55:
thank you so much for the improvements. At the time, I was writing a paper on marginal utility and wasn't sure if I understood it completely, so I looked to wikipedia for some help... obviously I was dissapointed. Had this version of the article been there then, I'm sure it would've helped me a lot.
154:
Well, according to policy, as long as the sources are from books that are not self-published by the authors or from articles that were published in journals, they they can't reject them. If they delete sourced information, it's considered disruptive and vandalistic. If something is not sourced,
191:
If you want to persuade iNic to change his style, please find a more productive way of doing it. Wading in with template "final warnings" is heavy-handed in the extreme, especially when you are heavily involved in the article concerned. You could try dialogue or you could try
140:
The history section has lots of explicit referencing, so I assume that your concern is for the earlier section. I could put sourcing thereĂŻn, but a problem would be that those same foes could reject any of the potential sources.
219:. ;-) In any event, as a practical matter I will consider dispute resolution, but he plainly was willing to damage the article simply to achieve some sort of personal triumph. —
130:
By the way, if you could provide sources that would be great, otherwise the information is eventually going to be deleted by someone who doesn't like what it says.
59:
86:
article. I'm glad someone finally showed up who understands it more thoroughly than me and others. You may want to improve the
71:
39:
29:
294:
He subsequently defended his deletion of this appropriate content based on the assertion that he would thereby motivate
288:
This came after he had failed in that discussion to show that the point in question could be dismissed as mistaken.
95:
156:
131:
103:
254:
91:
63:
17:
67:
113:
99:
83:
49:
172:
Yeah, I don't deny your point. It's just that there's a limit to what can be done here. —
193:
327:
304:
220:
173:
142:
121:
204:
198:
330:
307:
223:
209:
176:
159:
145:
134:
124:
106:
75:
300:(I had two or three times invited him to flesh-out the point to his satisfaction.
117:
87:
323:
250:
234:
155:
according to policy, anyone is free to delete it. And believe me they will.
245:. Willfully damaging an article is vandalism, plain-and-simple.
316:
iNic summoned you after seeing that you'd previously blocked me.
260:
on the ground that the edit had been incorrect, but with the
319:
315:
301:
293:
261:
238:
230:
120:
article. I may deal with some of the others later. —
102:
articles may be of interest. Thanks for your efforts.
274:discussion that had taken place on the talk page
215:It may be heavy-handed, but surely not in the
8:
237:willfully damaged the article — albeït with
298:to rewrite the article to his satisfaction.
283:over-difficult (perhaps impossible) demand.
239:the pretext that he would thereby motivate
112:Thanks. After I've done some more work on
25:
279:In other words, he attempted to impose a
270:have the full conceptual content of the
243:to rewrite a passage to his satisfaction
264:that any such edit must simultaneously
320:you justified that block with a claim.
38:Some earlier messages may be found in
231:Calling my warning to iNic “bullshit”
7:
233:was coarse and otherwise uncivil.
24:
196:. That might actually work :-)
1:
331:04:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
308:03:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
224:03:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
76:03:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
318:Quite something, given that
210:10:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
177:02:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
160:01:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
146:01:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
135:01:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
125:01:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
107:01:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
347:
96:subjective theory of value
116:, I plan to tackle the
255:St. Petersburg paradox
90:article too. Also the
92:labor theory of value
62:comment was added by
314:I further note that
253:deleted my edit to
18:User talk:SlamDiego
324:demonstrably false
194:dispute resolution
157:Anarcho-capitalism
132:Anarcho-capitalism
104:Anarcho-capitalism
40:the first orc hive
208:
79:
46:
45:
338:
202:
100:paradox of value
84:marginal utility
82:Good job on the
57:
50:Marginal utility
26:
346:
345:
341:
340:
339:
337:
336:
335:
189:
58:—The preceding
53:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
344:
342:
334:
333:
311:
310:
290:
289:
285:
284:
277:
276:
275:
268:
247:
246:
227:
226:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
165:
164:
163:
162:
149:
148:
128:
127:
52:
47:
44:
43:
35:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
343:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
309:
306:
302:
299:
297:
292:
291:
287:
286:
282:
281:transparently
278:
273:
269:
266:
265:
263:
259:
256:
252:
249:
248:
244:
242:
236:
232:
229:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
206:
201:
200:
195:
186:
178:
175:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
161:
158:
153:
152:
151:
150:
147:
144:
139:
138:
137:
136:
133:
126:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
109:
108:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
80:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
51:
48:
41:
37:
36:
33:
32:
28:
27:
19:
295:
280:
271:
257:
240:
216:
197:
190:
129:
114:that article
81:
54:
30:
118:Marginalism
88:marginalism
328:SlamDiego
322:that was
305:SlamDiego
221:SlamDiego
174:SlamDiego
143:SlamDiego
122:SlamDiego
267:be brief
72:contribs
64:Xiaoxitu
60:unsigned
31:Orc Hive
272:lengthy
217:extreme
262:demand
98:, and
205:Help!
16:<
251:iNic
235:iNic
187:iNic
68:talk
303:) —
258:not
199:Guy
296:me
241:me
94:,
74:)
70:•
42:.
326:—
207:)
203:(
141:—
78:.
66:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.