565:
represents an exquisite level of civility in itself. Actually, I had completely forgotten about that notice on your talk page, and upon reading it again, I must say I am not too proud of the underlying sarcasm I also had in that post along some portion of good intentions. I guess I was pretty much taken aback by the opposition to what I considered an absolutely brilliant idea (at the time). I think that now I have a more nuanced view on the relations and differences between EN and
Commons. It is something I have learned to appreaciate more after nominating three images at FPC with a featured rate of 2/3. I respect that you want to focus on FPC and PPR work on EN. It is correct that I had hoped a higher degree of synergy between EN and Commons were to prefer, but my pragmatic approach now is to realize that the projects are just quite different implementations of basically the same goals. The civility thing means a lot to me, as my ways were
1186:. Our cabin was at the seventh floor. In the first night we decided to leave the window opened. My husband told me: "Sure the waves would not reach here." Well, the waves did not, we reached the waves, when the ship was on her side. They have bed belts there. Mine did not work. I wanted to call somebody to fix it, but George said let's wait until morning. I wish I did not listen to him. In the middle of the night I was shout out flying off my bed :) I still cannot understand how come I did not hurt myself because I landed on the floor few meters away from my bed. Then we both knew: if bed belts are present you'd better use them :) Kim, I wanted to ask you, where in your opinion the waves were bigger in my images or in the one that was taken from the boat? Thanks,--
513:
I've decided to focus my meager efforts here on WP within the FPC and PPR processes, but I wanted to drop you a few lines to let you know, first, that it was not in any way my intention to ignore your request out of spite or apathy and, second, to offer you my admiration for the sheer amount of work you've done with images here and on COM and the amount of energy you've expended toward making the entire project better. While we're going ahead in EN in a different direction than I suppose you were looking for, your well-thought out arguments and civility helped shape things for the better. For your effort, please accept this, the barnstar of civility.
1534:
1379:
1943:
1666:
1863:
594:
1612:
108:
2003:
1720:
1225:. Few years later Explorer hit an iceberg and sank in Antarctica. Smaller accidents happen all the time, but IMO people, who want to travel there, should know what they are looking for and not complain. In Antarctica the weather could change very fast and in a very dramatic way. All the time we used a helicopter to go somewhere they first were flying out some supply because nobody could say, if when it is time to go back, the helicopters still will be able to fly. BTW about helicopters, it reminded me a funny story about our landing at
1229:. Using helicopters was out of the question because of a very bad weather. Zodiacs could not be used either because the Shelf is way too high, yet we still were able to get there. They used cargo containers to lower us down. The wind was strong. When I was down at the ice, and George was still on the ship, a strong gust got the ship few meters off to the sea. George gladly yelled: "Goodbye, I'll send you post card":) Then, when we walked the shelf, we've found a crevasse. It was slippery, but we sure had some fun
1903:
307:
1815:
264:
1013:
21:
650:
1772:
1471:
1148:, which is of course much better than mine. Still I believe that the images I took have EV on their own. IMO the images I took from the first location show what Mavericks is about, I mean Mavericks are not just big waves, they have a very special break. Here's one more photo-montage from the first location
920:
1216:
So you are asking, which wave is the largest? My immmediate impression is that yours are the largest, but it is really hard to tell as the zoom and everything is deceptive in determining relative sizes of objects. At least the break in your waves seem more "violent". Do you have the answer yourself,
1166:
I agree that making a photo montage seems like an adequate way to show the dynamics of a maverick wave. I see you point about being in a boat. I would perhaps be more worried about the personal safety than being sea sick. I have toured with danish naval vessels off the west coast of
Greenland during
749:
contacted several administrators as well as frequent
Featured Picture and FPC contributors, and notified them about the project. I have also done the same with the Knowledge (XXG) Signpost and WikiProject Photography. If the Signpost does an article on VP, it'll be great for the project's publicity.
728:
You're welcome to reuse the counter template. But I am not too keen about you reusing the
Commons Valued image logo for WP:VP though. I fear it will lead to confusion as the two projects are slightly different:-( Could you reconsider that part of it? Besides that I wish you the best of luck with the
483:
Thanks. It is a little exciting I must say (here 45 m before the opning). It has been a lot of work by me and many others, and I am anxious if the reviews will be sufficiently qualified. That aspect, is for me, the largest risk in the project. I certainly expect that in the beginning there will also
1434:
Hello
Slaunger! Thank you for your question on the Science Reference Desk. Your question is more likely to attract a prompt and quality response from the Mathematics Science Desk. For that reason I have deleted your question from the Science Desk and posted it on the Mathematics Desk. (I see it
666:
project sets out to identify and encourage users' efforts in providing valuable images of high encyclopedic value, and to build up a resource for editors from other
Wikimedia projects seeking such educational images for use online. The project also provides recognition to contributors who have made
512:
First, please accept my apologies for taking so long to reply to your message on my talk page. To be honest, I had been getting a bit wikibonked about images processes and just couldn't put an appropriate amount of thought into it again at that point. Rather than working within your project on COM,
52:
flowers to be pretty small (about 5 mm across I'm guessing?), that is one ENORMOUS mite! Far far bigger than any I've seen with my own eyes. My guess would be
Trombidiidae as well but beyond that I am a bit lost. I will have a bit of a dig, I'm sure such a large, brightly coloured species must have
1079:
Thanks for remembering my questions about the
Maverick. So you went out there, eventually! Anyway, I see what you mean. It is really impossible to get good shots under such conditions. You need to be in a helicoptor or in a nearby boat to get better shooting conditions. I do see the surfer in your
1020:
Knowledge (XXG) probably has enough
Mandelbrot-related featured images now, but I want to ask for your opinion on this image nonetheless because I think it's the most fantastic rendering of the set yet. This one is not based upon escape time but how close the iterative function orbit passes to two
234:
Yeah, but I wont bother with yousendit. I am just now doing a restitch of the hole thing using the newest bleeding edge version of Hugin and I plan to upload that in an unprocessed state in the highest jpeg quality possible once I have cropped it. Oh, and then I also intend to do another edit try.
844:
Hi Mila, Unfortunately, I have never seen a mirage, or - at least I have not been conscious about seeing one, if I have ;-) I have been in
Greenland twice. First time in June-August, 2007 in Upernavik, but there the sun never set or rose for the first 2.5 months. The second time was late October,
883:
Hi again Mila. Thank you those nice new photos. i like the one in the lower right very much. It is as if the conatiners are floating. I work with radars including their propagation. Similar effects can sometimes be seen in radar, and sometimes you can see far over the normal radar horizon due to
1253:
Not a problem at all. As always I find your stories interesting to read. For a real wave expert you should probably consult a physical oceanographer. I once told a user called 2+2=4 where to find one in relation to stitching photos with waves. That is, before I knew that 2+2=4 already knew that
748:
will hopefully be designing the personalized seal for the project. I thought it could show the VI seal on an open book, or something like that. She's busy at the moment, but hopefully will be able to design it as soon as she has time. In the meanwhile, I'm just getting the project going. I have
564:
Hi Matt, Thank you so much for this barnstar of civility! Previously, I have gotten barnstars from users who share approximately the same views as myself, and I consider it a special honor to get one from a previous opponent in a heated debate. For me, that you get back to me in this spirit
1317:
Thanks, Kim, it is kind of you. Honestly after I was the subject of 5+ hours of unwarranted harassment, personal attacks, and very harassing SPI, I doubt I will ever again edit I/P conflict articles. BTW how much are you aware of what happened to me on January 25 here on English wikipedia?
1094:
There are accidents with spectators almost every year, probably more than with the surfers. Today we went to a different location, the same beach that was hit by the wave yesterday. From the beach itself one hardly could see anything at all. There's is a hill to hike, but it is very steep
1233:. IMO the only thing that could, and maybe should stop traveling to Antarctica is the concern about environment. BTW I was told that this season or the next one will be the last of operating tourists icebreakers in Antarctica because they were ordered to use special, very expensive fuel.
97:
1144:. Much, much better images could have been taken from both locations. My 300 mm lens is a very old, cheap and not good one at all, I used no tripod, I probably used a wrong settings, and I did not do anything to reduce the sun impact. Here's the image that somebody took from a boat
1121:
Thanks for sharing your photos and experiences, (although I am amused that you do not share the photos with us at Commons, but uploads them locally, but please do not comment on that as I've seen that pattern so many times before). Was it worthwhile then, to climb that steep hill?
1601:
1213:. Both of them cruise in antarctic waters during winter and both of them have had serious accidents there. As I understand it, it is being discussed if cruising with passengers for leisure in (ant)arctic waters should be allowed at all, or if it is simply too dangerous.
927:
Some time ago you asked the user Zom-B if a new Mandelbrot zoom-in could be created at twice the size of the current one. I've created a new zoom in at twice the size (all though it doesn't zoom in as deep). I just wondered if you think this is featured image worthy?
1080:
composite photo, but I am glad you told me to look hard, as he is really tiny. But, wow, that is one huge wave he is surfing on. It looks really crazy. From the news you send it seems like it was not without risk to be a spectator as well. Seems pretty dramatic. --
1220:
Yes, I was very lucky I did not hurt myself. The next cruise one guy had a very bad trauma. They should have returned back and take him out. The travel to Antarctica is dangerous. We've been to Antarctica two times. First time we went with Explorer
1183:
1167:
storms in October and in smaller vessels in the Baltic Sea during a storm last summer. There are powerful prescribale medicaments available which can suppress seasick symptoms a lot. I have used them on those occasions and they really helped. --
1200:
Wow, that is a dramatic episode at sea you are reporting from there. It have never experienced anything as crazy as that. It seems like the Antarctic waters are really dangerous. I read yesterday about two arctic cruise ships that anchored in
235:
Previously I have never come further than selective Gaussian blur when it comes to noise removal, but today I have bought myself a fancy pro noise remover and I am impressed by some intial tests and i want to try using that on the image. --
1181:
Yes, when we were going to Antarctica I took some medicine too, but even with the medicine I was only able to stay in the bed. As soon as I was getting up I felt no good. Of course the storm was absolutely tremendous. It was icebreaker
452:
Good luck and best wishes for the VI launch tomorrow at Commons. I know you haven't done it all yourself, but I think it's fair to say you've been the driving force behind it. I look forward to dropping by to have a look. Cheers,
1655:
1152:. IMO photo-montage might have some advantages because by doing it, I am showing the development and the break of the special waves. I'm thinking about taking a boat tour one day, but I am really afraid to get sea sick. --
1547:
1397:
358:
Hi Slaunger. Thanks for your comments and vote when this went through FPC talk. There was a pretty clear consensus for Option 2 which involved setting up the project here. I have developed a trial version at
743:
I thought you would raise that objection. I'm not happy about using the seal myself. I have, however, requested a special seal for the Knowledge (XXG) Valued pictures department. The Commons illustrator,
1044:
Hi Kim, You've asked me about Mavericks. Today we went to see Mavericks competition. The waves were far, far, far away, against the sun, and the conditions were rather hazy. There were many people there
192:
Thanks. I have tried sending it for the last two hours via my gmail account. I have now aborted the operation since there was no reports on progress and I am doing a retry. The file is 114 Megs... --
799:
I agree the COM:VI seal is attractive and eyecatching. It was also a long process involving several iterations which finally led to the logo. Thank you for modifying pages which link to the logo. --
993:
Excellent! Also I'm moving on to arbitrary-precision (emulated floating point numbers) and I might be able to zoom even deeper than this. Too bad it'll probably take a month to create each frame. --
1956:
1684:
1308:
into autoreplying with. "Really?", "Tell me more", "That's fantastic!", "It is very interesting. I have never seen anything like that myself!" and you can keep them stories coming into eternity. --
957:
I think owing to the large number of support votes on Knowledge (XXG) it'll certainly be featured. It seems an awful shame to delete it. Can't we have the image on Knowledge (XXG) and Wikimedia? --
1804:
1876:
1630:
607:
126:
2016:
1738:
1478:
1355:(indents reset) I followed it in its aftermath and know all the details of what happened afterwards. I noticed it when I saw your page was blocked with the you-know-what scary summary. --
1786:
For your outstanding contributions for Featured Pictures in 2014 you are hereby award this WikiProject Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history Wikiproject Coordinators,
682:
to nominate an image, or to help review the nominations. Anyone with an account on Knowledge (XXG) is welcome to nominate images, and also to take part in the open review process.
1021:
lines and a single point. These "orbit trap" shapes are than projected across the image in a distorted form (distorted lines and points can be seen). Maybe I should try making a
667:
an effort to contribute enyclopedic images of difficult subjects which are very hard or nigh on impossible to obtain. The project will run alongside the existing Knowledge (XXG)
367:
for comments. Feel free to drop by and give your thoughts, especially as regards ideas for how well this integrates with the COM:VI stuff and whether they could work together. --
1222:
1709:
1272:
After rereading what I wrote yesterday evening it struck me that it could be considered a snarky comment. That was not the intention. It was intended to be humorous, and
253:
769:
think you should start out without a logo at all (or be a little more patient). Be careful with logos, they have a strong effect, and the current logo is mesleading. --
1057:. We saw the waves alright from where we were, but surfers were too tiny. Here is 4-frames image of a single wave. The surfer is seen at every frame. Do you see him
75:
I am aware of have much longer legs than this and tend to be more drably coloured but a body length of 3 mm is seriously huge for a mite. I shall carry on digging!
1255:
1906:
573:. So getting this barnstar is a nice cancellation of that other incident. I am now again mainly focusing on COM:VI, which will be go live June 1 at 0:00 UTC. --
2006:
1137:
1946:
1537:
1100:
597:
1290:
That's OK. I like jokes, but please be careful what you are asking for, I mean my travel stories. I could tell you a new story every day for few years :)--
1866:
869:
Kim, I'd be missing you. May I please ask you to come back to Knowledge (XXG) as soon as possible? Best wishes and good luck with whatever you're doing.--
1096:
484:
be a learning curve for the reviewers and nominators, and it will be interesting to see if the guidelines are too complicated, or what else happens. --
156:
1916:
1833:
1061:(please do not mistake a surfer with jet ski, which are seen much better. Photographing surfers in Santa Cruz is much easier and rewarding I'd say. --
320:
282:
668:
310:
1842:
1838:
1747:
1743:
1693:
1689:
1639:
1635:
1406:
1402:
291:
287:
135:
131:
900:
Sorry about the late reply. I didn't realise I was signed out of wiki for so long. I have added an approximate location for the species. Thanks --
1436:
783:
I'll fix up the pages that link to the logo now. Its a shame we don't have our own yet: the Commons VP seal is both attractive and eyecatching.
679:
364:
1236:
I have no my own opinion about the size of the wave. I asked you because I believe you know much more about the oceans and waves than I do.
532:
1533:
1378:
860:
863:. I see mirages of land few times per year, but mirages of ship much more rarely. BTW I found out that few of my images were used in
1050:
723:
I flagrantly stole the countdown timer from you. No regrets, though. Thanks a load. We hope to see you at the nominations page soon.
1149:
672:
1942:
1665:
788:
754:
712:
1862:
1611:
1551:
1304:
If that could distract you away from getting into problems editing Israel-Palestinian articles. I am all ears. I might adjust
611:
593:
382:
Hi Jjron, thank you for your notice. I saw you had published your proposal a few hours ago. I will go study it right away. --
324:
107:
1519:
1058:
1030:
998:
979:
962:
948:
933:
864:
401:
2002:
1719:
845:
2008, but was only one week and work related (I was busy working). The weather and visibility was bad as well, so no... --
566:
173:
Hey, if you want to email me, we can figure out a way to get the full size TIF to me and Ill certainly work on it for you.
2019:
is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on December 21, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
1919:
is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 9, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
1145:
1141:
570:
1959:
is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on October 22, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
1825:
1730:
1676:
1622:
1389:
274:
118:
1879:
is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on August 4, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
884:
ducting. I will come back to Wikimedia Projects, just do not know when. Perhaps when I get myself a better camera;-) --
691:
663:
642:
1046:
1515:
1026:
994:
975:
958:
944:
929:
1841:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
1746:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
1692:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
1638:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
1581:
Thanks Howcheng. I have tried to make a few improvements to the caption and also suggested some improvements on
1405:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
290:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
134:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
2020:
1960:
1920:
1880:
1555:
974:
Can the image be featured on Wikimedia Commons AND Knowledge (XXG)? Can the same image be "double featured"? --
615:
328:
1487:
1230:
2028:
1968:
1928:
1888:
905:
98:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Image:Iceberg with hole near sanderson hope 2007-07-28 2.jpg
1022:
943:
Will the featured image status be automatically transferred to WC or do we have to vote again there? --
919:
551:
518:
1902:
1814:
829:
May I please ask you, if you've ever seen a mirage? They should be common in Greenland. Thank you.--
306:
263:
1791:
1602:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/OY-DIZ SAI KZ IV landing Danish Air Show 2014-06-23.jpg
1449:
360:
87:
76:
54:
1569:
745:
629:
342:
1239:
I am afraid I am taking too much of your time with my never ending stories. Sorry and thanks. --
20:
1103:. We still climbed that hill! The last competition few people got injured on that hill. Here's
2024:
1979:
1964:
1924:
1884:
1497:
1012:
901:
219:
182:
699:
695:
547:
514:
458:
409:
372:
164:
1305:
1054:
48:
Thanks for showing me the mite pic. The first thing I have to say is that even given the
86:
Hi. Sorry I've not been in touch, not had much chance to dig! I'll get back to you soon
1787:
1440:
1323:
1295:
1244:
1226:
1191:
1157:
1112:
1099:
and slippery because of the loose rocks. Getting up is hard, getting down even more so:
1066:
874:
834:
784:
750:
708:
1983:
1846:
1751:
1697:
1643:
1586:
1561:
1356:
1309:
1277:
1259:
1168:
1123:
1081:
846:
800:
770:
730:
621:
574:
485:
427:
383:
334:
236:
193:
174:
1771:
1582:
1554:
on October 17, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
614:
on October 24, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
1184:
File:Icebreaker Kapitan Khlebnikov in the Ross Sea, Antarctica from helicopter.OGG
1016:
Mandelbrot set rendered using a combination of cross and point shaped orbit traps.
31:
1493:
1470:
1410:
649:
531:
327:
on June 21, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
215:
210:
Hey Slaunger, it's too big to send directly, you will need to send it to me via
178:
1206:
27:
1104:
454:
405:
404:. Not meaning to butt in though, there's too much there for me to absorb... --
368:
295:
160:
139:
72:
1656:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Alhambra from Mirador San Nicolas
1439:. I hope you eventually receive a lot of useful information. Best regards.
1210:
1319:
1291:
1240:
1202:
1187:
1153:
1108:
1062:
870:
830:
1809:
1714:
1660:
1606:
1373:
258:
102:
765:
Then, since you do not intend to actually resuse the COM:VI logo, then I
64:
1492:
Thank you for your contribution to promote images of renewable energy.
546:
For keeping a cool head and staying focused during heated discussions!
2032:
1991:
1972:
1932:
1892:
1849:
1795:
1754:
1700:
1646:
1594:
1575:
1523:
1501:
1456:
1421:
1364:
1327:
1312:
1299:
1285:
1267:
1254:
user ;-) Speaking of related persona sharing the same IP, did you see
1248:
1195:
1176:
1161:
1136:
Well, here's the image (4 frames image) that was taken from the cliff
1131:
1116:
1101:
File:Spectators are getting off the cliff after watching Mavericks.jpg
1089:
1070:
1034:
1002:
983:
966:
952:
937:
909:
878:
854:
838:
808:
794:
778:
760:
738:
718:
658:
The project goes live for nominations on 10 November, 2008 at 0:00 UTC
635:
582:
555:
522:
493:
462:
435:
413:
391:
376:
348:
298:
244:
223:
201:
186:
168:
142:
90:
79:
57:
68:
859:
I asked about mirages because few days ago I saw a really nice few:
1548:
File:Naajaat panorama 2007-08-09 2 cropped USM downsampled edit.jpg
1398:
File:Naajaat panorama 2007-08-09 2 cropped USM downsampled edit.jpg
1256:
commons:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Advice required I think
71:
always have the body clearly divided into two sections and all the
2001:
1941:
1901:
1861:
1532:
1011:
918:
592:
305:
1805:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Viborg Katedralskole
1957:
File:Alhambra evening panorama Mirador San Nicolas sRGB-1.jpg
1685:
File:Alhambra evening panorama Mirador San Nicolas sRGB-1.jpg
1877:
File:OY-DIZ SAI KZ IV landing Danish Air Show 2014-06-23.jpg
1813:
1718:
1664:
1631:
File:OY-DIZ SAI KZ IV landing Danish Air Show 2014-06-23.jpg
1610:
1377:
608:
Image:Iceberg with hole near sanderson hope 2007-07-28 2.jpg
262:
127:
Image:Iceberg with hole near sanderson hope 2007-07-28 2.jpg
106:
1053:. We could have gone to other location, but I do not think
365:
Wikipedia_talk:Picture_peer_review#Valued_Pictures_Proposal
211:
2017:
File:Kongensbro gravel pit 2014-09-17 Diliff Reprocess.jpg
1739:
File:Kongensbro gravel pit 2014-09-17 Diliff Reprocess.jpg
867:. Yesterday I got two complimetary tickets to the Academy.
400:
Re VI/VP. Heh, I just left a comment at Commons VI Talk
1710:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Gravel pit
254:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Upernavik
1479:
Middelgrunden wind farm 2009-07-01 edit filtered.jpg
1223:
File:Adelie chicks in antarctica and Ms Explorer.jpg
426:
Nevertheless your comment made sense. Thank you. --
1140:. A surfer is seen in every frame. Here's one more
1514:Thanks for that, I'll go over there and vote too.
1435:has already attracted one short reply.) See the
684:
15:
1546:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture
1462:Selected picture on the renewable energy portal
606:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture
319:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture
567:recently considered incivil by a Commons admin
273:An image uploaded by you has been promoted to
117:An image uploaded by you has been promoted to
2023:. Thank you for all of your contributions! —
1963:. Thank you for all of your contributions! —
1923:. Thank you for all of your contributions! —
1883:. Thank you for all of your contributions! —
1824:An image created by you has been promoted to
1729:An image created by you has been promoted to
1675:An image created by you has been promoted to
1621:An image created by you has been promoted to
1388:An image created by you has been promoted to
157:Knowledge (XXG):Picture peer review/Upernavik
8:
1138:File:Mavericks and surfer 4 frames image.jpg
2015:Just to let you know, the Featured Picture
1955:Just to let you know, the Featured Picture
1915:Just to let you know, the Featured Picture
1875:Just to let you know, the Featured Picture
1843:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1839:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1748:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1744:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1694:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1690:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1640:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1636:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1407:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1403:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
698:. Please feel free to nominate an image at
363:. I have put up a discussion at PPR talk -
292:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
288:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
136:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
132:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1465:
1097:File:Spectators are watching Mavericks.jpg
321:Image:Upernavik evening panorama edit4.jpg
283:Image:Upernavik evening panorama edit4.jpg
1917:File:Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg
1834:File:Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg
648:
641:Knowledge (XXG) announces launch of new
159:. Have a look and see what you think. --
1217:or are you just asking for my oponion?
729:project. You are working very fast. --
1370:Successful featured picture nomination
529:
1476:A picture that you uploaded entitled
7:
1845:. Thank you for your contribution!
1750:. Thank you for your contribution!
1696:. Thank you for your contribution!
1642:. Thank you for your contribution!
1409:. Thank you for your contribution!
861:Image:Fata morgana of the ships.jpg
294:. Thank you for your contribution!
138:. Thank you for your contribution!
177:and you'll find my email address.
14:
1770:
1550:is due to make an appearance as
1469:
1150:File:Mavericks wave breaks 4.jpg
1051:File:Maverick's spectators 2.jpg
1047:File:Maverick's spectators 1.jpg
610:is due to make an appearance as
530:
323:is due to make an appearance as
19:
67:and the shape suggests a mite.
1059:File:Mavericks wave breaks.jpg
865:California Academy of Sciences
1:
1755:15:40, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
1437:WP:Reference Desk/Mathematics
1365:21:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
1328:17:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
1313:10:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
1300:15:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
1286:07:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
1268:22:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
1249:23:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1196:15:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1177:14:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1162:22:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
1146:File:Surfers at Mavericks.jpg
1142:File:Mavericks and surfer.jpg
1132:21:45, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
1117:06:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
1107:of what happened yesterday.--
1090:21:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
1071:00:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
1035:06:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
879:13:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
855:13:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
839:19:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
2033:01:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
1796:08:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
1595:20:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
1576:20:36, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
1524:23:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1502:07:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1003:15:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
984:11:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
967:10:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
953:23:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
938:00:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
809:21:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
795:19:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
779:18:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
761:18:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
739:18:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
719:17:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
636:22:43, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
569:(who has now retired) which
155:Hey. Have posted an edit at
91:08:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
80:11:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
58:07:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1992:21:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
1973:11:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
1933:23:37, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
1701:02:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
2048:
1763:2014 Year In Review Awards
910:06:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
224:15:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
202:10:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
187:01:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
169:11:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
143:12:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
1893:15:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
1850:07:07, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
1776:
1769:
1647:09:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
1422:07:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
680:Valued picture candidates
536:
349:23:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
2021:Template:POTD/2016-12-21
1987:
1961:Template:POTD/2016-10-22
1921:Template:POTD/2016-09-09
1881:Template:POTD/2016-08-04
1780:The WikiProject Barnstar
1590:
1556:Template:POTD/2011-10-17
1457:00:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
1360:
1281:
1263:
1172:
1127:
1085:
850:
804:
774:
734:
616:Template:POTD/2008-10-24
583:20:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
578:
556:16:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
523:16:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
494:23:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
489:
463:09:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
436:20:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
431:
414:14:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
392:19:29, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
387:
377:17:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
354:Valued Pictures Proposal
329:Template:POTD/2008-06-21
299:06:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
240:
197:
63:Mm, it is definitely an
53:some mention somewhere!
1488:Portal Renewable energy
1231:File:Ross ice shelf.jpg
1205:, when I stayed there,
694:project has opened for
245:20:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
30:project has opened for
2009:
1949:
1909:
1869:
1818:
1723:
1669:
1615:
1540:
1382:
1017:
924:
654:
600:
313:
267:
111:
26:The Mediawiki Commons
2005:
1945:
1905:
1865:
1817:
1722:
1668:
1614:
1536:
1381:
1015:
922:
893:Litoria subglandulosa
662:This Knowledge (XXG)
652:
596:
309:
266:
110:
1516:Simpsons contributor
1027:Simpsons contributor
1023:Teddy bear Julia set
995:Simpsons contributor
976:Simpsons contributor
959:Simpsons contributor
945:Simpsons contributor
930:Simpsons contributor
690:The Knowledge (XXG)
653:The official VP seal
1837:, was nominated on
1742:, was nominated on
1688:, was nominated on
1634:, was nominated on
1401:, was nominated on
1306:Commons:SlaungerBot
915:New Mandelbrot zoom
673:Picture peer review
361:User:Jjron/VP Trial
286:, was nominated on
130:, was nominated on
2010:
1950:
1910:
1870:
1819:
1724:
1670:
1616:
1552:Picture of the Day
1541:
1383:
1055:it was much better
1018:
925:
655:
612:Picture of the Day
601:
325:Picture of the Day
314:
268:
112:
1998:POTD notification
1938:POTD notification
1898:POTD notification
1858:POTD notification
1855:
1854:
1801:
1800:
1760:
1759:
1706:
1705:
1652:
1651:
1573:
1529:POTD notification
1507:
1506:
1427:
1426:
793:
759:
717:
706:
705:
669:Featured pictures
633:
589:POTD notification
561:
560:
346:
304:
303:
148:
147:
38:
37:
2039:
1826:featured picture
1810:
1774:
1767:
1766:
1731:featured picture
1715:
1677:featured picture
1661:
1623:featured picture
1607:
1574:
1567:
1564:
1484:Selected Picture
1473:
1466:
1452:
1445:
1417:
1414:
1390:featured picture
1374:
1274:no hard feelings
787:
753:
711:
685:
634:
627:
624:
534:
527:
526:
347:
340:
337:
275:featured picture
259:
175:Go to my website
119:featured picture
103:
23:
16:
2047:
2046:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2000:
1940:
1900:
1860:
1830:
1808:
1765:
1735:
1713:
1681:
1659:
1627:
1605:
1562:
1559:
1531:
1512:
1464:
1450:
1441:
1432:
1430:Reference Desks
1415:
1412:
1394:
1372:
1042:
923:New large zoom.
917:
895:
825:
664:Valued pictures
660:
647:
643:Valued pictures
622:
619:
591:
510:
356:
335:
332:
279:
257:
153:
123:
101:
43:
12:
11:
5:
2045:
2043:
2025:Chris Woodrich
1999:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1980:Chris Woodrich
1965:Chris Woodrich
1939:
1936:
1925:Chris Woodrich
1899:
1896:
1885:Chris Woodrich
1859:
1856:
1853:
1852:
1822:
1820:
1807:
1802:
1799:
1798:
1783:
1782:
1777:
1775:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1727:
1725:
1712:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1673:
1671:
1658:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1619:
1617:
1604:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1530:
1527:
1511:
1508:
1505:
1504:
1491:
1474:
1463:
1460:
1431:
1428:
1425:
1424:
1386:
1384:
1371:
1368:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1270:
1237:
1234:
1227:Ross Ice Shelf
1214:
1207:de:Fram (2007)
1077:
1041:
1038:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
972:
971:
970:
969:
916:
913:
894:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
868:
828:
824:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
790:Ici pour humor
756:Ici pour humor
721:
714:Ici pour humor
704:
703:
692:valued picture
688:
659:
656:
646:
639:
590:
587:
586:
585:
559:
558:
543:
542:
540:Civility Award
537:
535:
509:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
419:
418:
417:
416:
395:
394:
355:
352:
302:
301:
271:
269:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
229:
228:
227:
226:
205:
204:
152:
151:Upernavik edit
149:
146:
145:
115:
113:
100:
95:
94:
93:
88:Richard Barlow
83:
82:
77:Richard Barlow
55:Richard Barlow
42:
39:
36:
35:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2044:
2035:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2013:
2012:Hi Slaugner,
2008:
2004:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1953:
1952:Hi Slaunger,
1948:
1944:
1937:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1913:
1912:Hi Slaugner,
1908:
1904:
1897:
1895:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1873:
1872:Hi Slaunger,
1868:
1864:
1857:
1851:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1835:
1829:
1827:
1821:
1816:
1812:
1811:
1806:
1803:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1762:
1756:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1740:
1734:
1732:
1726:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1711:
1708:
1702:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1686:
1680:
1678:
1672:
1667:
1663:
1662:
1657:
1654:
1648:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1626:
1624:
1618:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1603:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1571:
1566:
1565:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1544:
1543:Hi Slaunger,
1539:
1535:
1528:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1509:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1489:
1485:
1482:has became a
1481:
1480:
1475:
1472:
1468:
1467:
1461:
1459:
1458:
1455:
1453:
1446:
1444:
1438:
1429:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1393:
1391:
1385:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1369:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1235:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1211:de:Ocean Nova
1208:
1204:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1039:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1014:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
981:
977:
968:
964:
960:
956:
955:
954:
950:
946:
942:
941:
940:
939:
935:
931:
921:
914:
912:
911:
907:
903:
898:
892:
882:
881:
880:
876:
872:
866:
862:
858:
857:
856:
852:
848:
843:
842:
841:
840:
836:
832:
822:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:
796:
792:
791:
786:
782:
781:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
763:
762:
758:
757:
752:
747:
742:
741:
740:
736:
732:
727:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
715:
710:
701:
697:
693:
689:
687:
686:
683:
681:
678:Please visit
676:
674:
670:
665:
657:
651:
644:
640:
638:
637:
631:
626:
625:
617:
613:
609:
604:
599:
595:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
563:
562:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:
541:
538:
533:
528:
525:
524:
520:
516:
507:
495:
491:
487:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
464:
460:
456:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
437:
433:
429:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
353:
351:
350:
344:
339:
338:
330:
326:
322:
317:
316:Hi Slaunger,
312:
308:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
278:
276:
270:
265:
261:
260:
255:
252:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
208:
207:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
184:
180:
176:
171:
170:
166:
162:
158:
150:
144:
141:
137:
133:
129:
128:
122:
120:
114:
109:
105:
104:
99:
96:
92:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
61:
60:
59:
56:
51:
46:
40:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2014:
2011:
1954:
1951:
1914:
1911:
1874:
1871:
1832:
1831:Your image,
1823:
1779:
1737:
1736:Your image,
1728:
1683:
1682:Your image,
1674:
1629:
1628:Your image,
1620:
1583:Talk:Naajaat
1560:
1545:
1542:
1513:
1483:
1477:
1447:
1442:
1433:
1411:
1396:
1395:Your image,
1387:
1354:
1273:
1043:
1019:
973:
926:
899:
896:
826:
789:
766:
755:
722:
713:
707:
677:
661:
620:
605:
602:
539:
511:
357:
333:
318:
315:
281:
280:Your image,
272:
214:or similar.
172:
154:
125:
124:Your image,
116:
49:
47:
44:
28:valued image
1310:SlaungerBot
902:liquidGhoul
696:nominations
571:saddened me
508:Hello again
32:nominations
897:Hey mate,
746:LadyofHats
675:projects.
548:Matt Deres
515:Matt Deres
73:harvestmen
1788:TomStar81
1276:-like. --
1203:Upernavik
1105:the video
1040:Mavericks
785:Elucidate
751:Elucidate
709:Elucidate
402:re naming
212:Yousendit
50:Stellaria
1984:Slaunger
1978:Thanks,
1847:Armbrust
1752:Armbrust
1698:Armbrust
1644:Armbrust
1587:Slaunger
1563:howcheng
1510:Featured
1357:Slaunger
1278:Slaunger
1260:Slaunger
1169:Slaunger
1124:Slaunger
1082:Slaunger
1076:Hi mila,
847:Slaunger
801:Slaunger
771:Slaunger
731:Slaunger
623:howcheng
575:Slaunger
486:Slaunger
428:Slaunger
384:Slaunger
336:howcheng
237:Slaunger
194:Slaunger
65:arachnid
1486:on the
1443:Dolphin
1025:too! --
827:Hi Kim,
702:today!
645:project
69:Spiders
1828:status
1733:status
1679:status
1625:status
1494:Elekhh
1392:status
823:Mirage
767:really
700:WP:VPC
277:status
216:Mfield
179:Mfield
121:status
1982:. --
455:jjron
406:jjron
369:jjron
296:MER-C
161:jjron
140:MER-C
2029:talk
2007:POTD
1988:talk
1969:talk
1947:POTD
1929:talk
1907:POTD
1889:talk
1867:POTD
1792:Talk
1591:talk
1585:. --
1570:chat
1538:POTD
1520:talk
1498:talk
1361:talk
1324:talk
1320:Mbz1
1296:talk
1292:Mbz1
1282:talk
1264:talk
1258:? --
1245:talk
1241:Mbz1
1209:and
1192:talk
1188:Mbz1
1173:talk
1158:talk
1154:Mbz1
1128:talk
1113:talk
1109:Mbz1
1086:talk
1067:talk
1063:Mbz1
1031:talk
999:talk
980:talk
963:talk
949:talk
934:talk
906:talk
875:talk
871:Mbz1
851:talk
835:talk
831:Mbz1
805:talk
775:talk
735:talk
671:and
630:chat
603:Hi,
598:POTD
579:talk
552:talk
519:talk
490:talk
459:talk
432:talk
410:talk
388:talk
373:talk
343:chat
311:POTD
241:talk
220:talk
198:talk
183:talk
165:talk
41:Mite
1558:.
1416:din
1413:Mae
618:.
331:.
45:Hi
2031:)
1990:)
1971:)
1931:)
1891:)
1794:)
1593:)
1522:)
1500:)
1420:\
1363:)
1326:)
1318:--
1298:)
1284:)
1266:)
1247:)
1194:)
1175:)
1160:)
1130:)
1122:--
1115:)
1088:)
1069:)
1049:,
1033:)
1001:)
982:)
965:)
951:)
936:)
928:--
908:)
877:)
853:)
837:)
807:)
777:)
737:)
581:)
554:)
521:)
492:)
461:)
453:--
434:)
412:)
390:)
375:)
243:)
222:)
200:)
185:)
167:)
34:!
2027:(
1986:(
1967:(
1927:(
1887:(
1790:(
1589:(
1572:}
1568:{
1518:(
1496:(
1490:.
1454:)
1451:t
1448:(
1359:(
1322:(
1294:(
1280:(
1262:(
1243:(
1190:(
1171:(
1156:(
1126:(
1111:(
1084:(
1065:(
1029:(
997:(
978:(
961:(
947:(
932:(
904:(
873:(
849:(
833:(
803:(
773:(
733:(
632:}
628:{
577:(
550:(
517:(
488:(
457:(
430:(
408:(
386:(
371:(
345:}
341:{
239:(
218:(
196:(
181:(
163:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
