27:
53:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
57:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
50:
39:
81:, which you seem to have taken for a blocked sock's contributions. If you have concerns about this text, please discuss your proposed changes. Thanks.
43:
34:
18:
86:
63:
82:
59:
90:
67:
78:
77:
Hi-- I've restored the long-standing version of the lead at
38:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) according to
32:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
51:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/John
Cagnetta
8:
40:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
7:
14:
49:The article will be discussed at
25:
1:
91:05:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
68:22:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
106:
42:or whether it should be
97:
29:
28:
105:
104:
100:
99:
98:
96:
95:
94:
75:
30:
26:
23:
12:
11:
5:
103:
101:
74:
71:
24:
22:
17:Nomination of
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
102:
93:
92:
88:
84:
80:
72:
70:
69:
65:
61:
55:
52:
47:
45:
41:
37:
36:
35:John Cagnetta
20:
19:John Cagnetta
16:
76:
56:
48:
33:
31:
21:for deletion
83:Eperoton
60:Bahooka
44:deleted
79:Hijab
73:Hijab
87:talk
64:talk
89:)
66:)
46:.
85:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.