31:
93:
ever. I think everyone at RCC realizes that there name tags are readable on commons. Regardless, if I can sneak it in - I'll notify people that if they really don't want to be ID'd - they need to work with the pictures on commons (not that they can futz up the old versions). Thanks for the notice - always glad people are giving me a heads up. --
92:
I dont know who "Brandt" is, (who is he?) but the way you mention is, I assume its a bad thing. I've had a talk with Cary Bass about not identifying people on commons - but in the case of RCC - I can't do much. With the number of pictures I'm uploading - I'm not bothering with any editing what so
195:
Also. I've been informed that there really isn't anyone here that "he" would be interested in. Most of the people aren't wikipedians, let alone en.wp admins. Either that or its nothing new. So I'm not going to worry about it. But again, I appreciate the heads up, and keep me up to date.
158:
Ok. I've got some info from #commons about the topic. I'll announce things here shortly and see what people think. We may end up deleting all the pictures from the category & restarting. Thanks for the heads up. Keep me apprised if anything changes.
127:— easiest thing to do is Google the name. Basically runs an "editor outing site" which (among other things) tries to post photos of names & addresses of editors & admins here.
38:
47:
17:
137:
78:
217:
180:
145:
114:
86:
124:
65:
197:
160:
94:
130:
71:
123:
I can't really explain Daniel Brandt as linking to anything about him will come under
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
68:; you may want to blur the name tags before you upload any more
25:
66:
trawling the photos on commons for names of participants
8:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
24:
29:
64:Just as a heads up, Brandt is
1:
238:
218:23:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
181:23:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
146:23:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
115:23:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
87:22:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
18:User talk:ShakataGaNai
42:of past discussions.
54:
53:
48:current talk page
229:
215:
209:
203:
178:
172:
166:
144:
142:
135:
112:
106:
100:
85:
83:
76:
33:
32:
26:
237:
236:
232:
231:
230:
228:
227:
226:
210:
204:
198:
173:
167:
161:
138:
131:
128:
107:
101:
95:
79:
72:
69:
62:
60:Heads up re RCC
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
235:
233:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
151:
150:
149:
148:
118:
117:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
234:
219:
216:
213:
207:
201:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
182:
179:
176:
170:
164:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
152:
147:
143:
141:
136:
134:
126:
122:
121:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
104:
98:
91:
90:
89:
88:
84:
82:
77:
75:
67:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
211:
205:
199:
174:
168:
162:
139:
132:
108:
102:
96:
80:
73:
63:
55:
43:
37:
125:WP:BADSITES
36:This is an
39:archive
202:hakata
165:hakata
99:hakata
140:scent
133:iride
81:scent
74:iride
16:<
129:—
70:—
214:ai
196:--
177:ai
159:--
111:ai
212:N
208:a
206:G
200:S
175:N
171:a
169:G
163:S
109:N
105:a
103:G
97:S
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.