User talk:Sonny1998 - Knowledge (XXG)

1160:

the time of other authors who could make more construtive contributions in the time it takes to check and revert your edits. Please do consider changing your editing behaviour in order to co-operate with other users and make useful contributions to our project. Again: if you don't know how to do certain things according to Knowledge (XXG) customs, just ask one of the more experienced users and everyone will be happy to assist you. Don't hesitate to ask me or any other Wikipedian. Kind regards. --

1604: 1591: 1705: 1350: 968: 1181: 933: 897: 841: 658: 271: 219: 1384:, nor changed your editing practising in accordance with the advice you have received from experienced editors. Please use talkpages, this — your own — usertalk page as well as article talk pages. Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be a collaborative project; you need to talk to people when they talk to you. The only thing to do to get your attention seems to be to 436: 373: 311: 1275:

you have been asked several times to please stop your unconstructive and disruptive editing behaviour. Please consider this your last warning. Please make yourself familiar with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If you do not understand them, ask experienced Knowledge (XXG) editors to help

1159:

with adequate sources. This is very important if you want to make useful contributions to Knowledge (XXG). As of now, nearly all of your edits get reverted by other users, because they are not compatible with Knowledge (XXG)'s fundamental objectives. This is not what I suppose you want and it costs

1280:

the aims of this project and its volunteers. Users who repeatedly contravene Knowledge (XXG) rules may and will be blocked from editing. If you continue to arbitrarily add unsourced content, you will be reported and blocked. I would be happy if you could avoid this by simply changing your approach

1480:

I see you haven't taken on any of the advice I gave you in my block message above. Please read it again (if you ever did read it). You've been blocked for two weeks. You'll soon be blocked indefinitely if you continue to ignore everything you're told about how Knowledge (XXG) works. If you think

1676:

is a basic principle of Knowledge (XXG). Please understand that anyone who does not accept this principle, cannot contribute to this project. If you are unsure or do not understand Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or do not know how to create a reference, please inform yourself at the

1685:. Alternatively, you may always ask other, more experienced editors to help you. Most Wikipedians are helpful and will be glad to assist you. Please take this advice seriously: you have already been blocked repeatedly. In case that you continue this way, your next block will be 1619: 1731:

This is a collaborative work. If you are not willing to discuss your edits with others, you are not welcome here. Any admin is encouraged to unblock if/when this user begins to discuss their edits, no need to check in with me first.

1048:

saying that the new party is liberal, social liberal, green conservative etc. Not an editor (like you) who reads the programme and decides that some of the points are to be considered liberal, green conservative etc.

1044:. Otherwise there would be constant argument among editors how to analyse, assess and classify the content of a certain primary source. What we need in this specific case is a reliable source 1665:

please remember to always fill in the edit summary field below the editing box to describe and explain your edits. This makes it possible for other users to understand your edits. Thank you.

1040:(the "carta dei valory") and drew your own conclusions. But this is not asked for on Knowledge (XXG). This project only wants to gather and present information that is already published in 1440: 510: 799: 1436: 506: 192:. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 1623: 795: 1388:, and accordingly I've done so, for 48 hours. Please be more responsive when you return from the block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 1709: 1354: 1072:). As we obviously share a field of interest, I hope to co-operate with you in a constructive way and have fun editing articles together in the future. Kind regards. -- 1032:. Apparently, you have read and analysed Forza Italia's basic programme ("carta dei valori") and matched it to terms of political ideologies. This approach is called 1060:

in order to make constructive and useful contributions to Knowledge (XXG). If you have any questions, you can ask me or any other experienced Wikipedian for help (

1380:

engaged in any discussion with any of the people who have attempted to talk with you here, and to inform you about Knowledge (XXG)'s policies with regard to

1547: 1450: 1323: 1242: 1232: 1114: 809: 756: 626: 573: 563: 520: 1228: 1104: 559: 99: 95: 1615: 909: 869: 670: 283: 231: 57: 1100: 746: 157:, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered 67: 742: 1498: 1405: 1313: 1543: 1446: 1319: 1238: 1110: 805: 752: 622: 569: 516: 1668:

Please also be reminded that you have been warned many times not to do arbitrary edits, changes, additions and deletions without providing

1309: 1198:

Warning for repeatedly making unsourced changes to a large number of articles, including mass changes to articles about political parties.

1148: 1053: 1428: 616: 498: 787: 103: 88: 1537: 612: 448: 1057: 1037: 853: 1533: 30: 1540:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1443:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1316:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1235:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1107:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 802:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 749:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 619:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 566:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 513:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 138: 62: 42: 22: 1682: 696:

for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

1482: 1389: 1033: 901: 1152: 1029: 107: 52: 677:

and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

666: 385: 290:

and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

238:

and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

1193: 993: 949: 849: 1185: 976: 937: 913: 873: 674: 287: 235: 154: 33:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Knowledge (XXG): 1520: