User Talk:Shaan Sengupta

767:. I believe this is also just other attempt by making me suspect of using different account. That account was made even before SPI report was filed against me. I can also give you some similarities. All the previous socks had a deep connection with Bengal and Leftist Communist parties. This sock is also the same. If you see their contributions history it shows they edit West Bengal related articles the most. They even edit local body elections of West Bengal just like the previous socks did. Also I see that you are involved in a discussion with them at their talk page. Do you really believe that I will do something that I was fighting against before I got blocked. I repeatedly argued against adding minor political parties with the socks of Srimonbanik2007. And in that discussion they have accepted that they are from West Bengal. Just looking at their talk page and contributions will clear a lot of things. This SPI might help you. 536:

community's trust. However, considering your desire to continue constructive editing, I have a suggestion for you: refrain from creating any new accounts in the future. Stop editing from this account today and preserve it for the future. After six months, submit a request for a standard offer. If it gets rejected, wait another six months before making another standard offer request. Continue this approach, as it is the last possible way for you to continue on Knowledge. I cannot guarantee that you will be accepted, but I believe that admins/checkusers may consider your offer, given your willingness to volunteer and commitment to not breaking the rules again. This is my last reply here. Happy not-editing. –

1225:

blocking checkuser @]. I would like to begin with accepting that I have made mistakes in the past. In my initial days I have been disruptive and my contributions were not always according to the guidelines. But with this account I tried my best to contribute in a generous way and I believe I did that. The only mistake I made was that I did Block evasion. I regret that. I would apologise for that and request the community to give me a chance. For these 6 months I wasn't just sitting and waiting for this time to pass. I made contributions to other projects. Initially to Hindi and Bhojpuri Knowledge. Mostly on Wikimedia Commons and some on Wikidata. <u: -->

1193:

1161:

1085:. I would like to begin with accepting that I have made mistakes in the past. In my initial days I have been disruptive and my contributions were not always according to the guidelines. But with this account I tried my best to contribute in a generous way and I believe I did that. The only mistake I made was that I did Block evasion. I regret that. I would apologise for that and request the community to give me a chance. For these 6 months I wasn't just sitting and waiting for this time to pass. I made contributions to other projects. Initially to Hindi and Bhojpuri Knowledge. Mostly on Wikimedia Commons and some on Wikidata. 1493:

a view in an MfD isn't POV pushing. Its just mentioning what one sees it as. Anyway I would want to stop here. And once again reiterate that even if I still have some shortcomings please let me know. I am fully destined to work on them. Handing me a topic block of this wide range (ARBIPA) would make me nearly worthless here bcoz most of my edits are in this area only. And I am sure that after 6600-odd edits my track record here will be my voice. Now, The community knows both our views. Let the admins/CUs decide. Thank you.

317:

created, I lost its password and created a new one and was blocked because of sockpuppetry and disruptive edits. This account stats must be satisfying to show that I no longer am disruptive. I have dealt with nearly all the issue that I had with the experience that I now carry. As you have seen that I have no sleepers, is there a way to get out of this early? Or will I be allowed to use this account after six months because I no longer have access to the previous ones.

771:. If this satisfies you, you might report him to correct place and remove the report from my investigation page. Or you can keep it at both places if you still suspect. I would once again request you to request a CU and report Aparupa to Srimonbanik2007. You can also ping involved CUs/Admins/clerks in the new report. And once again guys, I am not making any new accounts. And I believe I will now directly log in when 6 months from today pass. 131: 947: 1000: 189: 1363: 443:

fresh start. I had access to JaggaDaaku till few months back (means after making this account). But I lost my mobile phone which had everything. And as mentioned above I am not very good at remembering passwords so right now I only have access to this account. If I gain access to my lost mobile then I may have access to JaggaDaaku which is very unlikely.

914: 1227:

access to my lost phone which still is unlikely. Better word would be nearly impossible. And I also told that sadly I am not good at remembering passwords. And I preserved this bcoz I used this account on Commons. So there is no way I can make an unblock request with any other (original) account.</u: -->

1195:

1163:

1483:

two of the links you mentioned are for the same topic of Father of the Nation. Regarding me closing the discussion it was done after an advice from an uninvolved user to continue it at the article's talk page. And that's the only thing I mentioned there. The reason to close was so that the discussion

887:

and with this account they claimed to be me. I hope this clears any doubt. If you guys still have something you can run a CU check. Also to inform it has been run multiple times on me to check sleepers but none were found. I can guarantee that I am not returning with another account and will wait for

519:

I accept that I have made mistakes. But I was left with no choice. I waited after JD was blocked. I filed request for standard offer. But it was not accepted bcoz I didn't have access to my original account. That's why I made this one. I am once again willing to wait for 6 months, but its just that I

289:

with zero edits, then apply for an unblock with the oldest account you still have access to. At that point, you'll need to convince us you understand your use of this account was blatantly inappropriate and deal with the issues that lead to your original block and subsequent unrelenting sockpuppetry.

1943:

If something more needs my explanation I am happy to give. And I will once again say, that I am ready to make any required changes that should be. I know that I have some shortcomings like everyone has and I am ready to address it. I have been away for 6 months. I would request the community to give

1920:

Regarding the Akhand Bharat template, it is a belief that the country of our ancestors which is now divided into many parts should come back as one again. And by no means I support any violence or achieving it by force. I am proud that my country has given the message of peace to this world time and

1492:

regarding that honor. Like Sheikh Mujib & MK Gandhi shouldn't be kept under same criteria. One has got the title officially by his country, other is just called respectfully by his followers and many of the countrymen. Regarding the MFD of my template, I just put forward my view. Putting forward

694:

page where a user is vandalising it consistently. I even warned them on their talk page but they won't listen. Elections happen in India after 5 years so 2029 is the next after 2024 but they are repeatedly mentioning 2028. The user goes by Manaal or something. If you can fix please. I am making this

403:

Yes, I confirm I no longer have any access to those accounts. I only had the detail of my last account in my previous mobile which I no longer have. Also I am not so good at remembering passwords. When I make the request with the standard offer after 6 months I will be making with this account only.

1883:

Banned users seeking a return are advised to make significant and useful contributions to other WMF projects prior to requesting a return to the English Knowledge per this offer. Many unban requests have been declined due to the banned user simply waiting six months without making any contributions

1610:

I was corrected by an experienced user and after that I gladly accepted my mistake and we moved on. And I can't see a reason that failure to recognise reliability of a source would amount to topic ban. I can't understand the connection between. Regarding block evasion, I have accepted my mistake on

1226:

Also the reason for filling this unblock request from this account and not from my original account is bcoz I only have access to this account. My last account JaggaDaaku which I used on other wikis, I lost access to it after my phone was lost. The only way I could get access to it is if I ever get

1224:

Hello everyone, I am placing this Unblock request after I was blocked for sockpuppetry in Jan 2024. I made some talk page edits after that which reset my timer. The last edit I made was on 17th Feb 2024 and now is 18th Aug 2024. So I am making this request as a WP:SO for which I was directed by the

1194:

1192:

1162:

1160:

1087:

1080:

760:

is my account. The reason you gave is of same name, editing similar pages and maybe some more. I would request you to make it a CU request if you suspect it being me for a technical check. Bcoz I am here to tell you its not me and also giving you much better proof as to who that might be. Note that

1916:

To me RSS is a social organisation which carries out social works and strives to protect the Indian heritage and the Indian culture. This organisation has time and again helped the nation, most recently in the Wayanad disaster. If Knowledge identifies the organisation as a Neo-Nazi, then I am left

689:

Don't worry. You can run checks every day/week if you want. I am not making another account. I am just hoping that when I apply for standard offer after 6 months it is accepted and I am pardoned for my mistakes so that I can continue the good work that I have done until now. Since I am blocked and

481:

I didn't use this account on other wikis as JaggaDaaku was established there. And had I used two accounts on same pages it would have been a clear violation for fresh start. Also it would have given the impression that single user is using two accounts to support himself which was again wrong. But

1277:

Thank you for the reply. I mentioned this at the time of blocking also that I only have access to this account. My last account JaggaDaaku which I used on other wikis, I lost access to it after my phone was lost. The only way I could get access to it is if I ever get access to my lost phone which

535:

As you mentioned, "I filed a request for a standard offer, but it was not accepted because I didn't have access to my original account. That's why I created this one." I want to advise that creating a new account despite the denial was not the right step; as a result, you have completely lost the

520:

want to continue using this account, and for that I can accept all the ways that are acceptable to the community. You can lock all those previous accounts globally too if you think I might use them on other projects. Just accept my plea so that I can use the standard offer with this account only.

1088:

835:

since I am blocked, I believe I can't inform them. But I gave the SPI link of Srimonbanik2007 above. You can take a help from it and as far as the case filed by you is concerned you can mention there that you believe that Aparupa is not my sock but that of Srimonbanik. This will save admins time

735:

It's sad that your account has been blocked. Many times these stupid Knowledge admins also suspected me for sockpuppetry without any valid reasons. They blocked many innocent Knowledge users without any valid reasons. I think this is too much giving fake allegations and blocking accounts of hard

442:

no. My last blocked account JaggaDaaku. I had access only to that after it was blocked. I filed UTRS from it after waiting for 6 months. There I was asked to request from my original account, whose access I didn't had. That's why after that request got turned down I made new (this) account for a

316:

I did the same the last time. I went with 0 edits no new accounts. But I was told to make a request with the original account. I no longer have access to any of my previous accounts. I only can preserve this account. My original account was banned for sockpuppetry only. The first account that I

836:

also. Also I would request that since you too think the same as me, you should file SPI of Aparupa as sock of Marxist/Happyjit and Srimonbanik as Sock Master. Thanks. I hope you can take care of the rest. Also you can mention link to this discussion at those SPIs. 13:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

790:

After noticing him from many days I have already found that he was not you because he was editing like that Marxist named user. But it was late as after filing a report it cannot taken back, so if that user is not you then don't worry admins will remove it. I'm Sorry for it.

1278:

still is unlikely. Better word would be nearly impossible. And I also told that sadly I am not good at remembering passwords. And I preserved this bcoz I used this account on Commons. So there is no way I can make an unblock request with any other (original) account. Thanks.

1426:. I won't say I haven't made mistakes, but definitely I have made corrections whenever I have been guided. And I am going to continue to do so. I remember our interests were conflicting in some areas and I would strongly like to believe that this isn't bcoz of that. 373:

Ok I will once again wait for 6 months. Just tell me one last thing, If I make the appeal after 6 months with this account, will it be considered or I will be asked to make request with original account. I have cleared that I no longer have access to any of those.

1521:

edit to that page and Ratnahastin lists Shaan Sengupta's edit to that page as an example of Shaan Sengupta being disruptive. Note that Ratnahastin made a "delete" post on that page; but having a different opinion is not in itself disruptive.) With respect of

971:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1508:

I had a lot of experience of dealing with Shaan Sengupta and my impression was that he was a good editor, who behaved well. Yes, he made mistakes, and misunderstood things, but new editors do that. I do not understand how any reasonable person can say that

261:

the notice reads that multiple accounts is allowed but not for illegitimate reasons. I told you everything that was true still this is illegitimate? You said I am not eligible for a clean start. What do I need to do so that I can do editing on Knowledge.

458:

You created this account in May 2023, but you edited as Jagga Daaku on other wikis until 15 August 2023. If you have good intentions, why did you edit from both accounts, and why didn't you disclose earlier that Jagga Daaku is your account? –

967: 974:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

1932:. We sorted it out. Then after I was blocked the user restored it going against that discussion. And Taj is a mixture of Indo-Islamic architecture with Arabic influence. Here we are talking about Indian ancestry. Not a mix of Indo-Arab. 1846:, I think they might be following the rules but still they are causing harm to various pages here, one user has given an example above. The user was still using his account on Knowledge Commons and various other Knowledge. 1888:

It's simple: Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion; i.e. having made no edits, using a named account or an IP address, on the English Knowledge. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the

813:

Can you please ping the administrators who previously handled this issue, as they may be able to help. If the socks are impersonating as you reported them, then they may also impersonate others who will do same.

419:

You mentioned that you didn't have access to your old accounts, which is why you created this account after waiting for six months and never logged into other accounts after the creation of this one, correct? –

1771:

by saying that the victims were "primarily" Bengali Hindus, something that sources don't support. (Sources support "especially" but not "primarily".) Hindu nationalists like to call this a "Hindu genocide":

1938:

Regarding the RfC of Bangladeshi genocide, I agree that the word especially would have been a better choice than primarily. And I am glad that you accepted that I didn't outrightly supported what was wrong.

920:

I am sorry that you are blocked. I hope that you get unblocked some time; but you will need to be able to accept or tolerate delays, problems, or suffering without becoming annoyed or anxious. Best of luck.

1935:

I have already explained the Gandhi thing above. There is nothing like pushing a POV. It was just a fact that I thought should be mentioned. But I left it after I wasnt able to convince the community.

1693: 1514: 1959:

If you consider RSS as a social organisation. It shows how brainwashed insane you are. You must've no right to edit in neutral media like Knowledge. RSS is responsible for the assassination of

1750: 1523: 1611:

that too and this WP:SO unblock request is in accordance with the rules and guidelines only. Again, I would repeat that the community knows both our views. Let them decide. Thank you.

1228:

I promise that I won't let the community down for trusting me and am fully prepared to fix if any (I am sure may be) issues still need to be addressed. Thank you. ''']<sup: -->

1196:

I promise that I won't let the community down for trusting me and am fully prepared to fix if any (I am sure may be) issues still need to be addressed. Thank you. ''']<sup: -->

1164:

I promise that I won't let the community down for trusting me and am fully prepared to fix if any (I am sure may be) issues still need to be addressed. Thank you. ''']<sup: -->

872: 768: 497:

Sockpuppetry is a global policy that applies to all other Wikimedia projects. So, no matter if you were using two accounts on different wikis, it was still sockpuppetry. –

1818:

Nazism was also mainstream in Germany for more than a decade. Were we supposed to tolerate it? A bigger problem with Shaan Sengupta is that his edits reflect his POV.

952: 937: 1586:

to be unreliable and he should be unblocked without a topic ban? I don't find any sense there. You are forgetting that he evaded his block for 3 years through socks.

1090:

I promise that I won't let the community down for trusting me and am fully prepared to fix if any (I am sure may be) issues still need to be addressed. Thank you.

482:

after I lost access to JD I had no option but to use only this account on other wikis too. Since I was no longer using JD, I thought its ok to not announce that.

754:

I have decided to wait for 6 months and take WP:SO and I know that this will reset the timer. But this is necessary. I see that you have filed a SPI saying that

1297:

Sorry for this ping. I know you have workload and you might be occupied somewhere else. But if you could please act on my unblock request. It would be nice.

1754: 1422:

I would request you to kindly provide some examples of what you are saying. I mostly (maybe only) edit articles related to India. And I am yet to be called

1036: 555: 38: 73: 1758: 1669:? I don't think the Knowledge community would be quite as lenient on someone who openly declared himself as, say, a white nationalist on his user page. 1658: 956: 1326:

So will it be decided by someone else? Will I have to wait in line with other requests? Just asking bcoz I am not aware of the process. I pinged @

1775: 1724: 79: 1704: 1031: 1928:

of the editor involved. We agreed on a common point, and it was modified accordingly. Then he once again removed it. I once again went to

1924:

Regarding Template:User Indian it was just reverted twice from both ends. Then to follow the general rule, I started a discussion at the

1646:

Shaan Sengupta has on several occasions edited with a Hindu nationalist POV. I question if he is able to edit with a neutral POV in the

1130: 230: 1677: 1964: 1778: 1764: 1726: 152: 147: 101: 97: 1756: 285:

you'll ever be unblocked. If you don't have access to your original account and can't recover the password, you need to go at least

1728: 1662: 1114: 1456: 1723:. This reflects a Hindu nationalist belief that the Taj Mahal isn't sufficiently Indian, as it was built during Muslim rule: 24: 1448: 1991: 68: 1680: 1929: 1925: 1716: 1182: 1050: 691: 1145:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "

1654: 226: 59: 1877:

regarding your comment that I was still using my account on Commons and others. It is as per the advice available at

1773: 92: 1258:

No CU evidence of block evasion. However, you should be making your unblock request with your original account. --

1007: 960: 222: 197: 164: 110: 1394:

This account was certainly disruptive on Indian topics. I would prefer no unblock without a topic ban from the

1138: 1742: 1734: 634: 594: 580: 563: 1484:

could continue on the talk page and no one else comments there. And my only point was to differentiate the

1968: 212: 208: 204: 1827: 1595: 1468: 1407: 619: 544: 505: 467: 428: 351:

closer to a community ban than you are to being unblocked. Six months with zero edits is, frankly, the

607:

I agree that the username and edit summary match with this user, but we should assume good faith, as @

1746: 1712: 1133:

to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

1946: 1892: 1790: 1768: 1623: 1495: 1428: 1369: 1332: 1299: 1280: 1245: 1119: 1092: 1014: 890: 838: 810: 787: 773: 697: 522: 484: 445: 406: 376: 319: 264: 49: 20: 1799:

BJP-type views are mainstream in present-day India. If we want Knowledge articles on India to be

1123: 678: 630: 604: 590: 576: 559: 170: 115: 64: 1698:

can't understand what is divisive when all it talks about is uniting the divided parts into one

1666: 741: 45: 1839: 1820: 1809: 1647: 1607: 1588: 1534: 1480: 1461: 1451:

which you had to close yourself despite you were not allowed to do that. Your disruption at

1419: 1400: 1395: 1181:

with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a

926: 682: 612: 537: 516: 498: 478: 460: 439: 421: 166: 130: 112: 1683: 1581: 1455:

was not small. Nevertheless, you did not learn and kept repeating the same POV pushing at

1350: 1317: 1263: 832: 815: 792: 751: 720: 394: 360: 340: 303: 278: 247: 1112:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please

1777:. That being said, I'll give him credit for not outright supporting "Bengali Hindus" in 389:

You need to clearly indicate you no longer have access to any other account, and why. --

1960: 1910: 1800: 1786: 1738: 982: 686: 608: 573: 344: 295: 1330:

bcoz I had seen in cases, admins asking for blocking admin/CU involvement. Thank you.

1985: 1863: 1673: 1122:

by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these

820: 797: 913: 225:. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 1878: 737: 712: 207:

that was created to violate Knowledge policy. Note that using multiple accounts is

1621:. I am glad that I continue to get your guidance. Thank you so much. Means a lot. 1528:

Please could admins unblock Shaan Sengupta. I do not see a case for a topic ban.

1345:

Please don't ping me again. Yes, it will be reviewed by another admin in time. --

1177:

the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting

1843: 1806: 1618: 1569: 1531: 968:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Next Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election

923: 877: 756: 695:

single request only bcoz I came to write about SPI. See you all after 6 months.

1452: 168: 114: 1972: 1954: 1900: 1868: 1833: 1813: 1794: 1688: 1631: 1601: 1538: 1503: 1474: 1436: 1413: 1377: 1354: 1346: 1340: 1327: 1321: 1313: 1307: 1294: 1288: 1274: 1267: 1259: 1253: 1100: 1082: 986: 930: 898: 881:

is not the first try to impersonate me. They have done it previously too with

846: 827: 804: 781: 745: 724: 716: 705: 638: 624: 598: 584: 567: 549: 530: 510: 492: 472: 453: 433: 414: 398: 390: 384: 370: 364: 356: 327: 313: 307: 299: 272: 258: 251: 243: 1568:

Do you really believe that an editor who believes that reliable sources like

1803:, we need to tolerate pro-BJP editors (and insist that they obey the rules). 1708: 1692:) in another self-made userbox on his user page and supported keeping it at 1575: 1213:

the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting

978: 883: 868: 763: 1842:, Shaan Sengupta's edits are however one sided. Regarding the comment of @ 871:, just to clear the air over similar name of the blocked sock in SPI case 1874: 611:

sleeper-checked Shaan Sengupta again on January 27 and found nothing. –

1944:

me a chance so that I can contribute in a constructive way. Thank you.

715:

until 2024-07-28. Each time you edit this page, you reset the timer. --

188: 1963:. It was banded from India multiple times as terrorist organisation. 1855: 589:

also the pages that they're editing. overall pattern. (limited)

1921:

again. And this concept in my view follows the same principle.

1547:

that pro-Hindutva userbox and then defended it was disruptive.

183: 171: 124: 116: 15: 1657:, the leading far-right Hindu nationalist organization, with 1515:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Akhand Bharat

690:

writing this I would request if it's right to keep an eye on

998: 1526:: yes, Shaan Sengupta blundered; but it was not malicious. 1459:. I haven't even talked about your other accounts yet. 1584: 1579: 1573: 1544: 1510: 1064: 1060: 1054: 1045: 1041: 1027: 1023: 1019: 951:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

221:, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban 1838:

I think this should be discussed first, I agree with @

955:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

277:

This is an illegitimate example, a clear example of

1686:with other irredentist beliefs like Nazi Germany's 873:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Srimonbanik2007

769:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Srimonbanik2007

761:previously a account was made to impersonate me as 1886:And the first two points of the Standard Offer is 1447:You were criticized for your pro-Hindutva editing 888:another 6 months for WP:SO from today. Thank you. 404:All the rest accounts can be permanently locked. 1753:, Hindu nationalists aren't big fans of Gandhi: 1126:instead for quick attention by an administrator. 953:Next Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election 938:Next Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election 27:, where you can send him messages and comments. 8: 1118:. If no block is listed, then you have been 1653:He openly identified as a supporter of the 1185:, explaining why the request was declined. 335:you made with this account was disruptive. 1767:a Hindu nationalist interpretation of the 1517:was disruptive. (It was Shaan Sengupta's 1913:. I will address everything one by one. 1909:Thank you for bringing all of this out @ 1149:" with the name of the blocking admin: 572:Mentioned it because the edit summary. 1887: 1882: 1720: 1697: 1359:Thank you and sorry. (Not pinging you 281:. Your abuse of this account makes it 1665:. Surely this violates the spirit of 7: 1360: 339:you made with this account violated 1917:with nothing to say on this matter. 1721:Indo-Islamic is not Indian ancestry 957:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 298:than you are to being unblocked. -- 14: 965:The article will be discussed at 355:given your chronic violations. -- 235:{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} 1361: 945: 912: 187: 129: 39:Click here to start a new topic. 1230:''' 12:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1198:''' 12:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1166:''' 12:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1115:check the list of active blocks 1: 1973:03:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 1202:{{subst:Decline reason here}} 1179:{{subst:Decline reason here}} 1006:This user is asking that his 931:18:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC) 918:Do not reply to this message. 899:01:43, 17 February 2024 (UTC) 847:13:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC) 828:13:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC) 805:13:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC) 782:03:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC) 746:11:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC) 711:You are now not eligible for 36:Put new text under old text. 1801:neutral point of view (NPOV) 725:20:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 706:19:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 692:2024 Indian general election 639:13:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 625:13:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 599:13:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 585:12:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 568:12:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 550:10:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 531:09:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 511:09:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 493:08:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 473:08:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 454:08:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 434:06:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 415:18:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 399:18:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 385:18:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 365:18:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 328:17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 308:17:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 273:17:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 252:17:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 1955:12:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 1901:14:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 1869:14:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 1834:11:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 1814:10:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 1795:08:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 1655:Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh 1632:16:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1602:15:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1539:15:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1524:Ratnahastin's other example 1504:15:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1475:14:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1437:14:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1414:13:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1378:15:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1355:14:40, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1341:14:21, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1322:14:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1308:14:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1289:12:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1268:12:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1254:12:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1101:12:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 44:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2008: 1745:an image of Gandhi in the 1312:I will not be doing so. -- 223:may be reverted or deleted 1131:guide to appealing blocks 731:Leftish wikipedia admins. 558:is not the blocked user. 231:guide to appealing blocks 74:Be welcoming to newcomers 1749:article. As pointed out 987:13:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) 959:or whether it should be 233:, then adding the text 1819: 1741:with "unofficial" and 1705:repeatedly edit-warred 1659:a self-created userbox 1587: 1460: 1399: 1222:{{unblock reviewed |1= 1190:{{unblock reviewed |1= 1156:blocking administrator 1147:blocking administrator 1003: 736:working contributors. 196:This account has been 69:avoid personal attacks 1217:with your rationale: 1154:{{Unblock on hold |1= 1051:change block settings 1002: 992:Unblock request WP:SO 878:Aparupa Sengupta 1991 757:Aparupa Sengupta 1991 229:by first reading the 211:, but using them for 1992:Requests for unblock 1747:Father of the Nation 1713:Template:User Indian 1453:Father of the nation 1081:blocking checkuser @ 1769:Bangladesh genocide 1884:to other projects. 1234:accept reason here 1215:Accept reason here 1004: 884:Shaan Sengupta 2.0 764:Shaan Sengupta 2.0 290:I'll note you are 80:dispute resolution 41: 1696:, saying that he 1543:The fact that he 347:. Again, you are 337:Every single edit 333:Every single edit 241: 240: 227:appeal this block 177: 176: 158: 157: 123: 122: 60:Assume good faith 37: 1999: 1951: 1950: 1897: 1896: 1860: 1851: 1832: 1823: 1812: 1628: 1627: 1600: 1591: 1537: 1500: 1499: 1473: 1464: 1433: 1432: 1412: 1403: 1374: 1373: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1337: 1336: 1304: 1303: 1285: 1284: 1250: 1249: 1237: 1216: 1205: 1180: 1169: 1148: 1129:Please read our 1097: 1096: 1070: 1068: 1057: 1039: 1037:deleted contribs 1001: 949: 948: 929: 916: 895: 894: 886: 880: 843: 842: 825: 824: 818: 802: 801: 795: 778: 777: 766: 759: 702: 701: 527: 526: 489: 488: 450: 449: 411: 410: 381: 380: 353:absolute minimum 324: 323: 269: 268: 236: 191: 184: 172: 144: 143: 133: 125: 117: 16: 2007: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1982: 1981: 1948: 1947: 1894: 1893: 1867: 1859: 1852: 1847: 1821: 1804: 1625: 1624: 1589: 1582:The News Minute 1529: 1497: 1496: 1462: 1430: 1429: 1401: 1371: 1370: 1362: 1334: 1333: 1301: 1300: 1282: 1281: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1221: 1214: 1189: 1178: 1153: 1146: 1142: 1103: 1094: 1093: 1058: 1048: 1034: 1017: 999: 994: 976: 950: 946: 942: 921: 892: 891: 882: 876: 840: 839: 822: 821: 816: 799: 798: 793: 775: 774: 762: 755: 733: 699: 698: 524: 523: 486: 485: 447: 446: 408: 407: 378: 377: 321: 320: 283:far less likely 266: 265: 234: 182: 173: 167: 138: 119: 118: 113: 86: 85: 55: 12: 11: 5: 2005: 2003: 1995: 1994: 1984: 1983: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1961:Mahatma Gandhi 1941: 1940: 1939: 1936: 1933: 1926:user talk page 1922: 1918: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1861: 1853: 1836: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1761: 1739:Mahatma Gandhi 1731: 1707:to remove the 1701: 1670: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1615: 1614: 1612: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1527: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1239: 1238: 1229:]</sup: --> 1207: 1206: 1197:]</sup: --> 1183:default reason 1171: 1170: 1165:]</sup: --> 1143: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1127: 1079: 1075:Request reason 1072: 1015:Shaan Sengupta 997: 993: 990: 944: 943: 941: 936:Nomination of 934: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 811:Shaan Sengupta 788:Shaan Sengupta 732: 729: 728: 727: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 456: 239: 238: 192: 181: 178: 175: 174: 169: 165: 163: 160: 159: 156: 155: 150: 140: 139: 134: 128: 121: 120: 111: 109: 108: 105: 104: 88: 87: 84: 83: 76: 71: 62: 56: 54: 53: 42: 33: 32: 29: 28: 21:Shaan Sengupta 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2004: 1993: 1990: 1989: 1987: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1949:ShaanSengupta 1942: 1937: 1934: 1931: 1930:his talk page 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1912: 1908: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1895:ShaanSengupta 1890: 1885: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1865: 1857: 1850: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1835: 1831: 1829: 1824: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1808: 1802: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1785: 1780: 1776: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1755: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1729: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1711:picture from 1710: 1706: 1702: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1685: 1682: 1679: 1676:(comparisons 1675: 1674:Akhand Bharat 1672:He supported 1671: 1668: 1664: 1663:his user page 1660: 1656: 1652: 1651: 1649: 1645: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1626:ShaanSengupta 1620: 1617:Also thanks @ 1616: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1597: 1592: 1585: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1536: 1533: 1525: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1498:ShaanSengupta 1491: 1487: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1470: 1465: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1431:ShaanSengupta 1425: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1409: 1404: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1372:ShaanSengupta 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1335:ShaanSengupta 1329: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1302:ShaanSengupta 1296: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1286: 1283:ShaanSengupta 1276: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1251: 1248:ShaanSengupta 1235: 1231: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1212: 1203: 1199: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1184: 1176: 1167: 1157: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1140: 1139:Administrator 1132: 1128: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1107: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1095:ShaanSengupta 1089: 1084: 1078: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1062: 1056: 1052: 1047: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1029: 1028:global blocks 1025: 1024:active blocks 1021: 1016: 1011: 1009: 996: 991: 989: 988: 984: 980: 973: 970: 969: 962: 958: 954: 939: 935: 933: 932: 928: 925: 919: 915: 900: 897: 896: 893:ShaanSengupta 885: 879: 874: 870: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 848: 845: 844: 841:ShaanSengupta 834: 831: 830: 829: 826: 819: 812: 808: 807: 806: 803: 796: 789: 785: 784: 783: 780: 779: 776:ShaanSengupta 770: 765: 758: 753: 750: 749: 748: 747: 743: 739: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 709: 708: 707: 704: 703: 700:ShaanSengupta 693: 688: 684: 680: 679:Thewikizoomer 640: 636: 632: 631:Thewikizoomer 628: 627: 626: 622: 621: 616: 615: 610: 606: 605:Thewikizoomer 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 591:Thewikizoomer 588: 587: 586: 582: 578: 577:Thewikizoomer 575: 571: 570: 569: 565: 561: 560:Thewikizoomer 557: 553: 552: 551: 547: 546: 541: 540: 534: 533: 532: 529: 528: 525:ShaanSengupta 518: 514: 513: 512: 508: 507: 502: 501: 496: 495: 494: 491: 490: 487:ShaanSengupta 480: 476: 475: 474: 470: 469: 464: 463: 457: 455: 452: 451: 448:ShaanSengupta 441: 437: 436: 435: 431: 430: 425: 424: 418: 417: 416: 413: 412: 409:ShaanSengupta 402: 401: 400: 396: 392: 388: 387: 386: 383: 382: 379:ShaanSengupta 372: 368: 367: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 330: 329: 326: 325: 322:ShaanSengupta 315: 311: 310: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296:community ban 293: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275: 274: 271: 270: 267:ShaanSengupta 260: 256: 255: 254: 253: 249: 245: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 210: 206: 202: 201: 199: 193: 190: 186: 185: 179: 162: 161: 154: 151: 149: 146: 145: 142: 141: 137: 132: 127: 126: 107: 106: 103: 99: 96: 94: 90: 89: 81: 77: 75: 72: 70: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 51: 47: 46:Learn to edit 43: 40: 35: 34: 31: 30: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1965:171.48.92.26 1945: 1891: 1848: 1825: 1687: 1650:topic area. 1622: 1593: 1518: 1494: 1489: 1485: 1466: 1427: 1423: 1405: 1368: 1331: 1298: 1279: 1257: 1244: 1243: 1233: 1223: 1210: 1208: 1201: 1191: 1174: 1172: 1159: 1155: 1144: 1124:instructions 1113: 1105: 1104: 1091: 1086: 1074: 1073: 1046:creation log 1013: 1005: 995: 977: 966: 964: 940:for deletion 917: 911: 889: 837: 817:✠ ZenDragoX✠ 794:✠ ZenDragoX✠ 772: 734: 696: 677: 618: 613: 543: 538: 521: 504: 499: 483: 466: 461: 444: 427: 422: 405: 375: 352: 348: 336: 332: 318: 294:closer to a 291: 286: 282: 263: 242: 218: 214:illegitimate 213: 200:indefinitely 195: 194: 135: 91: 1840:Ratnahastin 1822:Ratnahastin 1608:Ratnahastin 1590:Ratnahastin 1570:Newslaundry 1481:Ratnahastin 1463:Ratnahastin 1420:Ratnahastin 1402:Ratnahastin 1200:|decline = 1168:|3 = ~~~~}} 1120:autoblocked 1010:be reviewed 683:DreamRimmer 614:DreamRimmer 539:DreamRimmer 517:DreamRimmer 500:DreamRimmer 479:DreamRimmer 462:DreamRimmer 440:DreamRimmer 423:DreamRimmer 1889:block/ban. 1689:Lebensraum 1667:WP:NONAZIS 1490:Unofficial 1424:disruptive 1232:|accept = 1042:filter log 833:Zendrago X 752:Zendrago X 287:six months 205:sockpuppet 1911:Malerisch 1787:Malerisch 1709:Taj Mahal 1648:WP:CT/IPA 1576:Scroll.in 1511:this edit 1396:WP:ARBIPA 1141:use only: 1061:checkuser 1020:block log 975:finished. 823:(contact) 800:(contact) 687:Blablubbs 609:Blablubbs 153:Archive 2 148:Archive 1 82:if needed 65:Be polite 25:talk page 1986:Category 1486:Official 1457:this MfD 1032:contribs 629:Gotcha! 341:WP:EVADE 279:WP:EVADE 217:reasons 136:Archives 93:Archives 50:get help 19:This is 1864:Contact 1779:the RfC 1751:at AN/I 1743:removed 1737:to tag 1694:its MfD 1545:created 1209:If you 1175:decline 1173:If you 1055:unblock 961:deleted 867:Hello @ 738:Vikepro 574:WP:DUCK 554:I hope 345:WP:SOCK 209:allowed 198:blocked 180:Blocked 1844:Toddy1 1810:(talk) 1807:Toddy1 1765:pushed 1717:stated 1619:Toddy1 1535:(talk) 1532:Toddy1 1449:on ANI 1398:area. 1236:~~~~}} 1211:accept 1204:~~~~}} 927:(talk) 924:Toddy1 237:below. 219:is not 1879:WP:SO 1735:tried 1719:that 1347:Yamla 1314:Yamla 1295:Yamla 1275:Yamla 1260:Yamla 1106:Notes 1083:Yamla 1008:block 717:Yamla 713:WP:SO 391:Yamla 371:Yamla 357:Yamla 314:Yamla 300:Yamla 259:Yamla 244:Yamla 203:as a 78:Seek 1969:talk 1858:) | 1856:User 1828:talk 1791:talk 1715:and 1684:made 1681:been 1678:have 1596:talk 1519:only 1469:talk 1408:talk 1351:talk 1318:talk 1264:talk 983:talk 979:Soni 869:Izno 742:talk 721:talk 635:talk 620:talk 595:talk 581:talk 564:talk 556:this 545:talk 506:talk 468:talk 429:talk 395:talk 361:talk 343:and 304:talk 248:talk 67:and 1875:ZDX 1849:ZDX 1763:He 1733:He 1703:He 1661:on 1513:to 1488:vs 1328:you 1158:|2= 1065:log 985:) 349:far 292:far 23:'s 1988:: 1971:) 1881:. 1805:-- 1793:) 1578:, 1530:-- 1367:) 1353:) 1320:) 1266:) 1108:: 1077:: 1059:• 1053:• 1049:• 1044:• 1040:• 1035:• 1030:• 1026:• 1022:• 1012:: 963:. 922:-- 875:. 744:) 723:) 685:, 681:, 637:) 623:) 597:) 583:) 566:) 548:) 509:) 471:) 432:) 397:) 363:) 306:) 250:) 100:, 48:; 1967:( 1873:@ 1866:) 1862:( 1854:( 1830:) 1826:( 1789:( 1781:. 1760:. 1730:. 1700:. 1606:@ 1598:) 1594:( 1572:, 1479:@ 1471:) 1467:( 1418:@ 1410:) 1406:( 1349:( 1316:( 1293:@ 1273:@ 1262:( 1069:) 1067:) 1063:( 1018:( 981:( 809:@ 786:@ 740:( 719:( 633:( 617:( 603:@ 593:( 579:( 562:( 542:( 515:@ 503:( 477:@ 465:( 438:@ 426:( 393:( 369:@ 359:( 312:@ 302:( 257:@ 246:( 102:2 98:1 95:: 52:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index