User talk:Solomon7968/Archive3

1625:. Very time consuming but so far I've already redirected some villages. If you actually see most of the major towns even those could largely be summarized in a table. I'm taking a break from it for now, haven't done the coordinates from M onwards though if you want to continue. See the template I created at the bottom for other districts. Ideally we should have this sort of thing for every district and state of India. But it's too much for me to take on. It would take over two years to do it all, all day, every day!! I'm going to add a lot of missing villages and try to make this a model list for others to follow. But if we could somehow create automated lists of settlements with coordinates and a table to fill in it could become a gradually thing to fill them and redirect the more redundant/problematic articles. Let me know what you think.♦ 2162:

editor was unfamiliar with our policy on verifiability and reliable sources. (We don't keep information because it's informative; we keep information because it's verifiable.) Furthermore, I could not (and still cannot) find a reliable source supporting the claim that the subject attended University of Delhi. I understand that this article is the subject of some emotional editing because of its political subject, but I have no dog in that fight. I have also read the essay you linked to, and must say that the author's argument is not convincing.

1925: 31: 632: 77: 901: 2355: 2211: 1835: 1735: 1648: 1535: 1015: 427: 2006: 1494: 564: 2523:

has been considered as relevant for scientist bio entries) and the possibility to find an information somewhere else does not seem to me to be an argument against its publication on wikipedia, specially in this very particular case, MathGenealogy being unknown to most Knowledge (XXG) readers (you don't need to be a mathematician to be interested by a bio).

2180:. Infact I *never* heard his name and only it came to my notice by your template warning (of the editor). I get that you may not have realized that he is a veteran editor (he is editing since 2004). I am sorry if I offend you but blind reverts are never helpful (for editor retention and otherwise) and the said edit is by no definition a 1984:

Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to

1357:

I don't understand why you need to do that, you can just as well move the AfC candidate to "FOO (dab)". Why you need to move FOO to FOO (dab2) and then move AfC to FOO, and then move FOO to FOO (dab) and then move FOO (dab2) to FOO is what I don't understand. I'm not involved in the AfC process so I

2644:

But numerous editors on the talk page have supported the inclusion of Sen, my edits are by no means unilateral. I don't know if you're Bengali, but Yunus and Sen are the most influential global Bengali icons and frankly I can't think of an acceptable collage without both of them. As for Netaji, why

2522:

The 15th August 2013, you revised the entry Jaroslav Nešetřil, suppressing the indication of doctoral students as "not directly related to the subject himself and can be easily accessed via MathGenealogy". Nevertheless, doctoral_students is a standard entry of the Infobox scientist template (hence

2161:

Clearly the editor failed to add sources in this case, and the editor's comment ("added this because i wanted do know how he got to law after IIT. Will request all battling editors to be help wikipedia and keep the bits that are informative instead of wholesale reverts") seemed to suggest that the

367:

I don't want to impose, but you could look at each of the 4 subsections and comment on each. In most cases that will require reading the sources cited, because the general problem here is that one editor misinterprets those sources. Sorry to ask again but this has been a very long, rather silly

1309:

Also, please don't move articles from titles so that new articles can be moved there from AfC. The new article should have the disambiguation (if it passes the AfC criteria, which in this case it apparently hasn't), but you shouldn't be moving pages such as you did.

353:. Several people keep saying there's a worldwide conspiracy of powerful Harvard graduates manipulating Knowledge (XXG) articles along with interest rates and world copper prices. (In case you were wondering, that's actually true, but don't tell anyone I told you.) 2145:) so there was nothing stopping you from do a simple Google search or add a {{cn}} tag. What prompted me to revert you was not your revert but your enthusiastic template warning the editor. He is a veteran editor and knows policies well, I suggest you read 949:

Sorry, but I just don't see a coherent concept here around which an article could be formed. What would prove me wrong would be sources specifically discussing the term in some detail, not just as a cute catchword for something vaguely related to Harvard.

2058:

has come on quite a lot and we now have race, sex and class to add to religion and mysticism .... maybe we can find a better hook. Could you copy edit or clean up that photo of him? Interesting guy.... and we seem to have a better bio that the ODNB!

927:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2447:). The essay "A Master Rediscovered" by Tapati Guha Thakurta elaborates on this issue. I have gathered the information from her essay, and wrote it in my own words. But I don't know how to cite a source or text which is unavailable online. 522: 279: 518: 275: 2674:

Nothing serious (compared to enWP standards!) but it really seems odd to have two economists (yeah I know the story of Yunus). But I am not going to edit war over it, will post on the talk page instead. BTW, best wishes for 2014.

2582:

is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at

2118:(a guideline) which states that "you should not edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission." I take both our BLP policy and our behavioral guidelines very seriously. I hope that you do the same. 1990: 2109:

I find it amusing that you've accused me of disruptive editing for politely reminding an editor not to add unsourced material to biographies of living people. Adding unsourced material to a BLP is a violation the

931:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

112: 1344:

hence the problem. Hope it helps. (BTW, the original decline reason of the AFC is not valid; unless an academic is Nobel laureate or so, secondary sources aka gossip stories are not readily available).

739: 2900: 2876: 2860: 1777: 2908: 1945: 2884: 2868: 510: 263: 2073:

Yes he was definitely a Interesting guy, I will (re)read the Miss Pigot story and clean up it, maybe there should be an article about her and the orphanage? Thank you for the improvements.

2570: 2396: 745: 721: 703: 1877: 706:: Wiki Loves Monuments; ECNC photo competition; Europeana Fashion Edit-a-thon Antwerp; Fourth Dutch Wikipedian in Residence; Wiki loves libraries workshop; 10 years of CC licenses 160: 148: 142: 2726: 1577: 1507: 1263: 679: 667: 1358:

have no idea about that -- all I saw was one comment saying not approved and another questioning approval but eitherways that doesn't affect my concern with the move. cheers —

715: 697: 673: 2824:

Sorry for not replying further. I do use Google Books but a typical problem with Orientalists (Sinologists, Indologists etc.) is that the usual readily available sources are

2722: 1686: 1114: 709: 691: 685: 2892: 1057: 577: 130: 118: 1110: 1336:

topic here. I intended to move the theatre director back to "Dinesh Thakur" after accepting the AFC (since if the page history is only redirect then it can be moved via

733: 124: 2502:

There is an article about the group by the Christian Science Monitory, enough to meet the threshold to pass CSD, take it to AfD if you still think it should be deleted.

2310: 924: 2578:, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2253: 2019: 727: 136: 2306: 465: 2584: 154: 319:

I responded to your post re professorships, and in return (well, maybe just out of the goodness of your own heart) perhaps you will be brave enough to wade in at

2591:. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! 751: 1622: 1266:

but in case you didn't see it: you wrote there "This article submission has been approved". Why was it approved? Where is the evidence that the subject passes

2141:

policy, true, but this case wasn't. There were several sources readily available (the official facebook, twitter accounts also mentioned it but they are not

2736: 2320: 1462: 1409: 1124: 913: 835: 532: 289: 2929: 2825: 1771: 166: 1189:

I was intending to fix the article a while back and watchlisted it but got distracted by other issues. The relevant notability guideline for her would be

1452: 1399: 2146: 825: 350:

Note there are 4 separate subsections on 4 disputed passages. Pace yourself -- subclinical paranoia runs high, complete with comparisons to Watergate

1448: 1395: 1867: 821: 768: 2799:

I did a Google Books search but I didn't see a biography of him in it. However I did run into a citation for a critique of his translation of

2766:

It is unnecessary to pipe links like ] or to change redirects. Please also remember to move talk pages when you move the associated articles.

2801: 2732: 2574:. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at 2316: 1458: 1405: 1236: 1120: 831: 528: 285: 2524: 2114:

policy, and we're admonished to "be very firm about the use of high-quality sources." For examples of truly disruptive editing, please see

1176: 1340:

i.e. G6 is not necessary) and moving the mathematician to "Dinesh Thakur (mathematician)". Apparently AFC namespace pages cannot be moved

1164:. I still don't see the claim to notability, though. The article is on my watchlist if you'd like to reply on that talk page. Thanks! 873: 869: 183: 2918: 2463: 2832:. So unless someone has access to pay walled sources (which is not the case with me) it is very difficult to expand the articles. 797: 212: 2829: 641: 1989:. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at 2602: 2729:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2313:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1455:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1402:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1117:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 828:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 525:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 282:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2714: 2630: 2616: 2415: