable as just noted, means that presuming that they are "reliable geographic descriptors" is just not right, and it

1003:

Your input seems to indicate that you could provide some good images depending on where you are. You may also know others that are worthy of a good camera.--

1364: 1099: 787: 773: 1914:......often seen in print with small-c, but always meaning region, sometimes (but not always) synonymous with "X Valley". The Lillooet and Omineca and [[: 1139: 840: 530: 171:

fact, more than the size of the town itself, that constituted the difference between a prod and a pass.) But for a city the size of Chilliwack, a mayor

1187: 1135: 1518: 1183: 917:; knowing that it's in the Okanagan or Similkameen or Cariboo is a completely different, intuitive matter. The citations for geographic items 655: 501: 184:

seen a userpage with as many barnstars on it as he has), so I'm not seeing any reason at this point to believe he's suddenly gone rogue on us.

1835: 626:

and who pass judgements on subjects and topics that they have zero real interest, and are more interested in rule-flogging and wiki-careerism.

559:. But noooooo, nobody acknowledged that; other than other people from the region who knew the truth, said so, and also were ignored.......... 1360: 1095: 783: 2248:

I don't see your reason for opposing the category redirects the way I've been applying them; and in the protocols you just sent me there's

2358:

clued into Uysvidi's particular perspective were treated as though I had vandalized the articles or changed them in someway other than

2283: 2249: 2180: 1088:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

394:

get dealt with when it happens — but as things currently stand, he's done nothing that would require a sanction from an administrator.

2368:

the protocol he himself raised. Why not just merge all the reservation and tribe categories altogether then? For Nevada only maybe??

1534: 1992:. I must stress thsi is not SYNTH or OR, but simply reporting on what I know to be the case from growing up in BC...See some of the 2244:, then yes, the reservation is part of the article's subject matter. Why not write an article? -05:50, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Uyvsdi 1522: 1514: 710:

For example, all that stuff about Cree nations and my vociferous and culturally/politically clueless opponent there, He's done

306:"special" than most other mayors — if a given city meets or surpasses Knowledge (XXG)'s standards of regional prominence, then 2183:. Geography cats are not maintenance cats. All the information about the reservations are in the articles not the redirects. - 2120: 1673: 1357:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 780:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 552: 378:

are connected to her via either the beauty pageant circuit or her human rights work, rather than being connected via the same

1800: 1236: 1107: 1092:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 525:

by someone ignoring the established IPNA-derived consensus that endonyms for the peoples vs anglicisms for their governments

2089:. Whenever I find a redirect with categories, I remove them. Could you direct me to any WP protocols that encourage them? - 1887: 2069: 1155: 1045:

is one of the largest at almost 16 gigapixels. The unit only costs 299, 449, and 895 depending on how big your camera is:

94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 315:

the first mayor belonging to a certain underrepresented group, or anything else that would make her some sort of special

2327: 1903: 533:

components, and it's been decided by people (a) not from British Columbia and (b) not involved in any of these articles.

2160:

I have no idea why you are doing this. There are so many crappy stubs that need fleshing out and plenty of redlinks at

464:

It also seemed to me that you were sometimes taking offence where none was intended, and doing that at length too. See

2252:

which underscores what I have been doing. And I note that many of the tribe-governments in question are those of the

2204: 814: 517: 1988:

books published on things being lost to modernization and forgotten by newer generations.....and then y'all can cite

1089: 2339: 1337:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

756:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

737: 730: 661: 516:

No it doesn't. We now have a category whose name's primary meaning is "people from the town of Squamish". As for

507: 38: 1943: 1899: 1947: 1935: 1915: 1911: 1639: 1638:

Sorry I didn't know you sooner: what you say makes so much sense, - enjoy the future. I started the year with "

447: 2479:

the Protocol from the guidelines, there is ample material underscoring and mandating what I did and that does

1919: 1907: 1562: 1419:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1303: 2487:

in accordance with the protocols you claim support you. You are talking backwards, like that character in

2200: 1898:

will get you started. "X Country", whether capitalized or not, is a common BC English term for a region.

295: 227: 1939: 1931: 1927: 1647: 1570: 1545: 1481:

I think you may be able to find appropriate places to infuse this link into various appropriate articles.

985: 963: 956: 1599: 1824: 1530: 757: 651: 497: 2354:. And I'm offended, still, that my efforts to improve categorization for the easy use of other people 2282:

And on that same set of protocols if there weren't good reasons for categories to be used this way, it

475:

To me it's bizarre that you spend ages typing a long response and then leave redlinks within it, e.g.

481: 2343: 2323: 1857:

is. If you feel up to making an article explaining that which could be linked to the category with a

1446: 894: 826: 1955: 323:

a mayor of that city has to do to be notable enough for a Knowledge (XXG) article is to be a mayor.

2263: 2020: 1993: 1959: 1717: 1663: 1486: 1276: 1054: 1008: 201: 116: 2454:. You claim that the protocol you cited mandates your reversion of my work but you're completely 2257:

article; if I understand/remember GeoGroupTemplate correctly, and think I've used it this way for

2208: 2060: 1854: 2576: 2497: 2373: 2291: 2272: 2221: 2146: 2128: 2111: 2001: 1967: 1809: 1764: 1732: 1686: 1628: 1613: 1462: 1322: 1299: 1257: 1232: 1131: 1069: 1024: 936: 874: 848: 720: 704: 631: 602: 569: 538: 432: 427:

articles are UNDUE in extremis....you mean to tell me you don't see a pattern? Because I do.....

276: 257: 235: 215: 139: 47: 17: 1503: 699:

half-knowledge and rule-happiness of a bunch of half-educated children obsessed with guidelines.

2567:

to write articles, why didn't U-person go and write some about Wells Colony and Campbell RAnch

1000: 618:, and rather peremptorily, with the effect of Knowledge (XXG) influencing reality, rather than 370:

hit albums and singles — and when I do finally get back to ones that are directly connected to

1861: 1643: 1566: 1541: 1380: 1284: 1211: 981: 803: 399: 189: 2554: 2388: 2188: 2169: 2094: 1751: 1588: 1179: 465: 2253: 2039: 1755: 1442: 1400: 891: 823: 2322:

my area, as are political/organizational articles. It would make no sense at all to see

2511: 2416: 2308: 2016: 1922:

is the main article's name (now) and note quite often the main article and category do

1713: 1659: 1482: 1269: 1050: 1004: 319:

among past mayors of Abbotsford — if a city is large enough, which Abbotsford is, then

112: 2164:

and elsewhere. The article has all the information; the category has no information. -

230:

on another non-notable mayor/politician article, why is Sharon Gaetz exempt from that?

108: 2572: 2493: 2369: 2331: 2287: 2268: 2217: 2142: 2124: 2107: 1997: 1963: 1872: 1853:

More at CfD, of course, but this largely hinges on there being no indication of what

1843: 1805: 1760: 1728: 1682: 1624: 1609: 1458: 1371:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1318: 1253: 1227: 1202:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1194: 1065: 1020: 932: 870: 844: 794:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

769: 716: 700: 627: 598: 565: 534: 428: 272: 253: 231: 211: 135: 2580: 2516: 2501: 2392: 2377: 2313: 2295: 2276: 2225: 2192: 2173: 2150: 2132: 2115: 2098: 2051: 2043: 2024: 2005: 1971: 1876: 1847: 1813: 1768: 1736: 1721: 1706: 1690: 1667: 1651: 1632: 1617: 1574: 1549: 1490: 1466: 1450: 1384: 1326: 1307: 1288: 1261: 1241: 1215: 1073: 1058: 1028: 1012: 989: 970: 940: 900: 878: 852: 832: 807: 724: 664: 635: 606: 573: 542: 510: 436: 403: 330:

is not even the least bit hard to find in the age of this nifty little thing called

280: 261: 239: 219: 193: 143: 120: 2412: 2258: 1795: 1376: 1372: 1280: 1207: 1203: 799: 795: 461:

discussions etc, but please try and stay on-topic there. Sometimes "Less is more."

395: 185: 2447:

Furthermore, this bit about there being nothing in the redirects is true because

2384: 2212:

completely perfect sense either to use redirects in the appropriate categories;

2184: 2165: 2090: 765: 423: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1038: 2035: 761: 200:

councillor or mayor, other than she was the first female mayor of that city.

162:

Unlike some of the smaller towns whose mayors I targeted for prod, Chilliwack

2553:

of an encyclopedia and the need for inclusion for everyone, not using it as

1677: 371: 2087:

Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (technical)/Archive AP#Redirects in categories

2085:

All I can find about placing redirects into categories is this discussion:

2214:

so that categories don't have titles that don't belong in those categories

1001:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/Grants:IdeaLab/Cameras_for_Commons_photographers

455:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2013 May 4#Category:Squamish

1868: 1839: 1696: 1408: 2507: 2407: 1170: 1146: 1122: 1034: 1042: 1033:

I thought about upgrading to larger format DLSR but then I discovered

869:

Revelstoke Canyon Dam as being in Columbia-Shuswap B or D or whatever.

1979:

Note also that this category is a great-great-grandchild category of

1681:

bother elaborating on, I'm only meaning to drop in to post that link.

1412: 1346: 1342: 331: 2346:. Putting government names in reservation and geographic categories 1046: 999:

Have you got a decent camera? If not you may wish to keep an eye on

1580:

wikibreak - so much garbage, so much twaddle, such a waste of time

860:- a not so reliable way, and considering that Wikipedians have to 1037:. A robotic mount that makes huge images from many smaller ones. 109:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/User_talk:Canoe1967#While_I.27m_here

913:

the regional district in it, then researching which one it's in

472:; see the discussion on the talk page, if you can be bothered.) 1786:* (one of seven myspace pages, none of them updated recently) 1583: 25: 2506:

OK folks, here's my thinking: if we take an article such as

453:

Hi Skookum, you'll probably be disappointed at my closure of

977:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

955: 747:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

729: 2558:

the ridiculousness of what has been thrown at me, directly

366:

hundred edits involve copyediting and cleaning up lists of

252:, but their articles are never even 1/10 as long as Teng's. 1561:

You may be interested in the deletion proposal related to

1039:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/Category:Created_with_Gigapan

2475:

the things you found, the Village Pump debate from 2007,

1478: 353:

And finally, I cannot find any firm evidence that Neelix

107:

I think I found Moose Canyon near Jasper. Details are at

858:"a very reliable way to establish a geographic position" 685:

grasp of the content that they're affecting; those that

1420: 1416: 1404: 1341:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 1314: 760:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 597:

that goes by "most common" terms from the last century?

468:

and meditate on it! (I learned more about that during

2207:, or when multiple bands share a single reserve like 1529:

and their languages, for the factual moving story of

1277:

Talk:Whitebark pine#Requested move to scientific name

294:

Just to address a couple of points: firstly, to meet

2162:

Classification of indigenous peoples of the Americas

1437:

Category:Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest

2284:

wouldn't have been set up so it was possible at all

1415:by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just 1339:List of place names in Canada of aboriginal origin 1427:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 1981:Category:Geographic regions of British Columbia 1942:though that also includes an area known as the 1750:myself, I was disastrously and meanly outed by 1298:How did you find that recent edit by AnomeBot? 1049:There are probably cheaper knock-offs though.-- 484:, I think it is, for the Alberta Blackfeet...." 2336:Category:Indian reserves in the Lower Mainland 1333:Disambiguation link notification for August 21 130:the one in the Premier Range....or a mountain 2242:Yomba Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba Reservation 1084:Disambiguation link notification for August 4 551:consistent, because of imposed "standards". 8: 752:Disambiguation link notification for July 20 2469:back in categories where they do not belong 962:Hello, Skookum1. You have new messages at 736:Hello, Skookum1. You have new messages at 1275:You are welcome to join the discussion at 931:and should not be treated as if they were. 531:Category:First Nations in British Columbia 111:..... The McBride one is still a puzzle.-- 1896:"nass+country"&start=10 some of these 1603:and will be back on Knowledge (XXG) soon. 2330:. It would make no sense at all to see 2047: 342:come up in the search if there is any. 2181:Knowledge (XXG):Categorizing redirects 298:, a mayor does not have to somehow be 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1934:categories are subcats of a category 1510:indigenous common sense and knowledge 1403:. I have automatically detected that 7: 1938:which is nearly synonymous with the 1926:match nor shoudl they have to. the 1557:Professionals - notice of discussion 1517:, for quality articles for projects 643: 2203:has reserves that are nowhere near 1984:Knowledge (XXG) is so as to get my 1477:I thought you may appreciate this: 1043:http://gigapan.com/gigapans/116906/ 2030:High horses for your consideration 24: 1513:Thank you, hacker of Beethoven's 1047:http://gigapan.com/cms/shop/store 2068: 2059: 2050: 1587: 1502: 1394: 644: 496:Hope this helps. Best wishes! – 29: 2179:Finally found the protocols at 1886:the internet called Google, so 1268:Discussion of article title of 642:bashing your head on the wall! 2075:I'll never not post this file. 1814:06:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC) 1801:Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 1769:06:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC) 1737:05:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC) 1722:20:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 1707:21:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC) 1108:Montana Indian Reserve No. 139 417:......who did he even know to 1: 2044:20:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2025:15:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 1691:08:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 1668:18:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 1575:17:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 1156:Samson Indian Reserve No. 137 382:. So I still have yet to see 226:And given your invocation of 2581:04:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2517:21:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2502:04:33, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2393:17:46, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2378:17:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2328:Category:Geography of Canada 2314:08:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2296:06:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2277:06:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2226:05:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2193:05:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2174:05:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2151:04:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2133:04:46, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2116:04:45, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2099:04:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 2006:10:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 1972:10:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 1904:Category:Similkameen Country 1877:18:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 1848:18:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 738:Fayenatic london's talk page 2420:defensiveness and shove it. 2205:Dog Creek, British Columbia 1672:Logging in briefly to post 1652:22:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 1633:03:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 1618:03:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 1550:09:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 1491:17:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 1467:16:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 1451:16:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 1385:11:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 1327:02:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 1308:02:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 1289:04:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 815:British Columbia Highway 33 707:) 01:48, 17 July 2013 (UTF 2596: 2340:Crow Tribal Administration 1867:, I'll likely withdraw. -- 1262:16:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 1242:14:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 1216:23:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC) 670:YOu don't get it. It was 518:Category:Tsuu T'ina Nation 413:You missed my point about 350:before. Welcome to 2013. 1944:Category:Columbia Country 1936:Category:Kootenay Country 1900:Category:Lillooet Country 1836:Categories for discussion 1193:added a link pointing to 1169:added a link pointing to 1145:added a link pointing to 1121:added a link pointing to 1074:04:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC) 1059:04:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC) 1029:03:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC) 1013:19:35, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 990:03:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 971:03:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 941:03:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 901:22:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 879:07:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 853:07:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 833:06:38, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 808:10:54, 20 July 2013 (UTC) 725:01:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 665:19:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 636:09:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 607:09:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 574:04:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 543:04:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 511:20:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 437:19:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 404:18:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 248:are the result? I'd say 144:03:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 121:19:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1948:Category:Shuswap Country 1912:Category:Omineca Country 1525:, especially caring for 964:Michaelzeng7's talk page 448:Category:Squamish people 281:11:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 262:11:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 240:11:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 220:11:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 194:21:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC) 2532:Ease of navigation was 2081:Categories on redirects 1908:Category:Nicola Country 1563:Category: Professionals 1421:my operator's talk page 589:familiar with the topic 2449:that's what redirects 2334:(a tribal council) in 1940:Kootenay Land District 1932:Category:East Kootenay 1928:Category:West Kootenay 1920:Category:Nicola Valley 1479:http://maps.fphlcc.ca/ 960: 734: 2348:makes no sense at all 2201:Dog Creek Indian Band 2121:WP:There are no rules 2034:Here's a few more. -- 1825:Category:Nass Country 1819:Category:Nass Country 1531:Endre Johannes Cleven 959: 758:Hiawatha First Nation 733: 553:WP:There are no rules 480:"this is why there's 42:of past discussions. 2344:Geography of Montana 2324:Government of Canada 2123:is the Fifth Pillar. 1954:synonymous with the 1831:the category's entry 1790:twitter: @bigskookum 1411:may have broken the 1373:opt-out instructions 1204:opt-out instructions 1090:disambiguation pages 915:is original research 905:Do those exit lists 796:opt-out instructions 557:is the primary usage 310:mayor that city has 2264:Tulalip Reservation 1994:Talk:Lower Mainland 1355:fix with Dab solver 1188:fix with Dab solver 1164:fix with Dab solver 1140:fix with Dab solver 1116:fix with Dab solver 778:fix with Dab solver 482:Category:Tsuu T'ina 1640:letting go of past 1597:is taking a short 1535:awesome Wikipedian 1527:indigenous peoples 1363:• Join us at the 1132:Samson Cree Nation 1098:• Join us at the 975:remove this notice 961: 813:Your reversion to 786:• Join us at the 745:remove this notice 735: 103:Moose Canyon found 18:User talk:Skookum1 1916:Cassiar Countries 1838:page. Thank you. 1745:time better spent 1607: 1606: 1368: 1240: 1221:re:Cree "nations" 1103: 791: 302:distinguished or 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2587: 2514: 2311: 2072: 2063: 2054: 1866: 1860: 1752:User:Sunciviclee 1712:drop a hammer.-- 1704: 1591: 1584: 1519:British Columbia 1506: 1436: 1398: 1397: 1358: 1351:check to confirm 1230: 1184:check to confirm 1180:Skihist Mountain 1160:check to confirm 1136:check to confirm 1112:check to confirm 1093: 978: 929:are not counties 899: 831: 781: 774:check to confirm 748: 658: 649: 648: 647: 504: 359:so the hell what 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2595: 2594: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2512: 2406:content in teh 2309: 2254:Shoshone people 2083: 2076: 2073: 2064: 2055: 2032: 2013: 1996:discussions.... 1864: 1858: 1821: 1756:Talk:Adrian Dix 1747: 1697: 1582: 1559: 1554: 1553: 1507: 1498: 1475: 1432: 1395: 1392: 1365:DPL WikiProject 1335: 1296: 1273: 1223: 1100:DPL WikiProject 1086: 997: 979: 968: 953: 890: 822: 818: 788:DPL WikiProject 754: 749: 742: 656: 645: 502: 451: 346:cited stuff to 250:People Magazine 152: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2593: 2591: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2504: 2489:Little Big Man 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2417:Theresa Spence 2300: 2280: 2279: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2067: 2065: 2058: 2056: 2049: 2031: 2028: 2012: 2009: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1956:Nisga'a Lisims 1880: 1879: 1820: 1817: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1709: 1693: 1670: 1655: 1654: 1605: 1604: 1592: 1581: 1578: 1558: 1555: 1512: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1497: 1494: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1439: 1438: 1429: 1428: 1391: 1388: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1317:, easy enough. 1313:In the page's 1295: 1292: 1272: 1270:Whitebark pine 1266: 1265: 1264: 1222: 1219: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1041:has examples. 996: 993: 969:Message added 967: 954: 952: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 881: 841:Land Districts 821:Districts. -- 817: 811: 753: 750: 741: 728: 668: 667: 612: 611: 610: 609: 563: 562: 561: 560: 487: 486: 450: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 151: 148: 147: 146: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2592: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2561: 2556: 2552: 2547: 2542: 2537: 2536: 2518: 2515: 2509: 2505: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2465: 2464: 2459: 2458: 2453: 2452: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2418: 2414: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2366: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2338:, nor to see 2337: 2333: 2332:Sto:lo Nation 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2312: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2243: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2197: 2196: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2177: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2141:categorized". 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2080: 2071: 2066: 2062: 2057: 2053: 2048: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2029: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2010: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1982: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960:Nisga'a Lands 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1863: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1827: 1826: 1818: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1797: 1791: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1757: 1753: 1744: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1694: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1602: 1601: 1596: 1593: 1590: 1586: 1585: 1579: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1538: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1511: 1505: 1495: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1417:edit the page 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1389: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1369: 1366: 1362: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1300:Kirothereaper 1293: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1238: 1234: 1229: 1220: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1196: 1195:Anderson Lake 1192: 1191: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1148: 1144: 1143: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1091: 1083: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 994: 992: 991: 987: 983: 976: 972: 965: 958: 950: 942: 938: 934: 930: 925: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 903: 902: 898: 897: 893: 887: 882: 880: 876: 872: 867: 863: 859: 856: 855: 854: 850: 846: 842: 837: 836: 835: 834: 830: 829: 825: 816: 812: 810: 809: 805: 801: 797: 792: 789: 785: 779: 775: 771: 770:Buckhorn Lake 767: 763: 759: 751: 746: 739: 732: 727: 726: 722: 718: 713: 708: 706: 702: 697: 692: 688: 683: 678: 673: 666: 663: 660: 659: 653: 640: 639: 638: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 608: 604: 600: 595: 590: 585: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 571: 567: 558: 554: 550: 546: 545: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 519: 515: 514: 513: 512: 509: 506: 505: 499: 494: 490: 485: 483: 478: 477: 476: 473: 471: 467: 462: 458: 456: 449: 446: 438: 434: 430: 425: 420: 416: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 360: 356: 351: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 324: 322: 318: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296:WP:POLITICIAN 282: 278: 274: 269: 265: 264: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 246:Sweet Sixteen 243: 242: 241: 237: 233: 229: 228:WP:POLITICIAN 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 217: 213: 208: 203: 202:Cindy Kovalak 198: 197: 196: 195: 191: 187: 183: 177: 174: 170: 165: 160: 157: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 110: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2568: 2564: 2559: 2550: 2545: 2540: 2534: 2533: 2531: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2462: 2461: 2456: 2455: 2450: 2448: 2413:Idle No More 2403: 2364: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2319: 2299: 2281: 2250:this section 2238: 2213: 2209:Peckquaylist 2139: 2084: 2033: 2014: 1989: 1985: 1978: 1951: 1923: 1855:Nass Country 1829: 1823: 1822: 1799: 1796:Wittgenstein 1792: 1788: 1785: 1782: 1779: 1776: 1774:wikipedians. 1772: 1748: 1699: 1698: 1644:Gerda Arendt 1621: 1608: 1598: 1594: 1567:Ottawahitech 1565:. Regards, X 1560: 1542:Gerda Arendt 1539: 1515:3rd concerto 1509: 1508: 1476: 1440: 1433: 1393: 1370: 1336: 1297: 1274: 1249: 1224: 1201: 1087: 998: 982:Michaelzeng7 980: 928: 923: 918: 914: 911:doesn't have 910: 906: 895: 885: 865: 861: 857: 827: 819: 793: 755: 711: 709: 695: 690: 686: 681: 676: 671: 669: 654: 623: 619: 615: 613: 593: 588: 583: 564: 556: 548: 526: 522: 500: 495: 491: 488: 479: 474: 463: 459: 452: 418: 414: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 367: 363: 358: 354: 352: 347: 343: 339: 335: 327: 325: 320: 316: 311: 307: 303: 299: 293: 267: 249: 245: 206: 181: 178: 172: 168: 163: 161: 155: 153: 134:McBride, BC? 131: 127: 106: 75: 43: 37: 2259:Tsilhqot'in 1754:during the 1399:Hello, I'm 1390:August 2013 995:WMF project 766:Pigeon Lake 424:Quadripoint 415:Burnaby Now 348:Burnaby Now 336:Burnaby Now 328:Burnaby Now 36:This is an 2318:Geography 1789:<p: --> 1443:BracketBot 1401:BracketBot 1375:. Thanks, 1206:. Thanks, 973:. You can 924:no mention 919:invariably 798:. Thanks, 762:Stony Lake 620:reflecting 470:my own RfA 374:, many of 95:Archive 25 87:Archive 20 82:Archive 19 76:Archive 18 70:Archive 17 65:Archive 16 60:Archive 15 2513:Montanabw 2310:Montanabw 2195:Uyvsdi]] 2017:CJLippert 2011:Thank you 1958:, or the 1714:Canoe1967 1678:User:Pfly 1674:this link 1660:Canoe1967 1600:wikibreak 1483:CJLippert 1405:your edit 1359:Read the 1094:Read the 1051:Canoe1967 1005:Canoe1967 782:Read the 652:Fayenatic 498:Fayenatic 372:Tara Teng 368:Billboard 338:coverage 113:Canoe1967 2573:Skookum1 2494:Skookum1 2370:Skookum1 2288:Skookum1 2269:Skookum1 2218:Skookum1 2143:Skookum1 2125:Skookum1 2108:Skookum1 1998:Skookum1 1964:Skookum1 1862:cat main 1806:Skookum1 1761:Skookum1 1729:Skookum1 1683:Skookum1 1625:Skookum1 1610:Skookum1 1523:Thailand 1496:Precious 1459:Skookum1 1441:Thanks, 1409:Eulachon 1319:Skookum1 1294:Question 1254:Skookum1 1237:contribs 1066:Skookum1 1021:Skookum1 951:Talkback 933:Skookum1 892:Denelson 871:Skookum1 862:research 845:Skookum1 824:Denelson 743:You can 717:Skookum1 701:Skookum1 628:Skookum1 599:Skookum1 566:Skookum1 535:Skookum1 429:Skookum1 317:standout 273:Skookum1 271:winner". 254:Skookum1 232:Skookum1 212:Skookum1 136:Skookum1 2569:himself 2555:WP:SOAP 2535:exactly 2508:Montana 2408:Tlingit 2395:Uyvsdi 2352:matters 2176:Uyvsdi 2101:Uyvsdi 1946:. The 1834:on the 1377:DPL bot 1315:history 1281:hike395 1208:DPL bot 1171:Hobbema 1147:Hobbema 1123:Hobbema 1035:Gigapan 800:DPL bot 712:nothing 672:because 616:wrongly 527:without 396:Bearcat 364:several 186:Bearcat 39:archive 2541:EITHER 2385:Uyvsdi 2360:fixing 2185:Uyvsdi 2166:Uyvsdi 2091:Uyvsdi 1676:which 1413:syntax 1347:Haisla 1343:Stoney 1228:Kevlar 523:caused 466:WP:AGF 380:church 332:Google 156:always 150:Mayors 2551:point 2457:WRONG 2404:kwaan 2036:Pitke 1952:quite 1642:". -- 662:ondon 624:wrong 508:ondon 16:< 2577:talk 2546:also 2498:talk 2473:BOTH 2415:and 2389:talk 2374:talk 2292:talk 2273:talk 2222:talk 2189:talk 2170:talk 2147:talk 2129:talk 2112:talk 2095:talk 2040:talk 2021:talk 2002:talk 1968:talk 1930:and 1910:, [[ 1894:and 1892:this 1890:and 1888:this 1873:talk 1844:talk 1810:talk 1765:talk 1733:talk 1718:talk 1687:talk 1664:talk 1648:talk 1629:talk 1623:you. 1614:talk 1571:talk 1546:talk 1521:and 1487:talk 1463:talk 1447:talk 1381:talk 1345:and 1323:talk 1304:talk 1285:talk 1258:talk 1233:talk 1212:talk 1070:talk 1055:talk 1025:talk 1009:talk 986:talk 937:talk 886:much 875:talk 849:talk 804:talk 768:and 721:talk 705:talk 682:shit 677:then 632:talk 603:talk 570:talk 539:talk 433:talk 419:look 400:talk 392:will 376:them 344:I've 340:will 312:ever 304:more 300:more 277:talk 268:else 258:talk 236:talk 216:talk 190:talk 182:ever 169:that 140:talk 132:near 117:talk 2485:not 2481:NOT 2477:and 2463:NOT 2451:ARE 2356:not 2342:in 2326:in 1986:own 1924:not 1869:BDD 1840:BDD 1798:'s 1473:Map 1407:to 1361:FAQ 1279:. — 1096:FAQ 907:say 784:FAQ 696:use 687:did 584:not 549:not 388:lot 384:any 355:has 321:all 308:any 2579:) 2565:me 2560:at 2500:) 2391:) 2376:) 2365:is 2320:is 2294:) 2275:) 2224:) 2191:) 2172:) 2149:) 2131:) 2114:) 2097:) 2042:) 2023:) 2004:) 1990:me 1970:) 1906:, 1902:, 1875:) 1865:}} 1859:{{ 1846:) 1812:) 1783:* 1780:* 1777:* 1767:) 1735:) 1720:) 1703:iz 1689:) 1666:) 1650:) 1631:) 1616:) 1573:) 1548:) 1540:-- 1537:! 1489:) 1465:) 1449:) 1434:[[ 1423:. 1383:) 1353:| 1325:) 1306:) 1287:) 1260:) 1250:or 1235:• 1226:-- 1214:) 1190:) 1186:| 1166:) 1162:| 1142:) 1138:| 1118:) 1114:| 1072:) 1057:) 1027:) 1011:) 988:) 939:) 896:83 877:) 866:IS 851:) 828:83 806:) 776:| 764:, 723:) 691:is 650:– 634:) 605:) 594:is 572:) 541:) 435:) 402:) 279:) 260:) 238:) 218:) 207:he 192:) 173:is 164:is 142:) 128:is 119:) 91:→ 2575:( 2496:( 2387:( 2372:( 2290:( 2286:. 2271:( 2220:( 2187:( 2168:( 2145:( 2127:( 2110:( 2093:( 2038:( 2019:( 2000:( 1966:( 1871:( 1842:( 1808:( 1804:. 1763:( 1731:( 1716:( 1700:L 1685:( 1662:( 1646:( 1627:( 1612:( 1569:( 1544:( 1485:( 1461:( 1445:( 1379:( 1367:. 1349:( 1321:( 1302:( 1283:( 1256:( 1239:) 1231:( 1210:( 1182:( 1158:( 1134:( 1110:( 1102:. 1068:( 1053:( 1023:( 1007:( 984:( 966:. 935:( 873:( 847:( 843:. 802:( 790:. 772:( 740:. 719:( 703:( 657:L 630:( 601:( 568:( 537:( 503:L 431:( 398:( 275:( 256:( 234:( 214:( 188:( 138:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index