97:
them but noticed some still weren't tagged, and some aren't tagged with film in general. Then it got the better of me and I feel like I have to finish this process to get a better idea of how many need infoboxes. It's a little deceiving when it looks like there's 1,000 left to do but there's actually now about 3,000 plus I would expect how it's going, another 2,000 or so (that's about a quarter of all film articles). This then gives a far more accurate view of how many are outstanding (but as you pointed out, this process has already been done by country, which means a sub project would them be to match year/country categories). Once years are done, I guess there's still all the other categories too (and the new ones being added). The main thing was to know if I was doing it right, not stuffing something up or tagging the wrong articles (such as novels etc). Thanks again. I really shouldn't be doing this though, I have too much other work to do, very distracting... :)
543:
13:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Hi, I see already 370 articles in cat:articles that need a cast section. I think it's not a good practice to put this in the article pages. That's usually talk page categories. I'm affraid you guys will hear from the overcategorization deletionists and all your work will be
96:
Thanks for the notes. That's essentially what I'm doing, just defining class, needs infobox, and filmimage I guess I should do the other tags while I'm at it! The reason I'm going through is because I was just checking by year and noticed a few missing, and I wanted to start updating infoboxes/adding
67:
I agree we need consistency between the film articles so for the new articles I am producing now I will start to list the cast as a simple list rather than as a table. I do think it might be worth starting a discussion at some point about these at WP film talk but for now I am more interested in just
562:
and change the text, image and the category it assigns and create it. But you have to talk with the others and make sure they all agree and do the same. Mind you also that there are others who want to hide all the talk page templates as clutter, so you may not gain much. So let's say I don't advice
85:
Hi, I noticed you've gone through some of the pages I've been tagging and was just checking to see if I'm doing the right thing and not wasting everyone's time!! I'm just going through all (or at least most!) to check for infoboxes and images (or lack thereof) and am not sure of the procedure with
192:
Yeah, I was talking about that. And I thank you. I only remember watching it like 100 times when I was younger, and so I did not know much on it. I have searched for a DVD or a copy of the VHS but to no avail. It is barely anywhere, though in hopes of sparking new interest I created that page. I
33:
Hi Skier, about undoing cast tables, I often feel tempted to undo some, but there are MANY such tables. My suggestion is that we take a clear decision in WP Films talk, on which we could base a more general cleanup of such tables when we find any. The problem is that the very film suggested as an
532:
I dont' think as yet there is a category for missing cast but I feel it an important addition if so. Many articles only mention one of two actors not the cast and characters played -this should be regarded as important as the others, We should propose it at WP Film talk see what others think
152:
THanks skier wow you get around. thanks for info boxing that welsh film - I think we have just come across the film director Helen herself - she has won BAFTA awards for her welsh films and is putting the films on wikipedia -if it is her she only lives about 10 miles away in
86:
some films, I expect they all should have infoboxes and posters/screnshots etc. I'm alos not sure if I should be tagging tamil or indian films under wikiproject film or india cinema. Please let me know if I'm stuffing up a process in place or making it harder for people?
315:, which I created. Could you tell me how I could improve it ? Basically I gathered all the names that belonged to the category and then organized them a bit. Now that the category is gone, I want that list to look good. Thank you very much for your help.
345:
108:
I was wondering whether cartoons, and anime are considered part of the wikifilm project, or are they under a different category? I feel they are but have left some as I'm unsure, they already appear to have an established infobox and wikiproject.
544:
wasted. It's good what you are doing, but if it's not too late I would suggest moving it to the talk pages. Also with all the requests for infoboxes and the people that left the effort, do you think this might get any following?
563:
one more template. The important thing is they will appear all in the talk page category, even without template. The down part is you will have to click twice to reach the article page itself, but it might save your work.
516:
THis is a quite brilliant idea -excellent job. YOu are so efficient!!!!!! THe only thing which might be useful perhaps is "needs cast details". Often many articles don't have an adequate cast section. What do you think?
558:
you don't even have to make a template for it, just put the cat in the talk pages. But if you want to make one, just copy the code from {{filmimage}} (edit it and copy-paste) in your
405:
Yeah, it's a good first step. Unfortunately, since A-D is still working on subbing the movie, I can't contribute myself for a good long time. ^_^ Well, off to tipsy land,
494:
The category will not empty! It's the very same category the tamplate is assigning. But instead of finding the articles in the category, you will find their talk pages.
623:
591:
Good to see it has been created -I can go through that category now when I feel like and add cast sections to articles. Keep up the great tagging Mr Skier!
344:
and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found
269:
124:
Yeah, I'm expecting a long series of reverts until eventually someone cracks. It's already started, I'll be posting messages on the talk pages.
281:
341:
613:
Thanks for finishing of those last few years of tagging for me mate :) I was starting to go a little loopy there for a minute :)
376:
209:
467:
577:
I'm suggesting you just move the category from the main pages to the talk pages, without creating a template for it.
312:
277:
238:
230:
592:
534:
518:
158:
634:
559:
441:
I asked
Matthew about it. I hope we find the proper way soon. If template is required, I'll do it for you.
197:
139:
38:, has such a table. It may be that it's not as easy as just stating style guidelines for removing them.
641:
617:
601:
586:
572:
553:
527:
503:
488:
460:
450:
436:
413:
400:
387:
370:
352:
329:
319:
285:
242:
167:
142:
128:
113:
101:
90:
72:
61:
47:
273:
234:
17:
226:
582:
568:
549:
499:
484:
475:
446:
383:
I'm a little confused about how this isn't a film, seeing as that it was released in theaters. ^_^
349:
57:
43:
201:
393:
264:
218:
638:
205:
432:. Requests like that should also be templates so they're not included within article forks.
364:
362:
I wonder if film should be used for movie. I always thought film is verb and movie is noun.
326:
316:
429:
614:
110:
98:
87:
68:
getting wider film coverage and it is maybe something we can all discuss in the future --
630:
578:
564:
545:
495:
480:
471:
442:
222:
53:
39:
35:
185:
479:
19:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC) And don't let any others keep on the other way, please!!
457:
433:
69:
298:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Black_Cut&diff=prev&oldid=121611661
292:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Black_Cut&diff=prev&oldid=121611332
456:
The talk page would probably be the best place for it, you can self ref. there.
410:
397:
384:
52:
I'd be glad to support it when you raise the issue. Good going, by the way!
125:
406:
173:
154:
428:
Please stop -- that's not how you request edits, it's a violation of
394:
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=3446
340:
As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on
229:
for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the
138:
I'm afraid that the stub does not seem to register. Sorry--
392:
Yeah, IMDB can be dumb that way. Will an ANN link do?
297:
291:
34:
infobox example in the WP Films Style guidelines, i.e.
233:
to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
221:
on
Knowledge (XXG). Your test worked, and it has been
263:
the text. I was recorded in the history removing it.
624:
Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/Ananthabhadram/archive1
259:to the articles history. So I wrote of the test. I
466:Ok, here is your maintenance talk page template:
303:Thats OK. Who put it back in? I'm investigating…
8:
377:Konjiki no Gash Bell!!: 101 Banme no Mamono
217:Thank you for experimenting with the page
252:In what was written, you added a tag
7:
174:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1635707/
342:List of publications in philosophy
24:
637:. Would you care to take a look?
468:Template:Film needs cast section
193:thank you very very much <3
313:List of Highlander cast members
307:List of Highlander cast members
311:Thank you for having assessed
1:
409:sending me to la la land ^_^
657:
642:05:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
618:01:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
602:11:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
587:18:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
573:18:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
554:18:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
504:19:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
489:19:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
461:18:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
451:18:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
437:18:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
414:07:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
401:07:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
388:06:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
371:07:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
353:17:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
330:08:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
320:14:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
286:05:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
243:05:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
528:01:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
168:01:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
143:22:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
129:19:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
114:01:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
102:01:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
91:01:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
73:09:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
62:15:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
48:07:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
81:use of the film template
225:or removed. Please use
470:. Have a nice slalom.
560:User:SkierRMH/Sandbox
272:comment was added by
18:User talk:Skier Dude
176:This is who it is.
585:
571:
552:
502:
487:
478:
449:
289:
214:
200:comment added by
60:
46:
648:
599:
581:
567:
548:
541:
525:
498:
483:
474:
445:
367:
267:
213:
194:
165:
140:Anthony.bradbury
56:
42:
656:
655:
651:
650:
649:
647:
646:
645:
627:
611:
596:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦
593:
538:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦
535:
522:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦
519:
514:
426:
380:
365:
360:
338:
309:
290:I have proof. *
274:The WikiWhippet
268:—The preceding
250:
235:The WikiWhippet
195:
190:
162:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦
159:
150:
136:
122:
83:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
654:
652:
631:Ananthabhadram
626:
621:
610:
607:
513:
510:
507:
506:
464:
463:
425:
422:
419:
418:
417:
416:
390:
379:
374:
359:
358:Film vs. Movie
356:
337:
334:
333:
332:
308:
305:
301:
300:
249:
246:
189:
182:
180:
178:
177:
149:
146:
135:
132:
121:
118:
117:
116:
105:
104:
82:
79:
76:
75:
36:The Terminator
30:
27:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
653:
644:
643:
640:
636:
632:
625:
622:
620:
619:
616:
608:
606:
604:
603:
600:
598:
597:
589:
588:
584:
580:
575:
574:
570:
566:
561:
556:
555:
551:
547:
542:
540:
539:
530:
529:
526:
524:
523:
511:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
477:
473:
469:
462:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
439:
438:
435:
431:
423:
421:
415:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
399:
395:
391:
389:
386:
382:
381:
378:
375:
373:
372:
369:
368:
366:≈Tulkolahten≈
357:
355:
354:
351:
348:. Thanks. -
347:
343:
335:
331:
328:
324:
323:
322:
321:
318:
314:
306:
304:
299:
296:
295:
294:
293:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
262:
258:
255:
247:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
187:
186:P.J. Sparkles
183:
181:
175:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
164:
163:
156:
147:
145:
144:
141:
133:
131:
130:
127:
119:
115:
112:
107:
106:
103:
100:
95:
94:
93:
92:
89:
80:
78:
74:
71:
66:
65:
64:
63:
59:
55:
50:
49:
45:
41:
37:
28:
26:
19:
639:Aditya Kabir
628:
612:
609:year tagging
605:
595:
594:
590:
576:
557:
537:
536:
531:
521:
520:
515:
508:
465:
440:
427:
420:
363:
361:
339:
336:List of pubs
325:Thank you !
310:
302:
260:
256:
253:
251:
231:welcome page
216:
191:
179:
161:
160:
151:
137:
123:
84:
77:
51:
32:
25:
635:peer review
327:Rosenknospe
317:Rosenknospe
227:the sandbox
196:—Preceding
148:Welsh films
29:Cast tables
629:Submitted
120:ROMANESQUE
579:Hoverfish
565:Hoverfish
546:Hoverfish
512:need cast
496:Hoverfish
481:Hoverfish
472:Hoverfish
443:Hoverfish
424:AWB edits
257:Bold text
219:Black Cut
54:Hoverfish
40:Hoverfish
350:KSchutte
282:contribs
270:unsigned
223:reverted
210:contribs
198:unsigned
458:Matthew
434:Matthew
407:Lunesta
261:removed
202:Nikamuu
155:Cardiff
70:Amxitsa
633:for a
430:WP:ASR
411:JuJube
398:JuJube
385:JuJube
265:Check.
615:Peter
184:Yeah
111:Peter
99:Peter
88:Peter
16:<
583:Talk
569:Talk
550:Talk
500:Talk
485:Talk
476:Talk
447:Talk
346:here
278:talk
239:talk
206:talk
134:Stub
58:Talk
44:Talk
396::)
254:and
248:???
157:!!
126:WLU
284:)
280:•
212:)
208:•
188:^^
288:.
276:(
241:)
237:(
204:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.