31:
169:
278:
it is - i.e., why do we care about NetSPI? What makes them worth a wikipedia page? As long as you sort both of these, even if your article is short and without many sources, you can still create it in mainspace - maybe tag it with a stub tag and/or {{underconstruction}} and you'll be safe from speedy
303:
Thanks for the feedback. I will edit the page to show why people should care about NetSPI. Basically, the reason is that network and information security is a huge concern for individuals, companies, and countries like the U.S., and NetSPI has built a good reputation in helping to fend off the cyber
223:
deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the
255:
I have revised the page on NetSPI in an attempt to answer objections about its being promotional or not notable. My model has been the page for nCircle, a sometime partner of NetSPI. I think the media references meet the criteria for notability, and I have striven for a
Sergeant Friday ("Just the
330:
This is not exactly true. A7 only applies to a few specific types --- REAL people, REAL companies, REAL musical groups, REAL websites, and a few others. An article on a comic book character does not have to assert importance or significance as it is not about a real
273:
Burgo, glad to see you're rewriting it :) Remember, the reason why it went last time were G11 (blatant advertising) and A7 (doesn't state notability) - A7 bares some explanation, as is doesn't mean the subject isn't notable, but that the article doesn't state
327:
Simply because the subject is eligible, doesn't mean that any article on them is valid - As per WP:A7, any article which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant may be speedily deleted. ShakingSpirittalk 06:45, 21 April 2009
225:
81:
I have read through the information you posted and i have made several changes to not advertise or be on sided in my writing. But i can't see what else is causing a problem is it because of the contact information i added.
376:
I have revised the article on NetSPI some more, after learning how to handle external links better. Can you tell me the next steps? Is there a review period? What else do I need to do? Thanks very much for your help.
183:, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read
351:
Apologies for my wording (feel free to remove confusion and call me out on it on the original page) - in context we were talking about his deleted company's page, but I admit how I put it was technically incorrect.
121:
rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of
279:
deletion, and well on your way to writing a great encyclopedic article! Which you can improve from there :) If there's anything I can help with, let me know.
345:
362:
137:
64:
is it ok if I make an page on the tae kwon do association I am part of considered 2nd biggest in the U.K or is it too unimportant?
101:
129:
141:
384:
311:
263:
38:
340:
229:
188:
215:
209:
176:
162:
388:
359:
315:
289:
286:
267:
242:
239:
155:
105:
73:
47:
17:
89:
153:
124:
380:
307:
259:
133:
333:
97:
93:
69:
354:
281:
234:
194:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
146:
184:
144:. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –
180:
199:
179:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
65:
213:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
168:
25:
219:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
167:
118:
181:section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion
128:, and that you will not abuse it by reverting
210:the page that has been nominated for deletion
8:
232:the page or have a copy emailed to you.
138:Knowledge (XXG):New admin school/Rollback
224:page does get deleted, you can contact
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
136:. For information on rollback, see
24:
256:facts, Ma'am) tone in the text.
142:Knowledge (XXG):Rollback feature
29:
1:
78:Thank you for your response.
189:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Business
404:
389:16:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
363:20:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
346:20:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
325:I noticed that you wrote,
316:19:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
290:19:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
268:18:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
243:12:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
156:18:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
106:13:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
373:Greetings ShakingSpirit,
175:A tag has been placed on
74:13:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
177:User talk:Top10optimizer
163:User talk:Top10optimizer
191:for more information.
18:User talk:ShakingSpirit
228:to request that they
185:the guidelines on spam
172:
171:
85:Thanks in advanced.
42:of past discussions.
226:one of these admins
161:Speedy deletion of
173:
361:
288:
241:
109:
92:comment added by
54:
53:
48:current talk page
395:
381:Burgo Fitzgerald
357:
353:
336:
308:Burgo Fitzgerald
284:
280:
260:Burgo Fitzgerald
237:
233:
205:
204:
198:
149:
108:
86:
33:
32:
26:
403:
402:
398:
397:
396:
394:
393:
392:
371:
355:
334:
323:
300:ShakingSpirit,
298:
282:
252:ShakingSpirit,
250:
235:
202:
196:
195:
166:
147:
115:
87:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
401:
399:
370:
369:NetSPI Article
367:
366:
365:
335:I'm Spartacus!
322:
319:
297:
294:
293:
292:
249:
246:
165:
159:
114:
111:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
400:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
368:
364:
360:
358:
356:ShakingSpirit
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
343:
342:
338:
337:
329:
320:
318:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
295:
291:
287:
285:
283:ShakingSpirit
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
247:
245:
244:
240:
238:
236:ShakingSpirit
231:
227:
222:
218:
217:
216:the talk page
212:
211:
201:
192:
190:
186:
182:
178:
170:
164:
160:
158:
157:
154:
151:
150:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
126:
120:
112:
110:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
83:
79:
76:
75:
71:
67:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
379:
375:
372:
341:
339:
332:
326:
324:
306:
302:
299:
275:
258:
254:
251:
220:
214:
207:
193:
174:
148:Juliancolton
145:
132:edits or to
122:
116:
84:
80:
77:
63:
55:
43:
37:
208:the top of
187:as well as
88:—Preceding
36:This is an
331:person.---
304:bad guys.
134:revert-war
130:good-faith
123:reverting
94:WillliamR3
125:vandalism
66:Kyle25157
60:a article
113:Rollback
102:contribs
90:unsigned
119:granted
117:I have
39:archive
296:NetSPI
248:NetSPI
230:userfy
221:speedy
200:hangon
328:(UTC)
16:<
385:talk
312:talk
264:talk
140:and
98:talk
70:talk
276:why
206:to
387:)
321:A7
314:)
266:)
203:}}
197:{{
152:|
104:)
100:•
72:)
383:(
310:(
262:(
96:(
68:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
