Knowledge

User talk:Snapper2/Archive 2

Source šŸ“

1810:
he used that Butterfly technique to kill him, dude that shit is not minor, it is a important ability and it is one of his techniques. Also when Kiba was fighting Ukan and Akan, he used that replacement jutsu to make his dog a bomb filled with knives. How is the other stuff minor too? It still doesn't make any sense why you keep deleating this stuff just because it is from anwsers.com, all this stuff I put is good info and they used it in some times more than others.
31: 1482:, the sub-page for the bigger teams, minor villians and allies, the tailed beasts and summons, and the country topics, we should move the characters to List of Naruto characters and the other info to the Naruto world topic. If the characters themselves become targets, then they should result in the same should merge be inevitable. Team 7, however, has too much info and has too much potential to be ridded that easily. 1837: 1199:. I immediately reverted his edit and gave him a warning about refactoring the other editors comments. If he deletes or edits comments which he didn't make, undo the edit and give him a warning. But if you're unsure about which warning to use or, for your own reasons, you don't what to get caught up in his edits, leave me a message on my talk page and I can take the appropriate action. 1041:. About a week more before I get rid of them, they look false afterall. You said you had access to databook scanlations, did you ever see a reference regarding the Third being a damn dog & Kishimoto rejecting it? To me, it sounds bogus (I could not find any official verification online regarding). And how 'bout those Itachi developments? I hope they're available in the scans. 837:
the page references. Since you appear to have at least one of the databooks, can you put the ISBN beside it so I can confirm its the correct book? I trust that you own it, but I need to acquire the number for everyone in the community to conduct the research based on that ISBN. Questions, comments or concerns before I proceed?
954: 885:, I suggest you put that section back. I'm sure I gave good reason, more than one actually. The other pages with refs, like Naruto Uzumaki & Might Guy, have both a sources section and referenced section. Your reason for disagreeing is vague, why didn't you bring it up on the talk page or WP:NARUTO instead? 1809:
Hey Snapper, sorry I called you a retard, I just was pissed off that all my hard work trying to get new info on each ninja's techniques were suddenly deleated. You got to admit, this is good info and they did used these in some cases such as when Choji was fighting the fat guy from the SOund of Four,
1507:
um... ok, wow...... i dont mean to sound like an ass but whats up with the complete rewrite of 666 Satans character page... i mean i understand the removal of some images that are not really needed, but i dont understand completely changing a format that has been working fine since day one... some of
1220:
Well, wait - its body is made out of sand, at least during that arc, right? So when it did the long-arms thing, wouldn't that count as manipulating sand? (I don't want to be facetious by just saying that it moving would be sand manipulation, but it does do the elongation stuff that depend on it being
1538:
origional page was there and its just never really been removed... i guess i think that there should be a different way to do this... i'm gona look into it tonight and see what i can come up with, for now tho i reverted it so its easier to see it... i'll give ya a link or something tonight... peace,
1055:
I have to say that I'm biased because I've uploaded a fair number myself to other articles which I've sunk time into improving, not to mention all the time it takes to look for and find good screenshots or manga scans. I do agree that reduction in use to some degree is warranted, but apparently not
730:
Should we just start ignoring or maybe even removing any more pointless rants by all the angry IPs on talk pages like the Clash of Ninja series one? We have enough as it is, and it seems that as one finally starts to settle down, another starts covering the same exact discussion as the previous one.
1789:
Hey Snapper, its me Johnny. Can I ask you a question? Is it me or does Temari like Shikamura in a way. First of all she did save him from Tayuya in Naruto Episode 125 and he did say that she was scarier than his mom. Though I think they could make a good couple because they both are kind of similar
1607:
i fail to see your reason to insult my abilities as an editor, on top of that my version will be doing actual justice to the article as i can tell that from your edit you do not know much about the series.... so im gonna try to fix up the page that i basically built from scratch to see if i can fix
1250:
Ah...no, I was wrong. Most of them (except Wind Release: Infinite Sand Cloud Great Breakthrough) aren't any kind of release at all. Oh well. I guess I was just taking the Sunagakure/Kazekage connection a bit too close, and I guess I got the idea that Gaara could control the sand because of Shukaku.
1779:
Well. I supposed your right, but it still is possible that she actually does love Yoruichi. There are a couple of lesibians in Bleach like that girl in the glasses that likes Orihime. It says in her Knowledge section that she actually took a picture of Yoruichi when she was naked and that when she
1570:
i have no problem believing that your edit was made in good faith... but what i do not believe is that the decision you made with the article, was the best course, reguardless of what was kept and what was removed... as i said i am working on another variation of what you did and if you could wait
1433:
I am aware of the WP:NOT policy and have in fact quoted it in my above post ("While a talk page isn't a discussion forum..."). However, this does not mean that it's alright to delete other peoples' comments on talk pages as long as they don't violate certain other policies. You can always tell the
1177:
Can you please talk some sense into two of the admins corrupting the Akatsuki members page? They won't ever listen to anyone below admin level like me, so you're the only one they would listen to. If not, what is apparently a scandal will have the members page deleted, not merged, but deleted, and
836:
Adding it with the refs make it look VERY sloppy IMHO, many graphic novel volumes are repeated save for the different chapters and pages within. I'm going to re-add the section you removed (thinking about renaming it "Bibliography") for consistency with the other characters that have it along with
641:
Why was the Shino, Ino, and Tenten pages deleted? I looked at the history and you where the ones that added them on the Long Lists. Did you delete them and if so when was this discussed because I haven't found it anywhere. EDIT: I see, you where the one. Alright now that thats out of the way, how
1712:
I volunteered to dig up some more information on their reception in Japanese; unfortunately, all I could find was a bunch of personal opinions on blogs, which are not admissible as a wiki source. I think if there are any articles on their reception, it might be in something like the JP version of
1422:
While a talk page isn't a discussion forum, and it's generally not good practice to speculate on talk pages, users are still free to do so and there's no reasons to delete their comments. If the talk page gets too big, it can be archived, so that's not a problem. Only clear vandalism and nonsense
856:
I'm going to place back the sources section to Itachi Uchiha, along with any other referenced page. I'll look for the ISBNs online, may not be so easy to find but bear with me. Since I've stated my reason for doing this and yours is vague, please bring it up on the talk page or ask about it at
126:
Most of the list of remaining jutsu have been incorporated. The only ones I haven't touched are the summoning ones you said you would deal with and the ones with multiple users. For the ones with multiple users, I would place it it with the more major character, or if this is not possible, the
1769:
Hey I was wondering is Soi really a lesbian or just admires Yoruichi as a sister or something like that because in pictures all I ever see of her is her trying to make out with Yoriuchi which is hot as hell. Also in all the talk pages in youtube, they keep saying that she is a lesbian. She is
239:
Dammit, now I'm having second thoughts. Though Zabuza is a notorious assassin, he is just as acclaimed as Itachi for slaughtering an abundance of people. Er, is that sort of correct? You mind if I re-add Zabuza to the mass murderer cat.? I know how you feel about these trivial matters, but...
1537:
i am not saying that the page doesnt have problems, i understand it does... but i think theres a better way to go about this instead of removing so much of the article as it appears to be when you look at the edit summary... i think that some of the o-part things were left over from when the
1407:
That article has a peer review, and that "Please rewrite this article to explain the fiction more clearly and provide non-fictional perspective". Also I wanted to point that although sasuke lacks hatred, Itachi Article lacks personality (Worst joke ever...). The discussion page is a hell od
1790:
and also they are seen togther in the second Naruto series and even though they say they are not on a date, they might actually be lying and might go out in later episodes. EIther that or they are just friends. What do you think? Also are there any new episodes of the second Naruto series?
294:-related pages too. Still, there are too many obsessed "fanboys" that want the merged DB pages back and Son Goku's name changed to Goku or Goku (Dragon Ball), Kuririn moved to Krillin, and others. Do I need someone's permission for starting that portal or can I just start it on my own? 1780:
was on a date with that guy, she got jealous. Either this is like you said a very deep admiration of her or that in fact that she is a lesibian. I have no problem with this since it is so sexy, hot and funny how the way lesibians try to go after other girls, I mean the hot lesibians.
111:
Given the mass amounts of vandalism and utterly random video game jutsu that are dumped on that page, could we move the relevant jutsu and then set an Afd for it? Practically all of it won't be missed, and most of the relevant ones are already in the combined jutsu page in any case.
481:
As I said, I only pay attention to the Naruto Portal in case someone uses it (which they don't). That doesn't mean I see a need for it. As for your problem, you could try actually finding a compromise instead of coming up with an alternative that won't solve the problem at hand.
846:
Bizarre, how did you know that Might Guy reference if you do not own a databook? In any case, that's not a bad idea regarding that article you appointed me to. I know ISBNs aren't required upon a rule, just its not a bad idea. I'll get back on this matter later when I return.
1675:
so out of curiosity, what is with your apperant vendetta against 666 Satan as of late, i mean i've noticed you've made some major edits to a couple of articles on here with out going through the normal channels of discussing major edits in talk pages prior to making them,
1642:
im not even going to argue this anymore, im going to make a different version of this and change it... and if you feel like reverting a page that you'll proboly never come back to unless asked, then be my guess... but let me just say its a fairly dick move.......
1231:
I remember the arm, and certainly the shell around Sakura. I'm not going to make an argument out of it, because being anal retentive isn't my thing, but isn't sand control a type of "wind jutsu" - so wouldn't being able to control wind indicate further control of
1492:
This does seem rash, but it is the truth: eventually we won't be able to doge a merger anymore, and such a precaution will need to be taken. I'm only here to warn you and to give you my suggestion, however. You're free to make up you're own should you please.
301:
I don't see why you'd need permission to create a portal, though I really know nothing about it; I simply keep it on my Watchlist in case someone discovers and decides to use it. I will say that I see no reason for Dragon Ball to have a Wikiproject
1143:
on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
1349:
True sorry wasn't thinking there I'm planning my weekend right now. Artist is at his conspiracy theories again, saying I called the admins over here to delete stuff, as if I can make them do what I want with a snap of my fingers. ^_^
1799:
Yeah well, your right they must be denying it. Like Asuma and that women, they denyed it until in that one episode when we found out that the women was pregnent with his child. Its only a matter of time before they start to go out.
552:
I don't want my talk page to become the place of debate regarding the structure of Dragon Ball articles and policies. I don't have a problem using it if you want my opinion, though if it's going to become an extension of
1272:
Just in case you'd lost count... you're up to 3 reverts on this article, too. I'm hoping, now that the two worst offenders are blocked for 24 hours, the rest of you can come up with a consensus on the talk page.
1852: 1056:
even the previous versions are good enough. That said, I would rather yank my own uploads from article space myself instead of having a 3rd party do it, it still sucks but doesn't feel as bad that way.
919:
No problem about editing that page it's meant for that. I know what you mean about not being here all day but I have to watch my sister all day so i miss out on just about every party possible. Sad isn't
786:? I'm unable to place "Hojo, Yukino" at the correct alphabetical order without messing the entire thing up. I'm asking your help here since I've seen your edits on these types of pages before. Thanks, 1408:
discussions and I give permission to delete discussions I started. It would be important that in some part of the portal its explaine why some characters dont have their own articles. See you.
1474:
articles if that should happen. Akatsuki is a prime target by others, so we should bein to prepare a move of the character information to Naruto characters and the organization's info to
145:
Honestly, I'm sick of discussing with him. It reminds me of anons at GameFaqs boards who can't spell a word correctly to save their life, yet alone provide a coherent idea. He's violated
93:. It could use a little copyediting to fix some of the language, but that's a moot point. As expected, it's a tad bit too long, but a significant portion can be put under the respective 1383: 1189: 1463:
Well... it seems Naruto has become a prime target of mergings by those who aren't satisfied with Naruto and ignore any potential it has. Not to mention how the chances of us reforming
1078:
that he/she is using to keep track of pages with 10 and over fair use images in use; a bunch of the stuff I'm worked on is there as well. Apparently the threshold is 4, as there's
797:
That was tough to decide: he is a large snake, but not a monster? Can't help but think back to when Kabuto said something (during 4 tailed Naruto and Oro's fight) in the likes of: "
372:
Portals are only helpful if people know they exists. IPs, which seem as though they'd be the only ones interested in the Portal you have in mind, are unlikely to find or use it.
260:
How come Deidara doesn't have his own profile like Itachi and the other ones? I mean We know alot about Deidara, probably just as much of him as Itachi. Also same with Kisame.
1082:
of pages with 5-10 images used. I raised the concept of a threshold (haven't heard back yet) which would help prioritize what regular contributors think should be kept.
522:
It's hard trying to compromise anything when people won't voice their complete thoughts. You feel that nothing is useful, way I see it. Let's see what others have to say.
1571:
i'll have another version of it on a sandbox of mine and you can see if you feel it serves the same purpose or not... would we be able to make some type of deal here???
358:
and the like ā€” which shall use only the dub information. Respond here instead of my talk page, I'm about to invite someone else on this discussion to voice their words.
899:
I meant place that a single ref on the "EX" part of the first row. If you're going to use individual refs for every character, citing the specific page is preferable.
1880:. Most of his changes are good, and should be implemented. Discussion is important to hammer out the details though. Your input would be highly appreciated. Thanks, 657:. Perhaps you could see what else may need to be arranged, maybe added? Those blue colors have to go, orange or yellow is way better. I'm assuming you know about 1195:
I noticed that this user 67.140.54.49 has been causing trouble on this Afd talk page and I thought you should know that he deleted every single comment made.
1467:
in a week, less than that now, is none. But what should we do if there is no way to save the articles? A back-up plan must be decided upon and very quickly.
1387: 1365: 1336: 1311: 935: 699: 861:. Once again, I'm aware that these identification numbers are not required upon any rule, but I'll need it to make sure whether it is the correct book. See 1293: 783: 1494: 1179: 813: 1695: 1662: 1627: 1590: 1557: 1527: 174: 90: 170: 823:
would be added for each databook, guidebook, etc., to check for verifiability. And what you're saying is incoherent for the few other
1485:
The characters article will also seem to get very big eventually if something like this happens. Well, mabye we should do what the
204:
No because techincally 33.3333333333333333333333333ect.% equals a third, not 33%, that equals 99%, unless your rounding of course.
1752: 1095: 1069: 1042: 886: 866: 848: 838: 828: 802: 787: 666: 631: 606: 523: 460: 417: 359: 295: 247: 241: 233: 149:
in any case. Should I report him, or remind him first? I honestly don't think it will stop him, but I'll defer to your judgment.
1735: 1508:
it just seems a bit excessive... just curious as to whats going on in your head so i can beter understand the edits, peace...
1398: 567: 492: 382: 342:
English dubs. It was opposed. How is a portal not useful? It's either that or another project, or separate articles entitled
316: 1148: 1079: 1128: 306:
a Portal. As for the Bleach character introductions, I can't help you any more than I could with the Naruto characters.
76: 71: 59: 1131:, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add 1486: 38: 1848: 1471: 1351: 1322: 1297: 1075: 921: 703: 205: 1730: 1205: 676:
I noticed that you've had it deleted 5 times; just wondering if there's any reason why you don't have one. --
1858:
Another editor started it 2 November and I just noticed that the contributors still needed to be notified. --
662: 1687: 1654: 1619: 1582: 1549: 1519: 1449:
Ha ha ha ha ha! Good addition Snap! Good addition! One Source down! I would give you a star if I knew how!--
862: 187: 755: 732: 268: 261: 1278: 1106: 280: 1178:
that is VERY bad. Please do this, I don't want to see Knowledge go down in flames with this one topic.
1109:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done for the following reason: 858: 720: 1479: 232:
I lefted a few comments on that talk page and hoped you could enlighten me with your thoughts again.
408:-related articles? The pages that I've noticed that are vandalized the most are the ones related to 1851:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1200: 973: 561: 486: 376: 310: 287: 1756: 1882: 1677: 1644: 1609: 1572: 1539: 1509: 1478:, and turn it into one big Naruto world article. If any other articles become such targets, like 1164: 1024: 901: 654: 564: 489: 379: 313: 181: 152: 129: 113: 98: 47: 17: 1755:
Feel free to read before that as well to get a better understanding of everything he's saying.
1464: 1450: 1083: 1057: 999: 977: 677: 643: 139: 1753:
http://groups.msn.com/NarutoMangaReturns/chapter364mq.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=43759
338:. Earlier, I have mentioned at the wikiproject to create a separate wikiproject only for the 1844: 1830: 1475: 1292:
Yeh I saved it can you make that template that the list of akatsuki member had? the link is
1274: 812:
I'm just wondering, but just why doesn't Itachi's article need both references and sources?
1863: 1252: 1242: 1233: 1222: 1136: 290:ā€” that caught my eye; it was extremely interesting and I think a portal may serve for the 1820: 1811: 1801: 1791: 1781: 1771: 1714: 1266: 1160: 1156: 820: 331: 1221:
made out of sand - Kyuubi can't do that, for example (at least, not that we've seen)).
1435: 1424: 1392: 1321:
sorry misunderstood that I guess. Should we speedy them if they haven't been already?
1152: 1147:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
1120: 554: 177:. It provides a more concise list format, and is more bearable to the eye. Comments? 146: 94: 1836: 1890: 1866: 1823: 1814: 1804: 1794: 1784: 1774: 1759: 1742: 1717: 1699: 1666: 1631: 1594: 1561: 1531: 1497: 1453: 1438: 1427: 1412: 1409: 1402: 1369: 1340: 1315: 1282: 1255: 1245: 1236: 1225: 1210: 1182: 1167: 1163:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 1045: 1038: 1027: 1011: 989: 939: 909: 889: 869: 851: 841: 831: 771: 748: 689: 665:; I'll return and respond there tomorrow when I'm well rested with a clearer head. 572: 497: 387: 321: 222: 194: 159: 133: 116: 101: 1489:
did and make several different pages for it, except by A-B-Cs instead of 1-2-3s.
1877: 286:
and thought you may be capable of answering it. And I just recently noticed the
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1241:
What I meant about sand is that, well, isn't every sand jutsu a "wind release"?
1860: 1819:
Yeah that will work, try to make the info I put smaller at least next time.
1129:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article
953: 782:
Hey Snapper, do you think you can correct the last character listed at
451: 443: 355: 347: 1434:
original poster that Knowledge talk pages aren't a message board. --
969: 447: 351: 246:
And Sasori? We've gone over this, but just to be on the safe side.
1853:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Naruto geography (2nd nomination)
1470:
Well, mabye we should begin to move the characters back into the
439: 343: 863:
Knowledge:Verifiability#Sources_in_languages_other_than_English
25: 968:
For the consistent and steadfast defense of the integrity of
1835: 1127:
basic Knowledge criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
1050: 827:
character pages have the sources section plus actual refs.
1459:
It looks like Naruto is a prime target by other editors...
754:
Alright, I'll keep that in mind in the future. Thanks. //
454:
and the like which of course will use the English dub info
1386:
you participated in has been brought to deletion review
1190:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Akatsuki members
1196: 882: 627: 972:
articles, I am pleased to confer this BarnSakura upon
1770:
probably and if she is, that would be sexy as hell.
173:
as a possible alternative to the jutsu list present
1843:An article that you have been involved in editing, 605:Oh, thought you didn't mind. Hang on, I'll fix it. 1713:Newtype, which I do not have a subscription to... 1051:What's your take on the fair use image elimination 422:Which of the three would you find most effective: 819:I'd disagree, the sources section should stay so 1037:I plan to delete those unsourced statements off 557:I'd prefer you moved this discussion elsewhere. 799:Shall I say this is a battle between monsters?' 169:In the latest stretch of ideas, I've developed 1390:. Please take a look if you're interested. ā€” 1251:Do you know how he can control the sand then? 8: 334:already. Actually, its a taskforce now like 642:about we have ourselves some negotiations? 404:Does that not apply for the ips that go to 661:enough to assist, correct? Please comment 416:. Why this is so, I don't know. Thoughts? 951: 267:Oh, I'm sorry, then. I see you're point. 127:character first seen using it. Thoughts? 89:I've finished combining the jutsu lists 1423:should be removed from talk pages. -- 814:User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 962:The Manga and Anime BarnSakura Award 1608:it up so it meets your standards, 24: 1708:Third-party reception of Akatsuki 1495:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 1180:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 438:As said above, articles entitled 1727:of the "Chicken Sharingan" lol-- 998:Where are you going to put it? 952: 694: 29: 945:I think one of these is overdue 895:Naruto: Clash of Ninja (series) 429:WikiProject using just dub info 1700:05:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1667:04:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1632:04:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1595:04:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1562:03:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1532:03:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 777: 672:Your user page or lack thereof 1: 1891:02:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1498:20:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 1454:18:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 1439:18:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 1428:17:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 1403:19:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 726:Naruto game series talk pages 107:The other media ninjutsu page 1867:19:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 1824:12:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 1815:12:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 1805:12:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 1795:20:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC) 1785:12:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1775:21:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 1760:23:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 1413:12:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 1384:List of Akatsuki members AfD 1197:See here for page difference 1123:, articles that do not meet 1121:criteria for speedy deletion 1872:Rather important discussion 1743:03:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1718:02:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 1370:22:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 1341:20:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 1316:01:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 1283:22:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 1256:04:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 1246:04:25, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 1237:04:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 1226:03:56, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 1211:20:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 1183:20:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 1168:21:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 1096:22:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1070:21:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1046:04:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1028:22:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1012:20:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 990:20:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 940:00:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1906: 1023:Those guys with Zabuza. - 910:05:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 890:20:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 870:14:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 852:21:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 842:21:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 832:20:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1472:List of Naruto characters 1105:A tag has been placed on 958: 772:16:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 749:14:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 721:03:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 690:19:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 573:20:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 498:19:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 388:19:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 322:19:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 223:04:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 195:07:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 1378:List of Akatsuki members 160:02:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 134:18:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 279:I posted a question at 117:05:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 102:00:59, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 1847:, has been listed for 1840: 1288:Tobi is Madara archive 1839: 1021:The "Demon Brothers". 700:I'm on Editor Review! 42:of past discussions. 1480:List of Konoha ninja 1114:Copyright violation. 778:Can't get this right 695:I'm on Editor Review 1445:Re:+Out of Universe 1107:Image:NarutoMap.gif 801:What do you think? 122:Incorporating jutsu 1841: 1829:AfD nomination of 650:Dragon Ball portal 283:Weekly Shonen Jump 281:Someguy regarding 18:User talk:Snapper2 1740: 1465:Akatsuki (Naruto) 995: 994: 140:User talk:Iorinyc 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1897: 1889: 1887: 1865: 1845:Naruto geography 1831:Naruto geography 1738: 1733: 1729: 1698: 1693: 1690: 1681: 1665: 1660: 1657: 1648: 1630: 1625: 1622: 1613: 1593: 1588: 1585: 1576: 1560: 1555: 1552: 1543: 1530: 1525: 1522: 1513: 1476:Naruto geography 1395: 1368: 1361: 1358: 1354: 1339: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1314: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1208: 1203: 1142: 1141: 1135: 1093: 1088: 1067: 1062: 1009: 1004: 987: 982: 956: 949: 948: 938: 931: 928: 924: 908: 906: 769: 762: 746: 739: 718: 715: 712: 709: 706: 687: 682: 655:It has been done 646:-June 24 9:27AM 288:portal of Naruto 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 193: 192: 165:A different take 158: 155: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1883: 1881: 1874: 1859: 1834: 1767: 1750: 1736: 1731: 1725: 1710: 1694: 1688: 1685: 1679: 1661: 1655: 1652: 1646: 1626: 1620: 1617: 1611: 1589: 1583: 1580: 1574: 1556: 1550: 1547: 1541: 1526: 1520: 1517: 1511: 1505: 1461: 1447: 1420: 1401: 1391: 1380: 1364: 1359: 1356: 1352: 1335: 1330: 1327: 1323: 1310: 1305: 1302: 1298: 1290: 1270: 1218: 1206: 1202:AngelOfSadness 1201: 1193: 1175: 1149:for biographies 1139: 1133: 1132: 1117: 1103: 1089: 1084: 1063: 1058: 1053: 1043:Lord Sesshomaru 1035: 1019: 1005: 1000: 983: 978: 947: 934: 929: 926: 922: 917: 902: 900: 897: 887:Lord Sesshomaru 867:Lord Sesshomaru 849:Lord Sesshomaru 839:Lord Sesshomaru 829:Lord Sesshomaru 810: 803:Lord Sesshomaru 795: 788:Lord Sesshomaru 780: 763: 756: 740: 733: 728: 716: 713: 710: 707: 704: 697: 683: 678: 674: 667:Lord Sesshomaru 652: 639: 632:Lord Sesshomaru 607:Lord Sesshomaru 524:Lord Sesshomaru 461:Lord Sesshomaru 418:Lord Sesshomaru 360:Lord Sesshomaru 296:Lord Sesshomaru 277: 258: 248:Lord Sesshomaru 242:Lord Sesshomaru 234:Lord Sesshomaru 230: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 202: 179: 178: 167: 153: 150: 143: 124: 109: 87: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1903: 1901: 1873: 1870: 1833: 1827: 1766: 1763: 1749: 1746: 1724: 1721: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1670: 1669: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1565: 1564: 1504: 1501: 1460: 1457: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1419: 1416: 1397: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1344: 1343: 1289: 1286: 1269: 1267:Naruto Uzumaki 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1217: 1214: 1192: 1186: 1174: 1171: 1111: 1102: 1099: 1052: 1049: 1034: 1031: 1022: 1018: 1015: 997: 993: 992: 965: 964: 959: 957: 946: 943: 916: 913: 896: 893: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 809: 806: 794: 791: 779: 776: 775: 774: 727: 724: 696: 693: 673: 670: 651: 648: 638: 635: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 457: 456: 455: 436: 430: 420: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 365: 364: 363: 362: 325: 324: 276: 273: 272: 271: 269:Akuba Ketsueki 262:Akuba Ketsueki 257: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 229: 226: 201: 198: 166: 163: 142: 137: 123: 120: 108: 105: 97:or character. 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1902: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1886: 1885:Sephiroth BCR 1879: 1871: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1862: 1856: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1838: 1832: 1828: 1826: 1825: 1822: 1817: 1816: 1813: 1807: 1806: 1803: 1797: 1796: 1793: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1754: 1747: 1745: 1744: 1741: 1739: 1734: 1722: 1720: 1719: 1716: 1707: 1701: 1697: 1696:Editor Review 1692: 1691: 1683: 1682: 1680:Ancientanubis 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1668: 1664: 1663:Editor Review 1659: 1658: 1650: 1649: 1647:Ancientanubis 1641: 1640: 1633: 1629: 1628:Editor Review 1624: 1623: 1615: 1614: 1612:Ancientanubis 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1596: 1592: 1591:Editor Review 1587: 1586: 1578: 1577: 1575:Ancientanubis 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1558:Editor Review 1554: 1553: 1545: 1544: 1542:Ancientanubis 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1528:Editor Review 1524: 1523: 1515: 1514: 1512:Ancientanubis 1502: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1490: 1488: 1483: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1468: 1466: 1458: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1444: 1440: 1437: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1426: 1417: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1394: 1389: 1385: 1377: 1371: 1367: 1366:Editor Review 1362: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1338: 1337:Editor Review 1333: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1312:Editor Review 1308: 1295: 1287: 1285: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1268: 1265: 1257: 1254: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1215: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1204: 1198: 1191: 1187: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1172: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1165:Papa November 1162: 1161:for companies 1158: 1154: 1153:for web sites 1150: 1145: 1138: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1115: 1110: 1108: 1100: 1098: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1087: 1081: 1077: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1061: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1032: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1025:Access Timeco 1016: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1003: 991: 988: 986: 981: 975: 971: 967: 966: 963: 960: 955: 950: 944: 942: 941: 937: 936:Editor Review 932: 914: 912: 911: 907: 905: 904:Sephiroth BCR 894: 892: 891: 888: 884: 871: 868: 864: 860: 855: 854: 853: 850: 845: 844: 843: 840: 835: 834: 833: 830: 826: 822: 818: 817: 816: 815: 808:Itachi Uchiha 807: 805: 804: 800: 792: 790: 789: 785: 773: 770: 768: 767: 761: 760: 753: 752: 751: 750: 747: 745: 744: 738: 737: 725: 723: 722: 719: 701: 692: 691: 688: 686: 681: 671: 669: 668: 664: 660: 656: 649: 647: 645: 636: 634: 633: 629: 608: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 574: 571: 570: 569: 566: 563: 556: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 525: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 499: 496: 495: 494: 491: 488: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 462: 458: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 435: 432:A portal for 431: 428: 424: 423: 421: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 389: 386: 385: 384: 381: 378: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 332:a wikiproject 329: 328: 327: 326: 323: 320: 319: 318: 315: 312: 305: 300: 299: 298: 297: 293: 289: 285: 284: 274: 270: 266: 265: 264: 263: 255: 249: 245: 244: 243: 238: 237: 236: 235: 228:Itachi Uchiha 227: 225: 224: 221: 200:33% = a third 199: 197: 196: 191: 189: 184: 183: 182:Sephiroth BCR 176: 172: 164: 162: 161: 157: 156: 154:Sephiroth BCR 148: 141: 138: 136: 135: 132: 131: 130:Sephiroth BCR 121: 119: 118: 115: 114:Sephiroth BCR 106: 104: 103: 100: 99:Sephiroth BCR 96: 95:kekkei genkai 92: 84: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1884: 1875: 1857: 1842: 1818: 1808: 1798: 1788: 1778: 1768: 1751: 1728: 1726: 1711: 1686: 1678: 1653: 1645: 1618: 1610: 1581: 1573: 1548: 1540: 1518: 1510: 1506: 1491: 1484: 1469: 1462: 1451:TheUltimate3 1448: 1421: 1406: 1381: 1291: 1271: 1219: 1216:Shukaku sand 1194: 1176: 1146: 1124: 1118: 1113: 1112: 1104: 1090: 1085: 1080:another list 1074:Durin has a 1073: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1039:Third Hokage 1036: 1033:Third Hokage 1020: 1017:Oni Brothers 1006: 1001: 996: 984: 979: 961: 918: 903: 898: 880: 824: 811: 798: 796: 781: 765: 764: 758: 757: 742: 741: 735: 734: 729: 698: 684: 679: 675: 658: 653: 644:TheUltimate3 640: 625: 559: 558: 484: 483: 433: 426: 413: 409: 405: 374: 373: 339: 335: 308: 307: 303: 291: 282: 278: 275:A few things 259: 231: 203: 185: 180: 168: 151: 144: 128: 125: 110: 88: 65: 43: 37: 1737:Gold Dragon 1723:Nice revert 1275:FisherQueen 759:Decaimiento 736:Decaimiento 659:Dragon Ball 434:Dragon Ball 427:Dragon Ball 425:A separate 410:Dragon Ball 340:Dragon Ball 292:Dragon Ball 36:This is an 1418:Talk pages 1253:KrytenKoro 1243:KrytenKoro 1234:KrytenKoro 1223:KrytenKoro 1119:Under the 915:No problem 881:Regarding 793:Orochimaru 637:I got one. 626:Done, see 1821:Johnny542 1812:Johnny542 1802:Johnny542 1792:Johnny542 1782:Johnny542 1772:Johnny542 1765:Johnny542 1732:Blue-Eyes 1715:Konamaiki 1503:666 Satan 1157:for bands 859:WP:NARUTO 784:this page 256:How Come? 77:ArchiveĀ 4 72:ArchiveĀ 3 66:ArchiveĀ 2 60:ArchiveĀ 1 1849:deletion 1436:Ynhockey 1425:Ynhockey 1393:xDanielx 974:Snapper2 330:We have 188:Converse 1757:Oni3298 1487:Pokemon 1410:Tintor2 1355:ov the 1326:ov the 1301:ov the 925:ov the 766:PoĆ©tico 743:PoĆ©tico 562:Snapper 487:Snapper 452:Bardock 444:Krillin 377:Snapper 356:Bardock 348:Krillin 311:Snapper 39:archive 1173:Please 1137:hangon 1091:Sphere 1086:Broken 1065:Sphere 1060:Broken 1007:Sphere 1002:Broken 985:Sphere 980:Broken 970:Naruto 825:Naruto 685:Sphere 680:Broken 555:WP:DBZ 448:Frieza 414:Naruto 406:Naruto 352:Frieza 336:Bleach 147:WP:3RR 1861:A. B. 1232:sand? 1207:talk 1159:, or 1101:Image 821:ISBNs 16:< 1878:here 1855:. 1748:Tobi 1689:talk 1656:talk 1621:talk 1584:talk 1551:talk 1521:talk 1388:here 1382:The 1360:sand 1357:blue 1331:sand 1328:blue 1306:sand 1303:blue 1294:here 1279:Talk 1188:Re: 1125:very 1076:page 930:sand 927:blue 883:this 717:sand 714:blue 663:here 628:here 459:... 440:Goku 412:and 344:Goku 219:sand 216:blue 175:here 171:this 91:here 85:Done 1876:Is 1353:Sam 1324:Sam 1299:Sam 976:. 923:Sam 920:it? 731:// 711:the 705:Sam 304:and 213:the 207:Sam 1684:, 1651:, 1616:, 1579:, 1546:, 1516:, 1363:, 1334:, 1309:, 1281:) 1155:, 1151:, 1140:}} 1134:{{ 933:, 865:. 708:ov 630:. 450:, 446:, 442:, 354:, 350:, 346:, 210:ov 1399:C 1396:/ 1296:. 1277:( 1273:- 702:. 568:o 565:T 560:~ 493:o 490:T 485:~ 383:o 380:T 375:~ 317:o 314:T 309:~ 190:) 186:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Snapper2
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 1
ArchiveĀ 2
ArchiveĀ 3
ArchiveĀ 4
here
kekkei genkai
Sephiroth BCR
00:59, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Sephiroth BCR
05:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Sephiroth BCR
18:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Iorinyc
WP:3RR
Sephiroth BCR
02:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
this
here
Sephiroth BCR
Converse
07:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Sam ov the blue sand
04:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Lord Sesshomaru
Lord Sesshomaru
Lord Sesshomaru
Akuba Ketsueki

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘