User talk:Skyes(BYU) - Knowledge (XXG)

1257:, at our university's library there is a hard copy of the DVD; however, I do believe that an online archived version of the video is no longer available. It might be better to use another source if it's necessary to include an accessible link to an online available video. Otherwise, I can check out and watch the video to confirm that the source contains the information in question about the Temperance movement. Regardless, I might watch the video and include information anyway, because the documentary is about the history of the Latter-day Saints in the British Isles and it may contain valuable information about the Temperance movement in accordance with Latter-day Saints. 3894:

minimal. Charlie Chaplin is a wonderful article that I have frequently used as a model article for FA standards. I am familiar with your work on Knowledge (XXG) and I considered contacting you to ask for feedback, but I have had little luck finding mentors on Knowledge (XXG) willing to help so I appreciate your reaching out. As experienced as you are with the FA review process, I would love to have as much feedback and advice as you can give me! If you would be willing to mentor me, I would appreciate it but if you don't have the time or interest, I would be happy to at least have some feedback and direction. Thank you so much for reaching out.

4314:) 22:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC) EDIT: I also want to clarify that while I have been working on the legacy section in your sandbox, I have come across things in my research that better fit in the Acting Style and Screen Persona section which I have added to the article itself, because I wasn't sure whether we were still going to be working on it in your sandbox and I didn't want any of my work to be lost. If you still want to go through that section in a detailed manner, I can recopy and paste it back in the sandbox with my new additions. 3478:, I'm glad you liked the article; I sure put a lot of effort into it. Strangely, I've never actually seen a James Stewart film but felt myself becoming a fan purely from working on the article. I nominated it for GA, so you are welcome to complete a Good article review for the article if you please. Otherwise, I wanted this article reviewed regardless because I would like to try and promote it to a featured article and wanted a thorough review. So, by all means, you are welcome to complete a review. Thanks for your interest! 3954:, I think it looks really good! The article flows better and more logically and I love the images you added! Let me know if you need anything while reviewing the Military service section. I personally, think it's way too long (even though I've already trimmed it extensively) and could use some more trimming but I know so little about military history and the military in general, it's a section that I frequently avoid working on. Thanks again for your help, you're a superstar editor and I love your writing style. 1871:, I have not yet abandoned the Temperance Movement, but have become recently engrossed in articles about film. I will return eventually...I still have the books sitting on my desk. I do have a quick question for you. I have been taking your suggestions to heart and have been implementing them in my article, but I am a little unsure about what you mean with the international copyright tags. How do I add them and in what situation do I need them? 123: 4083:

early life goes, there are A LOT of gaps. I couldn't find anything on commons and even a google search only brings up like one or two pictures with Pinterest as the source. My special collections department has some of his papers, perhaps I can see if they have anything of use that would be okay to scan and upload. Also, sorry, I only just noticed your questions about the military service section. Do you still have those questions?

2433: 1814:, my vacation was very nice, but I am happy to be back on Knowledge (XXG) making more contributions! Thank you so much for your advice and willingness to look at my article and give me specific suggestions. I was not expecting that and I really appreciate it! I will take your suggestions seriously and will try to find a mentor since this is my first nomination. Thank you again and good luck with your articles! 505: 5310: 4349: 2529: 5034: 4742: 4483: 3816: 2136: 1690: 1059: 802: 1427: 5215: 5120: 4828: 4624: 3646: 3558: 3198: 3098: 2673: 2347: 2255: 1298: 956: 680: 444:, thanks for letting me know. I've taken care of fixing the speedy deletion request (the template wasn't eligible for db-g7 because only the nominator can use it, and needs to be used without the "tl|" part (which is what causes a template name to be displayed rather than the actual template itself), so it's now a g6 instead of a g7. I imagine it will be deleted overnight. 3059: 2601: 2221: 1179: 1132: 1097: 557: 358: 4975: 3451: 2450:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 4588: 3522: 3413: 3358: 2065: 1844: 1639: 890: 615: 4270:

focusing on Stewart's method of acting (although that too is significant), we also need content that analyses why Stewart played the characters he played, and why these were popular. I'd assume there's plenty of academic writing especially on Stewart's everyman persona and his westerns. As for the Legacy, that also needs a bit more work in terms of

3999:

agree with the changes I've made, I'll move the content to the article. I decided to change the 1950s career section to one chronological section, I think it's easier to cut unnecessary detail that way (no need to repeat anything) and that way it's easier to grasp the chronology of that era in Stewart's career. Anyway, let me know what you think!

1237:, but i couldn't get the video running. Perhaps you could get the video from their archives or something. Otherwise, I will have to replace the link with a more accessible source. It's a fascinating subject, temperance. Just learning more about it now. Have been adding some content to the article already.-- 3998:

So my plans for tonight got cancelled and since I've gotten bitten by the Knowledge (XXG) bug again, I decided to do as much of the Stewart article as I can! You can view the rest of the Career and the Personal life sections in my sandbox. I've left questions bolded. Once they are answered and if you

3913:

and comment there. Hope it's not too confusing! Don't be discouraged by how many comments I've made, I'm just trying to be as thorough as possible. Maybe we can start working on the article, section by section, in my sandbox? I'd ask Ssven2 (he is your GA reviewer, right?) whether he can do a review

3860:

I see you've done some great work with James Stewart's article and are trying to get it to GA status (to be honest, it already looks FA-level to me!). One thing I noticed was that the text could perhaps be tightened a bit, i.e. some details could maybe be cut and some paragraphs shortened or split. I

923:

With regard to the sfn template, please note that if the source has not author, you need to use the {{harvid}} template and add it in the ref parameter, as I have done in your article. Furthermore, each source in the source list needs to be formatted with a {{citation}} template, rather than a {{cite

472:

You do explicitly disclose on your userpage which is great, and you took the effort to include "BYU" in your username which is also great (and yes a huge hint... but people don't always catch the username thing). It is best to just say it simply, whenever you are interacting with a new group. So it

4207:

Some kind soul had added images from Stewart's childhood and Princeton years to Commons! I can try to look into this major general-thing, the Air Force magazine article mentions it, not sure if it's a reliable source though? It seems to have been an honorable position. Anyway, have a lovely weekend!

4058:

2.) The other issue is images. Have you got a plan for this? Have you uploaded images on Commons? Commons has some very high quality photos of Stewart but there are also massive gaps. I think the most pressing needs are photographs of his westerns with Mann (I mean posters or HQ still photos), and I

4919:

So sorry for being unexpectedly MIA this year! I'm now focusing on the final part, Acting style & screen persona, and left some comments in my sandbox, when you have time, please take a look :) After that, there's only the intro that needs an overhaul and then I think you'd be pretty much ready

4290:

I've started working on this, thanks for the suggestion. I wanted to let you know that I will be taking about a week and a half Wiki break starting today because of the Thanksgiving holiday so if you see I haven't been working on the article, it's not because I abandoned it, because I will be back!

4269:

As for Acting style, I'd like to see more academic sources here. For example, if you look at the Monroe biography, I used almost only academic sources when analysing Monroe's screen persona and significance to popular culture in that section, to give an idea of those discourses. So rather than just

4252:

Hopefully these are addressed now. Stewart tried to enlist in November 1940 and was rejected so he repealed. He continued to make films (Ziegfeld and Pot O') during the repeal process. He was done filming when he officially enlisted after the repeal in February 1941. He managed his affairs and left

4142:

Hi, yes please let's have another look at the military section! I've also noticed that many of the footnotes lead to websites that are dead or just unreliable, or are contemporary newspaper articles so they could be construed as original research, which is not good. If you check your books for what

3929:

Hi, would you mind taking one more look at the two sections in my sandbox? I could then move them to the actual article, as the content is pretty much all there, now it's gonna be mostly polishing the language and looking for better images for those two sections. You've done a marvelous job and the

4146:

As for the images, I'm no expert in them other than that one has to be careful not to break copyright laws. With Monroe, I learned that Internet Archive has a ton of film magazines from the 1910s-1960s, and that if a still or a publicity picture was published in such a magazine and the magazine is

4082:

I like the section titles that you added, I have no complaints really. As far as images go, I like what you've added and am curious where you found them. When I just looked up James Stewart on Commons, I didn't find anything good. I'm not sure where to find more good pictures of him. As far as his

1474:. It contains all the articles and books I could find about the temperance movement. Please note that they have mostly been selected on basis of notability, looking at the number of citations and sometimes the notability of the writer. Please do not share too widely, because they are copyrighted.-- 468:

Hi Skyes. Just a reminder, following the spirit of the disclosure requirement all the way through, any time you act in your paid capacity you should be sure to disclose that locally. It makes people feel weird if they happen to notice that you were paid or have a COI, so it is way better for you

404:

Skyes(BYU), you never did transclude this nomination, so it effectively has been missing in action for two months. If you would still like to pursue it, please finish this final step right away. If you don't plan to pursue it, please let us know here; if you do nothing, we will close it. Thank you

4432:

Hi Skyes(BYU)! I've proposed a WikiProject dedicated to a cappella. This would be a group of editors interested in improving the quality of articles related to a cappella. I noticed you've put great work into the BYU Vocal Point article. I know your interests may be more related to BYU than to a

4223:

I think I managed to fix up the military service section, all sources are more reliable now. I removed the portion about him being a major general as well. I'm happy to see that early life pictures were found. I'm planning to add an image or two once I figure out the copyright status. I've been

4109:

that were better than the original. I have considered fair use, but I'm concerned that the rationale won't be strong enough-I haven't had much luck with fair use besides using it for movie posters and book covers on their own pages. Unless I discuss the details of what is happening in the scene

4305:

Working on the legacy section, it's been challenging to find good sources, but it's a work in progress. I had someone ask if the article still needed a GA review. Were we planning on getting it through a GA review first? I'm okay either way. I just didn't know if you had a plan in mind for the

3893:

but it was immediately failed because I couldn't find a thorough peer reviewer and I was (and still am) unfamiliar with meticulous FA requirements including MOS and prose. I hoped that a GA review for this article would function as an initial peer review, but the response to my review has been

4274:

he is significant/remembered, currently the focus is on repeating what he did during his career and his ranking on polls. While I'm not saying you should delete that content, there needs to be more analytic material as well. Overall though, we're really close to nominating this article!

2541:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2647:

Very sorry about the delay. I took a break from Knowledge (XXG) for the holiday and didn't realize this nomination was still pending. I think your suggested rewrite of the hook is a great change (ALT0a). I would be happy to proceed with that one. Thank you for your patience.

4147:

out of copyright, then we can legally use those images (or better quality versions of them). I've started having a look, and although Stewart is featured in plenty, the problem is that it's difficult to find high quality copies of the photos we could use. It's a tricky one!

3681: 3446:

I'm so glad to see the article on one of my all-time favourite actors come this far. Thank you for improving it. Also, it would do me a great honour and privilege if I reviewed this article for you thoroughly. Do let me know if you would like me take it up, Sykes. Thanks.

1337: 1192: 1137: 1110: 3908:

I'd be happy to help you get this to at least GA, hopefully to FA! My schedule is a bit unpredictable, but I should definitely be able to commit to helping you with this article. In fact, I decided to start the review process in my sandbox, you can view it

3968:

You're too kind! I've now edited the military section (in the sandbox), let me know what you think. I'm afraid military history isn't my forte either, but let's hope we find a reviewer who has an idea! The only questions I have regarding that section are:

4035:"Later film career" (1957—1965); There seems to have been a turn in around 1957, after which Stewart remained popular but starred in a series of flops and films that just weren't as popular as his earlier '50s films. Important exceptions are of course 531:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4192:

I just noticed that I haven't found any reliable sources that say he was ever promoted to major general. Did you find anything either? Lead, infobox, and military service section would need to be fixed accordingly if it ends up being untrue.

4028:

Couple more questions: 1.) What do you think about the way I've divided the Career-section? Do you think there would be better ways to do it? I'm thinking that it could actually maybe be more logical to go with this structure for 1950s-1991:

1735:. I will try again though. So I am not certain I am the person you are looking for. Furthermore, I prefer to involve myself with articles with religious or social topics. Here are a few tips with regard to the FA nomination though: 4936:

No problem, thanks for helping out. I've finished making fixes and responding to your comments on the section. Aircorn expressed interest in the GA review and said they would take it on, but I don't think they have started it yet.

5393:

If you want help from those who tend to work on other Greek Letter Organizations (and some of who have contributed to this, Sigma Gamma Chi and Lambda Delta Sigma, you can leave a note on the talk page, or drop a note over on the

4050:"Television and semi-retirement" (1966-1991); I can't come up with a better title, but it seems Stewart since the late '60s he was no longer a top star (though of course still very famous) and also did not work as prolifically. 4177:

I'm on it. I'll be signing off of Knowledge (XXG) for the weekend soon, but I will keep on it next week. I'm hoping to replace most sources with biography, and if I can't find a bio source for it, it's probably going to go.

5353: 4392: 2569: 535:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1732: 1893: 1763:

I am uncertain whether the distinction between Themes, Motifs and Symbols is warranted. There is overlap, and from my studies of film semiotics, I can't remember such a distinction. I could have forgotten it,

927:

Furthermore, many editors only use the shortened footnote template for sources with multiple pages. For online sources without page numbering (and often no author specified), it is sometimes easier to use the

5337:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4376:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2553:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1889:

I can't remember why—I just remember that you need a US and international tag for images that have lapsed copyright. Could be wrong though. Copyright is not quite my forté, as I don't believe in it.

1063: 995: 3674: 3665: 3248: 3003: 202: 4162:

Also, in the military section (in addition to the questions above), could we find a better source for the Kirtland airbase than what appears to be a guidebook? Those are notoriously unreliable.

1745:

You might want to check whether the list in the subsection "Ties to Capone" should be integrated into prose. I think that per policy this is required. Search for the list integration policy.

5323: 4362: 184: 2720: 2614: 3914:

now (it seems like it's been going for a while?) or whether we should maybe withdraw and try again once we've done an initial reworking? I think the latter option would be the way to go.

1330: 1317: 1183: 1101: 1049: 1042: 876: 869: 33: 262: 154: 2292: 70: 4253:

promptly in March to serve. His radio programs were scheduled by Air Corps, I thought I had this in there but let me know if it's not clear. I added when he was sent to England.

4436: 839: 5395: 247: 179: 251: 4672: 3149: 3072: 1731:

Hello Skyes, how have you been? Good holiday? Thanks for your message. I must start by admitting that I never managed to get an article at FA yet. My last and only try is

4110:

displayed by the fair use image in the article, the rationale probably won't be strong enough. Is there a better location you use to search for images for your articles?

528: 4869: 3002:

I have reviewed this nomination and cautiously approved the hook, but I am left thinking there might be a dispute at a later stage about it. If you could take a look at

4055:

Please note here that I'm basing my observations only on the article though, so you might have better grasp of Stewart's career since you've actually done the research.

4032:"Career renewal in westerns and thrillers (1950-1956)"; this seems to have been the peak in Stewart's post-war career and most of his films during this time were hits. 1788:

You probably know this, but if this is your first FA nomination, you might have to find yourself a mentor. There is a page for that, linked on the FA nomination pages.

715: 570: 5252: 5165: 3234: 4224:

trying to clean up the acting style sections and beyond as well as switching the reliance some of the online sources to biography sources. Anything else I can do?

270: 174: 5258: 4982:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2386: 2234: 1946: 1520: 2960:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with

1945: 1519: 427:. The article isn't long enough, and there was a lot of drama over the other BYU professor we nominated that I think it would be best if we don't pursue it. 2854: 517: 159: 3597: 924:

book}}, {{cite news}} or other template. That said, it isn't required for GA to use such templates, as long as the sources used can be readily identified.

5277:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

5184:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

4888:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

4691:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3700:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3616:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3267:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3168:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2739:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2405:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2311:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1970: 1544: 1356:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1014:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

734:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

255: 1773:

Before nominating for FA, you might want to check whether there are any sources you have overlooked. This is generally a good thing to do. I usually use

149: 78: 2462: 266: 5041:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

4749:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

4490:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3823:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

2143:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1697:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1066:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

809:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

60: 1781:, the latter being the database of Harvard University. If there are any sources you cannot access the sources online or offline, try requesting on 319: 303: 189: 169: 4441:

If you could see yourself contributing to an a cappella-related article, consider joining! Also understand if you're simply not interested :)

43: 3749: 2850: 219:

is a project to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. Requests for image improvements can be added to the workshop pages:

5028: 4969: 4736: 4477: 3810: 2130: 1684: 1053: 796: 50: 5375: 4669:

was created by filming the release of hundreds of thousands of gallons of water into a large tank and playing the resulting film backwards?

4414: 3769: 2583: 5274: 5181: 4885: 4688: 3697: 3613: 3264: 3165: 2736: 2402: 2308: 1353: 1011: 731: 363: 164: 140: 4043:

and his collaborations with Ford and Koster. I feel like Stewart's career also didn't start slowing down until mid-'60s, so grouping

239: 330: 4665: 4433:

cappella, but I wanted to reach out just in case: If you like a cappella, please check out the proposal and share your feedback!

4591:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3525:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3416:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3361:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2068:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1642:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1160: 893:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

618:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

386: 5371: 4410: 2579: 2442: 5346: 4385: 2977: 2562: 4710: 3242: 2330: 2446:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 243: 5088: 3765: 76:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the

5158: 3591: 5222: 5127: 4835: 4631: 3653: 3565: 3205: 3105: 2680: 2451: 2354: 2262: 1305: 963: 687: 1168: 432: 394: 521: 5358: 4397: 4097:

From our university's archives I was able to find some photos of Stewart around teen-aged as well as a lobby card for

2897: 2574: 984: 975: 4537: 4014:

Thanks so much for all that you've done. I've already started addressing your comments and I will continue tomorrow.

117: 5278: 5264: 5185: 5171: 5042: 4889: 4875: 4750: 4692: 4678: 4491: 4067:

would also be great, and of course there's a need to have at least some images to illustrate Stewart's early life.

3824: 3701: 3687: 3617: 3603: 3307: 3268: 3254: 3226: 3217: 3169: 3155: 2840: 2766:

Made a separate category for them and moved the four (LDS, SCG, DFK and Yesharah) there. Still doing some tweeking.

2740: 2726: 2406: 2392: 2312: 2298: 2144: 1698: 1442: 1357: 1343: 1146: 1145:

is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in

1067: 1015: 1001: 810: 735: 721: 372: 371:

is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in

291: 281: 5013: 4954: 4796: 4721: 4563: 4462: 3795: 3497: 3388: 3333: 2497: 2115: 2040: 1669: 1614: 1038: 865: 781: 590: 4925: 4280: 4213: 4167: 4152: 4072: 4004: 3988: 3935: 3919: 3889:, I worked on the article with intentions of attempting an FA nomination. I have attempted one FA nomination for 3874: 2798: 2190: 1918: 1855: 1799: 1694: 1481: 1396: 1278: 1244: 1224: 1121: 1086: 939: 909: 1754:

I think you need to add international copyright tags to the images as well, e.g. tags that apply outside the US.

215: 4238:

Hello again, excellent work! I think with regards to the military section, these questions still need answers:

1758:

You do not always seem to mention the exact page in the citation. I am not sure whether that is allowed for FA.

762: 712:

wrote a book sympathetic to Mormon polygamists while simultaneously objecting to how polygamy subjugated women?

474: 5334: 4373: 2550: 1901: 3070:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

2612:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

2232:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

1190:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

1108:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

568:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

4856: 2705: 2692: 2605: 1471: 1164: 441: 428: 390: 5084: 4143:

they say? we may also be able to shorten the section if it looks like some of the information is excessive.

2844: 4450: 2633:

It has been two weeks since this post. Are you planning to respond, or do you want the nomination closed?

2239: 1197: 274: 1907:

tag to most images, unless there's a freedom of panorama problem or the image isn't free. Try consulting

65: 55: 5227: 5132: 4840: 4636: 4487: 3658: 3570: 3210: 3110: 2685: 2359: 2267: 2163: 2084: 1717: 1658: 1369: 1310: 1213:

There is a dead link from BYU-TV in the article about the temperance movement (just search the page for

968: 770: 692: 449: 410: 4446: 2969: 1962: 1536: 1434: 1426: 651: 644: 224: 5239:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5144:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4852:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4648:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3670:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3582:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3222:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3122:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2893: 2697:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2371:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2279:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1322:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 980:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 704:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4921: 4746: 4651: 4533: 4276: 4209: 4163: 4148: 4068: 4000: 3984: 3949: 3931: 3915: 3890: 3886: 3870: 3299: 2827:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2284: 2274: 2103: 1913: 1868: 1850: 1811: 1794: 1680: 1673: 1625: 1618: 1476: 1273: 1254: 1239: 1219: 1116: 1082: 1077: 934: 905: 900: 829: 634: 105: 5317: 4356: 4105:, I haven't been able to find any in the public domain and have not been able to find any images of 2537: 1966: 1540: 1493:

Thanks so much, I did add them to my Dropbox. I will certainly take a look at them when I come back.

929: 4769: 4607: 3303: 3181: 3011: 2988: 2836: 2418: 2018: 1837: 1592: 1217:). Could you trace that report/documentary for me? You can also send it to me Wiki-email. Thanks.-- 1027: 806: 747: 5330: 4792: 4369: 2546: 2493: 228: 220: 5038: 4983: 4704: 4510: 4241:

Did Stewart stop doing MGM films immediately after enlisting, or did he continue to film in 1941?

3972:

Did Stewart stop doing MGM films immediately after enlisting, or did he continue to film in 1941?

3843: 3820: 3713: 3629: 3377: 2794: 2324: 2186: 1392: 4582: 3516: 3407: 3352: 2059: 1633: 884: 846: 609: 5291: 5198: 5103: 5076: 4979: 4902: 4811: 4552: 3784: 3682:

Template:Did you know nominations/The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Australia

3432: 3322: 3280: 3238: 3081: 3067: 3040: 2912: 2870: 2813: 2790: 2752: 2638: 2623: 2609: 2512: 2229: 2205: 1411: 1187: 1142: 1105: 854: 663: 579: 565: 541: 368: 5342: 4381: 2558: 1908: 311: 5402: 5365: 5061: 5002: 4656: 4643: 4473: 4466: 4404: 3734: 3541: 3461: 3399: 3392: 3139: 3130: 3125: 3117: 3063: 2945: 2930: 2889: 2885: 2832: 2771: 2159: 2154: 2140: 2080: 2075: 1713: 1708: 1654: 1649: 1365: 766: 485: 469:

and everybody else if you explicitly disclose where ever you are interacting with people.

445: 422: 406: 5345:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5338: 4384:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4377: 2949: 2561:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2554: 1994: 1969:

because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion

1568: 1543:

because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion

5248: 4938: 4862: 4847: 4732: 4725: 4574: 4567: 4525: 4315: 4307: 4292: 4254: 4225: 4194: 4179: 4111: 4084: 4015: 3955: 3895: 3866: 3723: 3479: 3135: 3022: 2649: 2470: 2289:, it was removed from circulation and remained officially unavailable for nearly 50 years? 2099: 2008: 1872: 1815: 1582: 1494: 1450: 1338:

Template:Did you know nominations/The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

1258: 1234: 1138:

Template:Did you know nominations/The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

825: 820: 630: 625: 512: 496: 101: 4578: 3512: 3403: 3348: 2447: 2055: 1782: 1629: 1454: 880: 605: 39:

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

2847:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 5153: 4765: 4760: 4603: 4598: 3862: 3177: 3143: 3007: 2984: 2941: 2934: 2414: 2380: 2014: 1750:

Em-dashes can't be floating, they need to be connected to the words they're in between.

1588: 1153: 1023: 792: 785: 743: 708: 699: 655: 601: 594: 561: 379: 82:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type 5261:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 5168:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 4872:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 4675:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3684:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3600:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3251:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3152:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2723:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2389:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2295:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1340:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 998:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 718:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 5148: 5139: 5024: 5017: 4965: 4958: 4700: 4506: 4501: 3839: 3834: 3806: 3799: 3709: 3625: 3508: 3501: 3373: 3368: 3344: 3337: 3295: 2861:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2828: 2320: 2182: 2000: 1833: 1574: 341: 235: 3930:

article is beginning to look really fantastic! I'll move onto the next sections now.

3910: 3869:), and I'd be happy to give some feedback if you want! In any case, excellent work! 3076:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

2618:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

2238:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

1196:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

1114:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

574:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

238:

and the English Knowledge (XXG). For examples of work done by the Graphics Lab, see

5287: 5243: 5234: 5194: 5099: 5095: 5048: 5033: 4989: 4898: 4807: 4803: 4784: 4756: 4741: 4594: 4548: 4544: 4497: 4482: 4101:

which would satisfy the need for images of Mann's westerns. As far as an image for

3830: 3815: 3780: 3776: 3528: 3428: 3423: 3419: 3364: 3318: 3314: 3276: 3077: 3036: 2908: 2904: 2866: 2862: 2809: 2805: 2748: 2634: 2619: 2508: 2504: 2485: 2201: 2197: 2150: 2135: 2098:

that Barry Kolman made which could be a good addition to the multimedia section. --

2071: 1704: 1689: 1645: 1407: 1403: 1149:. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with 1073: 1058: 896: 850: 816: 801: 659: 621: 575: 537: 375:. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with 90:

on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

5309: 5268: 5175: 4879: 4682: 4348: 3691: 3607: 3258: 3159: 2730: 2528: 2396: 2302: 1983: 1557: 1347: 1005: 845:

Please see note on your DYK review. You may want to familiarize yourself with the

725: 3861:

have some experience of reviewing and have brought two articles up to FA status (

5398: 5214: 5119: 5057: 5052: 4998: 4993: 4827: 4623: 3730: 3645: 3557: 3537: 3532: 3473: 3456: 3197: 3097: 2786: 2767: 2672: 2375: 2366: 2346: 2254: 2225: 2178: 2126: 2119: 2051: 2044: 1384: 1297: 989: 955: 679: 481: 5080: 3753: 3058: 2600: 2466: 2220: 2095: 1446: 1388: 1178: 1131: 1096: 556: 357: 97:(~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. 3586: 3577: 2714: 2710: 4573:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

3507:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

3398:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

3343:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

2050:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1973:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please 1803: 1624:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1547:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please 875:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

600:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

3757: 5406: 5379: 5349:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5295: 5202: 5107: 5065: 5006: 4974: 4946: 4929: 4906: 4815: 4773: 4714: 4611: 4556: 4514: 4454: 4418: 4388:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4323: 4300: 4284: 4262: 4233: 4217: 4202: 4187: 4171: 4156: 4119: 4092: 4076: 4023: 4008: 3992: 3963: 3939: 3923: 3903: 3878: 3847: 3788: 3738: 3717: 3633: 3545: 3487: 3463: 3436: 3381: 3326: 3284: 3185: 3085: 3044: 3030: 3015: 2992: 2916: 2874: 2817: 2775: 2756: 2657: 2642: 2627: 2587: 2565:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2516: 2474: 2422: 2334: 2242: 2209: 2167: 2107: 2088: 2022: 1922: 1880: 1859: 1823: 1721: 1662: 1596: 1502: 1485: 1415: 1373: 1282: 1266: 1248: 1228: 1200: 1172: 1125: 1090: 1031: 943: 913: 858: 833: 774: 751: 667: 638: 583: 545: 489: 453: 436: 414: 398: 109: 5327:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4366:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3761: 1325: 5255:

for being associated with a religious group practicing wife sacrifice?

4587: 3521: 3412: 3357: 2064: 1638: 889: 614: 3729:

Hello. Help copy edit, improvements and added citations. Thanks you.

1769:

Shouldn't the Remake subsection be part of the section Related films?

3639:

DYK for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Australia

992:, she passed an ordinance prohibiting the use of slingshots in town? 269:

you are skilled at, and lend a hand. You can also add your entry to

3006:, I think you may wish to comment or suggest a different wording. 2489: 1739:

First of all, the article is well-written and looks very complete.

473:

would have been good to explicitly say it in your DKY nomination,

94: 3678:

began when a 17-year-old missionary arrived from England in 1840?

3590:

was promoted to senior vice president of creative development at

2428:

Orphaned non-free image File:The world is yours scarface 1932.jpg

5362:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5075:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

4783:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

4524:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

4428:

Request for Comment: WikiProject for A Cappella-related articles

4401:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3748:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3294:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2884:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2785:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2700: 2484:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2177:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1989: 1563: 1383:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1291:

DYK for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

115: 5352:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

4391:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2568:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

234:

The Graphics Lab helps improve all graphical content stored on

5321:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

4788: 1774: 1778: 1461:

at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

1064:

Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

996:

Template:Did you know nominations/Mary E. Woolley Chamberlain

480:

Does that make sense? Happy to discuss if not. Best regards

93:

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four

4047:

etc. with the minor films he did in the late '60s seems odd.

3692:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Australia

3675:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Australia

3666:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Australia

3249:

Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Cheney (folklorist)

3021:

I agree with you, I think withdrawn is a better word option.

2431: 1425: 121: 4529: 1470:

If you are able to use Dropbox, you might want to download

1466:

Collection of articles and books on the temperance movement

1433:

Hello, Skyes(BYU). Your question has been answered at the

516:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

336:

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use

4437:

Here's a link to the proposal for WikiProject A Cappella.

2721:

Template:Did you know nominations/John Steele (physician)

4360:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1348:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

1318:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

1184:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

1102:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

1050:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

1043:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

877:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

870:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Japan

5396:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities

5333:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5079:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4787:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4528:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4372:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3752:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 3298:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2888:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2831:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2789:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2549:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2488:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2181:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1974: 1548: 1458: 1387:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 510:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2293:

Template:Did you know nominations/Scarface (1932 film)

2998:

Did you know nomination of Thomas Cheney (folklorist)

2281:... that after the original 1932 release of the film 1997:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing 1571:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing 529:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Denise Stephens

5257: